Paying for blood donations: still a risk?

It is presently disputed whether studies indicating a higher risk of infectious diseases among paid blood donors are lessons of the past, or still hold relevance. Comparative studies published between 1968 and 2001 were assessed for a possible trend of change in the relative risk for infectious disease markers between paid and unpaid blood or plasma donors. Studies reporting that paid donors had lower risk were found, but most studies, including recent ones, continued to report that paid donors have higher rates of infectious disease markers than unpaid donors. By log-linear regression analysis of the relative risk estimates for infectious disease markers among paid and unpaid donors from 28 published data sets, evidence was not found to indicate that the difference in risk for infectious disease markers between paid donors and unpaid donors had diminished over time (P = 0.128, not significant). Paid donors are still more likely than unpaid donors to donate blood in the period during which infectious donations escape detection by blood-screening tests (the "window-period"). Therefore, paid donations have a higher risk that labile blood components (such as red blood cells and platelets) are infected. Additional safety measures for handling plasma donations, and the preparation, purification and viral-inactivation steps employed for the production of plasma derivatives, may render the difference in infectious disease marker rates in donors irrelevant for plasma products. However, not all viruses are inactivated and paid donors were repeatedly found to have higher frequencies of markers for emerging agents. In a quality system, critical steps of the process should be addressed, and selection of the donor population is one of the first steps in this process. It is advised that blood establishments present yearly reports (with complete and raw data) to authorities on the incidence and prevalence of infectious disease markers among their donors as an ongoing surveillance on the "quality" of their donor populations. Paid blood or plasma donors still have higher rates for infectious disease markers than unpaid donors.

Validation of the NucliSens Extractor in combination with the hepatitis C virus Cobas Amplicor 2.0 assay in four laboratories in the Netherlands utilizing nucleic acid amplification technology for blood screening

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Since July 1 1999, four laboratories in the Netherlands have been routinely screening plasma minipools for the release of labile blood components utilizing hepatitis C virus nucleic acid amplification technology (HCV NAT). This report describes the performance evaluation of the HCV NAT method and the quality control results obtained during 6 months of routine screening.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plasma minipools of 48 donations were prepared on a Tecan Genesis robot. HCV RNA was isolated from 2 ml of plasma by using the NucliSens Extractor and amplified and detected with the Cobas HCV Amplicor 2.0 test system. For validation of the test system the laboratories used viral quality control (VQC) reagents of CLB.

RESULTS

Initial robustness experiments demonstrated consistent detection of PeliSpy HCV RNA samples of 140 genome equivalents/ml (geq/ml) in each station of the installed Nuclisens Extractors. Further 'stress' tests with a highly viraemic sample of approximately 5 x 10(6) geq/ml did not contaminate negative samples processed on all Extractor stations in subsequent runs. In the validation period prior to July 1999, 1021 pools were tested with the following performance characteristics: 0.1%, initially false reactive; 0.89%, failure of internal control detection; 0.97%, no eluate generated by the Extractor; and 100% reactivity of the PeliSpy 140 geq/ml control in 176 Extractor runs and a 98% reactivity rate of the PeliSpy 38 geq/ml control in 102 test runs. By testing the PeliCheck HCV RNA genotype 1 dilution panels 49 times, an overall 95% detection limit of 30 geq/ml ( approximately 8 IU/ml) and a 50% detection limit of 5 geq/ml was found by the four laboratories. In the first 6 months of routine screening, the minimum requirement for invalid results (2%) was exceeded with some batches of silica and NucliSens Extractor cartridges. From November 1999 to February 2000, the manufacturer (Organon Teknika) improved the protocol for silica absorption of the Nuclisens Extractor -- the cartridge design as well as the software of the Extractor. During the next 6 months of observation in 2000, the percentages of false initial reactives and invalids were 0.05% and 1.4%, respectively, in 8962 pools tested. Of these invalid results, 0.74% and 0.66% were caused by Extractor failure and negative internal control signals, respectively. The PeliSpy HCV RNA 'stop or go' run control of 140 geq/ml was 100% reactive, but invalid in 16/1375 (1.2%) of cases. The PeliSpy run control of 38 geq/ml for monitoring sensitivity of reagent batches was reactive in 95% of 123 samples tested.

CONCLUSIONS

Each of the four HCV NAT laboratories in the Netherlands have achieved similar detection limits that are well below the sensitivity requirements of the regulatory bodies. After improvement of the NucliSens Extractor procedure, the robustness of the test system has proved to be acceptable for routine screening and timely release of all labile blood components.

A simple strategy to look back on posttransfusion hepatitis B in a multitransfused patient

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

In January 1996, a case of hepatitis B virus (HBV) seroconversion in a multitransfused patient was reported to the blood bank From March through October 1995, the patient had received 23 units of red cells and 30 units of pooled platelet concentrates, encompassing an exposure to a total of 200 whole blood donations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In order to trace hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative but HBV-infectious blood donation(s), we tested samples of the donors obtained > or = 3 months after the implicated donations for anti-HBc (Corezyme EIA, Abbott). From 172/200 donors, archived samples of subsequent donations were available for this purpose. The remaining 28 donors were reinvited to the blood bank to obtain an additional blood sample for anti-HBc testing.

RESULTS

1/200 follow-up donor samples was anti-HBc-positive. Retrospective testing of the implicated HBsAg-negative blood donation of this donor revealed anti-HBc-negative and HBV-DNA-positive results. The patient was transfused with the platelets of the HBV-infectious donation. On looking back, the other blood products prepared from this HBV-infectious donation caused posttransfusion HBV infection (PT-HBV) in 2 additional patients.

CONCLUSION

Anti-HBc testing on mainly archived follow-up samples of 200 donors implicated in PT-HBV was a rapid, simple cost-effective and donor-friendly method to identify an infectious but HBsAg-negative, anti-HBc-negative and HBV-DNA PCR-positive blood donation. Routine anti-HBc screening would not have prevented this HBV transmission.

Evaluation of automated nucleic acid extraction devices for application in HCV NAT

BACKGROUND

To further improve the safety of the blood supply, various national blood transfusion organizations presently use or are in the process of implementing routine HCV NAT in minipools. According to the Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products (CPMP) of the European Union, the HCV NAT detection limit of the assay should be 100 IU per mL (270 geq/mL) for testing initial plasma pools. Paul Ehrlich Institute (PEI) regulations stipulate that 5000 IU per mL (13,500 geq/mL) must be detected to calculate the amount contributed by individual donations composing the minipool. The sensitivity for HCV RNA extraction achieved by three commercially available laboratory kits was compared.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Nucleic acids from 1-in-3 serial dilutions of an HCV RNA run control (Pelispy, CLB) were extracted with three kits (Cobas Amplicor, Roche Diagnostic Systems; BioRobot 9604, Qiagen; and NucliSens Extractor, Organon Teknika). HCV PCR of all extracts was performed using a second-generation Cobas Amplicor HCV test and the Cobas Amplicor analyzer.

RESULTS

The manual Cobas Amplicor, the BioRobot 9604, and the NucliSens Extractor setups allow a 95-percent HCV RNA detection limit of 129, 82, and 12 geq per mL, respectively. The maximal pool size for the manual Cobas Amplicor, the BioRobot 9604, and the NucliSens Extractor kits that would still meet the PEI criteria for HCV NAT in minipools was calculated at 104, 164, and 1125 donations, respectively.

CONCLUSION

All three HCV NAT kits evaluated meet the criteria set by CPMP and PEI. The highest sensitivity for HCV NAT screening can be achieved with the high-volume NucliSens Extractor method in combination with the Cobas Amplicor HCV v2.0 test on the Cobas Amplicor analyzer.

[Leukodepletion of blood products: a requirement for improvement of quality and safety]

The presence of leukocytes in blood products has no beneficial effect on the recipient, except in special situations such as for patients being prepared to receive an organ transplantation. On the other hand the leukocytes have a number of untoward side effects such as HLA immunisation, non haemolytic febrile transfusion reactions, virus transmission and postoperative infections. In response to a request of the Minister of Health, Welfare and Sports, the Health Council of the Netherlands prepared a recommendation on the need of routine leukodepletion by filtration of blood. Although the introduction of leukodepletion of blood products is favoured, it is emphasized that only data from selected patient groups are available while the costs of leukodepletion are considerable. Therefore, an evaluation of the benefits and cost effectiveness of blood filtration is recommended. It is argued that leukodepletion, already introduced in a number of countries, is now considered to be 'state of the art'. Furthermore product liability, public opinion about blood safety and the precaution duty of manufacturers should be taken into account.

Hepatitis C virus and blood transfusion: past and present risks

The risk of HCV transmission by blood and blood products has been greatly reduced since the early 1980's. Selection of non-remunerated donors, donor selection to prevent HIV transmission, initial surrogate testing in some regions, and introduction of anti-HCV testing have all contributed to this. ALT surrogate testing has become obsolete since the introduction of anti-HCV testing. The residual risk of HCV transmission due to donations in the anti-HCV window period at present is about 1 in 100 000 transfusions of cellular products, and transmission of HCV by plasma products treated with modern inactivation methods such as solvent-detergent treatment, has not been reported. Hemovigilance programmes, which are presently being installed, will provide more data on the safety of blood transfusion. Introduction of HCV nucleic amplification technology (NAT) as a quality control of manufacturing pools for plasma products or as a form of blood donor screening by minipools is anticipated in many European countries for the coming year. Given industrial developments, NAT testing of individual blood donations may become available within the next 2 years. HCV NAT testing will further annihilate the residual risk, and the cost-effectiveness will become relatively low in comparison with other public health measures.

[Optimal versus maximal safety of the blood transfusion chain in The Netherlands; results of a conference. College for Blood Transfusion of the Dutch Red Cross]

An invitational conference was held on September 11, 1996 by the Medical Advisory Commission to the Blood Transfusion Council of the Netherlands Red Cross, addressing the issues of 'maximal' versus 'optimal' safety measures for the blood supply. Invited were blood transfusion specialists, clinicians, representatives of patient interest groups, the Ministry and Inspectorate of Health and members of parliament. Transfusion experts and clinicians were found to advocate an optimal course, following strategies of evidence-based medicine, cost-benefit analyses and medical technology assessment. Patient groups depending on blood products, such as haemophilia patients would rather opt for maximal safety. Insurance companies would choose likewise, to exclude any risk if possible. Health care juridical advisers would advise to choose for optimal safety, but to reserve funds covering the differences with 'maximal safety' in case of litigation. Politicians and the general public would sooner choose for maximal rather than optimal security. The overall impression persists that however small the statistical risk may be, in the eyes of many it is unacceptable. This view is very stubborn.

New hepatitis B virus mutant form in a blood donor that is undetectable in several hepatitis B surface antigen screening assays

BACKGROUND

Envelope mutant forms of hepatitis B virus (HBV), impairing HBV antibody recognition, have been reported with mutations in single or multiple sites of the hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) group-specific "a" determinant. Blood donors infected with such an HBsAg mutant form of HBV may escape detection by HBsAg screening assays and therefore may affect the safety of the blood supply.

CASE REPORT

A repeat blood donor became HBsAg-reactive in an enzyme immunoassay. Confirmatory testing yielded negative results for HBsAg in a radioimmunoassay and in four enzyme immunoassays used in blood donor screening. The specificity of the HBsAg reactivity in the first enzyme immunoassay was confirmed by HBsAg neutralization with antibody to HBsAg. Additional HBV confirmatory test results were positive for antibody to hepatitis B core antigen and antibody to hepatitis B e antigen; negative for antibody to HBsAg and for hepatitis B e antigen; and positive for HBV DNA. DNA sequence analysis of the "a" determinant region of HBsAg revealed amino acid substitutions from Q (Gln) to R (Arg) at codon 129 and from M (Met) to T (Thr) at codon 133.

CONCLUSION

This case illustrates the presence of HBsAg mutant forms of HBV in a West European blood donor population that were undetected by several HBsAg screening assays. Adaptation of HBsAg screening is indicated to overcome deficiencies in sensitivity in detecting HBsAg mutant forms of HBV. Screening for antibody to hepatitis B core antigen or HBV DNA may also detect blood donors infected with HBsAg mutant forms of HBV

[Infection with T-lymphotropic virus in Dutch blood donors, 1993-1996]

Infection with human T-lymphotrophic virus (HTLV) type 1 causes a neurological disorder or leukaemia in a minority of infected persons. Since January 1993 the Dutch blood banks screen each donation for presence of HTLV-1 infection. Approximately 4,000,000 donations from 700,000 donors have been tested. The numbers of confirmed HTLV-1 positive donors were: 1993: 15; 1994: 6; 1995: 8; 1996: 3. In 1995 one case of HTLV-2 infection was detected as well. In 26/32 (81%) of the HTLV-1 positive cases either the donor or his/her partner originated from HTLV-1 endemic areas. The introduction of HTLV screening prevents the silent spread of HTLV via blood transfusion.

Performance of three generations of anti-hepatitis C virus enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays in donors and patients

BACKGROUND

Prevention of posttransfusion non-A,non-B hepatitis in recipients of blood components improved considerably with the introduction of the second-generation of hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody tests. In 1993, third-generation HCV antibody assays were introduced in Europe.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The performance of three generations of anti-HCV enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (ELISA-1, -2, -3) was compared in routine blood donor screening (99,394 donations were tested with ELISA-1, 167,999 donations with ELISA-2, and 262,090 donations with ELISA-3) and in serial samples from nine patients with documented acute posttransfusion HCV infection.

RESULTS

Eight (0.01%) repeat donors, previously negative in ELISA-1, were found positive in ELISA-2 and were confirmed as positive in second-generation recombinant immunoblot assay and/or cDNA polymerase chain reaction. In the donor population, no difference in the sensitivity of ELISA-2 and -3 was observed. The specificity of the three generations of ELISAs was comparable (99.8, 99.7, and 99.7%). In seroconversion samples, ELISA-2 and -3 detected HCV antibodies at the same time in seven patients, but in two patients, ELISA-3 found HCV antibodies, respectively, 63 and 77 days earlier than ELISA-2 did. In the seroconversion samples, ELISA-2 and -3 were significantly more sensitive than second- and third-generation recombinant immunoblot assays.

CONCLUSION

ELISA-3 did not detect more HCV-infected individuals in a donor population that previously tested negative in ELISA-2, but it did detect HCV antibodies earlier in some patients with acute HCV infection. ELISA-2 and -3 were significantly more sensitive than second- and third-generation recombinant immunoblot assays.

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibodies detected by new assays that are enhanced for HIV-1 subtype O

BACKGROUND

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) subtype O infections are not reliably detected by commonly used anti-HIV-1/2 screening assays. Therefore, anti-HIV-1/2 assays have been modified to increase their sensitivity in detecting antibodies to HIV-1 subtype O.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Two new anti-HIV-1/2 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) (Abbott Plus and Ortho Enhanced) were compared with a currently used anti-HIV-1/2 ELISA (Abbott Recombinant) in various serum panels: 91 Western blot-confirmed anti-HIV-1-positive samples, 20 samples from Western blot-confirmed HIV-1-infected patients in log3 serial dilutions, and 1463 samples from consecutive, volunteer, nonremunerated blood donors.

RESULTS

Among 91 anti-HIV-1 Western blot-positive samples, 2 (2.2%) were missed by the Abbott Recombinant ELISA, but all 91 were detected by the Abbott Plus and Ortho Enhanced ELISAs. In contrast, two discrepant samples were found to react in viral lysate-based assays. In serial dilutions, Ortho Enhanced ELISA was significantly less sensitive than the Abbott Recombinant and Abbott Plus ELISAs, with the latter two being of comparable sensitivity. The specificities of Abbott Recombinant, Abbott Plus, and Ortho Enhanced ELISAs in 1463 blood donors were 100, 99.93, and 99.86 percent, respectively. Routine testing of 29,102 donations with the enhanced Abbott Plus ELISA revealed a specificity of 99.93 percent.

CONCLUSION

Two Western blot-confirmed anti-HIV-1-positive samples were missed by the Abbott Recombinant ELISA but detected by the Abbott Plus and Ortho Enhanced ELISAs. The analytic sensitivity of the Ortho Enhanced ELISA was inferior to that of both Abbott ELISAs. The specificities of the Abbott Recombinant, Abbott Plus, and Ortho Enhanced ELISAs were comparable.

Evaluation of a new HTLV-I/II polymerase chain reaction

AIM

Evaluation of a qualitative HTLV-I/II DNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for the detection of HTLV-I/II DNA (Roche Diagnostic Systems, Branchburg, N.J., USA) in various panels.

METHODS

The panels consisted of fresh EDTA blood samples from blood donors who were anti-HTLV-I/II ELISA repeatably reactive: 53 were Western blot (WB) positive, 228 were WB indeterminate and 15 were WB negative. Elevent ELISA-negative blood donors were used as negative controls. Furthermore, specimens from 1 HTLV-II-infected intravenous drug user and from 1 HTLV-II-infected blood donor were included in the panel. Peripheral blood lymphocytes were prepared by red blood cell lysis with the Roche washing solution and stored at < -23 degrees C until processing. Amplification products were analyzed with the HTLV-I/II detection kit.

RESULTS

All 53 anti-HTLV-I/II ELISA- and WB-positive samples and both HTLV-II-positive samples tested positively by PCR. All 228 anti-HTLV-I/II ELISA-positive and WB-indeterminate, all 15 ELISA-positive and WB-negative and all II ELISA-negative control samples tested negative by PCR.

CONCLUSION

The Roche Amplicor HTLV-I/II test is a simple test, suitable for the confirmation of HTLV-I and-II infection in individuals with indeterminate or positive WB patterns.

Look-back of anti-HCV ELISA-positive, HCV-RNA PCR-negative donors and recipients of their blood products

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To establish the infectivity of anti-HCV ELISA-positive, but cDNA-PCR-negative blood components transfused before the introduction of routine anti-HCV blood donor screening, we enrolled recipients of such blood products in a look-back programme.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The blood components were donated by (A) RIBA-2-indeterminate and cDNA-PCR-negative donors, and (B) RIBA-2 and cDNA-PCR-negative donors. The look-back comprised 214 blood products from group A donors and 278 from group B.

RESULTS

Of 211 recipients of group A components, 66 (31.3%) were available for testing. All other recipients could not be traced, had died, or refused collaboration. Of these 66, 3 patients had independent risk factors for HCV infection and were excluded. All remaining 63 recipients were anti-HCV ELISA-negative. Of 274 recipients of group B components, 84 (30.7%) were available for testing. All others could not be traced, had died, or refused collaboration. Of these 84, six patients had an independent risk factor for HCV infection and were excluded. All remaining 78 recipients were anti-HCV ELISA-negative. None of the recipients of blood products from previous donations of anti-HCV ELISA-positive, cDNA-PCR-negative, and RIBA-2-indeterminate or negative donors were HCV-infected.

CONCLUSIONS

Donors and patients with such reactivities in anti-HCV ELISA, RIBA-2, and cDNA-PCR can be assured that they are not infected with HCV. The donors involved can re-enter the donor pool, provided that future donations are anti-HCV ELISA-negative.

Sensitivity and specificity of four assays to detect human T-lymphotropic virus type I or type I/II antibodies

BACKGROUND

Assays that detect human T-lymphotropic virus type I and type II antibody (HTLV-I/II) are widely used in the routine screening of blood donors.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Four commercially available anti-HTLV-I (Fujirebio and Organon Teknika) or -HTLV-I/II assays (Murex and Ortho) were evaluated in various serum panels: A) HTLV-I-positive specimens (n = 41), confirmed by Western blot and polymerase chain reaction; B) a commercially available anti-HTLV-I/II panel; C) serial dilutions of sera from HTLV-I-positive individuals (n = 30), confirmed by immunofluorescence assay and Western blot: D) serial dilutions of HTLV-II-positive blood donors (n = 20), confirmed by Western blot and polymerase chain reaction, and E) sera from first-time blood donors (n = 1055).

RESULTS

All four assays elicited reactions in all 82 HTLV-I-positive samples in Panels A, B, and C. Of 32 HTLV-II-positive specimens in Panels B and D, 31 (96.9%) reacted in the Organon Teknika assay and all 32 reacted in the remaining tests. Probit analysis of test results in Panels C and D indicated that the Fujirebio test was the most sensitive assay, followed by Organon Teknika, Ortho, and Murex. The specificities of Fujirebio, Murex, Organon Teknika, and Ortho tests in 1055 first-time blood donors were 99.9, 100, 99.6, and 99.9 percent, respectively.

CONCLUSION

All four studied assays for detecting HTLV-I or HTLV-I/II antibodies are appropriate as screening tests.

Reliability of the third-generation recombinant immunoblot assay for hepatitis C virus

BACKGROUND

In a confirmatory laboratory, the second-generation recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA-2) was replaced by the third-generation RIBA (RIBA-3) in March 1993. The aim of this validation study was to compare the sensitivity and specificity of RIBA-2 and RIBA-3 in a routine setting, by using a validated hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA polymerase chain reaction to establish plasma viremia.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

RIBA-2 testing was performed (March 1991-March 1993) in 593 HCV RNA-positive and 1498 HCV RNA-negative subjects. RIBA-3 testing was performed (March 1993-May 1994) in 220 HCV RNA-positive and 530 HCV RNA-negative subjects. All samples reacted for anti-HCV in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

In HCV RNA-positive individuals, the sensitivity of RIBA-3 was significantly higher than that of RIBA-2 (99.5% vs. 93.3%, p = 0.0005). This was not caused by inclusion of the NS5 antigen, but by a higher sensitivity of the antigens c33 and c100 (RIBA-2: 94.3% and 62.6%; RIBA-3: 99.5% and 88.6%). Replacement of the c22 and c100 recombinant proteins by synthetic peptides significantly reduced nonspecific reactivity against these antigens (p < 0.0001). Unfortunately, increased nonspecific reactivity against the modified c33 antigen and the new NS5 antigen canceled out this effect. Two-band reactivity occurred more often in nonviremic persons than in viremic persons (32.7% vs. 8.2%, p < 0.0001). Risk factors for HCV infection were less frequently observed in 11 blood donors with two-band reactivity than in 6 blood donors with other positive RIBA-3 patterns (18% vs. 83%, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

The higher sensitivity of RIBA-3 significantly reduced the number of indeterminate test results in HCV RNA-positive persons. Confirmatory laboratories must be aware of the frequent occurrence of nonspecific, isolated reactivity and even nonspecific, two-band reactivity in anti-HCV enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay-reactive blood donors.

Comparison of two anti-hepatitis C virus enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays

BACKGROUND

Third-generation anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) are now implemented in most laboratories in Europe, but have not yet been fully implemented in the United States.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Two ELISAs (Ortho 3.0 and Ortho 2.0, Ortho Diagnostics, Raritan, NJ) were compared by tests on various serum panels: A) blood donor samples (n = 530) that tested positive in first- or second-generation anti-HCV ELISA; B) samples from persons with chronic non-A, non-B hepatitis (n = 185); C) samples from multiply transfused patients (n = 79); D) samples from patients on hemodialysis (n = 473); and E) samples from Dutch random blood donors (n = 2153).

RESULTS

In panels A, B, and C, 247 (100%) of 247 polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-positive and 278 (100%) of 278 second-generation recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA-2)-positive specimens were detected by Ortho 2.0 and 3.0 (sensitivity, 100%). In the sera of panel D, used to represent a group of patients with a high risk for HCV, no additional positives were found by Ortho 3.0. In panel E, of 2153 blood donor samples, 2 (0.1%) were positive in Ortho 2.0 and 8 (0.4%) in Ortho 3.0. Two samples that were positive in both Ortho 2.0 and 3.0 were also positive in RIBA-2; one was positive on PCR. From the 6 remaining Ortho 3.0-positive (Ortho 2.0-negative) samples, 1 was positive in RIBA-2 (isolated anti-c100) and 3 were positive in third-generation RIBA (1/3 isolated anti-c100, 2/3 isolated NS5). All 6 samples were PCR negative. In first-time donors, no difference in specificity was found.

CONCLUSION

The sensitivity and specificity of the Ortho 3.0 ELISA are comparable to those of the Ortho 2.0 ELISA.

Sensitivity and specificity of three third-generation anti-hepatitis C virus ELISAs

Three commercially available 3rd-generation anti-HCV ELISAs (Abbott, Murex and Ortho) were evaluated in various serum panels: (A) blood donor samples (n = 403) with 1st- or 2nd-generation anti-HCV ELISA (various manufacturers) positive test results; (B) non-A, non-B hepatitis patients (n = 212); (C) multitransfused patients (n = 253); (D) serial dilutions of HCV confirmed (RIBA and PCR) positive blood donors (n = 24), and (E) first-time blood donors (n = 1,055). All samples of panels A, B and C were tested in PCR and RIBA-2. In panels A, B and C, 398 samples were HCV PCR positive: all were detected by Abbott and Ortho, and 397 (99.7%) by Murex. The sample missed by the Murex ELISA showed an isolated anti-C33c reactivity in RIBA-2. In panels A-C, 442 samples were RIBA-2 positive and all were detected by the 3 tests. With Probit analysis on results of panel D, no significant difference in sensitivity was observed between the 3 evaluated ELISAs. Specificities of Abbott, Murex and Ortho in 1,055 blood donors were 99.7, 99.3 and 99.9%, respectively (NS, chi 2). We conclude that the sensitivity and specificity of the 3 ELISAs are comparable although the C33c antigen in the Murex VK47 test should be improved.

Comparison of two anti-hepatitis C virus enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays: Wellcozyme VK45 and Ortho 2.0

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to compare 2 anti-HCV ELISA tests with respect to sensitivity and specificity in detecting Hepatitis C antigen.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A 3rd-generation anti-HCV ELISA (Wellcozyme anti-HCV VK45) was compared with a 2nd-generation anti-HCV ELISA (Ortho HCV 2.0) in various serum panels: A) anti-HCV ELISA-positive samples of blood donations (n = 536), B) non-A, non-B hepatitis patients (n = 188), C) multi-transfused patients (n = 79), D) hemodialysis patients (n = 473), and E) random blood donors (n = 1,080).

RESULTS

Of 248 cDNA polymerase chain reaction (cDNA-PCR) positive samples in panels A, B, and C, ELISA-VK45 detected 247 (99.6%) and Ortho-2 248 (100%). The cDNA-PCR-positive sample missed by ELISA-VK45 showed isolated anti-C33c reactivity in a 2nd-generation recombinant immunoblot (RIBA-2). Of 281 RIBA-2-positive samples, ELISA-VK45 detected 274 (97.5%) and Ortho-2 279 (99.3%). ELISA-VK45-negative, RIBA-2-positive samples showed combined anti-C100/5-1-1 reactivity in RIBA-2 in 6/7 cases and anti-C22 and C33c reactivity in one. Ortho-2-negative, RIBA-2-positive samples showed combined anti-C100/5-1-1 reactivity in RIBA-2 in 2/2 cases. The specificities of ELISA-VK45 and Ortho-2 were not significantly different in 1,080 blood donors.

CONCLUSION

It is concluded that the ELISA-VK45 lacks sensitivity because a cDNA-PCR-confirmed positive sample was missed in the assay. The specificity of both ELISAs was comparable.

Evaluation of a combined lysate/recombinant antigen anti-HTLV-I/II ELISA in high and low endemic areas of HTLV-I/II infection

The Wellcozyme HTLV-I/II ELISA (Murex Diagnostics) was evaluated in 7800 samples of various serum panels. Repeat activity was found by Wellcozyme in (A) 1/2181 (0.05%) Dutch blood donors, (B) 44/3036 (1.4%) Curaçao (Caribbean area) blood donors, (C) 46/2533 (1.8%) individuals of different Ethiopian population subsets, (D) 30/30 (100%) confirmed anti-HTLV-I positive samples and (E) 20/20 (100%) HTLV-II PCR-positive samples. All 91 Wellcozyme-positive samples were tested for confirmation by Western blot (WB, Diagnostic Biotechnology). Among Wellcozyme HTLV-I/II ELISA-positive individuals, HTLV-I/II WB positivity was found in 0/1 Dutch blood donors, 40/44 (88.9%) Curaçao blood donors and 20/46 (43.5%) Ethiopian individuals. HTLV-I positivity was found in 40 (1.3%) WB-positive Curaçao blood donors and in 9 (0.35%) Ethiopian individuals. HTLV-II positivity was found in 11 (0.43%) WB-positive Ethiopian individuals. The Wellcozyme HTLV-I/II ELISA had a specificity of 99.95% in Dutch blood donors and a sensitivity of 100% on confirmed HTLV-I- and HTLV-II-positive samples. In Ethiopia 55% of the HTLV-I/II WB-positive individuals were exclusively HTLV-II positive, whereas in Curaçao no HTLV-II infections were found.

Hepatitis C infection and viremia in Dutch hemophilia patients

Serum samples from 316 patients visiting the Dutch National Hemophilia Center were collected from 1979 to 1993 and stored at -30 degrees C. Patients were placed into three different groups: 1) patients ever treated with large pool non-hepatitis C virus (HCV)-safe concentrate (n = 179); 2) patients treated with cryoprecipitate (n = 125); and 3) patients treated exclusively with HCV-save concentrate (n = 12). In order to examine the prevalence of HCV infection in the different treatment groups serum samples were tested retrospectively for anti-HCV antibody using second generation enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA-2). Significant differences in the prevalence of HCV infection were found between these 3 groups (group 1: 99%, group 2: 66%, group 3: 0%). The safety of currently administered clotting products is demonstrated in 57 patients who remained without HCV markers between 1989 and 1993. To examine the natural course of HCV infection fresh-frozen plasma samples were obtained recently from a subgroup of 277 hemophilia patients for HCV-RNA detection by a well-validated cDNA-PCR assay. In contrast to other reports, no evidence was found for seronegative HCV carriers. None of 52 patients without anti-HCV had detectable HCV-RNA. Of 225 patients with anti-HCV, 182 (81%) were HCV-RNA positive. None of 39 anti-HCV positive patients with a negative HCV-RNA reaction had serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels above 50 U/l, whereas 44% of HCV-RNA positive patients had persistently elevated ATL levels above 50 U/l.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Look-back study of infectivity of anti-HCV ELISA-positive blood components

The infectivity of blood components from donors who were later found to be anti-HCV ELISA-positive was investigated in recipients who were enrolled in a look-back programme. Recipients received ELISA-positive blood components from donors who were PCR-positive and/or RIBA-2-positive (n = 22, group A) or PCR-negative and indeterminate or negative on RIBA-2 (n = 105, group B). 26 of 32 (81%) recipients of group A donors and none of 140 of group B were HCV-infected. All stored serum samples of previous donations (n = 172) of group A donors were anti-HCV-positive in RIBA-3, indicating a chronic carrier state of HCV in these donors.

Transmission of hepatitis C virus by anti-HCV-negative blood transfusion. Case report

Acute posttransfusion hepatitis C was reported in a recipient of 3 units of red cells. The recipient became acutely icteric 6 weeks after transfusion, and HCV infection was diagnosed. Stored serum samples of the 3 implicated donations, which were negative with ELISA-2, were retested by PCR and 3rd-generation antibody tests. One implicated donation was PCR positive, but anti-HCV negative. Both other donations were negative in all tests. The donor was recalled to the Blood Bank 13 weeks after the implicated donation and was found to be ELISA-3 plus RIBA-3 positive. Eight months after the implicated donation, the donor is still PCR and RIBA-3 positive, whereas the recipient became PCR negative but remained anti-HCV RIBA-3 positive. The case shows that blood products from donors collected during the open window period of an HCV infection can transmit HCV to recipients.

E2 and NS5: new antigens for detection of hepatitis C virus antibodies

The value of two new hepatitis C virus (HCV) antigens for detection of HCV antibodies was studied. These two recombinant antigens were derived from the nonstructural-5 (NS5) and envelope-2 (E2) region of the HCV genome. In a panel of 33 HCV-RNA positive samples with indeterminate Riba-2 confirmatory test results, 29 samples (88%) showed additional antibody reactivity against E2 and 12 samples (36%) showed additional reactivity against NS5. Among 39 HCV-RNA negative, Riba-2 indeterminate donor samples, no additional E2 or NS5 reactivity was found in 34 samples (87%); while 5 samples (13%) showed additional reactivity against NS5 and/or E2. E2 reactivity thus resolved the majority of hitherto indeterminate samples. In serial samples from nine posttransfusion hepatitis C patients, NS5 and E2 antibodies did not appear earlier than classical HCV antibodies. However, E2 antibodies eventually appeared in all nine patients. The recombinant E2 might be a candidate antigen for future HCV antibody assays.

Hepatitis C virus infection from blood and blood products

The addition of second-generation HCV epitopes in antibody detection assays has increased the sensitivity and specificity of blood donor testing, to prevent post-transfusion hepatitis non-A, non-B (PTH-NANB), later characterized as Hepatitis C. However, it is not clear whether all HCV infectious donors are detected by second-generation anti-HCV testing. Prospective studies on PTH-NANB were left with some unresolved cases. The use of second-generation anti-HCV assays in blood banks presented a problem with a relatively large number of indeterminate reactivities in supplemental assay such as RIBA-2. These indeterminate reactivities may be solved by the use of polymerase chain reaction (PCR). PCR is more and more used as an extra confirmatory assay to resolve RIBA indeterminate results on blood donors. However, a European study on the proficiency of HCV PCR in different countries revealed that only a minority of the reference laboratories perform this test faultless. Lately, third-generation RIBA was developed, which was originally designed to resolve RIBA-2 indeterminate cases. RIBA-3 was shown to be more sensitive and specific in early HCV infection and blood donors than RIBA-2. Third-generation anti-HCV testing will become standard practice. Some questions, however, remain unanswered. Do we miss any rare HCV infectious donors, of other genotypes, with third-generation assays, based only on the type 1 sequence of HCV? Can we improve HCV detection in the early phase of infection? What is the role of sporadic HCV transmission? How can we standardize HCV nucleic acid detection methods?

Recombinant immunoblot assay reaction patterns and hepatitis C virus RNA in blood donors and non-A, non-B hepatitis patients

To establish the value of the second-generation recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA-2) and cDNA polymerase chain reaction (cDNA PCR) for confirmation of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, anti-HCV reaction patterns and the presence of HCV RNA were examined in 610 blood donors and 255 non-A, non-B hepatitis patients who were positive or indeterminate in RIBA-2. Of RIBA-2-positive donors (n = 191) and patients (n = 224), 75.4 and 89.7 percent, respectively, were HCV RNA positive. The most frequently observed anti-HCV recognition patterns in HCV RNA-positive donors and patients were c22, c33c, and c100 and/or 5-1-1 (67.3%, 57.7%) and c22, c33c (24.8%, 29.3%). Among subjects with a RIBA-2-indeterminate result, HCV RNA was detected more often in patients (n = 31) than in donors (n = 419): 67.7 and 2.1 percent, respectively. In viremic persons with single-band reactivity in RIBA-2, this reactivity was always directed against either c22 or c33c. HCV RNA was detected by cDNA PCR in none of 162 persons with only anti-c100 and/or anti-5-1-1 reactivity. Therefore, RIBA-2 reactivity against c100 in combination with 5-1-1 should not be considered positive but indeterminate. In RIBA-2-indeterminate persons, HCV RNA detection is necessary for reliable confirmation of HCV infection.

Sexual transmission of hepatitis C virus

We tested 50 heterosexual partners of hepatitis C viraemic (HCV) individuals, using second generation HCV antibody assays and a validated polymerase chain reaction assay. In none of them were HCV antibodies or HCV-RNA detected. The median duration of the sexual relationship was 13 years. This study, with the most sensitive techniques for detection of HCV, indicates that the risk of sexual transmission of HCV is absent or very low.

Variability of IgM response in hepatitis C virus infection

The IgM and IgG antibody response to various hepatitis C virus (HCV) antigens was studied in 8 patients who acquired posttransfusion HCV infection. IgM anti-HCV was detectable in only 4 of these patients, coincident with (1 patient) or later than (3 patients) the IgG anti-HCV response. Seven patients had initially decreasing IgG anti-HCV titres, indicating passive transfer of antibodies from donor to recipient. All 8 patients showed active IgG seroconversion, as demonstrated by increasing IgG anti-HCV titres, on average, 75 days after infection. Five years after infection, all patients were still reactive for IgG anti-HCV antibodies and 7 were positive for HCV RNA by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Two of these PCR positive patients were also reactive for IgM anti-HCV. It is concluded that the serology of HCV infection does not follow the classical pattern of IgM response preceding detection of IgG. The IgM response may be absent, late, or persistent after HCV infection. The serological diagnosis of recent HCV infection should be based on the polymerase chain reaction or rising IgG titres in at least 2 sequential patient blood samples.

Storage conditions of blood samples and primer selection affect the yield of cDNA polymerase chain reaction products of hepatitis C virus

We have noticed that suboptimal specimen processing and storage conditions may cause false-negative results in the detection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA in plasma or serum. To establish the influence of specimen handling in a serological laboratory on the rate of detection of HCV RNA by the cDNA polymerase chain reaction (cDNA-PCR), we tested routine serum samples and fresh-frozen plasma samples from the same bleeding from confirmed anti-HCV-positive blood donors. When primers from the NS3/NS4 region were used, HCV RNA was detected in fresh-frozen plasma from 67% of the donors, whereas positive results were obtained with only 50% of the serum samples that had been subjected to routine serological procedures. Analysis of the same samples with primers from the highly conserved 5'-terminal region (5'-TR) revealed an HCV RNA detection rate of 92% for both the routine and the fresh-frozen samples. However, the yield of the amplification product in routine samples was strongly reduced compared with that in fresh-frozen plasma. Comparison of both primer sets for cDNA-PCR showed that the 5'-TR primer set was 10- to 100-fold more effective in detecting HCV RNA. We also analyzed the effect of storage of whole EDTA-blood and serum at room temperature and at 4 degrees C on the yield of the amplification product. A rapid decline in detectable HCV RNA of 3 to 4 log units was observed within 14 days when whole blood and serum were stored at room temperature. By contrast, no perceptible reduction in the cDNA-PCR signal was found in freshly prepared serum stored at 4 degrees C.

Sensitivity of an anti-HCV core peptide ELISA

A newly developed antibody assay based on a synthetic peptide of 15 amino acids derived from the core region of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) genome was evaluated in serum and plasma panels of (A) 225 haemophiliacs and (B) 44 patients with chronic non-A, non-B (NANB) hepatitis, and in (C) sequential serum samples of 9 patients with transfusion transmitted HCV infection. The new anti-core peptide ELISA was compared with the anti-C100 ELISA. For confirmation of HCV infection, samples were tested in a 4-antigen recombinant immunoblot assay (4-RIBA) and samples of panels B and C were also assayed in cDNA-polymerase chain reaction (PCR). In two panels with a high prevalence of HCV infection (88.4 and 70.5% in haemophilia and NANB hepatitis patients, respectively), the sensitivity of the anti-core peptide ELISA did not differ significantly from the sensitivity of the anti-C100 ELISA. The sensitivity of the new assay as compared with the anti-C100 assay was found to be 0.84 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.78-0.89] versus 0.92 (95% CI: 0.87-0.95) in haemophilia patients and 0.71 (95% CI: 0.52-0.86) versus 0.84 (95% CI: 0.66-0.95) in NANB hepatitis patients. In sequential serum samples of patients with transfusion-transmitted HCV infection antibodies to the core peptide (in 6/9 patients) appeared later than antibodies to C100 (in 7/9 patients): 168 (range: 70-322) and 143 (range: 59-365) days after transfusion, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Patterns of serological markers in transfusion-transmitted hepatitis C virus infection using second-generation HCV assays

A semiautomated dot blot assay and cDNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were used to study longitudinal anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) recognition patterns in relation to presence of HCV-RNA in transfusion recipients and their infectious donors. In 9 recipients, 4 different patterns of HCV infection were observed: (A) persistent HCV carriage accompanied by chronic hepatitis in 6, (B) acute resolved hepatitis, but persistent HCV replication in one, and (C) continuous HCV replication without hepatitis in one and (D) acute resolved hepatitis with clearance of infection in one. This last self-limited infection was characterized by the disappearance of HCV-RNA as well as anti-HCV reactivity. In contrast, antibody reactivity persisted in 7 of 8 patients with chronic HCV infection who could be followed until 1990. Seven of the 9 recipients developed antibodies to all recombinant peptides in dot blot assay; one became positive for anti-C33 and anti-core and one developed anti-core only. The sequence of appearance of antibodies differed among individual patients. In 7 patients with full anti-HCV recognition patterns, the sequence of events was (mean and limits in days after transfusion): onset of hepatitis at day 50 (22-74), seroconversion of anti-C33 at day 91 (59-129), anti-core at day 133 (54-203), and anti-C100 at day 143 (59-365). The incorporation of C33 and core proteins, in addition to C100, in the second generation anti-HCV ELISA enhanced the detection rate in the HCV-infected transfusion recipients from 7/9 (78%) to 9/9 (100%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Enhanced sensitivity of a second generation ELISA for antibody to hepatitis C virus

A second generation ELISA for combined detection of antibodies to three hepatitis C virus (HCV) recombinant proteins, i.e. C100, C33c and core, was compared with a first generation anti-HCV ELISA in which only antibodies to C100 are detected. The results of the ELISAs were evaluated in 225 haemophilia patients (panel A) and 44 patients with non-A, non-B (NANB) hepatitis (panel B). HCV infection was established by cDNA-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (in panel B only) and by studying the anti-HCV reaction patterns in 4 separate ELISAs for detection of antibodies to the recombinant proteins C100, C33c, core and a combination of two synthetic peptides sp67/65 derived from the C100 region. The sensitivity for the detection of HCV infection had increased from 0.92[95% confidence interval (CI): 0.87-0.95] to 1.00 (95% CI: 0.89-1.00) in haemophiliacs and from 0.84 (95% CI: 0.66-0.95) to 1.00 (95% CI: 0.89-1.00) in NANB hepatitis patients when the second generation ELISA was used instead of the first generation ELISA. Concurrently the chance of a false negative result was reduced in panel A and B from 0.37 to 0 and from 0.28 to 0, respectively. Analysis of anti-HCV reaction patterns revealed that 172 of 206 (83.5%) anti-HCV ELISA-reactive haemophilia patients had antibodies to all 4 antigens tested. In the NANB hepatitis patients 18 of 31 (58.1%) anti-HCV ELISA-reactive subjects reacted with 4 antigens. In the PCR tested panel of NANB hepatitis patients 2 subjects who showed antibody reactivity to only one antigen and 5 patients with reactivity to 2 antigens were PCR-positive.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Early antihepatitis C virus response with second-generation C200/C22 ELISA

Detection of early antibody to hepatitis C virus (HCV) by a new second-generation C200/C22 anti-HCV enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and a four-antigen recombinant immunoblot assay (4-RIBA) was compared with the first-generation anti-HCV C100 ELISA using sequential serum samples of 9 recipients who were infected with HCV, as detected by polymerase chain reaction after transfusion of blood products. Within 26 weeks after transfusion, 9/9 (100%) recipients seroconverted with C200/22 ELISA, and 6/9 (67%) seroconverted with C100 ELISA. Compared with C100 ELISA, C200/C22 ELISA seroconversion occurred simultaneously in 3 cases, 5-6 weeks earlier in 3 other cases, and 20 weeks earlier in 1 case. Seven of 9 (78%) recipients became positive, and 2/9 (22%) became indeterminate with 4-RIBA. In 8 cases with clinical posttransfusion hepatitis non-A, non-B (PTH-NANB), anti-HCV C200/C22 ELISA seroconversion occurred 2-17 (mean 6) weeks after the onset of hepatitis. In 6 cases of PTH-NANB, anti-HCV C100 ELISA seroconversion occurred 2-26 (mean 9) weeks after the onset of hepatitis. It is concluded that the second-generation C200/C22 ELISA is more sensitive than the C100 ELISA for the detection of antibody during early HCV infection. Indeterminate 4-RIBA results are found in the early phase of HCV infection.

HCV and blood transfusion

Posttransfusion hepatitis remains a threat to transfusion therapy. Testing for increased ALT levels has been used in an attempt to reduce this risk. Presence of the infectious agent, hepatitis C virus (HCV), appears to be a much more sensitive criterion. Stored serum samples from transfusion blood as well as recipients of transfusion were tested by ELISA, RIBA and PCR for the presence of HCV. The results show that RIBA and PCR are about equally sensitive and are able to detect HCV positivity in many sera that might have been otherwise transfused. Routine screening for the presence of virus will dramatically reduce the danger of hepatitis infection to transfusion patients.

New developments in hepatitis C

Since the detection of hepatitis B virus (HBV) in the 1960s and hepatitis A virus in the 1970s, a considerable proportion of infections of (probably viral) hepatitis could not be classified. About 90% of transfusion-related hepatitis was identified as non-A/non-B. In 1988 investigators from the Chiron Company (USA) detected the non-A, non-B agent and named it hepatitis C virus (HCV). An anti-HCV antibody assay (ELISA) and subsequently confirmation tests (immunoblot and polymerase chain reaction) were developed. HCV infection results in a chronic carrier state of the virus in about 80%. Almost all HCV carriers have, irrespective of their liver function tests, histologic signs of chronic hepatitis and/or liver cirrhosis. Chronic HCV infection is, like HBV, also associated with the development of hepatocellular carcinoma. Most HCV carriers are infected by parenteral routes (intravenous drug use, blood transfusion, tattooing). Intravenous drug users and haemophilia patients have the highest risk (80-90%) of becoming infected. Sexual and perinatal transmission does not play an important role in spreading the infection. Antiviral therapy (alpha-interferon) in patients with chronic hepatitis C will normalize liver function tests in about 25% of the cases, but it is unclear if the HCV carrier state will disappear and if liver cirrhosis will be prevented. At present no specific immunoglobulin or vaccine preparations are available to prevent the HCV infection.

Enhanced detection of HIV-1 sequences using polymerase chain reaction and a liquid hybridization technique. Application for individuals with questionable HIV-1 infection

In this report we describe a sensitive HIV-1 detection method which is applicable for confirmation testing of donors whose blood sample gives indeterminate viral-serology results. The method involves performing a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and detecting the generated fragments using liquid hybridization and gel retardation. We found that it is as specific as blotting on a filter and hybridization with an internal probe but at least tenfold more sensitive. After applying it on DNA samples of a panel of 11 persistent indeterminate anti-p24gag-reactive donors, none was found to be PCR positive. Considering other negative virological and biochemical test results and case-historical data, these donors are not likely to be HIV-1 infected.

Analysis of genomic variability of hepatitis C virus

The anti-C100-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, the new four-antigen antibody recombinant immunoblot assay, and detection of viral RNA sequences by copy DNA-polymerase chain reaction were used to establish the course of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in recipients of HCV-infected blood products. Different patterns of infection were observed: (1) persistent HCV infection with and without chronic hepatitis, and with acute resolved hepatitis; and (2) acute resolved hepatitis with clearance of HCV. In order to determine whether different infection- and anti-HCV recognition patterns are correlated to differences in viral nucleotide sequences, we compared sequences in the NS3 region between isolates from recipient(s) and their infective donors. Based on these comparisons we conclude that in The Netherlands two types of molecular variants circulate; one resembling the Japanese prototype isolate JH1, and the other the HCV-1 isolate from the U.S.A. The difference in sequence homology between the two types is approximately 24%. Comparison of sequences of donors and involved recipients determined in isolates prepared from blood samples four years after transfusion revealed that viral RNA sequences are strongly conserved (greater than 96.8%) in the NS3 region. These data indicate that the observed differences in anti-HCV immune response patterns between recipients are more a reflection of their immune reactivity than of divergence of viral strains.