Abstract
CONTEXT
Brain injury is common in preterm infants, and predictors of neurodevelopmental outcome are relevant.
OBJECTIVE
To assess the prognostic test accuracy of the background activity of the EEG recorded as amplitude-integrated EEG (aEEG) or conventional EEG early in life in preterm infants for predicting neurodevelopmental outcome.
DATA SOURCES
The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature.
STUDY SELECTION
We included observational studies that had obtained an aEEG or EEG within 7 days of life in preterm infants and reported neurodevelopmental outcomes 1 to 10 years later.
DATA EXTRACTION
Two reviewers independently performed data extraction with regard to participants, prognostic testing, and outcomes.
RESULTS
Thirteen observational studies with a total of 1181 infants were included. A meta-analysis was performed based on 3 studies (267 infants). Any aEEG background abnormality was a predictor of abnormal outcome. For prediction of a developmental quotient <70 points, cerebral palsy, or death, the pooled sensitivity was 0.83 (95% confidence interval, 0.69-0.92) and specificity 0.83 (95% confidence interval, 0.77-0.87).
LIMITATIONS
All studies were at high risk of bias. Heterogeneity was evident among the studies with regard to the investigated aEEG and EEG variables, neurodevelopmental outcomes, and cutoff values.
CONCLUSIONS
aEEG or EEG recorded within the first 7 days of life in preterm infants may have potential as a predictor for later neurodevelopmental outcome. We need high-quality studies to confirm these findings. Meanwhile, the prognostic value of aEEG and EEG should be used only as a scientific tool.
Collapse