Value of conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the assessment of renal allograft dysfunction and prognosis

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound (US) is the primary imaging modality for the assessment of transplanted kidneys. This study aims to investigate the ability of conventional US and contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) in assessing renal allograft function and prognosis.

METHODS

A total of 78 consecutive renal allograft recipients were enrolled. Patients were classified as normal allograft function (n = 41) and allograft dysfunction (n = 37) groups. All patients underwent US and parameters were measured. The independent-samples t-test or Mann-Whitney U test, logistic regression analysis, Kaplan-Meier survival plots, and Cox regression analysis were used.

RESULTS

In multivariable analysis, cortical echo intensity (EI) and cortical peak intensity (PI) were determinant US parameters for renal allograft dysfunction (p = .024 and p = .003, respectively). The combination of cortical EI and PI showed an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of .785 (p < .001). Of 78 patients (median follow-up: 20mo), 16 (20.5%) exhibited composite end points. Cortical PI had a general prediction accuracy with an AUROC of .691, sensitivity of 87.5%, and specificity of 46.8% at the threshold of 22.08 dB in predicting prognosis (p = .019). The combination of estimated-glomerular filtration rate (e-GFR) and PI in predicting prognosis showed an AUROC of .845 with a cut-off value of .836, sensitivity of 84.0%, and specificity of 67.3% (p < .001).

CONCLUSION

This study indicates that cortical EI and PI are useful US parameters for evaluating renal allograft function and e-GFR combined with PI may provide a more accurate predictor of survival.

Course of renal allograft function after diagnosis and treatment of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders in pediatric kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) is a life-threatening complication in renal transplant recipients. Immunomodulatory and chemotherapeutic treatment potentially affect allograft function. The aim of this study was to evaluate graft function of pediatric kidney transplant recipients following diagnosis and standardized treatment of PTLD.

METHODS

Patients were identified from the German Ped-PTLD registry, and data on renal function were retrospectively retrieved from patient charts. For PTLD treatment, immunosuppressive therapy was reduced and all children received rituximab (375 mg/m² ) for up to six doses. Two patients required additional low-dose chemotherapy. Renal allograft function was monitored by consecutive measurements of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at defined time points. Follow-up was up to 60 months after PTLD.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were included in this cohort analysis. Median time from transplantation to PTLD was 2.4 years. Histopathology showed monomorphic lesions in 16 and polymorphic in 4 patients. Two patients experienced PTLD relapse after 2 and 14 months. Range-based analysis of variance showed stable allograft function in 17 of 20 patients (85%). Mean eGFR increased during early treatment phase. One patient experienced graft rejection 5.3 years after diagnosis of PTLD. Another patient developed recurrence of primary renal disease (focal-segmental glomerulosclerosis) and lost his renal allograft 3.8 years post-transplant (2.0 years after PTLD diagnosis).

CONCLUSION

Treatment of PTLD with rituximab with or without low-dose chemotherapy in combination with reduced immunosuppression, mostly comprising of an mTOR inhibitor-based, calcineurin inhibitor-free regimen, is associated with stable graft function and favorable graft survival in pediatric renal transplant patients.

Can uric acid blood levels in renal transplant recipients predict allograft outcome?

Background

Hyperuricemia is common after renal transplantation, especially in those receiving calcineurin inhibitors. Little, however, is known about the relationship between uric acid (UA) levels and allograft outcome.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective single-center analysis (N = 368) in order to assess UA blood levels post-transplant association with allograft outcome. For this study, a median serum UA level of all measured UA levels from 1 month to 1 year post renal transplantation was calculated.

Results

Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the median UA level measured between 1 and 12 months post-transplant. Those with median UA level ≥ 7 and ≥ 6 mg/dL (N = 164) versus median UA level < 7 and < 6 mg/dL for men and women respectively (N = 204) had lower GFR values at 1, 3 and 5 years posttransplant (mean GFR ± SD of 43.4 ± 20.6 and 58 ± 19.9 at 3 years post-transplant, p < 0.001). In multivariate models, UA levels were no longer significantly associated with renal allograft function. In a multivariate cox proportional hazard model, UA level was found to be independently associated with increased risk for death-censored graft loss (HR of 1.3, 95% CI 1.0–1.7, p < 0.05 for every increase of 1 mg/dL in UA level).

Conclusion

Hyperuricemia was found to be associated with increased death- censored graft loss but not with allograft function. Increased UA levels were not found to be an independent predictor of long-term allograft function despite the known association of hyperuricemia with the progression of cardiovascular and renal disease.

Comparison of efficacy and safety between febuxostat and allopurinol in early post-renal transplant recipients with new onset of hyperuricemia

What is known and objective

Febuxostat and allopurinol are xanthine oxidase inhibitors for urate‐lowering therapy. The efficacy and safety of febuxostat and allopurinol have been mostly reported in hyperuricemia patients with normal renal function. Here, we aimed to compare the effects of these two drugs in early post‐renal transplant recipients, focusing on evaluating the urate‐lowering effect and recovery of allograft renal function.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was performed in early post‐renal transplant recipients with new onset of hyperuricemia receiving febuxostat or allopurinol therapy. Serum uric acid (UA) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were detected on days 3, 7 and 15 and months 1, 3 and 6 after therapy initiation. Liver and blood functions were monitored and other adverse events were recorded.

Results and discussion

A total of 48 and 33 patients were enrolled in the febuxostat and allopurinol groups, respectively. Significant UA‐lowering effects were observed on day 3 in both groups. Febuxostat caused a more rapid UA decline, starting on day 3 and lasting for 1 month. The most apparent contrast was found in UA level (267.25 ± 93.66 vs 334.18 ± 96.56 μmol/L, P = 0.003) on day 7; 62.5% and 30.3% of patients achieved target UA level in febuxostat and allopurinol groups respectively on day 3 (P = 0.004), but there was no significant difference between two groups from days 15 to months 6. The median times to achieve target UA level were 3 and 5 days in febuxostat and allopurinol groups respectively (P = 0.002). The eGFR levels and recovering rates were gradually upregulated but no significant differences were found between two groups. No abnormities related to febuxostat or allopurinol were observed.

What is new and conclusion

This is the first comprehensive evaluation of UA‐lowering effects of febuxostat and allopurinol in early post‐renal transplant recipients. Febuxostat caused a marginally quicker serum UA‐lowering effect than allopurinol, but there was no advantage for long‐term use of febuxostat. The drugs had no significant differences in impacting renal allograft function recovery, and both were well tolerated.

Ipsilateral versus contralateral placement of the pancreas allograft in pancreas after kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

In a diabetic, uremic kidney transplant recipient that may receive a future pancreas after kidney (PAK) transplant, the kidney is typically implanted on the left side in anticipation of the subsequent pancreas transplant on the right side. In this study, we sought to determine if ipsilateral PAK (iPAK) is as safe as contralateral PAK (cPAK).

METHODS

The 115 PAK transplants (iPAK n = 57, cPAK n = 58) were performed from 1997-2010 and results were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Kidney graft survival and pancreas graft survival was similar between the two groups. Kidney graft function according to serum creatinine and eGFR was not different between the cPAK and the iPAK groups and there were no episodes of kidney graft thrombosis in either group. Subgroup analyses focusing on donor source also did not show worse outcomes for graft survivals in iPAK group when compared to cPAK group.

CONCLUSIONS

Pancreas and kidney graft survival in PAK transplants is unaffected by the surgical procedure and iPAK is safe.

Incidence, risk factors, and the impact of allograft pyelonephritis on renal allograft function

BACKGROUND

The impact of allograft pyelonephritis (AGPN) on renal allograft function is controversial. In this study, we evaluated the incidence, risk factors, and the impact of AGPN on renal allograft function.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study in adult renal allograft recipients with 1-year follow-up after transplantation (Tx). Renal allograft function was evaluated by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (by Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula) and 24-h urine protein excretion.

RESULTS

A total of 431 renal allograft recipients were analyzed; 57 (13.2%) developed AGPN within 1 year after Tx. Median time between Tx and AGPN was 50 days. Risk factors for AGPN were the presence of a urological catheter (odds ratio [OR] = 18.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 8.00-44.81, P < 0.001) and preceding asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) (OR = 2.16, 95% CI = 1.20-3.90, P = 0.009). In 72.7%, the causative microorganism of ASB was identical to that of the succeeding AGPN episode. Multivariable linear regression analysis showed that experiencing AGPN did not decrease the eGFR (P = 0.61) nor did increased proteinuria (P = 0.29) 1 year after Tx. For the eGFR, an interaction was found between AGPN/bacteriuria (BU) and acute rejection (AR): the group experiencing BU preceding AR had significantly (P < 0.001) lower eGFR compared with the group that experienced only AR (21 mL/min/1.73 m² vs. 48 mL/min/1.73 m² ), as a result of increased prevalence of combined rejections within the BU group.

CONCLUSION

Indwelling urological catheters and preceding ASB are associated with developing AGPN. An incident of AGPN itself does not impair renal allograft function 1 year after Tx. However, a relevant interaction occurs between BU and AR, in which the sequence of occurrence of these 2 events synergistically impairs the eGFR.