1
|
Fowler MA, Wong JB, Harrison AL. Oxidative physiology of two small and highly migratory Arctic seabirds: Arctic terns ( Sterna paradisaea) and long-tailed jaegers ( Stercorarius longicaudus). Conserv Physiol 2023; 11:coad060. [PMID: 37916041 PMCID: PMC10616233 DOI: 10.1093/conphys/coad060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2022] [Revised: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023]
Abstract
Arctic ecosystems are changing rapidly. The tundra supports nesting migratory seabirds that spend most of their year over the ocean. Migrations are demanding, but it is unclear how physiological capability may equip organisms to respond to their changing environments. For two migratory seabird species nesting in Alaska, USA, the Arctic tern (n = 10) and the long-tailed jaeger (n = 8), we compared oxidative physiology and aerobic capacity measured during incubation and we recorded individual movement paths using electronic tracking tags. Within species, we hypothesized that individuals with longer-distance migrations would show higher oxidative stress and display better aerobic capacity than shorter-distance migrants. We examined blood parameters relative to subsequent fall migration in jaegers and relative to previous spring migration in terns. We present the first measurements of oxidative stress in these species and the first migratory movements of long-tailed jaegers in the Pacific Ocean. Arctic terns displayed positive correlation of oxidative variables, or better integration than jaegers. Relative to physiological sampling, pre-breeding northward migration data were available for terns and post-breeding southward data were available for jaegers. Terns reached a farther maximum distance from the colony than jaegers (16 199 ± 275 km versus 10 947 ± 950 km) and rate of travel northward (447 ± 41.8 km/day) was positively correlated with hematocrit, but we found no other relationships. In jaegers, there were no relationships between individuals' physiology and southward rate of travel (193 ± 52.3 km/day) or migratory distance. While it is not clear whether the much longer migrations of the terns is related to their better integration, or to another factor, our results spark hypotheses that could be evaluated through a controlled phylogenetic study. Species with better integration may be less susceptible to environmental factors that increase oxidative stress, including thermal challenges or changes in prey distribution as the Arctic climate changes rapidly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melinda A. Fowler
- Department of Biology/Chemistry. Springfield College, 263 Alden Street, Springfield, MA 01109 USA
| | - Joanna B. Wong
- Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada
- Department of Bird Migration, Swiss Ornithological Institute, 6204 Sempach, Switzerland
| | - Autumn-Lynn Harrison
- Smithsonian‘s National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute, Migratory Bird Center, 3001 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Washington, DC. 20008 USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Davidson SC, Bohrer G, Gurarie E, LaPoint S, Mahoney PJ, Boelman NT, Eitel JUH, Prugh LR, Vierling LA, Jennewein J, Grier E, Couriot O, Kelly AP, Meddens AJH, Oliver RY, Kays R, Wikelski M, Aarvak T, Ackerman JT, Alves JA, Bayne E, Bedrosian B, Belant JL, Berdahl AM, Berlin AM, Berteaux D, Bêty J, Boiko D, Booms TL, Borg BL, Boutin S, Boyd WS, Brides K, Brown S, Bulyuk VN, Burnham KK, Cabot D, Casazza M, Christie K, Craig EH, Davis SE, Davison T, Demma D, DeSorbo CR, Dixon A, Domenech R, Eichhorn G, Elliott K, Evenson JR, Exo KM, Ferguson SH, Fiedler W, Fisk A, Fort J, Franke A, Fuller MR, Garthe S, Gauthier G, Gilchrist G, Glazov P, Gray CE, Grémillet D, Griffin L, Hallworth MT, Harrison AL, Hennin HL, Hipfner JM, Hodson J, Johnson JA, Joly K, Jones K, Katzner TE, Kidd JW, Knight EC, Kochert MN, Kölzsch A, Kruckenberg H, Lagassé BJ, Lai S, Lamarre JF, Lanctot RB, Larter NC, Latham ADM, Latty CJ, Lawler JP, Léandri-Breton DJ, Lee H, Lewis SB, Love OP, Madsen J, Maftei M, Mallory ML, Mangipane B, Markovets MY, Marra PP, McGuire R, McIntyre CL, McKinnon EA, Miller TA, Moonen S, Mu T, Müskens GJDM, Ng J, Nicholson KL, Øien IJ, Overton C, Owen PA, Patterson A, Petersen A, Pokrovsky I, Powell LL, Prieto R, Quillfeldt P, Rausch J, Russell K, Saalfeld ST, Schekkerman H, Schmutz JA, Schwemmer P, Seip DR, Shreading A, Silva MA, Smith BW, Smith F, Smith JP, Snell KRS, Sokolov A, Sokolov V, Solovyeva DV, Sorum MS, Tertitski G, Therrien JF, Thorup K, Tibbitts TL, Tulp I, Uher-Koch BD, van Bemmelen RSA, Van Wilgenburg S, Von Duyke AL, Watson JL, Watts BD, Williams JA, Wilson MT, Wright JR, Yates MA, Yurkowski DJ, Žydelis R, Hebblewhite M. Ecological insights from three decades of animal movement tracking across a changing Arctic. Science 2020; 370:712-715. [PMID: 33154141 DOI: 10.1126/science.abb7080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2020] [Revised: 03/16/2020] [Accepted: 09/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
The Arctic is entering a new ecological state, with alarming consequences for humanity. Animal-borne sensors offer a window into these changes. Although substantial animal tracking data from the Arctic and subarctic exist, most are difficult to discover and access. Here, we present the new Arctic Animal Movement Archive (AAMA), a growing collection of more than 200 standardized terrestrial and marine animal tracking studies from 1991 to the present. The AAMA supports public data discovery, preserves fundamental baseline data for the future, and facilitates efficient, collaborative data analysis. With AAMA-based case studies, we document climatic influences on the migration phenology of eagles, geographic differences in the adaptive response of caribou reproductive phenology to climate change, and species-specific changes in terrestrial mammal movement rates in response to increasing temperature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah C Davidson
- Department of Civil, Environmental and Geodetic Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.,Department of Migration, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, Radolfzell, Germany.,Centre for the Advanced Study of Collective Behaviour, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany
| | - Gil Bohrer
- Department of Civil, Environmental and Geodetic Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
| | - Eliezer Gurarie
- Department of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.,Wildlife Biology Program, Department of Ecosystem and Conservation Sciences, W.A. Franke College of Forestry and Conservation, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA
| | - Scott LaPoint
- Department of Migration, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, Radolfzell, Germany.,Black Rock Forest, 65 Reservoir Road, Cornwall, NY, USA.,Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, NY, USA
| | - Peter J Mahoney
- School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Natalie T Boelman
- Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, NY, USA
| | - Jan U H Eitel
- Department of Natural Resources and Society, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA
| | - Laura R Prugh
- School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Lee A Vierling
- Department of Natural Resources and Society, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA
| | - Jyoti Jennewein
- Department of Natural Resources and Society, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA
| | - Emma Grier
- Department of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
| | - Ophélie Couriot
- Department of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.,National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center, Annapolis, MD, USA
| | - Allicia P Kelly
- Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Government of the Northwest Territories, Fort Smith, NT, Canada
| | - Arjan J H Meddens
- School of the Environment, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA
| | - Ruth Y Oliver
- Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, NY, USA.,Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.,Center for Biodiversity and Global Change, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Roland Kays
- College of Natural Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
| | - Martin Wikelski
- Department of Migration, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, Radolfzell, Germany.,Centre for the Advanced Study of Collective Behaviour, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany
| | | | - Joshua T Ackerman
- U.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, Dixon Field Station, Dixon, CA, USA
| | - José A Alves
- Department of Biology & CESAM, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.,South Iceland Research Centre, University of Iceland, Laugarvatn, Iceland
| | - Erin Bayne
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | | | - Jerrold L Belant
- Global Wildlife Conservation Center, College of Environmental Science and Forestry, State University of New York, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - Andrew M Berdahl
- School of Aquatic & Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Alicia M Berlin
- U.S. Geological Survey, Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, MD, USA
| | - Dominique Berteaux
- Centre d'études nordiques, Université du Québec à Rimouski, Rimouski, QC, Canada
| | - Joël Bêty
- Centre d'études nordiques, Université du Québec à Rimouski, Rimouski, QC, Canada
| | - Dmitrijs Boiko
- Latvian National Museum of Natural History, Riga, Latvia.,Institute of Biology, University of Latvia, Salaspils, Latvia.,Latvian Swan Research Society, Kalnciems, Latvia
| | | | - Bridget L Borg
- National Park Service, Denali National Park and Preserve, Denali Park, AK, USA
| | - Stan Boutin
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - W Sean Boyd
- Science & Technology Branch, Environment & Climate Change Canada, Delta, BC, Canada
| | | | | | - Victor N Bulyuk
- Biological Station Rybachy, Zoological Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | | | - David Cabot
- School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Michael Casazza
- U.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, Dixon Field Station, Dixon, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Tracy Davison
- Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Government of the Northwest Territories, Inuvik, NT, Canada
| | | | | | - Andrew Dixon
- Reneco International Wildlife Consultants, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | | | - Götz Eichhorn
- Vogeltrekstation-Dutch Centre for Avian Migration and Demography, Wageningen, Netherlands.,Department of Animal Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW), Wageningen, Netherlands
| | - Kyle Elliott
- Department of Natural Resource Sciences, McGill University, Ste Anne-de-Bellevue, QC, Canada
| | | | - Klaus-Michael Exo
- Institute for Avian Research "Vogelwarte Helgoland," Wilhelmshaven, Germany
| | | | - Wolfgang Fiedler
- Department of Migration, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, Radolfzell, Germany.,Centre for the Advanced Study of Collective Behaviour, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany
| | - Aaron Fisk
- Great Lakes Institute for Environmental Research, School of the Environment, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, Canada
| | - Jérôme Fort
- Littoral Environnement et Sociétés (LIENSs), CNRS, La Rochelle University, La Rochelle, France
| | - Alastair Franke
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.,Arctic Raptor Project, Rankin Inlet, NU, Canada
| | - Mark R Fuller
- Boise State University, Raptor Research Center, Boise, ID, USA
| | - Stefan Garthe
- Research and Technology Centre (FTZ), Kiel University, Büsum, Germany
| | - Gilles Gauthier
- Département de Biologie & Centre d'Études Nordiques, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - Grant Gilchrist
- Environment & Climate Change Canada, National Wildlife Research Centre, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Petr Glazov
- Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Carrie E Gray
- School of Biology and Ecology, University of Maine, Orono, ME, USA
| | - David Grémillet
- Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé, CNRS, La Rochelle University, Villiers en Bois, France.,Percy Fitzpatrick Institute of African Ornithology, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, South Africa
| | | | - Michael T Hallworth
- Migratory Bird Center, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological Park, Washington DC, USA.,Northeast Climate Adaptation Science Center, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA
| | - Autumn-Lynn Harrison
- Migratory Bird Center, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological Park, Washington DC, USA
| | - Holly L Hennin
- Science & Technology Branch, Environment & Climate Change Canada, Delta, BC, Canada.,Department of Integrative Biology, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, Canada
| | - J Mark Hipfner
- Environment & Climate Change Canada, Pacific Wildlife Research Centre, Delta, BC, Canada
| | - James Hodson
- Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Government of the Northwest Territories, Yellowknife, NT, Canada
| | - James A Johnson
- U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Migratory Bird Management, Anchorage, AK, USA
| | - Kyle Joly
- National Park Service, Gates of the Arctic National Park & Preserve, Fairbanks, AK, USA
| | | | - Todd E Katzner
- U.S. Geological Survey, Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center, Boise, ID, USA
| | | | - Elly C Knight
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Michael N Kochert
- U.S. Geological Survey, Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center, Boise, ID, USA
| | - Andrea Kölzsch
- Department of Migration, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, Radolfzell, Germany.,Centre for the Advanced Study of Collective Behaviour, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.,Institute for Wetlands and Waterbird Research e.V., Verden (Aller), Germany
| | - Helmut Kruckenberg
- Institute for Wetlands and Waterbird Research e.V., Verden (Aller), Germany
| | - Benjamin J Lagassé
- Department of Integrative Biology, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Sandra Lai
- Centre d'études nordiques, Université du Québec à Rimouski, Rimouski, QC, Canada
| | | | - Richard B Lanctot
- U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Migratory Bird Management, Anchorage, AK, USA
| | - Nicholas C Larter
- Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Government of the Northwest Territories, Fort Simpson, NT, Canada
| | - A David M Latham
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.,Manaaki Whenua-Landcare Research, Lincoln, New Zealand
| | - Christopher J Latty
- U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, Fairbanks, AK, USA
| | - James P Lawler
- National Park Service, Alaska Inventory and Monitoring Program, Anchorage, AK, USA
| | | | - Hansoo Lee
- Korea Institute of Environmental Ecology, Yuseonggu, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | | | - Oliver P Love
- Department of Integrative Biology, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, Canada
| | - Jesper Madsen
- Department of Bioscience-Kalø, Aarhus University, Rønde, Denmark
| | - Mark Maftei
- High Arctic Gull Research Group, Bamfield, BC, Canada
| | - Mark L Mallory
- Biology Department, Acadia University, Wolfville, NS, Canada
| | - Buck Mangipane
- National Park Service, Lake Clark National Park and Preserve, Anchorage, AK, USA
| | - Mikhail Y Markovets
- Biological Station Rybachy, Zoological Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Peter P Marra
- Department of Biology and the McCourt School of Public Policy, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Rebecca McGuire
- Wildlife Conservation Society, Arctic Beringia Program, Fairbanks, AK, USA
| | - Carol L McIntyre
- National Park Service, Denali National Park and Preserve, Denali Park, AK, USA
| | | | - Tricia A Miller
- Conservation Science Global, Inc., West Cape May, NJ, USA.,Division of Forestry and Natural Resources, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - Sander Moonen
- Institute for Avian Research "Vogelwarte Helgoland," Wilhelmshaven, Germany
| | - Tong Mu
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Gerhard J D M Müskens
- Wageningen Environmental Research, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands
| | - Janet Ng
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | | | | | - Cory Overton
- U.S. Geological Survey, Western Ecological Research Center, Dixon Field Station, Dixon, CA, USA
| | - Patricia A Owen
- National Park Service, Denali National Park and Preserve, Denali Park, AK, USA
| | - Allison Patterson
- Department of Natural Resource Sciences, McGill University, Ste Anne-de-Bellevue, QC, Canada
| | | | - Ivan Pokrovsky
- Department of Migration, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, Radolfzell, Germany.,Laboratory of Ornithology, Institute of Biological Problems of the North FEB RAS, Magadan, Russia.,Arctic Research Station of Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology UB, RAS, Labytnangi, Yamal-Nenets Autonomous District, Russia
| | - Luke L Powell
- Migratory Bird Center, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological Park, Washington DC, USA.,Durham University, Durham, UK.,University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland
| | - Rui Prieto
- Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, Institute of Marine Research and Okeanos R&D Centre, University of the Azores, Horta, Portugal
| | | | - Jennie Rausch
- Environment & Climate Change Canada, Yellowknife, NT, Canada
| | | | - Sarah T Saalfeld
- U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Migratory Bird Management, Anchorage, AK, USA
| | | | - Joel A Schmutz
- U.S. Geological Survey Alaska Science Center, Anchorage, AK, USA
| | - Philipp Schwemmer
- Research and Technology Centre (FTZ), Kiel University, Büsum, Germany
| | - Dale R Seip
- British Columbia Ministry of Environment, Prince George, BC, Canada
| | | | - Mónica A Silva
- Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, Institute of Marine Research and Okeanos R&D Centre, University of the Azores, Horta, Portugal.,Biology Department, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA, USA
| | - Brian W Smith
- U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Migratory Bird Management, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Fletcher Smith
- Center for Conservation Biology, College of William & Mary, Williamsburg, VA, USA.,Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Brunswick, GA, USA
| | - Jeff P Smith
- HawkWatch International, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.,H. T. Harvey & Associates, Los Gatos, CA, USA
| | - Katherine R S Snell
- Department of Migration, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, Radolfzell, Germany.,Center for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Aleksandr Sokolov
- Arctic Research Station of Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology UB, RAS, Labytnangi, Yamal-Nenets Autonomous District, Russia
| | - Vasiliy Sokolov
- Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology, Ural Division Russian Academy of Sciences, Ekaterinburg, Russia
| | - Diana V Solovyeva
- Laboratory of Ornithology, Institute of Biological Problems of the North FEB RAS, Magadan, Russia
| | - Mathew S Sorum
- National Park Service, Yukon-Charley Rivers National Preserve, Central Alaska Inventory and Monitoring Network, Fairbanks, AK, USA
| | | | - J F Therrien
- Département de Biologie & Centre d'Études Nordiques, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada.,Hawk Mountain Sanctuary, Kempton, PA, USA
| | - Kasper Thorup
- Center for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - T Lee Tibbitts
- U.S. Geological Survey Alaska Science Center, Anchorage, AK, USA
| | - Ingrid Tulp
- Wageningen Marine Research, IJmuiden, Netherlands
| | | | - Rob S A van Bemmelen
- Wageningen Marine Research, IJmuiden, Netherlands.,Bureau Waardenburg, Culemborg, Netherlands
| | - Steven Van Wilgenburg
- Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment & Climate Change Canada, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - Andrew L Von Duyke
- North Slope Borough, Department of Wildlife Management, Utqiaġvik, AK, USA
| | - Jesse L Watson
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Bryan D Watts
- Center for Conservation Biology, College of William & Mary, Williamsburg, VA, USA
| | - Judy A Williams
- Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Government of the Northwest Territories, Yellowknife, NT, Canada
| | | | - James R Wright
- School of Environment and Natural Resources, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | - David J Yurkowski
- Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.,University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | | | - Mark Hebblewhite
- Wildlife Biology Program, Department of Ecosystem and Conservation Sciences, W.A. Franke College of Forestry and Conservation, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Poessel SA, Uher-Koch BD, Pearce JM, Schmutz JA, Harrison AL, Douglas DC, von Biela VR, Katzner TE. Movements and habitat use of loons for assessment of conservation buffer zones in the Arctic Coastal Plain of northern Alaska. Glob Ecol Conserv 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e00980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
|
4
|
Noonan MJ, Fleming CH, Akre TS, Drescher-Lehman J, Gurarie E, Harrison AL, Kays R, Calabrese JM. Scale-insensitive estimation of speed and distance traveled from animal tracking data. Mov Ecol 2019; 7:35. [PMID: 31788314 PMCID: PMC6858693 DOI: 10.1186/s40462-019-0177-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2019] [Accepted: 10/01/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Speed and distance traveled provide quantifiable links between behavior and energetics, and are among the metrics most routinely estimated from animal tracking data. Researchers typically sum over the straight-line displacements (SLDs) between sampled locations to quantify distance traveled, while speed is estimated by dividing these displacements by time. Problematically, this approach is highly sensitive to the measurement scale, with biases subject to the sampling frequency, the tortuosity of the animal's movement, and the amount of measurement error. Compounding the issue of scale-sensitivity, SLD estimates do not come equipped with confidence intervals to quantify their uncertainty. METHODS To overcome the limitations of SLD estimation, we outline a continuous-time speed and distance (CTSD) estimation method. An inherent property of working in continuous-time is the ability to separate the underlying continuous-time movement process from the discrete-time sampling process, making these models less sensitive to the sampling schedule when estimating parameters. The first step of CTSD is to estimate the device's error parameters to calibrate the measurement error. Once the errors have been calibrated, model selection techniques are employed to identify the best fit continuous-time movement model for the data. A simulation-based approach is then employed to sample from the distribution of trajectories conditional on the data, from which the mean speed estimate and its confidence intervals can be extracted. RESULTS Using simulated data, we demonstrate how CTSD provides accurate, scale-insensitive estimates with reliable confidence intervals. When applied to empirical GPS data, we found that SLD estimates varied substantially with sampling frequency, whereas CTSD provided relatively consistent estimates, with often dramatic improvements over SLD. CONCLUSIONS The methods described in this study allow for the computationally efficient, scale-insensitive estimation of speed and distance traveled, without biases due to the sampling frequency, the tortuosity of the animal's movement, or the amount of measurement error. In addition to being robust to the sampling schedule, the point estimates come equipped with confidence intervals, permitting formal statistical inference. All the methods developed in this study are now freely available in the ctmmR package or the ctmmweb point-and-click web based graphical user interface.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J. Noonan
- Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological Park, 1500 Remount Rd, Front Royal, 22630 USA
- Department of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, 20742 USA
| | - Christen H. Fleming
- Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological Park, 1500 Remount Rd, Front Royal, 22630 USA
- Department of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, 20742 USA
| | - Thomas S. Akre
- Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological Park, 1500 Remount Rd, Front Royal, 22630 USA
| | - Jonathan Drescher-Lehman
- Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological Park, 1500 Remount Rd, Front Royal, 22630 USA
- Department of Biology, George Mason University, 4400 University Drive, Fairfax, 22030 USA
| | - Eliezer Gurarie
- Department of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, 20742 USA
| | - Autumn-Lynn Harrison
- Migratory Bird Center, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological Park, Washington, DC, 20008 USA
| | - Roland Kays
- North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences, Biodiversity Lab, Raleigh, 27601 USA
- Department of Forestry & Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, 4400 University Drive, Raleigh, 27695 USA
| | - Justin M. Calabrese
- Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological Park, 1500 Remount Rd, Front Royal, 22630 USA
- Department of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, 20742 USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dunn DC, Harrison AL, Curtice C, DeLand S, Donnelly B, Fujioka E, Heywood E, Kot CY, Poulin S, Whitten M, Åkesson S, Alberini A, Appeltans W, Arcos JM, Bailey H, Ballance LT, Block B, Blondin H, Boustany AM, Brenner J, Catry P, Cejudo D, Cleary J, Corkeron P, Costa DP, Coyne M, Crespo GO, Davies TE, Dias MP, Douvere F, Ferretti F, Formia A, Freestone D, Friedlaender AS, Frisch-Nwakanma H, Froján CB, Gjerde KM, Glowka L, Godley BJ, Gonzalez-Solis J, Granadeiro JP, Gunn V, Hashimoto Y, Hawkes LM, Hays GC, Hazin C, Jimenez J, Johnson DE, Luschi P, Maxwell SM, McClellan C, Modest M, Notarbartolo di Sciara G, Palacio AH, Palacios DM, Pauly A, Rayner M, Rees AF, Salazar ER, Secor D, Sequeira AMM, Spalding M, Spina F, Van Parijs S, Wallace B, Varo-Cruz N, Virtue M, Weimerskirch H, Wilson L, Woodward B, Halpin PN. The importance of migratory connectivity for global ocean policy. Proc Biol Sci 2019; 286:20191472. [PMID: 31551061 PMCID: PMC6784718 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2019.1472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The distributions of migratory species in the ocean span local, national and international jurisdictions. Across these ecologically interconnected regions, migratory marine species interact with anthropogenic stressors throughout their lives. Migratory connectivity, the geographical linking of individuals and populations throughout their migratory cycles, influences how spatial and temporal dynamics of stressors affect migratory animals and scale up to influence population abundance, distribution and species persistence. Population declines of many migratory marine species have led to calls for connectivity knowledge, especially insights from animal tracking studies, to be more systematically and synthetically incorporated into decision-making. Inclusion of migratory connectivity in the design of conservation and management measures is critical to ensure they are appropriate for the level of risk associated with various degrees of connectivity. Three mechanisms exist to incorporate migratory connectivity into international marine policy which guides conservation implementation: site-selection criteria, network design criteria and policy recommendations. Here, we review the concept of migratory connectivity and its use in international policy, and describe the Migratory Connectivity in the Ocean system, a migratory connectivity evidence-base for the ocean. We propose that without such collaboration focused on migratory connectivity, efforts to effectively conserve these critical species across jurisdictions will have limited effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel C Dunn
- Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.,Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Queensland, Level 5, Goddard Building (#8), St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia
| | - Autumn-Lynn Harrison
- Migratory Bird Center, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological Park, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Corrie Curtice
- Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Sarah DeLand
- Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Ben Donnelly
- Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Ei Fujioka
- Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Eleanor Heywood
- Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Connie Y Kot
- Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Sarah Poulin
- Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Meredith Whitten
- Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Susanne Åkesson
- Department of Biology, Center for Animal Movement Research, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Amalia Alberini
- Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Ward Appeltans
- Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (IOC) of UNESCO, IOC Project Office for IODE, Oostende, Belgium
| | | | - Helen Bailey
- Chesapeake Biological Laboratory, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Solomons, MD, USA
| | - Lisa T Ballance
- Southwest Fisheries Science Center, NOAA Fisheries, La Jolla, CA, USA.,Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, CA, USA.,Marine Mammal Institute and Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State University, Newport, OR, USA
| | - Barbara Block
- Hopkins Marine Station of Stanford University, Pacific Grove, CA, USA
| | - Hannah Blondin
- Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.,Hopkins Marine Station of Stanford University, Pacific Grove, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Paulo Catry
- MARE-Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, ISPA Instituto Universitário, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Daniel Cejudo
- Biology Department of the University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain
| | - Jesse Cleary
- Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Peter Corkeron
- Protected Species Branch, NOAA Northeast Fisheries Science Center, Woods Hole, MA, USA
| | - Daniel P Costa
- Dept of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
| | - Michael Coyne
- seaturtle.org, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Francesco Ferretti
- Hopkins Marine Station of Stanford University, Pacific Grove, CA, USA.,Department of Fish and Wildlife Conservation, College of Natural Resources and Environment, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA
| | - Angela Formia
- Wildlife Conservation Society, Bronx, NY, USA; Bata, Equatorial Guinea and Libreville, Gabon
| | | | - Ari S Friedlaender
- Dept of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
| | - Heidrun Frisch-Nwakanma
- Secretariat of the Convention on Migratory Species of Wild Animals, Bonn, Germany and Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | | | - Kristina M Gjerde
- IUCN Global Marine and Polar Programme and World Commission on Protected Areas, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Lyle Glowka
- Secretariat of the Convention on Migratory Species of Wild Animals, Bonn, Germany and Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | - Brendan J Godley
- Centre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Cornwall Campus, Penryn, UK
| | | | | | - Vikki Gunn
- GOBI Secretariat, Seascape Consultants Ltd, Romsey, UK
| | - Yuriko Hashimoto
- Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Pacific Wildlife Research Centre, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Lucy M Hawkes
- Centre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Cornwall Campus, Penryn, UK
| | - Graeme C Hays
- Centre for Integrative Ecology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | - Sara M Maxwell
- School of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences, University of Washington, Bothell Campus, Bothell, WA, USA
| | | | - Michelle Modest
- Dept of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Daniel M Palacios
- Marine Mammal Institute and Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State University, Newport, OR, USA
| | - Andrea Pauly
- Secretariat of the Convention on Migratory Species of Wild Animals, Bonn, Germany and Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | - Matt Rayner
- Auckland War Memorial Museum, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Alan F Rees
- Centre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Cornwall Campus, Penryn, UK
| | - Erick Ross Salazar
- Wildlife Conservation Society, Bronx, NY, USA; Bata, Equatorial Guinea and Libreville, Gabon
| | - David Secor
- Chesapeake Biological Laboratory, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Solomons, MD, USA
| | - Ana M M Sequeira
- UWA Oceans Institute and School of Biological Sciences, Indian Ocean Marine Research Centre, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia 6009, Australia
| | | | - Fernando Spina
- ISPRA-Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale, Ozzano dell'Emilia, Italy
| | - Sofie Van Parijs
- Protected Species Branch, NOAA Northeast Fisheries Science Center, Woods Hole, MA, USA
| | - Bryan Wallace
- Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.,Ecolibrium, Inc, Boulder, CO, USA
| | - Nuria Varo-Cruz
- Biology Department of the University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain
| | - Melanie Virtue
- Secretariat of the Convention on Migratory Species of Wild Animals, Bonn, Germany and Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | | | - Laurie Wilson
- Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Pacific Wildlife Research Centre, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Bill Woodward
- U.S. Animal Telemetry Network, NOAA/IOOS, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Patrick N Halpin
- Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hays GC, Bailey H, Bograd SJ, Bowen WD, Campagna C, Carmichael RH, Casale P, Chiaradia A, Costa DP, Cuevas E, Nico de Bruyn PJ, Dias MP, Duarte CM, Dunn DC, Dutton PH, Esteban N, Friedlaender A, Goetz KT, Godley BJ, Halpin PN, Hamann M, Hammerschlag N, Harcourt R, Harrison AL, Hazen EL, Heupel MR, Hoyt E, Humphries NE, Kot CY, Lea JSE, Marsh H, Maxwell SM, McMahon CR, Notarbartolo di Sciara G, Palacios DM, Phillips RA, Righton D, Schofield G, Seminoff JA, Simpfendorfer CA, Sims DW, Takahashi A, Tetley MJ, Thums M, Trathan PN, Villegas-Amtmann S, Wells RS, Whiting SD, Wildermann NE, Sequeira AMM. Translating Marine Animal Tracking Data into Conservation Policy and Management. Trends Ecol Evol 2019; 34:459-473. [PMID: 30879872 DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2019.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2018] [Revised: 01/21/2019] [Accepted: 01/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
There have been efforts around the globe to track individuals of many marine species and assess their movements and distribution, with the putative goal of supporting their conservation and management. Determining whether, and how, tracking data have been successfully applied to address real-world conservation issues is, however, difficult. Here, we compile a broad range of case studies from diverse marine taxa to show how tracking data have helped inform conservation policy and management, including reductions in fisheries bycatch and vessel strikes, and the design and administration of marine protected areas and important habitats. Using these examples, we highlight pathways through which the past and future investment in collecting animal tracking data might be better used to achieve tangible conservation benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Helen Bailey
- Chesapeake Biological Laboratory, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Solomons, MD 20688, USA
| | - Steven J Bograd
- NOAA Southwest Fisheries Science Center, Environmental Research Division, Monterey, CA 93940, USA
| | - W Don Bowen
- Population Ecology Division, Bedford Institute of Oceanography, Dartmouth, NS B2Y 4A2, Canada
| | - Claudio Campagna
- Wildlife Conservation Society, Marine Program, Buenos Aires, 1414 Argentina
| | - Ruth H Carmichael
- University Programs, Dauphin Island Sea Lab, Dauphin Island, AL 36528, USA; Department of Marine Sciences, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688, USA
| | - Paolo Casale
- Department of Biology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Andre Chiaradia
- Conservation Department, Phillip Island, Nature Parks, Victoria, Australia
| | - Daniel P Costa
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95060, USA
| | - Eduardo Cuevas
- CONACYT - Research Center of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Universidad Autonoma del Carmen, Campeche 24180, Mexico; Pronatura Peninsula de Yucatan, Yucatan 97205, Mexico
| | - P J Nico de Bruyn
- Mammal Research Institute, Department of Zoology & Entomology, University of Pretoria, Hatfield 0028, South Africa
| | - Maria P Dias
- BirdLife International, Cambridge CB2 3QZ, UK; MARE - Marine and Environmental Sciences Center, ISPA - Instituto Universitário, 1149-041 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Carlos M Duarte
- King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Red Sea Research Center (RSRC), Thuwal, 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia
| | - Daniel C Dunn
- Marine Geospatial Ecology Lab, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Peter H Dutton
- Marine Mammal and Turtle Division, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
| | - Nicole Esteban
- Department of Biosciences, Swansea University, Swansea SA2 8PP, Wales, UK
| | - Ari Friedlaender
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95060, USA; Institute for Marine Sciences, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 965060, USA
| | - Kimberly T Goetz
- National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research Ltd (NIWA),Greta Point, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Brendan J Godley
- Marine Turtle Research Group, Centre for Ecology and Conservation, School of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Cornwall Campus, Penryn TR10 9EZ, UK
| | - Patrick N Halpin
- Marine Geospatial Ecology Lab, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Mark Hamann
- College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia
| | - Neil Hammerschlag
- Rosenstiel School of Marine & Atmospheric Science, Abess Center for Ecosystem Science & Policy, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33149, USA
| | - Robert Harcourt
- Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
| | - Autumn-Lynn Harrison
- Migratory Bird Center, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, Washington, DC 20008, USA
| | - Elliott L Hazen
- NOAA Southwest Fisheries Science Center, Environmental Research Division, Monterey, CA 93940, USA
| | - Michelle R Heupel
- Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville, QLD 4810, Australia
| | - Erich Hoyt
- Whale and Dolphin Conservation, Bridport, Dorset, UK; IUCN Joint SSC/WCPA Marine Mammal Protected Areas Task Force, Gland, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas E Humphries
- Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, The Laboratory, Plymouth PL1 2PB, UK
| | - Connie Y Kot
- Marine Geospatial Ecology Lab, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - James S E Lea
- Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Helene Marsh
- College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia
| | - Sara M Maxwell
- School of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences, University of Washington, Bothell Campus, Bothell, WA 98011, USA
| | - Clive R McMahon
- Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia; Ecology and Biodiversity Centre, Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7004, Australia; Sydney Institute of Marine Science, Mosman, NSW 2088, Australia
| | - Giuseppe Notarbartolo di Sciara
- Tethys Research Institute, 20121 Milano, Italy; IUCN Joint SSC/WCPA Marine Mammal Protected Areas Task Force, Gland, Switzerland
| | - Daniel M Palacios
- Marine Mammal Institute and Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State University, Newport, OR 97365, USA
| | - Richard A Phillips
- British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, Cambridge, CB3 0ET, UK
| | - David Righton
- Cefas Laboratory, Suffolk, NR33 0HT, UK; School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK
| | - Gail Schofield
- School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, E14NS, London, UK
| | - Jeffrey A Seminoff
- Marine Turtle Ecology and Assessment Program, NOAA-Southwest Fisheries Science Center, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
| | - Colin A Simpfendorfer
- College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia
| | - David W Sims
- Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, The Laboratory, Plymouth PL1 2PB, UK; Ocean and Earth Science, National Oceanography Centre Southampton, University of Southampton, Waterfront Campus, Southampton, SO14 3ZH, UK; Centre for Biological Sciences, Building 85, University of Southampton, Highfield Campus, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK
| | - Akinori Takahashi
- National Institute of Polar Research, Tachikawa, Tokyo 190-8518, Japan
| | - Michael J Tetley
- IUCN Joint SSC/WCPA Marine Mammal Protected Areas Task Force, Gland, Switzerland
| | - Michele Thums
- Australian Institute of Marine Science, Indian Ocean Marine Research Centre (M096), University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
| | - Philip N Trathan
- IUCN Joint SSC/WCPA Marine Mammal Protected Areas Task Force, Gland, Switzerland
| | - Stella Villegas-Amtmann
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95060, USA
| | - Randall S Wells
- Chicago Zoological Society's Sarasota Dolphin Research Program, c/o Mote Marine Laboratory, Sarasota, FL 34236, USA
| | - Scott D Whiting
- Marine Science Program, Department of Biodiversity, Conservation, and Attractions, Kensington, WA 6151, Australia
| | - Natalie E Wildermann
- Marine Turtle Research, Ecology and Conservation Group, Department of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric, Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-4320, USA
| | - Ana M M Sequeira
- IOMRC and The University of Western Australia Oceans Institute, School of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Choudhari R, Harrison AL, Carrillo CN, Gadad SS. Abstract P2-03-12: Role of nucleus-specific intergenic long noncoding RNA-1476 in estrogen-dependent transcription in cancer. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-p2-03-12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are emerging as key regulators of diverse cellular processes, but their roles in cancer biology are just beginning to be elucidated. Previous work using Global Run-On sequencing (GRO-seq) to study the transcriptome of MCF-7 breast cancer cells identified a large number of unannotated noncoding RNAs. Integration of RNA-seq data from subcellular fractionated RNA (i.e., cytoplasm, nucleoplasm, and chromatin-associated) with GRO-seq data using a novel bioinformatics pipeline has yielded a comprehensive catalog of >1900 polyadenylated lncRNAs in MCF-7 cells, about half of which have not been annotated previously and about a quarter of which are estrogen-regulated. Analysis of RNA-seq data from hundreds of samples representing 13 different cancer and normal tissue types, revealed that many lncRNAs are differentially expressed in various cancers. Furthermore, a large number of lncRNAs show distinct expression patterns across molecular subtypes of cancer. In functional assays, Kaplan Meier analysis of selected lncRNA, such as lncRNA 1476, predicts clinical outcome in ER-positive cancer and is transcriptionally upregulated in MCF-7 cells upon estrogen treatment. LncRNA1476 has now been fully annotated (transcription start and stop site, 5' cap, polyA tail, and exon/intron structure), and cloned. Molecular analyses indicate that lncRNA1476 plays a critical role in ER-dependent pathway. Collectively, our results suggest that lncRNAs are essential in controlling biological processes.
Supported by a grant from the Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas to S.S.G
Citation Format: Choudhari R, Harrison AL, Carrillo CN, Gadad SS. Role of nucleus-specific intergenic long noncoding RNA-1476 in estrogen-dependent transcription in cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-03-12.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Choudhari
- Texas Tech University of Health Sciences Center, El Paso, TX
| | - AL Harrison
- Texas Tech University of Health Sciences Center, El Paso, TX
| | - CN Carrillo
- Texas Tech University of Health Sciences Center, El Paso, TX
| | - SS Gadad
- Texas Tech University of Health Sciences Center, El Paso, TX
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Poli CL, Harrison AL, Vallarino A, Gerard PD, Jodice PGR. Dynamic oceanography determines fine scale foraging behavior of Masked Boobies in the Gulf of Mexico. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0178318. [PMID: 28575078 PMCID: PMC5456039 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2016] [Accepted: 05/11/2017] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
During breeding, foraging marine birds are under biological, geographic, and temporal constraints. These contraints require foraging birds to efficiently process environmental cues derived from physical habitat features that occur at nested spatial scales. Mesoscale oceanography in particular may change rapidly within and between breeding seasons, and findings from well-studied systems that relate oceanography to seabird foraging may transfer poorly to regions with substantially different oceanographic conditions. Our objective was to examine foraging behavior of a pan-tropical seabird, the Masked Booby (Sula dactylatra), in the understudied Caribbean province, a moderately productive region driven by highly dynamic currents and fronts. We tracked 135 individuals with GPS units during May 2013, November 2013, and December 2014 at a regionally important breeding colony in the southern Gulf of Mexico. We measured foraging behavior using characteristics of foraging trips and used area restricted search as a proxy for foraging events. Among individual attributes, nest stage contributed to differences in foraging behavior whereas sex did not. Birds searched for prey at nested hierarchical scales ranging from 200 m-35 km. Large-scale coastal and shelf-slope fronts shifted position between sampling periods and overlapped geographically with overall foraging locations. At small scales (at the prey patch level), the specific relationship between environmental variables and foraging behavior was highly variable among individuals but general patterns emerged. Sea surface height anomaly and velocity of water were the strongest predictors of area restricted search behavior in random forest models, a finding that is consistent with the characterization of the Gulf of Mexico as an energetic system strongly influenced by currents and eddies. Our data may be combined with tracking efforts in the Caribbean province and across tropical regions to advance understanding of seabird sensing of the environment and serve as a baseline for anthropogenic based threats such as development, pollution, and commercial fisheries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline L. Poli
- Department of Forestry and Environmental Conservation, and South Carolina Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Autumn-Lynn Harrison
- Institute for Parks, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, United States of America
| | - Adriana Vallarino
- Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados Unidad Mérida, Mérida, México
| | - Patrick D. Gerard
- Department of Mathematical Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, United States of America
| | - Patrick G. R. Jodice
- U.S. Geological Survey, South Carolina Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Raabe D, Alemzadeh K, Harrison AL, Ireland AJ. The chewing robot: a new biologically-inspired way to evaluate dental restorative materials. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2010; 2009:6050-3. [PMID: 19963664 DOI: 10.1109/iembs.2009.5332590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
This paper presents a novel in vitro dental wear simulator based on 6-6 parallel kinematics to replicate mechanical wear formation on dental materials and components, such as individual teeth, crowns or bridges. The human mandible, guided by a range of passive structures moves with up to six degrees of freedom (DOF). Currently available wear simulators lack the ability to perform these complex chewing movements. In addition simulators are unable to replicate the normal range of chewing forces as they have no control system able to mimic the natural muscle function controlled by the human central nervous system. Such discrepancies between true in vivo and simulated in vitro movements will influence the outcome and reliability of wear studies using such approaches. This paper summarizes the development of a new dynamic jaw simulator based on the kinematics of the human jaw.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Raabe
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Bristol, University Walk, BS8 1TR, Bristol, UK.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
As the flagship journal of the field, Conservation Biology represents a multidisciplinary, global constituency of conservation professionals--a constituency composed of more than 5200 authors representing 1500 organizations and 89 countries. Using bibliometric records of research published in Conservation Biology, I evaluated trends in authorship of research papers from 1987 to 2005. Authorship diversified and became increasingly collaborative over time. North Americans now compose one-half of primary authorship, down from 75% in the 1990s, and European primary authors contribute a quarter of the journal's contributed research. Forty-five countries were represented in volume 19 of the journal. The top three most-cited authors are Australian. The percentage of single-authored papers declined from 57% in 1987 to 18% in 2005. Collectively, academic institutions contribute the most research to Conservation Biology, although a government agency, the U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, was the single most-productive organization. The maturing of conservation biology as a discipline, the complex geographic and multidisciplinary nature of conservation questions, and the increased ease of communication in a technologically connected world contribute to the increasingly diverse and collaborative Conservation Biology authorship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Autumn-Lynn Harrison
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Long Marine Laboratory, University of California, Santa Cruz, 100 Shaffer Road, Santa Cruz, CA 95060, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
|
12
|
Bacher B, Rice R, Clasey J, McCrory J, Harrison AL. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LIFETIME PHYSICAL ACTIVITY AND BONE MINERAL DENSITY OF THE PROXIMAL FEMUR. J Geriatr Phys Ther 2002. [DOI: 10.1519/00139143-200225030-00039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
13
|
English ML, Harrison AL, Stiles NJ, Feltner KD, McIntosh MS, Miller BR. A SCREENING TOOL FOR IDENTIFICATION OF SIGNS OF FUNCTIONAL DECLINE IN OLDER ADULTS. J Geriatr Phys Ther 2001. [DOI: 10.1519/00139143-200124030-00027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
14
|
English T, Harrison AL, Hart AL. A distance learning model in a physical therapy curriculum. J Allied Health 1999; 27:228-32. [PMID: 9879030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
In response to the rural health initiative established in 1991, the University of Kentucky has developed an innovative distance learning program of physical therapy instruction that combines classroom lecture and discussion via compressed video technology with laboratory experiences. The authors describe the process of planning, implementing, and evaluating a specific distance learning course in pathomechanics for the professional-level master's-degree physical therapy students at the University of Kentucky. This presentation may serve as a model for teaching distance learning. Descriptions of optimal approaches to preclass preparation, scheduling, course delivery, use of audiovisual aids, use of handout material, and video production are given. Special activities that may enhance or deter the achievement of the learning objectives are outlined, and a problem-solving approach to common problems encountered is presented. An approach to evaluating and comparing course outcomes for the distance learnere is presented. For this particular course, there was no statistically significant difference in the outcome measures utilized to compare the distance learners with the on-site learners.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T English
- University of Kentucky, Division of Physical Therapy, Lexington 40536-0003, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to compile information about and define variables that are influential in the career satisfaction of tenure-track, full-time, physical therapy faculty who have been employed in academia for 5 years or less but who do not yet have tenure. SUBJECTS AND METHODS An investigator-developed instrument was used to collect the data. The self-report instrument contained 80 items in four categories: demographics, social supports, teaching, and scholarly activity. Questionnaires were sent to junior physical therapy faculty at the 127 physical therapist schools in the United States and Puerto Rico listed by the American Physical Therapy Association in 1993. There were 163 responses to the survey, representing an estimated 85% of the population of junior faculty as defined by this survey. RESULTS Eighty-three percent of junior faculty surveyed were satisfied with having taken an academic position, despite feelings of loneliness, tenure anxiety, heavy work loads, and the desire for more guidance from colleagues. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION Social and collegial supports such as relationship with senior faculty and experienced colleagues are key elements influencing faculty satisfaction. Information is given that could be utilized by directors and faculty who are planning to guide the professional development of new faculty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A L Harrison
- Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Allied Health Professions, University of Kentucky, Lexington 40536-0079, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
A reliable method that is practical for clinical use for measuring head posture in standing has not been demonstrated in the literature. The purposes of this study were: 1) to produce a reliable method for measuring sagittal plane head and shoulder posture that is practical for clinical use and 2) to perform a pilot study to compare means between a nonpatient sample and a sample of people who have a history of recurring cervical pain. A method of measuring sagittal plane postural alignment of the head and shoulder in relationship to the lateral malleolus was developed using a carpenter's tri-square with a line level attached to the horizontal arm and a goniometer with a line level attached to the horizontal arm. Horizontal measures were taken with the tri-square from a vertical reference point to the tragus of the ear, to the shoulder axis, and to the lateral malleolus. Angular measures were taken with the goniometer of C7-tragus with the horizontal and tragus-corner of the eye with the horizontal. A reliability study was performed by two therapists with 15 non-patient subjects. Intraclass correlation coefficients measuring interrater reliability for horizontal and angular measures were as follows: 1) tragus to lateral malleolus: R = .87; 2) shoulder to lateral malleolus: R = .91;3) tragus to shoulder: R = .7;4) angle tragus-eye-horizon: R = .68; and 5) angle C7-tragus-horizon: R = .34. In the pilot study, 41 nonpatient subjects (11 males and 30 females, 20-45 years) and 10 patient subjects with cervical pain (one male and nine females, 23-43 years) were measured. Means calculated for horizontal distances (in cm) were: 1) tragus to lateral malleolus (nonpatients: 8.14; patients: 6.65);2) shoulder to lateral malleolus (nonpatients: 5.47; patients: 5.98); and 3) tragus to shoulder (nonpatients: 2.78; patients: .56). Means calculated for angular measures were: 1) tragus-eye-horizon (nonpatients: 18.78 degrees; patients: 21.57 degrees) and 2) C7-tragus-horizon (nonpatients: 49.34 degrees; patients: 49.43 degrees). No statistically significant differences were found between the two samples in this pilot study using an independent two-sample t test. This study demonstrates a reliable and practical method for taking postural measurements in the clinic and describes a pilot study for comparing a patient and a nonpatient sample.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A L Harrison
- Division of Physical Therapy, College of Allied Health Professions, University of Kentucky, Albert Chandler Medical Center, Lexington 40536-0079, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
Peanuts grown under dryland conditions where drought stress occurred accumulated more aflatoxin before digging than peanuts grown under irrigation. Kernels became more susceptible to Aspergillus flavus and A. parasiticus invasion when the soil moisture in the pod zone approached levels at which moisture moved from the pod into the soil and the kernel moisture dropped below 31%. Isolation frequencies of these aspergilli from fresh-dug kernels were lowest in 1968 (maximum of 3%). In 1967 and 1969, maximum percentages of 100 and 74, respectively, were noted. Kernel infestation was correlated with degree of aflatoxin contamination. Dryland fresh-dug kernels contained a maximum of 35,800 parts per billion aflatoxin while a maximum of 50 parts per billion was detected in kernels from irrigated plots. In 1969 A. flavus infestation was as high as 59% in peanuts from irrigated plots; however, no aflatoxin was detected. Absence of aflatoxin in these samples is attributed to the higher kernel moisture content which reduced the aflatoxin-producing potential of A. flavus. Statistical analysis of the data revealed no significant differences in degree of fungal infestation, production levels, and grade factors between any fungicide treatments.
Collapse
|