Mobile infrared slit-light scanner for rapid eye disease screening

Purpose

Timely detection and treatment of visual impairments and age-related eye diseases are essential for maintaining a longer, healthier life. However, the shortage of appropriate medical equipment often impedes early detection. We have developed a portable self-imaging slit-light device utilizing NIR light and a scanning mirror. The objective of our study is to assess the accuracy and compare the performance of our device with conventional nonportable slit-lamp microscopes and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) for screening and remotely diagnosing eye diseases, such as cataracts and glaucoma, outside of an eye clinic.

Approach

The NIR light provides an advantage as measurements are nonmydriatic and less traumatic for patients. A cross-sectional study involving Japanese adults was conducted. Cataract evaluation was performed using photographs captured by the device. Van-Herick grading was assessed by the ratio of peripheral anterior chamber depth to peripheral corneal thickness, in addition to the iridocorneal angle using Image J software.

Results

The correlation coefficient between values obtained by AS-OCT, and our fabricated portable scanning slit-light device was notably high. The results indicate that our portable device is equally reliable as the conventional nonportable slit-lamp microscope and AS-OCT for screening and evaluating eye diseases.

Conclusions

Our fabricated device matches the functionality of the traditional slit lamp, offering a cost-effective and portable solution. Ideal for remote locations, healthcare facilities, or areas affected by disasters, our scanning slit-light device can provide easy access to initial eye examinations and supports digital eye healthcare initiatives.

Clinical Observation of Allergic Conjunctival Diseases with Portable and Recordable Slit-Lamp Device

BACKGROUND

The incidence of allergic conjunctival diseases (ACDs) is gradually increasing worldwide. Both ophthalmologists and non-ophthalmologists prescribe eye drops to treat ACDs; however, there are many cases which are treated without sufficient examination and diagnosis of the eyes. We have invented a portable, recordable, and smartphone-attachable slit-lamp device-Smart Eye Camera (SEC). The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic abilities of ACDs between the SEC and the conventional, non-portable slit-lamp microscope.

METHODS

This prospective observational study included 32 eyes of 17 Japanese patients (mean age: 21.5 ± 14.8 years; range: 11-51 years; female: 5). The severity of 10 objective signs in the palpebral conjunctiva, bulbar conjunctiva, limbus, and cornea were scored on a grading scale of 0 to 4 (0 = normal; 1+ = mild; 2+ = moderate; 3+ = severe), respectively. First, the conventional slit-lamp microscope was used to examine the grade of the ACDs. Second, another ophthalmologist filmed the eyes using the SEC and two other ophthalmologists evaluated the grades on another day. The correlation and inter-rater reproducibility in total scores among the two devices were determined.

RESULTS

Total scores of clinical signs, evaluated by the two approaches, correlated significantly (both eyes: r = 0.918 (95% CI: 0.839 to 0.959; p < 0.001)), with substantial inter-rater agreement (weighted κ value = 0.631 (95% CI: 0.601 to 0.661; p < 0.001)).

CONCLUSIONS

The SEC is as reliable as the conventional non-portable slit-lamp microscope for assessing ACDs.

Evaluation of Nuclear Cataract with Smartphone-Attachable Slit-Lamp Device

Background: Visual impairments and age-related eye diseases need to be detected and treated in a timely manner. However, this is often hampered by lack of appropriate medical equipment. We have invented a portable, recordable, and smartphone-attachable slit-lamp device, called the Smart Eye Camera (SEC). The aim of this study was to compare evaluating nuclear cataract (NUC) between the SEC and the conventional, non-portable slit-lamp microscope. Methods: A total of 128 eyes of 64 Japanese patients (mean age: 73.95 ± 9.28 years; range: 51‒92 years; female: 34) were enrolled. The NUC was classified into four grades (grade 0 to 3) based on three standard photographs of nuclear opacities according to the WHO classification by ophthalmologists. An ophthalmic healthcare assistant (non-ophthalmologist) filmed the eyes in video mode by the SEC and an ophthalmologist graded the NUC. Grade correlation and inter-rater reproducibility were determined. Results: NUC grading by the two approaches correlated significantly (both eyes: r = 0.871 [95%CI: 0.821 to 0.907; p < 0.001]). Inter-rater agreement was high (weighted κ = 0.807 [95%CI: 0.798 to 0.816; p < 0.001]). Conclusions: This study suggests that the SEC is as reliable as the conventional non-portable slit-lamp microscope for evaluating NUC.