1
|
Veeken LD, Opdam MAA, Verhoef LM, Popa C, van Crevel R, den Broeder AA. Infection incidence, timing and dose dependency in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with rituximab: a retrospective cohort study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2024; 63:1246-1250. [PMID: 37410085 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Revised: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Rituximab (RTX) is a safe and effective treatment for RA. However, there are some concerns about infection risk and preliminary data suggest dose and time dependency. This study aims to determine the infection incidence in a large real-life population of RA patients using RTX, with special focus on (ultra-)low dosing and time since last infusion. METHODS RA patients treated with 1000, 500 or 200 mg RTX per cycle between 2012 and 2021 at the Sint Maartenskliniek were included in a retrospective cohort study. Patient-, disease-, treatment- and infection characteristics were retrieved from electronic health records. Infection incidence rates, dose and time relations with RTX infusion were analysed using mixed-effects Poisson regression. RESULTS Among 490 patients, we identified 819 infections in 1254 patient years. Most infections were mild and respiratory tract infections were most common. Infection incidence rates were 41, 54 and 71 per 100 patient years for doses of 200, 500 and 1000 mg. Incidence rate ratio (IRR) was significantly lower for 200 mg compared with 1000 mg (adjusted IRR 0.35, 95% CI 0.17, 0.72, P = 0.004). In patients receiving 1000 or 500 mg RTX, infections seemed to occur more frequently within the first two months after infusion compared with later on in the treatment cycle, suggesting an association with peak concentration. CONCLUSION Ultra-low dosing (200 mg) of RTX is associated with a lower risk of infections in RA. Future interventions focusing on ultra-low dosing and slow release of RTX (e.g. by subcutaneous administration) may lower infection risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lara D Veeken
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Merel A A Opdam
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Lise M Verhoef
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Calin Popa
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Rheumatology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Reinout van Crevel
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Alfons A den Broeder
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Rheumatology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
den Broeder N, Verhoef L, de Man YA, Kok MR, Thurlings R, van der Weele W, van den Bemt BJ, van den Hoogen FH, van der Maas A, den Broeder AA. Long-term clinical and radiological effectiveness and safety of ultralow doses of rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis: observational extension of the REDO trial. RMD Open 2024; 10:e003659. [PMID: 38599654 PMCID: PMC11015170 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The REDO trial (REtreatment with Rituximab in RhEmatoid arthritis: Disease Outcome after Dose Optimisation) showed similar disease activity for retreatment with ultralow doses (200 mg and 500 mg per 6 months) compared with standard low-dose rituximab (RTX, 1000 mg per 6 months). We performed an observational extension study of the REDO trial to assess long-term effectiveness. METHODS Patients from the REDO trial were followed from start of the trial to censoring in April 2021. RTX use was at the discretion of patient and rheumatologist using treat to target. The primary outcome was disease activity (disease activity score in 28 joints C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP)), analysed using a longitudinal mixed model by original randomisation and time-varying RTX dose. The original DAS28-CRP non-inferiority (NI) margin of 0.6 was used. RTX dose and persistence, safety and radiological outcomes were also assessed. FINDINGS Data from 126 of 142 REDO patients was collected from 15 December 2016, up to 30 April 2021. Drop-outs continued treatment elsewhere (n=3) or did not consent (n=13).Disease activity did not differ by original randomisation group: 1000 mg mean DAS28-CRP (95% CI) of 2.2 (2.0 to 2.5), 500 mg 2.3 (2.1 to 2.4) and 200 mg 2.4 (2.2 to 2.5). Lower time-varying RTX dose was associated with higher DAS28-CRP (0.22 (95% CI 0.05 to 0.40) higher for 200 mg/6 months compared with 1000 mg/6 months), but remained within the NI-margin. RTX persistence was 93%. Median RTX dose was 978 mg (IQR 684-1413) per year, and no association was found between RTX dose and adverse events or radiological damage. INTERPRETATION Long-term use of ultralow doses of RTX is effective in patients with rheumatoid arthritis responding to standard dose RTX.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lise Verhoef
- Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands
| | - Yaël A de Man
- Rheumatology, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Almelo, Netherlands
| | - Marc R Kok
- Rheumatology, Maasstad Ziekenhuis, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Teuwen MMH, van Weely SFE, Vliet Vlieland TPM, van Wissen MAT, Peter WF, den Broeder AA, van Schaardenburg D, van den Hout WB, Van den Ende CHM, Gademan MGJ. Effectiveness of longstanding exercise therapy compared with usual care for people with rheumatoid arthritis and severe functional limitations: a randomised controlled trial. Ann Rheum Dis 2024; 83:437-445. [PMID: 38171602 DOI: 10.1136/ard-2023-224912] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare the effectiveness of longstanding (>52 weeks), supervised exercise therapy with usual care in adults with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and severe functional limitations. METHODS Participants were randomised 1:1 to the intervention (individualised goal-setting, active exercises, education and self-management regarding physical activity) or usual care. Primary endpoint was the change in the Patient-Specific Complaints activity ranked 1 (PSC1, 0-10) at 52 weeks. Secondary endpoints included the PSC activities ranked 2 and 3 (PSC2, PSC3), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Rheumatoid Arthritis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RAQoL), 6-minute walk test (6MWT), Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Physical Function-10 (PROMIS PF-10) and the Short Form-36 Physical and Mental Component Summary Scales (SF-36 PCS and MCS). (Serious) Adverse events (AEs) were recorded. Measurements were done by blinded assessors. Analyses at 52 weeks were based on the intention-to-treat principle. RESULTS In total, 217 people (90% female, age 58.8 (SD 12.9) years) were randomised (n=104 intervention, n=98 usual care available for analyses). At 52 weeks, the improvement of the PSC1 was significantly larger in the intervention group (mean difference (95% CI) -1.7 (-2.4, -1.0)). Except for the SF-36 MCS, all secondary outcomes showed significantly greater improvements favouring the intervention (PSC2 -1.8 (-2.4, -1.1), PSC3 -1.7 (-2.4, -1.0), PROMIS PF-10 +3.09 (1.80, 4.38), HAQ-DI -0.17 (-0.29, -0.06), RAQoL -2.03 (-3.39, -0.69), SF-36 PCS +3.83 (1.49, 6.17) and 6MWT +56 (38, 75) m). One mild, transient AE occurred in the intervention group. CONCLUSION Longstanding, supervised exercise therapy was more effective than usual care in people with RA and severe functional limitations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Netherlands Trial Register (NL8235), included in the International Clinical Trial Registry Platform (https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=NL8235).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max M H Teuwen
- Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Salima F E van Weely
- Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Thea P M Vliet Vlieland
- Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Maria A T van Wissen
- Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Wilfred F Peter
- Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Cornelia H M Van den Ende
- Department of Research, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Rheumatology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Maaike G J Gademan
- Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schapink L, den Broeder N, den Broeder AA, Verhoef LM. Treat-to-target vs fixed interval retreatment strategy with rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis: a retrospective cohort study. Rheumatol Int 2024:10.1007/s00296-023-05524-x. [PMID: 38286887 DOI: 10.1007/s00296-023-05524-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2024]
Abstract
To compare the effectiveness of retreatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with rituximab (RTX) following the treat-to-target retreatment (TTr) or fixed interval retreatment (FIr) strategy. RA patients starting RTX treatment between January 2008 and June 2016, and receiving at least three infusion cycles were grouped by strategy (TTr, FIr or both). Primary outcome (between strategy difference in DAS28-CRP (Disease Activity Score in 28 joints calculated with C-reactive protein)) and secondary outcomes (flares, use of co-medication and mean yearly dose of RTX) were analyzed by group using linear mixed models to account for different strategies within patients. A total of 213 patients, 59 TTr (of whom 32 switched from TTr to FIr) and 186 FIr were included. No between-group difference in mean DAS28-CRP was found (0.10 DAS28-CRP point (95% CI - 0.07 to 0.26)). The TTr strategy did not result in more flares (IRR 1.13, 95%CI 0.87 to 1.47), conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug use (difference - 11.7%, 95%CI - 26.3% to 2.9%), or lower mean yearly RTX dose (difference 172 mg/yr, 95%CI - 355 to 11.7 mg/yr). RTX retreatment with either a TTr or FIr strategy does not seem to lead to better disease control and/or less drug use when used in a DAS28-CRP treat-to-target context. Choice of either strategy can, therefore, be made based on patient and physician preferences and logistical context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Schapink
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Nathan den Broeder
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Alfons A den Broeder
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Rheumatic Diseases, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Lise M Verhoef
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Opdam MAA, Campisi LM, de Leijer JH, Ten Cate D, den Broeder AA. Hypogammaglobulinemia in rheumatoid arthritis patients on rituximab: prevalence and risk factors. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2024; 63:e1-e2. [PMID: 37410082 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Revised: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Merel A A Opdam
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Laura M Campisi
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - J H de Leijer
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - David Ten Cate
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Alfons A den Broeder
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Rheumatology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Teuwen MMH, van Weely SFE, Vliet Vlieland TPM, Douw T, van Schaardenburg D, den Broeder AA, van Tubergen AM, van Wissen MAT, van den Ende CHM, Gademan MGJ. Functional limitations of people with rheumatoid arthritis or axial spondyloarthritis and severe functional disability: a cross-sectional descriptive study. Rheumatol Int 2024; 44:129-143. [PMID: 38006457 PMCID: PMC10766716 DOI: 10.1007/s00296-023-05487-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 11/27/2023]
Abstract
The objective of the study is to describe the nature of functional limitations in activities and participation in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) or axial SpondyloArthritis (axSpA) with severe functional disability. Baseline data from people with RA (n = 206) or axSpA (n = 155) and severe functional disability participating in an exercise trial were used. Their three most limited activities were derived from the Patient Specific Complaint (PSC) instrument and linked to the International Classification of Functioning and Health (ICF). The frequencies of ICF categories were calculated and compared with Activities and Participation items of the ICF Core Sets for RA (32 second-level categories) and Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) (24 second-level categories). In total 618 and 465 PSC activities were linked to 909 (72 unique in total; 25 unique second-level) and 759 (57 unique in total; 23 unique second-level) ICF categories in RA and axSpA. Taking into account all three prioritized activities, the five most frequent limited activities concerned the ICF chapter "Mobility", and included "Walking" (RA and axSpA 2 categories), "Changing basic body position" (RA and axSpA 1 category), "Stair climbing"(RA) and "Grasping" (RA),"Lifting" (axSpA) and "Maintaining a standing position" (axSpA). In RA, 21/32 (66%) and in axSpA 14/24 (58%) unique second-level categories identified in the prioritized activities are present in the Comprehensive Core Sets. Most limitations of people with RA or axSpA and severe functional disability were seen in the ICF chapter "Mobility". Most of the identified ICF categories were covered by the corresponding items of the ICF RA and AS Core Sets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max M H Teuwen
- Department of Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Albinusdreef 2, P.O.Box 9600, 2300, RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - Salima F E van Weely
- Department of Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Albinusdreef 2, P.O.Box 9600, 2300, RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Thea P M Vliet Vlieland
- Department of Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Albinusdreef 2, P.O.Box 9600, 2300, RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Thom Douw
- University of Applied Sciences Leiden, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Dirkjan van Schaardenburg
- Department of Rheumatology, Center for Rehabilitation and Rheumatology, Reade, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Astrid M van Tubergen
- Department of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Maria A T van Wissen
- Department of Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Albinusdreef 2, P.O.Box 9600, 2300, RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelia H M van den Ende
- Department of Rheumatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Research, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Maaike G J Gademan
- Department of Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Albinusdreef 2, P.O.Box 9600, 2300, RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Popa CD, Opdam MAA, den Broeder N, van Ballegooijen H, Mulder K, van de Wiel KM, van Herwaarden N, Wientjes MHM, den Broeder AA. Therapy with JAK inhibitors or bDMARDs and the risk of cardiovascular events in the Dutch rheumatoid arthritis population. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2023:kead531. [PMID: 37796830 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2023] [Revised: 08/27/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Caution has been advocated recently when using Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with an unfavorable cardiovascular risk profile. We aimed to compare the incidences in cardiovascular events between JAKi or bDMARDs in a large population of RA patients. METHODS RA patients starting a new bDMARD or JAKi between August 1st 2018 and January 31st 2022 have been selected from IQVIA's Dutch Real-World Data Longitudinal Prescription database, covering about 63% of outpatient prescriptions in the Netherlands. Study outcome was a cardiovascular event, defined as the start of platelet aggregation inhibitors during study period. The incidence densities of cardiovascular events were compared between JAKi and bDMARDs using multilevel Poisson regression, adjusted for exposition time and confounders. RESULTS 15 191 unique patients were included, with 28 481 patient-years on treatment with either JAKi (2,373) or bDMARDs (26 108). Most patients were female (72%) and median age was 62 years. We found 36 cardiovascular events (1.52 events/100 patient years) during therapy with JAKi and 383 events (1.47 events/100 patient years) during therapy with bDMARDs, respectively, resulting in an adjusted incidence rate ratio (IRR) of 0.99 for JAKi compared with bDMARDs (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.70-1.41). Sub-analyses in patients >65 years, by sex, or separately for tofacitinib and baricitinib, yielded similar results. CONCLUSION In a large Dutch general RA population, the risk of cardiovascular events seems not different between JAKi users and those using bDMARDs, although a small increase in higher risk patients cannot be excluded.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Calin D Popa
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Rheumatology, Radboudumc Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Merel A A Opdam
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Nathan den Broeder
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | - Maike H M Wientjes
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
den Broeder N, den Broeder AA, Verhoef LM, van den Hoogen FHJ, van der Maas A, van den Bemt BJF. Non-Medical Switching from Tocilizumab to Sarilumab in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients with Low Disease Activity, an Observational Study. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2023; 114:810-814. [PMID: 37429827 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.2999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 07/12/2023]
Abstract
Tocilizumab and sarilumab are IL-6-receptor antagonists registered for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), with equal effectiveness and safety. Switching from tocilizumab to sarilumab could be a strategy to reduce injection burden, in case of drug shortages, and to reduce costs. This study therefore aims to investigate the effectiveness and safety of switching patients with RA with well-controlled disease under tocilizumab treatment to sarilumab. Patients with RA with low Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28;-CRP < 2.9 or < 3.5 with clinical judgment), on stable dose tocilizumab (> 6 months) were offered to switch to sarilumab. Patients who switched and consented were followed for 6 months. Sarilumab was started at 200 mg and double the last tocilizumab interval. Co-primary outcomes at 6 months were (i) the 90% confidence interval (CI) of DAS28-CRP change from baseline compared with the non-inferiority margin of 0.6 and (ii) the 90% CI of the proportion of patients persisting with sarilumab, compared with a prespecified minimum of 70%. Of 50 invited patients, 25 agreed to switch to sarilumab, and 23 patients switched and were included. One patient was lost to follow-up immediately after inclusion, therefore 22 patients are included in the analyses. At 6 months, mean change in DAS28-CRP was 0.48 (90% CI: 0.11-0.87), compared with the non-inferiority margin of 0.6. Sarilumab persistence was 68% (90% CI: 51-82%, 15 out of 22 patients), compared with the prespecified minimum of 70%. Non-medical switching from tocilizumab to sarilumab in patients doing well on tocilizumab failed to show non-inferiority regarding disease activity and drug persistence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan den Broeder
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Lise M Verhoef
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Aatke van der Maas
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wientjes MHM, Ulijn E, Kievit W, Landewé RBM, Meek I, den Broeder N, van Herwaarden N, van den Bemt BJF, Verhoef LM, den Broeder AA. The added value of predictive biomarkers in treat-to-target strategies for rheumatoid arthritis patients: a conceptual modelling study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2023; 62:2700-2706. [PMID: 36538875 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 08/03/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To quantify the additional value of a hypothetical biomarker predicting response to treatment for RA regarding efficacy and costs by using a modelling design. METHODS A Markov model was built comparing a usual care T2T strategy with a biomarker-steered strategy for RA patients starting biologic therapy. Outcome measures include time spent in remission or low disease activity (LDA) and costs. Four additional scenario analyses were performed by varying biomarker or clinical care characteristics: (i) costs of the biomarker; (ii) sensitivity and specificity of the biomarker; (iii) proportion of eligible patients tapering; and (iv) medication costs. RESULTS In the base model, patients spent 2.9 months extra in LDA or remission in the biomarker strategy compared with usual care T2T over 48 months. Total costs were €43 301 and €42 568 for, respectively, the usual care and biomarker strategy, and treatment costs accounted for 91% of total costs in both scenarios. Cost savings were driven due to patients in the biomarker strategy experiencing remission or LDA earlier, and starting tapering sooner. Cost-effectiveness was not so much driven by costs or test characteristics of the biomarker (scenario 1/2), but rather by the level of early and proactive tapering and drug costs (scenarios 3/4). CONCLUSIONS The use of a biomarker for prediction of response to b/tsDMARD treatment in RA can be of added value to current treat-to-target clinical care. However, gains in efficacy are modest and cost gains are depending on a combination of early proactive tapering and high medication costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maike H M Wientjes
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Evy Ulijn
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Wietske Kievit
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Robert B M Landewé
- Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Rheumatology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Inger Meek
- Department of Rheumatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Nathan den Broeder
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Noortje van Herwaarden
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Pharmacology-Toxicology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Bart J F van den Bemt
- Department of Pharmacy, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Lise M Verhoef
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Alfons A den Broeder
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Rheumatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Peeters IR, den Broeder AA, Taylor WJ, den Broeder N, Flendrie M, van Herwaarden N. Urate-lowering therapy following a treat-to-target continuation strategy compared to a treat-to-avoid-symptoms discontinuation strategy in gout patients in remission (GO TEST Finale): study protocol of a multicentre pragmatic randomized superiority trial. Trials 2023; 24:282. [PMID: 37072799 PMCID: PMC10114395 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07242-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 04/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Long-term gout treatment is based on reducing serum urate levels using urate-lowering therapy (ULT). Most guidelines recommend using a lifelong continuation treat-to-target (T2T) strategy, in which ULT is dosed or combined until a serum urate target has been reached and maintained. However, a frequently used alternative strategy in clinical practice is a treat-to-avoid-symptoms (T2S) ULT discontinuation strategy, with the possibility of restarting the medication. This latter strategy aims at an acceptable symptom state, regardless of serum urate levels. High-quality evidence to support either strategy for patients in prolonged remission while using ULT is lacking. METHODS We developed an investigator-driven pragmatic, open-label, multicentre, randomized, superiority treatment strategy trial (GO TEST Finale). At least 278 gout patients using ULT who are in remission (>12 months, preliminary gout remission criteria) will be randomized 1:1 to a continued T2T strategy (treatment target serum urate < 0.36 mmol/l) or switched to a T2S discontinuation strategy in which ULT is tapered to stop and restarted in case of (persistent or recurrent) flaring. The primary outcome is the between-group difference in the proportion of patients not in remission during the last 6 months of 24 months follow-up and will be analyzed using a two proportion z test. Secondary outcomes are group differences in gout flare incidence, reintroduction or adaptation of ULT, use of anti-inflammatory drugs, serum urate changes, occurrence of adverse events (with a special interest in cardiovascular and renal events), and cost-effectiveness. DISCUSSION This study will be the first clinical trial comparing two ULT treatment strategies in patients with gout in remission. It will contribute to more specific and unambiguous guideline recommendations and improved cost-effectiveness of long-term gout treatment. It also paves the way (exploratory) to individualized long-term ULT treatment. In this article, we elaborate on some of our trial design choices and their clinical and methodological consequences. TRIAL REGISTRATION International Clinical Trial Registry Platform (ICTRP) NL9245. Registered on 2 February 2021 (METC Oost-Nederland NL74350.091.20); EudraCT EUCTR2020-005730-15-NL. Registered on 11 January 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iris Rose Peeters
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, the Netherlands.
- Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Alfons A den Broeder
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, the Netherlands
- Department of Rheumatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - William J Taylor
- Department of Medicine, University of Otago Wellington, Newtown, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Nathan den Broeder
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, the Netherlands
- Radboud Institute of Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Marcel Flendrie
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, the Netherlands
| | - Noortje van Herwaarden
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, the Netherlands
- Department of Pharmacology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bolhuis TE, Marsman DE, den Broeder AA, den Broeder N, van der Maas A. 1-year results of treatment with rituximab in polymyalgia rheumatica: an extension study of a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Rheumatol 2023; 5:e208-e214. [PMID: 38251523 DOI: 10.1016/s2665-9913(23)00032-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Revised: 01/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rituximab was effective for patients with polymyalgia rheumatica in the 21-week BRIDGE-PMR randomised controlled trial. Here, we aimed to assess rates of glucocorticoid-free remission up to 1 year after infusion in an extension of this trial. METHODS BRIDGE-PMR was a randomised controlled proof-of-concept trial that enrolled participants with polymyalgia rheumatica according to 2012 European League Against Rheumatism-American College of Rheumatology classification criteria at the Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, Netherlands. Patients were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive one intravenous dose of 1000 mg rituximab or placebo, with identical pre-medication and accelerated glucocorticoid tapering over 17 weeks. After the 21-week study, patients were followed in a double-blind extension until 1 year after infusion during which standard-of-care treatment was provided. The primary outcome after 52 weeks was between-group difference in glucocorticoid-free remission (ie, polymyalgia rheumatica activity score [PMR-AS] <10), assessed in all randomly allocated participants, with data imputed using a predictive mean matching model (provided data were missing at random). A sensitivity analysis restricted to patients with complete data (complete case analysis) was also done. This trial is registered with EudraCT (2018-002641-11) and the Dutch trial database (NL7414). FINDINGS Between Dec 18, 2019 and June 8, 2021, 47 patients enrolled in the BRIDGE-PMR were followed up in this extension study (23 [11 women and 12 men] allocated rituximab and 24 [13 women and 11 men] allocated placebo), of who 38 had recently diagnosed polymyalgia rheumatica and nine had relapsing polymyalgia rheumatica. Mean (SD) age was 64 (10) years in the rituximab group and 66 (9) years in the placebo group. All participants were White. Missing data were imputed for six participants (four rituximab, two placebo); because the data were probably missing at random, a complete case analysis was added as sensitivity analyses. In the imputed analysis, the between-group absolute difference reached statistical significance (12 [52%] of 23 in the rituximab group in glucocorticoid-free remission vs five [21%] of 24 participants in the placebo group; absolute difference 31% [95% CI 5 to 57], RR 2·5 [1·0 to 6·0]; p=0·04). In the complete case analysis, nine (47%) of 19 patients in the rituximab group were in glucocorticoid-free remission 1 year after infusion compared with five (23%) of 22 in the placebo group (absolute difference 25% [95% CI -4 to 53], relative risk (RR) 2·1 [95% CI 0·8 to 5·2]; p=0·12). Eight (33%) patients in the placebo group and six (26%) in the rituximab group had adverse events. INTERPRETATION After a single dose of rituximab (1000 mg), the proportion of patients with polymyalgia rheumatica in glucocorticoid-free remission remained stable at 1 year after infusion, and a glucocorticoid sparing effect was evident. A larger trial including possibility for retreatment is warranted to confirm these results. FUNDING Sint Maartenskliniek.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas E Bolhuis
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, Netherlands; Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Diane E Marsman
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, Netherlands
| | - Alfons A den Broeder
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, Netherlands; Department of Rheumatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Nathan den Broeder
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, Netherlands; Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Aatke van der Maas
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Eektimmerman F, Swen JJ, den Broeder AA, Hazes JMW, Kurreeman FS, Verstappen SMM, Nair N, Pawlik A, Nurmohamed MT, Dolžan V, Böhringer S, Allaart CF, Guchelaar HJ. Genome-wide Association Study of Methotrexate-Induced Liver Injury in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2023; 113:916-923. [PMID: 36708065 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.2858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2022] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
Hepatotoxicity is a serious adverse drug reaction related to methotrexate (MTX). However, the cause of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is still unclear and unpredictable. Genetic risk factors may predispose for MTX-DILI. Therefore, we conducted a nested case-control genome-wide association study to explore genetic risk factors associated with MTX-DILI. Seven international groups contributed blood samples and data of patients with rheumatoid arthritis who used MTX. MTX-DILI was defined as an alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level of at least three times the upper limit of normal (ULN), to increase contrast controls ALT levels did not raise above two times the ULN. Per study site, control subjects and patients with MTX-DILI (ratio 3:1) were matched for age, gender, and duration of MTX use. Patients were genotyped using Illumina GSA MD-24v1-0 and data were imputed using the 1000 Genomes reference panel. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were analyzed using an additive genetic model, corrected for sex, country, and age. A P-value of ≤ 5 × 10-8 was considered significant, whereas a P-value of ≤ 5 × 10-6 was considered suggestive. A total of 108 MTX-DILI cases and 311 controls were included for association analysis. None of the SNPs were significantly associated with MTX-DILI. However, we found seven suggestive genetic variants associated with MTX-DILI (P-values 7.43 × 10-8 to 4.86 × 10-6 ). Of those, five SNPs were in the intronic protein-coding regions of FTCDNL1, BCOR, FGF14, RBMS3, and PFDN4/DOK5. Investigation of candidates SPATA9 (rs72783407), PLCG2 (rs60427389), RAVER2 (rs72675408), JAK1 (rs72675451), PTPN2 (rs2476601), MTHFR C677T (rs1801133), and into the HLA region did not show significant findings. No genetic variants associated with MTX-DILI were found, whereas suggestive SNPs need further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank Eektimmerman
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jesse J Swen
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Alfons A den Broeder
- Department of Rheumatology, Radboudumc and Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Johanna M W Hazes
- Department of Rheumatology, ErasmusMC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Fina S Kurreeman
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Suzanne M M Verstappen
- Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Nisha Nair
- NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.,Division of Musculoskeletal Sciences, Centre for Genetics and Genomics Versus Arthritis, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Andrzej Pawlik
- Department of Physiology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Mike T Nurmohamed
- Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Vita Dolžan
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Stefan Böhringer
- Department of Medical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelia F Allaart
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Henk-Jan Guchelaar
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Messelink MA, den Broeder AA, Marinelli FE, Michgels E, Verschueren P, Aletaha D, Tekstra J, Welsing PMJ. What is the best target in a treat-to-target strategy in rheumatoid arthritis? Results from a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. RMD Open 2023; 9:rmdopen-2023-003196. [PMID: 37116986 PMCID: PMC10152050 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Accepted: 04/09/2023] [Indexed: 04/30/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES A treat-to-target (T2T) strategy has been shown to be superior to usual care in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but the optimal target remains unknown. Targets are based on a disease activity measure (eg, Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS28), Simplified Disease Activity Indices/Clinical Disease Activity Indices (SDAI/CDAI), and a cut-off such as remission or low disease activity (LDA). Our aim was to compare the effect of different targets on clinical and radiographic outcomes. METHODS Cochrane, Embase and (pre)MEDLINE databases were searched (1 June 2022) for randomised controlled trials and cohort studies after 2003 that applied T2T in RA patients for ≥12 months. Data were extracted from individual T2T study arms; risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane Collaboration tool. Using meta-regression, we evaluated the effect of the target used on clinical and radiographic outcomes, correcting for heterogeneity between and within studies. RESULTS 115 treatment arms were used in the meta-regression analyses. Aiming for SDAI/CDAI-LDA was statistically superior to targeting DAS-LDA regarding DAS-remission and SDAI/CDAI/Boolean-remission outcomes over 1-3 years. Aiming for SDAI/CDAI-LDA was also significantly superior to DAS-remission regarding both SDAI/CDAI/Boolean-remission (over 1-3 years) and mean SDAI/CDAI (over 1 year). Targeting DAS-remission rather than DAS-LDA only improved the percentage of patients in DAS-remission, and only statistically significantly after 2-3 years of T2T. No differences were observed in Health Assessment Questionnaire and radiographic progression. CONCLUSIONS Targeting SDAI/CDAI-LDA, and to a lesser extent DAS-remission, may be superior to targeting DAS-LDA regarding several clinical outcomes. However, due to the risk of residual confounding and the lack of data on (over)treatment and safety, future studies should aim to directly and comprehensively compare targets. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42021249015.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Edwin Michgels
- Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - P Verschueren
- Rheumatology, KU Leuven University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Daniel Aletaha
- Department of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Janneke Tekstra
- Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Paco M J Welsing
- Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
den Broeder AA, van Herwaarden N, Wientjes MHM. [Methotrexate to prevent progression to rheumatoid arthritis?]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2023; 167. [PMID: 36920291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/16/2023]
Abstract
The TREAT EARLIER was aimed at testing whether methotrexate could prevent the evolution from clinically suspect arthralgia to Rheumatoid Arthritis. Although the primary outcome was negative, symptoms did improve during and after use of methotrexate. Here we discuss how to interpret these findings, and place the study in the existing evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alfons A den Broeder
- Sint Maartenskliniek, afd. Reumatologie, Nijmegen.,Contact: Alfons A. den Broeder
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
van der Togt CJT, Van den Bemt B, Aletaha D, Alten R, Chatzidionysiou K, Galloway J, Isaac J, Mulleman D, Verschueren P, Vulto AG, Welsing PMJ, Verhoef L, den Broeder AA. Points to consider for cost-effective use of biological and targeted synthetic DMARDs in inflammatory rheumatic diseases: results from an umbrella review and international Delphi study. RMD Open 2023; 9:rmdopen-2022-002898. [PMID: 36863753 PMCID: PMC9990692 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002898] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2023] [Indexed: 03/04/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To develop evidence-based points to consider for cost-effective use of biological and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) in the treatment of inflammatory rheumatic diseases, specifically rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis. METHODS Following EULAR procedures, an international task force was formed, consisting of 13 experts in rheumatology, epidemiology and pharmacology from seven European countries. Twelve strategies for cost-effective use of b/tsDMARDs were identified through individual and group discussion. For each strategy, PubMed and Embase were systematically searched for relevant English-language systematic reviews and, for six strategies, additionally for randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Thirty systematic reviews and 21 RCTs were included. Based on the evidence, a set of overarching principles and points to consider was formulated by the task force using a Delphi procedure. Level of evidence (1a-5) and grade (A-D) were determined for each point to consider. Individual voting on the level of agreement (LoA; between 0 (completely disagree) and 10 (completely agree)) was performed anonymously. RESULTS The task force agreed on five overarching principles. For 10 of 12 strategies, the evidence was sufficient to formulate one or more points to consider, leading to 20 in total, regarding response prediction, drug formulary use, biosimilars, loading doses, low-dose initial therapy, concomitant conventional synthetic DMARD use, route of administration, medication adherence, disease activity-guided dose optimisation and non-medical drug switching. Ten points to consider (50%) were supported by level 1 or 2 evidence. The mean LoA (SD) varied between 7.9 (1.2) and 9.8 (0.4). CONCLUSION These points to consider can be used in rheumatology practices and complement inflammatory rheumatic disease treatment guidelines to incorporate cost-effectiveness in b/tsDMARD treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Céleste J T van der Togt
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands .,Department of Rheumatology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Bart Van den Bemt
- Department of Pharmacy, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Pharmacy, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Daniel Aletaha
- Department of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
| | - Rieke Alten
- Internal Medicine, Rheumatology, Schlosspark-Klinik GmbH, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - James Galloway
- Department of Rheumatology, King's College London, London, UK
| | - John Isaac
- Department of Rheumatology, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Denis Mulleman
- Department of Rheumatology, University of Tours, Tours, France.,Service de Rhumatologie, CHRU Tours, Tours, France
| | - P Verschueren
- Rheumatology, KU Leuven University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Arnold G Vulto
- Department of Pharmacy, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Paco M J Welsing
- Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Lise Verhoef
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Opdam MAA, Vriezekolk JE, Broen J, den Broeder AA, Verhoef LM. Exploring the perspective of patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases and care providers on the use of immunomodulatory drugs in infections: an interview study. Rheumatol Adv Pract 2023; 7:rkad003. [PMID: 36685994 PMCID: PMC9853320 DOI: 10.1093/rap/rkad003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2022] [Accepted: 12/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives Immunomodulatory agents are safe and effective as treatment for various immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs), but are associated with a slightly increased infection risk. It is uncertain whether, in the event of an infection, continuation or temporary interruption of immunomodulatory agents leads to better outcomes. Owing to this uncertainty, it is of importance to explore the perspectives of health-care providers (HCPs) and patients on this topic. In this study, we set out to identify and provide an overview of reasons for both treatment strategies. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with HCPs involved in the pharmacological treatment of IMIDs and with IMID patients using one or more immunomodulatory agent. Purposive sampling was used to enrich data variation. Interviews were conducted until data saturation was reached and subsequently analysed using qualitative content analysis. Results In total, 13 HCPs and 19 IMID patients were interviewed. A wide range of reasons for both treatment strategies were identified, categorized into 10 overarching themes, including IMID characteristics, infection characteristics and the patient-HCP relationship. Conclusion In this interview study, we identified various reasons for continuation or temporary interruption of immunomodulatory agents during infections for both IMID patients and HCPs. We found overlapping themes, such as IMID characteristics; however, the content and interpretation of these themes might differ between HCPs and patients. Both HCPs and patients mentioned that the decision for a treatment strategy is often about weighing benefits against risks (e.g. infection severity vs disease flare).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Merel A A Opdam
- Correspondence to: Merel A. A. Opdam, Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Antwoordnummer 2237, 6500 WC Nijmegen, The Netherlands. E-mail:
| | - Johanna E Vriezekolk
- Department of Research and Innovation, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - J Broen
- Regional Rheumatology Centre, Máxima Medical Centre, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Alfons A den Broeder
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands,Department of Rheumatology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Lise M Verhoef
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Smolen JS, Landewé RBM, Bergstra SA, Kerschbaumer A, Sepriano A, Aletaha D, Caporali R, Edwards CJ, Hyrich KL, Pope JE, de Souza S, Stamm TA, Takeuchi T, Verschueren P, Winthrop KL, Balsa A, Bathon JM, Buch MH, Burmester GR, Buttgereit F, Cardiel MH, Chatzidionysiou K, Codreanu C, Cutolo M, den Broeder AA, El Aoufy K, Finckh A, Fonseca JE, Gottenberg JE, Haavardsholm EA, Iagnocco A, Lauper K, Li Z, McInnes IB, Mysler EF, Nash P, Poor G, Ristic GG, Rivellese F, Rubbert-Roth A, Schulze-Koops H, Stoilov N, Strangfeld A, van der Helm-van Mil A, van Duuren E, Vliet Vlieland TPM, Westhovens R, van der Heijde D. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2022 update. Ann Rheum Dis 2023; 82:3-18. [PMID: 36357155 DOI: 10.1136/ard-2022-223356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 289] [Impact Index Per Article: 289.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 10/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To provide an update of the EULAR rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management recommendations addressing the most recent developments in the field. METHODS An international task force was formed and solicited three systematic literature research activities on safety and efficacy of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and glucocorticoids (GCs). The new evidence was discussed in light of the last update from 2019. A predefined voting process was applied to each overarching principle and recommendation. Levels of evidence and strengths of recommendation were assigned to and participants finally voted on the level of agreement with each item. RESULTS The task force agreed on 5 overarching principles and 11 recommendations concerning use of conventional synthetic (cs) DMARDs (methotrexate (MTX), leflunomide, sulfasalazine); GCs; biological (b) DMARDs (tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab including biosimilars), abatacept, rituximab, tocilizumab, sarilumab and targeted synthetic (ts) DMARDs, namely the Janus kinase inhibitors tofacitinib, baricitinib, filgotinib, upadacitinib. Guidance on monotherapy, combination therapy, treatment strategies (treat-to-target) and tapering in sustained clinical remission is provided. Safety aspects, including risk of major cardiovascular events (MACEs) and malignancies, costs and sequencing of b/tsDMARDs were all considered. Initially, MTX plus GCs is recommended and on insufficient response to this therapy within 3-6 months, treatment should be based on stratification according to risk factors; With poor prognostic factors (presence of autoantibodies, high disease activity, early erosions or failure of two csDMARDs), any bDMARD should be added to the csDMARD; after careful consideration of risks of MACEs, malignancies and/or thromboembolic events tsDMARDs may also be considered in this phase. If the first bDMARD (or tsDMARD) fails, any other bDMARD (from another or the same class) or tsDMARD (considering risks) is recommended. With sustained remission, DMARDs may be tapered but should not be stopped. Levels of evidence and levels of agreement were high for most recommendations. CONCLUSIONS These updated EULAR recommendations provide consensus on RA management including safety, effectiveness and cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josef S Smolen
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Robert B M Landewé
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center & Zuyderland Medical Center Heerlen, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Sytske Anne Bergstra
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Andreas Kerschbaumer
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Daniel Aletaha
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Roberto Caporali
- Milan & Department of Rheumatology, ASST PINI-CTO, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Christopher John Edwards
- MSK Research Unit, NIHR Southampton Clinical Research Facility, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Kimme L Hyrich
- Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre and NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre. Manchester University NHS Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Janet E Pope
- Western University, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Savia de Souza
- EULAR Patient Research Partner Network, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Tanja A Stamm
- Section for Outcomes Research, Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Tsutomu Takeuchi
- Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo and Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | | | | | - Alejandro Balsa
- Servicio de Reumatologia, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Joan M Bathon
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center/New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Maya H Buch
- Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Division of Musculoskeletal & Dermatological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health and NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Gerd R Burmester
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - Frank Buttgereit
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Katerina Chatzidionysiou
- Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Rheumatology Division, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Catalin Codreanu
- Center for Rheumatic Diseases, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Maurizio Cutolo
- Laboratory of Experimental Rheumatology and Division of Rheumatology DiMI, Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, University of Genova IRCCS, San Martino Polyclinic Hospital, Genoa, Italy
| | | | - Khadija El Aoufy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Axel Finckh
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals & Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - João Eurico Fonseca
- Rheumatology Department, Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Lisbon Academic Medical Center, and Instituto de Medicina Molecular João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | - Espen A Haavardsholm
- Center for treatment of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases (REMEDY), Diakonhjemmet Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Annamaria Iagnocco
- Academic Rheumatology Centre - AO Mauriziano Torino, Cattedra di Reumatologia - Dipartimento Scienze Cliniche e Biologiche, Università degli Studi di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Kim Lauper
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals & Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Zhanguo Li
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Iain B McInnes
- College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Peter Nash
- School of Medicine, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Gyula Poor
- National Institute of Musculoskeletal Disorders, Semmelweis University Medical School, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Gorica G Ristic
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology and Medical Faculty of the Military Medical Academy, The University of Defense in Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Felice Rivellese
- Centre for Experimental Medicine and Rheumatology, William Harvey Research Institute, London, UK
| | - Andrea Rubbert-Roth
- Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Hendrik Schulze-Koops
- Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine IV, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Nikolay Stoilov
- Department of Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital "St. Ivan Rilski", Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Anja Strangfeld
- Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Rheumatology Division, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Programme Area of Epidemiology and Health Services Research, German Rheumatism Research Centre, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Elsa van Duuren
- The Sefako Makgatho Health Science University, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Theodora P M Vliet Vlieland
- Department of Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - René Westhovens
- Department of Rheumatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Opdam MAA, de Leijer JH, den Broeder N, Thurlings RM, van der Weele W, Nurmohamed MT, Kok MR, van Bon L, Ten Cate DF, Verhoef LM, den Broeder AA. Rituximab dose-dependent infection risk in rheumatoid arthritis is not mediated through circulating immunoglobulins, neutrophils or B cells. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2022; 62:330-334. [PMID: 35686851 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Revised: 05/20/2022] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Rituximab (RTX) is a safe and effective treatment for RA. A dose-dependent infection risk was found in the REDO trial. Some studies associate RTX use with higher infection risks, possibly explained by low immunoglobulin levels and/or neutropenia. Additionally, a higher infection risk shortly after RTX infusion is reported. The objectives of this study were (i) to compare incidence rates of infections between doses and over time, and (ii) to assess B-cell counts, immunoglobulin levels, neutrophil counts and corticosteroid/disease modifying rheumatic drug use as mediating factors between RTX study dose and infection risk. METHODS Post hoc analyses of the REDO trial were performed. Infection incidence rates between RTX dosing groups and between time periods were compared using Poisson regression. A step-wise mediation analysis was performed to investigate if any of the factors mentioned above act as a mediator in the observed dose-dependent difference in infection risk. RESULTS The potential mediators that were investigated (circulating B-cell counts, immunoglobulin levels, neutrophil counts and drug use) did not explain the dose-dependent infection risk observed in the REDO trial. Additionally, a trend towards a time-dependent infection risk was found, with higher infection rates shortly after RTX infusion. CONCLUSIONS These secondary analyses of the REDO trial confirmed the observed dose-dependent infection risk. Additionally, we found that infection risks were higher shortly after RTX infusion. However, a mediating pathway was not found.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Merel A A Opdam
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek.,Department of Rheumatology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboudumc
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Marc R Kok
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, Maasstad Ziekenhuis, Rotterdam
| | - Lenny van Bon
- Department of Rheumatology, Hospital Group Twente, Almelo, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Alfons A den Broeder
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek.,Department of Rheumatic Diseases, Radboudumc, Nijmegen
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
van der Togt CJ, Verhoef LM, van den Bemt BJ, den Broeder N, ter Heine R, den Broeder AA. Pharmacokinetic boosting to enable a once-daily reduced dose of tofacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis (the PRACTICAL study). Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis 2022; 14:1759720X221142277. [PMCID: PMC9749037 DOI: 10.1177/1759720x221142277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Tofacitinib is a Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitor used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), dosed as 5 mg twice daily (BID). It is primarily metabolized by the cytochrome P-3A (CYP3A) enzyme, and therefore, the manufacturer recommends to halve the dose when using CYP3A-inhibiting co-medication. Combining half-dose tofacitinib with a registered CYP3A inhibitor (cobicistat) could reduce costs and improve patient experience. Objectives: Primary: bioequivalence of tofacitinib 5 mg combined with cobicistat once daily (QD; intervention) to tofacitinib 5 mg BID (control). Secondary: safety, patient preference (7-point Likert scale at study end) and predicted differences in disease activity (DAS28-CRP and probability of ACR20 response) using a validated exposure-response model. Design: Open-label, cross-over pharmacokinetic study. Methods: We included patients with RA or PsA, treated with tofacitinib 5 mg BID for ⩾14 days without co-medication affected by CYP3A inhibition. Pharmacokinetic sampling was performed at baseline and after 2–6 weeks of intervention treatment. Bioequivalence was defined as 90% CI of the average tofacitinib concentration (Cavg,ss; intervention to control) falling between 80% and 125%, assessed by non-linear mixed-effects modelling. Results: Between 16 September 2019 and 15 January 2021, 30 patients were included, of whom 25 completed both PK measurements. The tofacitinib Cavg,ss was 85% (90% CI: 75–96%). No serious adverse events occurred. Patient preference was 56% for intervention versus 18% for control. No relevant differences in median predicted disease activity were found (DAS28-CRP: 0.03, 95% CI: −0.16 to 0.22; ACR20: −0.01, −0.07 to 0.05). Conclusion: Due to slightly lower tofacitinib concentrations during intervention treatment, pharmacokinetic bioequivalence could not formally be established. However, pharmacokinetic boosting may be an attractive strategy for cost reduction of tofacitinib because of its safety, similar predicted pharmacodynamics and patient preference. Registration: This study was registered on 29 May 2019 in the Netherlands Trial Register (register number: NL7766).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Bart J.F. van den Bemt
- Department of Pharmacy, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, The Netherlands,Department of Pharmacy, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Nathan den Broeder
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands,Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, The Netherlands
| | - Rob ter Heine
- Department of Pharmacy, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Alfons A. den Broeder
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, The Netherlands,Department of Rheumatic Diseases, Radboudumc, Ubbergen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Wientjes MHM, den Broeder AA, Welsing PMJ, Verhoef LM, van den Bemt BJF. Prediction of response to anti-TNF treatment using laboratory biomarkers in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review. RMD Open 2022; 8:rmdopen-2022-002570. [PMID: 36597975 PMCID: PMC9730399 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In this systematic review, we aim to identify laboratory biomarkers that predict response to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS EMBASE, PubMed and Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) were searched for studies that presented predictive accuracy measures of laboratory biomarkers, or in which these were calculable. Likelihood ratios were calculated in order to determine whether a test result relevantly changed the probability of response. Likelihood ratios between 2-10 and 0.5-0.1 were considered weak predictors, respectively, and ratios above 10 or below 0.1 were considered strong predictors of response. Primary focus was on biomarkers studied ≥3 times. RESULTS From 41 included studies, data on 99 different biomarkers were extracted. Five biomarkers were studied ≥3 times, being (1) anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP), (2) rheumatoid factor, (3) -308 polymorphism in the TNF-α gene, (4) SE copies in the HLA-DRB1 gene and (5) FcGR2A polymorphism. No studies showed a strong predictive association and only one study on anti-CCP showed a weak positive association. CONCLUSIONS No biomarkers were found that consistently showed a (strong) predictive effect for response to TNFi in patients with RA. Given the disappointing yield of previous predictive biomarker research, future studies should focus on exploring, combining and validating the most promising laboratory biomarkers identified in this review, and searching for new predictors. Besides this, they should focus on contexts where prediction-aided decision-making can have a large impact (even with limited predictive value of markers/models). PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42021278987.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maike H M Wientjes
- Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, The Netherlands,Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Alfons A den Broeder
- Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, The Netherlands,Rheumatology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Paco M J Welsing
- Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Lise M Verhoef
- Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, The Netherlands
| | - Bart J F van den Bemt
- Pharmacy, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands,Pharmacy, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Damen MJ, den Broeder AA, Voermans NC, Tieleman AA. Commentary: Autoimmune diseases in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 2. Front Neurol 2022; 13:1041437. [PMID: 36468046 PMCID: PMC9713809 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1041437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 08/31/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Manon J. Damen
- Department of Neurology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
- Department of Neurology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| | | | - Nicol C. Voermans
- Department of Neurology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Alide A. Tieleman
- Department of Neurology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
van der Togt CJT, Ten Cate DF, van den Bemt BJF, Rahamat-Langendoen J, den Broeder N, den Broeder AA. Seroconversion after a third COVID-19 vaccine is affected by rituximab dose but persistence is not in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2022; 62:1627-1630. [PMID: 36000861 PMCID: PMC9452149 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2022] [Revised: 08/05/2022] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives In patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with (ultra-)low dose rituximab (RTX), we investigated (1) the association of dosing and timing of rituximab (RTX) on seroconversion after third COVID-19 vaccination, and (2) persistence of humoral response after two-dose vaccination. Methods In this monocentre observational study, patients from the COVAC-cohort were included in the third vaccine analysis if humoral response was obtained 2-6 weeks after third vaccination in previous non-responders, and in the persistence analysis if a follow-up humoral response was obtained before third vaccination in previous responders. Dichotomization between ‘positive’ and ‘negative’ response was based on the assay cut-off. The association between latest RTX dose before first vaccination, timing between latest rituximab and vaccination, and response was analysed with univariable logistic regression. Results Of the 196 patients in the cohort, 98 were included in the third vaccine analysis and 23 in the persistence analysis. Third vaccination response was 19/98 (19%) and higher for 200 mg RTX users (5/13, 38%) than 500 and 1000 mg (7/37, 19% and 7/48, 15%). Non-significant trends were seen for higher response with lower dosing (200 versus 1000 mg: OR 3.66, 95% CI 0.93-14.0) and later timing (per month since infusion: OR 1.16, 0.97-1.35). Humoral response persisted in 96% (22/23) and in 89% (8/9) of patients who received RTX between the two measurements. Conclusion Repeated vaccination as late as possible after the lowest RTX dose possible seems the best vaccination strategy. A once positive humoral response after COVID-19 vaccination persists irrespective of intercurrent rituximab infusion. Trial registration Netherlands Trial Register, https://www.trialregister.nl/, NL9342
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Céleste J T van der Togt
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Rheumatology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, The Netherlands
| | - David F Ten Cate
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, The Netherlands
| | - Bart J F van den Bemt
- Department of Pharmacy, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, The Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Nathan den Broeder
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Rheumatology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, The Netherlands
| | - Alfons A den Broeder
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatic Diseases, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Bolhuis TE, Marsman D, van den Hoogen FHJ, Broeder AAD, Broeder ND, van der Maas A. (Dis)agreement of polymyalgia rheumatica relapse criteria, and prediction of relapse in a retrospective cohort. BMC Rheumatol 2022; 6:45. [PMID: 35915465 PMCID: PMC9344672 DOI: 10.1186/s41927-022-00274-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2021] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To develop and assess a prediction model for polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) relapse within the first year of glucocorticoid (GC) treatment. Methods A retrospective PMR cohort (clinical diagnosis) from a rheumatology department was used. All visits > 30 days after starting GC treatment and with > 2.5 mg/day oral prednisolone were used as potential relapse visits. Often used relapse criteria (1) rheumatologist judgement, (2) treatment intensification-based relapse) were assessed for agreement in this cohort. The proportion of patients with treatment-based relapse within 1 and 2 years of treatment and the relapse incidence rate were used to assess unadjusted associations with candidate predictors using logistic and Poisson regression respectively. After using a multiple imputation method, a multivariable model was developed and assessed to predict the occurrence (yes/no) of relapse within the first year of treatment. Results Data from 417 patients was used. Relapse occurred at 399 and 321 (of 2422) visits based on the rheumatologist judgement- and treatment-based criteria respectively, with low to moderate agreement between the two (87% (95% CI 0.86–0.88), with κ = 0.49 (95% CI 0.44–0.54)). Treatment-based relapse within the first two years was significantly associated with CRP, ESR, and pre-treatment symptom duration, and incidence rate with only CRP and ESR. A model to predict treatment intensification within the first year of treatment was developed using sex, medical history of cardiovascular disease and malignancies, pre-treatment symptom duration, ESR, and Hb, with an AUC of 0.60–0.65. Conclusion PMR relapse occurs frequently, although commonly used criteria only show moderate agreement, underlining the importance of a uniform definition and criteria of a PMR specific relapse. A model to predict treatment intensification was developed using practical predictors, although its performance was modest. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41927-022-00274-y.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas E Bolhuis
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, The Netherlands. .,Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Diane Marsman
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, The Netherlands.,Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Frank H J van den Hoogen
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Alfons A den Broeder
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Nathan den Broeder
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, The Netherlands.,Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Aatke van der Maas
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Messelink MA, van der Leeuw MS, den Broeder AA, Tekstra J, van der Goes MC, Heijstek MW, Lafeber F, Welsing PMJ. Prediction Aided Tapering In rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with biOlogicals (PATIO): protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2022; 23:494. [PMID: 35710576 PMCID: PMC9202120 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06471-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2021] [Accepted: 06/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) are effective in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) but are expensive and increase the risk of infection. Therefore, in patients with a stable low level of disease activity or remission, tapering bDMARDs should be considered. Although tapering does not seem to affect long-term disease control, (short-lived) flares are frequent during the tapering process. We have previously developed and externally validated a dynamic flare prediction model for use as a decision aid during stepwise tapering of bDMARDs to reduce the risk of a flare during this process. METHODS In this investigator-initiated, multicenter, open-label, randomized (1:1) controlled trial, we will assess the effect of incorporating flare risk predictions into a bDMARD tapering strategy. One hundred sixty RA patients treated with a bDMARD with stable low disease activity will be recruited. In the control group, the bDMARD will be tapered according to "disease activity guided dose optimization" (DGDO). In the intervention group, the bDMARD will be tapered according to a strategy that combines DGDO with the dynamic flare prediction model, where the next bDMARD tapering step is not taken in case of a high risk of flare. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to the control or intervention group. The primary outcome is the number of flares per patient (DAS28-CRP increase > 1.2, or DAS28-CRP increase > 0.6 with a current DAS28-CRP ≥ 2.9) during the 18-month follow-up period. Secondary outcomes include the number of patients with a major flare (flare duration ≥ 12 weeks), bDMARD dose reduction, adverse events, disease activity (DAS28-CRP) and patient-reported outcomes such as quality of life and functional disability. Health Care Utilization and Work Productivity will also be assessed. DISCUSSION This will be the first clinical trial to evaluate the benefit of applying a dynamic flare prediction model as a decision aid during bDMARD tapering. Reducing the risk of flaring during tapering may enhance the safety and (cost)effectiveness of bDMARD treatment. Furthermore, this study pioneers the field of implementing predictive algorithms in clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION Dutch Trial Register number NL9798, registered 18 October 2021, https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/9798 . The study has received ethical review board approval (number NL74537.041.20).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianne A Messelink
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3508, GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Matthijs S van der Leeuw
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3508, GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Alfons A den Broeder
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Hengstdal 3, 6574, NA, Ubbergen, The Netherlands
| | - Janneke Tekstra
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3508, GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marlies C van der Goes
- Department of Rheumatology, Meander Medical Center, Maatweg 3, 3813, TZ, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Marloes W Heijstek
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3508, GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Floris Lafeber
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3508, GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Paco M J Welsing
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3508, GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Michielsens CA, den Broeder N, van den Hoogen FH, Mahler EA, Teerenstra S, van der Heijde D, Verhoef LM, den Broeder AA. Treat-to-target dose reduction and withdrawal strategy of TNF inhibitors in psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis: a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. Ann Rheum Dis 2022; 81:1392-1399. [PMID: 35701155 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-222260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) are effective in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), but are associated with a small (0.6%) increase in serious infection risk, patient burden due to need for self-injection and high costs. Treat-to-target (T2T) tapering might ameliorate these drawbacks, but high-quality evidence on T2T tapering strategies is lacking in PsA and axSpA. METHODS We performed a pragmatic open-label, monocentre, randomised controlled non-inferiority (NI) trial on T2T tapering of TNFi. Patients with PsA and axSpA using a TNFi with ≥6 months stable low disease activity (LDA) were included. Patients were randomised 2:1 to disease activity-guided T2T with or without tapering until withdrawal and followed-up to 12 months. Primary endpoint was the difference in proportion of patients having LDA at 12 months between groups, compared with a prespecified NI margin of 20%, estimated using a Bayesian prior. RESULTS 122 patients (64 PsA and 58 axSpA) were randomised to a T2T strategy with (N=81) or without tapering (N=41). The proportion of patients in LDA at 12 months was 69% for the tapering and 73% for the no-tapering group: adjusted difference 5% (Bayesian 95% credible interval: -10% to 19%) which confirms NI considering the NI margin of 20%. The mean percentage of daily defined dose was 53% for the tapering and 91% for the no-tapering group at month 12. CONCLUSIONS A T2T TNFi strategy with tapering attempt is non-inferior to a T2T strategy without tapering with regard to the proportion of patients still in LDA at 12 months, and results in a substantial reduction of TNFi use. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NL 6771.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celia Aj Michielsens
- Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, Gelderland, The Netherlands .,Department of Rheumatic Diseases, Radboudumc Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, Gelderland, The Netherlands
| | - Nathan den Broeder
- Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, Gelderland, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatic Diseases, Radboudumc Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, Gelderland, The Netherlands
| | | | - Elien Am Mahler
- Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, Gelderland, The Netherlands
| | - Steven Teerenstra
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department for Health Evidence, group Biostatistics, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Gelderland, The Netherlands
| | | | - Lise M Verhoef
- Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, Gelderland, The Netherlands
| | - Alfons A den Broeder
- Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, Gelderland, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatic Diseases, Radboudumc Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, Gelderland, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Marsman DE, Bolhuis TE, den Broeder N, den Broeder AA, van der Maas A. PolyMyalgia Rheumatica treatment with Methotrexate in Optimal Dose in an Early disease phase (PMR MODE): study protocol for a multicenter double-blind placebo controlled trial. Trials 2022; 23:318. [PMID: 35428320 PMCID: PMC9012047 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06263-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2021] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) is an inflammatory rheumatic disease affecting people older than 50, resulting in pain and stiffness of the neck, shoulder, and pelvic girdle. To date, glucocorticoids (GC) remain the cornerstone of treatment, but these have several drawbacks. Firstly, a large proportion of patients do not achieve GC-free remission within either the first (over 70%) or second year of treatment (over 50%). Secondly, GC-related adverse events (AE) occur in up to 65% of patients and can be severe. The current EULAR/ACR guidelines for PMR recommend early introduction of methotrexate (MTX) as a GC sparing agent in patients at risk for worse prognosis. However, earlier trials of low to medium quality only studied MTX dosages of 7.5–10 mg/week with no to modest effect. These doses may be suboptimal as MTX is recommended in higher doses (25 mg/week) for other inflammatory rheumatic diseases. The exact role, timing, and dose of MTX in PMR remain unclear, and therefore, our objective is to study the efficacy of MTX 25 mg/week in recently diagnosed PMR patients. Methods We set up a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled superiority trial (PMR MODE) to assess the efficacy of MTX 25 mg/week versus placebo in a 1:1 ratio in 100 recently diagnosed PMR patients according to the 2012 EULAR/ACR criteria. All patients will receive prednisolone 15 mg/day, tapered to 0 mg over the course of 24 weeks. In case of primary non-response or disease relapse, prednisolone dose will be temporarily increased. Assessments will take place at baseline, 4, 12, 24, 32, and 52 weeks. The primary outcome is the difference in proportion of patients in GC-free remission at week 52. Discussion No relapsing PMR patients were chosen, since the possible benefits of MTX may not outweigh the risks at low doses and effect modification may occur. Accelerated tapering was chosen in order to more easily identify a GC-sparing effect if one exists. A composite endpoint of GC-free remission was chosen as a clinically relevant endpoint for both patients and rheumatologist and may reduce second order (treatment) effects. Trial registration Dutch Trial Registration, NL8366. Registered on 10 February 2020
Collapse
|
27
|
van der Togt CJT, Ten Cate DF, den Broeder N, Rahamat-Langendoen J, van den Bemt BJF, den Broeder AA. Humoral response to Coronavirus Disease-19 vaccines is dependent on dosage and timing of rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2022; 61:SI175-SI179. [PMID: 35377422 PMCID: PMC8992349 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2021] [Revised: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Humoral response to vaccines in RA patients treated with rituximab (RTX) in standard dosages (≥1000 mg) is decreased. Ultra-low dosages (500 or 200 mg) may have better response. Also, timing after latest RTX infusion may be an important variable. We aimed to investigate the influence of RTX dosage and timing on response to COVID-19 vaccination in RA patients. Methods A single-centre observational study (n = 196) investigated the humoral response, measured by total Ig anti-COVID-19 assay (positive response ≥1.1), 2–6 weeks after complete COVID-19 vaccination. A multivariable logistic regression model was built to study the effect of RTX dosage and time between latest rituximab and vaccination on response, adjusting for age and methotrexate use. Results After two-dose vaccination, the response rate was significantly better for patients receiving 200 mg (n = 31, 45%) rituximab compared with 1000 mg (n = 98, 26%; odds ratio 3.07, 95% CI 1.14–8.27) and for each additional month between latest rituximab and vaccination (OR 1.67, 1.39–2.01). Conclusion Both increased time between latest rituximab infusion and complete vaccination, and 200 mg as latest dose were associated with a better response to COVID-19 vaccination and should be considered when trying to increase vaccine response after rituximab in RA patients. Trial registration Netherlands Trial Register, https://www.trialregister.nl/, NL9342.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Céleste J T van der Togt
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Rheumatology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, The Netherlands
| | - David F Ten Cate
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, The Netherlands
| | - Nathan den Broeder
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Rheumatology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Bart J F van den Bemt
- Department of Pharmacy, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, The Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Alfons A den Broeder
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatic Diseases, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
van der Leeuw MS, Messelink MA, Tekstra J, Medina O, van Laar JM, Haitjema S, Lafeber F, Veris-van Dieren JJ, van der Goes MC, den Broeder AA, Welsing PMJ. Using real-world data to dynamically predict flares during tapering of biological DMARDs in rheumatoid arthritis: development, validation, and potential impact of prediction-aided decisions. Arthritis Res Ther 2022; 24:74. [PMID: 35321739 PMCID: PMC8941811 DOI: 10.1186/s13075-022-02751-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 02/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) are effective in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. However, as bDMARDs may also lead to adverse events and are expensive, tapering them is of great clinical interest. Tapering according to disease activity-guided dose optimization (DGDO) does not seem to affect long term remission rates, but flares are frequent during this process. Our objective was to develop a model for the prediction of flares during bDMARD tapering using data from routine care and to evaluate its potential clinical impact. Methods We used a joint latent class model to repeatedly predict the probability of a flare occurring within the next 3 months. The model was developed using longitudinal data on disease activity (DAS28) and other routine care data from two clinics. Predictive accuracy was assessed in cross-validation and external validation was performed with data from the DRESS (Dose REduction Strategy of Subcutaneous tumor necrosis factor inhibitors) trial. Additionally, we simulated the reduction in number of flares and bDMARD dose when implementing the model as a decision aid during bDMARD tapering in the DRESS trial. Results Data from 279 bDMARD courses were used for model development. The final model included two latent DAS28-trajectories, bDMARD type and dose, disease duration, and seropositivity. The area under the curve of the final model was 0.76 (0.69–0.83) in cross-validation and 0.68 (0.62–0.73) in external validation. In simulation of prediction-aided decisions, the mean number of flares over 18 months decreased from 1.21 (0.99–1.43) to 0.75 (0.54–0.96). The reduction in he bDMARD dose was mostly maintained, increasing from 54 to 64% of full dose. Conclusions We developed a dynamic flare prediction model, exclusively based on data typically available in routine care. Our results show that using this model to aid decisions during bDMARD tapering may significantly reduce the number of flares while maintaining most of the bDMARD dose reduction. Trial registration The clinical impact of the prediction model is currently under investigation in the PATIO randomized controlled trial (Dutch Trial Register number NL9798). Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13075-022-02751-8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthijs S van der Leeuw
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marianne A Messelink
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Janneke Tekstra
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ojay Medina
- Department of Digital Health, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jaap M van Laar
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Saskia Haitjema
- Central Diagnostic Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Floris Lafeber
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marlies C van der Goes
- Department of Rheumatology, Meander Medical Center, Maatweg 3, 3813 TZ, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Alfons A den Broeder
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Hengstdal 3, 6574 NA , Ubbergen, The Netherlands
| | - Paco M J Welsing
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Bolhuis TE, Nizet LE, Owen C, den Broeder AA, van den Ende CH, van der Maas A. Measurement properties of the PolyMyalgia Rheumatica Activity Score (PMR-AS): a systematic literature review. J Rheumatol 2022; 49:627-634. [DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.211292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Objective To perform a COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) based Systematic Literature Review of measurement properties of the Polymyalgia Rheumatica Activity Score (PMR-AS). Methods Pubmed, EMBASE, and CINAHL were broadly searched. English full text articles, with (quantitative) data on at least 5 PMR patients using the PMR-AS were selected. Seven hypotheses for construct validity and three for responsiveness, concerning associations with erythrocyte sedimentation rate, physical function, quality of life, clinical disease states, ultrasound, and treatment response, were formulated. Articles usable to assess - COSMIN based - structural validity, internal consistency, reliability, measurement error, or hypotheses on construct validity or responsiveness were selected and assessed based on COSMIN criteria. Results From the 26 articles using the PMR-AS we were able to use 12 articles. Structural validity, internal consistency, construct validity, and responsiveness were assessed in one, two, eight, and three articles respectively. Insufficient evidence was found to confirm structural validity and internal consistency. No data was found on reliability or measurement error. Although 60% and 67% of hypotheses tested for construct validity and responsiveness were confirmed respectively, there was insufficient evidence to meet criteria for good measurement properties. Conclusion Whilst there is some promising evidence for construct validity and responsiveness of the PMR-AS, it is lacking for other properties and overall falls short of criteria for good measurement properties. Therefore, further research is needed to assess its role in clinical research and care.
Collapse
|
30
|
Atalay S, Berends SE, Groenewoud HMM, Mathot RAA, Njoo DM, Mommers JM, Ossenkoppele PM, Koetsier MIA, Berends MA, de Vries A, van de Kerkhof PCM, den Broeder AA, de Jong EMGJ, van den Reek JMPA. Serum drug levels and anti-drug antibodies in the context of dose tapering by interval prolongation of adalimumab, etanercept and ustekinumab in psoriasis patients: results of the CONDOR trial. J DERMATOL TREAT 2022; 33:2680-2684. [PMID: 35193441 DOI: 10.1080/09546634.2022.2043546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Biologics for psoriasis are registered in standard dosages. In patients with low disease activity, reduction of the dose by interval prolongation can prevent overtreatment, and lower risks and costs. However, fear for increased anti-drug antibody (ADA) formation due to interval prolongation of biologics is an important barrier. OBJECTIVE To investigate the course of serum drug concentrations, ADA levels, and predictors for successful dose reduction of adalimumab, ustekinumab, and etanercept for psoriasis. METHODS Patients were randomized to dose reduction (DR) or usual care (UC) and followed for one year. The course and extent of detectable ADA levels were expressed as proportions/relative risks for DR vs. UC. Association of baseline characteristics with successful tapering was investigated with log-binomial regression analysis. RESULTS In total, 118 patients were included. In adalimumab-treated patients, no significant difference in the proportion of patients with relevant ADA levels in DR vs. UC was seen. For ustekinumab, relevant ADA development was absent in both groups. Baseline trough levels were not predictive for successful DR. CONCLUSIONS Immunogenicity may not increase by interval prolongation in psoriasis patients with low disease activity. This pilot provides important and reassuring insight into the pharmacological changes after dose tapering of adalimumab, etanercept, and ustekinumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Selma Atalay
- Department of Dermatology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen René Descartesdreef 1, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Sophie E Berends
- Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Hans M M Groenewoud
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Ron A A Mathot
- Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - David M Njoo
- Department of Dermatology, Ziekenhuis Groep Twente, Hengelo, Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Maartje A Berends
- Department of Dermatology, Slingelandziekenhuis, Doetinchem, Netherlands
| | - Annick de Vries
- Biologics Lab, Bioanalysis, Sanquin Diagnostic Services, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Elke M G J de Jong
- Department of Dermatology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen René Descartesdreef 1, Nijmegen, Netherlands.,Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Juul M P A van den Reek
- Department of Dermatology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen René Descartesdreef 1, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Ulijn E, den Broeder AA, Boers N, Gotthardt M, Bouman CAM, Landewé R, den Broeder N, van Herwaarden N. Extra-articular findings with FDG-PET/CT in rheumatoid arthritis patients: more harm than benefit. Rheumatol Adv Pract 2022; 6:rkac014. [PMID: 35311064 PMCID: PMC8924972 DOI: 10.1093/rap/rkac014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 02/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Objective
Whole-body Positron Emission Tomography with CT-scanning using fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) is occasionally used in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients to detect arthritis. FDG-PET/CT might also detect malignancies, but the amount of incidental findings and the number of relevant malignant disease that could be missed are currently unknown. We aimed to study the malignancy screening performance of whole-body FDG-PET/CT in longstanding RA patients with low disease activity.
Methods
FDG-PET/CT-scanning was done in the intervention arm of the Dose REduction Strategy of Subcutaneous TNF-inhibitors (DRESS) study, a randomized controlled trial on dose-tapering of biological Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (bDMARDs). The reference standard was clinical diagnosis of malignancy during the 3 year follow-up of the study. Prevalence of extra-articular abnormalities, follow-up, and treatments were summarized post-hoc.
Results
121 scans were made in 79 patients. Extra-articular abnormalities were found in 59/121 (49%) scans, resulting in additional diagnostic procedures in 21/79 (26.6%) patients. Nine patients (7.4%) were suspected of malignancy, none turned out to be malignant. Six clinical malignancies that developed during follow-up were all negative on baseline FDG-PET/CT.
Conclusion
Whole-body FDG-PET/CT-scanning used in RA patients for imaging of arthritis results in frequent incidental extra-articular findings, while some who apparently had normal scans also developed malignancies.
Trial registration
Netherlands Trial Register, www.trialregister.nl, NL6771
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evy Ulijn
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Alfons A den Broeder
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Department of Rheumatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Nadine Boers
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Martin Gotthardt
- Radiology Nuclear Medicine, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Chantal A M Bouman
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Department of Rheumatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Robert Landewé
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical immunology, Amsterdam Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nathan den Broeder
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Noortje van Herwaarden
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Department of Pharmacology-Toxicology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Opdam MAA, Benoy S, Verhoef LM, Van Bijnen S, Lamers-Karnebeek F, Traksel RAM, Vos P, den Broeder AA, Broen J. Identification of risk factors for COVID-19 hospitalisation in patients with anti-rheumatic drugs: results from a multicentre nested case control study'. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2022; 111:1061-1065. [PMID: 35143039 PMCID: PMC9087006 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.2551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2021] [Accepted: 01/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRDs) do not have an increased risk for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) compared with the general population. However, it remains uncertain whether subgroups of patients with IRD using different immunosuppressive antirheumatic drugs carry a higher risk for severe COVID‐19 compared with other patients with IRD. The aim of this study is to identify risk factors for severe COVID‐19, requiring hospitalization in patients with IRD. This is a multicenter nested case control study conducted in the Netherlands. Cases are hospital known patients with IRD requiring hospitalization for COVID‐19 between March 1, 2020, and May 31, 2020. Controls are hospital known patients with IRD not requiring hospitalization for COVID‐19 in this period, included at a 4:1 ratio. Patient, disease, and treatment characteristics were extracted from electronic medical records and a questionnaire. Potential risk factors were analyzed using unconditional logistic regression, corrected for confounders and multiple testing. Eighty‐one cases and 396 controls were included. General risk factors of older age and obesity apply to patients with IRD as well (odds ratio (OR) for age ≥ 75 3.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.9–6.3, OR for body mass index ≥ 40 4.5, 95% CI 1.5–14). No significantly increased ORs for COVID‐19 hospitalization were found for any antirheumatic agent or IRD. A protective effect was found for use of methotrexate (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.31–0.92). In conclusion, similar to the general population, elderly and obese patients with IRD have a higher risk for hospitalization for COVID‐19. We did not identify a specific antirheumatic agent or IRD to increase the risk of COVID‐19 hospitalization in patients with IRD, except for a possible protective effect of methotrexate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Merel A A Opdam
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Sophie Benoy
- Regional Rheumatology Centre, Máxima Medical Centre, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Lise M Verhoef
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Sandra Van Bijnen
- Department of Rheumatology, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, Netherlands
| | | | - R A M Traksel
- Regional Rheumatology Centre, Máxima Medical Centre, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Petra Vos
- Department of Rheumatology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, Netherlands
| | | | - Jasper Broen
- Regional Rheumatology Centre, Máxima Medical Centre, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Wientjes MHM, Gijzen TMG, den Broeder N, Bloem K, de Vries A, van den Bemt BJF, den Broeder AA, Verhoef LM. Drug levels, anti-drug antibodies and B-cell counts were not predictive of response in rheumatoid arthritis patients on low dose rituximab. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2022; 61:3974-3980. [PMID: 35022672 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2021] [Revised: 01/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The REDO trial showed that ultra-low dose rituximab (500 mg or 200 mg) was similarly effective in the majority of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. This pre-planned secondary analysis investigates 1) associations between rituximab dosage, drug levels, anti-drug antibodies (ADA) and B cell counts and 2) the predictive value of pharmacokinetic and -dynamic parameters, patient, disease and treatment characteristics in relation to response to ultra-low dose rituximab. METHODS For 140 RA patients from the REDO trial, differences in drug levels, ADA and B cell counts were examined at baseline, three and six months after dosing. Treatment response was defined as absence of flare and no extra rituximab or > 1 glucocorticoid injection received during follow-up. The association between potential predictors and response was investigated using logistic regression analyses. RESULTS Lower doses of rituximab resulted in lower drug levels but did not significantly affect ADA levels and B cell counts. 3 (10.7%), 12 (20.7%) and 7 (13.0%) patients failed to meet response-criteria in respectively the 1000 mg, 500 mg and 200 mg group. Drug levels, ADA and B cell counts as well as patient, disease and treatment characteristics were not predictive for response to ultra-low dose rituximab. CONCLUSION Results of this study further support that continued treatment with 500 or 200 mg rituximab is similarly effective as 1000 mg in RA patients doing well on rituximab. These results, combined with absence of clinical dose response relation in the original REDO study, suggest that 200 mg rituximab is not yet the lowest effective rituximab retreatment dose in RA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maike H M Wientjes
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.,Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Titia M G Gijzen
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Nathan den Broeder
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Karien Bloem
- Biologics Lab, Sanquin Diagnostic Services, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Annick de Vries
- Biologics Lab, Sanquin Diagnostic Services, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart J F van den Bemt
- Department of Pharmacy, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.,Department of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Alfons A den Broeder
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Lise M Verhoef
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Sánchez-Maldonado JM, Cáliz R, López-Nevot MÁ, Cabrera-Serrano AJ, Moñiz-Díez A, Canhão H, Ter Horst R, Quartuccio L, Sorensen SB, Glintborg B, Hetland ML, Filipescu I, Pérez-Pampin E, Conesa-Zamora P, Swierkot J, den Broeder AA, De Vita S, Petersen ERB, Li Y, Ferrer MA, Escudero A, Netea MG, Coenen MJH, Andersen V, Fonseca JE, Jurado M, Bogunia-Kubik K, Collantes E, Sainz J. Validation of GWAS-Identified Variants for Anti-TNF Drug Response in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Meta-Analysis of Two Large Cohorts. Front Immunol 2021; 12:672255. [PMID: 34777329 PMCID: PMC8579100 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.672255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
We aimed to validate the association of 28 GWAS-identified genetic variants for response to TNF inhibitors (TNFi) in a discovery cohort of 1361 rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients monitored in routine care and ascertained through the REPAIR consortium and DANBIO registry. We genotyped selected markers and evaluated their association with response to TNFi after 6 months of treatment according to the change in disease activity score 28 (ΔDAS28). Next, we confirmed the most interesting results through meta-analysis of our data with those from the DREAM cohort that included 706 RA patients treated with TNFi. The meta-analysis of the discovery cohort and DREAM registry including 2067 RA patients revealed an overall association of the LINC02549rs7767069 SNP with a lower improvement in DAS28 that remained significant after correction for multiple testing (per-allele ORMeta=0.83, PMeta=0.000077; PHet=0.61). In addition, we found that each copy of the LRRC55rs717117G allele was significantly associated with lower improvement in DAS28 in rheumatoid factor (RF)-positive patients (per-allele ORMeta=0.67, P=0.00058; PHet=0.06) whereas an opposite but not significant effect was detected in RF-negative subjects (per-allele ORMeta=1.38, P=0.10; PHet=0.45; PInteraction=0.00028). Interestingly, although the identified associations did not survive multiple testing correction, the meta-analysis also showed overall and RF-specific associations for the MAFBrs6071980 and CNTN5rs1813443 SNPs with decreased changes in DAS28 (per-allele ORMeta_rs6071980 = 0.85, P=0.0059; PHet=0.63 and ORMeta_rs1813443_RF+=0.81, P=0.0059; PHet=0.69 and ORMeta_rs1813443_RF-=1.00, P=0.99; PHet=0.12; PInteraction=0.032). Mechanistically, we found that subjects carrying the LINC02549rs7767069T allele had significantly increased numbers of CD45RO+CD45RA+ T cells (P=0.000025) whereas carriers of the LINC02549rs7767069T/T genotype showed significantly increased levels of soluble scavengers CD5 and CD6 in serum (P=0.00037 and P=0.00041). In addition, carriers of the LRRC55rs717117G allele showed decreased production of IL6 after stimulation of PBMCs with B burgdorferi and E coli bacteria (P=0.00046 and P=0.00044), which suggested a reduced IL6-mediated anti-inflammatory effect of this marker to worsen the response to TNFi. In conclusion, this study confirmed the influence of the LINC02549 and LRRC55 loci to determine the response to TNFi in RA patients and suggested a weak effect of the MAFB and CNTN5 loci that need to be further investigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose Manuel Sánchez-Maldonado
- Genomic Oncology Area, Centre for Genomics and Oncological Research (GENYO), Parque tecnológico de la Salud (PTS) Granada, Granada, Spain.,Hematology Department, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Granada, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria (IBs) Granada, Granada, Spain
| | - Rafael Cáliz
- Genomic Oncology Area, Centre for Genomics and Oncological Research (GENYO), Parque tecnológico de la Salud (PTS) Granada, Granada, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria (IBs) Granada, Granada, Spain.,Department of Rheumatology, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Granada, Spain
| | - Miguel Ángel López-Nevot
- Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria (IBs) Granada, Granada, Spain.,Immunology Department, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Granada, Spain
| | - Antonio José Cabrera-Serrano
- Genomic Oncology Area, Centre for Genomics and Oncological Research (GENYO), Parque tecnológico de la Salud (PTS) Granada, Granada, Spain.,Hematology Department, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Granada, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria (IBs) Granada, Granada, Spain
| | - Ana Moñiz-Díez
- Genomic Oncology Area, Centre for Genomics and Oncological Research (GENYO), Parque tecnológico de la Salud (PTS) Granada, Granada, Spain.,Hematology Department, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Granada, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria (IBs) Granada, Granada, Spain
| | - Helena Canhão
- EpiDoC Unit, CEDOC, NOVA Medical School and National School of Public Health, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.,Comprehensive Health Research Center (CHRC), NOVA Medical School, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Rob Ter Horst
- Department of Internal Medicine and Radboud Center for Infectious Diseases, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Luca Quartuccio
- Department of Medical Area, Clinic of Rheumatology, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Signe B Sorensen
- Molecular Diagnostic and Clinical Research Unit, IRS-Center Sonderjylland, University Hospital of Southern Jutland, Aabenraa, Denmark.,Institute of Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Bente Glintborg
- The Danish Rheumatologic Biobank and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (DANBIO) Registry, The Danish Rheumatologic Biobank and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Merete L Hetland
- The Danish Rheumatologic Biobank and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (DANBIO) Registry, The Danish Rheumatologic Biobank and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ileana Filipescu
- Rheumatology Department, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Iuliu Hatieganu", Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Eva Pérez-Pampin
- Rheumatology Unit, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Pablo Conesa-Zamora
- Clinical Analysis Department, Santa Lucía University Hospital, Cartagena, Spain
| | - Jerzy Swierkot
- Department of Rheumatology and Internal Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Alfons A den Broeder
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Rheumatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Salvatore De Vita
- Department of Medical Area, Clinic of Rheumatology, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Eva Rabing Brix Petersen
- Department of Biochemistry and Immunology, University Hospital of Southern Jutland, Aabenraa, Denmark
| | - Yang Li
- Department of Internal Medicine and Radboud Center for Infectious Diseases, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.,Centre for Individualised Infection Medicine (CiiM) & Centre for Experimental and Clinical Infection Research (TWINCORE), Helmholtz-Centre for Infection Research (HZI) and The Hannover Medical School (MHH), Hannover, Germany
| | - Miguel A Ferrer
- Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria (IBs) Granada, Granada, Spain
| | - Alejandro Escudero
- Rheumatology Department, Reina Sofía Hospital/Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba (IMIBIC)/University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain
| | - Mihai G Netea
- Department of Internal Medicine and Radboud Center for Infectious Diseases, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.,Department for Immunology & Metabolism, Life and Medical Sciences Institute (LIMES), University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Marieke J H Coenen
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Vibeke Andersen
- Department of Medical Area, Clinic of Rheumatology, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.,Molecular Diagnostic and Clinical Research Unit, IRS-Center Sonderjylland, University Hospital of Southern Jutland, Aabenraa, Denmark.,Institute of Regional Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - João E Fonseca
- Rheumatology and Metabolic Bone Diseases Department, Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte (CHLN), Lisbon, Portugal.,Rheumatology Research Unit, Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Lisbon Academic Medical Center, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Manuel Jurado
- Genomic Oncology Area, Centre for Genomics and Oncological Research (GENYO), Parque tecnológico de la Salud (PTS) Granada, Granada, Spain.,Hematology Department, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Granada, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria (IBs) Granada, Granada, Spain
| | - Katarzyna Bogunia-Kubik
- Hirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy, Polish Academy of Sciences, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Eduardo Collantes
- Rheumatology Department, Reina Sofía Hospital/Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba (IMIBIC)/University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain
| | - Juan Sainz
- Genomic Oncology Area, Centre for Genomics and Oncological Research (GENYO), Parque tecnológico de la Salud (PTS) Granada, Granada, Spain.,Hematology Department, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Granada, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria (IBs) Granada, Granada, Spain.,Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology I, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
van Wissen MAT, Teuwen MMH, van den Ende CHM, Vliet Vlieland TPM, den Broeder AA, van den Hout WB, Peter WF, van Schaardenburg D, van Tubergen AM, Gademan MGJ, van Weely SFE. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of longstanding exercise therapy versus usual care in patients with axial spondyloarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis and severe limitations: The protocols of two parallel randomized controlled trials. Physiother Res Int 2021; 27:e1933. [PMID: 34780107 PMCID: PMC9285698 DOI: 10.1002/pri.1933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Accepted: 10/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
Objectives Research on effectiveness and cost‐effectiveness of longstanding exercise therapy in patients with axial SpondyloArthritis (axSpA) or Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) is scarce, and mainly concerned patients with a relatively favorable health status. We aim to evaluate the effectiveness and cost‐effectiveness of longstanding exercise therapy compared to usual care in the subgroup of patients with axSpA or RA and severe limitations in functioning. Methods In two separate, parallel randomized controlled trials the effectiveness and cost‐effectiveness of longstanding, active exercise therapy (52 weeks) compared with usual care (1:1) will be evaluated. The longstanding, active exercise therapy will focus on improving individual limitations in daily activities and participation and will be given by a trained physical therapist in the vicinity of the participant. For each diagnosis, 215 patients with severe limitations in activities and participation will be included. Assessments are performed at baseline, 12, 26, and 52 weeks. The primary outcome measure of effectiveness is the individual level of functioning (activities and participation), as measured with the Patient‐Specific Complaints instrument at 52 weeks. For cost‐effectiveness analyses, the EuroQol (EQ‐5D‐5L) and questionnaires on healthcare use and productivity will be administered. The economic evaluation will be a cost‐utility analysis from a societal perspective. After 52 weeks, the patients in the usual care group are offered longstanding, active exercise therapy as well. Follow‐up assessments are done at 104, 156, and 208 weeks. Conclusion The results of these studies will provide insights in the effectiveness and cost‐effectiveness of longstanding exercise therapy in the subgroup of axSpA and RA patients with severe functional limitations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria A T van Wissen
- Department of Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Max M H Teuwen
- Department of Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelia H M van den Ende
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology, Radboud UMC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Thea P M Vliet Vlieland
- Department of Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Alfons A den Broeder
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology, Radboud UMC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Wilbert B van den Hout
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Wilfred F Peter
- Department of Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Astrid M van Tubergen
- Department of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,The Netherlands and Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Maaike G J Gademan
- Department of Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Clinical epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Salima F E van Weely
- Department of Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Bouman CAM, van Herwaarden N, Blanken AB, Van der Laken CJ, Gotthardt M, Oyen WJG, den Broeder AA, van der Maas A, van den Ende CH. 18F-FDG PET-CT scanning in rheumatoid arthritis patients tapering TNFi: reliability, validity and predictive value. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2021; 61:SI6-SI13. [PMID: 34791068 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the reliability and validity of 18F-FDG PET-CT scanning (FDG-PET) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with low disease activity tapering tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) and its' predictive value for successful tapering or discontinuation. METHODS Patients in the tapering arm of the DRESS study, a randomized controlled trial on TNFi tapering in RA, underwent FDG-PET before tapering (baseline) and after maximal tapering. 48 joints per scan were scored: 1) visually (FDG-avid joint (FAJ) y/n), 2) quantitatively (maximal and mean standardized uptake values (SUVmax and SUVmean)). Interobserver agreement was calculated in 10 patients at baseline. Quantitative and visual FDG-PET scores were investigated for: 1) (multilevel) association with clinical parameters both on joint and patient level and 2) predictive value at baseline and change between baseline and maximal tapering (delta) for successful tapering and discontinuation at 18 months. RESULTS 79 patients underwent FDG-PET. For performance of identification of FAJs on PET, Cohen's kappa was 0.49 (0.35-0.63). For SUVmax and SUVmean, ICCs were 0.80 (0.77-0.83) and 0.96 (0.9-1.0), respectively. On joint level, swelling was significantly associated with SUVmax and SUVmean (B coefficients with 95%CI 1.0 (0.73-1.35) and 0.2 (0.08-0.32) respectively). On patient level only correlation with acute phase reactants was found. FDG-PET scores were not predictive for successful tapering or discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS Quantitative FDG-PET arthritis scoring in RA patients with low disease activity is reliable and has some construct validity. However, no predictive values were found for FDG-PET parameters for successful tapering and/or discontinuation of TNFi.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chantal A M Bouman
- Department of Rheumatology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Noortje van Herwaarden
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Farmacology-Toxicology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Annelies B Blanken
- Department of Rheumatology, AmsterdamUMC-location VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology, Reade, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Conny J Van der Laken
- Department of Rheumatology, AmsterdamUMC-location VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martin Gotthardt
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Wim J G Oyen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Nuclear Medicin, Humanitas University and Clinical and Research Center, Milan, Italy.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Alfons A den Broeder
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Aatke van der Maas
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelia H van den Ende
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Marsman DE, den Broeder N, van den Hoogen FHJ, den Broeder AA, van der Maas A. Efficacy of rituximab in patients with polymyalgia rheumatica: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, proof-of-concept trial. The Lancet Rheumatology 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/s2665-9913(21)00245-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
|
38
|
Michielsens CAJ, den Broeder N, Mulder MLM, van den Hoogen FHJ, Verhoef LM, den Broeder AA. Tumour necrosis factor inhibitor dose adaptation in psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis (TAPAS): a retrospective cohort study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2021; 61:2307-2315. [PMID: 34599803 PMCID: PMC9157113 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2021] [Revised: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives We investigated the effect of disease activity-guided dose optimization (DAGDO) of TNF inhibitor (TNFi) on disease activity and TNFi dose in PsA and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) patients with low disease activity (LDA). Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted in PsA and axSpA patients doing well on TNFi and eligible for TNFi DAGDO. Three different treatment periods were defined: (i) full dose continuation period, (ii) TNFi DAGDO period, and (iii) period with stable TNFi dose after DAGDO. A mixed-model analysis was used to estimate mean Disease Activity Score 28-joint count CRP (DAS28-CRP) and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) during these periods, and a mean percentage of the daily defined dose (%DDD) was calculated as secondary outcome. Results Three hundred and twenty-four patients (153 PsA and 171 axSpA) were included, with a mean of 6.5 DAS28-CRP and 6.4 BASDAI measurements and a median follow-up duration of 46 and 44 months, respectively. A corrected difference of 0.06 (95% CI: −0.09, 0.21) in mean DAS28-CRP was found for the TNFi DAGDO period and 0.03 (95% CI: −0.14, 0.20) for the period with stable TNFi dose, compared with full dose continuation period. Differences for BASDAI were 0.03 (95% CI: −0.21, 0.27) and 0.05 (95% CI: −0.24, 0.34), respectively. The mean %DDD for the three treatment periods was for PsA 108%, 62% and 78%, and for axSpA 108%, 62% and 72%, respectively. Conclusion DAGDO of TNFi reduces drug exposure and has no negative effects on disease activity in PsA and axSpA patients compared with full dose continuation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celia A J Michielsens
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek Nijmegen, the Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatic diseases, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboudumc Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Nathan den Broeder
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Michelle L M Mulder
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek Nijmegen, the Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatic diseases, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboudumc Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Frank H J van den Hoogen
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek Nijmegen, the Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatic diseases, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboudumc Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Lise M Verhoef
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Alfons A den Broeder
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek Nijmegen, the Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatic diseases, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboudumc Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Gasteiger C, den Broeder AA, Stewart S, Gasteiger N, Scholz U, Dalbeth N, Petrie KJ. The mode of delivery and content of communication strategies used in mandatory and non-mandatory biosimilar transitions: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Health Psychol Rev 2021; 17:148-168. [PMID: 34409923 DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2021.1970610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Effective patient-provider communication is crucial to promote shared decision-making. However, it is unclear how to explain treatment changes to ensure patient acceptance, such as when transitioning from a bio-originator to a biosimilar. This review investigates communication strategies used to educate patients on transitioning to biosimilars and explores whether the willingness to transition and treatment persistence differs for the delivery (verbal or written) and the amount of information provided. MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and relevant conference databases were systematically searched. Communication strategies from 33 studies (88% observational cohort studies) published from 2012 to 2020 were synthesized and willingness to transition, persistence, and subjective adverse events explored. Patients only received information verbally in 11 studies. The remaining 22 studies also provided written information. Cost-saving was the main reason provided for the transition. Patients were most willing to transition when receiving written and verbal information (χ2 = 5.83, p = .02) or written information that only addressed a few (3-5) concerns (χ2 = 16.08, p < .001). There was no significant difference for persistence or subjective adverse events (p's > .05). Few randomized controlled trials have been conducted. Available data shows more willingness to transition when patients received written and verbal information. Initial documents should contain basic information and consultations or telephone calls used to address concerns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Gasteiger
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | | - Sarah Stewart
- Bone & Joint Research Group, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Norina Gasteiger
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Urte Scholz
- Department of Psychology- Applied Social and Health Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.,University Research Priority Program 'Dynamics of Healthy Aging', University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Nicola Dalbeth
- Department of Rheumatology, Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand.,Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Keith J Petrie
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Heuvelmans J, den Broeder N, van den Elsen GAH, den Broeder AA, van den Bemt BJF. Effectiveness and tolerability of oral versus subcutaneous methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2021; 61:331-336. [PMID: 33788911 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and tolerability between oral methotrexate (MTX) and subcutaneous MTX in a large group of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in a real-life setting. METHODS In this retrospective cohort study, adult patients with clinical diagnosis of RA who started MTX treatment (monotherapy or combined with hydroxychloroquine), either started with oral or subcutaneous MTX. The primary outcome was superiority testing of between group difference in change in DAS28CRP between baseline and 3-6 months, and subsequent non inferiority testing (NI margin 0.6) analyses in case of non-superiority. Secondary outcomes included MTX dose, side effects, laboratory abnormalities, and use of comedication. RESULTS 640 RA patients were included: 259 started with oral MTX and 381 with subcutaneous. There was no significant difference in ΔDAS28CRP, after adjusting for confounding, 0.13 (95%-CI: -0.14, 0.40), and oral MTX strategy was non inferior to subcutaneous. The mean MTX dose was slightly lower for the oral strategy (18.0 SD6.9 vs 19.9 SD8.2, p= 0.002), which was accompanied by a lower cumulative incidence of adverse events (41% vs 52%, p= 0.005). No differences were seen in use of other comedication. CONCLUSIONS Starting with oral MTX in RA in a real-life setting is non inferior to a subcutaneous MTX treatment with regard to disease activity control, at least when used in dosages up to 25 mg and on a background of HCQ cotreatment and a treat-to-target approach. In addition, tolerability was better. This supports the strategy of starting with oral MTX.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janne Heuvelmans
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | | | - Geke A H van den Elsen
- Department of pharmacology and toxicology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Alfons A den Broeder
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Bart J F van den Bemt
- Department of Pharmacy, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, Netherlands.,Department of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
den Broeder AA, den Broeder N, Verhoef LM. (Ultra-)low dosing of rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis: chances and challenges. Rheumatol Adv Pract 2021; 5:rkab007. [PMID: 33693305 PMCID: PMC7931796 DOI: 10.1093/rap/rkab007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2021] [Accepted: 01/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nathan den Broeder
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, The Netherlands
| | - Lise M Verhoef
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Ubbergen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Kievit W, den Broeder AA. If You Want to Perform a Cost-effectiveness Trial, First Do a Modeling Study. J Rheumatol 2021; 48:473-475. [PMID: 33649068 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.201430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Wietske Kievit
- W. Kievit, PhD, Assistant Professor in Health Technology Assessment, Radboud University Medical Centre, Radboud Institute for Health Science, Department for Health Evidence, Nijmegen;
| | - Alfons A den Broeder
- A.A. den Broeder, MD, PhD, Rheumatologist and Epidemiologist, Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Marsman DE, den Broeder N, Boers N, van den Hoogen FH, den Broeder AA, van der Maas A. Polymyalgia rheumatica patients with and without elevated baseline acute phase reactants: distinct subgroups of polymyalgia rheumatica? Clin Exp Rheumatol 2021; 39:32-37. [DOI: 10.55563/clinexprheumatol/gdps1r] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2019] [Accepted: 02/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Diane E. Marsman
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Nathan den Broeder
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Nadine Boers
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Frank H.J. van den Hoogen
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, and Department of Rheumatology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Alfons A. den Broeder
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, and Department of Rheumatology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Aatke van der Maas
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Rohrich DC, van de Wetering EHM, Rennings AJ, Arts EE, Meek IL, den Broeder AA, Fransen J, Popa CD. Younger age and female gender are determinants of underestimated cardiovascular risk in rheumatoid arthritis patients: a prospective cohort study. Arthritis Res Ther 2021; 23:2. [PMID: 33397472 PMCID: PMC7784252 DOI: 10.1186/s13075-020-02384-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2020] [Accepted: 12/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients have an increased cardiovascular (CV) risk. Here, we aimed to investigate whether gender and age are contributing to the misclassification of CV risk in RA patients. Methods Prospectively collected data on cardiovascular risk factors and incident events from the Nijmegen inception cohort were analyzed, with up to 10 years follow-up. Original as well as the EULAR-modified (M)_SCORE algorithms were used to calculate CV risk. Patients were stratified in deciles according to predicted risk; the Hosmer-Lemeshow test was used to check concordance between observed and predicted risk, in subgroups of gender and age. Results There were 863 RA patients included with 128 incident CV events. When using SCORE in the whole group, there was evidence of a discrepancy between the predicted and observed CV risk (H-L test p < 0.003), mainly present in the female subgroup (H-L test p < 0.001). Interestingly, 36% of females who developed an event belonged to the low CV risk group, whereas this was just 10% in RA males. When analyzing the subgroups based on age, a discrepancy was present only in the youngest patients (H-L test p < 0.001 in patients < 55 years) consisting of an underestimation of CV risk (5.3% predicted vs. 8.0% observed). Similar results were obtained when the M_SCORE was applied. Conclusion CV risk is especially underestimated in female and younger RA patients. This suggests that modifying the weight for the female gender and/or younger age in currently used CV risk algorithms might improve their predictive value in RA, contributing to better CV risk management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daphne C Rohrich
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Hengstdal nr. 3, 6574 NA, Ubbergen, The Netherlands
| | - Eline H M van de Wetering
- Department of Rheumatology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein 8, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Alexander J Rennings
- Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein 8, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Elke E Arts
- Department of Rheumatology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein 8, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Inger L Meek
- Department of Rheumatology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein 8, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Alfons A den Broeder
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Hengstdal nr. 3, 6574 NA, Ubbergen, The Netherlands
| | - Jaap Fransen
- Department of Rheumatology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein 8, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Calin D Popa
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Hengstdal nr. 3, 6574 NA, Ubbergen, The Netherlands. .,Department of Rheumatology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein 8, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Marsman DE, den Broeder N, Popa CD, den Broeder AA, van der Maas A. Seasonal influence on incidence of polymyalgia rheumatica: winter might be coming. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2021; 39 Suppl 128:19-20. [PMID: 33634778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2020] [Accepted: 10/13/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Diane E Marsman
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Nathan den Broeder
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Calin D Popa
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, and Department of Rheumatology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Alfons A den Broeder
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, and Department of Rheumatology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Aatke van der Maas
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Atalay S, van den Reek JMPA, den Broeder AA, van Vugt LJ, Otero ME, Njoo MD, Mommers JM, Ossenkoppele PM, Koetsier MI, Berends MA, van de Kerkhof PCM, Groenewoud HMM, Kievit W, de Jong EMGJ. Comparison of Tightly Controlled Dose Reduction of Biologics With Usual Care for Patients With Psoriasis: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Dermatol 2020; 156:393-400. [PMID: 32049319 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.4897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Importance Biologics revolutionized the treatment of psoriasis. Biologics are given in a fixed dose, but lower doses might be possible. Objective To investigate whether dose reduction (DR) of biologics in patients with stable psoriasis is noninferior to usual care (UC). Design, Setting, and Participants This pragmatic, open-label, prospective, controlled, noninferiority randomized clinical trial was conducted from March 1, 2016, to July 22, 2018, at 6 dermatology departments in the Netherlands. A total of 120 patients with plaque psoriasis and stable low disease activity who were receiving treatment with adalimumab, etanercept, or ustekinumab were studied. Interventions Patients were randomized 1:1 to DR (n = 60) or UC (n = 60). In the DR group, injection intervals were prolonged stepwise, leading to 67% and 50% of the original dose. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was between-group difference in disease activity corrected for baseline at 12 months compared with the predefined noninferiority margin of 0.5. Secondary outcomes were Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score and health-related quality of life (including Dermatology Life Quality Index [DLQI] and Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey scores), proportion of patients with short and persistent flares (defined as PASI and/or DLQI scores >5 for ≥3 months), and proportion of patients with successful dose tapering. Results Of 120 patients (mean [SD] age, 54.0 [13.2] years; 82 [68%] male), 2 patients were lost to follow-up, 2 patients had a protocol violation, and 5 patients had a protocol deviation, leaving 111 patients for the per-protocol analysis (53 in the DR group and 58 in the UC group). The median PASI scores at month 12 were 3.4 (interquartile range [IQR], 2.2-4.5) in the DR group and 2.1 (IQR, 0.6-3.6) in the UC group (mean difference, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.7-1.8). This indicates that noninferiority was not demonstrated for DR compared to UC. The median DLQI score at month 12 was 1.0 (IQR, 0.0-2.0) in the DR group and 0.0 (IQR, 0.0-2.0) in the UC group (mean difference, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.3-1.3), indicating noninferiority for DR compared with UC. No significant difference was found regarding persistent flares between groups (n = 5 in both groups). Twenty-eight patients (53%; 95% CI, 39%-67%) in the DR group tapered their dose successfully at 12 months. No severe adverse events related to the intervention occurred. Conclusions and Relevance In this trial, noninferiority was not demonstrated for DR of adalimumab, etanercept, and ustekinumab based on the PASI in patients with psoriasis compared with UC with the chosen noninferiority margin. However, the strategy was noninferior based on the DLQI. Dose tapering did not lead to persistent flares or safety issues. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02602925.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Selma Atalay
- Department of Dermatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Lieke J van Vugt
- Department of Dermatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Marisol E Otero
- Department of Dermatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Marcellus D Njoo
- Department of Dermatology, Ziekenhuis Groep Twente, Hengelo, the Netherlands
| | - Johannes M Mommers
- Department of Dermatology, Sint Anna Ziekenhuis, Geldrop, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Maartje A Berends
- Department of Dermatology, Slingelandziekenhuis, Doetinchem, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Wietske Kievit
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Elke M G J de Jong
- Department of Dermatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Atalay S, van den Reek JMPA, Otero ME, Njoo MD, Mommers JM, Ossenkoppele PM, Koetsier MI, Berends MM, van de Kerkhof PCM, Groenewoud HMM, den Broeder AA, de Jong EMGJ, Kievit W. Health Economic Consequences of a Tightly Controlled Dose Reduction Strategy for Adalimumab, Etanercept and Ustekinumab Compared with Standard Psoriasis Care: A Cost-utility Analysis of the CONDOR Study. Acta Derm Venereol 2020; 100:adv00340. [PMID: 33196101 PMCID: PMC9309701 DOI: 10.2340/00015555-3692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
A dose reduction strategy for adalimumab, etanercept and ustekinumab in patients with psoriasis who have stable and low disease activity has recently been compared with usual care in the CONDOR study (CONtrolled DOse Reduction) of biologics in patients with psoriasis with low disease activity. The aim of the current study was to perform a cost-utility analysis with a 12-month time horizon alongside this trial, using prospectively measured healthcare costs and quality-adjusted life years, based on Short-Form Six-Dimension utilities. Bootstrap analyses were used to calculate the decremental cost-utility ratio and the incremental net monetary benefit. The dose reduction strategy resulted in a mean cost saving of €3,820 (95th percentile –€3,099 to –€4,509) per patient over a period of 12 months. There was an 83% chance that dose reduction would result in a reduction in quality adjusted life years (mean –0.02 (95th percentile –0.06 to 0.02). In conclusion, dose reduction of biologics resulted in substantial cost savings with an acceptable reduction in quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Selma Atalay
- Department of Dermatology, Radboud university medical center, 6525 Nijmegen, The Netherlands. E-mail:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Workum JD, Huysmans FT, de Mast Q, den Broeder AA, Kramers CK. [Medication during severe infections]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2020; 164:D5039. [PMID: 33332031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Severe infectious diseases result in an increased volume of distribution. Renal function is usually impaired, but can in fact be increased early in the course of the disease. In renally cleared drugs with a small therapeutic index a dose reduction should take place or these medications should be temporarily discontinued. Renally cleared antibiotics may be subject to subtherapeutic levels of antibiotics, especially early in the course of the disease. Diuretics and RAAS inhibitors should usually be interrupted during acute illness; bèta-blockers should be continued. Statins can usually be continued. Paracetamol can usually be prescribed. NSAIDs, however, are almost always contra-indicated. Patients with chronic use of corticosteroids should receive a stress dose. There is no evidence to support discontinuing immunosuppressants. Platelet aggregation inhibitors and directly acting oral anticoagulants are continued, whereas coumarins should be monitored vigorously or substituted for low molecular weight heparins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - C Kees Kramers
- Radboudumc, Nijmegen. Afd. Farmacologie-Toxicologie
- Contact: C. (Kees) Kramers
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Jansen FM, Vavricka SR, den Broeder AA, de Jong EM, Hoentjen F, van Dop WA. Clinical management of the most common extra-intestinal manifestations in patients with inflammatory bowel disease focused on the joints, skin and eyes. United European Gastroenterol J 2020; 8:1031-1044. [PMID: 32921269 PMCID: PMC7724540 DOI: 10.1177/2050640620958902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Extra-intestinal manifestations (EIMs) of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) occur
frequently and contribute to morbidity and reduced quality of life. The
musculoskeletal, ocular and cutaneous organ systems are frequently involved in
IBD-related EIMs. By focusing on manifestations involving the joints, skin and
eyes, this review will discuss the most common clinically relevant and
burdensome EIMs that affect IBD patients, and strives for early recognition,
adequate treatment and timely referral. For this purpose, we aimed to create a
comprehensive overview on this topic, with the main focus on the treatment of
reactive and associated EIMs, including spondyloarthropathies, pyoderma
gangrenosum, erythema nodosum, psoriasis and anterior uveitis. The recently
developed biologicals enable simultaneous treatment of inflammatory disorders.
This review can be used as a helpful guide in daily clinical practice for
physicians who are involved in the treatment of IBD patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fenna M Jansen
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Stephan R Vavricka
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Alfons A den Broeder
- ³Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Elke Mgj de Jong
- Department of Medicine, Division of Dermatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Hoentjen
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Willemijn A van Dop
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Geurts-Voerman GE, Verhoef LM, van den Bemt BJF, den Broeder AA. The pharmacological and clinical aspects behind dose loading of biological disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in auto-immune rheumatic diseases (AIRDs): rationale and systematic narrative review of clinical evidence. BMC Rheumatol 2020; 4:37. [PMID: 32743343 PMCID: PMC7385956 DOI: 10.1186/s41927-020-00130-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2019] [Accepted: 04/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Dose loading of biological disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in auto-immune rheumatic diseases (AIRDs) is performed to achieve steady state drug concentrations earlier after treatment start compared to dosing regimens without loading. Although loading inherently results in increased costs, treatment targets in terms of reduced disease activity may be achieved at an earlier state. It is an interesting topic that, surprisingly, has not received much attention in literature. Methods In this review, we aimed at providing a theoretical description of the pharmacodynamic / -kinetic rationale for dose loading of bDMARDs in AIRDs and to systematically review the clinical evidence on the effectiveness of dose loading on disease activity in AIRDs. Results Only a small number of studies (n = 5) has been published comparing the effectiveness of dose loading versus a regimen without dose loading of bDMARDs in AIRDs, addressing abatacept (n = 2), certolizumab pegol (n = 1), and secukinumab (n = 2). These studies provide insufficient evidence on superiority of dose loading in terms of disease activity compared to a dosing regimen without loading, while safety issues might be comparable. Conclusions Although dose loading is commonly adopted for several bDMARDs in AIRDs, scientific evidence on its effectiveness and safety is surprisingly scarce and does not suggest superiority compared to a regimen without dose loading. More research in this field, also with regard to the pharmaco-economic consequences of dose loading, is urgently needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lise M Verhoef
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, PO Box 9011, 6500 GM Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Bart J F van den Bemt
- Department of Pharmacy, Sint Maartenskliniek, PO Box 9011, 6500 GM Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Pharmacy, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Alfons A den Broeder
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, PO Box 9011, 6500 GM Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|