Long time response with chemotherapy in ROS1 NSCLC patient with unusual metastatic site

During the last decade the therapeutic landscape of Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) has profoundly changed with the identification of actionable genetic alterations that defined molecularly selected subgroups of patients with specific clinic-pathological characteristics and increased sensitivity to specific targeted agents. The presence of ROS1 rearrangements defines a small subgroup of lung adenocarcinomas (∼1-2%) with peculiar clinic-pathological characteristics and increased sensitivity to Crizotinib. It has been reported that ROS1-tranlslocated NSCLCs may also respond well to Pemetrexed-based chemotherapy. Moreover, patients with oncogene-addicted NSCLC may present peculiar pattern of metastatization and, in some instances, are associated with unusual site of metastases. Herein, we present a case of a young woman with bilateral ovarian metastases from a ROS1-positive adenocarcinoma of the lung with a lengthy progression-free survival on Pemetrexed-containing chemotherapy.

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in patients with inoperable meningiomas: our experience and review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

Few studies describe peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) using (90)Y- or (177)Lu-labeled peptides in patients with recurrent meningiomas. No clinical data about (111)In-Pentetreotide in such patients are available. We report on (111)In-Pentetreotide therapy in patients with inoperable meningiomas and review the literature about PRRT of meningiomas.

METHODS

We reviewed clinical records of 8 patients with meningioma/meningiomatosis showing high (111)In-Pentetreotide uptake on pretherapy scintigraphy who were treated with at least one cycle of (111)In-Pentetreotide. In 2 patients, a cocktail of (111)In-Pentetreotide and beta-emitting radiolabeled peptides had been administered.

RESULTS

No patient experienced acute toxicity, neurological or renal function impairment. Mild transient bone marrow toxicity was observed in 4 patients. Objective partial response was observed in 2 patients, stable disease in 5 and disease progression in one. There were no statistically significant correlations between objective response and patient age, tumor WHO grade, baseline Karnofsky performance score, (111)In-Pentetreotide tumoral uptake grade, tumor/nontumor ratio, disease state at baseline, and cumulative dose.

CONCLUSIONS

In consideration of its efficacy and the lack of significant toxicity, PRRT of meningiomas using (111)In-Pentetreotide could be proposed even nowadays when the use of (177)Lu- or (90)Y-labeled peptides seems unsafe, namely in patients with renal impairment/toxicity.

First demonstration of the effectiveness of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with 111In-DTPA-octreotide in a giant PRL-secreting pituitary adenoma resistant to conventional treatment

In prolactin-secreting giant adenomas, cabergoline treatment is the first line approach. Surgery and/or radiotherapy are indicated when the tumour is resistant to medical treatment and continues growing, causing visual field impairment. Data concerning other therapeutic approach are scanty. Although PRL-secreting tumours may express somatostatin receptors type 2, 3 and 5, somatostatin analogs treatment is generally ineffective and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has never been reported. A 58 year-old woman complaining of severe neurological symptoms caused by a giant prolactinoma, relapsing after surgery and not-responding to dopamine-agonists and octreotide LAR treatment, underwent four cycles of PRRT with 111-Indium-DTPA-octreotide with remarkable tumour shrinkage and a significant improvement in clinical conditions. No side effects were reported. This is the first report on the effectiveness and safety of PRRT with radio-labelled somatostatin analogs in a patient with aggressive giant prolactinoma resistant to conventional treatment.

[186Re]HEDP in the palliation of painful bone metastases from cancers other than prostate and breast

AIM

Palliative therapy using [186Re]hydroxyethylidene diphosphonate (HEDP) has been widely tested in patients with bone metastases from prostate and breast cancers. Whereas, to the best of our knowledge, only few cases of bone metastases from tumors other than prostate and breast treated with [186Re]HEDP have been reported. The aim of this paper is to report our experience with 186Re-HEDP in the palliation of painful bone metastases from tumors other than prostate and breast.

METHODS

In this study 41 patients (17 non-small cell lung cancer-NSCLC, 1 small cell lung cancer, 1 lung neuroendocrine tumor, 8 bladder cancer, 3 kidney cancer, 3 gastric cancer, 1 uterine carcinoma, 1 colon cancer, 1 rhinopharynx carcinoma, 1 medullary thyroid carcinoma, 1 ovarian cancer, 1 esophagus cancer, 2 carcinoma of unknown origin) are evaluated. All patients had lesions with increased [99mTc]MDP uptake and none had radiological findings of mainly osteolytic lesions. A total of 46 therapeutic cycles were performed using a [186Re]HEDP activity of 1 295 MBq for each administration. After treatment, patients were followed up for 3 months or to the time of pain recurrence (if longer than 3 months). Responses were evaluated using a validated method considering the modifications of pain index, analgesic intake and performance status.

RESULTS

Treatment efficacy was complete in 49% (20/41) of patients, partial in 36% (15/41) and negative in 15% (6/41). Namely, we observed 35% (6/17) complete, 41% (7/17) partial and 24% (4/17) negative responses in patients with NSCLC and 63% (5/8) complete, 25% (2/8) partial and 12% (1/8) negative responses in patients affected by bladder cancer. The median duration of pain relief in responder patients was 10 weeks. A mild platelet toxicity occurred in 32% (13/41) of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Pain palliation with [186Re]HEDP seems highly effective and safe also in patients with bone metastases from cancers other than prostate and breast. Patients who can benefit from the treatment with [186Re]HEDP can be selected on the basis of [99mTc]MDP bone scan and radiological examination findings.

Evaluation of Chromogranin A Expression in Patients with Non-Neuroendocrine Tumours

BACKGROUND

Chromogranin A (CgA) is well established as a serum marker for neuroendocrine tumours and has also been associated with some non-neuroendocrine tumours, suggesting a possible role for somatostatin analogues such as octreotide in the treatment of these tumours.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to measure plasma CgA levels in patients with various non-neuroendocrine tumours in order to identify those patients who might benefit from octreotide therapy.

METHODS

Plasma CgA levels were tested in 151 patients with metastatic non-neuroendocrine tumours. Patients with highly elevated levels were assessed by OctreoScan scintigraphy to determine their somatostatin receptor status, and those with positive results were offered treatment with the somatostatin analogue octreotide, 20 mg every 4 weeks, and followed up every 3 months.

RESULTS

CgA levels were elevated (>18 U/L) in 34/72 patients with breast cancer, 11/21 with lung cancer, 10/28 with gastrointestinal cancer, 7/12 with gynaecological cancer, 6/9 with genitourinary cancer, 5/5 with haematological cancer, and 3/4 with head and neck cancer. Eight patients with CgA levels >150 U/L underwent scintigraphy, five of whom (two colorectal, two prostate, one non-small cell lung cancer [NSCLC]) showed positive results and received treatment with octreotide. Follow-up for a mean 12-16 months showed improvements in biochemical parameters, cenesthesis and quality of life.

CONCLUSION

CgA levels were found to be elevated in approximately 50% of patients with non-neuroendocrine tumours. Further studies are required to determine the value of CgA as a marker for non-neuroendocrine tumours and the role of somatostatin analogues as a treatment for these tumour types.

Timing of examination affects reliability of 99mTc-methoxyisobutylisonitrile SPECT in distinguishing neoplastic from nonneoplastic brain hematomas

99mTc-methoxyisobutylisonitrile (MIBI) SPECT has been reported to be 100% sensitive and specific in the early differential diagnosis between neoplastic and nonneoplastic intraparenchymal cerebral hemorrhage (ICH), because nonneoplastic ICH does not show 99mTc-MIBI accumulation on SPECT examinations performed within 48 h from the onset of clinical symptoms. The aims of this study were to investigate the behavior of nonneoplastic ICH on more delayed 99mTc-MIBI SPECT examinations and to determine how the timing of examination affects the reliability of 99mTc-MIBI SPECT in differentiating neoplastic from nonneoplastic ICH.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 32 patients with acute neurologic deterioration caused by nontraumatic ICH. Patients were randomly allocated to 4 groups of 8 patients each. Patients in the first, second, third, and fourth groups underwent 99mTc-MIBI SPECT 2, 5, 10, and 30 d, respectively, after the onset of clinical deterioration. Furthermore, patients in the first group underwent a second (99m)Tc-MIBI SPECT examination at 30 d. 99mTc-MIBI SPECT studies were visually and semiquantitatively evaluated. Patients were followed up to confirm the nonneoplastic etiology of the ICH.

RESULTS

Two of the 32 studied patients, 1 in the second and 1 in the fourth group, were excluded because the ICH turned out to be related to a neoplastic lesion. Visual analysis showed no 99mTc-MIBI uptake in any patient studied at 2 d, whereas increased radiotracer uptake was found in 1 (14%) of 7, 5 (62.5%) of 8, and 5 (71%) of 7 patients studied 5, 10, and 30 d, respectively, after clinical deterioration. Moreover, with the semiquantitative analysis, a statistically significant difference was found among 99mTc-MIBI indices in the 4 groups (P = 0.0011). All patients in group 1 showed a significant 99mTc-MIBI accumulation when studied at 30 d.

CONCLUSION

Nonneoplastic ICH, showing no 99mTc-MIBI uptake within 2 d, can show 99mTc-MIBI accumulation on more delayed imaging. 99mTc-MIBI SPECT can clearly differentiate between neoplastic and nonneoplastic ICH only during the acute phase. Our findings suggest that examination be performed early after the onset of symptoms and certainly within 5 d.

[Metal or plastic endoprostheses in malignant obstructive jaundice. A randomized and prospective comparison]

In a prospective randomized trial 58 patients (24 men, 34 women, mean age 67 +/- 13 [42-89] years) with inoperable malignant jaundice were treated with synthetic (S; n = 29) or expanding metal endoprostheses (M; n = 29). After endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography patients were divided into a group with hilar (K: n = 7; M: n = 6) or distal involvement (K: n = 22, M: n = 23). In two cases with hilar involvement (28%) a synthetic endoprosthesis could not be implanted, while early prosthesis occlusion (after 2 days) was observed in one case. But in this group it was possible to implant all metal stents. In the group with distal involvement both synthetic and metal endoprostheses were successfully implanted. In the M group the proportion of patients with prosthesis failure (13.6%) was significantly higher than in the S subgroup (40.9%). The cholangitis incidence was 9% in the M group, significantly less (P less than 0.05) than in the K group (40.9%). Duration of hospital stay to treat prosthesis-related complications was significantly less in the M group (average 2.9 days) than the K group (12.9 days). It would be a great advance in palliative tumour treatment if it were possible significantly to reduce, by means of metal stents, the incidence of late cholangitis and the duration of hospital stay necessary to treat late complications. But improvement in the technique of implanting metal stents would be essential before their general use in distal lesions can be recommended.