Outcomes of Incidental Durotomy Repair in Thoracolumbar Spine Surgery: An Institutional Experience With Orthopedic Residents

Background The occurrence of incidental durotomies (IDs) following spinal operations is a widely recognized issue. Complications such as poor outcomes, extended hospitalization, prolonged immobilization, infections, and revision surgeries are all potential consequences of inadequate durotomy management during the initial surgery. This study aims to describe the outcomes of ID repair in thoracolumbar spine surgery in terms of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score and visual analog scale (VAS) when performed with the active involvement of orthopedic residents in the surgical procedure. Methodology Between April 2021 and April 2023, a hospital-based observational study was conducted among 110 patients hospitalized in the orthopedic ward at R.L. Jalappa Hospital and Research Center in Kolar, Karnataka, who required IDs due to an accidental dural tear or a postoperative CSF fluid leak following thoracolumbar spine procedures. Patients with a previous history of thoracolumbar spine surgery, vertebral tumors, spinal metastasis, infections, e.g., spondylodiscitis, or Pott's spine were excluded. The ODI score and VAS score were calculated on the postoperative day, one month, and three months following surgery. Results The mean age of the study participants was 62.81 + 10.49 years, with a male preponderance of 67.2% among the study participants. The mean BMI of study participants was 23.77 kg/m2. Approximately 24.5% of participants had a prior history of spinal surgery. Among 110 patients, 32 had postoperative complications. Six patients reported experiencing urinary retention, followed by five with CSF leakage and one with a postural headache (five cases). Based on the ODI score, mild disability was seen in 32.7% of the study samples at three months of follow-up. Based on the VAS score, moderate pain was seen among all the study samples at three months of follow-up. The ANOVA test revealed statistically significant differences in ODI and VAS score reductions between the immediate postoperative period and the one-month and three-month follow-up periods (p = 0.001 and p = 0.0247, respectively). Conclusion Less than one-third of the samples had postoperative complications. At three months, ODI scores showed mild disability in one-third of the study samples. At three months, all study samples had moderate VAS pain. The improvement in ODI and VAS scores from the day after surgery through the one-month and three-month follow-up periods was statistically significant.

The Risk of Venous Thromboembolism after Thoracolumbar Spine Surgery: A Population-Based Cohort Study

Background: Although venous thromboembolism (VTE) is rare, including deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), it is a catastrophic complication after spinal surgery. This study was aimed to investigate the risk factors and incidence of VTE after thoracolumbar spine surgery (TLSS). Methods: We retrieved the data of 8697 patients >20 years old who underwent TLSS between 2000 and 2013 from Taiwan’s Longitudinal Health Insurance Database 2000. Each patient was randomly frequency-matched with four individuals who did not undergo TLSS by age, sex, and index year (the control group). Results: The incidence rates of VTE in the TLSS and control groups were 1.84 and 0.69 per 1000 person-years, respectively. The TLSS group had a higher VTE risk (adjusted HR (aHR): 2.13, 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1.41−3.21), DVT (aHR: 2.20, 95%CI: 1.40−3.46), and PE (aHR: 1.60, 95%CI: 0.68−3.78) than the control group. The correlated risk factors of VTE included older age (50−64 years: aHR: 2.16, 95%CI: 1.14−4.09; ≥65 years: aHR: 3.18, 95%CI: 1.65−6.13), a history of cancer (aHR: 2.96, 95%CI: 1.58−5.54), heart failure (aHR: 2.19, 95%CI: 1.27−3.78), and chronic kidney disease (aHR: 1.83, 95%CI: 1.18−2.83). Conclusions: The overall VTE risk following TLSS was less than 2% but correlated with certain risk factors. This information could help the spine surgeon help the patient prevent this fatal complication.

Analysis of Postoperative Thoracolumbar Spine Infections in a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Using the Centers for Disease Control Surgical Site Infection Criteria

INTRODUCTION

Wound infections following spinal surgery place a high toll on both the patient and the healthcare system. Although several large series studies have examined the incidence and distribution of spinal wound infection, the applicability of these studies varies greatly since nearly every study is either retrospective and/or lacks standard inclusion criteria for defining surgical site infection. To address this void, we present results from prospectively gathered thoracolumbar spine surgery data for which the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) criteria were stringently applied to define a surgical site infection (SSI).

METHODS

A prospective randomized trial of 314 patients who underwent multilevel thoracolumbar spinal surgery with instrumentation followed by postoperative drain placement was completed (Takemoto et al., 2015). The trial consisted of two antibiotic arms: one for 24-hours, and the other for the duration of the drain; no differences were found between the arms. All infections meeting CDC criteria for SSI were included.

RESULTS

A total of 40 infections met CDC criteria for SSI, for an overall incidence of 12.7%. Of these, 20 (50%) were culture-positive. The most common organism was Staphylococcus aureus (4 total: methicillin-sensitive=2; methicillin-resistant=2), followed by coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (3 cases), Propionibacterium acnes and Escherichia coli (2 cases each). Six infections grew multiple organisms, most commonly involving coagulase-negative staphylococcus and enterococcus.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that thoracolumbar SSI occurs at the higher end of the range cited in the literature (2-13%), which is largely based on retrospective data not subjected to the inclusivity of SSI as defined by the CDC. The three most common organisms in our analysis (S. aureus, P. acnes, E. coli) are consistent with previous reports. Staphylococcus aureus continues to be the most common causative organism and continued vigilance and searching for preventive measures need to be a high priority. This study provides Level I evidence.