[Human Resource Development in Pharmaceutical Sciences in the New Era of Life Science]

Almost 20 years have passed since the six-year pharmaceutical education started as the standard educational course for pharmacists. The six-year pharmaceutical education was originally proposed to nurture the pharmacists who can play important roles in advanced medical care as part of the medical team. Importantly, recent advances in life science are providing additional scientific advantages for the graduates from the six-year pharmaceutical education system. In the new era of life science, clinical training in the six-year education will be beneficial not only for the clinical pharmacists but also for the pharmaceutical scientists. For example, in drug discovery research, numerous studies have been making efforts to identify therapeutic targets based on basic sciences so far. However, as a result of the innovation in life science, such as multi-omics analyses and molecular imaging, we can now perform patient-/disease-oriented research on molecular basis using clinical materials and information. Nowadays, with the help of data science, we can understand the pathophysiological status of individual patients and optimize pharmacotherapy from viewpoint of molecular biology in clinical setting. Moreover, in drug discovery research, we can explore and identify the drug targets by analyzing clinical samples and medical records. Thus, learning from the bedside in detail will develop future leaders, including pharmacists, scientists and pharmacist-scientists, who will pave the way for pharmaceutical sciences in the next generation.

Evaluating a measure of the research training environment in a sample of pharmacy residents

INTRODUCTION

While an important predictor of future research involvement, formal assessment of the quality of the research training environment in pharmacy residency training has not been examined. The objective of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of a modified version of the shortened form of the revised Research Training Environment Scale (RTES-R-S) in pharmacy residents.

METHODS

The original wording of the 18 items from RTES-R-S was modified to reflect pharmacy residency training. Data were collected as part of a larger study involving a random sample of pharmacy residents in the United States during the 2016-2017 residency year. Internal consistency was assessed with Cronbach's α. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to assess the fit of the factor structures examined previously during the original RTES-R-S development.

RESULTS

Based on confirmatory factor analysis, the preferred model proposed a single, second-order factor predicting nine factors reflecting Gelso's previously described ingredients of the research training environment. This model had acceptable fit indices and was statistically better than models without second-order factors. Cronbach's α for the global scale was 0.86, with the two subscales >0.7.

CONCLUSIONS

Minor rewording of an existing instrument to measure residents' perceptions of the quality of the research training environment demonstrated acceptable internal consistency. The factor structure of the recommended use proposed by the original developers of the RTES-R-S was supported in this sample of pharmacy residents. Continued work with additional samples is needed to generate additional validity evidence supporting the use of this tool in pharmacy residents.

Implementation of a research capstone course with expanded flexibility

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

A research-focused capstone course was designed to improve flexibility in the way pharmacy students meet the university's capstone requirement. The requirement aims to integrate knowledge, skills, and attitudes from didactic coursework and to apply them in a scholarly way to improve critical and evidence-based thinking, communication skills, and professionalism. This report describes the capstone course and faculty and student perceptions after the first year of implementation.

EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY AND SETTING

The course allows students to work with a faculty advisor on a four-semester hour research project of mutual interest that can be completed in any one of three semesters. After the first student cohort completed their projects, faculty and student perceptions were captured via electronic survey.

FINDINGS

A total of 38 students (36%) and 22 advisors (71%) responded to the survey. Approximately 90% of students and faculty agreed that student groups had achieved course objectives upon completion. Although faculty members felt that participating in the capstone course increased their workload and in some cases reduced their productivity, faculty members felt that the course had a beneficial impact for students.

SUMMARY

The new capstone course was well received. The flexibility of the course was both a strength and a limitation as most students wanted more structure in the expectations and grading of the project in the form of a rubric or other standardized assessments.

Outcomes of Student-Driven, Faculty-Mentored Research and Impact on Postgraduate Training and Career Selection

Objective. To evaluate scholarly deliverables from student-driven research and explore the impact on postgraduate training placement rates, pharmacy faculty appointments and lifetime publications. Methods. A retrospective analysis of Doctor of Pharmacy graduates who conducted student research between the academic years of 2002 and 2015 was performed. Data were collected on research participation, abstracts, presentations, postgraduate training, full-time faculty appointments, and publications. Results. Of 1229 graduates, 300 participated in research during pharmacy school. Fifty-six percent (n=167) submitted at least one abstract and 68 students (23%) published their research. Research participation was associated with a significantly higher likelihood of postgraduate training and specialty training. Research participation positively affected the likelihood of faculty appointment and lifetime publication rate. Conclusion. Students who engaged in elective research had significant scholarly deliverables, including peer-reviewed publications, and were more likely to successfully match in a postgraduate position and achieve full-time academic appointments.

Competency, Programming, and Emerging Innovation in Graduate Education within Schools of Pharmacy: The Report of the 2016-2017 Research and Graduate Affairs Committee

Graduate education in the pharmaceutical sciences is a cornerstone of research within pharmacy schools. Pharmaceutical scientists are critical contributors to addressing the challenges of new drug discovery, delivery, and optimal care in order to ensure improved therapeutic outcomes in populations of patients. The American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP) charged the 2016-2017 Research and Graduate Affairs Committee (RGAC) to define the competencies necessary for graduate education in the pharmaceutical sciences (Charge 1), recommend collaborative curricular development across schools of pharmacy (Charge 2), recommend AACP programing for graduate education (Charge 3), and provide guidance on emerging areas for innovation in graduate education (Charge 4). With respect to Charges 1 and 2, the RGAC committee developed six domains of core competencies for graduate education in the pharmaceutical sciences as well as recommendations for shared programming. For Charge 3, the committee made 3 specific programming recommendations that include AACP sponsored regional research symposia, a professional development forum at the AACP INterim Meeting, and the addition of a graduate research and education poster session at the AACP Annual Meeting. For Charge 4, the committee recommended that AACP develop a standing committee of graduate program deans and directors to provide guidance to member schools in support of graduate program representation at AACP meetings, develop skills for interprofessional teamwork and augment research through integration of Pharm.D., Ph.D., postdoctoral associates, resident, and fellow experiences. Two proposed policy statements by the committee are that AACP believes core competencies are essential components of graduate education and AACP supports the inclusion of research and graduate education focuses in its portfolio of meetings and programs.

Fellowships in community pharmacy research: Experiences of five schools and colleges of pharmacy

OBJECTIVE

To describe common facilitators, challenges, and lessons learned in 5 schools and colleges of pharmacy in establishing community pharmacy research fellowships.

SETTING

Five schools and colleges of pharmacy in the United States.

PRACTICE DESCRIPTION

Schools and colleges of pharmacy with existing community partnerships identified a need and ability to develop opportunities for pharmacists to engage in advanced research training.

PRACTICE INNOVATION

Community pharmacy fellowships, each structured as 2 years long and in combination with graduate coursework, have been established at the University of Pittsburgh, Purdue University, East Tennessee State University, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and The Ohio State University.

EVALUATION

Program directors from each of the 5 community pharmacy research fellowships identified common themes pertaining to program structure, outcomes, and lessons learned to assist others planning similar programs.

RESULTS

Common characteristics across the programs include length of training, prerequisites, graduate coursework, mentoring structure, and immersion into a pharmacist patient care practice. Common facilitators have been the existence of strong community pharmacy partnerships, creating a fellowship advisory team, and networking. A common challenge has been recruitment, with many programs experiencing at least one year without filling the fellowship position. All program graduates (n = 4) have been successful in securing pharmacy faculty positions.

CONCLUSION

Five schools and colleges of pharmacy share similar experiences in implementing community pharmacy research fellowships. Early outcomes show promise for this training pathway in growing future pharmacist-scientists focused on community pharmacy practice.