Enalaprilat induced acute parotitis

Drug induced acute parotitis is a very uncommon complication reported with a few drugs only. There is no case of acute bilateral parotitis reported previously with i.v. enalaprilat. We present here a female patient who developed acute bilateral parotitis within minutes of i.v. enalaprilat injection and recovered within 24 hours of stopping the drug and with symptomatic treatment.

The effect of sublingual captopril versus intravenous enalaprilat on angiotensin II plasma levels

A 44-year-old woman, with a history of familial adenomatous polyposis, complicated by carcinoma of the colon, for which a proctocolectomy had been performed, now presented with metastasis located in the pancreas. Treatment consisted of chemotherapy followed by a partial pancreaticoduodenectomy. Due to ischemia, resection of the small intestines was performed the same day. After admission, a transesophageal echocardiography showed an ejection fraction of 40%. Because enteral administration of drugs was impossible, intravenous enalaprilat 2 mg once a day for 1 day followed by sublingual captopril 25 mg twice a day were started. Blood samples were taken before and after administration. After 1 day of sublingual captopril treatment the angiotensin II level decreased with more than 50%, comparable to the decrease seen after intravenous administration of enalaprilat. Sublingual captopril has been used in the treatment of hypertensive crisis and heart failure. Although frequently reported, no study has investigated the effect on angiotensin II levels after sublingual administration in heart failure patients. This case-report demonstrated that sublingual administration of 25 mg captopril twice a day yielded a considerable decrease in angiotensin II plasma levels which was comparable to the effect seen after an intravenous administration of 2 mg enalaprilat.

Effects of an angiotensin II receptor antagonist and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on burst forming units-erythroid in chronic hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have been reported to reduce the response to erythropoietin (EPO) administration in chronic hemodialysis patients, but the mechanism for this effect has not yet been clarified. To clarify the mechanism of ACE inhibitors- and angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonist-induced anemia in hemodialysis patients, we examined the effect of ACE inhibitors and AT1 receptor antagonist on burst-forming units-erythroid (BFU-E) in the peripheral blood of hemodialysis patients and healthy controls in vitro.

METHODS

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNCs) were isolated by gradient centrifugation from 10 patients on regular hemodialysis and 7 healthy control volunteers. A colony assay of hematopoietic progenitors was performed using the methylcellulose culture system. PBMNCs of 1 or 2 x 10(5) were plated in a medium containing EPO with various concentrations of ACE inhibitors or AT1 receptor antagonist and incubated for 14 days. Colonies of BFU-E were counted under an inverted microscope.

RESULTS

The PBMNCs from the chronic hemodialysis patients formed fewer BFU-Es than those from healthy volunteers. AT1 receptor antagonist in both healthy volunteers and hemodialysis patients suppressed the number of BFU-Es. The ACE inhibitors produced a smaller effect than the AT1 receptor antagonist.

CONCLUSION

AT1 receptor blockade can directly inhibit erythropoiesis in vitro.

Comparison of the pharmacokinetics of fosinoprilat with enalaprilat and lisinopril in patients with congestive heart failure and chronic renal insufficiency

AIMS

To compare the serum pharmacokinetics of fosinoprilat with enalaprilat and lisinopril after 1 and 10 days of dosing with fosinopril, enalapril and lisinopril.

METHODS

Patients with congestive heart failure (CHF, NYHA Class II-IV) and chronic renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance </=30 ml min-1 ) were randomized to receive fosinopril, enalapril or lisinopril in two parallel-group studies. In the first study 24 patients were treated with 10 mg fosinopril (n=12 patients) or 2.5 mg enalapril (n=12) every morning for 10 consecutive days. In the second study 31 patients were treated with 10 mg fosinopril (n=16 patients) or 5 mg lisinopril (n=15) every morning for 10 consecutive days. Samples of blood were collected for determination of pharmacokinetic parameters. The area under the curve (AUC) between the first and last days of treatment and the accumulation index (AI) were the primary outcome measures.

RESULTS

All three angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors exhibited a significant increase in AUC between the first and last days of treatment in both studies. The difference between the AI for fosinoprilat (1.41) and enalaprilat (1.96) was statistically significant (95% CI: 1.05, 1.84). Similarly, the difference between the AI for fosinoprilat (1.21) and lisinopril (2.76) was statistically significant (95% CI: 1.85, 2.69). All three ACE inhibitors completely inhibited serum ACE for 24 h. All treatments were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Fosinoprilat exhibits significantly less accumulation than enalaprilat or lisinopril in patients with CHF and renal insufficiency, most probably because fosinoprilat is eliminated by both the kidney and liver, and increased hepatic elimination can compensate for reduced renal clearance in patients with kidney dysfunction.

Bolus versus continuous low dose of enalaprilat in congestive heart failure with acute refractory decompensation

The first dose of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors may trigger a considerable fall of blood pressure in chronic heart failure. The response may be dose-related. To determine hemodynamic and systemic oxygenation effects of low-dose enalaprilat, we administered intravenous enalaprilat (0.004 mg/kg) as bolus (group B) or continuous 1-hour infusion (group C) in 20 patients with congestive heart failure due to ischemic heart disease with acute decompensation refractory to inotropic, vasodilator and diuretic therapy. Hemodynamic and systemic oxygenation variables were recorded at baseline (+0 min), +30, +60, +120, +180, and +360 min after the start of intervention. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) (p < 0. 001), mean pulmonary artery pressure (MPAP) (p < 0.001), pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP) (p < 0.001), oxygen extraction ratio (ER) (p < 0.026) decreased regardless of enalaprilat application. Compared to group B, there was in group C prolonged decrease of MAP, MPAP, PAOP, ER and increase of pulmonary artery oxyhemoglobin saturation in regard to baseline values. Cardiac index, heart rate, central venous pressure and oxygen consumption index did not change. A low dose of intravenous enalaprilat (0.004 mg/kg) can be used to safely improve hemodynamics and systemic oxygenation in congestive heart failure due to ischemic heart disease with acute refractory decompensation.

Plasma levels of enalaprilat in chronic therapy of heart failure: relationship to adverse events

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are established as first-line therapy in chronic heart failure (CHF). However, little is known about the dosage-plasma-level relationship of ACE inhibitors in CHF and its relation to drug-induced adverse effects. We investigated 45 patients (age 55 +/- 10 years) with stable CHF who presented with a maintenance dosage of enalapril of either 5 mg b.i.d. (E10, n = 16), 10 mg b.i.d. (E20, n = 18), or 20 mg b.i.d. (E40, n = 11). This dosage was changed three times to treat all patients with lower, higher, and, finally, the initial dosage for 4 weeks each. Patients were examined clinically, by questionnaire, and by spiroergometry. In addition, neurohormones (atrial and brain natriuretic peptide and norepinephrine), enalaprilat trough levels, and serum potassium and creatinine were measured. Enalaprilat trough levels differed significantly between the three groups at study entry but also varied markedly within each group. In addition to the dose of enalapril, serum creatinine, severity of CHF, basal metabolic rate, and body weight significantly influenced enalaprilat trough levels (R2 =.84, p <.001). Within-patient comparisons revealed that serum creatinine (107 +/- 26 versus 102 +/- 20 micromol/liter) and potassium (3.8 +/- 0.4 versus 3.7 +/- 0. 3mmol/liter) were higher, cough was more common (scored on a scale of 0-8: 1.7 +/- 2.1 versus 1.4 +/- 1.8), and blood pressure was lower (systolic, 112 +/- 14 versus 117 +/- 13 mm Hg; diastolic, 66 +/- 9 versus 69 +/- 11 mm Hg) on the highest than on the lowest enalaprilat trough level (all p <.05). Highly variable enalaprilat trough levels and the fact that adverse effects were more common on high enalaprilat trough levels provide a rationale for individually adjusting ACE-inhibitor dose in case of adverse effects.

[Sublingual nitroglycerin or intravenous enalaprilat in preclinical treatment of hypertensive patients with pulmonary edema]

In a prospectively designed randomized study, we compared the efficacy of sublingual nitroglycerine and intravenous enalaprilat in the out-of-hospital treatment of 46 hypertensive patients with pulmonary edema (defined as rales over both lungs and systolic blood pressure > 200 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure > 100 mg). The out-of-hospital treatment consists of oxygen (6 Ll/min) via a face mask, furosemide 80 mg i.v., opioids 10 mg s.c., and either sublingual nitroglycerine (n = 23; initial dose: 0.8 mg; repetitive application of 0.8 mg every 10 min until a cumulative dose of 3.2 mg) or intravenous enalaprilat (initial dose: 2.5 mg; repetitive application of 2.5 mg every 30 min until a cumulative dose of 10 mg). The aim of the antihypertensive treatment was a reduction of systolic blood pressure below 160 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure below 90 mm Hg until admission to the emergency department. In the emergency room, an arterial and venous blood sample was taken to determine the respiratory (pO2, pCO2) and metabolic status (pH value; base-excess; serum lactate) of the patient. Successful antihypertensive treatment was observed in 13/23 (57%) patients of the enalaprilat group and 15/23 (65%) patients of the nitroglycerine group (p = 0.54). Systolic and diastolic blood pressure on admission were similar in both treatment groups (systolic RR: enalaprilat: 179 [31] mm Hg; nitroglycerine: 184 [38] mm Hg; p = 0.59; diastolic RR: enalaprilat: 96 [14] mm Hg; nitroglycerine: 101 [14] mm Hg; p = 0.12). No significant differences were observed between the enalaprilat and the nitroglycerine groups concerning respiratory and metabolic parameters on admission (pO2: 67 [15] vs. 64 [17] mm Hg; p = 0.50; pCO2: 46 [9] vs. 47 [13]; p = 0.75; pH value: 7.27 [0.12] vs. 7.27 [0.09]; p = 0.98; BE: -4.2 [3.7] vs. -5.7 [4.1]; p = 0.23; lactate: 4.2 [3.3] vs. 4.2 [2.7]; p = 0.98). Intravenous enalaprilat did not exhibit any advantage compared to nitroglycerine in terms of blood pressure reduction or respiratory and metabolic parameters on admission to the emergency room. We conclude that enalaprilat is no substitute for nitroglycerine in the out-of-hospital treatment of hypertensive patients with pulmonary edema.

Des-Arg9-bradykinin metabolism in patients who presented hypersensitivity reactions during hemodialysis: role of serum ACE and aminopeptidase P

Bradykinin (BK) has been proposed as the principal mediator of hypersensitivity reactions (HSR) in patients dialyzed using negatively charged membranes and concomitantly treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. We investigated the metabolism of exogenous BK added to the sera of 13 patients dialyzed on an AN69 membrane with a history of HSR (HSR+ patients) and 10 others who did not present such a reaction (HSR- patients) while dialyzed under the same conditions. No significant difference in the t1/2 of BK was found between the patient groups. However, the t1/2 of generated des-Arg9-BK was significantly increased (2.2-fold) in HSR+ patients compared to HSR-subjects. Preincubation of the sera with an ACE inhibitor (enalaprilat) significantly increased the t1/2 of both BK and des-Arg9-BK in both groups. There was no significant difference between the groups with respect to the t1/2 of BK, but there was a significantly greater increase (3.8-fold) in the t1/2 of des-Arg9-BK in HSR+ patients compared to HSR-subjects. The level of serum aminopeptidase P (APP) activity showed a significant decrease in the HSR+ sera when compared to HSR-samples. In HSR- and HSR+ patients, a significant inverse relation (r2 = 0.6271; P < 0.00005) could be calculated between APP activity and des-Arg9-BK t1/2. In conclusion, HSR in hemodialyzed patients who are concomitantly treated with a negatively charged membrane and an ACE inhibitor can be considered as a multifactorial disease in that a decreased APP activity resulting in reduced degradation of des-Arg9-BK may lead to the accumulation of this B1 agonist that could be responsible, at least in part, for the signs and symptoms of HSR.

Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition has no effect on blood pressure and splanchnic perfusion after cardiac surgery

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to study the effect of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, enalaprilat, on blood pressure and splanchnic perfusion after cardiac surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixteen patients were studied after coronary artery bypass grafting. After admission to the intensive care unit, a 30-minute baseline measurement of systemic hemodynamics, oxygen transport, and gastric tonometry was performed. In 6 of 10 patients receiving enalaprilat and in each of 6 control patients, regional (splanchnic and leg) blood flows were measured also. After the baseline measurement period, 10 patients received a 0.5 mg bolus of enalaprilat and thereafter an incremental infusion of enalaprilat up to a total dose of 10 mg (mean 8.3; range 4 to 10 mg) was continued to reduce the mean arterial pressure (MAP) to 70 to 80 mm Hg. A 30-minute measurement period was repeated 2 to 3 hours after the first measurement period. In the control group, the second measurement was performed at corresponding time points.

RESULTS

Though MAP decreased in the enalaprilat group (enalaprilat 99 +/- 14 mm Hg v 89 +/- 21 mm Hg, P < .05; control 95 +/- 13 mm Hg v82 +/- 10 mm Hg, P = NS) in only 4 of 10 patients was the targeted MAP reduction achieved. No significant changes were observed either in systemic or regional blood flows. Systemic, pulmonary, and femoral vascular resistance indices decreased significantly in both groups. Gastric-arterial PCO2 difference did not change in either groups. Angiotensin-converting enzyme activity decreased in the enalaprilat group (10.0 +/- 2.3 v 1.3 +/- 0.3 U x l(-1), P < .01), but plasma renin and endothelin-1 concentrations did not change in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

The effect of enalaprilat on blood pressure was poor and it had no beneficial effects on splanchnic circulation. Renin-angiotensin activation is not a major factor in hypertension and splanchnic perfusion after cardiac surgery.

Impact of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system on blood pressure response to intravenous enalaprilat in patients with hypertensive crises

The purpose of the study was to evalute the impact of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone (RAA) system on blood pressure (BP) response in patients with hypertensive emergencies and urgencies treated with intravenous enalaprilat. Thirty-five patients with a systolic BP (SBP) >210 mm Hg and/or diastolic BP (DBP) >110 mm Hg received 5 mg enalaprilat intravenously. The extent of systolic and DBP reduction was correlated with pretreatment concentrations of angiotensin II (ANGII) (SBP: r = -0.47; P = 0.006; DBP: r = -0.55; P = 0.001) and plasma renin activity (PRA) (SBP: r = -0.49; P = 0.003; DBP: r = 0.48; P = 0.007). Non-responders to enalaprilat exhibited significant lower pretreatment levels of PRA, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) and ANG II compared to responders (PRA: 5.5 +/- 3.7 vs 1.1 +/- 2.2 ng/ml/h, P < 0.001; ACE: 12.8 +/- 3.5 vs 8.2 +/- 4.8 U/l, P = 0.003; ANG 11:8.7 +/- 6.2 vs 5.0 +/- 3.8 pg/ml, P = 0.04). In patients with severe hypotension following application of enalaprilat ANG II concentrations were significantly higher compared to patients with mean arterial BP reduction <25% (12.3 +/- 6.7 vs 5.6 +/- 4.0 pg/ml,P = 0.013). These data indicate that PRA and ANG II are the major determinants for BP response to enalaprilat. This relation between BP response and RAA system activity have important clinical implications for the treatment of patients with severe hypertension. Primary therapeutic failure indicates that the RAA system contributes very little to the hypertensive status of the patient. Thus, repetitive application on an ACE inhibitor in primary responders is clinically unhelpful and may result in an unnecessary delay of an effective BP reduction. In contrast, high ANG II concentrations are associated with a considerable risk for severe hypotension after enolanalaprilat application. Therefore, the status of the RAA system determines the efficacy as well as the safety of ACE inhibitor treatment in patients with severe hypertension.

Placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind study of intravenous enalaprilat efficacy and safety in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema

BACKGROUND

Converting enzyme inhibitors meet most of the criteria required to be used in acute pulmonary edema. However, they could also induce deleterious effects on renal function and electrolytes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a single intravenous 2-hour infusion of enalaprilat (1 mg) after an acute pulmonary edema.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This was a placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind study performed in 20 congestive heart failure patients (New York Heart Association class III or IV). Systemic and regional hemodynamic parameters, biological parameters, and blood gases were measured before and repeatedly after the onset of infusion. Compared with placebo, enalaprilat decreased pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (-37% versus -10%, P = .001), diastolic and mean systemic blood pressures (-21% versus 0%, P = .009, and -18% versus -1%, P = .026, respectively), diastolic and mean pulmonary blood pressures (-21% versus -8%, P = .040; -18% versus -9%, P = .046), and brachial and renal resistances (-44% versus -14%, P = .017, and -22% versus -2%, P = .014, respectively); increased brachial and renal blood flows (+77% versus +8%, P = .036, and +12% versus 0%, P = .043, respectively), arterial oxygen tension (+2% versus -16%, P = .041), and arterial oxygen saturation (+1% versus -2%, P = .045); and tended to decrease rate-pressure product (-19% versus -7%, P = .076), increase brachial artery diameter (+13% versus 0%, P = .081), and improve intrapulmonary shunt (-18% versus +16%, P = .080). Enalaprilat did not affect cardiac output or carotid or hepatosplanchnic hemodynamics.

CONCLUSIONS

Early administration of enalaprilat is effective and well tolerated in acute pulmonary edema.

Efficacy of different antihypertensive drugs in the emergency department

Hypertensive crises are a commonly observed problem in an emergency department. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different antihypertensive agents in the treatment of patients with hypertensive crises. 168 patients (mean age: 52 +/- 12 years) admitted to the emergency department with a hypertensive urgency (systolic (SBP) blood pressure > 210 mm Hg and/or diastolic (DBP) blood pressure > 110 mm Hg) or a hypertensive emergency (DBP > 100 mm Hg and evidence of end-organ damage) were included into the study protocol. Blood pressure (BP) was measured every 5 min automatically using a noninvasive BP measurement unit. After a resting period of 30 min the patients received the following drugs: 5 mg enalaprilat intravenous (n = 43) or 25 mg urapidil intravenous (n = 48) or 10 mg nifedipine-capsule sublingual (n = 47) or 2 x 5 mg nifedipine-spray sublingual (n = 30). The aim of treatment was to reduce SBP below 180 mm Hg and DBP below 95 mm Hg within 45 min after start of treatment. When evaluating the response rates the highest rate was observed in the urapidil group (96%). The response rate of enalaprilat and both preparations of nifedipine were similar (70-72%). The rate of major side effects was higher in the urapidil compared to the other drugs (4% vs 2% in the nifedipine-group or 0% in the enalaprilat-group). All four drugs are suitable in the treatment of patients with hypertensive crisis in the emergency department. Urapidil should be used as a first choice drug in critically ill patients with hypertensive crisis due to its higher response rate.

Mechanism of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor-related anemia in renal transplant recipients

To delineate the pathogenesis of the reduction in hemoglobin occurring in renal transplant patients treated with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and azathioprine (AZA) a controlled, prospective trial of ACEI withdrawal was conducted. The ACEI was replaced by nifedipine or clonidine in 15 kidney transplant patients immunosuppressed with AZA and prednisone (enalapril in 14 and captopril in 1). Before and during 10 to 12 weeks after withdrawal of the ACEI, AZA metabolites, renal function parameters and hematological parameters including erythropoietin and reticulocytes were evaluated. Enalaprilat levels were measured and compared with 15 similar patients matched for transplant function and enalapril dosage immunosuppressed with cyclosporine and prednisone. AZA metabolites did not differ significantly in the presence or absence of the ACEI. Enalaprilat levels also showed no significant difference between the two patient groups treated with AZA or cyclosporine. Hematocrit and hemoglobin increased significantly from 37.5 +/- 6.4 to 39.7 +/- 3.6% (mean +/- SD, P = 0.02) and 12.8 +/- 2.2 to 13.5 +/- 1.2 g/dl, P = 0.04, respectively, 10 to 12 weeks after ACEI treatment had been discontinued. Simultaneously numbers of reticulocytes and erythropoietin concentrations rose significantly after 2, 4 and 10 weeks, with a peak at two weeks (from 14.1 +/- 3.8 to 20.6 +/- 8.0/1000, P < 0.05 and from 14.3 +/- 12.4 to 29.3 +/- 54.5 mU/ml, P < 0.05, respectively). In conclusion, ACEI-related anemia in renal transplant recipients seems to be due to the erythropoietin-lowering effect of this group of drugs. A pharmacokinetic interaction between AZA and enalapril is not likely since plasma enalaprilat levels were independent of the immunosuppressive regimen and AZA metabolite levels were unchanged in the presence and absence of the ACEI. Several mechanisms by which angiotensin converting enzyme blockade may cause a decrease in circulating erythropoietin are discussed.