Non-celiac Enteropathy and Olmesartan: An Essential Consideration

Emerging evidence has shed light on non-celiac causes of enteropathy in recent years, presenting a diagnostic challenge for clinicians. This study discusses the diagnostic challenges related to non-celiac enteropathy, specifically focusing on olmesartan-induced enteropathy (OIE). A 73-year-old lady presented to the emergency department with a six-month history of watery diarrhea exacerbated by food intake and significant weight loss. The patient at admission was found to be dehydrated with severe hypokalemia and hypocalcemia. The extensive testing that was performed was unremarkable, including celiac disease panel, enteric panel, ova and parasites, Clostridium difficile, fecal calprotectin, and computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis. A significant electrolyte imbalance was corrected at admission, and subsequent upper endoscopy investigation with duodenal biopsies revealed moderate to severe villi blunting with a significant intraepithelial infiltrate of CD3+ lymphocytes. A colonoscopy that was performed at the same time was unremarkable, with negative biopsies for microscopic colitis. Given the suspicion of OIE, olmesartan was discontinued. One-month follow-up revealed resolution of malabsorption, with electrolyte normalization and duodenal biopsies showing improved duodenitis. This study emphasizes the importance of considering medication history and ruling out other potential causes of enteropathy. Olmesartan is an angiotensin II receptor antagonist that is commonly prescribed for hypertension. However, in rare cases, it may induce enteropathy, which often remains underdiagnosed. This rare side effect may present as chronic diarrhea, weight loss, and signs of malabsorption. Interestingly, OIE presents with overlapping clinical and histopathological features to celiac disease and, therefore, may mislead physicians to an extensive diagnostic investigation. Greater awareness of medication-related diarrheal syndromes such as OIE should be promoted, given that simple discontinuation of the medication can lead to dramatic clinical improvement.

Candesartan-Induced Enteropathy That Mimics Celiac Disease in a 90-Year-Old Patient

Sprue-like enteropathy (SLE) is a clinical syndrome similar to celiac disease and has been associated with the use of various angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), a class of medications frequently used in the management of hypertension. Currently, there has only been one documented case report which has observed this occurrence with the use of the ARB candesartan. A 90-year-old female patient presented with chronic diarrhea and weight loss of unclear etiology. Diagnostic esophagogastroduodenoscopy and ileocolonoscopy were macroscopically unremarkable, but histological samples revealed complete villous atrophy, chronic mucosal inflammation, and intraepithelial T-lymphocytic infiltration. However, serological studies could not confirm celiac disease as a cause for the patient’s symptoms of malabsorption. After exclusion of other intestinal inflammation etiologies with noted ongoing candesartan use, the diagnosis of SLE was made, and candesartan therapy was discontinued. Additionally, we decided to initiate a lactose-free diet. Clinical remission was achieved without any recurrences. Candesartan is a commonly prescribed therapeutic agent in the treatment of hypertension. Our case underlines the importance of considering it as a potential cause for unexplained symptoms of malabsorption.

Olmesartan-Induced Enteropathy: A Report of an Unusual Cause of Chronic Diarrhea

Olmesartan, an angiotensin II receptor blocker indicated in the treatment of hypertension, has been associ­ated with a seronegative sprue-like enteropathy that should be considered in the differential diagnosis of patients with unexplained chronic diarrhoea. It typically presents with severe chronic diarrhoea, considerable weight loss, and villous atrophy on biopsy and may be difficult to recognize because of its clinical and histological similarities to other clinical entities. Practically, discontinuation of the drug leads to dramatic recovery of the symptoms. We report a 76-year-old Caucasian female who was admitted to our hospital with complaints of chronic diarrhea and significant weight loss. Medical history was notable for hypertension being treated with olmesartan. Initially, investigation for all potential infectious causes and celiac disease was negative. Both upper and lower endoscopy was performed with duodenal biopsies revealing total villous atrophy and colonic biopsies showing lymphocytic colitis. In the presence of negative serology for celiac disease and after a thorough review of the patient’s medications, olmesartan in­duced-enteropathy was the most possible diagnosis. Olmesartan was discontinued and the symptoms rapidly resolved. A follow-up done a few months later showed no recurrence of the symptoms. In olmesartan-associated enteropathy, discontinuation of olmesartan results in immediate clinical recovery. Although rare, it is considered an emerging and underdiagnosed enteropathy. This case report illustrates the need for a thorough medication history evaluation and regular review during workup. We aim to increase the awareness of olmesartan-induced enteropathy among clinicians and gastroenterologists. We hope it will add to the current literature and help to understand this rare phenomenon in order to avoid unnecessary testing.

Sprue-Like Enteropathy and Liver Injury: A Rare Emerging Association with Olmesartan

Olmesartan-induced enteropathy is an underreported phenomenon, first described in 2012. While olmesartan's antihypertensive properties were confirmed early on, its association with a sprue-like enteropathy was subsequently noted. Although this association has been reported with olmesartan, there have been few reports of this association with other angiotensin-receptor blockers. We present a case of a 79-year-old male who presented with diarrhea, weight loss, jaundice, and transaminitis. Further history revealed that he had been taking olmesartan 40 mg daily for hypertension. Workup of his diarrhea and jaundice included duodenal and liver biopsies revealed findings consistent with a sprue-like enteropathy and an autoimmune hepatitis-like pattern. On discontinuation of olmesartan, his 1-month follow-up revealed significant improvement in his clinical status as well as his liver function tests. Olmesartan is an effective antihypertensive medication; however, physicians must be mindful of its side effect of causing a sprue-like enteropathy and liver injury. Patients should be counseled on discontinuing olmesartan, and they should be started on an alternative therapy for hypertension.

Telmisartan-induced sprue-like enteropathy: a case report

A possible case of sprue-like enteropathy (SLE) induced by the use of telmisartan is reported. Telmisartan is an angiotensin-receptor II blocker (type 1) used for the treatment of hypertension. Several cases of SLE associated with olmesartan and other drugs of the same group have been reported. In all cases, SLE resolved following therapy withdrawal. We describe the case of an 80-year-old woman who presented with diarrhoea and abdominal pain. In the past 5 years she had been treated with telmisartan 40 mg once a day for hypertension, so we hypothesised that symptoms might be caused by telmisartan. After treatment discontinuation, diarrhoea disappeared. Three causality algorithms were applied and revealed a possible or likely causal relationship. At present, the patient remains asymptomatic. There is a causal relationship between the use of telmisartan and SLE. This association should be taken into account by physicians when prescribing and reviewing drug therapies.

Olmesartan Associated Enteropathy: Usefulness of Video Capsule Endoscopy in a Case With Doubtful Upper Endoscopic/Histological Picture

BACKGROUND

Olmesartan, an antihypertensive drug, may be associated with a severe "sprue-like enteropathy".

OBJECTIVES

To report a case of Olmesartan enteropathy demonstrated by video capsule endoscopy distally from the second duodenum along with the whole small bowel before and after drug withdrawal.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 81-years-old man was referred for asthenia, chronic watery diarrhea and anasarca (ascites, pleural effusion and edemas of superior and inferior limb). The only comorbidity was hypertension treated with Olmesartan. All causes of infective and inflammatory chronic diarrhea were investigated and excluded. Upper endoscopy was normal; histological examination of the second portion of the duodenum showed moderate and patchy infiltration of lymphocytes at mucosal and intra-epithelial level with intermittent partial villous atrophy. The possibility of adverse drug reaction, estimated by Naranjo scale, showed a score of 7, indicating a strong probability. Olmesartan was then withdrawn. However, because of severe clinical general condition, we preferred to corroborate our diagnostic work-up by a non-invasive investigation, i.e. video capsule endoscopy, which showed jejunal and ileal mucosal alterations (mosaic pattern, diffuse hyperemia, severe edema, consequent apparent reduced lumen, diffuse thickening of intestinal folds, multiple erosions, patchy lymphangectasia). After 14 days, the resolution of anasarcatic state and hydroelectrolytic imbalances was observed. Nine months later, small-bowel video-capsule demonstrated mild mucosal hyperaemia and mosaic pattern.

CONCLUSION

Our case could give new insights in the field of Olmesartan associated enteropathy by highlighting the possibility of distally main lesion location and, therefore, the usefulness of video capsule endoscopy in the presence of doubtful diagnostic features.

Severe intestinal malabsorption associated with ACE inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker treatment. An observational cohort study in Germany and Italy

Purpose

The angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) olmesartan has been recently associated with sprue‐like enteropathy (SLE), a gastrointestinal condition characterized by intestinal malabsorption (IM) and severe diarrhea. Whether the increased risk of SLE is substance‐specific or a class effect involving all ARBs is uncertain. The aim of this study is to assess the risk of enteropathy associated with ARBs and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE‐i) by using data from large administrative and claim databases.

Methods

We obtained data from Italian local health‐care units and a large German claim database and included patients treated with olmesartan, other ARBs, and ACE‐i. In the absence of a specific diagnosis code for SLE, International Classification of Diseases codes for IM were used. Analysis implemented a Poisson regression with robust error variance procedure, which allowed accounting for different clusters (local health‐care units and countries) and correctly estimating the standard error for the relative risk of rare event occurrence.

Results

Patients were divided into 3 groups: olmesartan (25.591, 5.5%), other ARBs (104.901, 22.5%), and ACE‐i patients (334.951, 72.0%). Baseline characteristics were similar overall. The incidence of unspecified IM in ACE‐i patients was not different compared with that of olmesartan, whereas a higher rate ratio was observed when comparing ARB patients with the olmesartan group (RR: 2.50, 95% CI 1.21 to 5.19, P .01). When International Classification of Diseases codes for coeliac disease were included, no differences were observed.

Conclusions

We could not confirm previous findings of a higher risk of malabsorption in olmesartan‐only patients, and drug‐induced enteropathy should be considered the result of exposure to the class of ARBs rather than a specific drug‐related effect.

Unspecified intestinal malabsorption in patients treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers: a retrospective analysis in primary care settings

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the possible relationship between the use of Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers (ARBs) or Angiotensin-Converting-Enzyme Inhibitors (ACE-i) and unspecified intestinal malabsorption (IM) within the Italian and German real-life context.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

a retrospective cohort of patients with a new unspecified IM diagnosis during the period 1 January 2010-31 December 2013 was extracted from Italian IMS Health Longitudinal Patient Database and German IMS Disease Analyzer. Only patients with at least one prescription of ARB or ACE-i medication during the 6 months preceding the IM diagnosis were included and then followed up for 12 months to assess treatment exposure.

RESULTS

After stratification by year and molecule, the proportion of patients experiencing an unspecified IM diagnosis on total patients receiving ARBs or ACE-i ranged from 0% to 0.14%, showing no relevant differences between molecules and no time trends.

CONCLUSIONS

this study indicates that ACE-i or ARBs were rarely associated to an unspecified IM diagnosis. No relevant difference between each specific ACE-i and ARB was highlighted.