1
|
Ezard N, Dunlop A, Hall M, Ali R, McKetin R, Bruno R, Phung N, Carr A, White J, Clifford B, Liu Z, Shanahan M, Dolan K, Baker AL, Lintzeris N. LiMA: a study protocol for a randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled trial of lisdexamfetamine for the treatment of methamphetamine dependence. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e020723. [PMID: 30030312 PMCID: PMC6059315 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Methamphetamine dependence is a growing public health concern. There is currently no pharmacotherapy approved for methamphetamine dependence. Lisdexamfetamine (LDX) dimesylate, used in the treatment of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and binge eating disorder, has potential as an agonist therapy for methamphetamine dependence, and possible benefits of reduced risk of aberrant use due to its novel formulation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A double-blind randomised controlled trial will be used to evaluate the efficacy of LDX in reducing methamphetamine use. The target sample is 180 participants with methamphetamine dependence of ≥2 years, using ≥14 days out of the previous 28, who have previously attempted but not responded to treatment for methamphetamine use. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either a 15-week intervention consisting of induction (1 week of 150 mg LDX or placebo), maintenance (12 weeks of 250 mg LDX or placebo) and reduction (1 week of 150 mg LDX or placebo and 1 week of 50 mg LDX or placebo). All participants will be given access to four sessions of cognitive-behavioural therapy as treatment as usual and receive a 4-week follow-up appointment. The primary outcomes are efficacy (change from baseline in days of methamphetamine use by self-report for the last 28 days at week 13 and urinalyses confirmation of methamphetamine use) and safety (treatment-related adverse events). Secondary outcomes are total number of days of self-report methamphetamine use over the 12-week active treatment, longest period of abstinence during treatment period, percentage of achieving ≥21 days abstinence, craving, withdrawal, dependence, retention, bloodborne virus transmission risk behaviour, criminal behaviour, as well measures of abuse liability, physical and mental health, other substance use, cognitive performance, psychosocial functioning, treatment retention and satisfaction. Additionally, the study will assess the cost-effectiveness of LDX relative to the placebo control. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study has been approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia (HREC/16/SVH/222). Contact the corresponding author for the full trial protocol. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ACTRN12617000657325; Pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadine Ezard
- Alcohol and Drug Service, St Vincents Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- University of New South Wales, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Adrian Dunlop
- Drug and Alcohol Clinical Services, Hunter New England, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michelle Hall
- Drug and Alcohol Clinical Services, Hunter New England, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Robert Ali
- University of New South Wales, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | | | - Raimondo Bruno
- University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Nghi Phung
- Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Andrew Carr
- Alcohol and Drug Service, St Vincents Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- University of New South Wales, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jason White
- University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Brendan Clifford
- Alcohol and Drug Service, St Vincents Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Zhixin Liu
- University of New South Wales, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Marian Shanahan
- National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kate Dolan
- National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Amanda L Baker
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nicholas Lintzeris
- University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- South East Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zimovetz EA, Joseph A, Ayyagari R, Mauskopf JA. A cost-effectiveness analysis of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in the treatment of adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in the UK. Eur J Health Econ 2018; 19:21-35. [PMID: 28093662 PMCID: PMC5773633 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-016-0864-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2015] [Accepted: 12/08/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a chronic neurobehavioral disorder in children that may persist into adulthood. Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) is approved in many countries for ADHD treatment in children, adolescents, and adults. OBJECTIVES Estimate the cost-effectiveness of LDX as a first- or second-line treatment for adults with ADHD from the United Kingdom (UK) National Health Service (NHS) perspective compared with methylphenidate extended release (MPH-ER) and atomoxetine (ATX). METHODS A 1-year decision-analytic model was developed. Health outcomes included response, non-response and inability to tolerate. Efficacy data were obtained from a mixed-treatment comparison (MTC). Response was a score of 1 or 2 on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale. Tolerability was assessed by discontinuation rates due to adverse events. Utilities were identified via a systematic literature review. Health care resource use estimates were obtained via a survey of clinicians. Daily drug costs were estimated from mean doses reported in the trials used in the MTC. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSAs) were performed. RESULTS LDX dominated MPH-ER and ATX; reducing mean per-patient annual cost by £5 and £200, and increasing mean quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) by 0.005 and 0.009, respectively. In the PSA, the probability of cost-effectiveness for LDX vs. MPH-ER and ATX at a threshold of £20,000 per QALY was 61% and 80%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS From the perspective of the UK NHS, LDX is likely to provide a cost-effective treatment for adults with ADHD. This conclusion may be drawn with more certainty in comparison with ATX than with MPH-ER.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evelina A Zimovetz
- RTI Health Solutions, 2nd Floor, The Pavilion, Towers Business Park, Wilmslow Road, Didsbury, Manchester, M20 2LS, UK.
| | | | - Rajeev Ayyagari
- Analysis Group, Inc., 111 Huntington Ave, 10th Floor, Boston, MA, 02199, USA
| | - Josephine A Mauskopf
- RTI Health Solutions, 200 Park Offices Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA
| |
Collapse
|