Ovarian cancer prevention by opportunistic salpingectomy is a new de facto standard in Germany

PURPOSE

The most prevalent and aggressive subtype of epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC), high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC), originates in many cases from the fallopian tubes. Because of poor prognosis and lack of effective screening for early detection, opportunistic salpingectomy (OS) for prevention of EOC is being implemented into clinical routine in several countries worldwide. Taking the opportunity of a gynecological surgery in women at average cancer risk, extramural fallopian tubes are completely resected preserving the ovaries with their infundibulopelvic blood supply. Until recently, only 13 of the 130 national partner societies of the International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology (FIGO) have published a statement on OS. This study aimed to analyze the acceptance of OS in Germany.

METHODS

(1) Survey of German gynecologists in 2015 and 2022 by the Department of Gynecology of the Jena University Hospital in co-operation with the Department of Gynecology at Charité-University Medicine Berlin with support of NOGGO e. V. and AGO e. V. (2) Salpingectomy numbers in Germany for years 2005-2020 as retrieved from the Federal Statistical Office of Germany (Destatis).

RESULTS

(1) Survey: Number of participants was 203 in 2015 and 166 in 2022, respectively. Nearly all respondents (2015: 92%, 2022: 98%) have already performed bilateral salpingectomy without oophorectomy in combination with benign hysterectomy with the intention to reduce the risk for malignant (2015: 96%, 2022: 97%) and benign (2015: 47%, 2022: 38%) disorders. Compared to 2015 (56.6%), considerably more survey participants performed OS in > 50% or in all cases in 2022 (89.0%). Recommendation of OS for all women with completed family planning at benign pelvic surgery was approved by 68% in 2015 and 74% in 2022. (2) Case number analysis: In 2020, four times more cases of salpingectomy were reported by German public hospitals compared to 2005 (n = 50,398 vs. n = 12,286). Of all inpatient hysterectomies in German hospitals in 2020, 45% were combined with salpingectomy, and more than 65% in women at the age of 35 to 49 years.

CONCLUSION

Mounting scientific plausibility regarding involvement of fallopian tubes in the pathogenesis of EOC led to change of clinical acceptance of OS in many countries including in Germany. Case number data and widespread expert judgment demonstrate that OS has become a routine procedure in Germany and a de facto standard for primary prevention of EOC.

Impact of COVID-19 on gynaecological patient care: results of patient's survey with 327 patients

Purpose

The pandemic SARS-CoV-2 poses new and unprecedented challenges for health care systems on a national and global level. Although the current situation has been going on for more than 1 year, there is limited data on the impact of the pandemic on general hospital and medical practice care. This survey captures the perspective of patients with gynaecological diseases of this impact.

Methods

Using a paper-based questionnaire, 327 patients were asked about medical care and their experiences during the pandemic at the University Hospital Bonn and the University Hospital Charité Berlin. The study was performed from the 1st June to 30th September 2020.

Results

A total of 327 patients participated in the study: 156 stated to have been tested for coronavirus, and 1 patient reported a positive test. 41.3% of the patients felt insecure about the current situation, 30.4% were concerned about the risk of infection during the hospital stay. The pandemic-specific measures in hospitals and medical practices unsettled 6.8% of patients. 18.1% of patients feared that their gynaecological disease would not be treated adequately due to the pandemic. 55.7% of patients reported that their confidence in their physicians has increased during the pandemic.

Conclusion

The results show that patients’ confidence in the healthcare system and the physicians acting significantly increased during the COVID-19 crisis. Transparent and comprehensive information policy regarding actions and restrictions within the COVID-19 crisis eases patients concerns and improves patients’ confidence in their physicians, which is crucial for a successful treatment’s outcome.

Statement by the Kommission Ovar of the AGO: The New FIGO and WHO Classifications of Ovarian, Fallopian Tube and Primary Peritoneal Cancer

More than 25 years after the last revision, in 2012 the FIGO Oncology Committee began revising the FIGO classification for staging ovarian, Fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancers. The new classification has become effective with its publication at the beginning of 2014. Following recent findings on the pathogenesis of ovarian, Fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancer and reflecting standard clinical practice, the three entities have now been classified uniformly. The histological subtype is included (high-grade serous - HGSC; low-grade serous - LGSC; mucinous - MC; clear cell - CCC; endometrioid - EC). Stages III and IV have been fundamentally changed: stage IIIA now refers to a localized tumor limited to the pelvis with (only) retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis (formerly classified as IIIC). Stage IV has been divided into IVA and IVB, with IVA defined as malignant pleural effusion and IVB as parenchymatous or extra-abdominal metastasis including inguinal and mediastinal lymph node metastasis as well as umbilical metastasis. A new WHO classification was published almost concurrently. The classification of serous tumors addresses the issue of the tubal carcinogenesis of serous ovarian cancer, even if no tubal precursor lesions are found for up to 30 % of serous high-grade cancers. The number of subgroups was reduced and subgroups now include only high-grade serous, low-grade serous, mucinous, seromucinous, endometrioid, clear cell and Brenner tumors. The category "transitional cell carcinomas" has been dropped and the classification "seromucinous tumors" has been newly added. More attention has been focused on the role of borderline tumors as a stage in the progression from benign to invasive lesions.

Polymorphism of the IL-8 gene and the risk of ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer still represents a challenge in gynecological oncology. Most patients are diagnosed in an advanced tumor stage. No specific screening or prevention strategies for ovarian cancer exist as of yet. Interleukin 8 (IL-8) is a pro-inflammatory chemokine known for its angiogenetic activity, and is supposedly responsible for tumor-associated angiogenesis in several malignant tumors. The aim of the study was to investigate the susceptibility of patients with an IL-8 gene polymorphism to developing ovarian cancer. Four single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (IL-8 -251, IL-8 +781, IL-8 +1633 and IL-8 +2767) of the IL-8 gene were screened, using the PCR method in 268 patients with ovarian cancer and 426 healthy women as a control group. Significant associations were noted in patients with the IL-8 +781 (T/T) genotype (p=0.0048) with increased frequencies of ovarian cancer, while women with the IL-8 +781 (C/C) allele suffer from ovarian cancer significantly less frequently (p=0.0003). Furthermore, the IL-8 +2767 (T/T) genotype is also associated with a higher risk of ovarian cancer (p=0.0177). Our results indicate, for the first time, that IL-8 polymorphism is associated with ovarian cancer.

Statement by the Kommission OVAR of the AGO Study Group on the Use of HIPEC (Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy) to Treat Primary and Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

HIPEC is offered to patients with ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer at some hospitals. Altogether, there is still no evidence that HIPEC leads to an improvement of prognosis in any gynecologic tumor, neither in primary therapy nor in treatment of relapse. The available data indicate an increased complication rate which might negatively impact the benefit-risk balance of this procedure. In addition, standard treatment with proven efficacy might be withheld due to application of unproven methods. The use of HIPEC outside of well designed, prospective and controlled clinical trials is therefore disregarded.

Implementation of the quality management system improves postoperative pain treatment: a prospective pre-/post-interventional questionnaire study

Background

An organizational approach is proposed as an immediate solution for improving postoperative pain (POP) management. The aim was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of a quality management system (QMS), based on procedure-specific, multimodal analgesic protocols, modified to meet the individual patients’ requirements.

Methods

Patients from the orthopaedic, gynaecological, visceral, and trauma surgery departments of the university hospital were involved in two prospective surveys. Survey 1 was performed at baseline and survey 2 was performed after the implementation of QMS within an interval of 1 year. The patients were asked to report pain intensity on the visual rating scale, incidence of analgesia-related side-effects, and incidence of pain interference with the items of life quality and their satisfaction with the treatment of POP.

Results

Patients from Survey 2 (n=251) reported 25–30% less pain than those from Survey 1 (n=269) (P<0.0001). Nausea was reported by 40% of the patients from Survey 1 vs 17% from Survey 2, vomiting by 25 vs 11% and fatigue by 76% in Survey 1 vs 30% in Survey 2 (P<0.0001). Life quality and patients’ satisfaction improved in Survey 2 vs Survey 1 (P<0.001).

Conclusions

The implementation of QMS allowed the reduction in POP intensity with a simultaneous decrease in analgesia-related side-effects. This has led to an increased quality of life and patient satisfaction.

Online tumor conference in the clinical management of gynecological cancer: experience from a pilot study in Germany

The concept of the online tumor conference was established in 2004 as a pilot project. We developed specific web-based software to organize and conduct online tumor board meetings of gynecologists, surgeons, radiologists, oncologists, and pathologists from different hospitals and gynecological practitioners, discussing individual patient's cases, defining therapy options, and exchanging clinical experience. Following a didactic approach, patient data are presented to the participants, with a special focus toward patient's preference and late toxicity from prior therapy. Then different national (eg, Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie, Deutsche Gesellschag fur Gynaekologic und Geburtshilfe) and international guidelines (eg, American Society of Clinical Oncology, National Cancer Institute), current study results based on literature review and open clinical trials are discussed. An individual diagnosis and therapy recommendation for each patient is reached by consensus. All protocols, guidelines, and publication data are upgraded and dispersed via Internet for all participants. In the period from December 2004 to August 2006, 39 tumor board conferences were performed with a total of 667 participants. One hundred forty-four patients' cases were presented, and 121 peer-reviewed second-opinions were sought. In an anonymous survey, 84% of the participants reported to be satisfied with the information content and 72% with the technical support. Overall 98% of the individual therapy recommendations were accepted and implemented. The tumor board conference presents an optimal possibility for extensive scientific discussions and exchange (92%) and improves advanced educational training (81%). In conclusion, the online tumor conference is feasible and represents a time-saving possibility for gynecological oncologist to receive a treatment recommendation based on the best available clinical and scientific evidence.

Role of multivisceral cytoreductive surgery in patients (pts) with recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC): Who will not benefit from radical tumor debulking?

16036

Background: Despite improvement in surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy most pts with ovarian cancer (OC) experience a relapse within 2 years after first diagnosis. For primary OC a standard concensus on optimal staging and surgical guidelines is established. The role of radical tumor debulking surgery in ROC is not clearly defined. Aim of this study was to analyze clinical parameters for prediction of operability and impact on overall survival in ROC. Methods: Within the framework of the international project “Tumor bank Ovarian Cancer“ (TOC) a systematic prospective surgical and histomorphological tumor documentation for ROC was performed. Results: Between september 2000 and december 2006, 307 multivisceral operations on 254 pts with ROC were performed consecutively in our department. Median age was 55 years (19–83), median follow-up 15 months (1–75). 34.8% of pts experienced first relapse of OC. Overall, 96.3% of pts received a platinum-based first-line chemotherapy, whereas 73.4% were platinum sensitive. In 55% of pts first relapse surgery was performed. In 41.4% of pts complete macroscopic tumor resection was achieved, associated with a significantly better recurrence-free (median 20.6 vs 13.2, p=0.001) and overall survival (median 42 vs 12 months, p<0.001) compared to pts with any postoperative residual tumor. In multivariate analysis, complete tumor resection was associated with the absence of tumor burden in the upper abdomen (p=0.001) and absence of ascites (p=0.05). Prognostic factors for postoperative survival were: tumor resection (0 cm vs > 0 cm, p<0.001), intraoperative volume of ascites (0 ml vs > 0 ml, p=0.006) and response to platinum-based first-line therapy (platinum sensitive vs platinum-resistant, p=0.006). Conclusions: Radical tumor debulking in patients with ROC is associated with a low postoperative morbidity and mortality. Complete mascroscopic tumor resection is correlated with a significant better long-term prognosis and influenced by tumor spread and presence of ascites. Pts with ROC will not benefit from multivisceral cytoreductive surgery in case of platinum resistance to first-line chemotherapy, presence of intraoperative ascites and postoperative residual tumor.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sequential therapy with carboplatin (C) followed by paclitaxel (P) as first-line chemotherapy in 105 patients with advanced ovarian cancer (AOC): Results of a multicenter phase II study of the Northeastern German Society of Gynecological Oncology

5533

Background: For the adjuvant setting of AOC after primary radical surgery the combination of paclitaxel and platinum in a three weeks schedule has emerged as the current standard. Exposition duration of the drug is important for cell death. In animal model additional anti-angionetic effects of low dose paclitaxel infusion was observed. A sequential schedule of these agents can potentially yield in an improved therapeutic index. Methods: In this multicenter-phase II trial after primary radical surgery 4 cycles of Carboplatin at a dose of AUC 5 (d1/q21d) followed by 12 cycles weekly paclitaxel at a dose of 80mg/m2 (d1/q7d) was applied. All patients with haemoglobin levels < 12mg/dl get primary erythropoietin. No primary use of other growth factors were allowed. Eligibility criteria were: AOC (FIGO IIb-IV), ECOG performance status 0–2, normal organ functions. Results: Between 07/2003 and 05/2005, 105 patients from 27 institutions were enrolled. The median age was 60 years (23–80). FIGO-stages were: II: 11.4%, III: 67.6%, IV: 14.2%. 1,441 cycles were analyzed and in median 16 courses were applied (range 0–16). The incidence of non-hematological toxicities was very low. 25 % of all patients experienced alopecia (grade 1–2). Neurotoxicity and nausea/vomiting (grade III-IV) occurred in no patients. Grade 3–4 hematological toxicity (% of all pts) included: thrombocytopenia (16 %), anemia (3%), leucopenia (22%), neutropenic fever (0%). 96% received erythropoietin. Thromboembolic events (5%) were not increased in patients who received erythropoietin. After a median follow-up interval of 10 months (range: 1–27 months) 20 patients died, the median overall survival is already not reached. The progression free survival is 19 months (range:10–23 months). Conclusions: These results suggest that this sequential regimen using weekly paclitaxel represents an efficacious and well-tolerated regimen. A randomized study comparing this new schedule with the conventional 3-week protocol is warranted. (Supported by Bristol Myers Squibb Germany and Ortho Biotech Germany)

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Edi-3, a new independent prognostic factor in ovarian cancer

10585

Background: Recently, we have identified for the first time a new putative phosphodiesterase named edi-3 that correlates with tumorigenesis in endometrial cancer. In the present study we analyzed the prognostic relevance of edi-3 in ovarian cancer. Methods: Edi-3 mRNA expression was measured by quantitative RT-PCR (TaqMan) in 62 patients with primary ovarian cancer. All patients signed informed consent, approved by the Clinical Review Board and Ethics Committee of the Medical University Berlin, Charité, Germany. The tumor specimens were collected according to the Tumor Bank Ovarian Cancer standard operating procedures. A validated systematic intraoperative documentation tool was used for the detailed documentation of all surgical procedures. Using the multivariate proportional hazard model we analyzed whether edi-3 predicts survival independent from FIGO-stage, grading, postoperative residual disease and histological type. Results: Edi-3 expression is associated with survival in the univariate Cox model (hazards ratio [HR]: 1.488, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.131 - 1.959, P=0.005). Interestingly, edi-3 was also predictive in the multivariate proportional hazard model adjusted for the conventional clinical factors (HR: 1.521, CI: 1.107 - 2.090, P=0.010). Conclusions: Edi-3 is a new independent prognostic factor in primary ovarian cancer with HR=1.5 (P=0.010). Its function, a possible role in inositol phosphate metabolism, will be further explored in a multi-instutional setting.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Role of the progesterone receptor for paclitaxel resistance in primary breast cancer

Paclitaxel plays an important role in the treatment of primary breast cancer. However, a substantial proportion of patients treated with paclitaxel does not appear to derive any benefit from this therapy. We performed a prospective study using tumour cells isolated from 50 primary breast carcinomas. Sensitivity of primary tumour cells to paclitaxel was determined in a clinically relevant range of concentrations (0.85–27.2 μg ml⁻¹ paclitaxel) using an ATP assay. Chemosensitivity data were used to study a possible association with immunohistochemically determined oestrogen and progesterone receptor (ER and PR) status, as well as histopathological parameters. Progesterone receptor (PR) mRNA expression was also determined by quantitative RT–PCR. We observed a clear association of the PR status with chemosensitivity to paclitaxel. Higher levels of immunohistochemically detected PR expression correlated with decreased chemosensitivity (P=0.008). Similarly, high levels of PR mRNA expression were associated with decreased paclitaxel chemosensitivity (P=0.007). Cells from carcinomas with T-stages 3 and 4 were less sensitive compared to stages 1 and 2 (P=0.013). Multiple regression analysis identified PR receptor status and T-stage as independent predictors of paclitaxel chemosensitivity, whereas the ER, N-stage, grading and age were not influential. In conclusion, in vitro sensitivity to paclitaxel was higher for PR-negative compared with PR-positive breast carcinoma cells. Thus, PR status should be considered as a possible factor of influence when designing new trials and chemotherapy protocols.