The evolution of ScotRIGHT: The first pan-Scotland physician trainee research network

Scotland has a distinguished track record in foundational clinical research. From the completion of the first clinical trial undertaken in scurvy to cloning the world's first whole mammal, Scottish basic and clinical research is world leading. More recently, challenges in access to research skills, funding and programmes by clinical trainees led to the development of alternatives to these typical avenues of accessing research opportunities. Trainee networks evolved to meet the needs of trainees looking to access projects and collaboratives beyond audit and quality improvement commonly performed during structured training. These networks have enjoyed enormous success and have succeeded in progressing projects which have impactful outputs for patients, and improving clinical services. Here, we describe the foundation of the first pan-Scotland physician trainee research network; Scottish Trainees Research In Gastroterology and Hepatology (ScotRIGHT). We outline the foundational efforts, requisites and foundations required to develop a research network.

A physician-initiated intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening in Chinese patients

BACKGROUND

Among Chinese American individuals, only approximately 42% of cases of colorectal cancer (CRC) are diagnosed at an early stage, possibly because these patients are less likely than non-Hispanic white individuals to undergo CRC screening.

METHODS

Primary care physicians (PCPs) were recruited from a local independent practice association serving Chinese Americans and randomized into early-intervention and delayed-intervention groups. PCPs in the early-intervention group received continuing medical education (CME), and their patients received an intervention mailer, consisting of a letter with the PCP's recommendation, a bilingual educational booklet, and a fecal occult blood test (FOBT) kit in year 1. PCPs in the delayed-intervention group received no CME, and their patients received the mailers in year 2.

RESULTS

A total of 20 PCPs were assigned to the early-intervention and 22 PCPs to the delayed-intervention group. A total of 3120 patients of these participating PCPs who had undergone CRC screening that was due during the study period were included. A total of 915 mailers were sent in year 1 and 830 mailers were sent in year 2. FOBT screening rates increased from 26.7% at baseline to 58.5% in year 1 in the early-intervention group versus 19.6% at baseline to 22.2% in year 1 in the delayed-intervention group (P<.0001). The overall effect size of the mailer intervention with or without CME was estimated as a difference of 26.6 percentage points (95% confidence interval, 22.0-31.2 percentage points) from baseline compared with usual care. The intervention was found to have no impact on rates of colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the current pilot study demonstrated that a mailer including educational materials and FOBT kits can increase CRC screening rates with or without CME for the PCPs. Cancer 2018;124:1568-75. © 2018 American Cancer Society.

Physician network position and patient outcomes following implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate two novel measures of physician network centrality and their associations with implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) procedure volume and health outcomes.

DATA SOURCES

Medicare claims and the National Cardiovascular Data Registry data from 2007 to 2011.

STUDY DESIGN

We constructed a national cardiovascular disease patient-sharing physician network and used network analysis to characterize physician network centrality with two measures: within-hospital degree centrality (number of connections within a hospital) and across-hospital degree centrality (number of connections across hospitals). The primary outcome was risk-adjusted 2-year case fatality. Hierarchical logistic regression estimated the effects of physician's within-hospital and across-hospital degree centrality on case fatality. We included 105 109 ICD therapy patients and 3474 ICD implanting physicians in our analyses.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

After controlling for other physician and hospital characteristics, we observed greater risk-adjusted case fatality among patients treated by physicians in the highest across-hospital degree tertile compared to lowest tertile (OR [95% CI] = 1.10 [1.04-1.16], P = 0.001) and lowest tertile volume physicians compared with highest volume (OR [95% CI] = 0.90 [0.84-0.95], P < 0.001). Physician's within-hospital degree tertile was inversely associated with case fatality but not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Degree centrality measures capture information independent of procedure volume and raise questions about the quality of physicians with networks that predict worse health outcomes.

Assessing Variation in Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Therapy Guideline Adherence With Physician and Hospital Patient-sharing Networks

BACKGROUND

Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy is used for primary prevention of death among people with heart failure, and new evidence in 2005 on its effectiveness changed practice guidelines in the United States.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study is to examine how the connectedness of physicians and hospitals, measured using network analysis, relates to guideline-consistent ICD implantation.

RESEARCH DESIGN

We constructed physician and hospital networks for cardiovascular disease. Physicians were linked if they shared cardiovascular disease patients; these links were aggregated by hospital affiliation to construct a hospital network.

SUBJECTS

Medicare beneficiaries who underwent ICD therapy for primary prevention from 2007 to 2011.

MEASURES

The clinical outcome of interest was guideline-consistent ICD implantation, calculated using the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. The exposure variables of interest were the network measures of the ICD surgeon, the referring hospital, and the hospital where the ICD surgery occurred.

RESULTS

We focused on patients who were referred between hospitals for ICD implantation because they were more likely influenced by the hospital network (n=28,179). Patients were less likely to meet guidelines if their referring hospital had more connections to other hospitals (OR, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-0.96) and more likely to meet guidelines if their ICD surgery hospital had more connections (OR, 1.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.98-2.64). The ICD surgeon's network measures were not associated with guideline-consistent implantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Associations between the hospital network measures and guideline adherence suggests new approaches to better disseminate clinical guidelines across health systems.

Analysis of the U.S. patient referral network

In this paper, we analyze the US Patient Referral Network (also called the Shared Patient Network) and various subnetworks for the years 2009 to 2015. In these networks, two physicians are linked if a patient encounters both of them within a specified time interval, according to the data made available by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. We find power law distributions on most state-level data as well as a core-periphery structure. On a national and state level, we discover a so-called small-world structure as well as a "gravity law" of the type found in some large-scale economic networks. Some physicians play the role of hubs for interstate referral. Strong correlations between certain network statistics with health care system statistics at both the state and national levels are discovered. The patterns in the referral network evinced using several statistical analyses involving key metrics derived from the network illustrate the potential for using network analysis to provide new insights into the health care system and opportunities or mechanisms for catalyzing improvements.