Costs associated with adverse events during treatment episodes for adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

OBJECTIVE

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medication is frequently associated with adverse events (AEs), but limited real-world data exist regarding their costs from a payer's perspective. Therefore, this study evaluated the healthcare costs associated with common AEs among adult patients treated for ADHD in the US.

METHODS

Eligible adults treated for ADHD were identified from a large US claims database (1 October 2015-30 September 2021). A retrospective cohort study design was used to assess excess healthcare costs and costs directly related to AE-specific claims per-patient-per-month (PPPM) associated with 10 selected AEs during ADHD treatment. To account for all costs associated with the AE, treatment episodes with a given AE were compared to similar treatment episodes without this AE. Entropy balancing was used to create cohorts with similar characteristics. Studied AEs were selected based on their prevalence in clinical trials for common ADHD medications and were identified from ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes recorded in claims.

RESULTS

Among the 461,464 patients included (mean age: 34.2 years; 45.5% males), 49.4% had ≥1 AE during their treatment episode. Treatment episodes with AEs were associated with statistically significant AE-specific medical costs (erectile dysfunction: $57; fatigue: $82; dry mouth: $90; diarrhea: $162; insomnia: $147; anxiety: $281; nausea: $299; constipation: $356; urinary hesitation: $491; feeling jittery: $723) and excess healthcare costs PPPM (erectile dysfunction: $120, fatigue: $248, insomnia: $265, anxiety: $380, diarrhea: $441, dry mouth: $485, nausea: $709, constipation: $802, urinary hesitation: $1,105, feeling jittery: $1,160; p < .05).

LIMITATIONS

AEs were identified based on recorded diagnosis on medical claims and likely represent more severe AEs. Therefore, costs may not be representative of milder AEs.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found that AEs occurring during ADHD treatment episodes are associated with significant healthcare costs. This highlights the potential of treatments with favorable safety profiles to alleviate the burden experienced by patients and the healthcare system.

Adherence and Persistence to Long-Acting Anticholinergics Treatment Episodes in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

BACKGROUND

No studies have examined adherence or persistence to long-acting anticholinergics (LAAC) treatment episodes in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

OBJECTIVE

To estimate 1-year adherence and 5-year persistence to LAAC during treatment episodes, and the likelihood of initiating a subsequent treatment episode.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort of LAAC-treated COPD patients was reconstructed from Quebec databases. A treatment episode was initiated at cohort entry, defined as the first LAAC prescription date on/after the first COPD diagnosis date recorded between October 1, 2003, and March 31, 2014. We identified a subsequent treatment episode up to 5 years after the end of the episode initiated at cohort entry. We measured adherence as the proportion of days covered over 1 year. Persistence was defined as prescription renewal within 90 days of the previous prescription and was plotted using Kaplan-Meier curves over 5 years. The 5-year hazard and cumulative incidence of initiating a subsequent episode were estimated with survival analyses. We compared adherence and persistence between the treatment episodes using t and log-rank tests.

RESULTS

The cohort included 113 435 COPD patients. Adherence and persistence to LAAC were significantly lower in the subsequent treatment episode (55% vs 63%; P < 0.0001). The likelihood of initiating a subsequent episode was greatest immediately after the cessation of the initial episode, with 59% of patients starting a subsequent episode within 1 year.

CONCLUSION

Adherence and persistence to LAAC were lower in the subsequent treatment episode. Interventions should be offered quickly after LAAC cessation.

An alternative approach to measuring treatment persistence with antipsychotic agents among patients with schizophrenia in the Veterans Health Administration

Prior studies have demonstrated the importance of treatment persistence with anti-psychotic agents in sustaining control of schizophrenic symptoms. However, the conventional approach in measuring treatment persistence tended to use only the first prescription episode even though some patients received multiple prescriptions (or multiple treatment episodes) of the same medication within one year following the initiation of the index drug. In this study, we used data from the Veterans Health Administration in the United States to assess the extent to which patients received multiple prescriptions. The study found that about a quarter of the patients had two or more treatment episodes and that levels of treatment persistence tended to vary across treatment episodes. Based on these results, we offered an alternative approach in which we calculated treatment persistence with typical and atypical antipsychotic agents separately for patients with one, two, or three treatment episodes. Considering that patients with different number of treatment episodes might differ in disease profiles, this treatment episode-specific approach offered a fair comparison of the levels of treatment persistence across patients with different number of treatment episodes. Future research needs to extend the analyses beyond two antipsychotic classes to individual antipsychotic agents. A more comprehensive assessment using appropriate analytic methods should help physicians make prescription choices that will ultimately improve the care of patients with schizophrenia.