The Structural Basis of Peptide Binding at Class A G Protein-Coupled Receptors

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent the largest membrane protein family and a significant target class for therapeutics. Receptors from GPCRs’ largest class, class A, influence virtually every aspect of human physiology. About 45% of the members of this family endogenously bind flexible peptides or peptides segments within larger protein ligands. While many of these peptides have been structurally characterized in their solution state, the few studies of peptides in their receptor-bound state suggest that these peptides interact with a shared set of residues and undergo significant conformational changes. For the purpose of understanding binding dynamics and the development of peptidomimetic drug compounds, further studies should investigate the peptide ligands that are complexed to their cognate receptor.

Improving homology modeling from low-sequence identity templates in Rosetta: A case study in GPCRs

As sequencing methodologies continue to advance, the availability of protein sequences far outpaces the ability of structure determination. Homology modeling is used to bridge this gap but relies on high-identity templates for accurate model building. G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent a significant target class for pharmaceutical therapies in which homology modeling could fill the knowledge gap for structure-based drug design. To date, only about 17% of druggable GPCRs have had their structures characterized at atomic resolution. However, modeling of the remaining 83% is hindered by the low sequence identity between receptors. Here we test key inputs in the model building process using GPCRs as a focus to improve the pipeline in two critical ways: Firstly, we use a blended sequence- and structure-based alignment that accounts for structure conservation in loop regions. Secondly, by merging multiple template structures into one comparative model, the best possible template for every region of a target can be used expanding the conformational space sampled in a meaningful way. This optimization allows for accurate modeling of receptors using templates as low as 20% sequence identity, which accounts for nearly the entire druggable space of GPCRs. A model database of all non-odorant GPCRs is made available at www.rosettagpcr.org. Additionally, all protocols are made available with insights into modifications that may improve accuracy at new targets.

Structural Model of Ghrelin Bound to its G Protein-Coupled Receptor

The peptide ghrelin targets the growth hormone secretagogue receptor 1a (GHSR) to signal changes in cell metabolism and is a sought-after therapeutic target, although no structure is known to date. To investigate the structural basis of ghrelin binding to GHSR, we used solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, site-directed mutagenesis, and Rosetta modeling. The use of saturation transfer difference NMR identified key residues in the peptide for receptor binding beyond the known motif. This information combined with assignment of the secondary structure of ghrelin in its receptor-bound state was incorporated into Rosetta using an approach that accounts for flexible binding partners. The NMR data and models revealed an extended binding surface that was confirmed via mutagenesis. Our results agree with a growing evidence of peptides interacting via two sites at G protein-coupled receptors.

α2A- and α2C-Adrenoceptors as Potential Targets for Dopamine and Dopamine Receptor Ligands

The poor norepinephrine innervation and high density of Gi/o-coupled α_2A- and α_2C-adrenoceptors in the striatum and the dense striatal dopamine innervation have prompted the possibility that dopamine could be an effective adrenoceptor ligand. Nevertheless, the reported adrenoceptor agonistic properties of dopamine are still inconclusive. In this study, we analyzed the binding of norepinephrine, dopamine, and several compounds reported as selective dopamine D₂-like receptor ligands, such as the D₃ receptor agonist 7-OH-PIPAT and the D₄ receptor agonist RO-105824, to α₂-adrenoceptors in cortical and striatal tissue, which express α_2A-adrenoceptors and both α_2A- and α_2C-adrenoceptors, respectively. The affinity of dopamine for α₂-adrenoceptors was found to be similar to that for D₁-like and D₂-like receptors. Moreover, the exogenous dopamine receptor ligands also showed high affinity for α_2A- and α_2C-adrenoceptors. Their ability to activate Gi/o proteins through α_2A- and α_2C-adrenoceptors was also analyzed in transfected cells with bioluminescent resonance energy transfer techniques. The relative ligand potencies and efficacies were dependent on the Gi/o protein subtype. Furthermore, dopamine binding to α₂-adrenoceptors was functional, inducing changes in dynamic mass redistribution, adenylyl cyclase activity, and ERK1/2 phosphorylation. Binding events were further studied with computer modeling of ligand docking. Docking of dopamine at α_2A- and α_2C-adrenoceptors was nearly identical to its binding to the crystallized D₃ receptor. Therefore, we provide conclusive evidence that α_2A- and α_2C-adrenoceptors are functional receptors for norepinephrine, dopamine, and other previously assumed selective D₂-like receptor ligands, which calls for revisiting previous studies with those ligands.

Erythropoietic protoporphyria with hepatic cirrhosis

Cholestatic jaundice and rapidly deteriorating hepatic function developed in a 19-year-old man with a lifelong history of photosensitivity. Laboratory studies revealed the characteristic increased erythrocyte and fecal protoporphyrin levels of erythropoietic protoporphyria. Progressive hepatic failure was treated by orthotopic liver transplantation six months after the first clinical indication of hepatic dysfunction. Characteristic light microscopic, fluorescence microscopic, and electron microscopic findings of erythropoietic protoporphyria were present in skin and liver. Four weeks after liver transplantation, the patient died of disseminated candidiasis. At autopsy, the donor liver had no microscopic evidence of protoporphyrin accumulation, although tissue protoporphyrin levels were mildly elevated.