Von Willebrand disease type 2M: Correlation between genotype and phenotype

BACKGROUND

An appropriate clinical diagnosis of von Willebrand disease (VWD) can be challenging because of a variable bleeding pattern and laboratory phenotype. Genotyping is a powerful diagnostic tool and may have an essential role in the diagnostic field of VWD.

OBJECTIVES

To unravel the clinical and laboratory heterogeneity of genetically confirmed VWD type 2M patients and to investigate their relationship.

METHODS

Patients with a confirmed VWD type 2M genetic variant in the A1 or A3 domain of von Willebrand factor (VWF) and normal or only slightly aberrant VWF multimers were selected from all subjects genotyped at the Radboud university medical center because of a high suspicion of VWD. Bleeding scores and laboratory results were analyzed.

RESULTS

Fifty patients had a clinically relevant genetic variant in the A1 domain. Median bleeding score was 5. Compared with the nationwide Willebrand in the Netherlands study type 2 cohort, bleeding after surgery or delivery was reported more frequently and mucocutaneous bleedings less frequently. Median VWF activity/VWF antigen (VWF:Act/VWF:Ag) ratio was 0.32, whereas VWF collagen binding activity/VWF antigen (VWF:CB/VWF:Ag) ratio was 0.80. Variants in the A3 domain were only found in two patients with low to normal VWF:Act/VWF:Ag ratios (0.45, 1.03) and low VWF:CB/VWF:Ag ratios (0.45, 0.63).

CONCLUSION

Genetically confirmed VWD type 2M patients have a relatively mild clinical phenotype, except for bleeding after surgery and delivery. Laboratory phenotype is variable and depends on the underlying genetic variant. Addition of genotyping to the current phenotypic characterization may improve diagnosis and classification of VWD.

Evaluation of an heterogeneous group of patients with von Willebrand disease using an assay alternative to ristocetin induced platelet agglutination

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis of von Willebrand disease (VWD) type 2 usually relies on the discrepancy between the von Willebrand factor (VWF) ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo) and VWF antigen (VWF:Ag). Type 2B patients can be discriminated from other qualitative VWD variants by using ristocetin-induced platelet agglutination (RIPA) test. The major limitation of RIPA is the requirement of fresh blood sample.

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we evaluated the VWF gain-of-function mutant GPIb binding (VWF:GPIbM) and VWF:RCo assays to investigate whether the VWF:GPIbM/VWF:RCo ratio was able to identify the type 2B variant among an heterogeneous VWD population, previously characterized following the ISTH-SSC guidelines.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Seventy-six VWD patients and 31 healthy subjects were evaluated by using VWF:Ag, VWF:RCo, and VWF:GPIbM assays.

RESULTS

The mean (minimum-maximum values) VWF:GPIbM/VWF:RCo ratio was higher in type 2B patients (2.53, 0.84-6.11) than in healthy controls (1.05, 0.87-1.34), type 1 (0.85, 0.51-1.15), 2A (1.20, 0.36-2.82), and 2M (1.07, 0.91-1.38) (P < 0.0001). Type 2B variants were divided into four groups (A, B, C, and D) according to their different multimeric patterns. The mean value of the VWF:GPIbM/VWF:RCo ratio in the four groups showed an increasing trend from group A (1.08) to D (3.69), proportional to the loss of high molecular weight multimers. Among 32 type 2B patients, previously diagnosed with RIPA, 8 (mainly with a type I New York/Malmö phenotype) were not confirmed using the VWF:GPIbM/VWF:RCo ratio.

CONCLUSIONS

Whenever the RIPA test is not feasible, the VWF:GPIbM/VWF:RCo ratio might help to identify severe type 2B VWD patients.