Photoactivation of pheophorbide-a utilizing 670 nm LEDs elicits cancer suppressive effects in androgen-independent prostate cancer cellular models

OBJECTIVES

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death in men in the USA. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a state-of-the-art treatment that combines high selectivity with minor side effects. Pheophorbide-a (Pheo) is a natural pigment with a photosensitizer property. Our study delved into the impact of Pheo alone or Pheo-PDT combination on the androgen-independent metastatic prostate cancer (AIPC) cell lines DU-145 and C4-2. Furthermore, an in-depth examination has been conducted on the photocytotoxicity mechanism of Pheo-PDT in these specific cell lines.

METHODS

In vitro studies were conducted using the AIPC cell lines. DU-145 and C4-2 cells were treated with Pheo at different concentrations for 60 min alone, or Pheo treatment followed by exposure to 670 nm illumination (60 mW/cm2 in 88 s pulses), producing 5 J/cm2 via portable light-emitting diode.

KEY FINDINGS

Our results show that Pheo-PDT substantially inhibits cell viability, anchorage-independent growth, and migration capacities and induces autophagy and apoptosis via the over-production of reactive oxygen species that mediates endoplasmic reticulum stress in AIPC cell lines.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study highlights the potential benefits of Pheo-PDT in metastatic hormone-insensitive PCa cell lines. It paves the way for treating localized and locally advanced PCa as a possible candidate for castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Drug Release by Direct Jump from Poly(ethylene-glycol-b-ε-caprolactone) Nano-Vector to Cell Membrane

Drug delivery by nanovectors involves numerous processes, one of the most important being its release from the carrier. This point still remains unclear. The current work focuses on this point using poly(ethyleneglycol-b-ε-caprolactone) micelles containing either pheophorbide-a (Pheo-a) as a fluorescent probe and a phototoxic agent or fluorescent copolymers. This study showed that the cellular uptake and the phototoxicity of loaded Pheo-a are ten times higher than those of the free drug and revealed a very low cellular penetration of the fluorescence-labeled micelles. Neither loaded nor free Pheo-a displayed the same cellular localization as the labeled micelles. These results imply that the drug entered the cells without its carrier and probably without a disruption, as suggested by their stability in cell culture medium. These data allowed us to propose that Pheo-a directly migrates from the micelle to the cell without disruption of the vector. This mechanism will be discussed.

Roles of hydrophilicities and hydrophobicities of dye and sacrificial electron donor on the photochemical pathway

Relative rates of the photosensitized production of singlet oxygen ((1)O(2)) and of superoxide (O(2) (•-)) were determined using different couples of dyes and sacrificial electron donors (SEDs) of either high or low hydrophobicities. Such rates were also measured in the absence and presence of single unilamellar vesicles (SUVs) with 9DMPC:1DMPA mol ratio composition. The dyes aluminum phthalocyanine tetrasulfonate (AlPcS(4)) and pheophorbide-a (PHEO) were used as hydrophilic and hydrophobic photosensitizers, respectively. Xanthine (X) and glutathione (GSH) were used as hydrophobic and hydrophilic SEDs, respectively. The presence of SUVs in the aqueous sample produces the physical separation or encounter of SEDs and photosensitizers according to their membrane binding constants. When both the SED and the photosensitizer are localized within the same phase, a strong decrease in the rate of (1)O(2) formation, united to a strong increase in the rate of O(2) (•-) formation, is observed, relative to when both of these species are localized in different phases. The lipid phase is always present in the biological milieu. Thus, the use of a hydrophobic couple of both dye and SED (as in the case of X and PHEO), as well as a hydrophilic couple of both dye and SED (as in the case of GSH and AlPcS4), should strongly favor the Type I mechanism over the Type II. Since only a small number of hydroxyl radicals are needed to initiate a chain reaction of phospholipid peroxidation, the latter could be more toxic to the tumor tissue than peroxidation by a much higher concentration of singlet oxygen molecules.