Frequency of cancer events with saxagliptin in the SAVOR-TIMI 53 trial

The Saxagliptin Assessment of Vascular Outcomes Recorded in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus (SAVOR)-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 53 trial randomized trial of 16,492 patients (placebo, n = 8212; saxagliptin, n = 8280) treated and followed for a median of 2.1 years afforded an opportunity to explore whether there was any association with cancer reported as a serious adverse event. At least one cancer event was reported by 688 patients (4.1%): 362 (4.3%) and 326 (3.8%) in the placebo and saxagliptin arms, respectively (p = 0.13). There were 59 (0.6%) deaths adjudicated as malignancy deaths with placebo and 53 (0.6%) with saxagliptin. Stratification by gender, age, race and ethnicity, diabetes duration, baseline glycated haemoglobin and pharmacotherapy did not show any clinically meaningful differences between the two study arms. The overall number of cancer events and malignancy-associated mortality rates were generally balanced between the placebo and saxagliptin groups, suggesting a null relationship with saxagliptin use over the median follow-up of 2.1 years. Multivariable modelling showed that male gender, dyslipidaemia and current smoking were independent predictors of cancer. These randomized data with adequate numbers of cancer cases are reassuring but limited, by the short follow-up in a trial not designed to test this hypothesis.

Impact of treatment with saxagliptin on glycaemic stability and β-cell function in the SAVOR-TIMI 53 study

AIMS

To study the effects of saxagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, on glycaemic stability and β-cell function in the SAVOR-TIMI 53 trial.

METHODS

We randomized 16,492 patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) to saxagliptin or placebo, added to current antidiabetic medications, and followed them for a median of 2.1 years. Glycaemic instability was defined by: (i) a glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) increase of ≥ 0.5% post-randomization; (ii) the initiation of new antidiabetic medications for ≥ 3 months; or (iii) an increase in dose of oral antidiabetic medication or ≥ 25% increase in insulin dose for ≥ 3 months. β-cell function was assessed according to fasting homeostatic model 2 assessment of β-cell function (HOMA-2β) values at baseline and at year 2 in patients not treated with insulin.

RESULTS

Compared with placebo, participants treated with saxagliptin had a reduction in the development of glycaemic instability (hazard ratio 0.71; 95% confidence interval 0.68-0.74; p < 0.0001). In participants treated with saxagliptin compared with placebo, the occurrence of an HbA1c increase of ≥ 0.5% was reduced by 35.2%; initiation of insulin was decreased by 31.7% and the increases in doses of an oral antidiabetic drug or insulin were reduced by 19.5 and 23.5%, respectively (all p < 0.0001). At 2 years, HOMA-2β values decreased by 4.9% in participants treated with placebo, compared with an increase of 1.1% in those treated with saxagliptin (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Saxagliptin improved glycaemia and prevented the reduction in HOMA-2β values. Saxagliptin may reduce the usual decline in β-cell function in T2D, thereby slowing diabetes progression.

Baseline characteristics of the patient population in the Saxagliptin Assessment of Vascular Outcomes Recorded in patients with diabetes mellitus (SAVOR)-TIMI 53 trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

SAVOR-TIMI 53 was designed to study the effects of the DPP-4 inhibitor saxagliptin on cardiovascular outcomes in high risk type 2 diabetes patients with diverse levels of diabetes control and background anti-diabetic drugs. The goal of this article is to describe the baseline characteristics of this hypothesis driven study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 16 496 diabetic patients from North America (31.9%), Western Europe (26.0%), Eastern Europe (17.3%), Latin America (16.4%) and Asia (8.3%), with either established cardiovascular disease (78.3%) or with ≥two additional cardiovascular risk factors (21.7%) were randomised to saxagliptin or placebo. Biomarkers of inflammation and insulin resistance were taken at baseline and 2 years later in order to correlate saxagliptin effect on cardiovascular outcome to its effect on inflammation and insulin resistance.

RESULTS

Mean [+/-standard deviation (SD)] age was 65.0 (+/-8.6) years, 66.9% were male, body mass index was 31.2 kg/m² (+/-5.6), mean diabetes duration was 11.9 years (+/-8.9) and the mean HbA1c 8.0% (+/-1.4%). HbA1c  < 7% was most prevalent among North Americans (30.8%) and least among Asians (15.1%), whereas HbA1c  > 9% was 30.7% in Latin America 27.0% in Asia and 15.1% in North America. Diabetic retinopathy was reported in 12.3% of patients, nephropathy in 17.7% and amputation in 2.5%. Diabetic treatments categories were as follows: no medication (5.4%), 1 oral anti-diabetic drug (OAD) (25.0%), ≥2 OAD (27.7%) and/or insulin (40.9%). The prevalence of micro-albuminuria was twice as high among insulin users compared with users of ≥2 OAD. Baseline statin use (78.3% overall) varied by region.

CONCLUSION

The SAVOR-TIMI 53 patient population, with differing background diabetes control and anti-diabetic treatment, provides global representation of diabetic patients with established cardiovascular disease or at high risk for cardiovascular disease and is well-positioned to determine the effect of saxagliptin on cardiovascular events.

Emergency department thrombolysis critical pathway reduces door-to-drug times in acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Rapid time to treatment with thrombolytic therapy is an important determinant of survival in acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

HYPOTHESIS

We hypothesized that establishment of an AMI thrombolysis critical pathway in the Emergency Department could successfully reduce the "door-to-drug" time, the time between patient arrival and start of thrombolysis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Before establishment of the AMI critical pathway, median door-to-drug time was 73 min, which was reduced to 37 min after critical pathway implementation (p < 0.05). The percentage of patients treated within 30 min rose from 0% prior to establishment of the pathway to 43% (p = 0.03). Similarly, the percentage treated in within 45 min rose from 0 to 67% (p = 0.0005). Door-to-drug times were longer for women than for men (median 105 min for women vs. 70 min for men before pathway implementation). The pathway reduced door-to-drug time for both genders, but the median door-to-drug times were higher for women than for men (Mann-Whitney p = 0.013). The difference between men and women was 35 min before establishment of the pathway to 10 min by the end of the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

Our critical pathway was successful in reducing door-to-drug times. We observed a "gender gap" in door-to-drug times, with longer mean times for women, which was reduced by the AMI critical pathway. Thus, our data provide support for the use of critical pathways to reduce door-to-drug times, as recommended by the National Heart Attack Alert Program.

Racial differences in the management of unstable angina: results from the multicenter GUARANTEE registry

BACKGROUND

Prior studies, usually conducted with the use of insurance databases, have shown differences in the use of cardiac procedures between black patients and white patients hospitalized with various types of coronary artery disease. However, few data are available in prospectively collected cohorts of patients with unstable angina or on the use of appropriate medications or interventions.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We evaluated 2948 consecutive patients with unstable angina admitted to 35 hospitals across the United States in 1996, comparing nonwhite and white patients. Seventy-seven percent of patients were white, 14% were black, 4% were Hispanic, 1% were Asian, and 3% were other or unknown race. Differences were seen in coronary risk profile, with a higher incidence of hypertension and diabetes mellitus in nonwhites. Cardiac catheterization was performed less often in nonwhites compared with whites (36% vs 53%, P =.001). Even in patients meeting the criteria for appropriate catheterization in the Agency for Health Care Policy Research unstable angina guidelines, fewer nonwhites underwent catheterization (44% vs 61%, P =.001), but among these, fewer nonwhites had significant coronary stenosis (72% vs 90%, P =.001). However, among patients catheterized who had indications for revascularization, angioplasty and coronary artery bypass grafting were performed equally often in nonwhites and whites.

CONCLUSIONS

Current guidelines would recommend more aggressive use of cardiac catheterization for nonwhite patients. However, our findings suggest that racial differences may need to be included in the diagnostic and interventional algorithms.

Differences between men and women in the management of unstable angina pectoris (The GUARANTEE Registry). The GUARANTEE Investigators

Few data are available in prospectively collected cohorts of patients with unstable angina pectoris or on the use of appropriate medications or interventions. Accordingly, we evaluated 2,948 consecutive patients with unstable angina admitted to 35 hospitals in the United States in 1996, and comparing men and women (39% of the patients were women). Differences were seen in coronary risk profiles with a higher incidence of systemic hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and a family history of coronary disease in women. Women were less likely to receive Agency for Health Care Policy Research (AHCPR) recommended pharmacologic treatment than men. Cardiac catheterization, coronary angioplasty, and bypass was performed less often in women compared with men (44% vs. 53%, p = 0.002; 12% vs. 18%, p = 0.02; 7% vs. 10%, p = 0.001, respectively). At catheterization, women were more likely to have no significant coronary artery disease (25% vs. 14%, p = 0.001). Although fewer women than men fulfilled the AHCPR criteria for cardiac catheterization (54% vs. 64%, p = 0.001), a similar rate of men and women with positive criteria underwent catheterization and angioplasty. However, fewer women with positive criteria underwent bypass surgery (36% vs. 46%, p = 0.03). More men "ruled-in" for a myocardial infarction at admission (13% vs. 8%, p = 0.001), but there was no difference in recurrent angina, in-hospital myocardial infarction, or death. Despite different epidemiologic profiles and less evidence of coronary artery disease by noninvasive and invasive tests, women and men had similar outcomes.

Serum neopterin levels and the angiographic extent of coronary arterial narrowing in unstable angina pectoris and in non-Q-wave acute myocardial infarction

Systemic serum markers of inflammation are elevated in diseases due to atherosclerosis, but have not been associated with the extent of atherosclerotic disease. We examined the role of neopterin, a byproduct of activated macrophage metabolism, in patients with unstable angina. Baseline neopterin samples and clinical histories were obtained in 52 patients admitted with unstable angina pectoris. Coronary angiograms of 27 patients were reviewed using Sullivan's method to assess the total atherosclerotic burden in the coronary arteries. Twenty-six of the 52 patients were eventually diagnosed with a non-Q-wave acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and had higher neopterin levels (10.1 +/- 6.7 vs 7.2 +/- 4.0 nmol/L, p = 0.06) than patients with a final diagnosis of unstable angina. Patients with neopterin >8.7 were more likely to be diagnosed with a non-Q-wave AMI (75% vs 39%, p = 0.035) and were more likely to have significantly more severe and extensive angiographically determined atherosclerosis than patients with low neopterin levels. Neopterin levels correlated with the score of atherosclerotic extension (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient 0.4807, p = 0.034). This study demonstrates a correlation between immune cell activation and the extent of angiographically determined atherosclerosis and the degree of myocardial ischemia.

Delay in thrombolysis administration: causes of extended door-to-drug times and the asymptote effect

We retrospectively analyzed medical records and critical pathway data forms of all patients who received thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) over a 2 1/2-year period. The time spent by each patient in the emergency department (ED) prior to receiving thrombolytic therapy (the door-to-drug time) was determined. Records of those patients with door-to-drug times exceeding the median were closely examined to determine the cause of treatment delays. Results indicated that treatment delays resulted from delays in obtaining the initial electrocardiogram (24%), atypical presentations (11%), the need to rule out a potential contraindication (11%), the need to confirm the diagnosis (14%), and miscellaneous causes (8%). Many patients had no identifiable reason for their delay (32%). A certain population of AMI patients either do not satisfy thrombolytic criteria upon initial ED presentation or require prolonged evaluation to investigate possible contraindications to thrombolysis such as aortic dissection. The inclusion of patients in this separate population in a general analysis of median door-to-drug times results in an artificial asymptote effect and may confound quality initiatives.