Intratympanic Steroid Treatment of Bell's Palsy in Patients with Comorbid Disease: A Preliminary Report

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the efficacy of intratympanic steroid injection (ITSI)as initial treatment and therecovery speed for Bell's palsy (BP)inpatients with diabetes mellitus (DM)and/or hypertension (HT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In total,90 patients with comorbid diseases diagnosed with BP received either ITSI (study group, n=61) or systemic steroid treatment (SST) (control group, n=29).The facial nerve function was assessed using the House-Brackmann (HB) grading system for up to 6 months or until complete recovery from BP. To investigate a relationship with the complete recovery time from BP, hematologic and baseline characteristic parameters were analyzed.

RESULTS

The complete recovery rate of the ITSI and SST groups was 47.5% and 44.8% at the 1st month, 70.5% and 89.7% at the 3rd month, and 96.7% and 100% at the 6th month of the study, respectively. Lymphocyte and neutrophil values were significantly associated with the complete recovery time from BP. No major adverse events from ITSI itself were noticed during the procedure and during the follow-up of the treatment.

CONCLUSION

Both treatment types have no superiorities over each other in initial treatment for BP in patients with comorbid diseases. ITSI is effective and safe and may avoid the unwanted side effects associated with systemic steroids inthese patients.

Bilateral delayed endolymphatic hydrops evaluated by bilateral intratympanic injection of gadodiamide with 3T-MRI

The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of 3T MRI after intratympanic injection of gadodiamide for delayed endolymphatic hydrops (DEH), and assess the relationship between endolymphatic hydrops (ELH) and vestibular function in patients diagnosed with DEH and confirmed by 3T MRI. Nineteen patients clinically diagnosed with DEH (11 ipsilateral DEH, 8 contralateral DEH) participated in this study. Diluted gadodiamide was administered to the bilateral tympanic cavity by injection through the tympanic membrane. At 24 hours post-injection, the ELH was evaluated by MRI. Patient vestibular functions were evaluated by caloric testing and cVEMP. ELH was observed in all patients (19/19: positive rate 100%). The distribution patterns of ELH varied between the cochlear or vestibular region. Vestibular ELH was observed in the affected ear in all ipsilateral DEH patients. In the contralateral DEH patients, however, there were individual differences in the distribution patterns of ELH. Six patients (1 ipsilateral DEH, 5 contralateral DEH) had bilateral ELH. No obvious relationships were observed between ELH and vestibular function. ELH distribution was complicated, particularly in the contralateral DEH cases. It was difficult to identify the existence of ELH by vestibular functional testing alone; therefore, 3T MRI is thought to be useful for identifying the affected ear. A significant number of cases had “bilateral” DEH, particularly among the contralateral DEH cases, indicating that we should pay careful attention to this pathology when treating DEH.

Efficacy of oral vs. intratympanic corticosteroids in sudden sensorineural hearing loss

BACKGROUND

The current standard treatment for sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) comprises of tapered course of oral corticosteroids. Intratympanic steroids are introduced as another modality of treatment, but management of SSNHL continues to be debatable. The present study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of steroids given orally and by the intratympanic route.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized, open-labeled study was conducted involving 42 patients. These were randomly divided into two groups; group I patients received oral prednisone tapered over 14 days, and group II patients were treated with intratympanic methylprednisolone (40 mg/mL). One milliliter of the drug solution containing 40 mg of the drug (40 mg/mL) was injected into the middle ear cavity through the trans-tympanic route. The drug was injected twice a week for 2 weeks. The total duration of the study was 60 days, and hearing outcome was assessed on the basis of change in pure tone average.

RESULTS

An improvement of 18.24±8.72 dB was recorded in group I patients treated with oral prednisone in comparison to 14.68±12.88 dB improvement in group II. Statistically significant improvement in hearing was observed in both groups, but it was not significant when group I and group II were compared.

CONCLUSIONS

The post-treatment outcomes among patients who receive either oral prednisone or intratympanic methylprednisolone within 2 weeks of onset of symptoms were comparable. The outcomes were affected by degree of hearing loss and association of SSNHL with vertigo.

[Intratympanic injection therapy for therapy refractory acute hearing loss: A safe option for secondary treatment]

BACKGROUND

High-dose corticosteroids are currently recommended for idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) treatment. Intratympanic injections (ITI) are of growing importance, especially in cases of therapy resistance. The selection of patients for this procedure in SSNHL has not been adequately examined so far.

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 77 patients with ISSNHL after ineffective systemic pretreatment underwent intratympanic administration of dexamethasone and hyaluronic acid. Improvement after treatment was determined by pure tone audiometry for both ears before and of the treated ear after ITI.

RESULTS

In this study 34 female and 43 male patients with mean age of 57 years showed a pre-ITI hearing loss of 35 dB in the lower frequencies and 69 dB in the higher frequencies. The mean hearing gain was 10 dB and the response rate was 62%. Absolute hearing gain revealed significant improvements at 500 Hz, 1 kHz and 2 kHz. Under inclusion of contralateral thresholds there were hardly any differences up to 4 kHz. In a detailed analysis of responders moderate improvements could be observed even in higher frequencies. Overall, no relevant adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSION

Treatment of ISSNHL resistant to systemic regimens by ITI of steroids provides an option that offers additional prospects of auditory improvement for affected patients. The presented results indicate that these modalities are also valid for patients with pancochlear ISSNHL.