Comparative analysis of the efficacy and safety of electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy combined with x-ray or radial endobronchial ultrasound biopsy in the diagnosis of small peripheral pulmonary nodules

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical value and safety of electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB) combined with radial endobronchial ultrasound (R-EBUS) or x-ray in the diagnosis of small peripheral pulmonary nodules that cannot be diagnosed by conventional bronchoscopy.

METHODS

Fifty-six patients with peripheral pulmonary nodules of <3 cm in diameter who underwent bronchoscopy at the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University and Dushu Lake Hospital of Soochow University from February 2019 to January 2022 were selected as the study subjects, including 24 patients who underwent ENB combined with x-ray and 32 patients who underwent ENB combined with R-EBUS. ENB was used as the guiding method in both groups, and x-ray group and R-EBUS group were combined with x-ray and R-EBUS, respectively, to determine whether the lesion was reached. In x-ray group, biopsy and brushing were performed under fluoroscopic guidance. Using the results of surgery, puncture pathology, or clinical follow-up 1 year as the gold standard, the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), diagnostic yield, negative likelihood ratio (LR-), Youden index, missed diagnosis rate, success rate, and κ value were compared between the two groups, and the occurrence of postoperative complications was also compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The negative predictive value of the R-EBUS group was significantly better than that of the x-ray group (p = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

Even with smaller nodule diameters, the negative predictive value of ENB combined with R-EBUS were still higher than that of the x-ray group.

Efficacy of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial biopsy without guide sheath for small peripheral pulmonary lesions (≤15 mm): A retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Endobronchial ultrasonography-guided transbronchial biopsy (EBUS-TBB) with guide sheath (GS) is an effective procedure for diagnosing small peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) (≤20 mm in the largest diameter). However, samples obtained using EBUS-TBB with GS are small, and the diagnostic yield of small PPLs biopsied using EBUS-TBB with GS is unsatisfactory.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic yield of small PPLs using EBUS-TBB without GS compared to that with GS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 1 April 2013 and 31 March 2015, 276 consecutive lesions were biopsied using EBUS-TBB with GS or without GS. We retrospectively compared EBUS-TBB with and without GS in terms of the diagnostic yield and complications related to small PPLs (≤20 mm).

RESULTS

Of the 276 lesions who underwent EBUS-TBB with or without GS, we identified 80 lesions with small PPLs (≤20 mm). Sixty-two lesions were successfully diagnosed by EBUS-TBB (77.5%, diagnostic yield). The diagnostic yield of PPLs using EBUS-TBB without GS was not significantly higher than that using EBUS-TBB with GS (34/41 = 82.9% and 28/39 = 71.7%, respectively; p = 0.233). However, according to size (≤15 mm or > 15 mm), location (upper, middle/lingular, or lower area), and structure (solid nodule or ground-glass opacity), the diagnostic yield of small PPLs (≤15 mm) using EBUS-TBB without GS was significantly higher than with GS (21/26 = 80.7% vs. 8/16 = 50.0%, p = 0.036). There were no complications among the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

EBUS-TBB without GS is an effective and safe procedure for diagnosing small PPLs (≤15 mm) compared to that with GS.