Effects of atrial electromechanical delay and ventriculoatrial conduction over the atrial functions in patients with frequent extrasystole and preserved ejection fraction

BACKGROUND

The deterioration of left atrial and ventricular functions was demonstrated in patients with frequent ventricular extrasystole (fVES). The exact pathophysiology of left atrial dysfunction in patients with fVES is unclear. Retrograde ventriculoatrial conduction (VAC) often accompanies fVES, which may contribute to atrial dysfunction. We investigated whether atrial electromechanical delay and VAC are related to these atrial functions in patients with frequent right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) VES and preserved ejection fraction (pEF).

METHODS

This study included 21 patients with pEF (eight males, 48 ± 11 years), who had experienced more than 10 000 RVOT-VES during 24-h Holter monitoring and had undergone electrophysiological study/ablation. The study also included 20 healthy age- and sex-matched control subjects. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed on all of the subjects. Atrial conduction time was obtained by using tissue Doppler imaging. Strain analysis was performed with two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography.

RESULTS

The peak atrial longitudinal strain was significantly impaired in patients with fVES (P = 0.01). In addition, although the interatrial and left atrial conduction delay times were significantly different between each group (P < 0.001, P < 0.001), the right atrial conduction delay times were similar. When patients with fVES were divided into groups depending on the existence of retrograde VAC, atrial deformation parameters and conduction delay time did not significantly differ between either group.

CONCLUSION

Frequent RVOT-VES causes left atrial dysfunction. This information is obtained through strain analyses and recordings of left atrial conduction times in patients with pEF. Regardless, retrograde VAC is not related to atrial dysfunction.

Recovery of Ventriculo-Atrial Conduction after Adrenaline in Patients Implanted with Pacemakers

BACKGROUND

Ventriculo-atrial (VA) conduction can have negative consequences for patients with implanted pacemakers and defibrillators. There is concern whether impaired VA conduction could recover during stressful situations. Although the influence of isoproterenol and atropine are well established, the effect of adrenaline has not been studied systematically. The objective of this study was to determine if adrenaline can facilitate recovery of VA conduction in patients implanted with pacemakers.

METHODS

A prospective study was conducted on 61 consecutive patients during a 4-month period (April-July 2014). The presence of VA conduction was assessed during the pacemaker implantation procedure. In case of an impaired VA conduction, adrenaline infusio was used as a stress surrogate to test conduction recovery.

RESULTS

The indications for pacemaker implantation were: sinus node dysfunction in 18 patients, atrioventricular (AV) block in 40 patients, binodal dysfunction (sinus node+ AV node) in two patients and other (carotid sinus syndrome) in one patient. In the basal state, 15/61 (24.6%) presented spontaneous VA conduction and 46/61 (75.4%) had no VA conduction. After administration of adrenaline, there was VA conduction recovery in 5/46 (10.9%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Adrenaline infusion produced recovery of VA conduction in 10.9% of patients with absent VA conduction in a basal state. Recovery of VA conduction during physiological or pathological stresses could be responsible for the pacemaker syndrome, PMT episodes, or certain implantable cardiac defibrillator detection issues.