Developing a novel patient-reported outcome measure for patients with prostate cancer receiving radionuclide therapy: The FACT-RNT

130

Background: The field of targeted radionuclide therapy (RNT) for prostate cancer (PC) is growing rapidly with recent FDA approval of the first lutetium-177-PSMA-ligand. Commonly used patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures were originally designed to assess the impacts of traditional therapies (e.g., chemotherapy, surgery). We aimed to develop the first PRO measure for PC patients receiving RNT. Methods: We used a multi-step approach based on input from experts and patients. We identified symptoms and toxicities potentially relevant in the context of RNT for PC from a literature review of published trials and interviews with PC patients who had received RNT, caregivers of RNT recipients, and clinicians. We identified items to include in the measure from the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) item library. Finally, we reviewed, refined, and finalized the new measure. Results: Potentially relevant symptoms/toxicities were identified by reviewing published trials (e.g., xerostomia, nausea). Interviews with PC patients who received RNT (n=29), caregivers (n=14), and clinicians (n=11) yielded additional symptoms/toxicities (e.g., fatigue, constipation). After selecting a broad and comprehensive list of items from the FACIT item library, we refined the list based on input from 9 experts in the field of RNTs and PROs from 5 institutions. Patients who received RNT for PC (n=11) reviewed the draft measure and confirmed items were relevant to RNT recipients and comprehensible. This resulted in a brief 15-item measure deemed by key stakeholders to be relevant and useful in the context of RNT for PC. Conclusions: The FACT-RNT (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Radionuclide Therapy) is a PRO new measure for RNT recipients developed through multi-step collaboration with patients, caregivers, clinicians, and international experts. The FACT-RNT can be used in RNT clinical trials and real-world settings.

Developing a novel patient reported outcomes measure for prostate cancer patients receiving radionuclide therapy

The field of radionuclide therapy (RNT) for prostate cancer (PC) is growing rapidly with recent FDA approval of the first Lutetium-177-PSMA-ligand. Current patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures were designed to assess impacts of chemotherapy or surgery. We aimed to develop the first PRO measure for PC patients receiving RNT. Methods: First, we identified relevant symptoms/toxicities by reviewing published trials and interviews with PC patients receiving RNT (n = 29), caregivers (n = 14), and clinicians (n = 11). Second, we selected items for measure inclusion. Third, we refined the item list with input from experts in RNTs and PROs. Fourth, we finalized the FACT-RNT with patient input. Results: This multi-step process yielded a brief 15-item measure deemed by key stakeholders to be relevant and useful in the context of RNT for PC. Conclusion: The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Radionuclide Therapy (FACT-RNT) is a new standardized tool to monitor relevant symptoms/toxicities in RNT trials and real-world settings.

18F-FLT PET/CT as a Prognostic Imaging Biomarker of Disease-Specific Survival in Patients with Primary Soft-Tissue Sarcoma

The purpose of this study was to evaluate ¹⁸F-FLT PET/CT as an early prognostic imaging biomarker of long-term overall survival and disease-specific survival (DSS) in soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and surgical resection. Methods: This was a 10-y follow-up of a previous single-center, single-arm prospective clinical trial. Patients underwent ¹⁸F-FLT PET/CT before treatment (PET1) and after NAT (PET2). Posttreatment pathology specimens were assessed for tumor necrosis or fibrosis and for Ki-67 and thymidine kinase 1 expression. Maximally selected cutoffs for PET and histopathologic factors were applied. Survival was calculated from the date of subject consent to the date of death or last follow-up. Results: The study population consisted of 26 patients who underwent PET1; 16 of the 26 with primary STS underwent PET2. Thirteen deaths occurred during a median follow-up of 104 mo. In the overall cohort, overall survival was longer in patients with a low than a high PET1 tumor SUV_max (dichotomized by an SUV_max of ≥8.5 vs. <8.5: not yet reached vs. 49.7 mo; P = 0.0064). DSS showed a trend toward significance (P = 0.096). In a subanalysis of primary STS, DSS was significantly longer in patients with a low PET1 tumor SUV_max (dichotomized by an SUV_max of ≥8 vs. <8; P = 0.034). There were no significant ¹⁸F-FLT PET response thresholds corresponding to DSS or overall survival after NAT at PET2. Conclusion:¹⁸F-FLT PET may serve as a prognostic baseline imaging biomarker for DSS in patients with primary STS.

A 3-Year-Old Girl With Recent Onset of Seizures and Asymmetric Hypermetabolic Activity on 18F-FDG PET/CT

ABSTRACT

A 3-year-old, previously healthy girl started having clusters of seizures, not responsive to multiple antiepileptic medications. High-dose prednisone and intravenous immunoglobulin could partially control the seizures. Lumbar puncture and CT were normal. An MRI showed right hemispheric injury and atrophy compatible with clinical suspicion of Rasmussen encephalitis. Neurological 18F-FDG PET/CT demonstrated asymmetric hypermetabolic activity in the right frontal and parietal lobes compatible with active inflammation. The patient underwent a right functional hemispherectomy, which confirmed clinical suspicion of Rasmussen encephalitis. During the follow-up, the patient has continued to take phenobarbital and levetiracetam (Keppra), with no recurrence of seizures.

Esmolol versus diltiazem in the treatment of postoperative atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter after open heart surgery

BACKGROUND

Supraventricular tachyarrhythmias are common after open heart surgery. Possible causative factors for these arrhythmias include operative trauma, atrial ischemia, electrolyte imbalances, pericardial irritation, and excess catecholamines. Two agents commonly used to control ventricular rate in atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter (AF/AFL) are beta-blockers and calcium channel blockers.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This randomized study was designed to compare the safety and efficacy of intravenous diltiazem versus intravenous esmolol in patients with postoperative AF/AFL after coronary bypass surgery and/or valve replacement surgery. A comparative cost analysis was also performed. Thirty patients received either esmolol (n = 15) or diltiazem (n = 15) for AF/AFL. During the first 6 hours of treatment, 66.6% of esmolol-treated patients converted to sinus rhythm compared with 13.3% of the diltiazem-treated patients (P <.05). At 24 hours, 66.6% of the diltiazem group converted to SR compared with 80% of the esmolol group (not significant). Drug-induced side effects, time to rate control (<90 beats/min), number of patients requiring cardioversion, and length of hospitalization were similar for the two groups. The drug cost/successfully treated patient for esmolol versus diltiazem was $254 versus $437 at 6 hours and $529 versus $262 at 24 hours.

CONCLUSIONS

Although this is a small study, it suggests that esmolol is more effective in converting patients to normal sinus rhythm than diltiazem during the initial dosing period. No differences in conversion rates were observed between the two groups after 24 hours. Additional studies are needed to confirm whether esmolol is the initial drug of choice in patients with postoperative AF/AFL after coronary bypass surgery.

Time to treatment and cost of thrombolysis: a multicenter comparison of tPA and rPA

STUDY OBJECTIVE

This study reports a comparison of the time to treatment and cost of administration of alteplase (tPA) and reteplase (rPA) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI).

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Hospital emergency department.

INTERVENTIONS

A retrospective chart review of 500 MI patients who received alteplase or reteplase was performed. A comparison of time from presentation in the emergency department to start of treatment was performed, and the cost of administration of drugs, including cost of supplies, monitoring time, and IV line complications, was calculated for each drug.

RESULTS

The time from presentation to start of treatment was significantly shorter for reteplase than alteplase (51 vs 34 min). This difference resulted from a shorter decision to treat to start of treatment time for reteplase (11 min) compared to alteplase (31 min). The cost of administration of alteplase ranged from $136 to $184 per patient, while the cost of administration of reteplase ranged from $87 to $120 per patient.

DISCUSSION

Given the similar safety and efficacy profiles of these thrombolytic agents, the advantages of reteplase in speed of administration and the reduction in cost should be considered when making formulary and drug product selection decisions.). Abbreviated Abstract. Alteplase (tPA) and reteplase (rPA) were compared in a retrospective review of 500 patients. rPA was associated with 17 minute time savings from presentation-to-treatment compared to tPA. rPA was also associated with a per patient cost savings $49 to $64 compared to tPA. The time and cost advantages of rPA should be considered when making drug product selection decisions.