Droplet and fibril formation of the functional amyloid Orb2

The functional amyloid Orb2 belongs to the cytoplasmic polyadenylation element binding (CPEB) protein family and plays an important role in long-term memory formation in Drosophila. The Orb2 domain structure combines RNA recognition motifs with low-complexity sequences similar to many RNA-binding proteins shown to form protein droplets via liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS) in vivo and in vitro. This similarity suggests that Orb2 might also undergo LLPS. However, cellular Orb2 puncta have very little internal protein mobility, and Orb2 forms fibrils in Drosophila brains that are functionally active indicating that LLPS might not play a role for Orb2. In the present work, we reconcile these two views on Orb2 droplet formation. Using fluorescence microscopy, we show that soluble Orb2 can indeed phase separate into protein droplets. However, fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) data shows that these droplets have either no or only an extremely short-lived liquid phase and appear maturated right after formation. Orb2 fragments that lack the C-terminal RNA-binding domain (RBD) form fibrils out of these droplets. Solid-state NMR shows that these fibrils have well-ordered static domains in addition to the Gln/His-rich fibril core. Further, we find that full-length Orb2B, which is by far the major component of Orb2 fibrils in vivo, does not transition into fibrils but remains in the droplet phase. Together, our data suggest that phase separation might play a role in initiating the formation of functional Orb2 fibrils.

Structural Model of the Proline-Rich Domain of Huntingtin Exon-1 Fibrils

Huntington's disease is a heritable neurodegenerative disease that is caused by a CAG expansion in the first exon of the huntingtin gene. This expansion results in an elongated polyglutamine domain that increases the propensity of huntingtin exon-1 to form cross-β fibrils. Although the polyglutamine domain is important for fibril formation, the dynamic, C-terminal proline-rich domain (PRD) of huntingtin exon-1 makes up a large fraction of the fibril surface. Because potential fibril toxicity has to be mediated by interactions of the fibril surface with its cellular environment, we wanted to model the conformational space adopted by the PRD. We ran 800-ns long molecular dynamics simulations of the PRD using an explicit water model optimized for intrinsically disordered proteins. These simulations accurately predicted our previous solid-state NMR data and newly acquired electron paramagnetic resonance double electron-electron resonance distances, lending confidence in their accuracy. The simulations show that the PRD generally forms an imperfect polyproline (polyP) II helical conformation. The two polyP regions within the PRD stay in a polyP II helix for most of the simulation, whereas occasional kinks in the proline-rich linker region cause an overall bend in the PRD structure. The dihedral angles of the glycine at the end of the second polyP region are very variable, effectively decoupling the highly dynamic 12 C-terminal residues from the rest of the PRD.

Dynamic domains of amyloid fibrils can be site-specifically assigned with proton detected 3D NMR spectroscopy

Several amyloid fibrils have cores framed by highly dynamic, intrinsically disordered, domains that can play important roles for function and toxicity. To study these domains in detail using solid-state NMR spectroscopy, site-specific resonance assignments are required. Although the rapid dynamics of these domains lead to considerable averaging of orientation-dependent NMR interactions and thereby line-narrowing, the proton linewidths observed in these samples is far larger than what is regularly observed in solution. Here, we show that it is nevertheless possible to record 3D HNCO, HNCA, and HNcoCA spectra on these intrinsically disordered domains and to obtain site-specific assignments.

Delayed hard palate repair and speech deficiencies: a cautionary report

In the management of patients with complete palatal clefts early repair of the soft palate (before 1 year of age) and delayed repair of the hard palate (after five or six years of age) has been advocated on the basis that good speech will develop following soft palate closure and that avoidance of trauma to the hard palate will obviate maxillary growth disturbance. In addition, it is said that many of the remaining hard palate fistulas will close spontaneously and that residual hard palate openings will be easy to close. Thirty-two cases treated in this way are reviewed, and a decade of experience with this technique is presented. A majority of cases failed to develop acceptable speech spontaneously. A very high percentage suffered both anterior and posterior air escape and a strikingly high proportion required pharyngeal flaps. Spontaneous complete closure of the hard palate was infrequent. The hard palate openings were not easy to close. The speech deficiencies associated with this technique are clear. The method's possible advantages in relationship to maxillofacial growth remain difficult to prove and were not specifically investigated in this study.