Lowering sample size in comparative analyses can indicate a correlation where there is none: example from Rensch's rule in primates

The fact that characters may co-vary in organism groups because of shared ancestry and not always because of functional correlations was the initial rationale for developing phylogenetic comparative methods. Here we point out a case where similarity due to shared ancestry can produce an undesired effect when conducting an independent contrasts analysis. Under special circumstances, using a low sample size will produce results indicating an evolutionary correlation between characters where an analysis of the same pattern utilizing a larger sample size will show that this correlation does not exist. This is the opposite effect of increased sample size to that expected; normally an increased sample size increases the chance of finding a correlation. The situation where the problem occurs is when co-variation between the two continuous characters analysed is clumped in clades; e.g. when some phylogenetically conservative factors affect both characters simultaneously. In such a case, the correlation between the two characters becomes contingent on the number of clades sharing this conservative factor that are included in the analysis, in relation to the number of species contained within these clades. Removing species scattered evenly over the phylogeny will in this case remove the exact variation that diffuses the evolutionary correlation between the two characters - the variation contained within the clades sharing the conservative factor. We exemplify this problem by discussing a parallel in nature where the described problem may be of importance. This concerns the question of the presence or absence of Rensch's rule in primates.

The influence of territoriality and mating system on the evolution of male care: a phylogenetic study on fish

Evolution of male care is still poorly understood. Using phylogenetically matched-pairs comparisons we tested for effects of territoriality and mating system on male care evolution in fish. All origins of male care were found in pair-spawning species (with or without additional males such as sneakers) and none were found in group-spawning species. However, excluding group spawners, male care originated equally often in pair-spawning species with additional males as in strict pair-spawning species. Evolution of male care was also significantly related to territoriality. Yet, most pair-spawning taxa with male care are also territorial, making their relative influence difficult to separate. Furthermore, territoriality also occurs in group-spawning species. Hence, territoriality is not sufficient for male care to evolve. Rather, we argue that it is the combination of territoriality and pair spawning with sequential polygyny that favours the evolution of male care, and we discuss our results in relation to paternity assurance and sexual selection.

Fruit or aposematic insect? Context-dependent colour preferences in domestic chicks

Colours are common stimuli in signalling systems. Requirements to function well as a signal sometimes conflict between different signallers, and the same colour stimulus is used to convey completely different messages to the same receiver. Fruits and aposematic insects both use red coloration as a signal, in the former case to signal profitability and in the latter case as a warning signal. In two experiments, we investigated whether the domestic chick, an omnivorous predator, differed in its unconditioned preference or avoidance of red and green stimuli depending on whether or not the stimulus was an insect. The experiments were designed as preference tests between red and green painted prey. The prey were live insects and artificial fruits (experiment 1), and, to investigate the effect of movement, live and dead insects (experiment 2). The chicks did not show any difference in pecking preference between red and green when fruit-like stimuli were used, but when the prey were insects, green prey were strongly preferred to red prey, and prey movement did not affect this bias. Thus, young chicks may recognize prey as insects and then discriminate between different prey colorations, or one type of food may elicit an unlearned colour preference-avoidance response that is absent with another type of food.

Phylogenetic analysis of twinning in callitrichinae

The callitrichines are known for twinning and for a communal rearing system in which all or most group members help care for the offspring. The origin of twinning has been the subject of much speculation. In this study predictions from earlier hypotheses are tested on the basis of two alternative phylogenetic trees. From this analysis we infer that helping behavior and male care preceded the origin of twinning, and that these traits did not coevolve with, but might have been important prerequisites for twinning in callitrichines. Small body size does not necessarily result in twinning, although it might still have been a prerequisite for its evolution. Gum feeding was an ecological change which evolved along with twinning. If nutrition was a limiting factor in the number of off-spring produced, then the use of a new feeding resource could have been crucial for the origin of twinning in callitrichines. According to one of the two alternative solutions inferred by the total evidence tree, and in accordance with the morphological tree, semi-annual breeding appears in the marmosets together with specialization in gum feeding. The fact that gums are available for these monkeys all year may have facilitated semiannual breeding. We suggest that the exploitation of gums as a feeding resource could have been the decisive factor in the increase of the reproductive rate by twinning and by semi-annual breeding.

Did aggregation favour the initial evolution of warning coloration? A novel world revisited

From experiments using novel prey signals to avoid innate reactions to traditional signals, Alatalo & Mappes (1996, Nature, 382, 708-710) concluded that gregariousness would have selected for warning coloration as it originated for the first time, whereas a solitary prey distribution would not. We have investigated this suggestion in experiments using the same novel prey and background symbols and wild-caught great tit, Parus major, predators. We compared the attack rate on cryptic unpalatable and aposematic unpalatable prey in either a solitary or an aggregated treatment. In the aggregated treatment we found no difference in attack rate on cryptic and aposematic prey. In the solitary treatment the attack rate on aposematic prey was significantly lower after one attack and at the end of the experiment. Thus, we conclude that, in so far as these experiments mimic an original predator-prey relationship, they do not give support to the idea that aggregation would have favoured the evolution of warning coloration in unpalatable prey. Copyright 2000 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Evidence for a peak-shift in predator generalization among aposematic prey

A previous theoretical model involving learning psychology and game theory has suggested how warning coloration in unprofitable prey could evolve and become stable. The model shows that in a dimension of increasing prey conspicuousness a displacement of the minimum in a predators' generalization gradient (peak-shift), can produce a strong enough selection pressure towards a more conspicuous coloration that would balance the increased risk of discovery and thus stabilize an aposematic strategy. Using naive domestic chicks (Gallus gallus domesticus) as predators on three different instars of larvae of the aposematic bug Tropidothorax leucopterus (Heteroptera:Lygaeidae), we first show that their unconditioned aversion increases towards larger prey. This aversion is caused by increased aposematism-conspicuousness with increasing size, as no aversion at all was found in a control experiment increasing the size of edible prey. We then show that after one experience of aposematic prey, the chicks exhibit a greater aversion towards prey that are larger and thus more aposematic than those they had experienced. Our results thus provide evidence of a peak-shift in a predators' generalization gradient in a stimulus dimension of increasing prey conspicuousness. The mechanisms behind this peak-shift are investigated and discussed.