1
|
Su JM, Kilburn LB, Mansur DB, Krailo M, Buxton A, Adekunle A, Gajjar A, Adamson PC, Weigel B, Fox E, Blaney SM, Fouladi M. Phase 1/2 Trial of Vorinostat and Radiation and Maintenance Vorinostat in Children with Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma: A Children's Oncology Group Report. Neuro Oncol 2021; 24:655-664. [PMID: 34347089 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noab188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A phase 1/2 trial of vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid), an oral histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, was conducted in children with newly-diagnosed diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) through the Children's Oncology Group (COG) to: 1) determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of vorinostat given concurrently with radiation therapy; 2) document the toxicities of continuing vorinostat as maintenance therapy after radiation; and 3) to determine the efficacy of this regimen by comparing the risk of progression or death with an historical model from past COG trials. METHODS Vorinostat was given once daily, Monday through Friday, during radiation therapy (54 Gy in 30 fractions), and then continued at 230 mg/m 2 daily for a maximum of twelve 28-day cycles. RESULTS Twelve patients enrolled on the phase 1 study; the RP2D of vorinostat given concurrently with radiation was 230 mg/m 2/day, Monday through Friday weekly. The six patients enrolled at the RP2D and an additional 64 patients enrolled onto the phase 2 study contributed to the efficacy assessment. Although vorinostat was well-tolerated, did not interrupt radiation therapy, and was permanently discontinued in only 8.6% of patients due to toxicities, risk for EFS-event was not significantly reduced compared with the target risk derived from historical COG data (p = 0.32; 1-sided). The 1-year EFS was 5.85% (95% CI 1.89 - 13.1%) and 1-year OS was 39.2% (27.8 - 50.5%). CONCLUSIONS Vorinostat given concurrently with radiation followed by vorinostat monotherapy was well tolerated in children with newly-diagnosed DIPG but failed to improve outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jack M Su
- Texas Children's Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Lindsay B Kilburn
- Children's National Medical Center, Center for Cancer & Blood Disorders, Washington, DC, USA
| | - David B Mansur
- Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Radiation Oncology, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Mark Krailo
- Children's Oncology Group, Statistics, Monrovia, CA, USA
| | - Allen Buxton
- Children's Oncology Group, Statistics, Monrovia, CA, USA
| | - Adesina Adekunle
- Texas Children's Hospital, Department of Pathology, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amar Gajjar
- St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Department of Oncology, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Peter C Adamson
- Children's Oncology Group, Global Head, Oncology Department, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Brenda Weigel
- University of Minnesota/Masonic Cancer Center, Department of Pediatrics, Hem/Onc/BMT, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Elizabeth Fox
- St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Department of Oncology, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Susan M Blaney
- Texas Children's Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Maryam Fouladi
- Nationwide Children's Hospital, Neuro-Oncology Program, Columbus, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
Introduction: HIV infection is manageable through the use of antiretroviral drugs. However, HIV reservoirs that are constituted early during infection are resistant to treatment. HIV persistence under treatment necessitates life-long treatment and is associated with various co-morbidities. Two significant research avenues are explored through the development of either new antiretroviral drugs or interventions aimed at stimulating the immune system to eradicate HIV reservoirs.Areas covered: This report provides a review of investigational drugs and cell-based interventions against HIV infection that are currently under Phase I or Phase II clinical trials. We report on new antiretroviral drugs, antibodies directed against viral or host targets, reactivating agents, immune modulators and immune checkpoint inhibitors, and cell-based interventions. These new therapies are often tested in combination, including with current antiretroviral drugs.Expert opinion: Islatravir and GS-6207 are promising antiretroviral drugs that are expected to perform well in phase III trials. Whether the host immune system can be activated sufficiently to reduce HIV reservoirs remains unknown. Additional research is needed to identify surrogate markers of success for curative interventions. Given the current safety and efficacy of antiretroviral treatment, risk-benefits should be carefully evaluated before interventions that risk triggering high levels of immune stimulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanh Thi Pham
- McGill AIDS Centre, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Québec, Canada.,Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Subin Yoo
- McGill AIDS Centre, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Québec, Canada.,Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Thibault Mesplède
- McGill AIDS Centre, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Québec, Canada.,Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|