Craniofacial Defects in Embryos with Homozygous Deletion of Eftud2 in Their Neural Crest Cells Are Not Rescued by Trp53 Deletion

Embryos with homozygous mutation of Eftud2 in their neural crest cells (Eftud2^ncc−/−) have brain and craniofacial malformations, hyperactivation of the P53-pathway and die before birth. Treatment of Eftud2^ncc−/− embryos with pifithrin-α, a P53-inhibitor, partly improved brain and craniofacial development. To uncover if craniofacial malformations and death were indeed due to P53 hyperactivation we generated embryos with homozygous loss of function mutations in both Eftud2 and Trp53 in the neural crest cells. We evaluated the molecular mechanism underlying craniofacial development in pifithrin-α-treated embryos and in Eftud2; Trp53 double homozygous (Eftud2^ncc−/−; Trp53^ncc−/−) mutant embryos. Eftud2^ncc−/− embryos that were treated with pifithrin-α or homozygous mutant for Trp53 in their neural crest cells showed reduced apoptosis in their neural tube and reduced P53-target activity. Furthermore, although the number of SOX10 positive cranial neural crest cells was increased in embryonic day (E) 9.0 Eftud2^ncc−/−; Trp53^ncc−/− embryos compared to Eftud2^ncc−/− mutants, brain and craniofacial development, and survival were not improved in double mutant embryos. Furthermore, mis-splicing of both P53-regulated transcripts, Mdm2 and Foxm1, and a P53-independent transcript, Synj2bp, was increased in the head of Eftud2^ncc−/−; Trp53^ncc−/− embryos. While levels of Zmat3, a P53- regulated splicing factor, was similar to those of wild-type. Altogether, our data indicate that both P53-regulated and P53-independent pathways contribute to craniofacial malformations and death of Eftud2^ncc−/− embryos.

Spliceosomopathies and neurocristopathies: Two sides of the same coin?

Mutations in core components of the spliceosome are responsible for a group of syndromes collectively known as spliceosomopathies. Patients exhibit microcephaly, micrognathia, malar hypoplasia, external ear anomalies, eye anomalies, psychomotor delay, intellectual disability, limb, and heart defects. Craniofacial malformations in these patients are predominantly found in neural crest cells-derived structures of the face and head. Mutations in eight genes SNRPB, RNU4ATAC, SF3B4, PUF60, EFTUD2, TXNL4, EIF4A3, and CWC27 are associated with craniofacial spliceosomopathies. In this review, we provide a brief description of the normal development of the head and the face and an overview of mutations identified in genes associated with craniofacial spliceosomopathies. We also describe a model to explain how and when these mutations are most likely to impact neural crest cells. We speculate that mutations in a subset of core splicing factors lead to disrupted splicing in neural crest cells because these cells have increased sensitivity to inefficient splicing. Hence, disruption in splicing likely activates a cellular stress response that includes increased skipping of regulatory exons in genes such as MDM2 and MDM4, key regulators of P53. This would result in P53-associated death of neural crest cells and consequently craniofacial malformations associated with spliceosomopathies.

Developmental processes regulate craniofacial variation in disease and evolution

Variation in development mediates phenotypic differences observed in evolution and disease. Although the mechanisms underlying phenotypic variation are still largely unknown, recent research suggests that variation in developmental processes may play a key role. Developmental processes mediate genotype-phenotype relationships and consequently play an important role regulating phenotypes. In this review, we provide an example of how shared and interacting developmental processes may explain convergence of phenotypes in spliceosomopathies and ribosomopathies. These data also suggest a shared pathway to disease treatment. We then discuss three major mechanisms that contribute to variation in developmental processes: genetic background (gene-gene interactions), gene-environment interactions, and developmental stochasticity. Finally, we comment on evolutionary alterations to developmental processes, and the evolution of disease buffering mechanisms.