Real-World Adherence to and Persistence with Vibegron in Patients with Overactive Bladder: A Retrospective Claims Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Vibegron is a β3-adrenergic receptor agonist approved for overactive bladder (OAB). This analysis assessed real-world adherence and persistence with vibegron in patients with OAB, along with demographics and clinical characteristics associated with adherence and persistence.

METHODS

This retrospective study used the Optum Research Database to identify patients treated with vibegron from April 2021 to August 2022 (identification period). Patients had ≥ 60 days of continuous pharmacy coverage in a commercial or Medicare Advantage plan following the index fill (follow-up). Adherence was assessed as proportion of days covered (PDC) from index to end of follow-up and was defined as PDC ≥ 80%. Persistence was measured as days to discontinuation of therapy (30-day gap) or end of follow-up. Data for adherence and persistence are presented descriptively. Characteristics associated with adherence and persistence were analyzed using multivariable models among patients with medical and pharmacy benefits during the 90 days before index (baseline).

RESULTS

Overall, 9992 patients had a vibegron claim during the identification period; 9712 had ≥ 2 months of follow-up. Mean (SD) age was 74.2 (10.7) years; 68.2% were female. Mean (SD) PDC was 0.64 (0.34). Median (95% confidence interval) persistence was 142 (132-153) days. Of the 5073 patients who were ≥ 18 years old with continuous baseline pharmacy and medical benefits ≥ 90 days before index, 2497 (49.2%) were adherent. Patients were more likely to be adherent and persistent if they received a greater days' supply for the index fill and had baseline medication count ≥ 6. Patients were more likely to discontinue if their index copay was > $45.

CONCLUSION

Nearly half of the patients initiating vibegron were adherent. Factors associated with adherence and persistence were more likely to be related to prescribing practices than patient characteristics. These results suggest it may be best to follow up with patients approximately 4 to 5 months after initiating treatment with vibegron.

Real-World Persistence of Successive Biologics in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Findings From ROTARY

BACKGROUND

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may receive multiple successive biologic treatments in clinical practice; however, data are limited on the comparative effectiveness of biologics and the impact of treatment sequence on outcomes.

METHODS

The ROTARY (Real wOrld ouTcomes Across tReatment sequences in inflammatorY bowel disease patients) study was a retrospective, observational cohort study conducted using data from the Optum Clinical Database between January 1, 2012, and February 29, 2020. Adult patients with Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) who received 2 biologics successively were included. Biologic treatment sequences were analyzed descriptively. Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for baseline demographics and clinical characteristics, were used to estimate the hazard ratio of switching or discontinuation for each first- and second-line biologic compared with first- and second-line adalimumab, respectively.

RESULTS

In total, 4648 patients with IBD (CD, n = 3008; UC, n = 1640) were identified. Most patients received tumor necrosis factor α antagonist (anti-TNFα) treatment followed by another anti-TNFα treatment or vedolizumab. Vedolizumab and infliximab had 39.4% and 34.6% lower rates of switching or discontinuation than adalimumab, respectively, as first-line biologics in patients with CD and 30.8% and 34.3% lower rates as first-line biologics in patients with UC, respectively. Vedolizumab, infliximab, and ustekinumab had 47.2%, 40.0%, and 43.5% lower rates of switching or discontinuation than adalimumab, respectively, as second-line biologics in CD and 56.5%, 43.0%, and 45.6% lower rates as second-line biologics in patients with UC, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Although anti-TNFα treatments were most commonly prescribed, the adjusted rates of discontinuation for adalimumab as both a first- and second-line biologic were higher than for vedolizumab, infliximab, or ustekinumab.

Impact of chronic fibrosing interstitial lung disease on healthcare use: association between fvc decline and inpatient hospitalization

BACKGROUND

Many types of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) may transition to progressive chronic-fibrosing ILDs with rapid lung function decline and a negative survival prognosis. In real-world clinical settings, forced vital capacity (FVC) measures demonstrating progressive decline may be linked to negative outcomes, including increased risks of costly healthcare resource utilization (HRU). Thus, we assessed the relationship between rate of decline in lung function and an increase in HRU, specifically inpatient hospitalization, among patients with chronic fibrosing ILD.

METHODS

This study utilized electronic health records from 01-Oct-2015 to 31-Oct-2019. Eligible patients (≥ 18 years old) had ≥ 2 fibrosing ILD diagnosis codes, clinical activity for ≥ 15 months, and ≥ 2 FVC tests occurring 6 months apart. Patients with missing demographic data, IPF, or use of nintedanib or pirfenidone were excluded. Two groups were defined by relative change in percent of predicted FVC (FVC% pred) from baseline to 6 months: significant decline (≥ 10%) vs. marginal decline/stable FVC (decrease < 10% or increase). The primary outcome was defined as the occurrence of an inpatient hospitalization 6 months after the first FVC value. Descriptive and multivariable analysis was conducted to examine the impact of FVC decline on occurrence of inpatient hospitalization.

RESULTS

The sample included 566 patients: 13% (n = 75) with significant decline and 87% (n = 491) with marginal decline/stable FVC; their mean age (SD) was 65 (13.7) years and 56% were female. Autoimmune diagnoses were observed among 40% of patients with significant decline, and 27% with marginal decline/stable FVC. The significant decline group had better lung function at baseline than the marginal/stable group. For patients with FVC% <80% at baseline, reduction of FVC% ≥10% was associated with significantly increased odds of an inpatient hospitalization (odds ratio [OR] 2.85; confidence interval [CI] 1.17, 6.94 [p = 0.021]).

CONCLUSION

Decline in FVC% ≥10% was associated with increased odds of inpatient hospitalization among patients with reduced lung function at baseline. These findings support the importance of preserving lung function among patients with fibrosing ILD.

Characteristics associated with receipt of treatment among patients diagnosed with chronic hepatitis C virus

Although current guidelines recommend that nearly all patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection receive treatment, a substantial proportion remain untreated. We conducted an administrative claims analysis to provide real-world data on treatment patterns and characteristics of treated versus untreated patients among individuals with HCV in the United States. Adults with an HCV diagnosis from 01 July 2016 through 30 September 2020 and continuous health plan enrolment for 12 months before and ≥1 month after the diagnosis date were identified in the Optum Research Database. Descriptive and multivariable analyses were conducted to evaluate the association between patient characteristics and the rate of treatment. Of 24,374 patients identified with HCV, only 30% initiated treatment during follow-up. Factors associated with increased rate of treatment included younger age versus age 75+ (hazard ratio [HR] 1.50-1.83 depending on age group), commercial versus Medicare insurance (HR 1.32), and diagnosis by a specialist versus a primary care physician (HR 2.56 and 2.62 for gastroenterology and infectious disease or hepatology, respectively) (p < .01 for all). Several baseline comorbidities were associated with decreased rate of treatment, including psychiatric disorders (HR 0.87), drug use disorders (HR 0.85) and cirrhosis (HR 0.42) (p < .01 for all). These findings highlight existing HCV treatment inequities, particularly among older patients and those with psychiatric disorders, substance use disorders or chronic comorbidities. Targeted efforts to increase treatment uptake in these populations could mitigate a considerable future burden of HCV-related morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs.

Healthcare Resource Utilization and Associated Costs in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Diagnosed With Lupus Nephritis

BACKGROUND

Lupus nephritis (LN) is among the most severe organ manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), affecting between 31% and 48% of patients, usually within five years of SLE diagnosis. SLE without LN is associated with a high economic burden on the healthcare system, and although data are limited, several studies have shown that SLE with LN could increase this burden.  Aim: We aimed to compare the economic burden of LN versus SLE without LN among patients managed in routine clinical practices in the USA and describe the clinical course of these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study of patients with commercial or Medicare Advantage health insurance. It included 2310 patients with LN and 2310 matched patients who had SLE without LN; each patient was followed for 12 months after diagnosis (the patient's index date). Outcome measures included healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), direct healthcare costs, and SLE clinical manifestations.  Results: In all healthcare settings, the mean (SD) use of all-cause healthcare resources was significantly higher in the LN versus SLE without LN cohort, including the mean number of ambulatory visits (53.9 (55.1) vs 33.0 (26.0)), emergency room visits (2.9 (7.9) vs 1.6 (3.3)), inpatient stays (0.9 (1.5) vs 0.3 (0.8)), and pharmacy fills (65.0 (48.3) vs 51.2 (42.6)) (all p<0.001). Total all-cause costs per patient in the LN cohort were also significantly higher compared with the SLE without LN cohort ($50,975 (86,281) vs $26,262 (52,720), p<0.001), including costs for inpatient stays and outpatient visits. Clinically, a significantly higher proportion of patients with LN experienced moderate or severe SLE flares compared with the SLE without LN cohort (p<0.001), which may explain the difference in HCRU and healthcare costs.

CONCLUSION

All-cause HCRU and costs were higher for patients with LN than for matched patients with SLE without LN, highlighting the economic burden associated with LN.

Comparison of surgery rates in biologic-naïve patients with Crohn's disease treated with vedolizumab or ustekinumab: findings from SOJOURN

BACKGROUND

Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease characterized by relapsing and remitting inflammation that leads to progressive bowel damage. Despite advances in medical treatment for CD, many patients require surgical intervention. Most studies of surgery rates are from patients treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNFα) treatments, with comparatively little data on the surgery rates of patients treated with vedolizumab and ustekinumab. SOJOURN aimed to estimate the hazard rate and incidence of the first CD-related surgery following initiation of treatment with vedolizumab or ustekinumab in biologic-naïve patients with CD.

METHODS

SOJOURN was a retrospective, observational cohort study examining administrative claims data from the Optum® Research Database between July 1, 2017 and March 31, 2020. Included participants were adults with a diagnosis of CD and a claim for vedolizumab or ustekinumab (defined as the index treatment) between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2019, with no claims for a biologic in the 6 months before initiation of this treatment. The variable follow-up started on the day after the index date and continued until whichever came first of discontinuation of the index treatment, surgery event, switching of the index treatment, initiation of combination biologic treatment, disenrollment, or March 31, 2020. The time to the first CD-related surgery on biologic treatment was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. The hazard ratio and incidence rate ratio of CD-related surgery for each treatment cohort was compared using a Cox proportional hazards model and a Poisson regression model, respectively.

RESULTS

Of the 1,122 included patients, 578 received vedolizumab and 544 received ustekinumab. After 1 year of the variable follow-up, 7.7% of patients receiving vedolizumab and 11.6% of patients receiving ustekinumab had undergone a CD-related surgery. Vedolizumab was associated with a 34.2% lower hazard rate of surgery (hazard ratio 0.658, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.436-0.994, p = 0.047) and a 34.5% lower incidence of surgery (rate ratio 0.655, 95% CI 0.434-0.988, p = 0.044) than ustekinumab.

CONCLUSIONS

This real-world analysis of biologic-naïve patients with CD suggests that vedolizumab is associated with greater effectiveness in reducing the rate of CD-related surgery than ustekinumab.

Clinical characteristics, healthcare use, and annual costs among patients with dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa

Background

Dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (DEB) is a serious, ultra-rare, genetic blistering disease that requires a multidisciplinary care team and lifelong, proactive disease management. To organize and optimize care, we comprehensively examined diagnoses, healthcare use, and annual costs in patients with DEB across all healthcare settings.

Methods

A retrospective study was performed using electronic health record (EHR) data from Optum Clinical Database (January 1, 2016, through June 30, 2020). Patients with an epidermolysis bullosa (EB) diagnosis between July 1, 2016, and December 31, 2019, with ≥ 6 months of baseline and 12 months of follow-up activity were included. Patients were stratified by EB type: recessive DEB (RDEB), dominant DEB (DDEB), DEB (type unknown), and EB unspecified. Demographics, comorbid conditions, and healthcare resource utilization were identified from EHR data. Cost of bandages and total medical costs (US$) were identified from linked claims data.

Results

A total of 412 patients were included, classified as having DDEB (n = 17), RDEB (n = 85), DEB (type unknown; n = 45), and EB unspecified (n = 265). Mean age was 38.4 years, and 41.7% had commercial insurance coverage. The most common comorbidities were mental health disorders, malnutrition, and constipation. Rates of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma ranged from 0% (DDEB) to 4.4% (RDEB). Prescriptions included antibiotics (56.6%), pain medications (48.3%), and itch medications (50.7%). On average, patients had 19.7 ambulatory visits during the 12-month follow-up, 22.8% had an emergency department visit, and 23.8% had an inpatient stay. Direct medical costs among patients with claims data (n = 92) ranged from $22,179 for EB unspecified to $48,419 for DEB (type unknown).

Conclusions

This study demonstrated the range of comorbidities, multiple healthcare visits and prescription medications, and treatment costs during 1 year of follow-up for patients with DEB. The results underscore that the clinical and economic burden of DEB is substantial and primarily driven by supportive and palliative strategies to manage sequelae of this disease, highlighting the unmet need for treatments that instead directly address the underlying pathology of this disease.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13023-022-02509-0.

Real-world characteristics, treatment experiences and corticosteroid utilisation of patients treated with tofacitinib for moderate to severe ulcerative colitis

Background

Tofacitinib is an oral, small molecule JAK inhibitor for the treatment of UC. We aimed to describe the real-world treatment experience and corticosteroid utilisation of patients treated with tofacitinib in a US claims database.

Methods

Patients with a UC diagnosis who initiated tofacitinib, vedolizumab or tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) treatment between May 2018 and July 2019 were identified from the Optum Research Database. Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients who initiated tofacitinib, vedolizumab or TNFi were described. Oral corticosteroid use prior to and following tofacitinib initiation was evaluated. Tofacitinib adherence (proportion of days covered) and continuation was assessed for 6 months following initiation. Analyses were descriptive and stratified by prior biologic use (naïve, 1 or ≥ 2; minimum of 12 months prior to tofacitinib initiation).

Results

Among patients initiating tofacitinib (N = 225), mean age was 45.6 (SD 16.5) years and 50.2% were female. Of these, 43 (19.1%) patients were biologic-naïve and 182 (80.9%) had prior biologic use (92 [40.9%], 1 prior biologic; 90 [40.0%], ≥ 2 prior biologics). Among patients with 1 prior biologic, 82.6% were previously treated with a TNFi. Among patients with ≥ 2 prior biologics, 54.4% were previously treated with vedolizumab and a TNFi, 16.7% with two TNFi and 28.9% with ≥ 3 prior biologics. In the 6 months prior to tofacitinib initiation, 65.8% of patients had received oral corticosteroids (74.4%, 60.9% and 66.7% for biologic-naïve, 1 and ≥ 2 prior biologics, respectively). The proportion of patients with ongoing oral corticosteroid use 3–6 months after tofacitinib initiation decreased to 13.3% (9.3%, 18.5% and 10.0% for biologic-naïve, 1 and ≥ 2 prior biologics, respectively), and 19.6% of patients discontinued oral corticosteroid use during the 6 months after tofacitinib initiation. Overall, tofacitinib adherence, as determined by the mean proportion of days covered during the 6-month follow-up, was 0.7 (median 0.8). During the 6-month follow-up, 84.9% of patients continued tofacitinib.

Conclusions

Among patients with UC initiating tofacitinib, the majority had prior biologic use. Tofacitinib adherence was high, discontinuation was low and oral corticosteroid utilisation decreased irrespective of prior biologic use. Further research with longer follow-up and a larger sample size is required.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12876-022-02215-y.

Racial and ethnic disparity in clinical outcomes among patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection in a large US electronic health record database

BACKGROUND

Racial and ethnic minority groups have been disproportionately affected by the US coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic; however, nationwide data on COVID-19 outcomes stratified by race/ethnicity and adjusted for clinical characteristics are sparse. This study analyzed the impacts of race/ethnicity on outcomes among US patients with COVID-19.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study of patients with a confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis in the electronic health record from 01 February 2020 through 14 September 2020. Index encounter site, hospitalization, and mortality were assessed by race/ethnicity (Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black [Black], non-Hispanic White [White], non-Hispanic Asian [Asian], or Other/unknown). Associations between racial/ethnic categories and study outcomes adjusted for patient characteristics were evaluated using logistic regression.

FINDINGS

Among 202,908 patients with confirmed COVID-19, patients from racial/ethnic minority groups were more likely than White patients to be hospitalized on initial presentation (Hispanic: adjusted odds ratio 1·690, 95% CI 1·620-1·763; Black: 1·810, 1·743-1·880; Asian: 1·503, 1·381-1·636) and during follow-up (Hispanic: 1·700, 1·638-1·764; Black: 1·578, 1·526-1·633; Asian: 1·391, 1·288-1·501). Among hospitalized patients, adjusted mortality risk was lower for Black patients (0·881, 0·809-0·959) but higher for Asian patients (1·205, 1·000-1·452).

INTERPRETATION

Racial/ethnic minority patients with COVID-19 had more severe disease on initial presentation than White patients. Increased mortality risk was attenuated by hospitalization among Black patients but not Asian patients, indicating that outcome disparities may be mediated by distinct factors for different groups. In addition to enacting policies to facilitate equitable access to COVID-19-related care, further analyses of disaggregated population-level COVID-19 data are needed.

Comparison of COPD health care utilization and associated costs across patients treated with LAMA+LABA fixed-dose therapies

BACKGROUND: There is limited clinical trial and/or real-world evidence comparing differences among currently approved fixed-dose combination (FDC) long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA)/long-acting beta2-agonist (LABA) treatments. OBJECTIVE: To compare chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)-related and all-cause health care resource utilization (HCRU) and costs between COPD patients initiating tiotropium (TIO) + olodaterol (OLO) versus (a) other LAMA + LABA FDCs and (b) umeclidinium (UMEC) + vilanterol (VI), specifically. METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, patients initiating fixed-dose LAMA + LABA therapy (earliest fill date = index date) between January 1, 2014, and September 30, 2018, were identified using administrative claims data from the Optum Research Database. Patients were followed post-index for 1-12 months. Follow-up was censored at the earliest occurrence of index therapy discontinuation or switch, health plan disenrollment, study end date, or reaching the maximum 12-month allowed duration. Propensity score matching of 1:2 was used to balance differences in baseline characteristics between cohorts for each of the 2 comparisons. Annualized population averages of HCRU and costs were calculated for each cohort as [sum of visits (or costs) for all individuals during the follow-up period] ÷ [sum of follow-up on-treatment time for all individuals] × 365 days. RESULTS: After matching, compared with patients who initiated other LAMA + LABAs or UMEC + VI, patients who initiated TIO + OLO had 14.29% and 16.95% fewer mean annualized per-patient COPD-related emergency department (ED) visits (vs. other LAMA + LABAs: 0.49 vs. 0.59, P = 0.005; vs. UMEC + VI: 0.48 vs. 0.56, P = 0.026) and 3.07% and 3.14% fewer mean annualized per-patient pharmacy fills (vs. other LAMA + LABAs: 12.66 vs. 13.07, P = 0.016; vs. UMEC + VI: 12.62 vs. 13.02, P = 0.022), leading to 17.39% and 21.47% lower mean annualized per-patient COPD-related ED costs (vs. other LAMA + LABAs: $289 vs. $368, P = 0.003; vs. UMEC + VI: $285 vs. $345, P = 0.027) and 4.56% and 5.67% lower mean annualized per-patient pharmacy spending (vs. other LAMA + LABAs: $3,570 vs. $3,741, P < 0.001; vs. UMEC + VI: $3,556 vs. $3,770, P < 0.001) in the follow-up period. Similarly, patients in the TIO + OLO cohort had 15.63% and 21.17% fewer mean annualized per-patient all-cause ED visits (vs. other LAMA + LABAs: 1.08 vs. 1.37, P < 0.001; vs. UMEC + VI: 1.08 vs. 1.28, P = 0.001), 8.29% fewer mean annualized per-patient outpatient visits (vs. UMEC + VI: 13.28 vs. 14.48, P = 0.031), 3.41% fewer mean annualized per-patient pharmacy fills (vs. other LAMA + LABAs: 56.92 vs. 58.93, P = 0.028), 19.48% and 22.28% lower mean annualized per-patient all-cause ED costs (vs. other LAMA + LABAs: $755 vs. $971, P < 0.001; vs. UMEC + VI: $749 vs. $930, P < 0.001), and 10.86% lower mean annualized per-patient outpatient setting costs (vs. UMEC + VI: $3,348 vs. $3,756, P = 0.050). There were no statistically significant differences for the other outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: In a real-world setting, differences in HCRU and costs were observed between FDC LAMA + LABAs, with patients initiating TIO + OLO having lower ED visits/costs, COPD-related pharmacy fills/costs, and all-cause pharmacy use and outpatient visits/costs than those initiating other FDC LAMA + LABAs or UMEC + VI specifically. The remaining HCRU and cost measures were not significantly different. DISCLOSURES: This study was sponsored by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (BIPI; Ridgefield, CT). BIPI was given the opportunity to review the manuscript for medical and scientific accuracy, as well as intellectual property considerations. Palli is an employee of BIPI. Xie, Chastek, Elliott, and Bengtson are employees of Optum, which was contracted by BIPI to conduct this study. The authors received no direct compensation related to the development of the manuscript. Part of the results of this study were accepted and presented at the 30th European Respiratory Society (ERS) International Congress (September 7-9, 2020; virtual).

Evaluation of treatment patterns and outcomes in patients diagnosed with genitourinary (GU) cancers with linked claims plus prior authorization data

284

Background: Integration of clinical and claims data allows for the examination of outcomes and characteristics which is essential for real world evidence generation and clinical decision making. We describe utilization of clinical data collected from an oncology Prior Authorization (PA) program integrated with claims data to evaluate treatment patterns, resource utilization, and total costs of care during therapy for patients with newly diagnosed metastatic and non-metastatic renal (R), bladder (B), and testicular (T) cancers. Methods: Commercially insured patients with a GU cancer diagnosis, from 2/2016 to 12/2019 with both clinical information from a PA tool (based on NCCN guidelines) and claims from the Optum Research Database were identified. Demographics, clinical information (metastatic status and line of therapy), treatment duration, resource utilization, and all-cause costs were collected, and uploaded to a dynamic web-based Tableau dashboard. Analysis was conducted for non-metastatic and metastatic settings based on the first observed treatment episode. Drug additions or switches incremented line of therapy; single drug discontinuations did not. All cost data were adjusted to 2019 values. Results: A total of 3,736 patients were included; 13% were censored (i.e. on treatment at the end of the study period). 916 patients (25%) were metastatic and 2,820 (75%) were in their adjuvant/neoadjuvant (A/N) line. 60% of the population was ≥55 years old and 85% were male. The top regimen in A/N line for each cancer type were: nivolumab (R), BCG(B), bleomycin + carboplatin/cisplatin+ etoposide (T). The top regimen in metastatic cancer were: nivolumab (R), carboplatin/cisplatin + gemcitabine (B), bleomycin + carboplatin/cisplatin + etoposide (T). The median duration of A/N line ranged from 50(B) to 119(R) days while the median duration for metastatic line range from 71(T) to 82(R) days. The highest rate of inpatient admissions was observed in patients with R (31%). Of the three cancers, R was the most expensive in the A/N and metastatic settings with mean (standard deviation) costs of $192,308 ($269,358) and $136,293 ($146,632), respectively. Conclusions: Combination of clinical and claims data provide valuable information on real world outcomes in routine clinical care and may support treatment selection decisions at the point of care.

Real-World Outcomes and Value of First-Line Therapy for Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer†

Although physicians rely on clinical trial data to guide cancer treatment decisions, patient characteristics and outcomes often differ between real-world and clinical trial populations. We analyzed retrospective clinical data collected from a prior authorization (PA) tool linked with payer claims data to describe outcomes of first-line treatment for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer among 2,108 patients. Duration of therapy was shorter than observed in clinical trials. Healthcare costs and hospitalizations varied substantially by regimen. PA clinical data linked with administrative claims enable head-to-head comparisons of contemporary cancer treatments used in routine clinical practice, which are not available from clinical trials.

Impact of mepolizumab on exacerbations in severe asthma: Results from a U.S. insurance claims data base

Background: In controlled clinical studies, mepolizumab has been shown to reduce exacerbation rates and the use of oral corticosteroids as well as improve asthma control and health-related quality of life compared with placebo in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma. However, real-world data on the impact of mepolizumab on clinical outcomes are limited. Objective: To evaluate the effect of mepolizumab on asthma exacerbations and asthma exacerbation-related costs in patients with severe asthma in U.S. clinical practice. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used U.S. administrative claims data from patients ages ≥12 years and with severe asthma at mepolizumab treatment initiation (index date; identification period, January 2015-June 2017) who had received two or more mepolizumab administrations within 180 days of the index date and had no evidence of treatment with another asthma biologic. The exacerbation rate and exacerbation-related costs were assessed in both the 12 months before mepolizumab initiation (baseline period) and the following 12 months (follow-up period). A clinical trial-like cohort was identified, defined as patients with two or more baseline exacerbations and ≥10 administrations during follow-up. Results: A total of 201 patients were included in the overall population and 74 patients in the clinical trial-like cohort. Mepolizumab significantly reduced the exacerbation rate between the baseline and follow-up periods in both the overall population and the clinical trial-like cohort (p < 0.001), which corresponded to 33.6% and 48.6% reductions, respectively. The rate of exacerbations in patients who required hospitalization between the baseline and follow-up periods was also reduced by 35.3% (p = 0.080) and 68.2% (p = 0.015) in the overall population and in the clinical trial-like cohort, respectively. Cost data were inconclusive. Conclusion: This study, which used real-world data, demonstrated that mepolizumab is associated with reductions in asthma exacerbations, in line with the findings from controlled clinical studies. These results provided further evidence of the effectiveness of mepolizumab in a real-world setting.

Osteoporotic fracture trends in a population of US managed care enrollees from 2007 to 2017

This study expands on previous findings that hip fracture rates may no longer be declining. We found that age- and sex-adjusted fracture rates in the US plateaued or increased through mid-2017 in a population of commercially insured and Medicare Advantage health plan enrollees, in contrast to a decline from 2007 to 2013.

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to evaluate fracture trends in US commercial and Medicare Advantage health plan members aged ≥ 50 years between 2007 and 2017.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of the Optum Research Database from January 1, 2007, to May 31, 2017.

RESULTS

Of 1,841,263 patients identified with an index fracture, 930,690 were case-qualifying and included in this analysis. The overall age- and sex-adjusted fracture rate decreased from 14.67/1000 person-years (py) in 2007 to 11.79/1000 py in 2013, followed by a plateau for the next 3 years and then an increase to 12.50/1000 py in mid-2017. In females aged ≥ 65 years, fracture rates declined from 27.49/1000 py in 2007 to 22.08/1000 py in 2013, then increased to 24.92/1000 py in mid-2017. Likewise, fracture rates in males aged ≥ 65 years declined from 2007 (12.00/1000 py) to 2013 (10.72/1000 py), then increased to 12.04/1000 py in mid-2017. The age- and sex-adjusted fracture rates for most fracture sites declined from 2007 to 2013 by 3.7% per year (P = 0.310).

CONCLUSIONS

Following a consistent decline in fracture rate from 2007 to 2013, trends from 2014 to 2017 indicate fracture rates are no longer declining and, for some fracture types, rates are rising.

Treatment Patterns Among Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis Treated with a Biologic in the United States: Descriptive Analyses from an Administrative Claims Database

BACKGROUND

In patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), limited data exist regarding patterns of biologic therapy use.

OBJECTIVE

To examine treatment patterns and therapy modifications in U.S. patients with PsA receiving a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) or an anti-interleukin (IL)-12/23 inhibitor.

METHODS

Adults with PsA who newly initiated a biologic therapy (index biologic) between January 1, 2013, and January 31, 2015, were included from the Optum Research Database. Biologic therapies comprised those that were approved by the FDA for the treatment of PsA at the time of the study initiation (adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab, or ustekinumab). Outcomes included adherence, persistence, and discontinuation of the index biologic; initiation of adjunctive medications (nonbiologics, including those commonly used for pain and/or inflammation); and dose escalation of the index biologic during the 12-month follow-up period.

RESULTS

Of the 1,235 patients included, 52.5% were female, and mean (SD) age was 50.3 (12.1) years. The mean (SD) duration of persistence with a newly initiated index biologic (etanercept [48.1%], adalimumab [24.0%], infliximab [10.4%], golimumab [8.3%], ustekinumab [7.2%], or certolizumab pegol [2.0%]) was 246 (128) days; 44.5% of patients persisted with the index biologic for ≥ 12 months. During the 12-month follow-up period, 22.9% of patients switched to a different biologic, 26.8% discontinued without switching or restarting, and 5.8% discontinued and restarted the index biologic. Of the 1,010 patients who persisted with the index biologic for > 90 days, 45.6% received ≥ 1 adjunctive medication during the period from 90 days after the index date to the end of persistence or 12 months. The most commonly initiated adjunctive medications were corticosteroids (22.0%), opioids (17.1%), and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (12.9%). Overall, 9.6% of patients had a dose escalation of the index biologic in the immediate 12-month post-index period.

CONCLUSIONS

This real-world study of treatment patterns for PsA, which used a large U.S. claims database, demonstrated that the majority of patients with PsA discontinued their index biologic (TNFi or anti-IL-12/23 inhibitor) before 12 months. Nearly half of patients initiated an adjunctive medication, many of which were pain and conventional anti-inflammatory medications.

DISCLOSURES

This study was sponsored by Novartis Pharmaceuticals. Optum was commissioned by Novartis to conduct this study, but employment was not contingent on results of the study. Walsh is a paid consultant for Novartis. Adejoro was an employee of Optum at the time of the study and writing of the manuscript. Chastek is an employee of Optum. Palmer and Hur are employees of Novartis. Results of this study were presented as an abstract and poster at the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy Nexus 2017; October 16-19, 2017; Dallas, TX; and the EULAR 2017 Annual European Congress of Rheumatology; June 14-17, 2017; Madrid, Spain.

Treatment Patterns Among Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis Treated with a Biologic in the United States: Descriptive Analyses from an Administrative Claims Database

BACKGROUND

In patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), limited data exist regarding patterns of biologic therapy use.

OBJECTIVE

To examine treatment patterns and therapy modifications in U.S. patients with PsA receiving a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) or an anti-interleukin (IL)-12/23 inhibitor.

METHODS

Adults with PsA who newly initiated a biologic therapy (index biologic) between January 1, 2013, and January 31, 2015, were included from the Optum Research Database. Biologic therapies comprised those that were approved by the FDA for the treatment of PsA at the time of the study initiation (adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab, or ustekinumab). Outcomes included adherence, persistence, and discontinuation of the index biologic; initiation of adjunctive medications (nonbiologics, including those commonly used for pain and/or inflammation); and dose escalation of the index biologic during the 12-month follow-up period.

RESULTS

Of the 1,235 patients included, 52.5% were female, and mean (SD) age was 50.3 (12.1) years. The mean (SD) duration of persistence with a newly initiated index biologic (etanercept [48.1%], adalimumab [24.0%], infliximab [10.4%], golimumab [8.3%], ustekinumab [7.2%], or certolizumab pegol [2.0%]) was 246 (128) days; 44.5% of patients persisted with the index biologic for ≥ 12 months. During the 12-month follow-up period, 22.9% of patients switched to a different biologic, 26.8% discontinued without switching or restarting, and 5.8% discontinued and restarted the index biologic. Of the 1,010 patients who persisted with the index biologic for > 90 days, 45.6% received ≥ 1 adjunctive medication during the period from 90 days after the index date to the end of persistence or 12 months. The most commonly initiated adjunctive medications were corticosteroids (22.0%), opioids (17.1%), and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (12.9%). Overall, 9.6% of patients had a dose escalation of the index biologic in the immediate 12-month post-index period.

CONCLUSIONS

This real-world study of treatment patterns for PsA, which used a large U.S. claims database, demonstrated that the majority of patients with PsA discontinued their index biologic (TNFi or anti-IL-12/23 inhibitor) before 12 months. Nearly half of patients initiated an adjunctive medication, many of which were pain and conventional anti-inflammatory medications. DISCLOSURES This study was sponsored by Novartis Pharmaceuticals. Optum was commissioned by Novartis to conduct this study, but employment was not contingent on results of the study. Walsh is a paid consultant for Novartis. Adejoro was an employee of Optum at the time of the study and writing of the manuscript. Chastek is an employee of Optum. Palmer and Hur are employees of Novartis. Study concept and design were contributed by Walsh, Chastek, Adejoro, Palmer, and Hur. Adejoro, Chastek, Walsh, Palmer, and Hur collected the data. Data interpretation was performed by Walsh, Palmer, Adejoro, Chastek, and Hur. The manuscript was written and revised by Walsh and Hur, along with the other authors. Results of this study were presented as an abstract and poster at the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy Nexus 2017; October 16-19, 2017; Dallas, Texas; and the EULAR 2017 Annual European Congress of Rheumatology; June 14-17, 2017; Madrid, Spain.

Treatment patterns of biologics in US patients with ankylosing spondylitis: descriptive analyses from a claims database

AIM

Examine treatment patterns among patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS) treated with a TNF inhibitor (TNFi).

PATIENTS & METHODS

Patients with AS who initiated a TNFi between 1 January 2013, and 31 January 2015, were identified in the Optum Research Database. Outcomes included adherence, persistence, discontinuation and therapy modifications of the index TNFi during 12-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Of the 426 patients included, 40.6% persisted on the index TNFi for ≥12 months, 31.0% discontinued, 21.4% switched to a different TNFi, and 7.0% discontinued and then restarted. Of the 333 patients who persisted on their TNFi for >90 days, 44.7% received ≥1 add-on medication.

CONCLUSION

A high proportion of patients with AS switched, discontinued or modified their TNFi therapy.

Treatment Persistence and Healthcare Costs Among Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Changing Biologics in the USA

Introduction

After a patient with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) fails tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) treatment, clinical guidelines support either cycling to another TNFi or switching to a different mechanism of action (MOA), but payers often require TNFi cycling before they reimburse switching MOA. This study examined treatment persistence, cost, and cost per persistent patient among MOA switchers versus TNFi cyclers.

Methods

This study of Commercial and Medicare Advantage claims data from the Optum Research Database included patients with RA and at least one claim for a TNFi (adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, or infliximab) between January 2012 and September 2015 who changed to another TNFi or a different MOA therapy (abatacept, tocilizumab, or tofacitinib) within 1 year. The index date was the date of the change in therapy. Treatment persistence was defined as no subsequent switch or 60-day gap in therapy for 1 year post-index. RA-related costs included plan-paid and patient-paid amounts for inpatient, outpatient, and pharmacy claims. Medication costs included index and post-index costs of TNFi and different MOA therapies.

Results

There were 581 (38.3%) MOA switchers and 935 (61.7%) TNFi cyclers. The treatment persistence rate was significantly higher for MOA switchers versus TNFi cyclers (47.7% versus 40.2%, P = 0.004). Mean 1-year healthcare costs were significantly lower among MOA switchers versus TNFi cyclers for total RA-related costs ($37,804 versus $42,116; P < 0.001) and medication costs ($29,001 versus $34,917; P < 0.001). When costs were divided by treatment persistence, costs per persistent patient were lower among MOA switchers versus TNFi cyclers: $25,436 lower total RA-related cost and $25,999 lower medication costs.

Conclusion

MOA switching is associated with higher treatment persistence and lower healthcare costs than TNFi cycling. Reimbursement policies that require patients to cycle TNFi before switching MOA may result in suboptimal outcomes for both patients and payers.

Funding

Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals.

Variations in inpatient stays for non-metastatic HER2- breast cancer (BC), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and colorectal cancer (CRC) in a real world setting

e18099

Background: We aim to compareprevalence and duration of inpatient stays during the most commonly used chemotherapy regimens for BC, NSCLC, and CRC in a commercially insured population. Methods: This analysis used clinical data obtained from a prior authorization program for chemotherapy linked with administrative claims data from 6/1/2015 to 5/31/2016. Clinical data included cancer type, stage at diagnosis, relevant biomarkers, and evidence of progression/relapse. Eligible patients included commercially insured members with a prior authorization request for one of the most commonly used NCCN recommended regimens for BC, NSCLC and CRC. Outcomes, including percent of patients experiencing an inpatient stay and number of inpatient days were tracked from the first claim for chemotherapy until end of treatment due to discontinuation, death or change in treatment, with remaining patients censored at 5/31/2016 or end of enrollment. Results: There were 1612 HER2- BC, 237 NSCLC, and 386 CRC patients who completed therapy during the study period. Incidence and inpatient stay days per 100 patient months for the most common regimens for each cancer are summarized in the table. Conclusions: The rates and duration of inpatient stays varied substantially across the most commonly used therapies for BC, NSCLC and CRC. These data show the importance of systematically incorporating the impact of hospitalizations alongside other clinical outcomes in treatment choice in routine clinical practice. As the database grows over time, these data will help clinicians and patients better evaluate regimen choices for various cancers. [Table: see text]

Describing the value of the most common first line NSCLC regimens in a real world setting

9046

Background: We aim to describe clinical and economic outcomes of common chemotherapy regimens for first line therapy of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC).The data are intended to help clinicians and patients understand the real world results for patients like themselves. Methods: This retrospective analysis used clinical data obtained from a prior authorization (PA) program for chemotherapy linked with administrative claims data from 6/1/2015 to 5/31/2016 from a large national managed care organization. Clinical data included cancer type, stage at diagnosis, biomarkers, treatment line and evidence of progression/relapse. Eligible patients were commercially insured members with a PA request for commonly used NCCN recommended regimens for first line therapy of mNSCLC. Outcomes, including duration of therapy, % of patients hospitalized and total cost of care were tracked from first claim for chemotherapy until end of treatment due to discontinuation, death or start of a second line, with remaining patients censored at 5/31/2016 or end of enrollment. Results: Of 830 mNSCLC patients, 498 (60%) completed first line therapy during the study period. 345 initiated one of the following: Carbo/cisplatin + pemetrexed (CA), Carbo/cisplatin + paclitaxel (CP), Carbo/cisplatin + bevacizumab + pemetrexed (CBA), nivolumab (N), and docetaxal (D). Outcomes are summarized in the Table. Conclusions: Patients treated with the five most commonly prescribed first line therapies for mNSCLC have much shorter duration of therapies (52-76 days) than reported in published clinical trials with a significant risk of hospitalization (18% -30%) and at substantial cost ($34,971 - $108,100). These data are an important consideration for the patient and clinician making treatment decisions in routine clinical practice and will become more valuable as the database grows over time. [Table: see text]

Variations in cost for non-metastatic HER2- breast cancer (BC), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and colorectal cancer (CRC)

e18106

Background: We aim to quantify economic outcomes of the most commonly used chemotherapy regimens for BC, NSCLC, and CRC in a commercially insured population. Methods: This analysis used clinical data from a prior authorization program for chemotherapy regimens linked with administrative claims data from 6/1/2015 to 5/31/2016. Clinical data included cancer type, stage at diagnosis, and biomarkers. Eligible patients were commercially insured members with a prior authorization request for one of the most commonly used NCCN recommended regimens for BC, NSCLC and CRC. Outcomes, including total healthcare cost and cost of chemotherapy were tracked from first claim for chemotherapy until end of treatment due to discontinuation, death or change in treatment. Patients were censored at 5/31/2016 or end of enrollment. Results: There were 1612 BC, 237 NSCLC, and 386 CRC non-censored patients who received therapy during the study period. Mean (SD) total and monthly drug costs and total health care costs for the most common regimens by cancer are summarized in the table. Conclusions: The relative value of the most common therapies for BC, NSCLC, and CRC varied significantly depending on the metric used underscoring the importance of comparing total healthcare costs when assessing the value of therapies. Information on these and other regimens will increase as the database grows over time. [Table: see text]

Outcomes of tumor necrosis factor inhibitor cycling versus switching to a disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug with a new mechanism of action among patients with rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVES

To examine treatment patterns, treatment effectiveness, and treatment costs for 1 year after patients with rheumatoid arthritis switched from a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) (adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, or infliximab), either cycling to another TNFi ("TNFi cyclers") or switching to a new mechanism of action (abatacept, tocilizumab, or tofacitinib) ("new MOA switchers").

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used administrative claims data for a national insurer. Treatment persistence (without switching again, restarting, or discontinuing), treatment effectiveness (defined below), and costs were assessed for the 12-month post-switch period. Patients were "effectively treated" if they satisfied all six criteria for a treatment effectiveness algorithm (high adherence, no dose increase, no new conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, no subsequent switch in therapy, no new/increased oral glucocorticoids, and <2 glucocorticoid injections). Multivariable logistic models were used to adjust for baseline factors.

RESULTS

The database included 581 new MOA switchers and 935 TNFi cyclers. New MOA switchers were 39% more likely than TNFi cyclers to persist after the switch (odds ratio [OR] = 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.12-1.74; p = .003) and 36% less likely to switch therapy again (OR = 0.64; 95% CI = 0.51-0.81; p < .001). New MOA switchers were 43% more likely than TNFi cyclers to be effectively treated (OR = 1.43; 95% CI = 1.11-1.85; p = .006). New MOA switchers had 16% lower drug costs than TNFi cyclers (cost ratio = 0.84; 95% CI = 0.79-0.88; p < .001) and 11% lower total costs of rheumatoid arthritis-related medical care (cost ratio = 0.89; 95% CI = 0.84-0.94; p < .001).

LIMITATIONS

Claims payments may not reflect rebates or other cost offsets. Medical and pharmacy claims do not include clinical end-points or reasons that lead to new MOA switching vs TNFi cycling.

CONCLUSIONS

These results support switching to a new MOA after a patient fails treatment with a TNFi, which is consistent with recent guidelines for the pharmacologic management of established rheumatoid arthritis.

Economic Burden of Illness Among Patients with Severe Asthma in a Managed Care Setting

BACKGROUND

Despite intensive pharmacotherapy, a considerable number of patients with severe asthma have inadequate disease control. Patients with severe asthma who experience exacerbations consume significant health care resources.

OBJECTIVE

To assess health care resource utilization and associated costs among patients with persistent severe asthma who experienced exacerbations compared with patients with persistent but nonsevere asthma.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis of a national administrative claims database identified patients aged ≥ 12 years who had at least 1 medical claim with an asthma diagnosis in 2012 and had continuous medical and pharmacy coverage under a commercial or Medicare Advantage plan from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2013. Patients were assigned to 1 of 2 mutually exclusive cohorts-persistent asthma (PA) or severe asthma (SA)-according to an established algorithm based on asthma-related health care resource use and pharmacy claims for controller medication. SA patients were required to meet PA criteria and also have evidence of ≥2 asthma exacerbations in 2012. Asthma-related health care resource utilization and costs were computed from asthma medication use (rescue and controller therapy) and medical claims with an asthma diagnosis in the primary position in 2012 and 2013. Adherence to controller therapy was assessed over 365 days by using the proportion of days covered (PDC), starting with the first claim for controller therapy in 2012. Differences between the PA and SA cohorts were analyzed by t-test for continuous variables and chi-square test for categorical variables. Asthma-related costs in 2013 were also analyzed using a generalized linear model with a gamma distribution and log link, adjusted for patient demographics (age, gender, region, and insurance type) and Quan-Charlson comorbidity score.

RESULTS

A total of 65,359 patients were included: 63,597 (97.3%) PA patients and 1,762 SA patients (2.7%). Compared with the PA cohort, the SA cohort was older (mean age = 50.8 years vs. 46.5 years, P < 0.001) and had higher mean comorbidity score (1.47 vs. 1.31, P< 0.001). The mean count of all asthma medications fills was 2.2-fold (2012) and 2.1-fold (2013) higher in the SA cohort, compared with the PA cohort (P< 0.001). Mean PDC for all oral and inhaled controller therapy was also higher in the SA cohort compared with the PA cohort (0.80 vs. 0.65, P< 0.001). SA patients had a significantly greater mean count of asthma-related hospitalizations, emergency room visits, and ambulatory visits in 2012 and 2013 (P< 0.001). Unadjusted mean annual asthma-related costs in the SA versus PA cohorts were $6,496 versus $2,739 (P < 0.001) in 2012 and $5,174 versus $1,775 (P< 0.001) in 2013. Higher asthma-related costs were driven by greater mean annual asthma medication costs in 2012 ($4,545 vs. $1,738, P< 0.001) and 2013 ($4,068 vs. $1,348, P< 0.001). Adjusted mean annual asthma-related costs in 2013 were $3,336 greater (cost ratio=2.878, P< 0.001) in the SA cohort, and adjusted mean annual asthma medication costs were $2,672 higher (cost ratio=2.982, P< 0.001) in the SA cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with SA who experienced 2 or more exacerbations had 2.1-fold greater use of controller medications across both study years and were more adherent to controller therapy than patients with PA. Despite more intensive pharmacotherapy, SA patients incurred 2.9-fold higher adjusted asthma-related costs and 3-fold higher adjusted asthma medication costs than PA patients. Patients with SA consistently demonstrated a higher rate of health care utilization.

DISCLOSURES

Funding for this study (HO-14-14443) was provided by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK). All listed authors meet the criteria for authorship set forth by the International Committee for Medical Journal Editors. Albers, Forshag, and Yancey are employees of GSK and hold stock in GSK. Dalal, Nagar, and Ortega were employees of GSK at the time this research was conducted. Chastek and Korrer are employees of Optum, which received consulting fees from GSK for research related to this study. Study concept and design were contributed by Chastek, Nagar, and Dalal. Korrer took the lead in data collection, along with Chastek, and data interpretation was performed by Chastek, Ortega, Forshag, and Dalal. The manuscript was written by Chastek and Dalal and revised by Albers and Yancy, assisted by the other authors.

Cost and effectiveness of biologics for rheumatoid arthritis in a commercially insured population

BACKGROUND

Administrative claims contain detailed medication, diagnosis, and procedure data, but the lack of clinical outcomes for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) historically has limited their use in comparative effectiveness research. A claims-based algorithm was developed and validated to estimate effectiveness for RA from data for adherence, dosing, and treatment modifications.

OBJECTIVE

To implement the claims-based algorithm in a U.S. managed care database to estimate biologic cost per effectively treated patient.

METHODS

The cohort included patients with RA aged 18-63 years in the Optum Research Database who initiated biologic treatment between January 2007 and December 2010 and were continuously enrolled 6 months before through 12 months after the first claim for the biologic (the index date). Patients were categorized as effectively treated by the claims-based algorithm if they met all of the following 6 criteria in the 12-month post-index period: (1) a medication possession ratio ≥ 80% for subcutaneous biologics, or at least as many infusions as specified in U.S. labeling for intravenous biologics; (2) no increase in biologic dose; (3) no switch in biologics; (4) no new nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug; (5) no new or increased oral glucocorticoid treatment; and (6) no more than 1 glucocorticoid injection. Drug costs (all biologics) and administration costs (intravenous biologics) were obtained from allowed amounts on claims. Biologic cost per effectively treated patient was defined as total 1-year biologic cost divided by the number of patients categorized by the algorithm as effectively treated with that index biologic. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to examine the total health care costs per effectively treated patient during the first year of biologic therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 5,474 individuals were included in the analysis. The index biologic was categorized as effective by the algorithm for 28.9% of patients overall, including 30.6% for subcutaneous biologics and 22.1% for intravenous biologics. The index biologic was categorized as effective in the first year for 32.7% of etanercept (794/2,425), 32.3% of golimumab (40/124), 30.2% of abatacept (89/295), 27.7% of adalimumab (514/1,857), and 19.0% of infliximab (147/773) patients. Mean 1-year biologic cost per effectively treated patient, as defined in the algorithm, was lowest for etanercept ($43,935), followed by golimumab ($49,589), adalimumab ($52,752), abatacept ($62,300), and infliximab ($101,402). The rank order in the sensitivity analysis was the same, except for golimumab and etanercept. 

CONCLUSIONS

Using a claims-based algorithm in a large commercial claims database, etanercept was the most effective and had the lowest biologic cost per effectively treated patient with RA.

Differences in survival for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer by lines of treatment received and stage at original diagnosis

OBJECTIVE

Few published studies have examined survival rates for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) by number of lines of treatment received or stage at diagnosis. This study aims to evaluate survival and numbers of lines of treatment in USA mCRC managed care patients.

METHODS

To evaluate the impact of chemotherapy/biological on survival of patients with mCRC, adults with a diagnosis of CRC between 1 January 2005 and 31 May 2010 were identified from the Oncology Management registry. Registry data included stage and diagnosis date. Patients with stage IV CRC at original diagnosis or development of metastasis were included. Linked healthcare claims from a large USA database were used to identify lines of treatment after metastasis and patient characteristics. The patient population was enrolled in a commercial health insurance programme, with 10% of patients > 65 years of age. Patients were categorised by lines of treatment received (0, 1, 2, 3+) and stage at original diagnosis (0-3, 4, unknown). Survival following metastasis was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models controlling for lines of treatment, disease stage, and other patient characteristics.

RESULTS

Study population included commercially insured adult patients, ≥ 18 years of age (n = 598, mean age 54, 56% male), 16% of which did not receive chemotherapy/biological therapy after becoming metastatic, and 33% received only 1 line of treatment. Average follow-up was 653 days, and 19% of patients died during the study period. Mean unadjusted length of follow-up was 516, 511, 627 and 930 days for patients who received 0, 1, 2 and 3+ lines of treatment, respectively. In the Cox proportional hazards model, geographical region was the only variable significantly associated with survival (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Lines of treatment received and stage at original diagnosis were not statistically significantly associated with survival after metastasis development.

Impact of metastatic colorectal cancer stage and number of treatment courses on patient health care costs and utilization

BACKGROUND

Advances in colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment and improved survival rates have led to higher costs associated with treating CRC.

OBJECTIVE

To examine health care costs and utilization by initial CRC stage at diagnosis and the number of lines of treatment received by patients with metastatic CRC.

METHODS

Adult patients with a diagnosis of CRC made from January 1, 2005 to May 31, 2010 were identified from the Oncology Management registry. Patients with stage IV CRC at initial diagnosis or who had advanced to stage IV CRC at the time of the study were included. Registry data included initial CRC stage and the date of diagnosis. Linked health care claims from a large US health insurance database affiliated with Optum were used to identify health care costs and patient characteristics. Multivariate regression analysis was used to estimate total 4-year health care costs stratified by stage and adjusted for patient characteristics. Follow-up ended at patient death, disenrollment from the health care plan, or study end (November 30, 2010).

RESULTS

A total of 598 patients, followed for an average of 653 days after first evidence of metastasis, were included. At initial diagnosis, 91 patients had stages 0 to III CRC, 310 patients had stage IV CRC, and 197 patients had an unknown stage of CRC. The mean unadjusted total cost per patient (medical + pharmaceutical costs) was $252 200; outpatient hospital visits (excluding radiation and surgery) contributed most to the total cost, at a mean cost of $71 334. Hospitalization costs, with or without surgery (mean, $56 862), accounted for 33% of the $176 135 unadjusted mean cost for medical services (ambulatory visits [office and outpatient], emergency department visits, laboratory/radiology services, and inpatient admission). Chemotherapy and biologics were also costly (mean, $31 112 and $38 276, respectively). A general linear model analysis of estimated 4-year total costs showed that both CRC stage at diagnosis and the number of lines of treatment after metastasis had a statistically significant association with cost (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Variables that had a statistically significant association with cost (P < 0.05) were sex, age group, and follow-up Charlson Comorbidity Index score after metastases. After adjusting for the number of lines of treatment received, total 4-year costs were highest among patients who presented with stage IV CRC and lowest among patients who presented with stage III CRC and developed metastatic disease.

Etanercept and adalimumab treatment patterns in psoriatic arthritis patients enrolled in a commercial health plan

INTRODUCTION

Treatment patterns, including persistence, gaps in therapy, switching, and discontinuation, were examined in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) who received the tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-blockers etanercept or adalimumab.

METHODS

This retrospective study utilized administrative claims data from a United States commercial health plan. Adults (age 18-64 years) with PsA who started therapy with etanercept or adalimumab as index therapy between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2008 were included in the analysis. Patients were continuously enrolled in the health plan for at least 6 months before and at least 12 months after the start of index therapy. Initial TNF-blocker dose and rates of therapy persistence (continuous use of index medication without a gap of at least 60 days), therapy gaps, and discontinuation (gap in therapy of at least 60 days) were estimated. Those who discontinued were further classified as: (1) discontinued all biologic therapy, (2) restarted index medication, (3) switched to another biologic therapy, or (4) other.

RESULTS

A total of 346 patients with PsA (202 etanercept, 144 adalimumab) were eligible. Most (90.6% etanercept; 88.9% adalimumab) started index therapy at the labeled dose. Persistence with index therapy for 12 months was observed in 50% of patients on etanercept and 45% of patients on adalimumab (P = 0.37). Patients on etanercept had a longer duration of persistence (434 vs. 353 days; P = 0.02), more pauses of at least 7 days (4.7 vs. 3.5; P = 0.004), and a longer mean pause length (48.6 vs. 29.3 days; P = 0.01) than patients on adalimumab. Of patients who discontinued (24.8% etanercept; 35.1% adalimumab), 46.4% and 41.5% restarted etanercept and adalimumab, respectively; 24.8% and 35.1% discontinued all TNF-blockers; 20.0% and 19.2% switched to another biologic; and 8.8% and 4.3% had other therapy changes.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately half of PsA patients were persistent on their index TNF-blocker for 12 months. Pauses in therapy and therapy discontinuation were common, but more than 40% of patients restarted their index TNF-blocker after discontinuation.

Health care costs for patients with cancer at the end of life

PURPOSE

With rising health care costs in the United States, clearly defined end-of-life (EOL) cancer costs are needed to help health administrators proactively manage this important care. Our objective was to examine EOL health care resource costs among oncology patients in a US commercial insurance population.

METHODS

A retrospective claims database affiliated with OptumInsight was analyzed. Included patients had: a medical claim with cancer diagnosis between July 1, 2002, and December 31, 2009; death on or before December 31, 2009; continuous enrollment with medical/pharmacy benefits from diagnosis until death; ≥ 180 follow-up days; and active cancer in the last 6 months before death (MBD). Death was captured from facility discharge codes or Social Security Administration death files. Costs were determined by summing paid amounts on all services utilized within the last 6 MBD: cancer-related inpatient (IP) stays, cancer- related hospice care, and cancer-related outpatient (OP) services (ie, chemotherapy, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, granulocyte colony-stimulating factors, radiation, cancer-related office or emergency room visits, cancer-related hospital OP procedures, and other services with cancer diagnosis).

RESULTS

A total of 28,530 patients met inclusion criteria. Mean total cancer-related costs in the last 6 MBD were $74,212 (standard deviation, $112,740), comprising IP costs of $40,702 (55%), OP costs of $30,254 (41%), and hospice costs of $3,256 (4%). OP costs decreased from $6,021 in the sixth MBD to $2,238 in the last MBD, whereas IP care costs increased from $1,785 to $20,559. Hospice utilization increased from 0.7% in the sixth MBD to 35.6% in the last MBD.

CONCLUSION

Oncology costs increase in the last 6 MBD largely because of increased IP costs, whereas OP costs decrease.

Psoriasis treatment patterns with etanercept and adalimumab in a United States health plan population

BACKGROUND

A retrospective study utilizing administrative claims from a US commercial health plan was performed to examine etanercept and adalimumab treatment patterns among patients with psoriasis (PSO).

METHODS

Biologic-naïve PSO patients initiating etanercept or adalimumab therapy between 18 January 2008 and 31 December 2008 were identified. Patients continuously enrolled in the health plan for 6 months before and ≥12 months after therapy initiation were followed until disenrollment from the plan or 31 December 2009. Persistence was defined as continuous use of index TNF blocker without a gap in therapy ≥60 days. Patients with gaps in index therapy ≥60 days were classified as discontinuing, switching, or restarting the index therapy.

RESULTS

In total, 497 patients initiated etanercept and 330 the adalimumab therapy. Mean age for both groups was 43 years. Approximately 40-42% of patients were persistent on their index TNF blocker for 1 year. Among patients with a ≥60-day gap in therapy, discontinuation without restart or switch occurred in 37% of etanercept and 45% of adalimumab patients (p = 0.04). Differences in therapy restart or switching between the groups were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

TNF-blocker therapy persistence is low among PSO patients in this health plan. More than one-third of patients restarted their index TNF blocker after a gap in therapy.

Differences in survival for metastatic colorectal cancer patients by lines of therapy received

e14016

Background: Improvements in survival for advanced-stage CRC patients who receive chemotherapy have been reported. We compared survival rates for patients with 3+ vs. <3 lines of therapy. Methods: Adult patients with a diagnosis of CRC between 01/01/05 and 05/31/10 were identified from the Impact Intelligence Oncology Management (IIOM) registry. Patients with either stage 4 CRC at original diagnosis or development of metastasis were included. Registry data included original stage and date of diagnosis. Linked healthcare claims from the Life Sciences Research Database, a large US health insurance database affiliated with OptumInsight, were used to identify lines of therapy after metastases and patient characteristics. Death data were obtained from the Social Security Administration’s master death file. Patients were categorized by number of lines of therapy received (0, 1, 2, 3+) and original stage at diagnosis (0-2, 3, 4, unknown). Survival following metastases was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models controlling for lines of therapy received, stage, and other patient characteristics. Results: 598 patients, followed for a mean of 653 days after becoming metastatic, were included. Mean unadjusted length of follow-up was lowest among patients who received no chemotherapy (516 days) or only 1 line (511 days), and increased to 627 days for those with 2 lines and 930 days for those with 3+ lines. However, multivariate analysis indicated that patients with 3+ lines had comparable survival vs. those with 0 (HR=0.79), 1 (HR=1.59), or 2 (HR=1.15) lines of therapy (p>0.05 for all comparisons). Compared to patients who presented with stage 4 CRC, those who progressed from stage 0-2 (HR=1.22), stage 3 (HR=0.83), or unknown stage (HR=1.18) had similar survival after metastases (p>0.05 for all comparisons). After excluding 94 patients who didn’t receive chemotherapy, patients treated with an oxaliplatin-based regimen (HR=1.28; p=0.24) in first line had similar survival compared to patients treated with an irinotecan-based or anti-EGFR regimen in first line. Conclusions: Lines of therapy received and initial stage were not associated with survival after development of metastases.

Treatment patterns among metastatic colorectal cancer patients by line of therapy and original stage of diagnosis

e14013

Background: National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend use of approved biologics combined with common chemotherapy agents for treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Five classes of chemotherapy/biologics are available for treatment of CRC. Methods: Adult patients with a diagnosis of CRC between 01/01/05 and 05/31/10 were identified from the Impact Intelligence Oncology Management (IIOM) registry. Patients with either stage 4 CRC at original diagnosis or development of a metastasis were included. Registry data included original date of diagnosis and stage information. Linked healthcare claims from a large US health insurance database affiliated with OptumInsight were used to identify lines of therapy and patient characteristics (e.g., development of metastases). Lines of therapy were based on patients’ use of chemotherapy/biologic agents after becoming metastatic. Treatment regimens were assessed and stratified by line of therapy (1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th) and stage at diagnosis (0-2, 3, 4, unknown). Results: 16% of the 598 study patients who developed metastasis received no chemotherapy. Of those who did, 84%, 52%, 27%, and 14% received a 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th line of therapy, respectively. 71% of patients who progressed from stage 0-2 or 3 received a 2nd line compared to 90% of patients who initially presented with stage 4 CRC. In the 1st line, 59% received an oxaliplatin-based regimen, 15% received an irinotecan-based regimen, and 11% received 5-FU alone. In 2nd and 3rd line therapy, percentages of patients treated with irinotecan-based regimens increased to 45% and 50%, respectively, and use of oxaliplatin-based regimens dropped to 27% and 16%, respectively. Overall, use of anti-EGFR agents increased steadily from 4% in the 1st line to 12%, 29%, and 38%, respectively in the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th lines. Conclusions: Patients who presented with stage 4 CRC had the highest rates of chemotherapy use. Despite NCCN guidelines, 11% of patients received 5-FU monotherapy as 1st line treatment.

Timing of testing for K-ras mutational status in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)

441

Background: The objective of this study was to examine physician perspectives on K-ras testing in mCRC at two time points: diagnosis of mCRC and after treatment failure.

Methods: Interviews were conducted with 16 oncologists experienced in treating mCRC to obtain information on treatment patterns. Based upon the interview data, a two-round Delphi panel web survey was then used to obtain consensus on specific percentages of patients in a separate sample of 25 oncologists. Both samples were asked to respond to two scenarios: at metastatic diagnosis and after treatment failure.

Results: The majority of interviewed physicians reported that they primarily test at diagnosis of mCRC versus later in treatment. Both the interviewed physicians and Delphi respondents said most patients have a tissue sample available at metastatic diagnosis for K-ras testing (Delphi median 90%, mean 81.2% at diagnosis, 78.8% after treatment failure). For patients without tissue, it was stated that a tissue sample would be obtainable in most patients (Delphi median 90%, mean 87.8% at diagnosis, 85.8% after treatment failure). Of patients with K-ras wild-type mCRC, the Delphi panel estimated that 75-80% would receive an EGFR inhibitor (mean 75.5% at diagnosis, 81.5% after treatment failure, median 80%) while only 0-5% of patients with K-ras mutated mCRC would receive an EGFR inhibitor (mean 4.6% at diagnosis, 5.3% at EGFR decision, median 0%). For a scenario where K-ras information is unknown, the Delphi panel estimated that a small percentage of patients may receive EGFR inhibitors (at diagnosis: mean 12.2%, median 5%; after treatment failure: mean 14.1%, median 0%) although it was noted this is uncommon and many insurers will not cover EGFR inhibitors without K-ras status.

Conclusions: Current guidelines for mCRC recommend that K-ras testing be conducted as part of the diagnostic workup. In this study, two samples of oncologists reported that the majority of patients they treat are tested for K-ras mutations at metastatic diagnosis rather than later in therapy. Both samples reported minimal use of EGFR inhibitors in patients with K-ras mutated mCRC or patients with unknown K-ras status, consistent with clinical guidelines and many insurance policies.

Economic burden of resected squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in a US managed-care population

BACKGROUND

Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) places a high burden on society and poses complex challenges to healthcare providers.

METHODS

Retrospective claims-based analysis of commercially insured patients identified between 01-31-04 and 12-31-07 with diagnostic evidence of cancer of the lip, tongue, oral cavity, pharynx, or larynx who underwent surgical resection during identification period. Outcomes included treatment patterns, healthcare utilization, and costs. All study variables were analyzed descriptively.

RESULTS

Among the 1104 patients in the final study sample, 71.9% were male, with mean age 56.6 years. On average, patients were followed for 830 days (range of mean days: 805 for lip or tongue cancer to 847 for pharyngeal cancer). About half received radiation therapy during follow-up, whereas only 16.2% received chemotherapy. Patients with pharyngeal cancer were most likely to undergo chemotherapy. After their index surgery, 57.9% of patients had ≥1 inpatient stay, 44.9% had ≥1 ER visit, and all had ≥1 ambulatory visit. The percentage with ≥1 inpatient stay post-index was highest among patients with pharyngeal cancer (73.0%) and lowest in the laryngeal cancer cohort (49.5%). Mean number of hospitalized days, ER visits, and ambulatory visits was 0.45, 0.69, and 27.4, respectively, per-patient per-year. Overall, patients incurred ~$94 million in cost following index surgery ($85,000 per-person, on average). Mean total healthcare cost was $34,450 per-patient per-year, the bulk of which comprised medical expenses ($32,401). The highest mean healthcare cost was incurred by the pharyngeal cancer cohort ($40,214).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with resected SCCHN incur substantial healthcare costs and have high utilization rates. Results of this analysis are primarily applicable to resected SCCHN in a managed-care setting, and therefore may not be generalizable to the entire US population. Furthermore, disease stage is an important factor impacting outcomes, but these analyses did not stratify patients according to disease stage.

Abstract P1-09-02: Health Care Costs Incurred by Post-Menopausal Women with Hormone-Positive Breast Cancer Following the Initial Diagnosis of Metastasis

Objectives: Estimate the healthcare costs before and after progression to chemotherapy in a population of post-menopausal hormone-receptor positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients. Methods:

This retrospective cohort study used claims from a large national US health plan. Females age 55 to 63 were selected if they were diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer between 7/1/01 and 12/31/07, and initiated hormonal therapy before progressing to chemotherapy. Incident metastatic patients were followed until the earliest of disenrollment from the health plan, death, or 12/31/08. The pre-chemotherapy period was defined as the period between the incident diagnosis of metastases and the earlier of the initiation of chemotherapy and the end of the study period. Among the subset of patients with use of chemotherapy, the post-chemotherapy period was defined as the time following chemotherapy initiation until the end of the study. Inflation-adjusted costs were examined during the pre-and post-chemotherapy periods. Descriptive analyses were supplemented with Kaplan-Meier sample-average to adjust for variable follow-up time and censoring. Results:

A total of 1,202 patients were identified, 366 (30.4%) of whom progressed to chemotherapy following the onset of metastases. The mean age ± SD was 58.9 ± 2.6 years.

On average, patients incurred $79,139 (SD± $121,489) per year in total health care costs before the initiation of chemotherapy and $132,786 (SD± $117,635) after the initiation of chemotherapy. In the pre-chemotherapy and post-chemotherapy phases, medical expenses were $74,149 (SD± $119,838) and $120,942 (SD± $116,225) per patient-year, respectively, while outpatient medications filled at a retail pharmacy or through a mail system pharmacy cost $4,990 (SD± $5033) and $11,843 (SD± $14,431) per patient-year, respectively. On average, most of the observed medical expenses were incurred during outpatient visits with $44,405 (SD± $55,710) and $87,299 (SD± $75,360) per patient-year in the pre-and post-chemotherapy phases respectively. Inpatient stays accounted for $27,147 (SD± $101,405) and $30,118 (SD± $73,216) per patient-year during the pre-and post-chemotherapy periods, respectively. ER visits cost an average of $424 (SD± $1,871) per patient-year during the pre-chemotherapy period and $1,274 (SD± $5,686) per patient-year during the post chemotherapy period, on average. During the post-chemotherapy period, combined costs for both inpatient and outpatient chemotherapy were $33,559 (SD± $38,692) per patient-year on average, and costs for services associated with supportive care for chemotherapy during the same time period accounted for an additional $18,676 (SD± $30,281) per patient-year on average. After adjusting for variable follow-up times, cumulative total healthcare costs were $54,725, $73,107, and $84,200 for years one, two, and three of the pre-chemotherapy period, respectively, and were $92,639, $148,228, and $176,163 during the same portions of the post-chemotherapy period. Conclusions:

Post-menopausal HR+ mBC patients incur significant healthcare costs both before and after progressing to chemotherapy. The main cost driver was medical costs in both the pre-and post-chemotherapy periods.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-09-02.

Evaluation of hospitalization and follow-up care costs among patients hospitalized with ACS treated with a stent and clopidogrel

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective claims study was performed to evaluate the initial and subsequent healthcare costs in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who had been treated with stent placement and clopidogrel following discharge from the hospital.

METHOD AND RESULTS

This was a retrospective, administrative claims-based analysis from a large, geographically diverse US managed care plan affiliated with i3 Innovus. Study subjects were commercially insured enrollees, aged > or = 18, who were hospitalized for ACS between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2004 with a stent placed, and had at least one filled prescription for clopidogrel within 7 days of discharge from the index hospitalization. Of the 9135 subjects included in the cost analysis, 2241 subjects experienced a subsequent event. On average, subjects with a second event incurred $32,495 more in medical costs over 2 years and $39,742 more in medical costs over 3 years versus those who did not have a second event. Excluding ischemic hospitalizations, subjects with a second event incurred $7257 and $9724 more in medical costs than patients without a second event during the 2 and 3 years following discharge from the index hospitalization, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant cost increases were observed among patients who had a subsequent hospitalization for an ischemic event compared to those without a subsequent hospitalization. Cost increases were still present after excluding costs of the ischemic hospitalizations. The findings of this study must be considered within the limitations of database analysis as claims data are collected for the purpose of payment and not research.