1
|
Tarantino P, Viale G, Press MF, Hu X, Penault-Llorca F, Bardia A, Batistatou A, Burstein HJ, Carey LA, Cortes J, Denkert C, Diéras V, Jacot W, Koutras AK, Lebeau A, Loibl S, Modi S, Mosele MF, Provenzano E, Pruneri G, Reis-Filho JS, Rojo F, Salgado R, Schmid P, Schnitt SJ, Tolaney SM, Trapani D, Vincent-Salomon A, Wolff AC, Pentheroudakis G, André F, Curigliano G. ESMO expert consensus statements (ECS) on the definition, diagnosis, and management of HER2-low breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2023; 34:645-659. [PMID: 37269905 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 39.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2023] [Revised: 05/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low breast cancer has recently emerged as a targetable subset of breast tumors, based on the evidence from clinical trials of novel anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates. This evolution has raised several biological and clinical questions, warranting the establishment of consensus to optimally treat patients with HER2-low breast tumors. Between 2022 and 2023, the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) held a virtual consensus-building process focused on HER2-low breast cancer. The consensus included a multidisciplinary panel of 32 leading experts in the management of breast cancer from nine different countries. The aim of the consensus was to develop statements on topics that are not covered in detail in the current ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline. The main topics identified for discussion were (i) biology of HER2-low breast cancer; (ii) pathologic diagnosis of HER2-low breast cancer; (iii) clinical management of HER2-low metastatic breast cancer; and (iv) clinical trial design for HER2-low breast cancer. The expert panel was divided into four working groups to address questions relating to one of the four topics outlined above. A review of the relevant scientific literature was conducted in advance. Consensus statements were developed by the working groups and then presented to the entire panel for further discussion and amendment before voting. This article presents the developed statements, including findings from the expert panel discussions, expert opinion, and a summary of evidence supporting each statement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Tarantino
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan
| | - G Viale
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - M F Press
- Department of Pathology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - X Hu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - F Penault-Llorca
- Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer Centre Jean PERRIN, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - A Bardia
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA; Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
| | - A Batistatou
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - H J Burstein
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - L A Carey
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA
| | - J Cortes
- International Breast Cancer Center (IBCC), Pangaea Oncology, Quironsalud Group, Barcelona; Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Department of Medicine, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - C Denkert
- Philipps-University Marburg and University Hospital Marburg (UKGM), Marburg, Germany
| | - V Diéras
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes
| | - W Jacot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier University, INSERM U1194, Montpellier, France
| | - A K Koutras
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University Hospital of Patras, Greece
| | - A Lebeau
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg
| | - S Loibl
- German Breast Group/GBG Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg; Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - S Modi
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - M F Mosele
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institute Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - E Provenzano
- Department of Histopathology, Cambridge University NHS Foundation Trust and NIH Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - G Pruneri
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan; Department of Advanced Diagnostics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - J S Reis-Filho
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - F Rojo
- Department of Pathology, IIS-Fundacion Jimenez Diaz University Hospital-CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain
| | - R Salgado
- Department of Pathology, ZAS, Antwerp, Belgium; Division of Research, Peter Mac Callum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - P Schmid
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University London, London, UK
| | - S J Schnitt
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA; Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, USA
| | - S M Tolaney
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston; Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - D Trapani
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan; European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - A Vincent-Salomon
- Department of Pathology, Diagnostic and Theranostic Medicine Division, Institut Curie, PSL University, Paris, France
| | - A C Wolff
- The Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, USA
| | | | - F André
- INSERM U981 - Molecular Predictors and New Targets in Oncology, PRISM Center for Precision Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - G Curigliano
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan; European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Van Baelen K, Geukens T, Maetens M, Tjan-Heijnen V, Lord CJ, Linn S, Bidard FC, Richard F, Yang WW, Steele RE, Pettitt SJ, Van Ongeval C, De Schepper M, Isnaldi E, Nevelsteen I, Smeets A, Punie K, Voorwerk L, Wildiers H, Floris G, Vincent-Salomon A, Derksen PWB, Neven P, Senkus E, Sawyer E, Kok M, Desmedt C. Current and future diagnostic and treatment strategies for patients with invasive lobular breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2022; 33:769-785. [PMID: 35605746 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Revised: 05/06/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC) is the second most common type of breast cancer after invasive breast cancer of no special type (NST), representing up to 15% of all breast cancers. DESIGN Latest data on ILC are presented, focusing on diagnosis, molecular make-up according to the European Society for Medical Oncology Scale for Clinical Actionability of molecular Targets (ESCAT) guidelines, treatment in the early and metastatic setting and ILC-focused clinical trials. RESULTS At the imaging level, magnetic resonance imaging-based and novel positron emission tomography/computed tomography-based techniques can overcome the limitations of currently used imaging techniques for diagnosing ILC. At the pathology level, E-cadherin immunohistochemistry could help improving inter-pathologist agreement. The majority of patients with ILC do not seem to benefit as much from (neo-)adjuvant chemotherapy as patients with NST, although chemotherapy might be required in a subset of high-risk patients. No differences in treatment efficacy are seen for anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) therapies in the adjuvant setting and cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitors in the metastatic setting. The clinical utility of the commercially available prognostic gene expression-based tests is unclear for patients with ILC. Several ESCAT alterations differ in frequency between ILC and NST. Germline BRCA1 and PALB2 alterations are less frequent in patients with ILC, while germline CDH1 (gene coding for E-cadherin) alterations are more frequent in patients with ILC. Somatic HER2 mutations are more frequent in ILC, especially in metastases (15% ILC versus 5% NST). A high tumour mutational burden, relevant for immune checkpoint inhibition, is more frequent in ILC metastases (16%) than in NST metastases (5%). Tumours with somatic inactivating CDH1 mutations may be vulnerable for treatment with ROS1 inhibitors, a concept currently investigated in early and metastatic ILC. CONCLUSION ILC is a unique malignancy based on its pathological and biological features leading to differences in diagnosis as well as in treatment response, resistance and targets as compared to NST.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Van Baelen
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research (LTBCR), Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Departments of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - T Geukens
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research (LTBCR), Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; General Medical Oncology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - M Maetens
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research (LTBCR), Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - V Tjan-Heijnen
- Medical Oncology Department, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC), School of GROW, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - C J Lord
- The CRUK Gene Function Laboratory and Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - S Linn
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Departments of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - F-C Bidard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, UVSQ/Paris-Saclav University, Paris, France
| | - F Richard
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research (LTBCR), Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - W W Yang
- The CRUK Gene Function Laboratory and Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - R E Steele
- The CRUK Gene Function Laboratory and Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - S J Pettitt
- The CRUK Gene Function Laboratory and Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - C Van Ongeval
- Departments of Radiology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - M De Schepper
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research (LTBCR), Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Pathology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - E Isnaldi
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research (LTBCR), Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - A Smeets
- Surgical Oncology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - K Punie
- General Medical Oncology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - L Voorwerk
- Departments of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Tumour Biology and Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H Wildiers
- General Medical Oncology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - G Floris
- Pathology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - P W B Derksen
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - P Neven
- Departments of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - E Senkus
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - E Sawyer
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Guy's Cancer Centre, King's College London, London, UK
| | - M Kok
- Departments of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Tumour Biology and Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C Desmedt
- Laboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research (LTBCR), Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Loap P, Loirat D, Berger F, Rodrigues M, Bazire L, Pierga J, Ricci F, Cao K, Vincent-Salomon A, Laki F, Ezzili C, Raizonville L, Mosseri V, Neffati S, Ezzalfani M, Fourquet A, Kirova Y. One-Year Toxicity Report of the RADIOPARP Phase I Trial Evaluating Olaparib With Radiotherapy for Triple Negative Breast Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.07.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
4
|
Villy MC, Masliah-Planchon J, Melaabi S, Trabelsi Grati O, Girard E, Bataillon G, Vincent-Salomon A, Le Gall J, Golmard L, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Bieche I, Colas C. Tumor BRCA testing can reveal a high tumor mutational burden related to POLE pathogenic variants. Gynecol Oncol Rep 2021; 37:100855. [PMID: 34541275 PMCID: PMC8435919 DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2021.100855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2021] [Revised: 08/27/2021] [Accepted: 08/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Some gynecologic tumors harbor a POLE pathogenic variant, raising prognostic and therapeutic issues. Tumors harboring a POLE pathogenic variant exhibit multiple BRCA1/2 variants, reflecting the high tumor mutational burden. Tumor BRCA testing could be a way to detect tumors harboring a highly mutagenic POLE pathogenic variant.
Objective Tumors harboring a POLE pathogenic variant, associated with high tumor mutational burden, are good candidates for immunotherapy. However, POLE pathogenic variants are not currently screened in routine clinical practice. Can these tumors be identified by means of an already available test? Methods We describe seven tumors harboring a POLE pathogenic variant, among eight patients with tumors harboring multiple BRCA1/2 variants (from 4 to 20). All patients were managed at Institut Curie, Paris. Five patients were selected because of unexpected tumor BRCA testing results with multiple variants and another three patients were selected because of a POLE pathogenic variant detected by large tumor testing. We looked for other tumor variants by Next-Generation Sequencing in tumors harboring multiple BRCA1/2 variants, and for multiple BRCA1/2 variants in tumors harboring a POLE pathogenic variant. Results Four of the five tumors selected because of multiple BRCA1/2 variants exhibited a POLE pathogenic variant, and all three tumors selected for POLE pathogenic variants exhibited multiple BRCA1/2 variants. Conclusions Tumor BRCA testing could be a way to detect tumors harboring a highly mutagenic POLE pathogenic variant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M-C Villy
- Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - J Masliah-Planchon
- Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, Paris, France.,Paris Sciences & Lettres Research University, Paris, France
| | - S Melaabi
- Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, Paris, France.,Paris Sciences & Lettres Research University, Paris, France
| | - O Trabelsi Grati
- Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, Paris, France.,Paris Sciences & Lettres Research University, Paris, France
| | - E Girard
- Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, Paris, France.,Paris Sciences & Lettres Research University, Paris, France
| | - G Bataillon
- Paris Sciences & Lettres Research University, Paris, France.,Department of Pathology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - A Vincent-Salomon
- Paris Sciences & Lettres Research University, Paris, France.,Department of Pathology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - J Le Gall
- Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, Paris, France.,Paris Sciences & Lettres Research University, Paris, France
| | - L Golmard
- Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, Paris, France.,Paris Sciences & Lettres Research University, Paris, France
| | - D Stoppa-Lyonnet
- Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, Paris, France.,Université de Paris, Paris, France.,Inserm U830, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - I Bieche
- Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, Paris, France.,Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - C Colas
- Department of Genetics, Institut Curie, Paris, France.,Paris Sciences & Lettres Research University, Paris, France.,Inserm U830, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dupain C, Gutman T, Girard E, du Rusquec P, Sablin MP, Tresca P, Neuzillet C, Vincent-Salomon A, Antonio S, Franck C, Galut M, Allory Y, Cyrta J, Guillou I, Wong J, Le Tourneau C, Bièche I, Servant N, Kamal M, Masliah-Planchon J. 75P Tumor mutational burden in clinical routine practice: Identifying the right threshold? Ann Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.08.355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|
6
|
Salgado R, Peg V, Rüschoff J, Vincent-Salomon A, Castellano I, Perner S, Van de Vijver K, Quinn CM, Varga Z. Gene expression signatures for tailoring adjuvant chemotherapy of luminal breast cancer: the pathologists' perspective. Ann Oncol 2021; 32:1316-1321. [PMID: 34461263 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.08.1993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2021] [Revised: 07/04/2021] [Accepted: 08/22/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- R Salgado
- Department of Pathology, GZA-ZNA Hospitals, Antwerp, Belgium; Division of Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - V Peg
- Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Department of Pathology, Vall D'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain; Spanish Biomedical Research Network Centre in Oncology (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain
| | - J Rüschoff
- Targos Molecular Pathology GmbH and Institute of Pathology Nordhessen, Kassel, Germany
| | - A Vincent-Salomon
- Department of Pathology and Department of Diagnostic and Theranostic Medicine, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - I Castellano
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - S Perner
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany; Pathology, Research Center Borstel, Leibniz Lung Center, Borstel, Germany
| | - K Van de Vijver
- Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - C M Quinn
- Department of Pathology, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin and University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Z Varga
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Loap P, Loirat D, Berger F, Rodrigues M, Bazire L, Pierga J, Ricci F, Cao K, Vincent-Salomon A, Laki F, Ezzili C, Jochem A, Raizonville L, Mosseri V, Ezzalfani M, Fourquet A, Kirova Y. OC-0630 Olaparib combined with radiotherapy for TNBC: 1-year toxicity report of the RADIOPARP phase 1 trial. Radiother Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(21)06986-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
8
|
Delaloge S, Dureau S, D'Hondt V, Desmoulins I, Heudel PE, Duhoux F, Levy C, Lerebours F, Mouret-Reynier MA, Dalenc F, Frenel JS, Jouannaud C, Venat-Bouvet L, Nguyen S, Callens C, Gentien D, Manduzio H, Vincent-Salomon A, Lemonnier J, Cottu P. 63O Letrozole and palbociclib versus third generation chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment in luminal breast cancer: Survival results of the UNICANCER-NeoPAL study. Ann Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.03.077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
|
9
|
Chalumeau C, Pierga JY, Pierron G, Ballet S, Nasr S, Vincent-Salomon A, Vuagnat P, Bellesoeur A, Carton M, Bidard F, Lerebours F. 113P Efficacy of oral etoposide associated with trastuzumab in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: Results from the Institut Curie’s database. Ann Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.03.127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
|
10
|
Ben Dhia S, Loap P, Loirat D, Vincent-Salomon A, Cao K, Escalup L, Fourquet A, Kirova Y. [Concurrent radiation therapy and dual HER2 blockade in breast cancer: Assessment of toxicity]. Cancer Radiother 2021; 25:424-431. [PMID: 33771453 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2020.06.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2020] [Revised: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 06/30/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The tolerance of the concurrent use of radiotherapy, pertuzumab and trastuzumab is unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the toxicity of this association in patients treated for HER2 positive metastatic and/or locally recurrent unrespectable breast cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective study was performed in our institution for all consecutive patients treated with concurrent irradiation, pertuzumab and trastuzumab. The radiotherapy was performed while pertuzumab and trastuzumab were administrated as a maintenance treatment at the dose of 420mg (total dose) and 6mg/kg respectively every 3 weeks without chemotherapy. Toxicity was assessed according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was measured at baseline and then every 3-4 months. RESULTS We studied 77 patients. treated in between 2013 and 2019 with median follow-up of 38 months (range 0-264 months). Median age was 53 years (33-86). There were 50 patients (64.9%) with metastatic and 27 patients (35.1%) with recurrent disease. All patients received docetaxel followed by P-T as first line treatment and they received 34 cycles (10-85) of pertuzumab and trastuzumab. All patients experienced partial or complete response according to RECIST criteria. Irradiation volumes were whole breast (41 patients, 53.2%) and chest wall (29 patients, 37.7%) at a dose of 50Gy with a median duration of 39 days. Radiotherapy of lymph nodes was performed in 53 patients (68.8%) as following: supraclavicular-infraclavicular and axillary lymph nodes in 52 patients (67.5%), and internal mammary nodes in 31 patients (40.3%). For 20 patients. (26.0%) radiotherapy was palliative: bone irradiation (12 patients, 15.6%), whole-brain radiotherapy (2 patients, 2.6%), cerebral metastasis irradiation (6 patients). As early toxicity we observed: radio dermatitis as following: 36 patients (46.8%) presented grade I, 17 patients (22.1%) presented grade II, and 3 patients (3.9%) presented grade III. One patient (1.3%) presented grade II esophagitis. One patient (1.3%) presented asymptomatic decrease of LVEF during treatment and 6 patients (7.7%) presented a decrease of LVEF. There was no radiation-induced pneumonitis. As late toxicity, we observed 1 (1.3%) case of grade I and 1 (1.3%) with grade II telangiectasia. There was 1 case (1.3%) of grade III cardiac toxicity, 8 months after the concurrent treatment. CONCLUSION The concurrent use of radiotherapy, pertuzumab and trastuzumab is feasible with good tolerance. Larger prospective data with longer follow-up is needed to confirm these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Ben Dhia
- Institut Curie, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | - P Loap
- Institut Curie, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | - D Loirat
- Institut Curie, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | | | - K Cao
- Institut Curie, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | - L Escalup
- Institut Curie, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | - A Fourquet
- Institut Curie, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Y Kirova
- Institut Curie, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kirova Y, Loirat D, Berger F, Ricci F, Sablin M, Vincent-Salomon A, Laki F, Mosseri V, Ezzalfani M, Fourquet A. RADIOPARP: A Phase I of Olaparib with Radiation Therapy (RT) in Patients with Inflammatory, Loco-regionally Advanced or Metastatic TNBC (Triple Negative Breast Cancer) or Patient with Operated TNBC with Residual Disease. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.07.2117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
12
|
Moukarzel L, Ferrando L, Paula A, Brown D, Geyer F, Pareja F, Piscuoglio S, Papanastasiou A, Fusco N, Marchio C, Abu-Rustum N, Murali R, Brogi E, Wen H, Norton L, Soslow R, Vincent-Salomon A, Reis-Filho J, Weigelt B. Uterine carcinosarcomas and metaplastic breast carcinomas: Genetically related cancers? Gynecol Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.05.587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
13
|
Park JH, Jonas SF, Bataillon G, Criscitiello C, Salgado R, Loi S, Viale G, Lee HJ, Dieci MV, Kim SB, Vincent-Salomon A, Curigliano G, André F, Michiels S. Prognostic value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC) who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Oncol 2019; 30:1941-1949. [PMID: 31566659 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 133] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) have been considered an important prognostic factor in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), there have been limited data on their prognostic value in the absence of adjuvant chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS A pooled analysis was carried out using four cohorts of TNBC patients not treated with chemotherapy. sTILs were evaluated in the most representative tumoral block of surgical specimens. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used for invasive disease-free survival (iDFS), distant disease-free survival (D-DFS), and overall survival (OS), fitting sTILs as a continuous variable adjusted for clinicopathologic factors. RESULTS We analyzed individual data of 476 patients from 4 centers diagnosed between 1989 and 2015. Their median age was 64 years. The median tumor size was 1.6 cm and 83% were node-negative. The median level of sTILs was 10% (Q1-Q3, 4%-30%). Higher grade was associated with higher sTILs (P < 10-3). During follow-up, 107 deaths, and 173 and 118 events for iDFS and D-DFS were observed, respectively. In the multivariable analysis, sTILs obtained an independent prognostic value for all end points (likelihood ratio χ2 = 7.14 for iDFS; P < 10-2; χ2 = 9.63 for D-DFS, P < 10-2; χ2 = 5.96 for OS, P = 0.015). Each 10% increment in sTILs corresponded to a hazard ratio of 0.90 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82 - 0.97] for iDFS, 0.86 (95% CI 0.77 - 0.95) for D-DFS, and 0.88 (95% CI 0.79 - 0.98) for OS, respectively. In patients with pathological stage I tumors with sTILs ≥30% (n = 74), 5-year iDFS was 91% (95% CI 84% to 96%), D-DFS was 97% (95% CI 93% to 100%), and OS was 98% (95% CI 95% to 100%). CONCLUSION sTILs add important prognostic information in systemically untreated early-stage TNBC patients. Notably, sTILs can identify a subset of stage I TNBC patients with an excellent prognosis without adjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J H Park
- Department of Medical Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul; Department of Hemato-Oncology, Konkuk Medical Center, University of Konkuk College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - S F Jonas
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Gustave Roussy; INSERM, Unit 1018, University Paris-Sud, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif
| | - G Bataillon
- Department of Pathology, Institut Curie, Université Paris Sciences Lettres, Paris, France
| | - C Criscitiello
- IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - R Salgado
- GZA, Antwerp, Belgium; Division of Clinical Medicine and Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - S Loi
- Division of Clinical Medicine and Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - G Viale
- Department of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | - H J Lee
- Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - M V Dieci
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova; Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - S-B Kim
- Department of Medical Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul
| | - A Vincent-Salomon
- Department of Pathology, Institut Curie, Université Paris Sciences Lettres, Paris, France; Inserm Unit 934, Paris, France
| | - G Curigliano
- IEO, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - F André
- Department of Oncology, Gustave Roussy; INSERM, Unit 981, University Paris-Sud, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - S Michiels
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Gustave Roussy; INSERM, Unit 1018, University Paris-Sud, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Cottu P, D'Hondt V, Dureau S, Lerebours F, Desmoulins I, Heudel PE, Duhoux FP, Levy C, Mouret-Reynier MA, Dalenc F, Frenel JS, Jouannaud C, Venat-Bouvet L, Nguyen S, Ferrero JM, Canon JL, Grenier J, Callens C, Gentien D, Lemonnier J, Vincent-Salomon A, Delaloge S. Letrozole and palbociclib versus chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy of high-risk luminal breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2019; 29:2334-2340. [PMID: 30307466 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Palbociclib is a CDK4/6 inhibitor with demonstrated efficacy and safety in combination with endocrine therapy in advanced luminal breast cancer (LBC). We evaluated the respective efficacy and safety of chemotherapy and letrozole-palbociclib (LETPAL) combination as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with high-risk LBC. Patients and methods NeoPAL (UCBG10/4, NCT02400567) is a randomised, parallel, non-comparative phase II study. Patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative, Prosigna®-defined luminal B, or luminal A and node-positive, stage II-III breast cancer, not candidate for breast-conserving surgery, were randomly assigned to either letrozole (2.5 mg daily) and palbociclib (125 mg daily, 3 weeks/4) during 19 weeks, or to FEC100 (5FU 500 mg/m2, epirubicin 100 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2)×3 21-day courses followed by docetaxel 100 mg/m2×3 21-day courses. Primary end point was residual cancer burden (RCB 0-I rate). Secondary end points included clinical response, proliferation-based markers, and safety. Results Overall, 106 patients were randomised [median Prosigna® ROR Score 71 (22-93)]. RCB 0-I was observed in four and eight patients in LETPAL [7.7% (95% CI 0.4-14.9)] and chemotherapy [15.7% (95% CI 5.7-25.7)] arms, respectively. Pathological complete response rates were 3.8% and 5.9%. Clinical response (75%) and breast-conserving surgery rates (69%) were similar in both arms. Preoperative Endocrine Prognostic Index 0 scores (breast cancer-specific survival) were observed in 17.6% and 8.0% of patients in LETPAL and chemotherapy arms, respectively. Safety profile was as expected, with 2 versus 17 serious adverse events (including 11 grade 4 serious AEs in the chemotherapy arm). Conclusion LETPAL combination was associated with poor pathological response but encouraging clinical and biomarker responses in Prosigna®-defined high-risk LBC. Contemporary chemotherapy regimen was associated with poor pathological and biomarker responses, with a much less favourable safety profile. LETPAL combination might represent an alternative to chemotherapy in early high-risk LBC. Clinical Trial Number NCT02400567.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Cottu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France; Paris Sciences et Lettres University, Paris, France.
| | - V D'Hondt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - S Dureau
- Department of Biometry, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - F Lerebours
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - I Desmoulins
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - P-E Heudel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - F P Duhoux
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - C Levy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - M-A Mouret-Reynier
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - F Dalenc
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud, IUCT-Oncopole Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - J-S Frenel
- Department of Medical Oncology, ICO Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France
| | - C Jouannaud
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France
| | - L Venat-Bouvet
- Department of Medical Oncology, Limoges University Hospital, Limoges, France
| | - S Nguyen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de Pau, Pau, France
| | - J-M Ferrero
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - J-L Canon
- Department of Oncology-Hematology, Grand Hôpital de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium
| | - J Grenier
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Sainte-Catherine, Avignon, France
| | - C Callens
- Paris Sciences et Lettres University, Paris, France; Pharmacogenomics, Department of Tumor Biology, France
| | - D Gentien
- Paris Sciences et Lettres University, Paris, France; Genomics Platforms, Translational Research Department, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | | | - A Vincent-Salomon
- Paris Sciences et Lettres University, Paris, France; Tumour Biology Department, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - S Delaloge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Masliah-Planchon J, Kamal M, Borcoman E, Girard E, Gestraud P, Bataillon G, Vincent-Salomon A, Lecerf C, Callens C, Antonio S, Franck C, Mariani O, Bieche I, Le Tourneau C, Servois V. Prospective comparative study of next-generation sequencing on fine needle aspirations versus core needle biopsies in cancer patients included in SHIVA02 trial. Ann Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz239.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
16
|
Park J, Jonas S, Dieci M, Bataillon G, Criscitiello C, Viale G, Salgado R, Lee H, Loi S, Kim SB, Curigliano G, Vincent-Salomon A, André F, Michiels S. Prognostic value of tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in patients with early-stage triple negative breast cancers (TNBC) in the absence of chemotherapy. Ann Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz240.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
17
|
Tiako Meyo M, Lavigne M, Leclerc P, Tanguy ML, Kirova Y, Hurgon A, Lalli A, Fourchotte V, Vincent-Salomon A, Escalup L, Cottu P. Lack of benefit of neoadjuvant pertuzumab in high risk HER2 positive breast cancer: A retrospective case-control study of 355 cases with biomarker analysis. Ann Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz241.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
18
|
Faucheux L, Grandclaudon M, Perrot-Dockès M, Sirven P, Berger F, Hamy AS, Fourchotte V, Vincent-Salomon A, Mechta-Grigoriou F, Reyal F, Scholer-Dahirel A, Guillot-Delost M, Soumelis V. A multivariate Th17 metagene for prognostic stratification in T cell non-inflamed triple negative breast cancer. Oncoimmunology 2019; 8:e1624130. [PMID: 31428522 PMCID: PMC6685521 DOI: 10.1080/2162402x.2019.1624130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2019] [Revised: 05/16/2019] [Accepted: 05/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
A diversity of T helper (Th) subsets (Th1, Th2, Th17) has been identified in the human tumor microenvironment. In breast cancer, the role of Th subsets remains controversial, and a systematic study integrating Th subset diversity, T cell inflammation, breast cancer molecular subtypes, and patient prognosis, is lacking. In primary untreated breast cancer samples, we analyzed 19 Th cytokines at the protein level. Eight were T cell-specific, and subsequently measured in 106 prospectively-collected untreated samples. The dominant Th cytokines across all breast cancer samples were IFN-γ and IL-2. Th2 cytokines (IL-4, IL-5, IL-13) were expressed at low levels and not associated with any breast cancer subtype. Th17 cytokines (IL-17A and IL-17F) were up-regulated in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), specifically in T cell non-inflamed tumors. In order to get insight into prognosis, we exploited the METABRIC transcriptomic dataset. We derived Th1, Th2, and Th17 metagenes based on manually curated Th signatures, and found that a high Th17 metagene was of good prognosis in T cell non-inflamed TNBC. Multivariate Cox modeling selected the Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI), Th2 and Th17 metagenes as additive predictors of breast cancer-specific survival, which defined novel and highly distinct prognostic groups within TNBC. Our results reveal that Th17 is a novel prognostic composite biomarker in T cell non-inflamed TNBC. Integrating immune cell and tumor molecular diversity is an efficient strategy for prognostic stratification of cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Faucheux
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.,Immunity and Cancer, Integrative Biology of Human Dendritic Cells and T Cells Laboratory, UMR 932 Immunity and Cancer, INSERM, Paris, France
| | - M Grandclaudon
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.,Immunity and Cancer, Integrative Biology of Human Dendritic Cells and T Cells Laboratory, UMR 932 Immunity and Cancer, INSERM, Paris, France
| | - M Perrot-Dockès
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.,Immunity and Cancer, Integrative Biology of Human Dendritic Cells and T Cells Laboratory, UMR 932 Immunity and Cancer, INSERM, Paris, France
| | - P Sirven
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.,Stress and cancer laboratory, U830 Genetics and Biology of cancers, INSERM, Paris, France
| | - F Berger
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.,U900, Unit of biometry, INSERM, Paris, France
| | - A S Hamy
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.,Departement of translational research, Residual tumor and response to treatment laboratory (RT2Lab), UMR 932 Immunity and Cancer, INSERM, Paris, France
| | - V Fourchotte
- Departement of Surgical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - A Vincent-Salomon
- Diagnostic and Theranostic medicine division, Institut Curie, Paris, France.,Department of Biopathology, U934, INSERM, Paris, France
| | - F Mechta-Grigoriou
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.,Stress and cancer laboratory, U830 Genetics and Biology of cancers, INSERM, Paris, France
| | - F Reyal
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.,Departement of translational research, Residual tumor and response to treatment laboratory (RT2Lab), UMR 932 Immunity and Cancer, INSERM, Paris, France.,Departement of Surgical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - A Scholer-Dahirel
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.,Stress and cancer laboratory, U830 Genetics and Biology of cancers, INSERM, Paris, France
| | - M Guillot-Delost
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.,Immunity and Cancer, Integrative Biology of Human Dendritic Cells and T Cells Laboratory, UMR 932 Immunity and Cancer, INSERM, Paris, France.,Center of Clinical Investigation, CIC IGR-Curie 1428, Paris, France
| | - V Soumelis
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris, France.,Immunity and Cancer, Integrative Biology of Human Dendritic Cells and T Cells Laboratory, UMR 932 Immunity and Cancer, INSERM, Paris, France.,Center of Clinical Investigation, CIC IGR-Curie 1428, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Pareja F, Gularte-Merida R, Da Cruz Paula A, Brown D, Geyer FC, Piscuoglio S, Marchio C, Vincent-Salomon A, Brogi E, Weigelt B, Reis-Filho JS. Abstract P3-06-07: Recurrent but not pathognomonic fusion genes in mucinous carcinomas of the breast. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p3-06-07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: Mucinous carcinoma of the breast (MCB) is a rare histologic subtype of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive invasive carcinoma, and is characterized by tumor cells floating in pools of mucin. Despite their characteristic histology, MCBs are heterogeneous at the genetic level and no driver genetic alterations have been identified. Notably, MCBs lack the common genetic alterations found in ER-positive invasive ductal carcinomas (i.e. 16q losses, 1q gains and PIK3CA mutations). Fusion genes have been reported in breast cancer, including highly recurrent or pathognomonic fusions genes, such as the ETV6-NTRK3 and MYB/MYBL1 rearrangements in secretory carcinoma and adenoid cystic carcinoma, respectively. In this study we sought to define whether MCBs would be underpinned by a pathognomonic fusion gene.
Materials and methods: Seven pure mucinous A (hypocellular), seven pure mucinous B (hypercellular), and the mucinous component of a mixed MCB were microdissected, and subjected to RNA extraction followed by RNA-sequencing for fusion gene discovery. Read pairs supporting chimeric transcripts were identified using INTEGRATE, FusionCatcher and STARfusion. The Bayesian driver probability of the candidate fusion genes was annotated using OncoFuse. In-frame fusion gene candidates with a high driver probability were validated using orthogonal methods (RT-PCR and Sanger sequencing).
Results: Our analysis identified fusion genes in 47% (7/15) of the MCBs analyzed (29% (2/7) of type A MCBs, 57% (4/7) type B MCBs and in the mucinous component of one mixed MCB). The OAZ1-CSNK1G2 and RFC4-LPP fusion genes were identified in 20% (3/15) and 13% (2/15) of the cases, respectively. The OAZ1-CSNK1G2 chimeric transcript results in the truncation of the kinase domain of CSNK1G2, which represses ER transactivation. The RFC4-LPP chimeric transcript leads to the fusion of exons 1-3 of RFC4 and exons 5-11 of LPP, where the LIM domains of LPP are conserved. LPP is a known partner of fusion genes identified in mesenchymal tumors and reported to mediate TGF-β induced breast oncogenesis via its LIM domain. Additional validated, potentially pathogenic fusion genes identified in MCBs involved kinases, phosphatases or regulators of tyrosine kinase receptor signaling, such as IRAK3-PPM1H (n=1), GIGYF2–GFRA3 (n=1) and PHF20-FAM217B (n=1).
Conclusions: MCBs harbor fusion genes in almost half of the cases with two fusions being recurrent, involving primarily genes encoding kinases, phosphatases or receptor tyrosine kinase signaling regulators. Nevertheless, due to the lack of recurrence of a specific fusion gene, this special histologic type of breast cancer is unlikely to be underpinned by a highly recurrent/ pathognomonic pathogenic fusion gene.
Citation Format: Pareja F, Gularte-Merida R, Da Cruz Paula A, Brown D, Geyer FC, Piscuoglio S, Marchio C, Vincent-Salomon A, Brogi E, Weigelt B, Reis-Filho JS. Recurrent but not pathognomonic fusion genes in mucinous carcinomas of the breast [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-06-07.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Pareja
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland; FPO-IRCS Candiolo Cancer Institute, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Institute Curie, Paris, France
| | - R Gularte-Merida
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland; FPO-IRCS Candiolo Cancer Institute, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Institute Curie, Paris, France
| | - A Da Cruz Paula
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland; FPO-IRCS Candiolo Cancer Institute, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Institute Curie, Paris, France
| | - D Brown
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland; FPO-IRCS Candiolo Cancer Institute, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Institute Curie, Paris, France
| | - FC Geyer
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland; FPO-IRCS Candiolo Cancer Institute, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Institute Curie, Paris, France
| | - S Piscuoglio
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland; FPO-IRCS Candiolo Cancer Institute, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Institute Curie, Paris, France
| | - C Marchio
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland; FPO-IRCS Candiolo Cancer Institute, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Institute Curie, Paris, France
| | - A Vincent-Salomon
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland; FPO-IRCS Candiolo Cancer Institute, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Institute Curie, Paris, France
| | - E Brogi
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland; FPO-IRCS Candiolo Cancer Institute, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Institute Curie, Paris, France
| | - B Weigelt
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland; FPO-IRCS Candiolo Cancer Institute, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Institute Curie, Paris, France
| | - JS Reis-Filho
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland; FPO-IRCS Candiolo Cancer Institute, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Institute Curie, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Hamy AS, Bonsang-Kitzis H, De Croze D, Laas E, Darrigues L, Topciu L, Menet E, Vincent-Salomon A, Lerebours F, Pierga JY, Brain E, Feron JG, Benchimol G, Lam GT, Laé M, Reyal F. Abstract P3-11-01: Interaction between molecular subtype and stromal immune infiltration dynamics in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p3-11-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose: High levels of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) before neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) are associated with higher pathological complete response (pCR) rates, and better survival in TNBC and HER2-positive breast cancers (BCs). We investigated the value of changes in TIL levels and final TIL levels after treatment, by evaluating lymphocyte infiltration before and after NAC in a real-life BC cohort.
Patients and methods: We assessed stromal TIL levels in 716 pre- and post-treatment matched paired specimens, according to the guidelines of the international TIL working group.
Results: Pre-NAC TIL levels were higher in tumors for which pCR was achieved than in cases of residual disease (33.9% versus 20.3%, p=0.001), in luminal tumors and TNBCs, but not in HER2-positive BCs, (pInteraction =0.001). The association between pre-NAC TIL levels and pCR was non-linear in TNBCs (p=0.005). Mean TIL levels decreased during NAC (pre-NAC TILs: 24.1% versus post-NAC TILs: 13.0%, p<0.001). This decrease was strongly associated with high pCR rates, and TIL level variation was strongly inversely correlated with pre-NAC TIL levels (r=-0.80, p<0.001). Pre-NAC TILs and disease-free survival (DFS) were associated in a non-linear manner (p<0.001). High post-NAC TIL levels were associated with aggressive tumor characteristics and with impaired DFS in HER2-positive BCs (HR=1.04, CI [1.02-1.06], p=0.001), but not in luminal tumors or TNBCs (pInteraction =0.04).
Conclusion: The associations of pre, post-NAC TIL levels with response to treatment and DFS differ between BC subtypes and may deviate from linearity. The characterization of immune subpopulations may improve our understanding of the complex interactions between pre- or post-NAC setting, BC subtype, response to treatment and prognosis.
Citation Format: Hamy A-S, Bonsang-Kitzis H, De Croze D, Laas E, Darrigues L, Topciu L, Menet E, Vincent-Salomon A, Lerebours F, Pierga J-Y, Brain E, Feron J-G, Benchimol G, Lam G-T, Laé M, Reyal F. Interaction between molecular subtype and stromal immune infiltration dynamics in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-11-01.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A-S Hamy
- Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, PSL Research University, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Institut Curie, Paris, France; PSL Research University, Institut Curie, Paris, France; Hôpital René Huguenin, Saint-Cloud, France; Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France; Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - H Bonsang-Kitzis
- Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, PSL Research University, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Institut Curie, Paris, France; PSL Research University, Institut Curie, Paris, France; Hôpital René Huguenin, Saint-Cloud, France; Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France; Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - D De Croze
- Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, PSL Research University, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Institut Curie, Paris, France; PSL Research University, Institut Curie, Paris, France; Hôpital René Huguenin, Saint-Cloud, France; Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France; Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - E Laas
- Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, PSL Research University, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Institut Curie, Paris, France; PSL Research University, Institut Curie, Paris, France; Hôpital René Huguenin, Saint-Cloud, France; Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France; Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - L Darrigues
- Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, PSL Research University, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Institut Curie, Paris, France; PSL Research University, Institut Curie, Paris, France; Hôpital René Huguenin, Saint-Cloud, France; Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France; Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - L Topciu
- Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, PSL Research University, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Institut Curie, Paris, France; PSL Research University, Institut Curie, Paris, France; Hôpital René Huguenin, Saint-Cloud, France; Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France; Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - E Menet
- Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, PSL Research University, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Institut Curie, Paris, France; PSL Research University, Institut Curie, Paris, France; Hôpital René Huguenin, Saint-Cloud, France; Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France; Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - A Vincent-Salomon
- Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, PSL Research University, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Institut Curie, Paris, France; PSL Research University, Institut Curie, Paris, France; Hôpital René Huguenin, Saint-Cloud, France; Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France; Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - F Lerebours
- Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, PSL Research University, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Institut Curie, Paris, France; PSL Research University, Institut Curie, Paris, France; Hôpital René Huguenin, Saint-Cloud, France; Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France; Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - J-Y Pierga
- Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, PSL Research University, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Institut Curie, Paris, France; PSL Research University, Institut Curie, Paris, France; Hôpital René Huguenin, Saint-Cloud, France; Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France; Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - E Brain
- Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, PSL Research University, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Institut Curie, Paris, France; PSL Research University, Institut Curie, Paris, France; Hôpital René Huguenin, Saint-Cloud, France; Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France; Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - J-G Feron
- Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, PSL Research University, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Institut Curie, Paris, France; PSL Research University, Institut Curie, Paris, France; Hôpital René Huguenin, Saint-Cloud, France; Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France; Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - G Benchimol
- Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, PSL Research University, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Institut Curie, Paris, France; PSL Research University, Institut Curie, Paris, France; Hôpital René Huguenin, Saint-Cloud, France; Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France; Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - G-T Lam
- Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, PSL Research University, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Institut Curie, Paris, France; PSL Research University, Institut Curie, Paris, France; Hôpital René Huguenin, Saint-Cloud, France; Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France; Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - M Laé
- Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, PSL Research University, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Institut Curie, Paris, France; PSL Research University, Institut Curie, Paris, France; Hôpital René Huguenin, Saint-Cloud, France; Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France; Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - F Reyal
- Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, PSL Research University, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Institut Curie, Paris, France; PSL Research University, Institut Curie, Paris, France; Hôpital René Huguenin, Saint-Cloud, France; Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France; Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Darrigues L, Slembrouck L, Mittempergher L, Delahaye LJ, Vanden Bempt I, Vander Borght S, Vliegen L, Sintubin P, Raynal V, Bohec M, Reyes C, Rapinat A, Helsmoortel C, Jongen L, Hoste G, Neven P, Wildiers H, Smeets A, Nevelsteen I, Punie K, Van Nieuwenhuysen E, Han S, Laurent C, Vincent-Salomon A, Laas-Faron E, Witteveen AT, Neijenhuis S, Glas AM, Floris G, Reyal F. Abstract P4-02-07: Comparison of breast cancer molecular subtyping by Immunohistochemistry and by BluePrint® next generation RNA sequencing-based test at University Hospitals Leuven and Curie Institute Paris. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p4-02-07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
MammaPrint® (MP) and BluePrint® (BP) are microarray-based tests with MP being prognostic for distant recurrence and BP enabling stratification into breast cancer molecular subtypes (Luminal, HER2, Basal-type). Recently, a CE marked MP and BP targeted RNA Next Generation Sequencing (NGS)-based kit was developed at Agendia and validated at University Hospitals Leuven and Curie Institute Paris. Here we compare breast cancer molecular subtype stratification defined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and by MP and BP NGS- and microarray- based tests.
Patients and Methods
In this study, 124 primary operable invasive breast cancer patients were included at University Hospitals Leuven and at Curie Institute (n=80 Leuven; n=44 Curie) with the following histological subtypes: ductal-NOS (n=100), lobular (n=16), mucinous (n=3), tubular (n=2), others (n=3). Patients with bilateral breast cancer or with >3 positive lymph nodes were excluded. Surrogate breast cancer subtypes based on IHC were defined as follows: luminal if ≥10% estrogen receptor (ER) expression; triple negative if <10% ER and progesterone receptor (PR) expression and HER2 stained negative by IHC and/or FISH; HER2+ if HER2 receptor stained positive (2+ or 3+) by IHC and/or FISH. Luminal subtypes were further stratified into Luminal A-like (HER2 negative, Ki-67<14%, PR≥20%) and Luminal B-like (HER2 negative or positive, Ki-67 ≥14%, PR<20%). When Ki-67% was not available, tumors with grade 1 or 2 were classified as Luminal A-like and with grade 3 as Luminal B-like. IHC subtypes were compared to the BP NGS and microarray molecular subtypes (Luminal-, HER2- and Basal-type). To further stratify BP luminal type tumors, MP test was used as follows: Luminal A (BP Luminal and MP low risk) and Luminal B (BP Luminal and MP high risk).
Results
Concordance between IHC and MP/BP NGS subtyping was 75.0% (93/124), while concordance between MP/BP on NGS and microarray was 89.5% (111/124). MP/BP NGS subtyping identified more low risk Luminal A tumors compared to IHC (54.0%, (67/124) vs 44.3% (55/124)). Notably, concordance was excellent for triple-negative and, to less extent for HER2 driven tumors (Luminal B-like-HER2 positive and HER2+).
IHC vs. MP/BP NGS molecular subtyping (n=124) MP/BP NGSIHCLuminal ALuminal BHER2-positiveBasalTotalLuminal A-like4690055Luminal B-like, HER2-negative16210037Luminal B-like, HER2-positive565016HER2-positive00303Triple negative0101213Total6737812124Microarray vs MP/BP NGS molecular subtyping (n=124) MP/BP NGSMicroarrayLuminal ALuminal BHER2 positiveBasalTotalLuminal A6040064Luminal B7310038HER2-positive028010Basal0001212Total6737812124
Conclusion
This study shows a discordance of 25.0% between IHC and BP/MP NGS subtyping. This is in line with previous findings where IHC was compared to molecular subtyping based on microarray (Viale 2017, Whitworth 2014) underlining the complementarity of genomic testing in early stage breast cancer. Moreover, we observed a high concordance between NGS and microarray molecular subtyping, which suggests a successful translation of the MP/BP microarray test to a MP/BP NGS test.
Citation Format: Darrigues L, Slembrouck L, Mittempergher L, Delahaye LJ, Vanden Bempt I, Vander Borght S, Vliegen L, Sintubin P, Raynal V, Bohec M, Reyes C, Rapinat A, Helsmoortel C, Jongen L, Hoste G, Neven P, Wildiers H, Smeets A, Nevelsteen I, Punie K, Van Nieuwenhuysen E, Han S, Laurent C, Vincent-Salomon A, Laas-Faron E, Witteveen AT, Neijenhuis S, Glas AM, Floris G, Reyal F. Comparison of breast cancer molecular subtyping by Immunohistochemistry and by BluePrint® next generation RNA sequencing-based test at University Hospitals Leuven and Curie Institute Paris [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-02-07.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Darrigues
- Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Medical Affairs, Agendia, Amsterdam, Netherlands; KU Leuven – University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; KU Leuven - University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Next Generation Sequencing Platform, Genomics Platform, Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven – University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Genomics Core, Leuven, Belgium; Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, PSL Research University, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Laboratory of Translational Cell & Tissue Research and University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Pathology, Leuven, Belgium
| | - L Slembrouck
- Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Medical Affairs, Agendia, Amsterdam, Netherlands; KU Leuven – University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; KU Leuven - University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Next Generation Sequencing Platform, Genomics Platform, Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven – University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Genomics Core, Leuven, Belgium; Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, PSL Research University, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Laboratory of Translational Cell & Tissue Research and University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Pathology, Leuven, Belgium
| | - L Mittempergher
- Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Medical Affairs, Agendia, Amsterdam, Netherlands; KU Leuven – University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; KU Leuven - University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Next Generation Sequencing Platform, Genomics Platform, Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven – University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Genomics Core, Leuven, Belgium; Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, PSL Research University, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Laboratory of Translational Cell & Tissue Research and University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Pathology, Leuven, Belgium
| | - LJ Delahaye
- Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Medical Affairs, Agendia, Amsterdam, Netherlands; KU Leuven – University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; KU Leuven - University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Next Generation Sequencing Platform, Genomics Platform, Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven – University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Genomics Core, Leuven, Belgium; Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, PSL Research University, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Laboratory of Translational Cell & Tissue Research and University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Pathology, Leuven, Belgium
| | - I Vanden Bempt
- Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Medical Affairs, Agendia, Amsterdam, Netherlands; KU Leuven – University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; KU Leuven - University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Next Generation Sequencing Platform, Genomics Platform, Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven – University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Genomics Core, Leuven, Belgium; Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, PSL Research University, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Laboratory of Translational Cell & Tissue Research and University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Pathology, Leuven, Belgium
| | - S Vander Borght
- Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Medical Affairs, Agendia, Amsterdam, Netherlands; KU Leuven – University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; KU Leuven - University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Next Generation Sequencing Platform, Genomics Platform, Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven – University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Genomics Core, Leuven, Belgium; Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, PSL Research University, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Laboratory of Translational Cell & Tissue Research and University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Pathology, Leuven, Belgium
| | - L Vliegen
- Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Medical Affairs, Agendia, Amsterdam, Netherlands; KU Leuven – University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; KU Leuven - University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Next Generation Sequencing Platform, Genomics Platform, Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven – University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Genomics Core, Leuven, Belgium; Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, PSL Research University, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Laboratory of Translational Cell & Tissue Research and University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Pathology, Leuven, Belgium
| | - P Sintubin
- Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Medical Affairs, Agendia, Amsterdam, Netherlands; KU Leuven – University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; KU Leuven - University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Next Generation Sequencing Platform, Genomics Platform, Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven – University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Genomics Core, Leuven, Belgium; Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, PSL Research University, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Laboratory of Translational Cell & Tissue Research and University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Pathology, Leuven, Belgium
| | - V Raynal
- Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Medical Affairs, Agendia, Amsterdam, Netherlands; KU Leuven – University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; KU Leuven - University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Next Generation Sequencing Platform, Genomics Platform, Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven – University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Genomics Core, Leuven, Belgium; Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, PSL Research University, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Laboratory of Translational Cell & Tissue Research and University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Pathology, Leuven, Belgium
| | - M Bohec
- Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Medical Affairs, Agendia, Amsterdam, Netherlands; KU Leuven – University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; KU Leuven - University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Next Generation Sequencing Platform, Genomics Platform, Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven – University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Genomics Core, Leuven, Belgium; Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, PSL Research University, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Laboratory of Translational Cell & Tissue Research and University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Pathology, Leuven, Belgium
| | - C Reyes
- Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Medical Affairs, Agendia, Amsterdam, Netherlands; KU Leuven – University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; KU Leuven - University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Next Generation Sequencing Platform, Genomics Platform, Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven – University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Genomics Core, Leuven, Belgium; Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, PSL Research University, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Laboratory of Translational Cell & Tissue Research and University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Pathology, Leuven, Belgium
| | - A Rapinat
- Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Medical Affairs, Agendia, Amsterdam, Netherlands; KU Leuven – University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; KU Leuven - University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Next Generation Sequencing Platform, Genomics Platform, Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven – University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Genomics Core, Leuven, Belgium; Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, PSL Research University, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Laboratory of Translational Cell & Tissue Research and University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Pathology, Leuven, Belgium
| | - C Helsmoortel
- Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Medical Affairs, Agendia, Amsterdam, Netherlands; KU Leuven – University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; KU Leuven - University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Next Generation Sequencing Platform, Genomics Platform, Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven – University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Genomics Core, Leuven, Belgium; Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, PSL Research University, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Laboratory of Translational Cell & Tissue Research and University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Pathology, Leuven, Belgium
| | - L Jongen
- Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Medical Affairs, Agendia, Amsterdam, Netherlands; KU Leuven – University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; KU Leuven - University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Next Generation Sequencing Platform, Genomics Platform, Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven – University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Genomics Core, Leuven, Belgium; Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, PSL Research University, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Laboratory of Translational Cell & Tissue Research and University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Pathology, Leuven, Belgium
| | - G Hoste
- Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Medical Affairs, Agendia, Amsterdam, Netherlands; KU Leuven – University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; KU Leuven - University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Next Generation Sequencing Platform, Genomics Platform, Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven – University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Genomics Core, Leuven, Belgium; Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, PSL Research University, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Laboratory of Translational Cell & Tissue Research and University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Pathology, Leuven, Belgium
| | - P Neven
- Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Medical Affairs, Agendia, Amsterdam, Netherlands; KU Leuven – University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; KU Leuven - University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Next Generation Sequencing Platform, Genomics Platform, Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven – University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Genomics Core, Leuven, Belgium; Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, PSL Research University, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Laboratory of Translational Cell & Tissue Research and University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Pathology, Leuven, Belgium
| | - H Wildiers
- Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Medical Affairs, Agendia, Amsterdam, Netherlands; KU Leuven – University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; KU Leuven - University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Next Generation Sequencing Platform, Genomics Platform, Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven – University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Genomics Core, Leuven, Belgium; Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, PSL Research University, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Laboratory of Translational Cell & Tissue Research and University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Pathology, Leuven, Belgium
| | - A Smeets
- Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Medical Affairs, Agendia, Amsterdam, Netherlands; KU Leuven – University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; KU Leuven - University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Next Generation Sequencing Platform, Genomics Platform, Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven – University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Genomics Core, Leuven, Belgium; Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, PSL Research University, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Laboratory of Translational Cell & Tissue Research and University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Pathology, Leuven, Belgium
| | - I Nevelsteen
- Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Medical Affairs, Agendia, Amsterdam, Netherlands; KU Leuven – University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; KU Leuven - University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Next Generation Sequencing Platform, Genomics Platform, Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven – University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Genomics Core, Leuven, Belgium; Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, PSL Research University, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Laboratory of Translational Cell & Tissue Research and University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Pathology, Leuven, Belgium
| | - K Punie
- Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Medical Affairs, Agendia, Amsterdam, Netherlands; KU Leuven – University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; KU Leuven - University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Next Generation Sequencing Platform, Genomics Platform, Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven – University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Genomics Core, Leuven, Belgium; Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, PSL Research University, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Laboratory of Translational Cell & Tissue Research and University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Pathology, Leuven, Belgium
| | - E Van Nieuwenhuysen
- Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Medical Affairs, Agendia, Amsterdam, Netherlands; KU Leuven – University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; KU Leuven - University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Next Generation Sequencing Platform, Genomics Platform, Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven – University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Genomics Core, Leuven, Belgium; Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, PSL Research University, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Laboratory of Translational Cell & Tissue Research and University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Pathology, Leuven, Belgium
| | - S Han
- Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Medical Affairs, Agendia, Amsterdam, Netherlands; KU Leuven – University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; KU Leuven - University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Next Generation Sequencing Platform, Genomics Platform, Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven – University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Genomics Core, Leuven, Belgium; Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, PSL Research University, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Laboratory of Translational Cell & Tissue Research and University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Pathology, Leuven, Belgium
| | - C Laurent
- Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Medical Affairs, Agendia, Amsterdam, Netherlands; KU Leuven – University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; KU Leuven - University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Next Generation Sequencing Platform, Genomics Platform, Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven – University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Genomics Core, Leuven, Belgium; Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, PSL Research University, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Laboratory of Translational Cell & Tissue Research and University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Pathology, Leuven, Belgium
| | - A Vincent-Salomon
- Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Medical Affairs, Agendia, Amsterdam, Netherlands; KU Leuven – University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; KU Leuven - University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Next Generation Sequencing Platform, Genomics Platform, Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven – University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Genomics Core, Leuven, Belgium; Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, PSL Research University, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Laboratory of Translational Cell & Tissue Research and University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Pathology, Leuven, Belgium
| | - E Laas-Faron
- Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Medical Affairs, Agendia, Amsterdam, Netherlands; KU Leuven – University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; KU Leuven - University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Next Generation Sequencing Platform, Genomics Platform, Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven – University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Genomics Core, Leuven, Belgium; Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, PSL Research University, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Laboratory of Translational Cell & Tissue Research and University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Pathology, Leuven, Belgium
| | - AT Witteveen
- Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Medical Affairs, Agendia, Amsterdam, Netherlands; KU Leuven – University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; KU Leuven - University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Next Generation Sequencing Platform, Genomics Platform, Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven – University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Genomics Core, Leuven, Belgium; Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, PSL Research University, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Laboratory of Translational Cell & Tissue Research and University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Pathology, Leuven, Belgium
| | - S Neijenhuis
- Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Medical Affairs, Agendia, Amsterdam, Netherlands; KU Leuven – University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; KU Leuven - University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Next Generation Sequencing Platform, Genomics Platform, Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven – University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Genomics Core, Leuven, Belgium; Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, PSL Research University, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Laboratory of Translational Cell & Tissue Research and University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Pathology, Leuven, Belgium
| | - AM Glas
- Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Medical Affairs, Agendia, Amsterdam, Netherlands; KU Leuven – University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; KU Leuven - University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Next Generation Sequencing Platform, Genomics Platform, Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven – University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Genomics Core, Leuven, Belgium; Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, PSL Research University, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Laboratory of Translational Cell & Tissue Research and University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Pathology, Leuven, Belgium
| | - G Floris
- Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Medical Affairs, Agendia, Amsterdam, Netherlands; KU Leuven – University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; KU Leuven - University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Next Generation Sequencing Platform, Genomics Platform, Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven – University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Genomics Core, Leuven, Belgium; Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, PSL Research University, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Laboratory of Translational Cell & Tissue Research and University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Pathology, Leuven, Belgium
| | - F Reyal
- Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Medical Affairs, Agendia, Amsterdam, Netherlands; KU Leuven – University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; KU Leuven - University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Next Generation Sequencing Platform, Genomics Platform, Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven – University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, Genomics Core, Leuven, Belgium; Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, PSL Research University, INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Curie Institute, Paris, France; KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Laboratory of Translational Cell & Tissue Research and University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Pathology, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Da Cruz Paula A, Brown D, Geyer FC, Smith E, Pareja F, Papanastasiou AD, Fusco N, Marchio C, Brogi E, Wen HY, Vincent-Salomon A, Norton L, Weigelt B, Reis-Filho JS. Abstract P3-07-02: Metaplastic breast carcinomas and uterine carcinosarcomas are histologically and genetically related. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p3-07-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: Metaplastic breast carcinomas (MBCs) and uterine carcinosarcomas (UCSs) are histologically similar, being often characterized by an admixture of adenocarcinoma areas with areas displaying sarcomatoid differentiation. We sought to investigate whether their histologic similarities would be paralleled by similar patterns of genetic alterations, and to determine whether the different histologic components of MBCs and UCSs would be clonally related.
Methods: Whole exome sequencing (WES) data from 35 MBCs previously analyzed by our group and 57 UCSs from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) study were reanalyzed. Somatic single nucleotide variants were detected with MuTect and indels with Strelka, Varscan2, Scalpel and Lancet. Copy number alterations were inferred using FACETS and functional annotation of the non-synonymous somatic mutations, amplifications or homozygous deletions was performed. We further microdissected the histologically distinct components of 11 MBCs and six UCSs and subjected each component to WES. Clonal decomposition was performed using PyClone.
Results: The most frequent somatic mutations identified in MBCs were TP53 (69%), PIK3CA (29%), FAT3 (26%) and PTEN (14%), whereas the most frequently mutated genes in UCSs were TP53 (84%), FBXW7 (35%), PIK3CA (29%), PTEN (15%) and PPP2R1A (15%). MBCs displayed a significantly higher frequency of mutations targeting FAT3 (26% vs 4%, P<0.01), FAT1 (11% vs 0%, P<0.05) and CHERP (11% vs 0%, P<0.05) than UCSs. UCSs more frequently harbored mutations affecting FBXW7 (35% vs 0%; P<0.01) and PPP2R1A (15% vs 0%, P<0.05) than MBCs. MBCs and UCSs displayed similar copy number alteration profiles, with frequent gains/ amplification of 8q, 3q and 1q, and losses of 8p. Pathway analysis based on the genes targeted by somatic genetic alterations revealed that both MBCs and UCSs were underpinned by genetic alterations resulting in activation of similar pathways, including PI3K, p53, Wnt and Notch signaling. Analysis of the separate components of MBCs and UCSs revealed that the histologically distinct components of MBCs and UCSs are clonally-related, with a median of 71% (range 26%-93%) and 78% (range 30%-93%) of somatic mutations being shared by the distinct components in MBCs and UCSs, respectively. In MBCs, clonal TP53, NOTCH3, KMT2D, FAT4 and PIK3CA mutations and several copy number alterations were shared by the histologically distinct components. Mutations private to each of the histologically distinct components included PIK3R1, CHERP and MAPK14 mutations. The carcinomatous and sarcomatous components of UCSs shared clonal TP53, PIK3CA, CDKN2A, ITGB7 and FGFR2 mutations. Private KMT2B mutations were identified in the UCS carcinomatous components. PyClone analysis revealed that the clonally-related histologically distinct components of each case harbored intra-component genetic heterogeneity coupled with parallel evolution.
Conclusions: Our findings support the contention that UCSs constitute the uterine counterpart of MBCs due to their similar histology and patterns of genetic alterations affecting the same signaling pathways (i.e. TP53, PI3K, Wnt and Notch). In each MBC and UCS analyzed here, the histologically distinct components were found to be clonally related.
Citation Format: Da Cruz Paula A, Brown D, Geyer FC, Smith E, Pareja F, Papanastasiou AD, Fusco N, Marchio C, Brogi E, Wen HY, Vincent-Salomon A, Norton L, Weigelt B, Reis-Filho JS. Metaplastic breast carcinomas and uterine carcinosarcomas are histologically and genetically related [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-07-02.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Da Cruz Paula
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; FPO-IRCCS Candiolo Cancer Institute, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Institute Curie, Paris, France
| | - D Brown
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; FPO-IRCCS Candiolo Cancer Institute, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Institute Curie, Paris, France
| | - FC Geyer
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; FPO-IRCCS Candiolo Cancer Institute, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Institute Curie, Paris, France
| | - E Smith
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; FPO-IRCCS Candiolo Cancer Institute, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Institute Curie, Paris, France
| | - F Pareja
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; FPO-IRCCS Candiolo Cancer Institute, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Institute Curie, Paris, France
| | - AD Papanastasiou
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; FPO-IRCCS Candiolo Cancer Institute, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Institute Curie, Paris, France
| | - N Fusco
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; FPO-IRCCS Candiolo Cancer Institute, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Institute Curie, Paris, France
| | - C Marchio
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; FPO-IRCCS Candiolo Cancer Institute, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Institute Curie, Paris, France
| | - E Brogi
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; FPO-IRCCS Candiolo Cancer Institute, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Institute Curie, Paris, France
| | - HY Wen
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; FPO-IRCCS Candiolo Cancer Institute, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Institute Curie, Paris, France
| | - A Vincent-Salomon
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; FPO-IRCCS Candiolo Cancer Institute, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Institute Curie, Paris, France
| | - L Norton
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; FPO-IRCCS Candiolo Cancer Institute, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Institute Curie, Paris, France
| | - B Weigelt
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; FPO-IRCCS Candiolo Cancer Institute, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Institute Curie, Paris, France
| | - JS Reis-Filho
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; FPO-IRCCS Candiolo Cancer Institute, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Institute Curie, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Borcoman E, Ngo C, Rapinat A, Simaga F, Mariani O, Fuhrmann L, Jeannot E, Laé M, Pierga JY, Gentien D, Pierron G, Morel P, Brauer HA, Vincent-Salomon A. Abstract P6-17-25: PAM50 and CGH-array genomic characterization of HER2-equivocal breast cancers defined by the ASCO/CAP2013 recommendations and response to treatment. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p6-17-25] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
HER2 breast cancer status determines patients' eligibility for targeted therapy. HER2 level of amplification is associated with a better response to anti-HER2 therapy (Arnould CCR 2007, Singer CCR 2017). Benefit of anti-HER2 therapy for equivocal cases remains debated.
Objectives
We aimed to better characterize HER2-equivocal breast cancers by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) according to 2013 ASCO/CAP guidelines using PAM50 gene expression-based molecular subtyping. We then investigated genome-wide copy number alterations of HER2-equivocal cases, assessing agreement between genomic alterations of the chromosome (chr) 17 and molecular subtypes.
Methods
PAM50 (nCounter assay; Nanostring) was performed on RNA from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples of 40 HER2-equivocal cases. These cases were subsequently analyzed by Agilent 60-mer oligonucleotide microarrays for array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH).
Results
The 40 HER2-equivocal cases were classified as Luminal B in 16 cases (40%), HER2-Enriched in 14 cases (35%), Luminal A in 9 cases (22.5%) and Basal-like in 1 case (2.5%) using PAM50.
By IHC, 34 cases (85%) were ER+, 24 (60%) were also PgR+, 26 (65%) were grade III and 33 (82.5%) showed a high Ki67 > 20%.
Using aCGH, 10 cases (25%) presented chr 17q large copy number gain, 10 (25%) showed segmental copy number gains including HER2, 9 (22.5%) showed HER2 amplification, one (2.5%) showed a large copy number loss and 10 cases (25%) didn't show any copy number alteration of the chr 17.
Out of the 14 PAM50 HER2-Enriched cases, only 5 (35.7%) showed HER2 genomic amplification (Table 1). Four HER2 amplified cases at the genomic level were classified as Luminal B (3 cases, Ki67 > 20%, ER+, PgR- by IHC) or Luminal A (1 case, Ki67<20%, ER+, PgR>10% by IHC) using PAM50, although these luminal B tumors presented strong correlation with the HER2-Enriched centroid. In total, 13 cases (32.5%) were discordant between molecular classification and genomic alteration status of the chr 17.
Among patients with early stage HER2-equivocal breast cancers (n=37), 2 received neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (5.4%), 25 received adjuvant chemotherapy (67.6%) and 2 received adjuvant trastuzumab (5.4%). With a median follow up of 5.8 years (3.8-6.9), one controlateral recurrence (2.7%), four metastatic recurrences (10.8%) and three deaths were observed (8.1%).
Conclusion
Using PAM50, the majority of HER2-equivocal cases were classified as Luminal tumors.
At the genomic level, HER2-equivocal cases harbored mostly chr 17 segmental or large copy number gains. These results emphasized the need of HER2 status genomic determination. In line with the new ASCO 2018 recommendations intending to decrease the number of cases considered as HER2 equivocal, we showed that these tumors were mainly HER2 not amplified, ER positive and grade 3. There is no evidence of benefit of anti-HER2 therapy in these cases.
Table 1Genomic alterations of chromosome 17Basal-likeHER2-EnrichedLuminal ALuminal BTotalHER2 amplified05139Large copy number gain013610Segmental copy number gain153110No alteration032510Large copy number loss00011Total11491640
Citation Format: Borcoman E, Ngo C, Rapinat A, Simaga F, Mariani O, Fuhrmann L, Jeannot E, Laé M, Pierga J-Y, Gentien D, Pierron G, Morel P, Brauer HA, Vincent-Salomon A. PAM50 and CGH-array genomic characterization of HER2-equivocal breast cancers defined by the ASCO/CAP2013 recommendations and response to treatment [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-17-25.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Borcoman
- Institut Curie, Paris, Ile de France, France; Nanostring Technologies, Seattle, WA
| | - C Ngo
- Institut Curie, Paris, Ile de France, France; Nanostring Technologies, Seattle, WA
| | - A Rapinat
- Institut Curie, Paris, Ile de France, France; Nanostring Technologies, Seattle, WA
| | - F Simaga
- Institut Curie, Paris, Ile de France, France; Nanostring Technologies, Seattle, WA
| | - O Mariani
- Institut Curie, Paris, Ile de France, France; Nanostring Technologies, Seattle, WA
| | - L Fuhrmann
- Institut Curie, Paris, Ile de France, France; Nanostring Technologies, Seattle, WA
| | - E Jeannot
- Institut Curie, Paris, Ile de France, France; Nanostring Technologies, Seattle, WA
| | - M Laé
- Institut Curie, Paris, Ile de France, France; Nanostring Technologies, Seattle, WA
| | - J-Y Pierga
- Institut Curie, Paris, Ile de France, France; Nanostring Technologies, Seattle, WA
| | - D Gentien
- Institut Curie, Paris, Ile de France, France; Nanostring Technologies, Seattle, WA
| | - G Pierron
- Institut Curie, Paris, Ile de France, France; Nanostring Technologies, Seattle, WA
| | - P Morel
- Institut Curie, Paris, Ile de France, France; Nanostring Technologies, Seattle, WA
| | - HA Brauer
- Institut Curie, Paris, Ile de France, France; Nanostring Technologies, Seattle, WA
| | - A Vincent-Salomon
- Institut Curie, Paris, Ile de France, France; Nanostring Technologies, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Lefevre S, Lusque A, Joyon N, Arnould L, Penault-Llorca F, MacGrogan G, Treilleux I, Vincent-Salomon A, Haudebourg J, Maran-Gonzalez A, Charafe-Jauffret E, Courtinard C, Franchet C, Verriele V, Brain E, Tas P, Delaloge S, Filleron T, LaCroix-Triki M. Abstract P5-12-05: Phenotypic discordance between primary and metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in a large scale real-life multicentre French cohort. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p5-12-05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Therapeutic options at diagnosis for metastatic breast cancers (MBC) differ largely according to cancer phenotype (namely, hormone receptor (HR) and HER2 status). Reported discordance rates between primary tumor and metastasis vary widely in literature, with a median of 18% for estrogen receptor, 31% for progesterone receptor and 10% for HER2. The present study aimed to compare phenotypic profiles between primary and MBC in the real-life setting.
Patients (pts) and methods:
Epidemio-Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME)MBC data platform (NCT03275311) is a French national, multicenter, observational cohort using clinical trials' methodology for data capture, monitoring and quality controls. At the time of analysis, it comprised data of 16703 consecutive newly diagnosed MBC pts (1/01/08-31/12/14) treated in 18 French comprehensive cancer centres. The primary endpoint was the discordance rate of HR and HER2 status between primary tumor and MBC (biopsy of metastatic site done within 6 months of MBC diagnosis). Only patients with both histological reports available were considered. Potential factors associated with phenotype discordance were assessed in a multivariate logistic regression.
Results: 2933 out of 16703 (17.6%) had a biopsy in the first 6 months of metastatic disease. HR and/or HER2 status was available in 1677 pts. The discordance rate between primary and matched MBC was 14.2% (222/1566) for HR: loss of expression in 72.5%, gain in 27.5%. For HER2, the discordance rate was 7.8% (84/1076): 45.2% of losses and 54.8% of gains of expression. The primary HR+/HER2+ subgroup had the highest rate of changes: 53% (49/92) with either a loss of HR (43%), loss of HER2 (43%) or a loss of both (14%). 18% (33/181) of primary triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) had a phenotypic change with a majority of HR gain (79%). In multivariate analysis, administration of adjuvant chemotherapy +/- targeted therapy was the sole independent predictor of HR status modification (OR: 1.73, 95%CI 1.27-2.36, p=0.001). The presence of a mixed histology was the only predictor of HER2 discordance (OR =2.57, 95%CI 1.19-5.55, p=0.016).
Patient characteristics Total population (n=16703)Pts with primary and MBC phenotype available (n=1677)Age at metastatic diagnosis Median (range)61 (19-99)60 (24-93)De novo MBC4507 (27.1%)221 (13.2%)Number of metastatic sites Median (range)1 (1-9)2 (1-7)MBC sites Brain1200 (7.2%)138 (8.2%)Visceral7755 (46.4%)928 (55.3%)Non-visceral7748 (46.4%)611 (36.4%)Phenotypic profileN = 2933N=1677TNBC356 (18.5%)272 (19.3%)HR+/HER2-1251 (65.0%)917 (65.2%)HR-/HER2+150 (7.8%)105 (7.5%)HR+/HER2+168 (8.7%)112 (8%)Missing1008271Metastatic site samplingN=2933N=1677Bone692 (24.2%)419 (25.5%)Liver514 (18.0%)355 (21.6%)Skin379 (13.3%)203 (12.4%)Node306 (10.7%)169 (10.3%)Lung258 (9.0%)168 (10.2%)Pleura283 (9.9%)121 (7.4%)CNS/CSF*132 (4.6%)42 (2.6%)Other or multiple296 (10.3%)165 (10.0%)Missing7335* CNS= central nervous system, CSF=cerebro-spinal fluid
Conclusion: Biopsy and phenotype re-evaluation of MBC early in the disease course has a confirmed potential significant therapeutic impact in this large scale real life setting and should be proposed as often as possible.
Citation Format: Lefevre S, Lusque A, Joyon N, Arnould L, Penault-Llorca F, MacGrogan G, Treilleux I, Vincent-Salomon A, Haudebourg J, Maran-Gonzalez A, Charafe-Jauffret E, Courtinard C, Franchet C, Verriele V, Brain E, Tas P, Delaloge S, Filleron T, LaCroix-Triki M. Phenotypic discordance between primary and metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in a large scale real-life multicentre French cohort [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-12-05.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Lefevre
- Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Claudius Regaud, IUCT-Oncopôle, Toulouse, France; APHP - Hôpital Cochin - Service d'Anatomie et Cytologie Pathologiques, Paris, France; Centre GF Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Jean-Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Centre Lacassagne, Nice, France; ICM, Montpellier, France; Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France; Unicancer R&D, Paris, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; Atalante Pathologie, Rennes, France
| | - A Lusque
- Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Claudius Regaud, IUCT-Oncopôle, Toulouse, France; APHP - Hôpital Cochin - Service d'Anatomie et Cytologie Pathologiques, Paris, France; Centre GF Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Jean-Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Centre Lacassagne, Nice, France; ICM, Montpellier, France; Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France; Unicancer R&D, Paris, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; Atalante Pathologie, Rennes, France
| | - N Joyon
- Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Claudius Regaud, IUCT-Oncopôle, Toulouse, France; APHP - Hôpital Cochin - Service d'Anatomie et Cytologie Pathologiques, Paris, France; Centre GF Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Jean-Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Centre Lacassagne, Nice, France; ICM, Montpellier, France; Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France; Unicancer R&D, Paris, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; Atalante Pathologie, Rennes, France
| | - L Arnould
- Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Claudius Regaud, IUCT-Oncopôle, Toulouse, France; APHP - Hôpital Cochin - Service d'Anatomie et Cytologie Pathologiques, Paris, France; Centre GF Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Jean-Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Centre Lacassagne, Nice, France; ICM, Montpellier, France; Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France; Unicancer R&D, Paris, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; Atalante Pathologie, Rennes, France
| | - F Penault-Llorca
- Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Claudius Regaud, IUCT-Oncopôle, Toulouse, France; APHP - Hôpital Cochin - Service d'Anatomie et Cytologie Pathologiques, Paris, France; Centre GF Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Jean-Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Centre Lacassagne, Nice, France; ICM, Montpellier, France; Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France; Unicancer R&D, Paris, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; Atalante Pathologie, Rennes, France
| | - G MacGrogan
- Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Claudius Regaud, IUCT-Oncopôle, Toulouse, France; APHP - Hôpital Cochin - Service d'Anatomie et Cytologie Pathologiques, Paris, France; Centre GF Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Jean-Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Centre Lacassagne, Nice, France; ICM, Montpellier, France; Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France; Unicancer R&D, Paris, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; Atalante Pathologie, Rennes, France
| | - I Treilleux
- Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Claudius Regaud, IUCT-Oncopôle, Toulouse, France; APHP - Hôpital Cochin - Service d'Anatomie et Cytologie Pathologiques, Paris, France; Centre GF Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Jean-Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Centre Lacassagne, Nice, France; ICM, Montpellier, France; Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France; Unicancer R&D, Paris, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; Atalante Pathologie, Rennes, France
| | - A Vincent-Salomon
- Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Claudius Regaud, IUCT-Oncopôle, Toulouse, France; APHP - Hôpital Cochin - Service d'Anatomie et Cytologie Pathologiques, Paris, France; Centre GF Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Jean-Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Centre Lacassagne, Nice, France; ICM, Montpellier, France; Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France; Unicancer R&D, Paris, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; Atalante Pathologie, Rennes, France
| | - J Haudebourg
- Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Claudius Regaud, IUCT-Oncopôle, Toulouse, France; APHP - Hôpital Cochin - Service d'Anatomie et Cytologie Pathologiques, Paris, France; Centre GF Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Jean-Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Centre Lacassagne, Nice, France; ICM, Montpellier, France; Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France; Unicancer R&D, Paris, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; Atalante Pathologie, Rennes, France
| | - A Maran-Gonzalez
- Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Claudius Regaud, IUCT-Oncopôle, Toulouse, France; APHP - Hôpital Cochin - Service d'Anatomie et Cytologie Pathologiques, Paris, France; Centre GF Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Jean-Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Centre Lacassagne, Nice, France; ICM, Montpellier, France; Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France; Unicancer R&D, Paris, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; Atalante Pathologie, Rennes, France
| | - E Charafe-Jauffret
- Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Claudius Regaud, IUCT-Oncopôle, Toulouse, France; APHP - Hôpital Cochin - Service d'Anatomie et Cytologie Pathologiques, Paris, France; Centre GF Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Jean-Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Centre Lacassagne, Nice, France; ICM, Montpellier, France; Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France; Unicancer R&D, Paris, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; Atalante Pathologie, Rennes, France
| | - C Courtinard
- Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Claudius Regaud, IUCT-Oncopôle, Toulouse, France; APHP - Hôpital Cochin - Service d'Anatomie et Cytologie Pathologiques, Paris, France; Centre GF Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Jean-Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Centre Lacassagne, Nice, France; ICM, Montpellier, France; Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France; Unicancer R&D, Paris, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; Atalante Pathologie, Rennes, France
| | - C Franchet
- Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Claudius Regaud, IUCT-Oncopôle, Toulouse, France; APHP - Hôpital Cochin - Service d'Anatomie et Cytologie Pathologiques, Paris, France; Centre GF Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Jean-Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Centre Lacassagne, Nice, France; ICM, Montpellier, France; Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France; Unicancer R&D, Paris, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; Atalante Pathologie, Rennes, France
| | - V Verriele
- Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Claudius Regaud, IUCT-Oncopôle, Toulouse, France; APHP - Hôpital Cochin - Service d'Anatomie et Cytologie Pathologiques, Paris, France; Centre GF Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Jean-Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Centre Lacassagne, Nice, France; ICM, Montpellier, France; Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France; Unicancer R&D, Paris, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; Atalante Pathologie, Rennes, France
| | - E Brain
- Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Claudius Regaud, IUCT-Oncopôle, Toulouse, France; APHP - Hôpital Cochin - Service d'Anatomie et Cytologie Pathologiques, Paris, France; Centre GF Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Jean-Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Centre Lacassagne, Nice, France; ICM, Montpellier, France; Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France; Unicancer R&D, Paris, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; Atalante Pathologie, Rennes, France
| | - P Tas
- Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Claudius Regaud, IUCT-Oncopôle, Toulouse, France; APHP - Hôpital Cochin - Service d'Anatomie et Cytologie Pathologiques, Paris, France; Centre GF Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Jean-Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Centre Lacassagne, Nice, France; ICM, Montpellier, France; Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France; Unicancer R&D, Paris, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; Atalante Pathologie, Rennes, France
| | - S Delaloge
- Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Claudius Regaud, IUCT-Oncopôle, Toulouse, France; APHP - Hôpital Cochin - Service d'Anatomie et Cytologie Pathologiques, Paris, France; Centre GF Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Jean-Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Centre Lacassagne, Nice, France; ICM, Montpellier, France; Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France; Unicancer R&D, Paris, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; Atalante Pathologie, Rennes, France
| | - T Filleron
- Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Claudius Regaud, IUCT-Oncopôle, Toulouse, France; APHP - Hôpital Cochin - Service d'Anatomie et Cytologie Pathologiques, Paris, France; Centre GF Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Jean-Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Centre Lacassagne, Nice, France; ICM, Montpellier, France; Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France; Unicancer R&D, Paris, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; Atalante Pathologie, Rennes, France
| | - M LaCroix-Triki
- Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Institut Claudius Regaud, IUCT-Oncopôle, Toulouse, France; APHP - Hôpital Cochin - Service d'Anatomie et Cytologie Pathologiques, Paris, France; Centre GF Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Jean-Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Centre Lacassagne, Nice, France; ICM, Montpellier, France; Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France; Unicancer R&D, Paris, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; Atalante Pathologie, Rennes, France
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Vincent-Salomon A, Mathieu MC, Bataillon G, Arnould L, Verrièle V, Ghnassia JP, Haudebourg J, Penault-Llorca F, Lefebvre C, Maran-Gonzalez A, Guinebretière JM, Duprez R, Berghian A, Blanc-Fournier C, Calès V, Galant C, Delrée P, Lemonnier J, Delaloge S, Cottu PH. Abstract P4-15-02: TILs variations, proliferative response and PEPI scores in patients with luminal breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant letrozole-palbociclib or chemotherapy: An extended analysis of the NEOPAL trial. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p4-15-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The role of chemotherapy in early luminal breast cancer remains challenged. The NEOPAL trial (NCT 02400567; Cottu et al, ESMO 2017 LBA09) compared sequential chemotherapy (CT) and letrozole-palbociclib (LP) as neoadjuvant treatment in PAM50 defined high-risk luminal breast cancer patients, showing that LP might be as efficient as CT with regard to breast conserving surgery and pathological response. We report here extended exploratory pathological results, focusing on tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), proliferative response and preoperative endocrine prognostic index (PEPI) scores.
Material and Methods
Tumor blocks from baseline biopsy and surgical specimens were available for centralized review from the 106 randomized patients (53 in each arm). TILs quantification, KI67 staining and counting, and ER quantification were performed according to standard methods. Residual proliferative cancer burden (RPCB) and PEPI scores were computed according to published algorithms. Wilcoxon rank sum test and Mann Whitney test were used to compare paired and unpaired data. The chi-square and Fisher exact tests were used for categorical variables.
Results
Overall, median TILs count did not differ between LP and CT patients, both at baseline (p=0.37) and at the end of treatment (p=0.42). Median TILs count climbed from 5% (0-60) to 10% (1-60) in the LP arm (p=0.0026) and from 2% (0-30) to 10% (0-60) in the CT arm (p=0.0023). Median Ki67 dropped sharply in both arms, from 30% (1-80) to 1% (0-30) in the LP arm (p=1.10e-8) and from 30% (2-80) to 5% (0-30) in the CT arm (p=3.10e-9). Decrease in the Ki67 geometric mean was as sharp. Of note, while baseline Ki67 was similar in both arms (p=0.315), decrease in the LP arm was significantly more profound than in the CT arm (p=0.00075). Pathological response according to RPCB were as follows, in the LP and CT arm, respectively: class 0: 9.6%/10.2%; class I: 84.6%/73.5%; class II: 5.8%/16.3%. The relapse free survival PEPI scores were as follow in the LP and CT arm, respectively: class I: 13.5%/16.3%; class II: 59.6%/46.9%; class III: 28.9%/36.8% (p=0.504). Breast cancer specific survival PEPI scores were as follow in the LP and CT arm, respectively: class I: 18.9%/8.2%; class II: 54.7%/40.8%; class III: 26.4%/51%. These results were significantly better in the LP arm (p=0.027). There was no correlation between final TILs quantification and the RPCB or PEPI scores.
Conclusions
In this prospective multicenter study with centralized pathological review, neoadjuvant letrozole-palbociclib combination generates impressive proliferative and endocrine specific response features. It compared well with chemotherapy. The LP combination also significantly increased lymphocytic infiltration. Its clinical significance and utility remain to be elucidated, but it potentially adds new prognostic and theranostic information.
Citation Format: Vincent-Salomon A, Mathieu M-C, Bataillon G, Arnould L, Verrièle V, Ghnassia J-P, Haudebourg J, Penault-Llorca F, Lefebvre C, Maran-Gonzalez A, Guinebretière J-M, Duprez R, Berghian A, Blanc-Fournier C, Calès V, Galant C, Delrée P, Lemonnier J, Delaloge S, Cottu PH. TILs variations, proliferative response and PEPI scores in patients with luminal breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant letrozole-palbociclib or chemotherapy: An extended analysis of the NEOPAL trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-15-02.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Vincent-Salomon
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; PSL Research University, Paris, France; Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Centre George François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Hospitalier de Pau, Pau, France; Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Bruxelles, Belgium; Unicancer R&D, Kremlin Bicêtre, France; Institut de Pathologie et de Génétique, Charleroi, Belgium
| | - M-C Mathieu
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; PSL Research University, Paris, France; Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Centre George François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Hospitalier de Pau, Pau, France; Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Bruxelles, Belgium; Unicancer R&D, Kremlin Bicêtre, France; Institut de Pathologie et de Génétique, Charleroi, Belgium
| | - G Bataillon
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; PSL Research University, Paris, France; Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Centre George François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Hospitalier de Pau, Pau, France; Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Bruxelles, Belgium; Unicancer R&D, Kremlin Bicêtre, France; Institut de Pathologie et de Génétique, Charleroi, Belgium
| | - L Arnould
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; PSL Research University, Paris, France; Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Centre George François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Hospitalier de Pau, Pau, France; Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Bruxelles, Belgium; Unicancer R&D, Kremlin Bicêtre, France; Institut de Pathologie et de Génétique, Charleroi, Belgium
| | - V Verrièle
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; PSL Research University, Paris, France; Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Centre George François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Hospitalier de Pau, Pau, France; Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Bruxelles, Belgium; Unicancer R&D, Kremlin Bicêtre, France; Institut de Pathologie et de Génétique, Charleroi, Belgium
| | - J-P Ghnassia
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; PSL Research University, Paris, France; Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Centre George François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Hospitalier de Pau, Pau, France; Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Bruxelles, Belgium; Unicancer R&D, Kremlin Bicêtre, France; Institut de Pathologie et de Génétique, Charleroi, Belgium
| | - J Haudebourg
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; PSL Research University, Paris, France; Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Centre George François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Hospitalier de Pau, Pau, France; Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Bruxelles, Belgium; Unicancer R&D, Kremlin Bicêtre, France; Institut de Pathologie et de Génétique, Charleroi, Belgium
| | - F Penault-Llorca
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; PSL Research University, Paris, France; Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Centre George François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Hospitalier de Pau, Pau, France; Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Bruxelles, Belgium; Unicancer R&D, Kremlin Bicêtre, France; Institut de Pathologie et de Génétique, Charleroi, Belgium
| | - C Lefebvre
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; PSL Research University, Paris, France; Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Centre George François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Hospitalier de Pau, Pau, France; Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Bruxelles, Belgium; Unicancer R&D, Kremlin Bicêtre, France; Institut de Pathologie et de Génétique, Charleroi, Belgium
| | - A Maran-Gonzalez
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; PSL Research University, Paris, France; Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Centre George François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Hospitalier de Pau, Pau, France; Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Bruxelles, Belgium; Unicancer R&D, Kremlin Bicêtre, France; Institut de Pathologie et de Génétique, Charleroi, Belgium
| | - J-M Guinebretière
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; PSL Research University, Paris, France; Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Centre George François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Hospitalier de Pau, Pau, France; Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Bruxelles, Belgium; Unicancer R&D, Kremlin Bicêtre, France; Institut de Pathologie et de Génétique, Charleroi, Belgium
| | - R Duprez
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; PSL Research University, Paris, France; Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Centre George François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Hospitalier de Pau, Pau, France; Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Bruxelles, Belgium; Unicancer R&D, Kremlin Bicêtre, France; Institut de Pathologie et de Génétique, Charleroi, Belgium
| | - A Berghian
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; PSL Research University, Paris, France; Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Centre George François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Hospitalier de Pau, Pau, France; Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Bruxelles, Belgium; Unicancer R&D, Kremlin Bicêtre, France; Institut de Pathologie et de Génétique, Charleroi, Belgium
| | - C Blanc-Fournier
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; PSL Research University, Paris, France; Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Centre George François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Hospitalier de Pau, Pau, France; Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Bruxelles, Belgium; Unicancer R&D, Kremlin Bicêtre, France; Institut de Pathologie et de Génétique, Charleroi, Belgium
| | - V Calès
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; PSL Research University, Paris, France; Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Centre George François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Hospitalier de Pau, Pau, France; Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Bruxelles, Belgium; Unicancer R&D, Kremlin Bicêtre, France; Institut de Pathologie et de Génétique, Charleroi, Belgium
| | - C Galant
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; PSL Research University, Paris, France; Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Centre George François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Hospitalier de Pau, Pau, France; Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Bruxelles, Belgium; Unicancer R&D, Kremlin Bicêtre, France; Institut de Pathologie et de Génétique, Charleroi, Belgium
| | - P Delrée
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; PSL Research University, Paris, France; Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Centre George François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Hospitalier de Pau, Pau, France; Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Bruxelles, Belgium; Unicancer R&D, Kremlin Bicêtre, France; Institut de Pathologie et de Génétique, Charleroi, Belgium
| | - J Lemonnier
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; PSL Research University, Paris, France; Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Centre George François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Hospitalier de Pau, Pau, France; Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Bruxelles, Belgium; Unicancer R&D, Kremlin Bicêtre, France; Institut de Pathologie et de Génétique, Charleroi, Belgium
| | - S Delaloge
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; PSL Research University, Paris, France; Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Centre George François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Hospitalier de Pau, Pau, France; Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Bruxelles, Belgium; Unicancer R&D, Kremlin Bicêtre, France; Institut de Pathologie et de Génétique, Charleroi, Belgium
| | - PH Cottu
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; PSL Research University, Paris, France; Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Centre George François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France; Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France; Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Hospitalier de Pau, Pau, France; Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Bruxelles, Belgium; Unicancer R&D, Kremlin Bicêtre, France; Institut de Pathologie et de Génétique, Charleroi, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Tran M, Loirat D, Colas C, Bozec L, Laurence V, Lerebours F, Cabel L, Bidard FC, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Vincent-Salomon A, Gauthier-Villars M, Lavigne M, De Pauw A. Abstract P1-09-07: Breast cancer characteristics and outcomes in patients with TP53 germline mutation. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p1-09-07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) resulting from monoallelic germline TP53 gene mutation is a rare hereditary cancer predisposition. Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer among women with TP53 germline mutation with a risk ranging from 49% to 85% by the age of 60 years old. Most of these cancers are early onset. Few patients' cases have been reported so far in the literature. Our aim was to describe the medical history of a cohort of LFS women diagnosed with BC recruited from a single institution. The characteristics combined were genetic alteration diagnosis, tumor characteristics, treatment, outcome, and LFS associated cancers.
Methods
We retrospectively identified breast cancer patients with TP53 germline mutation from the Institut Curie (Paris, France) database and described their cancer characteristics and medical history.
Results
From 1989 to 2015, 25 patients affected with BC (31 tumors) and TP53 germline mutation carrier were identified, with a median follow up of 6.5 years. Median age at BC diagnosis was 30.5 years. All patients were women. 33% had a previously identified TP53 mutation in their family. 70% of them had BC as their first cancer event. 60% of the patients presented with another LFS associated cancer or non-related cancers: osteosarcoma (22%), glioblastoma (18%), pulmonary carcinoma (13%), gastric linitis plastica (9%), malignant hemopathy (9%), soft tissue sarcoma (9%), adrenocortical carcinoma (4%), ovarian cystadenocarcinoma (4%), renal tumor (4%), choroid plexus carcinoma (4%).
92% of the breast tumors were ductal carcinoma (28% DCIS and 64% IDC), 7% were sarcoma (1 phyllodesarcoma, 1 pleiomorphic liposarcoma); there were no lobular carcinoma. Among the IDC, 50% were HER2 positive, 72% were hormone-receptor positive.
Most patients had a mastectomy (64%), and most of them received radiation (55%). However, when TP53 mutation had been identified prior to the treatment, none of the patients received radiotherapy (5 patients). Most patients received chemotherapy (70%) (37% in neoadjuvant setting, 33% in adjuvant setting, 25% for metastatic setting). 40% of the patients received hormone therapy (37% as adjuvant treatment, 7% for metastatic disease)
Most of the patients did not relapse from BC (75%). Overall, only 17% of the patients had metastatic BC. To date, 12 patients of our series have died (48%), 6 patients (24%) from other LFS-associated cancers and 4 patients from BC (16%).
Conclusion
To the best of our knowledge, this descriptive series is the largest study of tumor characteristics and medical history of LFS-women with BC, the most frequent cancer among women with TP53 germline mutation. It confirms the higher HER2 overexpression rate observed in LFS-patients BC, as suggested in the literature and showed a high rate of DCIS at initial presentation. Most of the patients developed other LFS-associated cancers. In depth molecular analysis of these BC will be performed in order to gain insight into their biological specificities and to adapt the therapeutic management of this poor prognosis syndrome.
Citation Format: Tran M, Loirat D, Colas C, Bozec L, Laurence V, Lerebours F, Cabel L, Bidard F-C, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Vincent-Salomon A, Gauthier-Villars M, Lavigne M, De Pauw A. Breast cancer characteristics and outcomes in patients with TP53 germline mutation [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-09-07.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Tran
- Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | | | - C Colas
- Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - L Bozec
- Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | | | | | - L Cabel
- Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Bernard-Tessier A, Jeannot E, Guenat D, Michel M, Proudhon C, Vincent-Salomon A, Bièche I, Pierga JY, Buecher B, Francois E, Kim S, André T, Jary M, Vendrely V, Samalin E, El Hajbi F, Baba-Hamed N, Meurisse A, Bidard FC, Borg C. HPV circulating tumor DNA as predictive biomarker of sustained response to chemotherapy in advanced anal carcinoma. Ann Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy269.092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
28
|
Hamy AS, Pierga JY, Sabaila A, Laas E, Bonsang-Kitzis H, Laurent C, Vincent-Salomon A, Cottu P, Lerebours F, Rouzier R, Lae M, Reyal F. Stromal lymphocyte infiltration after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with aggressive residual disease and lower disease-free survival in HER2-positive breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2018; 28:2233-2240. [PMID: 28911063 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The role of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in breast cancer has been extensively studied over the last decade. High TILs levels have been associated with pathological response rate in the neoadjuvant setting and with better outcomes in the adjuvant setting. However, little attention has been paid to changes in TILs and residual TIL levels after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). We investigated TIL levels before, after chemotherapy, and their dynamics during treatment; and we assessed the correlation of these levels with response to NAC and prognosis. Materials and methods We identified 175 patients with primary HER2-positive breast cancers receiving NAC+/- trastuzumab between 2002 and 2011. Microbiopsy specimens and paired surgical samples were evaluated for stromal lymphocyte infiltration. Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out to assess the association of clinical and pathological factors with pathological complete response (pCR) and disease-free survival. Results Baseline TIL levels were not significantly associated with pCR. TIL levels decreased during treatment in 78% of the patients. The magnitude of the decrease was strongly associated with pCR. After chemotherapy, TIL levels were high in tumors displaying aggressive patterns (high residual cancer burden score, mitotic index >22, tumor cellularity >5%). In the population with residual disease, TIL levels >25% at the end of NAC were significantly associated with an adverse outcome (TILs >25%, HR = 7.98, P = 0.009) after multivariate analyses including BMI, post-NAC mitotic index and tumor grade. Conclusion A decrease in TIL levels during chemotherapy was positively associated with response to treatment. In tumor failing to achieve pCR, post-NAC lymphocytic infiltration was associated with higher residual tumor burden and adverse clinical outcome. Further studies are required to characterize immune infiltration in residual disease to identify candidates who could benefit from second-line therapy trials including immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A-S Hamy
- Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, Translational Research Department, PSL Research University, Institut Curie, Paris.,INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Paris
| | - J-Y Pierga
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris.,Faculty of Medicine, Paris Descartes University, Paris
| | - A Sabaila
- Departments of Surgery, Institut Curie, Paris
| | - E Laas
- Departments of Surgery, Institut Curie, Paris
| | - H Bonsang-Kitzis
- Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, Translational Research Department, PSL Research University, Institut Curie, Paris.,INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Paris.,Departments of Surgery, Institut Curie, Paris
| | - C Laurent
- Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, Translational Research Department, PSL Research University, Institut Curie, Paris.,INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Paris
| | | | - P Cottu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris
| | - F Lerebours
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris
| | - R Rouzier
- Departments of Surgery, Institut Curie, Paris.,Equipe d'Accueil 7285, Risk and Safety in Clinical Medicine for Women and Perinatal Health, University Versailles-Saint-Quentin, 2 av de la source de la Biévre, 78180 Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France
| | - M Lae
- Department of Pathology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - F Reyal
- Residual Tumor & Response to Treatment Laboratory, RT2Lab, Translational Research Department, PSL Research University, Institut Curie, Paris.,INSERM, U932 Immunity and Cancer, Paris.,Departments of Surgery, Institut Curie, Paris
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Ngo C, Borcoman E, Simaga F, Mariani O, Fuhrmann L, Jeannot E, Loirat D, Lae M, Pierga JY, Pierron G, Vincent-Salomon A. Abstract P2-05-11: Not presented. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-p2-05-11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
This abstract was not presented at the symposium.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Ngo
- Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - M Lae
- Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Pareja F, Geyer FC, Piscuoglio S, Selenica P, Kumar R, Lim RS, Guerini-Rocco E, Marchio C, Mariani O, Ng CKY, Brogi E, Norton L, Vincent-Salomon A, Weigelt B, Reis-Filho JS. Abstract P2-05-08: Mucinous breast carcinomas: A genomically distinct subtype of estrogen receptor-positive invasive breast cancers. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-p2-05-08] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: Mucinous carcinoma of the breast (MCB) is a rare histologic form of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive invasive carcinoma, accounting for up to 2% of breast cancers. MCBs are characterized by clusters of tumor cells floating in lakes of extracellular mucin, and are classified into mucinous A (paucicellular) and mucinous B (hypercellular) subtypes. Some MCBs are found admixed with invasive ductal carcinoma components, and then classified as mixed MCBs. The aims of this study were to determine the repertoire of somatic mutations of MCBs and to ascertain whether these genetic alterations are distinct from those identified in common forms of ER+/HER2- invasive breast cancers (IBCs). We also sought to determine whether the mucinous and ductal components of mixed MCBs would be clonally related.
Materials and methods: Thirty MCBs including 25 pure MCBs (n=13 mucinous A, n=12 mucinous B) and five mixed MCBs were microdissected and subjected to whole exome sequencing. Each tumor component of mixed cases was microdissected and analyzed separately. Somatic mutations, copy number alterations and mutational signatures were defined using state-of-the-art bioinformatics methods. The mutational repertoire of MCBs was compared with that of ER+/HER2- IBCs (n = 240) from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) breast cancer study.
Results: The genes most frequently mutated in MCBs were GATA3 (27%, 8/30, all frameshift mutations), KMT2C (13%, 4/30) and MAP3K1 (10%, 3/30). No significant differences were identified in single gene comparisons between mucinous A and mucinous B MCBs or between pure MCBs and the mucinous component of mixed MCBs (Fisher's exact tests, p>0.05). As compared to common forms of ER+/HER2- IBC, MCBs had a lower frequency of PIK3CA mutations (7% vs 42%, p<0.001) and a higher frequency of GATA3 mutations (27% vs 12%, p=0.04). Mucinous B MCBs had a higher frequency of KMT2C mutations than ER+/HER2- IBCs (25% vs 6%, p=0.04). Most MCBs displayed the mutational signature 1 (aging-related; 20/30, 67%), and no differences in the frequency of specific mutational signatures according to the type of MCBs were observed. Concurrent 1q gains and 16q losses, which are the hallmark genetic alterations of low-grade ER+/HER2- breast cancers, were not observed in pure MCBs, but were found in three of the five mixed MCBs analyzed. The mucinous and ductal components of all five mixed MCBs shared a median of 58% of somatic mutations (range 42%-64%), including clonal GATA3 frameshift mutations in two of them, as well as a similar pattern of copy number alterations, supporting their clonal relatedness. Additional somatic mutations found to be restricted to the ductal or mucinous components of all mixed MCBs analyzed were identified, including clonal missense mutations in PIK3C2B and PIK3R2 in the ductal component of one case, and a PIK3R5 missense mutation in the mucinous component of another case.
Conclusions: The repertoire of somatic mutations in MCBs is distinct from that of common forms of ER+/HER2- IBCs. These differences include the lack of concurrent 1q gains/16q losses, a lower frequency of PIK3CA mutations and a higher frequency of GATA3 mutations in pure MCBs.
Citation Format: Pareja F, Geyer FC, Piscuoglio S, Selenica P, Kumar R, Lim RS, Guerini-Rocco E, Marchio C, Mariani O, Ng CKY, Brogi E, Norton L, Vincent-Salomon A, Weigelt B, Reis-Filho JS. Mucinous breast carcinomas: A genomically distinct subtype of estrogen receptor-positive invasive breast cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-05-08.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Pareja
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Instiut Curie, Paris, France
| | - FC Geyer
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Instiut Curie, Paris, France
| | - S Piscuoglio
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Instiut Curie, Paris, France
| | - P Selenica
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Instiut Curie, Paris, France
| | - R Kumar
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Instiut Curie, Paris, France
| | - RS Lim
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Instiut Curie, Paris, France
| | - E Guerini-Rocco
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Instiut Curie, Paris, France
| | - C Marchio
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Instiut Curie, Paris, France
| | - O Mariani
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Instiut Curie, Paris, France
| | - CKY Ng
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Instiut Curie, Paris, France
| | - E Brogi
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Instiut Curie, Paris, France
| | - L Norton
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Instiut Curie, Paris, France
| | - A Vincent-Salomon
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Instiut Curie, Paris, France
| | - B Weigelt
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Instiut Curie, Paris, France
| | - JS Reis-Filho
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; University of Turin, Turin, Italy; Instiut Curie, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Kim J, Geyer FC, Martelotto LG, Ng CKY, Lim RS, Selenica P, Li A, Pareja F, Fusco N, Edelweiss M, Mariani O, Badve S, Vincent-Salomon A, Norton L, Reis-Filho JS, Weigelt B. Abstract P2-05-03: Novel driver genetic alterations in MYB-NFIB-negative breast adenoid cystic carcinomas. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-p2-05-03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: Breast adenoid cystic carcinoma (AdCC) is a rare type of triple-negative breast cancer associated with an indolent clinical behavior. AdCCs provide a clear example of genotypic-phenotypic correlation with the majority harboring the MYB-NFIB fusion gene. In this study, we sought to identify alternative driver genetic alterations in breast AdCCs lacking the MYB-NFIB fusion gene.
Methods: Nucleic acids obtained from four breast AdCCs lacking the MYB-NFIB fusion gene as defined by reverse transcription (RT)-PCR and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) were subjected to RNA-sequencing (n=3), whole-genome (n=2) and/or targeted (n=1) massively parallel sequencing. Sequencing data were analyzed using state-of-the-art bioinformatics algorithms, and potential alternative driver genetic alterations were validated using orthogonal sequencing and molecular pathology methods.
Results: RNA-sequencing revealed the presence of MYBL1-ACTN1 or MYBL1-NFIB fusion genes in two breast AdCCs, which were validated by whole-genome sequencing and/or MYBL1 FISH analysis. Both MYBL1 fusion gene-positive cases were found to overexpress MYBL1 as defined by quantitative RT-PCR analysis. In the third MYB-NFIB-negative breast AdCC studied, a high-level MYB gene amplification coupled with overexpression of MYB at the mRNA and protein levels was identified. In the fourth breast AdCC, which expressed high levels of MYB, whole-genome and RNA-sequencing revealed no definite alternative driver alteration, however, a MYBL2 intronic mutation was found in this case, which was associated with high levels of MYBL2 mRNA expression. In this case, single sample gene set enrichment analysis revealed activation of pathways similar to those activated in AdCCs harboring the MYB-NFIB or MYBL1 fusions genes.
Conclusion: We demonstrate that in breast AdCCs lacking the MYB-NFIB fusion gene MYBL1 rearrangements and MYB amplification are likely alternative driver genetic events. Given that activation of MYB/MYBL1 and their downstream targets can be driven by the MYB-NFIB fusion gene, MYBL1 rearrangements, MYB amplification or other yet to be validated mechanisms (e.g. MYBL2 non-coding mutations), our findings further suggest that breast AdCCs constitute a convergent phenotype.
Citation Format: Kim J, Geyer FC, Martelotto LG, Ng CKY, Lim RS, Selenica P, Li A, Pareja F, Fusco N, Edelweiss M, Mariani O, Badve S, Vincent-Salomon A, Norton L, Reis-Filho JS, Weigelt B. Novel driver genetic alterations in MYB-NFIB-negative breast adenoid cystic carcinomas [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-05-03.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Kim
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Institut Curie, Paris, France; IU Health Pathology Laboratory, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN
| | - FC Geyer
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Institut Curie, Paris, France; IU Health Pathology Laboratory, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN
| | - LG Martelotto
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Institut Curie, Paris, France; IU Health Pathology Laboratory, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN
| | - CKY Ng
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Institut Curie, Paris, France; IU Health Pathology Laboratory, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN
| | - RS Lim
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Institut Curie, Paris, France; IU Health Pathology Laboratory, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN
| | - P Selenica
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Institut Curie, Paris, France; IU Health Pathology Laboratory, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN
| | - A Li
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Institut Curie, Paris, France; IU Health Pathology Laboratory, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN
| | - F Pareja
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Institut Curie, Paris, France; IU Health Pathology Laboratory, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN
| | - N Fusco
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Institut Curie, Paris, France; IU Health Pathology Laboratory, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN
| | - M Edelweiss
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Institut Curie, Paris, France; IU Health Pathology Laboratory, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN
| | - O Mariani
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Institut Curie, Paris, France; IU Health Pathology Laboratory, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN
| | - S Badve
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Institut Curie, Paris, France; IU Health Pathology Laboratory, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN
| | - A Vincent-Salomon
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Institut Curie, Paris, France; IU Health Pathology Laboratory, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN
| | - L Norton
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Institut Curie, Paris, France; IU Health Pathology Laboratory, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN
| | - JS Reis-Filho
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Institut Curie, Paris, France; IU Health Pathology Laboratory, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN
| | - B Weigelt
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Institut Curie, Paris, France; IU Health Pathology Laboratory, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Bidard FC, Mignot F, Poortmans P, Dureau S, Berger F, Loirat D, Proudhon C, Vincent-Salomon A, Pierga JY, Kirova Y. Abstract P4-09-02: Disseminated tumor cells as predictive factor of benefit of lymph node irradiation to prevent loco-regional relapse. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-p4-09-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background:
Early stage breast cancer patients with micrometastatic spread (cM0(i+) per the 2010 TNM staging), detected either in the bone marrow (disseminated tumor cells, DTC) or in the blood (circulating tumor cells, CTC) are at higher risk of distant relapse and death. Loco-regional relapses were also more frequently observed in patients with DTC and, recently, with CTC (IMENEO study, Bidard et al, SABCS 2016). In that context, we analyzed whether DTC detection would be a predictive factor for the benefit of comprehensive loco-regional irradiation.
Methods:
Patients with localized breast cancer were eligible for this IRB-approved prospective cohort after informed written consent. DTC status was prospectively assessed by trained pathologists after immunocytostaining following ISHAGE criteria, at time of surgery or prior to any primary systemic therapy. Irradiation volumes (breast or chest wall +/- regional lymph nodes) were defined per standard of care. Locoregional relapse was defined as documented ipsilateral invasive relapse occurring in the breast, chest wall and/or in regional lymph nodes, prior to any distant metastatic relapse. Locoregional relapse-free interval (LRFI) was defined as the time elapsed between breast surgery and locoregional relapse. Cumulative incidence rates and hazard ratio were obtained using both Cox and Fine-Gray models, taking into account metastatic relapse and death as competitive events. Interaction tests were performed to confirm the predictive value of DTC status in a multivariate analysis.
Results:
From 11.1998 to 09.2005, a total of 620 patients with non-metastatic breast cancer were included in this prospective cohort. Median FU was 11.7 years. Overall, 94 patients (15.1%) were DTC-positive and 50 patients (8.1%) experienced a locoregional relapse during follow-up. DTC detection was significantly associated with shorter LRFI in univariate and multivariate analyses (Cox, HR=2.6 [1.4;4.8], p=0.004 ; Fine-Gray, HR=1.76 [1.04;3.0], p=0.04). In the multivariate subgroup analysis, locoregional lymph node irradiation was associated with a longer LRFI for DTC-positive patients, but not for DTC-negative patients (interaction test in multivariate analysis: p=0.03). Similar results were obtained when taking locoregional relapses synchronous with distant metastatic disease into account (interaction test: p=0.02). Importantly, the predictive value of DTC status for the benefit of locoregional irradiation was independent of other clinical and pathological characteristics, including locoregional nodal (pN) status.
Conclusion:
This long term analysis confirms the independent long-term prognostic value of DTC on locoregional relapses. Moreover, the finding that cM0(i+) status is a predictive marker for the efficacy of locoregional lymph node irradiation promises a new opportunity to better tailor adjuvant radiation therapy in early stage breast cancer patients.
Citation Format: Bidard F-C, Mignot F, Poortmans P, Dureau S, Berger F, Loirat D, Proudhon C, Vincent-Salomon A, Pierga J-Y, Kirova Y. Disseminated tumor cells as predictive factor of benefit of lymph node irradiation to prevent loco-regional relapse [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-09-02.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F-C Bidard
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Versailles Saint Quentin University, Paris Saclay University, Saint Cloud, France; Paris Descartes University, Sorbonne Paris Cite University, Paris, France
| | - F Mignot
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Versailles Saint Quentin University, Paris Saclay University, Saint Cloud, France; Paris Descartes University, Sorbonne Paris Cite University, Paris, France
| | - P Poortmans
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Versailles Saint Quentin University, Paris Saclay University, Saint Cloud, France; Paris Descartes University, Sorbonne Paris Cite University, Paris, France
| | - S Dureau
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Versailles Saint Quentin University, Paris Saclay University, Saint Cloud, France; Paris Descartes University, Sorbonne Paris Cite University, Paris, France
| | - F Berger
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Versailles Saint Quentin University, Paris Saclay University, Saint Cloud, France; Paris Descartes University, Sorbonne Paris Cite University, Paris, France
| | - D Loirat
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Versailles Saint Quentin University, Paris Saclay University, Saint Cloud, France; Paris Descartes University, Sorbonne Paris Cite University, Paris, France
| | - C Proudhon
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Versailles Saint Quentin University, Paris Saclay University, Saint Cloud, France; Paris Descartes University, Sorbonne Paris Cite University, Paris, France
| | - A Vincent-Salomon
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Versailles Saint Quentin University, Paris Saclay University, Saint Cloud, France; Paris Descartes University, Sorbonne Paris Cite University, Paris, France
| | - J-Y Pierga
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Versailles Saint Quentin University, Paris Saclay University, Saint Cloud, France; Paris Descartes University, Sorbonne Paris Cite University, Paris, France
| | - Y Kirova
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Versailles Saint Quentin University, Paris Saclay University, Saint Cloud, France; Paris Descartes University, Sorbonne Paris Cite University, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Cottu PH, D'Hondt V, Dureau S, Lerebours F, Desmoulins I, Heudel P, Duhouix F, Levy C, Mouret-Reynier MA, Dalenc F, Frenel JS, Jouannaud C, Venat-Bouvet L, Nguyen S, Ferrero JM, Canon JL, Grenier J, Vincent-Salomon A, Lemonnier J, Delaloge S. Abstract P3-13-02: Withdrawn. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-p3-13-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
This abstract was withdrawn by the authors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- PH Cottu
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut de Cancérologie de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Centre Gerorges François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Cliniques Saint-Luc, Louvain, Belgium; Centre Fraçois Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint-Herblin - Angers, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Limoges University Hospital, Limoges, France; Pau Hospital, Pau, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Grand Hôpital de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; R & D Unicancer, UCBG, Paris, France; Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - V D'Hondt
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut de Cancérologie de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Centre Gerorges François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Cliniques Saint-Luc, Louvain, Belgium; Centre Fraçois Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint-Herblin - Angers, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Limoges University Hospital, Limoges, France; Pau Hospital, Pau, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Grand Hôpital de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; R & D Unicancer, UCBG, Paris, France; Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - S Dureau
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut de Cancérologie de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Centre Gerorges François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Cliniques Saint-Luc, Louvain, Belgium; Centre Fraçois Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint-Herblin - Angers, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Limoges University Hospital, Limoges, France; Pau Hospital, Pau, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Grand Hôpital de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; R & D Unicancer, UCBG, Paris, France; Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - F Lerebours
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut de Cancérologie de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Centre Gerorges François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Cliniques Saint-Luc, Louvain, Belgium; Centre Fraçois Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint-Herblin - Angers, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Limoges University Hospital, Limoges, France; Pau Hospital, Pau, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Grand Hôpital de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; R & D Unicancer, UCBG, Paris, France; Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - I Desmoulins
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut de Cancérologie de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Centre Gerorges François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Cliniques Saint-Luc, Louvain, Belgium; Centre Fraçois Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint-Herblin - Angers, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Limoges University Hospital, Limoges, France; Pau Hospital, Pau, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Grand Hôpital de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; R & D Unicancer, UCBG, Paris, France; Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - P Heudel
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut de Cancérologie de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Centre Gerorges François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Cliniques Saint-Luc, Louvain, Belgium; Centre Fraçois Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint-Herblin - Angers, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Limoges University Hospital, Limoges, France; Pau Hospital, Pau, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Grand Hôpital de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; R & D Unicancer, UCBG, Paris, France; Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - F Duhouix
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut de Cancérologie de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Centre Gerorges François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Cliniques Saint-Luc, Louvain, Belgium; Centre Fraçois Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint-Herblin - Angers, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Limoges University Hospital, Limoges, France; Pau Hospital, Pau, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Grand Hôpital de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; R & D Unicancer, UCBG, Paris, France; Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - C Levy
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut de Cancérologie de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Centre Gerorges François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Cliniques Saint-Luc, Louvain, Belgium; Centre Fraçois Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint-Herblin - Angers, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Limoges University Hospital, Limoges, France; Pau Hospital, Pau, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Grand Hôpital de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; R & D Unicancer, UCBG, Paris, France; Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - M-A Mouret-Reynier
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut de Cancérologie de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Centre Gerorges François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Cliniques Saint-Luc, Louvain, Belgium; Centre Fraçois Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint-Herblin - Angers, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Limoges University Hospital, Limoges, France; Pau Hospital, Pau, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Grand Hôpital de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; R & D Unicancer, UCBG, Paris, France; Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - F Dalenc
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut de Cancérologie de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Centre Gerorges François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Cliniques Saint-Luc, Louvain, Belgium; Centre Fraçois Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint-Herblin - Angers, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Limoges University Hospital, Limoges, France; Pau Hospital, Pau, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Grand Hôpital de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; R & D Unicancer, UCBG, Paris, France; Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - J-S Frenel
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut de Cancérologie de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Centre Gerorges François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Cliniques Saint-Luc, Louvain, Belgium; Centre Fraçois Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint-Herblin - Angers, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Limoges University Hospital, Limoges, France; Pau Hospital, Pau, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Grand Hôpital de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; R & D Unicancer, UCBG, Paris, France; Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - C Jouannaud
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut de Cancérologie de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Centre Gerorges François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Cliniques Saint-Luc, Louvain, Belgium; Centre Fraçois Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint-Herblin - Angers, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Limoges University Hospital, Limoges, France; Pau Hospital, Pau, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Grand Hôpital de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; R & D Unicancer, UCBG, Paris, France; Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - L Venat-Bouvet
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut de Cancérologie de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Centre Gerorges François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Cliniques Saint-Luc, Louvain, Belgium; Centre Fraçois Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint-Herblin - Angers, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Limoges University Hospital, Limoges, France; Pau Hospital, Pau, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Grand Hôpital de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; R & D Unicancer, UCBG, Paris, France; Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - S Nguyen
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut de Cancérologie de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Centre Gerorges François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Cliniques Saint-Luc, Louvain, Belgium; Centre Fraçois Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint-Herblin - Angers, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Limoges University Hospital, Limoges, France; Pau Hospital, Pau, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Grand Hôpital de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; R & D Unicancer, UCBG, Paris, France; Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - J-M Ferrero
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut de Cancérologie de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Centre Gerorges François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Cliniques Saint-Luc, Louvain, Belgium; Centre Fraçois Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint-Herblin - Angers, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Limoges University Hospital, Limoges, France; Pau Hospital, Pau, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Grand Hôpital de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; R & D Unicancer, UCBG, Paris, France; Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - J-L Canon
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut de Cancérologie de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Centre Gerorges François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Cliniques Saint-Luc, Louvain, Belgium; Centre Fraçois Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint-Herblin - Angers, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Limoges University Hospital, Limoges, France; Pau Hospital, Pau, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Grand Hôpital de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; R & D Unicancer, UCBG, Paris, France; Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - J Grenier
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut de Cancérologie de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Centre Gerorges François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Cliniques Saint-Luc, Louvain, Belgium; Centre Fraçois Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint-Herblin - Angers, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Limoges University Hospital, Limoges, France; Pau Hospital, Pau, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Grand Hôpital de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; R & D Unicancer, UCBG, Paris, France; Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - A Vincent-Salomon
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut de Cancérologie de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Centre Gerorges François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Cliniques Saint-Luc, Louvain, Belgium; Centre Fraçois Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint-Herblin - Angers, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Limoges University Hospital, Limoges, France; Pau Hospital, Pau, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Grand Hôpital de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; R & D Unicancer, UCBG, Paris, France; Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - J Lemonnier
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut de Cancérologie de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Centre Gerorges François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Cliniques Saint-Luc, Louvain, Belgium; Centre Fraçois Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint-Herblin - Angers, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Limoges University Hospital, Limoges, France; Pau Hospital, Pau, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Grand Hôpital de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; R & D Unicancer, UCBG, Paris, France; Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| | - S Delaloge
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut de Cancérologie de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Centre Gerorges François Leclerc, Dijon, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; Cliniques Saint-Luc, Louvain, Belgium; Centre Fraçois Baclesse, Caen, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont Ferrand, France; Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint-Herblin - Angers, France; Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France; Limoges University Hospital, Limoges, France; Pau Hospital, Pau, France; Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France; Grand Hôpital de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium; Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France; R & D Unicancer, UCBG, Paris, France; Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Hamy-Petit AS, Lam GT, Laas E, Darrigues L, Balezeau T, Guerin J, Livartowski A, Sadacca B, Pierga JY, Vincent-Salomon A, Bidard FC, Lerebours F, Brain E, Becette V, Rouzier R, Lae M, Reyal F. Abstract P2-03-04: Lymphovascular invasion in breast carcinoma following neodjuvant chemotherapy is a strong prognosis factor. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-p2-03-04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose : Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is a poor prognosis factor in breast cancer (BC), but data on its value in the neoadjuvant setting is scarce. This study evaluates the relationships between post-NAC LVI and prognosis in BC.
Methods: We identified 1197 patients with primary BC receiving NAC +/- trastuzumab between 2002 and 2011. Information on LVI in post-NAC surgical specimen was retrieved from review of medical charts. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the association of clinical, pathological factors with disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was assessed using a cox proportional hazard model.
Results: On 1197 tumors, 528 were luminal (44.1%), 375 were triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) (31.3%) and 294 were HER2-positive (24.6%). On post-NAC surgical specimens, LVI was present in 302 (25.2%), absent in 531 (44.4%), and was not mentionned in 364 cases (30.4%). The presence of post-NAC LVI was associated with an impaired DFS (HR=2.17, 95 CI [1.65 - 2.86], p<0.001) and the magnitude of this impact varied by BC subtype (p-value for interaction=0.02), (luminal BC: HR=1.75, p=0.006; TNBC : HR=2.77, p<0.001 ; HER2-positive BC : HR=5.12, p<0.001).
Table 1 Univariate analysis and multivariate analysis on DFS (whole population) Univariate Multivariate VariableClassHRClpHRCIpAge< 451 0.35 45-550.82[0.62 - 1.08] >550.87[0.64 - 1.19] Menopausal statuspremenopausal1.04[0.81 - 1.34]0.75 postmenopausal1 BMI class19-251 < 191.24[0.75 - 2.05]0.41 > 251.36[1.06 - 1.75]0.01 Tumor sizeT1-T21 T31.77[1.38 - 2.27]<0.011.77[ 1.32 - 2.38 ]<0.001Clinical nodal statusN01 N1-N2-N31.35[1.05 - 1.72]0.021.43[ 1.07 - 1.91 ]0.016HistologyDuctal1 Other1.24[0.87 - 1.78]0.24 GradeGrade I-II1 III1.24[0.87 - 1.78]0.07 Ki 67<201 >201.54[1.06 - 2.22]0.02 Mitotic index≤221 >221.18[0.9 - 1.53]0.23 DCIS componentno1 yes1.33[0.88 - 2.01]0.18 Pre-NAC LVIno1 yes1.35[0.88 - 2.01]0.09 ER statusnegative1 positive0.72[0.56 - 0.91]<0.01 PR statusnegative1 positive0.66[0.51 - 0.85]<0.01 HER2 statusnegative1 positive0.84[0.62 - 1.14]0.26 BC subtypeluminal1 TNBC1.53[1.17 - 2]<0.012.67[ 1.93 - 3.69 ]<0.001 HER20.99[0.72 - 1.38]0.971.25[ 0.82 - 1.88 ]0.299Post NAC parametersPost-NAC LVI (breast)no1 yes2.17[1.65 - 2.86]<0.012.3[ 1.72 - 3.08 ]<0.001pCRNo pCR1 pCR0,4[0.27 - 0.59]<0.01 Pathological nodal involvement0 1-31.48[1.11 - 1.97]<0.01 ≥4 N+3.13[2.34 - 4.19]<0.01 RCB class01 10.97[0.36 - 2.64]0.96 22.88[1.69 - 4.89]<0.01 35.21[3.01 - 9.02]<0.01 ER: oestrogene receptor PR: progesteron receptor RCB: residual cancer burden
Post-NAC LVI was an independent predictor of poor DFS, that overwhelmed the prognostic impact of pathological complete response in all 3 BC subtypes. Post-NAC LVI was also an independent predictor of poor OS in the whole cohort and in all BC subtypes.
Table 1 resumes univariate and multivariate analysis on DFS in whole population.
Conclusion: Post-NAC LVI is a strong independent prognostic factor associated with poor DFS and OS, that (i) should be systematically mentioned in pathological reports following NAC and (ii) could be used to select high risk patients candidates to second line trials in the post-neoadjuvant window.
Citation Format: Hamy-Petit A-S, Lam G-T, Laas E, Darrigues L, Balezeau T, Guerin J, Livartowski A, Sadacca B, Pierga J-Y, Vincent-Salomon A, Bidard F-C, Lerebours F, Brain E, Becette V, Rouzier R, Lae M, Reyal F. Lymphovascular invasion in breast carcinoma following neodjuvant chemotherapy is a strong prognosis factor [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-03-04.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A-S Hamy-Petit
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - G-T Lam
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - E Laas
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - L Darrigues
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - T Balezeau
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - J Guerin
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - A Livartowski
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - B Sadacca
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - J-Y Pierga
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - A Vincent-Salomon
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - F-C Bidard
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - F Lerebours
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - E Brain
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - V Becette
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - R Rouzier
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - M Lae
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - F Reyal
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Dendale R, Vincent-Salomon A, Mouret-Fourme E, Savignoni A, Medioni J, Campana F, Vilcoq J, De La Rochefordière A, Soussi T, Asselain B, De Cremoux P, Fourquet A. Medullary Breast Carcinoma: Prognostic Implications of P53 Expression. Int J Biol Markers 2018. [DOI: 10.1177/172460080301800202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Medullary breast carcinoma (MBC) is a rare pathological type of breast cancer. The rate of p53 protein accumulation is higher in MBC than in common invasive ductal carcinoma. Whether this particular feature of MBC influences the outcome after treatment is unknown. We retrospectively analyzed the characteristics, treatment and outcome of 71 patients with MBC treated between 1981 and 1996. The median age was 51 years (range 27–81) and the median clinical tumor size was 25 mm (range 0-70 mm). Breast-conserving treatment was offered when possible: 55 patients had undergone a tumorectomy and radiotherapy while 16 patients had undergone a mastectomy. p53 protein accumulation was determined by immunohistochemistry on paraffin-embedded tumor specimens from 58/71 samples available for this study. The median follow-up for the 56 survivors was 113 months (range 30–241). The 10-year survival and metastasis-free survival rates were 81% and 81.4%, respectively. The local recurrence rate was 16.4%. The two factors predicting outcome were pathological axillary node involvement in the 60 patients who underwent axillary dissection and adjuvant chemotherapy. p53 accumulation was found in 33/58 patients (57%). p53 status was not predictive of survival nor of distant or local recurrences. We confirm that medullary breast carcinoma has a favorable prognosis despite its aggressive pathological features. p53 protein accumulation, found in the majority of MBCs, was not related to outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R. Dendale
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Curie, Paris - France
| | | | | | - A. Savignoni
- Department of Biostatistics, Institut Curie, Paris - France
| | - J. Medioni
- Department of Biostatistics, Institut Curie, Paris - France
| | - F. Campana
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Curie, Paris - France
| | - J.R. Vilcoq
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Curie, Paris - France
| | | | - T. Soussi
- Genotoxicology of Tumors Laboratory, Institut Curie, Paris - France
| | - B. Asselain
- Department of Biostatistics, Institut Curie, Paris - France
| | - P. De Cremoux
- Department of Tumor Biology, Institut Curie, Paris - France
| | - A. Fourquet
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Curie, Paris - France
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Cottu P, D'Hondt V, Dureau S, Lerebours F, Desmoulins I, Heudel PE, Duhoux F, Levy C, Mouret-Reynier MA, Dalenc F, Frenel JS, Jouannaud C, Venat-Bouvet L, Nguyen S, Ferrero JM, Canon JL, Grenier J, Lemonnier J, Vincent-Salomon A, Delaloge S. Letrozole and palbociclib versus 3rd generation chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment of minal breast cancer. Results of the UNICANCER-eoPAL study. Ann Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
|
37
|
Lefort S, Thuleau A, Kieffer Y, Sirven P, Bieche I, Marangoni E, Vincent-Salomon A, Mechta-Grigoriou F. CXCR4 inhibitors could benefit to HER2 but not to triple-negative breast cancer patients. Oncogene 2017; 36:1211-1222. [PMID: 27669438 PMCID: PMC5340801 DOI: 10.1038/onc.2016.284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2016] [Revised: 06/27/2016] [Accepted: 07/03/2016] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
The CXCR4 receptor and its ligand CXCL12 (also named stromal cell-derived factor 1, SDF1) have a critical role in chemotaxis and homing, key steps in cancer metastasis. Although myofibroblasts expressing CXCL12 are associated with the presence of axillary metastases in HER2 breast cancers (BC), the therapeutic interest of targeting CXCR4/CXCL12 axis in the different BC subtypes remains unclear. Here, we investigate this question by testing antitumor activity of CXCR4 inhibitors in patient-derived xenografts (PDX), which faithfully reproduce human tumor properties. We observed that two CXCR4 inhibitors, AMD3100 and TN14003, efficiently impair tumor growth and metastasis dissemination in both Herceptin-sensitive and Herceptin-resistant HER2 BC. Conversely, blocking CXCR4/CXCL12 pathway in triple-negative (TN) BC does not reduce tumor growth, and can even increase metastatic spread. Moreover, although CXCR4 inhibitors significantly reduce myofibroblast content in all BC subtypes, they decrease angiogenesis only in HER2 BC. Thus, our findings suggest that targeting CXCR4 could provide some therapeutic interest for HER2 BC patients, whereas it has no impact or could even be detrimental for TN BC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Lefort
- Stress and Cancer Laboratory, LNCC Labelized Team, Institut Curie Research Department, 26 rue d'Ulm, 75248 Paris Cedex 05, France
- Inserm, U830, Genetics and Biology of Cancer, Paris, F-75248, France
| | - A Thuleau
- Laboratory of pre-clinical Investigation, Translational Research Department, Institut Curie Research Department, Paris, France
| | - Y Kieffer
- Stress and Cancer Laboratory, LNCC Labelized Team, Institut Curie Research Department, 26 rue d'Ulm, 75248 Paris Cedex 05, France
- Inserm, U830, Genetics and Biology of Cancer, Paris, F-75248, France
| | - P Sirven
- Stress and Cancer Laboratory, LNCC Labelized Team, Institut Curie Research Department, 26 rue d'Ulm, 75248 Paris Cedex 05, France
- Inserm, U830, Genetics and Biology of Cancer, Paris, F-75248, France
| | - I Bieche
- Service de Génétique, Unité de Pharmacogénétique, Institut Curie Hospital Group, Paris, France
| | - E Marangoni
- Laboratory of pre-clinical Investigation, Translational Research Department, Institut Curie Research Department, Paris, France
| | - A Vincent-Salomon
- Department of Pathology Institut Curie Hospital Group, Paris, France
| | - F Mechta-Grigoriou
- Stress and Cancer Laboratory, LNCC Labelized Team, Institut Curie Research Department, 26 rue d'Ulm, 75248 Paris Cedex 05, France
- Inserm, U830, Genetics and Biology of Cancer, Paris, F-75248, France
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Cottu PH, Boulai A, Callens C, Baulande S, Legoix-Ne P, Bernard V, Vincent-Salomon A, Benhamo V, Brain EGC, Chemlali W, Campone M, Bachelot TD, Giacchetti S, Bonneterre J, Bidard FC, Servois V, Comte A, Belin L, Sigal B, Bièche I. Abstract PD1-06: Comparison of mutational landscapes of primary breast cancer and first metastatic relapse: Results from the ESOPE study. Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs16-pd1-06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Genomic profile of breast cancer metastases (M) may differ from that of the primary tumor (PT). In a multicenter prospective study (ESOPE, NCT 01956552) including 130 patients with biopsies of the first metastatic deposit, we have shown that luminal breast cancers are the most prone to phenotypical subtype changes (Comte et al, ASCO 2016#550). We report here the first results of a comparative PT/M targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) mutational analysis.
Methods
Of 130 patients, 117 paired PT/M samples obtained before any treatment were available for analysis. Targeted Sequencing was done using Illumina Hiseq2500 technology with a custom made 95 breast cancer associated genes panel. Sequence data were aligned to the human reference genome (hg19) using Bowtie2 algorithm. Median depth was 607X and 87% of targets achieved 100X depth. SNVs and indels were called using GATK UnifiedGenotyper. We retained COSMIC confirmed non synonymous, exonic/splice variants and observed at a frequency lower than 0,1% in population. Further confirmation of detected variants was performed with comparison to public databases (cbioportal, tumorportal), and potential pathogenicity was evaluated with 4 different public algorithms. We present here the results obtained from the first 35 matched PT/M samples (liver mets 68%), focusing analysis on 40 genes including PIK3CA (20 genes), ER (6 genes) and MAPK (11 genes) pathways, RUNX1, CDH1 and TP53 genes.
Results
Patients characteristics are representative of patients with first line metastatic breast cancer (Comte et al, ASCO 2016#550). Among the 40 genes analyzed in the 70 samples, we detected 134 somatic mutations (70 in PT and 64 in M) including 15 indels and 119 SNV. Among these 134 mutations there were 74 different mutations (66SNV and 8 indels) classified pathogenic for 26 and of unknown pathogenicity for 48 of them. We detected at least 1 mutation in 31 PT and in 28 M. Median numbers of mutations were 1 in PT (range 1-9) and 1 in M (range1-22) samples (p=0.295, Wilcoxon rank sum test). Top ten mutated genes in PT included PIK3CA, TP53, NCOR1, NF1, GATA3, CDH1, ERBB3, PTEN, HRAS, INPP4B. In M samples, the 10 top genes were PIK3CA, TP53, ERBB3, AKT3, CDH1, ERBB4, GATA3, INPP4B, MET, MTOR. Only 3 ESR1 mutations were detected, including 1 PT/M pair and 1 M. Beyond highly shared PIK3CA and TP53 mutations, overall crude PT/M discordance rate was 31%. Analysis by histological subtypes showed PT and M specific mutational profiles, suggesting a role in ERB gene family (notably ERBB3) and MAPK driven pathways in early metastatic progression. Specific metastatic site analysis suggested enrichment in MAPK pathway mutations in liver metastases when compared to other sites. Variant allelic fractions were globally not significantly different between PT and M samples.
Conclusion
In this prospective multicenter series of systematic biopsies of first metastases, we report a targeted mutational analysis of matched PT and M samples not modified by previous therapy exposure. Early analyses suggest specific genotypical changes according to tumor subtype and/or metastatic site. Extended and updated results will be reported at the meeting.
Citation Format: Cottu PH, Boulai A, Callens C, Baulande S, Legoix-Ne P, Bernard V, Vincent-Salomon A, Benhamo V, Brain EGC, Chemlali W, Campone M, Bachelot TD, Giacchetti S, Bonneterre J, Bidard F-C, Servois V, Comte A, Belin L, Sigal B, Bièche I. Comparison of mutational landscapes of primary breast cancer and first metastatic relapse: Results from the ESOPE study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD1-06.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- PH Cottu
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Saint Cloud, France; Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France; Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; CHU Saint Louis, Paris, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - A Boulai
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Saint Cloud, France; Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France; Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; CHU Saint Louis, Paris, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - C Callens
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Saint Cloud, France; Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France; Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; CHU Saint Louis, Paris, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - S Baulande
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Saint Cloud, France; Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France; Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; CHU Saint Louis, Paris, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - P Legoix-Ne
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Saint Cloud, France; Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France; Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; CHU Saint Louis, Paris, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - V Bernard
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Saint Cloud, France; Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France; Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; CHU Saint Louis, Paris, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - A Vincent-Salomon
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Saint Cloud, France; Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France; Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; CHU Saint Louis, Paris, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - V Benhamo
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Saint Cloud, France; Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France; Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; CHU Saint Louis, Paris, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - EGC Brain
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Saint Cloud, France; Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France; Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; CHU Saint Louis, Paris, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - W Chemlali
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Saint Cloud, France; Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France; Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; CHU Saint Louis, Paris, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - M Campone
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Saint Cloud, France; Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France; Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; CHU Saint Louis, Paris, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - TD Bachelot
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Saint Cloud, France; Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France; Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; CHU Saint Louis, Paris, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - S Giacchetti
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Saint Cloud, France; Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France; Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; CHU Saint Louis, Paris, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - J Bonneterre
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Saint Cloud, France; Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France; Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; CHU Saint Louis, Paris, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - F-C Bidard
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Saint Cloud, France; Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France; Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; CHU Saint Louis, Paris, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - V Servois
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Saint Cloud, France; Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France; Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; CHU Saint Louis, Paris, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - A Comte
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Saint Cloud, France; Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France; Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; CHU Saint Louis, Paris, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - L Belin
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Saint Cloud, France; Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France; Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; CHU Saint Louis, Paris, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - B Sigal
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Saint Cloud, France; Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France; Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; CHU Saint Louis, Paris, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - I Bièche
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Saint Cloud, France; Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France; Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France; CHU Saint Louis, Paris, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Romero P, Deniziaut G, Benhamo V, Fuhrmann L, Berger F, Bhalshankar J, Gruel N, MacGrogan G, Popova T, Manié E, Stern MH, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Rouzier R, Delattre O, Bieche I, Vincent-Salomon A. Abstract P1-03-05: A comprehensive molecular analysis of medullary breast carcinoma: A model of immunomodulatory triple negative breast cancer subtype. Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs16-p1-03-05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Medullary breast carcinoma (MBC) is a rare subtype of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC)with specific genomic features within the spectrum of basal-like carcinoma. The frequent association between BRCA constitutive mutation and MBC phenotype has been reported previously. In this study including 19 MBC and 36 non-MMB basal-like carcinoma (BLC), we refine the genomic and transcriptomic knowledge about this entity. Using pan genomic Affymetrix genome-wide human SNP6.0 array, we show that i/ MBC harbour more copy number alterations and losses of heterozygocity than BLC and that ii/ the high frequency of BRCAness genomic trait among MBC. Unsupervised and supervised analysis of GeneChip Uman Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Array transcriptomic generated data confirmed that MBC clearly differ from BLC in terms of gene expression level, with 92 genes overexpressed and 154 genes underexpressed in MBC over BLC. Immune response and inflammatory response are the most differentially represented pathways in MBC over BLC. Pro apoptotic gene BCLG is by far the more overexpressed gene in MBC. A validation study conducted with RT-QPCR among 526 breast tumors form all molecular subtype confirmed the specificity of BCLG overexpression in MBC, which was confirmed at protein level using immunohistochemisytry. Moreover, we show that a vast majority of MBC belong o the immunomodulatory TNBC subtype according to Lehman et al. Finally, we confirm the better prognosis of MBC toward BLC. Our observations epitomize the importance of developing DNA repair targeting drugs and immunotherapy based trials in order to improve the outcome of such a specific entity.
Citation Format: Romero P, Deniziaut G, Benhamo V, Fuhrmann L, Berger F, Bhalshankar J, Gruel N, MacGrogan G, Popova T, Manié E, Stern M-H, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Rouzier R, Delattre O, Bieche I, Vincent-Salomon A. A comprehensive molecular analysis of medullary breast carcinoma: A model of immunomodulatory triple negative breast cancer subtype [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-03-05.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Romero
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - G Deniziaut
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - V Benhamo
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - L Fuhrmann
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - F Berger
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - J Bhalshankar
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - N Gruel
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - G MacGrogan
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - T Popova
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - E Manié
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - M-H Stern
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - D Stoppa-Lyonnet
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - R Rouzier
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - O Delattre
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - I Bieche
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Geyer FC, Ng CK, Piscuoglio S, Wen YH, Wen HC, Pareja F, Eberle CA, Burke KA, Lim RS, Natrajan R, Mariani O, Brogi E, Norton L, Vincent-Salomon A, Weigelt B, Reis-Filho JS. Abstract P1-05-03: The genomic landscape of breast metaplastic carcinoma. Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs16-p1-05-03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: Metaplastic breast carcinoma (MBC) is a rare histologic type of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), characterized by the presence of cells displaying squamous and/or mesenchymal differentiation. The transcriptomic profiles of MBCs have been reported to vary according to the type of metaplastic elements. The somatic genetic alterations that underpin this breast cancer subtype remain to be fully characterized. Here we sought to define the genomic landscape of MBCs, whether different subtypes of MBC would be driven by distinct constellations of genetic alterations, and to investigate functionally the impact of mutations affecting WNT pathway genes using non-malignant breast epithelial cells.
Methods: Thirty-five MBCs were retrieved from the pathology department of the authors' institutions and classified into the MBC histologic subtypes. All but one of the MBCs were of triple-negative phenotype. DNA was extracted from microdissected tumor-normal pairs and subjected to whole-exome sequencing. Somatic genetic alterations were identified using state-of-the-art bioinformatics algorithms. The genomic profiles of MBCs were compared to those of 69 common type TNBCs from The Cancer Genome Atlas. Overall mutation rates were compared using the Mann Whitney U test, and the frequency of mutations in each gene was compared using Fisher's exact test. RNA was extracted from a subset of MBCs and subjected to WNT signaling pathway activation analysis with the RT2 Profiler PCR Array. Triple-negative non-malignant breast epithelial cells (MCF10A and MCF12A) and cancer cell lines were utilized for 2D and 3D functional studies.
Results: Whole-exome analysis revealed that MBCs displayed a median of 103 (15-344) somatic mutations, which did not differ from the median number of somatic mutations in common type TNBCs (76, range 14-233). The most frequent recurrently mutated cancer genes included TP53 (69%) and PIK3CA (29%). MBCs more frequently harbored mutations in PI3K pathway genes than common type TNBCs (57% vs 22%, P<0.05), including mutations affecting PIK3CA (29% vs 7%), PIK3R1 (11% vs 0) and PTEN (11% vs 1%). MBCs also more frequently harbored mutations affecting WNT signaling pathway genes (46% vs 26%, P<0.05), including AXIN1 (6% vs 1%), WNT5A (6% vs 0) and APC (3% vs 0). MBC subtype analysis revealed that PIK3CA mutations were only detected in non-chondroid MBCs (53% vs 0), CHERP mutations were only found in chondroid MBCs (25% vs 0), whereas USP5 mutations only found in squamous MBCs (33% vs 0). MBCs with somatic mutations in WNT pathway genes had significantly higher WNT pathway activation than MBCs lacking mutations in these genes (P=0.0244). Consistent with the mesenchymal phenotype frequently exhibited by MBCs, in vitro experiments provided functional evidence that aberrant WNT pathway activation induces an epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) phenotype, with downregulation of epithelial markers and upregulation of EMT transcriptional inducers.
Conclusions: MBCs are significantly enriched for mutations affecting PI3K and WNT pathways, highlighting the importance of the dysregulation of the WNT pathway in MBC carcinogenesis. Moreover, our findings suggest that specific mutations are significantly associated with distinct histologic subtypes of MBCs.
Citation Format: Geyer FC, Ng CK, Piscuoglio S, Wen YH, Wen H-C, Pareja F, Eberle CA, Burke KA, Lim RS, Natrajan R, Mariani O, Brogi E, Norton L, Vincent-Salomon A, Weigelt B, Reis-Filho JS. The genomic landscape of breast metaplastic carcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-05-03.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- FC Geyer
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - CK Ng
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - S Piscuoglio
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - YH Wen
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - H-C Wen
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - F Pareja
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - CA Eberle
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - KA Burke
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - RS Lim
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - R Natrajan
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - O Mariani
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - E Brogi
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - L Norton
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - A Vincent-Salomon
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - B Weigelt
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - JS Reis-Filho
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; Institut Curie, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Lemaître S, Lecler A, Lévy-Gabriel C, Reyes C, Desjardins L, Gentien D, Zmuda M, Jacomet PV, Lumbroso-Le Rouic L, Dendale R, Vincent-Salomon A, Pierron G, Galatoire O, Cassoux N. Evisceration and ocular tumors: What are the consequences? J Fr Ophtalmol 2017; 40:93-101. [PMID: 28126270 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfo.2016.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2016] [Revised: 10/04/2016] [Accepted: 10/05/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Evisceration can be performed for blind, painful eyes. This surgery can promote the dissemination of tumor cells within the orbit if an ocular tumor has been missed preoperatively. METHODS We reviewed the medical records of patients who were eviscerated for blind, painful eyes between 2009 and 2014 and who were referred after the surgery to the Institut Curie or the Rothschild Foundation in Paris. We included the patients with a histological diagnosis of ocular tumor or orbital recurrence. Cytogenetic analysis was performed whenever possible. RESULTS Four patients turned out to have an ocular tumor after evisceration (two choroidal melanomas, a rhabdoid tumor and an adenocarcinoma of the retinal pigment epithelium); two had a history of prior ocular trauma. The tumors were diagnosed either on histological analysis of the intraocular contents (2 patients) or biopsy of orbital recurrence (2 patients). Prior to evisceration, fundus examination was not performed in 3 patients. One had preoperative imaging but no intraocular tumor was suspected. At the time of this study, 3 patients had had an orbital recurrence and died. We also found 2 patients who had an evisceration despite a past history of choroidal melanoma treated with proton beam therapy. CONCLUSION We showed that evisceration of eyes with unsuspected ocular malignancies was associated with a poor prognosis due to orbital recurrence and metastasis. The evisceration specimen should therefore always be sent for histological analysis in order to perform prompt adjuvant orbital radiotherapy if an ocular tumor is found.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Lemaître
- Institut Curie, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France; Université Paris Descartes, 12, rue de l'École-de-Médecine, 75270 Paris cedex 06, France.
| | - A Lecler
- Fondation ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild, 25-29, rue Manin, 75019 Paris, France
| | | | - C Reyes
- Institut Curie, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | - L Desjardins
- Institut Curie, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | - D Gentien
- Institut Curie, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | - M Zmuda
- Fondation ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild, 25-29, rue Manin, 75019 Paris, France
| | - P V Jacomet
- Fondation ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild, 25-29, rue Manin, 75019 Paris, France
| | | | - R Dendale
- Institut Curie, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France; ICPO centre de protonthérapie, 15, rue Georges-Clemenceau, 91400 Orsay, France
| | | | - G Pierron
- Institut Curie, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| | - O Galatoire
- Fondation ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild, 25-29, rue Manin, 75019 Paris, France
| | - N Cassoux
- Institut Curie, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Pierga JY, Riva F, Houy A, Saliou A, Madic J, Rampanou A, Hego C, Milder M, Cottu P, Sablin MP, Vincent-Salomon A, Lantz O, Stern MH, Proudhon C, Bidard FC. Patient-specific circulating tumor DNA detection during neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple negative breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw365.34] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
43
|
Curtit E, Vincent-Salomon A, Paget-Bailly S, Romieu G, Fumoleau P, Bonnefoi H, Jouannaud C, Petit T, Darut-Jouve A, Trillet-Lenoir V, Tarpin C, Pierga JY, Rios M, Jacquin J, Bachelot T, Cox D, Deleuze JF, Pauporte I, Henriques J, Pivot X. Effects of HER2 immuno-histochemistry expression levels on survival in patients treated by trastuzumab at the adjuvant setting in the SIGNAL/PHARE prospective cohort. Ann Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw364.40] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
44
|
Piscuoglio S, Ng CKY, Marchio C, Eberle CA, Guerini-Rocco E, Mariani O, Vincent-Salomon A, Reis-Filho JS, Weigelt B. Abstract P6-07-04: Distinct repertoires of somatic mutations affecting driver genes in mucinous and neuroendocrine carcinomas of the breast. Cancer Res 2016. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs15-p6-07-04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: Mucinous carcinoma of the breast (MCB) is a rare histologic type, which accounts for approximately 2% of all invasive breast cancers (IBCs) and is characterized by clusters of tumor cells floating in large amounts of extracellular mucin. MCB comprises two main subtypes based on architectural and cytologic features: mucinous A (paucicellular) and mucinous B (hypercellular). Although MCBs are low-grade ER-positive/HER2-negative tumors of luminal molecular subtype, these cancers lack concurrent losses of 16q and gains of 1q, the hallmark genetic features of low-grade ER+/HER2- breast cancers, and have low levels of genetic instability. Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the breast (NCB) accounts for 2% - 5% of IBCs and displays morphologic features similar to those of neuroendocrine tumors of other organs. Previous transcriptomic analyses have revealed that NCBs and mucinous B, but not mucinous A, breast cancers display similar gene expression profiles. The aims of this study were to determine whether MCBs and NCBs share a similar repertoire of somatic genetic alterations and if these aberrations are distinct from those reported in common forms of ER+/HER2- IBCs.
Material and methods: DNA extracted from microdissected MCBs (n=7 mucinous A, n=6 mucinous B), NCBs (n=14) and adjacent normal tissues were subjected to massively parallel sequencing targeting all exons of 254 genes most frequently mutated in IBC or related to DNA repair. Somatic point mutations were identified using MuTect and somatic insertions and deletions (indels) were defined using Strelka and Varscan2. We retrieved mutations in the same 254 genes in common forms of ER+/HER2- IBC (n=252) from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA).
Results: The most frequently mutated genes in MCBs were GATA3 (31% of cases, 4/13, all frame-shift indels), followed by KMT2C (MLL3) and MAP3K1 (both 23%). GATA3 and KMT2C (29%) were the most frequently mutated genes in mucinous A cancers, whereas MAP3K1 (33%) was the most frequently mutated gene in mucinous B cancers. ARID1A mutations were found in three of 14 (21%) NCBs, of which 2 were truncating mutations. A comparative analysis of the repertoire of somatic mutations found in mucinous A, mucinous B and NCBs did not reveal any statistically significant differences. As compared to common forms of ER+/HER2- IBCs, MCBs were found to have a significantly lower frequency of PIK3CA (8% vs 42%, p=0.02) mutations, which was particularly evident in mucinous A cancers (0% vs 42%, p=0.04). NCBs displayed significantly higher frequencies of somatic mutations affecting ARID1A (21% vs 2%, respectively, p=0.006), FOXA1 (14% vs 2%, respectively, p<0.05) and a lower frequency of PIK3CA somatic mutations (14% vs 42%, respectively, p<0.05) than common forms of ER+/HER2- IBCs.
Conclusion: The frequency of mutations affecting bona fide breast cancer genes differed among mucinous A, mucinous B and NCBs. The repertoire of somatic mutations found in MCBs and NCBs differed from that of common forms of ER+/HER2- IBCs, in particular by the low frequency of somatic mutations affecting PIK3CA.
Citation Format: Piscuoglio S, Ng CKY, Marchio C, Eberle CA, Guerini-Rocco E, Mariani O, Vincent-Salomon A, Reis-Filho JS, Weigelt B. Distinct repertoires of somatic mutations affecting driver genes in mucinous and neuroendocrine carcinomas of the breast. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-07-04.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Piscuoglio
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY; School of Pathology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - CKY Ng
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY; School of Pathology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - C Marchio
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY; School of Pathology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - CA Eberle
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY; School of Pathology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - E Guerini-Rocco
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY; School of Pathology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - O Mariani
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY; School of Pathology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - A Vincent-Salomon
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY; School of Pathology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - JS Reis-Filho
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY; School of Pathology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - B Weigelt
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY; School of Pathology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Institut Curie, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Piscuoglio S, Ng CKY, Cowell CF, Mariani O, Martelotto L, Natrajan R, Lim RS, Maher CA, Vincent-Salomon A, Weigelt B, Reis-Filho JS. Abstract P6-03-10: Genomic and transcriptomic heterogeneity in metaplastic breast carcinomas. Cancer Res 2016. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs15-p6-03-10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: Metaplastic breast carcinoma (MBC) is a rare form of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), accounting for approximately 0.2%-5% of all invasive breast cancers. These tumors are characterized by the presence of neoplastic cells displaying differentiation towards squamous epithelium or mesenchymal elements. MBCs are reported to have an aggressive clinical behavior, to exhibit a worse prognosis and to respond less frequently to conventional chemotherapy regimens than common forms of TNBCs. In this study, we sought to define whether morphologically distinct subgroups of MBCs would be underpinned by distinct gene expression or copy number profiles, and whether MBCs, akin to other special histologic types of TNBC (e.g. secretory carcinoma and adenoid cystic carcinoma), would be underpinned by a highly recurrent fusion gene.
Methods: RNA and DNA samples were extracted from microdissected frozen MBCs (5 squamous, 5 spindle and 7 chondroid) and subjected to gene expression profiling using the Illumina Human HT-12 v4 platform and gene copy number profiling using the Affymetrix Human SNP 6.0 arrays, respectively. Genes differentially expressed between MBC subtypes were identified using SAM, and functional annotation of these genes was performed using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis. Intrinsic molecular subtypes were determined using the PAM50 and claudin-low intrinsic gene lists. In addition, all cases were subjected to paired-end massively parallel RNA-sequencing (Illumina GAIIx). Putative expressed fusion transcripts were identified using a validated algorithm (i.e. ChimeraScan), and confirmed by means of RT-PCR.
Results: MBCs with spindle cell morphology were all classified as of claudin-low intrinsic subtype, whereas MBCs with chondroid or squamous cell metaplasia were classified as of normal breast-like, basal-like or claudin-low subtypes, suggesting that these morphologic subgroups are heterogeneous. Unsupervised analysis of microarray and RNA-sequencing gene expression data further demonstrated that MBCs with spindle cell differentiation displayed distinctive transcriptomic profiles, and formed clusters distinct from those enriched for MBCs with chondroid and squamous cell metaplasia. MBCs with spindle cell morphology preferentially expressed regulators of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition including lower expression of E-cadherin and EpCAM. At the genomic level, MBC subtypes displayed patterns of gene copy number alterations similar to those of common forms of TNBCs from The Cancer Genome Atlas, and no significant differences were found among the distinct MBC subtypes. Nine in-frame fusion genes, TBL1XR1-PIK3CA, WAPL-CDHR1, MAP2K3-HMGCLL, PARG-BMS1, FN1-ICAM1, TNKS1BP1-SPARC, AAK1-ARNT2, MBTPS1-TCEANC2 and PSMA6-SHMT1 were identified and validated in the index cases, however none of these was found to be recurrent in the cases analyzed in this study.
Conclusion: MBC subtypes, despite harboring similar patterns of gene copy number alterations, display significant transcriptomic differences, which may account for their distinct histologic features. Our findings also demonstrate that unlike other histologic special types of TNBC, MBCs are not underpinned by a highly recurrent expressed fusion gene.
Citation Format: Piscuoglio S, Ng CKY, Cowell CF, Mariani O, Martelotto L, Natrajan R, Lim RS, Maher CA, Vincent-Salomon A, Weigelt B, Reis-Filho JS. Genomic and transcriptomic heterogeneity in metaplastic breast carcinomas. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-03-10.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Piscuoglio
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY; Institut Curie, Paris, France; The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; The Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | - CKY Ng
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY; Institut Curie, Paris, France; The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; The Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | - CF Cowell
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY; Institut Curie, Paris, France; The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; The Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | - O Mariani
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY; Institut Curie, Paris, France; The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; The Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | - L Martelotto
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY; Institut Curie, Paris, France; The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; The Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | - R Natrajan
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY; Institut Curie, Paris, France; The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; The Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | - RS Lim
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY; Institut Curie, Paris, France; The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; The Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | - CA Maher
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY; Institut Curie, Paris, France; The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; The Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | - A Vincent-Salomon
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY; Institut Curie, Paris, France; The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; The Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | - B Weigelt
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY; Institut Curie, Paris, France; The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; The Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | - JS Reis-Filho
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY; Institut Curie, Paris, France; The Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; The Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Vincent-Salomon A, Ferrari A, Pivot X, Macgrogan G, Arnould L, Treilleux I, Romieux G, Sertier AS, Thomas E, Tonon L, Boyault S, Kielbassa J, Letexier V, Pauporte I, Birbaum D, Saintigny P, Cox D, Viari A. Abstract P6-07-13: New insights on HER2 amplification from the constitutional and somatic standpoints: Results from the ICGC and SIGNAL/Phare studies. Cancer Res 2016. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs15-p6-07-13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancers are defined by the amplification and/or overexpression of the human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2/ERBB2) gene on chromosome region 17q12. Although anti-HER2 targeted therapies have greatly improved treatment of HER2+ breast cancer, the magnitude of benefit varies widely between patients. Deciphering the genomic and genetic heterogeneity of HER2+ breast cancer may provide a basis to better understand their natural history, opening new avenues of treatment.
Methods: As part of the ICGC Breast Cancer Working Group effort, we combined whole genome sequencing and transcriptomic analyses of 64 HER2+ primary invasive carcinomas, and a genome wide association study (GWAS) of over 9.836 breast cancer patients in the prospective SIGNAL/PHARE cohort (NCT00381901 – RECF1098).
Results: Using WGS data we precisely delineate the ERBB2 amplicon as a 106 kb region involving six genes and show that the amplification mechanism was consistent with breakage-fusion-bridge (BFB) cycles. Four RNA expression-based groups were identified, displaying specific genomic alterations in terms of amplification, rearrangements and mutations. On other hand, GWAS analyses failed to identify any constitutional variants associated with HER2 amplification.
Discussion: By combining whole genome sequencing and expression analysis, we provide evidence showing that HER2+ tumours display considerably more molecular heterogeneity than previously reported. These results are reinforced with the lack of association between any genetic variants and HER2 amplification from GWAS analyses. Taken as a whole, these results suggest that HER2+ breast cancers do not represent per se a homogeneous subtype, but are distributed along the whole breast cancer spectrum, from ER-positive luminal to ER-negative basal phenotype. Genome alterations present in HER2+ tumors are in accordance with these phenotypes, and it is likely that the HER2 amplification is a secondary event in the course of tumorigenesis, not favored by any particular constitutional or somatic genetic variants.
Citation Format: Vincent-Salomon A, Ferrari A, Pivot X, Macgrogan G, Arnould L, Treilleux I, Romieux G, Sertier A-S, Thomas E, Tonon L, Boyault S, Kielbassa J, Letexier V, Pauporte I, Birbaum D, Saintigny P, Cox D, Viari A. New insights on HER2 amplification from the constitutional and somatic standpoints: Results from the ICGC and SIGNAL/Phare studies. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-07-13.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Vincent-Salomon
- Curie Institute, Paris, France; Leon Berard Cancer Center, Lyon, France; Uiniversity Hospital Minjoz, Besançon, France; Cancer Center, Bordeaux, France; GF Leclerc Cancer Center, Dijon, France; Val d'Autel Cancer Center, Montpellier, France; INCa, Paris, France; Inserm - Paoli Calmette Cancer Center, Marseille, France
| | - A Ferrari
- Curie Institute, Paris, France; Leon Berard Cancer Center, Lyon, France; Uiniversity Hospital Minjoz, Besançon, France; Cancer Center, Bordeaux, France; GF Leclerc Cancer Center, Dijon, France; Val d'Autel Cancer Center, Montpellier, France; INCa, Paris, France; Inserm - Paoli Calmette Cancer Center, Marseille, France
| | - X Pivot
- Curie Institute, Paris, France; Leon Berard Cancer Center, Lyon, France; Uiniversity Hospital Minjoz, Besançon, France; Cancer Center, Bordeaux, France; GF Leclerc Cancer Center, Dijon, France; Val d'Autel Cancer Center, Montpellier, France; INCa, Paris, France; Inserm - Paoli Calmette Cancer Center, Marseille, France
| | - G Macgrogan
- Curie Institute, Paris, France; Leon Berard Cancer Center, Lyon, France; Uiniversity Hospital Minjoz, Besançon, France; Cancer Center, Bordeaux, France; GF Leclerc Cancer Center, Dijon, France; Val d'Autel Cancer Center, Montpellier, France; INCa, Paris, France; Inserm - Paoli Calmette Cancer Center, Marseille, France
| | - L Arnould
- Curie Institute, Paris, France; Leon Berard Cancer Center, Lyon, France; Uiniversity Hospital Minjoz, Besançon, France; Cancer Center, Bordeaux, France; GF Leclerc Cancer Center, Dijon, France; Val d'Autel Cancer Center, Montpellier, France; INCa, Paris, France; Inserm - Paoli Calmette Cancer Center, Marseille, France
| | - I Treilleux
- Curie Institute, Paris, France; Leon Berard Cancer Center, Lyon, France; Uiniversity Hospital Minjoz, Besançon, France; Cancer Center, Bordeaux, France; GF Leclerc Cancer Center, Dijon, France; Val d'Autel Cancer Center, Montpellier, France; INCa, Paris, France; Inserm - Paoli Calmette Cancer Center, Marseille, France
| | - G Romieux
- Curie Institute, Paris, France; Leon Berard Cancer Center, Lyon, France; Uiniversity Hospital Minjoz, Besançon, France; Cancer Center, Bordeaux, France; GF Leclerc Cancer Center, Dijon, France; Val d'Autel Cancer Center, Montpellier, France; INCa, Paris, France; Inserm - Paoli Calmette Cancer Center, Marseille, France
| | - A-S Sertier
- Curie Institute, Paris, France; Leon Berard Cancer Center, Lyon, France; Uiniversity Hospital Minjoz, Besançon, France; Cancer Center, Bordeaux, France; GF Leclerc Cancer Center, Dijon, France; Val d'Autel Cancer Center, Montpellier, France; INCa, Paris, France; Inserm - Paoli Calmette Cancer Center, Marseille, France
| | - E Thomas
- Curie Institute, Paris, France; Leon Berard Cancer Center, Lyon, France; Uiniversity Hospital Minjoz, Besançon, France; Cancer Center, Bordeaux, France; GF Leclerc Cancer Center, Dijon, France; Val d'Autel Cancer Center, Montpellier, France; INCa, Paris, France; Inserm - Paoli Calmette Cancer Center, Marseille, France
| | - L Tonon
- Curie Institute, Paris, France; Leon Berard Cancer Center, Lyon, France; Uiniversity Hospital Minjoz, Besançon, France; Cancer Center, Bordeaux, France; GF Leclerc Cancer Center, Dijon, France; Val d'Autel Cancer Center, Montpellier, France; INCa, Paris, France; Inserm - Paoli Calmette Cancer Center, Marseille, France
| | - S Boyault
- Curie Institute, Paris, France; Leon Berard Cancer Center, Lyon, France; Uiniversity Hospital Minjoz, Besançon, France; Cancer Center, Bordeaux, France; GF Leclerc Cancer Center, Dijon, France; Val d'Autel Cancer Center, Montpellier, France; INCa, Paris, France; Inserm - Paoli Calmette Cancer Center, Marseille, France
| | - J Kielbassa
- Curie Institute, Paris, France; Leon Berard Cancer Center, Lyon, France; Uiniversity Hospital Minjoz, Besançon, France; Cancer Center, Bordeaux, France; GF Leclerc Cancer Center, Dijon, France; Val d'Autel Cancer Center, Montpellier, France; INCa, Paris, France; Inserm - Paoli Calmette Cancer Center, Marseille, France
| | - V Letexier
- Curie Institute, Paris, France; Leon Berard Cancer Center, Lyon, France; Uiniversity Hospital Minjoz, Besançon, France; Cancer Center, Bordeaux, France; GF Leclerc Cancer Center, Dijon, France; Val d'Autel Cancer Center, Montpellier, France; INCa, Paris, France; Inserm - Paoli Calmette Cancer Center, Marseille, France
| | - I Pauporte
- Curie Institute, Paris, France; Leon Berard Cancer Center, Lyon, France; Uiniversity Hospital Minjoz, Besançon, France; Cancer Center, Bordeaux, France; GF Leclerc Cancer Center, Dijon, France; Val d'Autel Cancer Center, Montpellier, France; INCa, Paris, France; Inserm - Paoli Calmette Cancer Center, Marseille, France
| | - D Birbaum
- Curie Institute, Paris, France; Leon Berard Cancer Center, Lyon, France; Uiniversity Hospital Minjoz, Besançon, France; Cancer Center, Bordeaux, France; GF Leclerc Cancer Center, Dijon, France; Val d'Autel Cancer Center, Montpellier, France; INCa, Paris, France; Inserm - Paoli Calmette Cancer Center, Marseille, France
| | - P Saintigny
- Curie Institute, Paris, France; Leon Berard Cancer Center, Lyon, France; Uiniversity Hospital Minjoz, Besançon, France; Cancer Center, Bordeaux, France; GF Leclerc Cancer Center, Dijon, France; Val d'Autel Cancer Center, Montpellier, France; INCa, Paris, France; Inserm - Paoli Calmette Cancer Center, Marseille, France
| | - D Cox
- Curie Institute, Paris, France; Leon Berard Cancer Center, Lyon, France; Uiniversity Hospital Minjoz, Besançon, France; Cancer Center, Bordeaux, France; GF Leclerc Cancer Center, Dijon, France; Val d'Autel Cancer Center, Montpellier, France; INCa, Paris, France; Inserm - Paoli Calmette Cancer Center, Marseille, France
| | - A Viari
- Curie Institute, Paris, France; Leon Berard Cancer Center, Lyon, France; Uiniversity Hospital Minjoz, Besançon, France; Cancer Center, Bordeaux, France; GF Leclerc Cancer Center, Dijon, France; Val d'Autel Cancer Center, Montpellier, France; INCa, Paris, France; Inserm - Paoli Calmette Cancer Center, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Comte A, Sigal-Zafrani B, Belin L, Bièche I, Callens C, Diéras V, Bidard FC, Mariani O, Servois V, Szwarc D, Vincent-Salomon A, Brain ECG, Cottu PH. Abstract P2-05-06: Clinical utility of systematic biopsy of first metastatic event in breast cancer: Results from a prospective multicenter trial. Cancer Res 2016. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs15-p2-05-06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cumulative evidence for phenotypic and molecular heterogeneity between primary breast cancer (BC) site and matched metastasis (mets) has been obtained in retrospective studies. Current expert consensus suggests performing biopsies of mets, but clinical utility and cost are unknown. The primary objective of the ESOPE study (NCT01956552) was to compare the phenotype and genotype of the primary tumor (PT) with those of matched mets at time of first distant relapse, before the start of any treatment, in order to optimize the treatment of mets
PATIENTS and METHODS: Between Nov. 2010 and Sept. 2013, we conducted a prospective multicenter study on BC patients (pts) with diagnosis of first mets. All pts were to have available Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded (FFPE) PT sample and mets accessible to either percutaneous or surgical sampling. All tissue samples were centrally analyzed with immunohistochemistry (ER, PgR, HER2, and Ki67) and FISH when indicated. Frozen samples were stored for further analyses. We recorded intended therapeutic decision before and after biopsy.
RESULTS: Of 93 pts included, 89 were eligible for biopsy. Median age was 57 years (28-81); median interval between PT and mets was 42 months (0-211), including 14 pts with novo metastatic breast cancer. Mets biopsy was performed in 85 pts (96%, refusal n=2, not feasible n=2). Toxicity was limited to only 1 grade 1 hemorrhage. Sampled sites were liver (44%), lung (16%), bone (13%), lymph node (13%), skin/muscle/chest wall (9%), ovary/peritoneum (4%), and adrenal gland (1%). PT was not available in 4 pts; mets biopsy was non contributive in 6 pts but led to a diagnosis of second primary cancer in 3 pts.
In 72 pts with matched PT and mets, PT were luminal A (n=11), luminal B (n=33), triple negative (n=13), HER2 (n=13), non-evaluable (n=2). Mets were luminal A (n=6), luminal B (n=30), triple negative (n=16), HER2 (n=14), non-evaluable (n=6). Discrepancy rates were: ER 18% [kappa for concordance =0.6, CI 95 % (0.42-0.77)], PgR: 39% [kappa=0.19, CI 95% (0.01-0.39)], Her2: 4% [kappa=0.86, CI 95% (0.7-1)], Ki67: 25% [kappa=0.19, CI 95% (-0.09; 0.49)].
The most frequent discrepancy rate was observed in pts with lum A PT, as only 3/10 developed Lum A mets. HER2 and triple negative were the most stable subtypes (12/13 and 12/12 respectively). Most importantly, mets biopsy led to a change in therapeutic decision in 25 pts (independent evaluation by 2 oncologists). Additional comparative targeted NGS analyses are ongoing on a first subset of 54 FFPE paired samples, and parallel whole exome sequencing is planned on 38 paired samples with available constitutional DNA.
CONCLUSION: Comparative analysis of breast cancer PT and first mets is routinely feasible, with very low morbidity and a significant impact for patients' management: 29% had a second cancer diagnosis or were proposed a therapeutic change. Furthermore, this study will provide additional data on quality and quantity of tissue available for molecular analysis, and ultimately in terms of cost-efficacy.
Citation Format: Comte A, Sigal-Zafrani B, Belin L, Bièche I, Callens C, Diéras V, Bidard F-C, Mariani O, Servois V, Szwarc D, Vincent-Salomon A, Brain ECG, Cottu PH. Clinical utility of systematic biopsy of first metastatic event in breast cancer: Results from a prospective multicenter trial. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-05-06.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Comte
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Saint Cloud, France
| | - B Sigal-Zafrani
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Saint Cloud, France
| | - L Belin
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Saint Cloud, France
| | - I Bièche
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Saint Cloud, France
| | - C Callens
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Saint Cloud, France
| | - V Diéras
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Saint Cloud, France
| | - F-C Bidard
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Saint Cloud, France
| | - O Mariani
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Saint Cloud, France
| | - V Servois
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Saint Cloud, France
| | - D Szwarc
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Saint Cloud, France
| | | | - ECG Brain
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Saint Cloud, France
| | - PH Cottu
- Institut Curie, Paris, France; Institut Curie, Saint Cloud, France
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Ng CKY, Bidard FC, Piscuoglio S, Lim RS, Pierga JY, Cottu P, Vincent-Salomon A, Viale A, Norton L, Sigal B, Weigelt B, Reis-Filho JS. Abstract P2-01-02: Capturing intra-tumor genetic heterogeneity in cell-free plasma DNA from patients with oligometastatic breast cancer. Cancer Res 2016. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs15-p2-01-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: The analysis of cell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA) from plasma has been heralded as a non-invasive technique for disease monitoring and as a means to overcome the challenges posed by intra-tumor genetic heterogeneity. ctDNA levels have been shown to correlate with tumor burden in breast cancer patients. Hence, we sought to define whether massively parallel sequencing of cell-free plasma DNA would capture the entire repertoire of somatic mutations present in the primary tumors and/ or metastases from patients with oligometastatic breast cancer.
Methods: Frozen diagnostic biopsies from primary tumors and their distant metastases were obtained from five prospectively accrued treatment-naïve patients with stage IV breast cancer at presentation (1 estrogen receptor (ER)+/HER2+, 2 ER+/HER2-, 2 ER-/HER2+). A second, independent formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) diagnostic biopsy was obtained from the primary tumor and metastasis from 4 patients. Plasma samples were obtained from all patients. DNA samples from microdissected frozen tumors and peripheral blood, as well as plasma from one patient, were subjected to high-depth whole exome sequencing. DNA samples from all biopsies (frozen/FFPE), plasma and peripheral blood were subjected to targeted capture massively parallel sequencing, with baits for all somatic mutations detected by whole exome sequencing and all exons of the 100 genes most frequently mutated in breast cancer. Driver mutations were defined by state-of-the-art bioinformatic methods and literature search.
Results: We identified and confirmed a median of 54 (range 25-75) and 53 (range 26-85) non-synonymous mutations in the primary tumors and metastases from the 5 cases analyzed, respectively. By sequencing the plasma DNA to a median depth of 248x (range 92-431x), state-of-the-art mutation callers revealed 0-4 mutations (0%-8% of mutations) per patient, and direct interrogation of the sequencing data, based on prior knowledge of the mutations present in the lesions, resulted in the identification of 2-18 mutations (3%-38% of mutations) per patient. Of the bona fide driver mutations, 2/3 TP53 mutations, 0/1 PIK3CA hotspot mutation, 0/1 BRCA2 frameshift mutation, 0/1 GATA3 frameshift mutation and 0/1 ERBB3 activating mutation were captured in the plasma DNA. A SMAD4 pathogenic mutation and a TCF7L2 truncating mutation were found in two diagnostic biopsies of metastatic lesions but not in two biopsies of the primary tumors in one patient each. Whilst the SMAD4 mutation was detected in the plasma DNA from the respective patient, the TCF7L2 mutation was not. Of the 62 mutations restricted to the primary tumors (0-42 per patient) and 74 restricted to the metastatic tumors (1-41 per patient), 4 and 7, respectively, were captured in the plasma DNA.
Conclusions: Massively parallel sequencing assessment of plasma DNA allows for the identification of mutations found in primary tumors and/ or their metastases, however, only a subset of these could be detected at up to 431x depth. These observations suggest that current approaches for whole exome or targeted massively parallel sequencing may not be sufficient to capture the genetic heterogeneity of breast cancers in patients with oligometastatic disease.
Citation Format: Ng CKY, Bidard F-C, Piscuoglio S, Lim RS, Pierga J-Y, Cottu P, Vincent-Salomon A, Viale A, Norton L, Sigal B, Weigelt B, Reis-Filho JS. Capturing intra-tumor genetic heterogeneity in cell-free plasma DNA from patients with oligometastatic breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-01-02.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- CKY Ng
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY
| | - F-C Bidard
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY
| | - S Piscuoglio
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY
| | - RS Lim
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY
| | - J-Y Pierga
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY
| | - P Cottu
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY
| | - A Vincent-Salomon
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY
| | - A Viale
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY
| | - L Norton
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY
| | - B Sigal
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY
| | - B Weigelt
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY
| | - JS Reis-Filho
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY; Institut Curie, Paris, France; Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Mouttet D, Laé M, Caly M, Gentien D, Carpentier S, Peyro-Saint-Paul H, Vincent-Salomon A, Rouzier R, Sigal-Zafrani B, Sastre-Garau X, Reyal F. Estrogen-Receptor, Progesterone-Receptor and HER2 Status Determination in Invasive Breast Cancer. Concordance between Immuno-Histochemistry and MapQuant™ Microarray Based Assay. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0146474. [PMID: 26829108 PMCID: PMC4735463 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2015] [Accepted: 12/17/2015] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Hormone receptor status and HER2 status are of critical interest in determining the prognosis of breast cancer patients. Their status is routinely assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC). However, it is subject to intra-laboratory and inter-laboratory variability. The aim of our study was to compare the estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and HER2 status as determined by the MapQuant™ test to the routine immuno-histochemical tests in early stage invasive breast cancer in a large comprehensive cancer center. Patients and Methods We retrospectively studied 163 invasive early-stage breast carcinoma with standard IHC status. The genomic status was determined using the MapQuant™ test providing the genomic grade index. Results We found only 4 tumours out of 161 (2.5%) with discrepant IHC and genomic results concerning ER status. The concordance rate between the two methods was 97.5% and the Cohen’s Kappa coefficient was 0.89. Comparison between the MapQuant™ PR status and the PR IHC status gave more discrepancies. The concordance rate between the two methods was 91.4% and the Cohen’s Kappa coefficient was 0.74. The HER2 MapQuant™ test was classified as « undetermined » in 2 out of 163 cases (1.2%). One HER2 IHC-negative tumour was found positive with a high HER2 MapQuant™ genomic score. The concordance rate between the two methods was 99.3% and the Cohen’s Kappa coefficient was 0.86. Conclusion Our results show that the MapQuant™ assay, based on mRNA expression assay, provides an objective and quantitative assessment of Estrogen receptor, Progesterone receptor and HER2 status in invasive breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D. Mouttet
- Department of Surgery, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - M. Laé
- Department of Tumor Biology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - M. Caly
- Department of Tumor Biology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - D. Gentien
- Department of Translational Research, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | - R. Rouzier
- Department of Surgery, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | | | | | - F. Reyal
- Department of Surgery, Institut Curie, Paris, France
- Residual Tumor and Response to Treatment Team, Institut Curie, Department of Translational Research, Paris, France
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Rossi L, Laas E, Mallon P, Vincent-Salomon A, Guinebretiere JM, Lerebours F, Rouzier R, Pierga JY, Reyal F. Prognostic impact of discrepant Ki67 and mitotic index on hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast carcinoma. Br J Cancer 2015; 113:996-1002. [PMID: 26379080 PMCID: PMC4651130 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2015.239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Revised: 06/12/2015] [Accepted: 06/04/2015] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Inconsistencies between mitotic index (MI) and Ki67 measures have been identified in many breast tumour samples. The aim of this study was to describe the prognosis of hormone receptor-positive (HR+) HER2− tumours having discrepant MI and Ki67. Methods: We included a cohort of breast cancer patients initially treated by surgery between 2001 and 2005 in the Institut Curie. Breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were analysed according to three proliferation groups: high MI/high Ki67 (MI=3, Ki67>20%), low MI/low Ki67 (MI<3, Ki67⩽20%) and discrepant (high MI/low Ki67 or low MI/high Ki67). Results: Among the 1430 patients, 19.6% had discrepant Ki67 and MI, 11.6% had high markers and 68.8% had low markers. The 5-year BCSS was 95.8%, 95% CI (0.93–0.98) in the discrepant group, 99.3%, 95% CI (0.993–0.999) in the low-proliferation group and 91.8%, 95% CI (0.88–0.96) in the high-proliferation group. In multivariate analysis, the survival of the discrepant group was lower than that of the low-proliferation group: BCSS hazard ratio (HR)=3.01 (1.32–6.84; P=0.008) and DFS HR=2.07, 95% CI (1.31–3.26; P=0.002). Among grade 2 tumours in multivariate analysis, DFS of the discrepant group was lower than that of the low MI/low Ki67 group: HR=1.98, 95% CI (1.14–3.46), P=0.02. Regarding BCSS, the obtained results were similar. Conclusion: The prognosis of patients with discrepant MI and Ki67 appears intermediate between that of low MI/low Ki67 and high MI/high Ki67 groups. These markers should be jointly analysed to clarify prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Rossi
- Département de chirurgie, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France
| | - E Laas
- Service de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, Hôpital Tenon, 75020 Paris, France
| | - P Mallon
- Craigavon Area Hospital Breast Unit BT63 5QQ, Portadown, Northern Ireland
| | - A Vincent-Salomon
- Département de biologie des tumeurs, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France
| | - J-M Guinebretiere
- Département de biologie des tumeurs, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France
| | - F Lerebours
- Département d'oncologie médicale, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France
| | - R Rouzier
- Département de chirurgie, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France.,Equipe d'Accueil 7285, 'Risk and Safety in Clinical Medicine for women and Perinatal Health', University Versailles-Saint-Quentin, 78180 Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France
| | - J-Y Pierga
- Département d'oncologie médicale, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France
| | - F Reyal
- Département de chirurgie, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France.,Département de recherche translationnelle, Equipe résidu tumoral et réponse au traitement, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France.,INSERM U932 Immunity and Cancer, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|