1
|
Finocchietti M, Marino ML, Rosa AC, Bellini A, Masiero L, Cardillo M, Massari M, Spila Alegiani S, Pierobon S, Ferroni E, Zanforlini M, Leoni O, Ledda S, Garau D, Davoli M, Addis A, Belleudi V. Immunosuppression with Generics in Liver and Kidney Transplantation: A Real-World Evidence Study. Drug Des Devel Ther 2024; 18:53-69. [PMID: 38229916 PMCID: PMC10790661 DOI: 10.2147/dddt.s431121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study evaluates the use, benefit-risk profile, and economic impact of generic immunosuppressants (tacrolimus-TAC, cyclosporine-CsA, and mycophenolate-MYC) in kidney and liver transplant recipients compared to brand-name drugs. Patients and Methods A retrospective multicentre observational study, involving four Italian regions, was conducted based on the national transplant Information system and regional healthcare claims data. The analysis focused on incident patients who received kidney and liver transplants between 2013 and 2019 and evaluated the use of generic of CsA, TAC, and MYC during the 30-day period following discharge. For each type of transplant and immunosuppressive agent, the benefit-risk profile of generic vs branded drugs in a two-year window was estimated by multivariate Cox models (HR; 95% CI). Furthermore, the potential cost savings per person associated with one year of treatment using generics were calculated. Results The utilization of generic drugs showed a significant increase; over the study years, the proportion of users among kidney recipients ranged from 14.2% to 40.5% for TAC, from 36.9% to 56.7% for MYC, and from 18.2% to 94.7% for CsA. A great variability in generic uptake for region was found. A comparable risk-benefit profile between generic and branded formulations was shown for all immunosuppressors considered. Choosing generic immunosuppressants during maintenance could result in yearly savings of around 2000 euros per person for each therapy ingredient. Conclusion The study shows an increasing proportion of patients using generic immunosuppressive drugs over time suggesting a growing acceptance of generics within the transplant community and reveals comparable risk-benefit profiles between the generic and branded formulations of TAC, CsA, and MYC. A significant variability in the use of generics immunosuppressive agents was found both at the regional level and among transplant centers and future research should delve into regional prescribing variations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Finocchietti
- Department of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service-ASL Roma 1, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Lucia Marino
- Department of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service-ASL Roma 1, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro C Rosa
- Department of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service-ASL Roma 1, Rome, Italy
| | - Arianna Bellini
- Department of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service-ASL Roma 1, Rome, Italy
| | - Lucia Masiero
- Italian National Transplant Center, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
| | - Massimo Cardillo
- Italian National Transplant Center, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Massari
- National Center for Drug Research and Evaluation, Istituto Superiore Di Sanità, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Martina Zanforlini
- The innovation and procurement regional company, A.R.I.A. S.p.A.-Lombardy Region, Milan, Italy
| | - Olivia Leoni
- Regional Epidemiological Observatory, Lombardy Region, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Ledda
- General Directorate for Health, Sardinia Region, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Donatella Garau
- General Directorate for Health, Sardinia Region, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Marina Davoli
- Department of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service-ASL Roma 1, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Addis
- Department of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service-ASL Roma 1, Rome, Italy
| | - Valeria Belleudi
- Department of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service-ASL Roma 1, Rome, Italy
| | - On behalf of CESIT Study Group
- Department of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service-ASL Roma 1, Rome, Italy
- Italian National Transplant Center, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
- National Center for Drug Research and Evaluation, Istituto Superiore Di Sanità, Rome, Italy
- Azienda Zero, Veneto Region, Padua, Italy
- The innovation and procurement regional company, A.R.I.A. S.p.A.-Lombardy Region, Milan, Italy
- Regional Epidemiological Observatory, Lombardy Region, Milan, Italy
- General Directorate for Health, Sardinia Region, Cagliari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Castagnetti F, Pane F, Rosti G, Saglio G, Breccia M. Dosing Strategies for Improving the Risk-Benefit Profile of Ponatinib in Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase. Front Oncol 2021; 11:642005. [PMID: 33796468 PMCID: PMC8009177 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.642005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2020] [Accepted: 01/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has been advanced by the development of small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), which target the fusion protein BCR-ABL1 expressed by the Philadelphia chromosome. Ponatinib is a 3rd generation TKI that binds BCR-ABL1 with high affinity and inhibits most BCR-ABL1 mutants, including the T315I mutation. The approved starting dose of ponatinib is 45 mg once daily (full dose), however, the need for a full dose, especially in patients with dose adjustments due to tolerability problems, remains undemonstrated. Lower starting doses of ponatinib (30 mg or 15 mg once daily) for patients “with lesser degrees of resistance or multiple intolerances, especially those with an increased cardiovascular risk profile” has been recommended by the 2020 European LeukemiaNet. However, the available literature and guidance on the use of ponatinib at low dosage are limited. The objective of this paper is to describe how we select ponatinib dosage for CML patients in chronic phase in our clinical practice based on the available evidence and our clinical experience. We propose dosing regimens for the optimal starting dose for six generic cases of CML patients in chronic phase eligible for the switch to ponatinib and provide an algorithm to guide ponatinib dosing during treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fausto Castagnetti
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli", Bologna, Italy.,Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Pane
- Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Chirurgia, Università di Napoli Federico II, Napoli, Italy
| | - Gianantonio Rosti
- IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Saglio
- Division of Hematology & Internal Medicine, Department of Clinical & Biological Sciences of the University of Turin, 'San Luigi Gonzaga' University Hospital, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Massimo Breccia
- Hematology, Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|