The Emergence of a vv + MDV Can Break through the Protections Provided by the Current Vaccines

Marek’s disease (MD) is an infectious malignant T-cell lymphoma proliferative disease caused by Marek’s disease virus (MDV). In recent years, the emergence of very virulent (vv) and/or very virulent plus (vv +) strains of MDV in the field has been suggested as one of the causes of vaccination failure. The pathogenicity of the MDV strain GX18NNM4, isolated from a clinical outbreak in a broiler breeder flock that was vaccinated with CVI988/Rispens, was investigated. In the vaccination-challenge test, GX18NNM4 was able to break through the protections provided by the vaccines CVI988 and 814. It also significantly reduced body weight gain and caused marked gross lesions and a large area of infiltration of neoplastic lymphocyte cells in the heart, liver, pancreas, etc. of the infected birds. In addition, the expressions of programmed death 1 (PD-1) and its ligand, programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), in the spleens and cecal tonsils (CTs) of the unvaccinated challenged birds were significantly increased compared to those in the vaccinated challenged birds, indicating that the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway is related to immune evasion mechanisms. The results showed that the GX18NNM4 strain could cause severe immunosuppression and significantly decrease the protections provided by the current commercial vaccines, thus showing GX18NNM4 to be a vv + MDV strain.

Comparative evaluation of antidotal efficacy of 2-PAM and HNK-102 oximes during inhalation of sarin vapor in Swiss albino mice

Efficacy of two oximes treatments evaluated during inhalation of sarin vapor (LCt₅₀, 755.9 mg/min/m³) in simulated real scenario in vivo. Majority of mice either became moribund or died within 1-2 min during exposure to multifold-lethal concentrations of sarin vapor. Protection indices were determined by exposing to sarin vapor in two sessions, 1 min exposure followed by treatments with or without HNK-102 (56.56 mg/kg, im) or 2-PAM (30 mg/kg, im) and atropine (10 mg/kg, ip), and again exposed for remaining 14 min. Protection offered by HNK-102 was found to be four folds higher compared to 2-PAM in the same toxic environment. Secondly, sub-lethal concentration of sarin vapor (0.8 × LCt₅₀ or 605 mg/min/m³), 24 h post investigations revealed that the oximes could not reactivate brain and serum acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity. The treatments prevented increase in protein concentration (p < .05) and macrophages infiltration compared to sarin alone group in broncho-alveolar lavage fluid. Lung histopathology showed intense peribronchial infiltration and edema with desquamating epithelial lining and mild to moderate alveolar septal infiltration in sarin and atropine groups, respectively. Noticeable peeling-off observed in epithelial lining and sporadic mild infiltration of epithelial cells at bronchiolar region in 2-PAM and HNK-102 groups, respectively. The oximes failed to reactivate AChE activity; however, the mice survived up to 6.0 × LCt₅₀, proved involvement of non-AChE targets in sarin toxicity. Atropine alone treatment was found to be either ineffective or increased the toxicity. HNK-102, exhibited better survivability with lung protection, can be considered as a better replacement for 2-PAM to treat sarin inhalation induced poisoning.