Analgesia in Transcutaneous Laryngeal Botulinum Toxin Injections: A Randomized Crossover Trial

OBJECTIVES

There is an absence of data in the literature regarding methods to improve the patient experience during the performance of awake in-office laryngeal injections. This study sought to evaluate whether the use of local anesthetic or a vibrating instrument decreased overall pain experienced by patients with laryngeal dystonia, frequently referred to as spasmodic dysphonia (SD), undergoing transcervical botulinum toxin injections.

METHODS

This was an unblinded, prospective randomized control trial with a crossover design where each patient received transcutaneous transcricothyroid injection of botulinum toxin with alternating use of no anesthesia, local anesthesia (2% lidocaine in 1:100,000 epinephrine), and vibrating instrument in three consecutive laryngeal injections to treat adductor SD. Patients were randomized to the order they received these treatments. Patients measured pain on a 0-10 visual analogue scale (VAS) and selected their preferred technique after receiving all three analgesic modalities.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients completed the study. There was no statistically significant difference in pain between the three analgesic techniques (p = 0.38). The most preferred analgesic technique was the vibrating wand (44% (14/32)). Lidocaine was the second most preferred (37% (12/32)) and 19% (6/32) of patients preferred nothing. When combining the wand and nothing groups, 63% of patients preferred one of these two methods (95% exact CI: 44%-79%).

CONCLUSION

There was no statistically significant difference in median pain experienced by patients during laryngeal botulinum toxin injection between these different analgesic modalities. More than half of the patients selected a preference for a technique that did not include lidocaine. This data supports individualization of analgesia during transcutaneous laryngeal injections.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2 Laryngoscope, 134:2277-2281, 2024.

Voice Improvement After Essential Tremor Treatment via Focused Ultrasound and Deep Brain Stimulation

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of this study was to determine whether two neurosurgical procedures, deep brain stimulation (DBS) and focused ultrasound (FUS), to treat essential tremor (ET) of the upper limb also reduce vocal tremor (VT) in patients with comorbid dysphonia.

METHODS

Twelve patients with ET and concomitant VT scheduled for neurosurgical intervention (FUS or DBS) or returning for follow-up after DBS implantation were assessed. FUS patients were assessed pre- and post-intervention and DBS patients were assessed with the electrodes turned on and off post-implantation. Three voice recordings of a sustained /a/ were obtained for each participant condition. Percent fundamental frequency variability (FFV) was calculated for each recorded sustained vowel. Additionally, blinded expert perceptual VT rating (VTR) was performed to assess subjective changes in tremors.

RESULTS

Of the 12 patients, seven underwent unilateral FUS, and five underwent bilateral DBS. Mean FFV without neurosurgical intervention was 18.3%, SD = 7.8 and with neurosurgical intervention was 6.3%, SD = 3.0 (t (70) =8.7, p < 0.001). Mean FFV decreased in the FUS cohort from 22.0%, SD = 7.1 pre-ablation to 6.7%, SD = 2.4 post-ablation (t (40) = 7.7, p < 0.001). Mean FFV also decreased in the DBS cohort from 15.7%, SD = 7.0 to 6.0%, SD = 3.3 when stimulation was turned on (t (28)=5.7 p < 0.001). In the FUS group, mean VTR decreased from 4.0 to 1.4 post-ablation (Z = 7.8, p < 0.001). In the DBS group, mean VTR decreased from 3.3 to 2.1 with stimulation (Z = 4.1, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Neurosurgical interventions for ET (bilateral DBS and unilateral FUS) demonstrate acoustic and perceptual benefits for VT.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 134:367-373, 2024.

Treatment of vocal tremor with bilateral magnetic resonance imaging-guided focused ultrasound of the ventral intermediate thalamic nucleus: illustrative case

BACKGROUND

Essential vocal tremor is a difficult disease entity to treat with a poor response to existing medical management and limited options for surgical management of the disease. Magnetic resonance imaging-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) is an emerging treatment modality with encouraging results for limb tremor in patients with essential tremor, but data are limited for the treatment of vocal tremor.

OBSERVATIONS

This is the case of a 69-year-old male with a history of essential vocal tremor severely limiting his ability to perform his occupation as an opera singer. He underwent staged bilateral ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus thalamotomy with MRgFUS for the treatment of his bilateral upper extremity tremor with near complete resolution of his vocal tremor after a second procedure.

LESSONS

Bilateral MRgFUS may be a safe and efficacious option for the treatment of essential vocal tremor. Further research into optimal patient selection, precise target location, and treatment parameters is needed.

Exploring Patient's Preference of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Laryngeal Movement Disorders

BACKGROUND

Despite many available patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for laryngeal movement disorders, there is a lack of patient input regarding which PROM most accurately and conveniently captures aspects related to their vocal disease. This study aimed to assess patients' preferences among a selection of voice-related PROMs (Voice Handicap Index-10 [VHI-10], OMNI-Vocal Effort Scale [OMNI-VES], Communicative Participation Item Bank-General Short Form [CPIB-10], and Visual Analog Scales [VAS]) within the laryngeal movement disorder population and investigate associations between selected instruments.

METHODS

Prior to botulinum toxin A injection, patients with laryngeal dystonia and/or essential tremor of the vocal tract were administered the VHI-10, OMNI-VES, CPIB-10, and three novel VAS questions in a randomized order. Patients rank ordered the four PROMs based on the PROMs' reflection of their voice problems. Pearson's correlation coefficients evaluated pairwise associations among PROM scores. Fisher's exact test compared the preferred PROM rankings.

RESULTS

Seventy patients (53 female, mean age = 60.7 years) participated. The VHI-10 and CPIB-10 were most preferred at 33.9% and 27.4% respectively. The OMNI-VES and VAS scales were less favored (19.4%, each). When analyzed by age ≥60 years, the CPIB-10 was most favored (33.3%), but for age <60 years, VHI-10 was most preferred (42.3%). There was a strong correlation between scores of all administered PROMs (strongest correlation between OMNI-VES and VAS, r = 0.8, p < 0.001; the weakest correlation between OMNI-VES and VHI-10, r = 0.6, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

With an increasing trend in PROMs usage and a strong correlation between all evaluated outcome instruments, insight regarding patients' PROM preferences is an area for further consideration.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA Laryngoscope, 133:1448-1454, 2023.

Classification of vocal tremor using updated consensus-based tremor classification criteria

OBJECTIVES

This study characterized the clinical phenotypes of individuals with vocal tremor (VT) using tremor classification criteria published by the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society (IPMDS) including laryngeal features from the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS).

METHODS

VT phenotypic descriptors were extracted from participant medical records from 2017 to 2019. Clinical phenotype descriptors included the: (a) chief complaint and discipline for the first appointment, (b) demographics, (c) tremor body distribution, condition, frequency, and progression, (d) exacerbating/alleviating factors, (e) treatment approaches, and (g) neurologic comorbidities. Descriptive statistics were conducted.

RESULTS

Of 179 meeting inclusion criteria, 2/3 were female; tremor onset affected voice (43%) or extremity (32%) and 2/3 were documented with tremor duration of 3 years or more. Those with primary VT first saw otolaryngology or speech language pathology (59%), whereas those with primary extremity/head tremor first saw neurology (36%). Documentation commonly omitted tremor clinical features such as (a) observed conditions of tremor (64%), (b) laryngeal features (64%), and (c) tremor frequency (92%). Thus, VT classification was based on comorbidity in 49% of patients (ie, essential tremor (48%), dystonia (72%), and Parkinson's disease (100%)) and 32% had inadequate documentation to classify.

CONCLUSION

The majority of individuals with VT were unable to be classified based on documented clinical features highlighting the need for consistent multidisciplinary assessment of tremor affecting speech structures. The primary site of tremor determined the first discipline seen. Most commonly classified VT categories included essential tremor (47%), dystonia (28%), Parkinsonism (7%), and isolated VT (19%).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

A Case of Ertapenem Neurotoxicity Resulting in Vocal Tremor and Altered Mentation in a Dialysis Dependent Liver Transplant Patient

Carbapenem agents are advanced derivatives of cephalosporins that are active against bacteria that produce extended spectrum beta lactamases (ESBL). These antibiotics are resistant to enzymatic cleavage, and have good central nervous system penetration. Given this fact, it is not surprising that these drugs have been reported to cause neurological side effects like seizures and encephalopathy. We report a case of a patient on hemodialytic support who had a notable change in mentation and vocal tremor. This was at first attributed to calcineurin toxicity, but after the finding of a normal tacrolimus level, ertapenem neurotoxicity was suspected. After discontinuation of the offending agent, the patient’s vocal tremor, cognition, and neurological function returned to baseline levels.

Comparison of botulinum toxin and propranolol for essential and dystonic vocal tremors

OBJECTIVES

Vocal tremors, which cause social difficulties for patients, may be classified as resting or action tremors. Of the vocal action tremors, essential and dystonic tremors are the most common. Botulinum toxin and oral medications have been used to treat vocal tremors, but no comparative clinical trials have been performed. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of botulinum toxin injection and the oral administration of propranolol in the treatment of essential and dystonic vocal tremors.

METHODS

This clinical trial recruited 15 patients, divided into essential and dystonic vocal tremor groups. Patients in both groups received successive treatment with botulinum toxin and propranolol. The treatments were administered at different times; the order of treatment was randomly selected. Patients were assessed with flexible nasofibrolaryngoscopy and with perceptual and acoustic voice evaluations. A statistical significance level of 0.05 (5%) was used.

RESULTS

Botulinum toxin produced statistically significant improvements in perceptual measures of vocal instability in patients with dystonic vocal tremors compared with baseline values and treatment with propranolol. The acoustic measure of variability in the fundamental frequency was significantly lower in patients with dystonic vocal tremors after treatment with botulinum toxin.

CONCLUSION

Essential and dystonic vocal tremors responded differently to treatment. Dystonic vocal tremors responded significantly to treatment with botulinum toxin but not oral propranolol. Essential vocal tremors did not respond significantly to either treatment, perhaps due to the small number of patients, which is a limitation of this research.

Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for Essential Tremor Also Reduces Voice Tremor

OBJECTIVE

Voice tremor is a common feature of essential tremor (ET) that is difficult to treat medically and significantly affects quality of life. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventral intermediate nucleus (Vim) of the thalamus is effective in improving contralateral distal limb tremor and has been shown in limited studies to affect voice tremor. Our objective was to retrospectively evaluate whether Vim-DBS used to treat patients with essential motor tremor also effectively treated underlying concurrent voice tremor and assess whether particular lead locations were favorable for treating vocal tremor.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, patients had unilateral or bilateral lead placement and were monitored for up to 12 months. We used the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin (FTM) subscore to assess vocal tremor. Changes in vocal tremor before and after stimulation and over several sessions were assessed.

RESULTS

Of the 77 patients who met the inclusion criteria and were treated for essential tremor, 20 (26%) patients had vocal tremor prior to stimulation. Active Vim-DBS decreased the amplitude of voice tremor by 80% (p < 0.001). The mean FTM score as 1.24 pre-operation, 1.08 post-implantation (consistent with a lesion effect), and 0.25 with stimulation. The effect magnitude was maintained at last follow-up with slight improvement over time (p < 0.05). Unilateral and bilateral stimulation resulted in similar degrees of tremor reduction. A model of the centroid of stimulation showed that Vim thalamic stimulation that is more anterior on average yielded better voice tremor control, significantly so on the left side (p < 0.05). Additionally, there was improvement in head, tongue, and face tremor scores (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Unilateral and bilateral Vim-DBS targeted to treat the motor component of essential tremor also dramatically decreased the amplitude of voice tremor in this group of patients, suggesting a potential benefit of this treatment for affected patients.

Chemodenervation of the Larynx

Botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) has existed for thousands of years; however, it was not medically utilized until investigations into its therapeutic use began in sincerity during the late 1970s and 1980s. This, coupled with the reclassification of spasmodic dysphonia as a focal dystonia, led to the use of chemodenervation for this disorder, which has since become a refined technique. Indeed, due to its safety and efficacy, BoNT has been investigated in multiple neurolaryngology disorders, including spasmodic dysphonia, vocal tremor, and muscle tension dysphonia. BoNT has been shown to be a useful and safe adjunct in the treatment for these disorders and may reduce or eliminate oral pharmacotherapy and/or prevent the need for a surgical intervention. We present the historical background, development, proposed mechanisms of action, uses, and techniques for administering BoNT for laryngeal disorders, with a particular focus on spasmodic dysphonia.