1
|
Zeng C, Lu RH, Li X, Wang S, Kuai YR, Xue Q. Effect of frozen-thawed embryo transfer with a poor-quality embryo and a good-quality embryo on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2024; 22:26. [PMID: 38383391 PMCID: PMC10880350 DOI: 10.1186/s12958-024-01194-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate the impact of embryo quality and quantity, specifically a poor quality embryo (PQE) in combination with a good quality embryo (GQE), by double embryo transfer (DET) on the live birth rate (LBR) and neonatal outcomes in patients undergoing frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles. METHODS A study on a cohort of women who underwent a total of 1462 frozen-thawed cleavage or blastocyst embryo transfer cycles with autologous oocytes was conducted between January 2018 and December 2021. To compare the outcomes between single embryo transfer (SET) with a GQE and DET with a GQE and a PQE, propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to control for potential confounders, and a generalized estimating equation (GEE) model was used to determine the association between the effect of an additional PQE and the outcomes. Subgroup analysis was also performed for patients stratified by female age. RESULTS After PS matching, DET-GQE + PQE did not significantly alter the LBR (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.421, 95% CI 0.907-2.228) compared with SET-GQE in cleavage-stage embryo transfer but did increase the multiple birth rate (MBR, [OR] 3.917, 95% CI 1.189-12.911). However, in patients who underwent blastocyst-stage embryo transfer, adding a second PQE increased the live birth rate by 7.8% ([OR] 1.477, 95% CI 1.046-2.086) and the multiple birth rate by 19.6% ([OR] 28.355, 95% CI 3.926-204.790), and resulted in adverse neonatal outcomes. For patients who underwent cleavage-stage embryo transfer, transferring a PQE with a GQE led to a significant increase in the MBR ([OR] 4.724, 95% CI 1.121-19.913) in women under 35 years old but not in the LBR ([OR] 1.227, 95% CI 0.719-2.092). The increases in LBR and MBR for DET-GQE + PQE compared with SET-GQE in women older than 35 years were nonsignificant toward. For patients who underwent blastocyst-stage embryo transfer, DET-GQE + PQE had a greater LBR ([OR] 1.803, 95% CI 1.165-2.789), MBR ([OR] 24.185, 95% CI 3.285-178.062) and preterm birth rate (PBR, [OR] 4.092, 95% CI 1.153-14.518) than did SET-GQE in women under 35 years old, while no significant impact on the LBR ([OR] 1.053, 95% CI 0.589-1.884) or MBR (0% vs. 8.3%) was observed in women older than 35 years. CONCLUSIONS The addition of a PQE has no significant benefit on the LBR but significantly increases the MBR in patients who underwent frozen-thawed cleavage-stage embryo transfer. However, for patients who underwent blastocyst-stage embryo transfer, DET-GQE + PQE resulted in an increase in both the LBR and MBR, which may lead to adverse neonatal outcomes. Thus, the benefits and risks of double blastocyst-stage embryo transfer should be balanced. In patients younger than 35 years, SET-GQE achieved satisfactory LBR either in cleavage-stage embryo transfer or blastocyst-stage embryo transfer, while DET-GQE + PQE resulted in a dramatically increased MBR. Considering the low LBR in women older than 35 years who underwent single cleavage-stage embryo transfer, selective single blastocyst-stage embryo transfer appears to be a more promising approach for reducing the risk of multiple live births and adverse neonatal outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheng Zeng
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, 100034, P. R. China
| | - Rui-Hui Lu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, 100034, P. R. China
| | - Xin Li
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, 100034, P. R. China
| | - Sheng Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, 100034, P. R. China
| | - Yan-Rong Kuai
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, 100034, P. R. China
| | - Qing Xue
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, 100034, P. R. China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cohen K, Licciardi F. The timing of saline sonograms in respect to pregnancy outcomes of single euploid embryo transfers. Fertil Steril 2023; 120:1074-1075. [PMID: 37573999 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.08.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Revised: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Koral Cohen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York City, New York.
| | - Frederick Licciardi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York City, New York; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, New York University Langone Fertility Center, New York City, New York
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ma S, Peng Y, Hu L, Wang X, Xiong Y, Tang Y, Tan J, Gong F. Comparisons of benefits and risks of single embryo transfer versus double embryo transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2022; 20:20. [PMID: 35086551 PMCID: PMC8793185 DOI: 10.1186/s12958-022-00899-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence referring to the trade-offs between the benefits and risks of single embryo transfer (SET) versus double embryo transfer (DET) following assisted reproduction technology are insufficient, especially for those women with a defined embryo quality or advanced age. METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched based on established search strategy from inception through February 2021. Pre-specified primary outcomes were live birth rate (LBR) and multiple pregnancy rate (MPR). Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were pooled by a random-effects model using R version 4.1.0. RESULTS Eighty-five studies (14 randomized controlled trials and 71 observational studies) were eligible. Compared with DET, SET decreased the probability of a live birth (OR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.71-0.85, P < 0.001, n = 62), and lowered the rate of multiple pregnancy (0.05, 0.04-0.06, P < 0.001, n = 45). In the sub-analyses of age stratification, both the differences of LBR (0.87, 0.54-1.40, P = 0.565, n = 4) and MPR (0.34, 0.06-2.03, P = 0.236, n = 3) between SET and DET groups became insignificant in patients aged ≥40 years. No significant difference in LBR for single GQE versus two embryos of mixed quality [GQE + PQE (non-good quality embryo)] (0.99, 0.77-1.27, P = 0.915, n = 8), nor any difference of MPR in single PQE versus two PQEs (0.23, 0.04-1.49, P = 0.123, n = 6). Moreover, women who conceived through SET were associated with lower risks of poor outcomes, including cesarean section (0.64, 0.43-0.94), antepartum haemorrhage (0.35, 0.15-0.82), preterm birth (0.25, 0.21-0.30), low birth weight (0.20, 0.16-0.25), Apgar1 < 7 rate (0.12, 0.02-0.93) or neonatal intensive care unit admission (0.30, 0.14-0.66) than those following DET. CONCLUSIONS In women aged < 40 years or if any GQE is available, SET should be incorporated into clinical practice. While in the absence of GQEs, DET may be preferable. However, for elderly women aged ≥40 years, current evidence is not enough to recommend an appropriate number of embryo transfer. The findings need to be further confirmed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shujuan Ma
- Clinical Research Center for Reproduction and Genetics in Hunan Province, Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya, No. 567, Tongzipo West Road, Yuelu District, Changsha, 410205, China
| | - Yangqin Peng
- Clinical Research Center for Reproduction and Genetics in Hunan Province, Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya, No. 567, Tongzipo West Road, Yuelu District, Changsha, 410205, China
| | - Liang Hu
- Clinical Research Center for Reproduction and Genetics in Hunan Province, Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya, No. 567, Tongzipo West Road, Yuelu District, Changsha, 410205, China
| | - Xiaojuan Wang
- Clinical Research Center for Reproduction and Genetics in Hunan Province, Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya, No. 567, Tongzipo West Road, Yuelu District, Changsha, 410205, China
| | - Yiquan Xiong
- Chinese Evidence-based Medicine Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guoxue Lane, Wuhou District, Chengdu, 610041, China
| | - Yi Tang
- Clinical Research Center for Reproduction and Genetics in Hunan Province, Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya, No. 567, Tongzipo West Road, Yuelu District, Changsha, 410205, China
| | - Jing Tan
- Chinese Evidence-based Medicine Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guoxue Lane, Wuhou District, Chengdu, 610041, China.
| | - Fei Gong
- Clinical Research Center for Reproduction and Genetics in Hunan Province, Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya, No. 567, Tongzipo West Road, Yuelu District, Changsha, 410205, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jwa SC, Seto S, Takamura M, Kuwahara A, Kajihara T, Ishihara O. Ovarian stimulation increases the risk of ectopic pregnancy for fresh embryo transfers: an analysis of 68,851 clinical pregnancies from the Japanese Assisted Reproductive Technology registry. Fertil Steril 2020; 114:1198-1206. [PMID: 33081977 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.06.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2019] [Revised: 06/18/2020] [Accepted: 06/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the risk of ectopic pregnancies (EPs) for fresh cycles according to different ovarian stimulation protocols. DESIGN Registry-based retrospective cohort study. SETTING Not applicable. PATIENT(S) A total of 68,851 clinical pregnancies after fresh single embryo transfer between 2007 and 2015. INTERVENTION (S) None MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Ectopic pregnancies. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for EPs were calculated by using generalized estimating equations adjusted for potential maternal and treatment characteristics. RESULT(S) Among 68,851 clinical pregnancies, 1,049 (1.46%) cases of EP were reported. Compared with natural cycles, all ovarian stimulation protocols were associated with a significantly increased risk of EP. Ovarian stimulation with clomiphene (CC) demonstrated the highest odds ratios for EPs. Significant associations between ovarian stimulation protocols and EP compared with natural cycles were prominent when the number of retrieved oocytes was low (1-3) to moderate (4-7), but there were no significant associations when the number of retrieved oocytes was high (≥8). CONCLUSION(S) Ovarian stimulation protocols were significantly associated with an increased risk of EP. In particular, ovarian stimulation with CC had the highest risk of EP compared with other stimulation protocols. Further studies are essential to investigate possible confounding factors for different ovarian stimulation protocols, especially CC, and the risk of EP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seung Chik Jwa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan.
| | - Sachie Seto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | - Masashi Takamura
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | - Akira Kuwahara
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Takeshi Kajihara
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | - Osamu Ishihara
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
The number of embryos transferred during an IVF cycle is directly related to the high incidence of multiple births, which is the culprit of perinatal morbidity. Therefore, single fresh embryo transfer (ET) strategy, or freeze-all, followed by a single frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycle, may dramatically reduce the rate of multiple births, without compromising the cumulative live birth rates (LBRs). A literature review was conducted for all available evidences assessing obstetrics and perinatal outcomes associated with FET compared to fresh ET and natural conception. While studies comparing fresh and FET cycles in normal responders have yielded conflicting results for pregnancy rate, FET was associated with lower risk of prematurity and low birth weight and increased risk of large for gestational age (LGA) and/or macrosomic in singletons, when compared with fresh ET. Macrosomic/LGA births have a higher risk of fetal hypoxia, stillbirth, shoulder dystocia, perineal lacerations, cesarean section, postpartum hemorrhage and neonatal metabolic disturbances at birth. Nonetheless, it seems that other than higher risk of fetal macrosomia, there are additional obstetric complications associated with FET. The relative risk of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, as well as perinatal mortality were also demonstrated to be increased in FET compared with singletons from fresh ET and natural conception. Therefore, when considering elective freeze-all policy, in addition to LBR and the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, physicians should consider the aforementioned increased FET cycles' pregnancy complications, including LGA/ macrosomia, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, as well as perinatal mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raoul Orvieto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
- The Tarnesby-Tarnowski Chair for Family Planning and Fertility Regulation, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- *Correspondence: Raoul Orvieto
| | - Michal Kirshenbaum
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Norbert Gleicher
- The Center for Human Reproduction, New York, NY, United States
- The Foundation for Reproductive Medicine, New York, NY, United States
- Stem Cell Biology and Molecular Embryology Laboratory, Rockefeller University, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wei D, Liu JY, Sun Y, Shi Y, Zhang B, Liu JQ, Tan J, Liang X, Cao Y, Wang Z, Qin Y, Zhao H, Zhou Y, Ren H, Hao G, Ling X, Zhao J, Zhang Y, Qi X, Zhang L, Deng X, Chen X, Zhu Y, Wang X, Tian LF, Lv Q, Ma X, Zhang H, Legro RS, Chen ZJ. Frozen versus fresh single blastocyst transfer in ovulatory women: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2019; 393:1310-1318. [PMID: 30827784 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32843-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 269] [Impact Index Per Article: 53.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2018] [Revised: 10/29/2018] [Accepted: 11/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Elective single embryo transfer (eSET) has been increasingly advocated, but concerns about the lower pregnancy rate after reducing the number of embryos transferred have encouraged transfer of multiple embryos. Extended embryo culture combined with electively freezing all embryos and undertaking a deferred frozen embryo transfer might increase pregnancy rate after eSET. We aimed to establish whether elective frozen single blastocyst transfer improved singleton livebirth rate compared with fresh single blastocyst transfer. METHODS This multicentre, non-blinded, randomised controlled trial was undertaken in 21 academic fertility centres in China. 1650 women with regular menstrual cycles undergoing their first cycle of in-vitro fertilisation were enrolled from Aug 1, 2016, to June 3, 2017. Eligible women were randomly assigned to either fresh or frozen single blastocyst transfer. The randomisation sequence was computer generated, with block sizes of two, four, or six, stratified by study site. For those assigned to frozen blastocyst transfer, all blastocysts were cryopreserved and a delayed frozen-thawed single blastocyst transfer was done. The primary outcome was singleton livebirth rate. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, number ChiCTR-IOR-14005405. FINDINGS 825 women were assigned to each group and included in analyses. Frozen single blastocyst transfer resulted in higher rates of singleton livebirth than did fresh single blastocyst transfer (416 [50%] vs 329 [40%]; relative risk [RR] 1·26, 95% CI 1·14-1·41, p<0·0001). The risks of moderate or severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (four of 825 [0·5%] in frozen single blastocyst transfer vs nine of 825 [1·1%] in fresh single blastocyst transfer; p=0·16), pregnancy loss (134 of 583 [23·0%] vs 124 of 481 [25·8%]; p=0·29), other obstetric complications, and neonatal morbidity were similar between the two groups. Frozen single blastocyst transfer was associated with a higher risk of pre-eclampsia (16 of 512 [3·1%] vs four of 401 [1·0%]; RR 3·13, 95% CI 1·06-9·30, p=0·029). INTERPRETATION Frozen single blastocyst transfer resulted in a higher singleton livebirth rate than did fresh single blastocyst transfer in ovulatory women with good prognosis. The increased risk of pre-eclampsia after frozen blastocyst transfer warrants further studies. FUNDING The National Key Research and Development Program of China.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daimin Wei
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China; The Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Jinan, China; National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Jinan, China
| | - Jia-Yin Liu
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University/Jiangsu Province Hospital, Nanjing, China; State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Nanjing, China
| | - Yun Sun
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai, China; School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction and Reproductive Genetics, Shanghai, China
| | - Yuhua Shi
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China; The Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Jinan, China; National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Jinan, China
| | - Bo Zhang
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Maternal and Child Health Hospital in Guangxi, Guangxi, China
| | - Jian-Qiao Liu
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Key Laboratory for Major Obstetric Diseases of Guangdong Province, and Key Laboratory for Reproduction and Genetics of Guangdong Higher Education Institutes, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jichun Tan
- Reproductive Medicine Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Xiaoyan Liang
- Reproductive Medicine Research Centre, the 6th Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yunxia Cao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
| | - Ze Wang
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China; The Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Jinan, China; National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Jinan, China
| | - Yingying Qin
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China; The Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Jinan, China; National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Jinan, China
| | - Han Zhao
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China; The Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Jinan, China; National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Jinan, China
| | - Yi Zhou
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Qingdao Women's and Children's Hospital, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Haiqin Ren
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Shenyang Dongfang Jinghua Hospital, Shenyang, China
| | - Guimin Hao
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Xiufeng Ling
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, the affiliated Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Nanjing, China
| | - Junzhao Zhao
- Reproductive Medical Center, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College and Yuying Children's hospital, Wenzhou, China
| | - Yunshan Zhang
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Tianjin Central Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tianjin, China
| | - Xiujuan Qi
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Lin Zhang
- Department of Occupational Hygiene, School of Public Health and Management, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, China
| | - Xiaohui Deng
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Xiaoli Chen
- Division of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yimin Zhu
- Department of Reproductive Endocrinology, Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xiaohong Wang
- Reproductive Medical Center, Tangdu Hospital, the Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China
| | - Li-Feng Tian
- Reproductive Medical Center, Jiangxi Provincial Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Nanchang, China
| | - Qun Lv
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Chengdu, China
| | - Xiang Ma
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University/Jiangsu Province Hospital, Nanjing, China; State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Nanjing, China
| | - Heping Zhang
- Department of Biostatistics, Yale University School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Richard S Legro
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Zi-Jiang Chen
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China; The Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology of Ministry of Education, Jinan, China; National Research Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Genetics, Jinan, China; Center for Reproductive Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai, China; School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction and Reproductive Genetics, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kwek LK, Saffari SE, Tan HH, Chan JK, Nada S. Comparison between Single and Double Cleavage-Stage Embryo Transfers, Single and Double Blastocyst Transfers in a South East Asian In Vitro Fertilisation Centre. Ann Acad Med Singap 2018; 47:451-454. [PMID: 30578424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study investigated the differences in clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), live birth rate (LBR) and multiple pregnancy rate (MPR) between double cleavage-stage embryo transfers compared to single and double blastocysts stage embryo transfers in a single academic medical centre. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study performed at the KK Women's and Children's Hospital In Vitro Fertilisation (KKIVF) Centre of all women who underwent fresh-cycle in vitro fertilisation/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles over a 5-year period. The outcome measures were CPR, LBR and MPR. The study included 5294 cycles, of which 539 patients underwent single embryo transfer (SET); 4533 patients underwent double embryo transfer (DET); 84 patients underwent double blastocyst embryo transfer (DBT); and 65 patients underwent single blastocyst embryo transfer (SBT). RESULTS The mean age of patients undergoing single blastocysts stage embryo transfer was lower than the other 2 groups. The DET, single and double blastocysts stage embryo transfer groups achieved similar LBR (33.9%, 38.7%, 35.4%, P >0.05) and CPR (42.4%, 46.2%, 46.9%). CONCLUSION We found that single blastocysts stage embryo transfer is associated with similar LBR and CPR compared to double blastocysts stage embryo transfer and DET, with lower MPRs, and should be offered as standard practice, where possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lee Koon Kwek
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yoder N, Tal R, Martin JR. Abdominal ectopic pregnancy after in vitro fertilization and single embryo transfer: a case report and systematic review. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2016; 14:69. [PMID: 27760569 PMCID: PMC5070159 DOI: 10.1186/s12958-016-0201-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2016] [Accepted: 10/06/2016] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ectopic pregnancy is the leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality during the first trimester and the incidence increases dramatically with assisted-reproductive technology (ART), occurring in approximately 1.5-2.1 % of patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF). Abdominal ectopic pregnancy is a rare yet clinically significant form of ectopic pregnancy due to potentially high maternal morbidity. While risk factors for ectopic pregnancy after IVF have been studied, very little is known about risk factors specific for abdominal ectopic pregnancy. We present a case of a 30 year-old woman who had an abdominal ectopic pregnancy following IVF and elective single embryo transfer, which was diagnosed and managed by laparoscopy. We performed a systematic literature search to identify case reports of abdominal or heterotopic abdominal ectopic pregnancies after IVF. A total of 28 cases were identified. RESULTS Patients' ages ranged from 23 to 38 (Mean 33.2, S.D. = 3.2). Infertility causes included tubal factor (46 %), endometriosis (14 %), male factor (14 %), pelvic adhesive disease (7 %), structural/DES exposure (7 %), and unexplained infertility (14 %). A history of ectopic pregnancy was identified in 39 % of cases. A history of tubal surgery was identified in 50 % of cases, 32 % cases having had bilateral salpingectomy. Transfer of two embryos or more (79 %) and fresh embryo transfer (71 %) were reported in the majority of cases. Heterotopic abdominal pregnancy occurred in 46 % of cases while 54 % were abdominal ectopic pregnancies. CONCLUSIONS Our systematic review has revealed several trends in reported cases of abdominal ectopic pregnancy after IVF including tubal factor infertility, history of tubal ectopic and tubal surgery, higher number of embryos transferred, and fresh embryo transfers. These are consistent with known risk factors for ectopic pregnancy following IVF. Further research focusing on more homogenous population may help in better characterizing this rare IVF complication and its risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Yoder
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology & Infertility, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, & Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
| | - Reshef Tal
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology & Infertility, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, & Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
| | - J. Ryan Martin
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology & Infertility, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, & Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mancuso AC, Boulet SL, Duran E, Munch E, Kissin DM, Van Voorhis BJ. Elective single embryo transfer in women less than age 38 years reduces multiple birth rates, but not live birth rates, in United States fertility clinics. Fertil Steril 2016; 106:1107-1114. [PMID: 27376458 PMCID: PMC11056967 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.06.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2016] [Revised: 05/06/2016] [Accepted: 06/07/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the effect of elective single ET (eSET) on live birth and multiple birth rates by a cycle-level and clinic-level analysis. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING Not applicable. PATIENT(S) Patient ages <35 and 35-37 years old. INTERVENTION(S) None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Clinics were divided into groups based on eSET rate for each age group and aggregate rates of live birth per ET and multiple birth per delivery were calculated. A cycle-level analysis comparing eSET and double ET (DET) live birth and multiple birth rates was also performed, stratified based on total number (2, 3, or 4+) of embryos available, embryo stage, and patient age. RESULT(S) There was a linear decrease in multiple birth rate with increasing eSET rate and no significant difference in clinic-level live birth rates for each age group. Cycle-level analysis found slightly higher live birth rates with double ET, but this was mainly observed in women aged 35-37 years or with four or more embryos available for transfer, and confirmed the marked reduction in multiple births with eSET. CONCLUSION(S) Our study showed a marked and linear reduction in multiple birth rates, and important, little to no effect on clinic-level live birth rates with increasing rates of eSET supporting the growing evidence that eSET is effective in decreasing the high multiple birth rates associated with IVF and suggests that eSET should be used more frequently than is currently practiced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abigail C Mancuso
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa.
| | - Sheree L Boulet
- Division of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Eyup Duran
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Erika Munch
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Dmitry M Kissin
- Division of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Bradley J Van Voorhis
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gleicher N, Kushnir VA, Barad DH. Risks of spontaneously and IVF-conceived singleton and twin pregnancies differ, requiring reassessment of statistical premises favoring elective single embryo transfer (eSET). Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2016; 14:25. [PMID: 27142226 PMCID: PMC4855800 DOI: 10.1186/s12958-016-0160-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2016] [Accepted: 04/25/2016] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
A published review of the literature by Dutch investigators in 2004 suggested significant outcome differences between spontaneously - and in vitro fertilization (IVF) - conceived singleton and twin pregnancies. Here we review whether later studies between 2004-2015 confirmed these findings. Though methodologies of here reviewed studies varied, and all were retrospective, they overall confirmed results of the 2004 review, and supported significant outcome variances between spontaneously- and IVF-conceived pregnancies: IVF singletons demonstrate significantly poorer and IVF twins significantly better perinatal outcomes than spontaneously conceived singletons and twins, with differences stable over time, and with overall obstetrical outcomes significantly improved. Exaggerations of severe IVF twin risks are likely in the 50 % range, while exaggerations of milder perinatal risks are approximately in 25 % range. Though elective single embryo transfers (eSET) have been confirmed to reduce pregnancy chances, they are, nevertheless, increasingly utilized. eSET, equally unquestionably, however, reduces twin pregnancies. Because twin pregnancies have been alleged to increase outcome risks in comparison to singleton pregnancies, here reported findings should affect the ongoing discussion whether increased twin risks are factual. With no risk excess, eSET significantly reduces IVF pregnancy chances without compensatory benefits and, therefore, is not advisable in IVF, unless patients do not wish to conceive twins or have medical contraindications to conceiving twins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norbert Gleicher
- The Center for Human Reproduction, 21 East 69th Street, 10021, New York, N.Y., USA.
- The Foundation for Reproductive Medicine, New York, N.Y., USA.
- The Rockefeller University, New York, N.Y., USA.
| | - Vitally A Kushnir
- The Center for Human Reproduction, 21 East 69th Street, 10021, New York, N.Y., USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wayne Forrest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, N.C., USA
| | - David H Barad
- The Center for Human Reproduction, 21 East 69th Street, 10021, New York, N.Y., USA
- The Foundation for Reproductive Medicine, New York, N.Y., USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, N.Y., USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Styer AK, Luke B, Vitek W, Christianson MS, Baker VL, Christy AY, Polotsky AJ. Factors associated with the use of elective single-embryo transfer and pregnancy outcomes in the United States, 2004-2012. Fertil Steril 2016; 106:80-89. [PMID: 26997248 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.02.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2015] [Revised: 02/09/2016] [Accepted: 02/25/2016] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate factors associated with elective single-embryo transfer (eSET) utilization and its effect on assisted reproductive technology outcomes in the United States. DESIGN Historical cohort. SETTING Not applicable. PATIENT(S) Fresh IVF cycles of women aged 18-37 years using autologous oocytes with either one (SET) or two (double-embryo transfer [DET]) embryos transferred and reported to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System between 2004 and 2012. Cycles were categorized into four groups with ([+]) or without ([-]) supernumerary embryos cryopreserved. The SET group with embryos cryopreserved was designated as eSET. INTERVENTION(S) None. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURE(S) The likelihood of eSET utilization, live birth, and singleton non-low birth weight term live birth, modeled using logistic regression. Presented as adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULT(S) The study included 263,375 cycles (21,917 SET[-]cryopreservation, 20,996 SET[+]cryopreservation, 103,371 DET[-]cryopreservation, and 117,091 DET[+]cryopreservation). The utilization of eSET (SET[+]cryopreservation) increased from 1.8% in 2004 to 14.9% in 2012 (aOR 7.66, 95% CI 6.87-8.53) and was more likely with assisted reproductive technology insurance coverage (aOR 1.60, 95% CI 1.54-1.66), Asian race (aOR 1.26, 95% CI 1.20-1.33), uterine factor diagnosis (aOR 1.48, 95% CI 1.37-1.59), retrieval of ≥16 oocytes (aOR 2.85, 95% CI 2.55-3.19), and the transfer of day 5-6 embryos (aOR 4.23, 95% CI 4.06-4.40); eSET was less likely in women aged 35-37 years (aOR 0.76, 95% CI 0.73-0.80). Compared with DET cycles, the likelihood of the ideal outcome, term non-low birth weight singleton live birth, was increased 45%-52% with eSET. CONCLUSION(S) Expanding insurance coverage for IVF would facilitate the broader use of eSET and may reduce the morbidity and healthcare costs associated with multiple pregnancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron K Styer
- Vincent Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | - Barbara Luke
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, East Lansing, Michigan
| | - Wendy Vitek
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, New York
| | - Mindy S Christianson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Valerie L Baker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Alicia Y Christy
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Alex J Polotsky
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Balassiano E, Malik S, Vaid P, Knochenhauer ES, Traub ML. The presence of multiple gestational sacs confers a higher live birth rate in women with infertility who achieve a positive pregnancy test after fresh and frozen embryo transfer: a retrospective local cohort. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2014; 12:104. [PMID: 25422171 PMCID: PMC4247647 DOI: 10.1186/1477-7827-12-104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2014] [Accepted: 07/26/2014] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND After spontaneous conception, the rate of miscarriage is more common in multiple rather than singleton pregnancies. However, the incidence of miscarriage is lower in in-vitro fertilization twin versus singleton pregnancies. Most patients have little understanding of pregnancy outcomes once they achieve a positive pregnancy test. This study investigated the relationship between multiple pregnancy and miscarriage in women with infertility after fresh and frozen embryo transfer. METHODS Retrospective local cohort study of all consecutive patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization at our institution (n = 1130), fresh or frozen embryo transfer, between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2012. Patient characteristics (age, body mass index, initial hCG, maximum follicle stimulating hormone levels) and in-vitro fertilization parameters (estradiol levels, eggs retrieved, and endometrial thickness) were collected and statistically analyzed using T-test and Chi-square test (Stata version 10). Linear and logistic regression were used when appropriate. RESULTS Overall, live birth rate for all cycles was 30.44% and total pregnancy loss was 6.55% - similar for fresh and frozen cycles despite a higher rate of biochemical pregnancies for frozen cycles. Among all pregnant patients, 62.48% had a live birth. Although clinical pregnancy rate was higher for fresh cycles, live birth rates were similar. In pregnancies where multiple sacs were demonstrated on ultrasound, live birth rates were higher despite 31% of patients losing at least one sac. This finding was comparable between fresh and frozen cycles. However, in patients under age 35 and using donor egg, no live birth advantage was seen in patients with multiple sacs. In fact, transferring more than one embryo did not increase live birth rate either. CONCLUSIONS Despite the many maternal and fetal risks of multiple pregnancies, patients who achieve a positive pregnancy test with fresh and frozen in-vitro fertilization and who have more than one pregnancy sac are more likely ultimately to deliver at least one baby. This finding is true of both fresh and frozen embryo transfer cycles. This pregnancy advantage is not seen in young patients and in patients using donor egg, and single embryo transfer maximizes birth outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erika Balassiano
- Staten Island University Hospital, 475 Seaview Avenue, Staten Island, NY 10305 USA
| | - Shaveta Malik
- Staten Island University Hospital, 475 Seaview Avenue, Staten Island, NY 10305 USA
| | - Praful Vaid
- Island Reproductive Services, 1110 South Avenue Suite 305, Staten Island, NY 10314 USA
| | - Eric S Knochenhauer
- Staten Island University Hospital, 475 Seaview Avenue, Staten Island, NY 10305 USA
- Island Reproductive Services, 1110 South Avenue Suite 305, Staten Island, NY 10314 USA
| | - Michael L Traub
- Staten Island University Hospital, 475 Seaview Avenue, Staten Island, NY 10305 USA
- Island Reproductive Services, 1110 South Avenue Suite 305, Staten Island, NY 10314 USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Anev I, Wang J, Palep-Singh M, Seif MW. Monochorionic diamniotic twin cervical ectopic pregnancy following assisted conception: a case report. J Reprod Med 2013; 58:445-447. [PMID: 24050036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ectopic pregnancy is a leading cause of maternal mortality. Its incidence has progressively increased in recent years. Assisted conception techniques are associated with a significantly higher rate of ectopic pregnancies. Cervical ectopic pregnancies are very rare, accounting for < 1% of all ectopic pregnancies. CASE A 41-year-old, Caucasian woman presented for routine transvaginal scan at 6 weeks' gestation following a single embryo transfer as part of in vitro fertilization (IVF) follow-up. This revealed a monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy within the cervix. Serum beta-hCG concentration was 18,470 IU/L, and she reported only a mild brown-stained vaginal discharge. She was counseled regarding the risks of this pregnancy and was managed medically, receiving oral mifepristone and systemic methotrexate. She was subsequently monitored with serial serum beta-hCG measurements and transvaginal ultrasonography. After 6 weeks, due to the slow serum beta-hCG decline and lack of spontaneous menstruation, she was counseled regarding the potential risks of the persistent pregnancy and underwent suction evacuation. CONCLUSION This case is an example of a complication of LVF. To the best of our knowledge and following a search of the Medline database, this is the only case of monochorionic twin pregnancy located within the cervical canal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivan Anev
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Mary's Hospital, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|