Deep learning predicts malignancy and metastasis of solid pulmonary nodules from CT scans

In the clinic, it is difficult to distinguish the malignancy and aggressiveness of solid pulmonary nodules (PNs). Incorrect assessments may lead to delayed diagnosis and an increased risk of complications. We developed and validated a deep learning-based model for the prediction of malignancy as well as local or distant metastasis in solid PNs based on CT images of primary lesions during initial diagnosis. In this study, we reviewed the data from multiple patients with solid PNs at our institution from 1 January 2019 to 30 April 2022. The patients were divided into three groups: benign, Ia-stage lung cancer, and T1-stage lung cancer with metastasis. Each cohort was further split into training and testing groups. The deep learning system predicted the malignancy and metastasis status of solid PNs based on CT images, and then we compared the malignancy prediction results among four different levels of clinicians. Experiments confirmed that human-computer collaboration can further enhance diagnostic accuracy. We made a held-out testing set of 134 cases, with 689 cases in total. Our convolutional neural network model reached an area under the ROC (AUC) of 80.37% for malignancy prediction and an AUC of 86.44% for metastasis prediction. In observer studies involving four clinicians, the proposed deep learning method outperformed a junior respiratory clinician and a 5-year respiratory clinician by considerable margins; it was on par with a senior respiratory clinician and was only slightly inferior to a senior radiologist. Our human-computer collaboration experiment showed that by simply adding binary human diagnosis into model prediction probabilities, model AUC scores improved to 81.80-88.70% when combined with three out of four clinicians. In summary, the deep learning method can accurately diagnose the malignancy of solid PNs, improve its performance when collaborating with human experts, predict local or distant metastasis in patients with T1-stage lung cancer, and facilitate the application of precision medicine.

A New Outlook on the Ability to Accumulate an Iodine Contrast Agent in Solid Lung Tumors Based on Virtual Monochromatic Images in Dual Energy Computed Tomography (DECT): Analysis in Two Phases of Contrast Enhancement

For some time, dual energy computed tomography (DECT) has been an established method used in a vast array of clinical applications, including lung nodule assessment. The aim of this study was to analyze (using monochromatic DECT images) how the X-ray absorption of solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) depends on the iodine contrast agent and when X-ray absorption is no longer dependent on the accumulated contrast agent. Sixty-six patients with diagnosed solid lung tumors underwent DECT scans in the late arterial phase (AP) and venous phase (VP) between January 2017 and June 2018. Statistically significant correlations (p ≤ 0.001) of the iodine contrast concentration were found in the energy range of 40–90 keV in the AP phase and in the range of 40–80 keV in the VP phase. The strongest correlation was found between the concentrations of the contrast agent and the scanning energy of 40 keV. At the higher scanning energy, no significant correlations were found. We concluded that it is most useful to evaluate lung lesions in DECT virtual monochromatic images (VMIs) in the energy range of 40–80 keV. We recommend assessing SPNs in only one phase of contrast enhancement to reduce the absorbed radiation dose.

Comparison of Radiomic Models Based on Low-Dose and Standard-Dose CT for Prediction of Adenocarcinomas and Benign Lesions in Solid Pulmonary Nodules

Objectives

This study aimed to develop radiomic models based on low-dose CT (LDCT) and standard-dose CT to distinguish adenocarcinomas from benign lesions in patients with solid solitary pulmonary nodules and compare the performance among these radiomic models and Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS). The reproducibility of radiomic features between LDCT and standard-dose CT were also evaluated.

Methods

A total of 141 consecutive pathologically confirmed solid solitary pulmonary nodules were enrolled including 50 adenocarcinomas and 48 benign nodules in primary cohort and 22 adenocarcinomas and 21 benign nodules in validation cohort. LDCT and standard-dose CT scans were conducted using same acquisition parameters and reconstruction method except for radiation dose. All nodules were automatically segmented and 104 original radiomic features were extracted. The concordance correlation coefficient was used to quantify reproducibility of radiomic features between LDCT and standard-dose CT. Radiomic features were selected to build radiomic signature, and clinical characteristics and radiomic signature were combined to develop radiomic nomogram for LDCT and standard-dose CT, respectively. The performance of radiomic models and Lung-RADS was assessed by area under curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, and specificity.

Results

Shape and first order features, and neighboring gray tone difference matrix features were highly reproducible between LDCT and standard-dose CT. No significant differences of AUCs were found among radiomic signature and nomogram of LDCT and standard-dose CT in both primary and validation cohort (0.915 vs. 0.919 vs. 0.898 vs. 0.909 and 0.976 vs. 0.976 vs. 0.985 vs. 0.987, respectively). These radiomic models had higher specificity than Lung-RADS (all correct P < 0.05), while there were no significant differences of sensitivity between Lung-RADS and radiomic models.

Conclusions

The diagnostic performance of LDCT-based radiomic models to differentiate adenocarcinomas from benign lesions in solid pulmonary nodules were equivalent to that of standard-dose CT. The LDCT-based radiomic model with higher specificity and lower false-positive rate than Lung-RADS might help reduce overdiagnosis and overtreatment of solid pulmonary nodules in lung cancer screening.

Solid Nodule Appearance as a Predictor of Tumor Spread Through Air Spaces in Patients with Lung Adenocarcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Study

OBJECTIVE

Spread through air spaces (STAS) has been reported to be an invasive histological pattern with poor prognosis in lung cancer; however, little is known about its intrinsic risk factors. This work analyzed the correlation between pathological and radiological features and STAS in resected lung adenocarcinomas.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 1821 consecutive surgically treated patients with histologically diagnosed lung adenocarcinoma (174 positive for STAS and 1647 negative for STAS) from December 2017 to November 2018 at our institution. Propensity score matching identified 170 well-balanced pairs of patients. The correlations between pathological and radiological features and the presence of STAS were analyzed.

RESULTS

Before propensity matching, the incidence rate of STAS was 9.6% in all patients. In matched cohorts, multivariate analysis showed that the presence of STAS was significantly correlated with pure solid nodules (SNs) (p = 0.001) and solid/micropapillary patterns (SMPs) (p = 0.002). The odds ratio for STAS in SN-positive and SMP-positive adenocarcinoma against that in SN-negative and SMP-negative adenocarcinoma was 10.922 (95% confidence interval, 5.826-20.475; p < 0.001). Tumor differentiation, visceral pleural invasion (VPI), lymphovascular invasion (LVI), invasive adenocarcinoma, and non-lepidic subtype were significantly associated with STAS in the univariate analysis (p < 0.05); however, the differences failed to reach a significant level in the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

We found that STAS was significantly correlated with several invasive clinicopathological patterns. The presence of SNs and SMPs were revealed as independent predictors for STAS, which could offer clinicians clues to identify STAS-positive adenocarcinoma.