A simplified index to quantify the irritation/corrosion potential of chemicals - Part II: Eye

Eye irritation is a key human health endpoint assessed by in vitro and in vivo methods. One of the commonly used scoring methods to quantify the eye irritation potential of chemicals is the Modified Maximum Average Score (MMAS). It is dependent on the eye irritation effects (e.g. corneal opacity) originally proposed by Draize and then partially adopted by the OECD TG 405. These scores are not always fully reported in regulatory dossiers and lead to several drawbacks, 1) the difficulty to translate MMAS into a classification within the existing EU CLP/UN GHS criteria, 2) the absence of corrosion (serious eye damage), and 3) the dependency on input parameters which are usually not required under the OECD TGs (e.g. eye surface area). This study determined if classification can be driven by a maximum of two observed effects thereby simplifying the scoring calculation. The Simplified Irritation Index (SII_EYE), based only on corneal opacity and conjunctival redness, was developed using validated studies representing multiple chemical groups. A correlation was observed between the MMAS and the SII_EYE allowing harmonisation of the classification for the existing data. This index proved to be useful in the development of in silico model.

A simplified index to quantify the irritation/corrosion potential of chemicals - Part I: Skin

Skin irritation is a key human health endpoint assessed by in vitro and in vivo methods. The OECD TG 404 guideline (in vivo) is based on erythema and oedema translated semi-quantitatively into Draize scores, providing hazard statements for substance classification following EUCLP/UNGHS criteria. Draize scores require quantitation from subjective in vivo observations, to obtain a scoring index, the Primary Irritation Index (PII). However, it is not recognised under REACH due to translating difficulties, notably the cut-off limit for classification and non-inclusion of corrosive effects. The aim of this study was to determine if classification can be driven by just one of the observed effects, erythema only, to create a Simplified Irritation Index (SII_SKIN). This simplifies the scoring calculation and reduces subjectivity. A quantitative approach with cut-off limits is thus proposed for classification. Substances can be classified as non-irritant, potentially irritant, irritant, or corrosive. The Simplifed Irritation Index (SII_SKIN) is based on validated studies, representing multiple chemical groups. A significant correlation between SII_SKIN and the harmonised classification was observed, and a proportionate relationship between the SII_SKIN and the corresponding PII. The index proved to be useful in the development of an in silico model.

Comprehensive review of several surfactants in marine environments: Fate and ecotoxicity

Surfactants are a commercially important group of chemicals widely used on a global scale. Despite high removal efficiencies during wastewater treatment, their high consumption volumes mean that a certain fraction will always enter aquatic ecosystems, with marine environments being the ultimate sites of deposition. Consequently, surfactants have been detected within marine waters and sediments. However, aquatic environmental studies have mostly focused on the freshwater environment, and marine studies are considerably underrepresented by comparison. The present review aims to provide a summary of current marine environmental fate (monitoring, biodegradation, and bioconcentration) and effects data of 5 key surfactant groups: linear alkylbenzene sulfonates, alcohol ethoxysulfates, alkyl sulfates, alcohol ethoxylates, and ditallow dimethyl ammonium chloride. Monitoring data are currently limited, especially for alcohol ethoxysulfates and alkyl sulfates. Biodegradation was shown to be considerably slower under marine conditions, whereas ecotoxicity studies suggest that marine species are approximately equally as sensitive to these surfactants as freshwater species. Marine bioconcentration studies are almost nonexistent. Current gaps within the literature are presented, thereby highlighting research areas where additional marine studies should focus.

From Bioavailability Science to Regulation of Organic Chemicals

The bioavailability of organic chemicals in soil and sediment is an important area of scientific investigation for environmental scientists, although this area of study remains only partially recognized by regulators and industries working in the environmental sector. Regulators have recently started to consider bioavailability within retrospective risk assessment frameworks for organic chemicals; by doing so, realistic decision-making with regard to polluted environments can be achieved, rather than relying on the traditional approach of using total-extractable concentrations. However, implementation remains difficult because scientific developments on bioavailability are not always translated into ready-to-use approaches for regulators. Similarly, bioavailability remains largely unexplored within prospective regulatory frameworks that address the approval and regulation of organic chemicals. This article discusses bioavailability concepts and methods, as well as possible pathways for the implementation of bioavailability into risk assessment and regulation; in addition, this article offers a simple, pragmatic and justifiable approach for use within retrospective and prospective risk assessment.

European Chemicals Agency dossier submissions as an experimental data source: refinement of a fish toxicity model for predicting acute LC50 values

As a result of the stringent data requirements of the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation, and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) regulation, a vast amount of ecotoxicological data has become available through the dissemination portal of the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). As of April 2014, the database contained 12,439 unique substances from 47,909 dossiers. This vast database could be used to refine existing, or to create new, non-testing methods, such as quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs). Acute fish toxicity data were mined from the ECHA database using the eChemPortal; after filtering for single organic substances, 1159 experimental data points remained, representing 564 compounds. To evaluate the quality and accessibility of this data, the authors used the data to refine and improve an existing QSAR. The reliability of the data submitted to the ECHA database, as well as the effectiveness of the Klimisch scoring system, were assessed by comparing the refined QSAR with established QSAR benchmarks. The model developed meets all Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development principles, has strong internal (leave-one-out internally cross-validated correlation coefficient [Q(2)(LOO)] = 0.91) and external (external coefficient of determination (predicted vs experimental [test set])) validation statistics, and can provide reliable fish median lethal concentration (LC50) predictions for non-polar narcotics. Although some issues with dossier misinformation were discovered, it was found that the ECHA dissemination portal is a valuable and reliable data source. When queried using the eChemPortal, chemical dossiers containing reliable data could be found quickly. The ECHA dissemination portal holds great potential for future QSAR development and improvement, such as updating QSARs within the Ecological Structure-Activity Relationships (ECOSAR) program.

MonitoringBase Surfactants – A Database Specifically for Storage of Environmental Data on Surfactants in Europe

A database has been developed in MS Access™ for storage and retrieval of environmental data of surfactants in Europe, as well as general information on major surfactant monitoring programs. The database contains measured concentrations (about 2100 data points) for 8 surfactant groups collected from scientific literature and unpublished reports. The quality of the monitoring data was evaluated and scored using an approach similar to the Klimisch method for judging ecotoxicology and toxicology data. The assignments involve four “Klimisch”-like categories (reliable without restriction, reliable with restriction, not reliable, not assignable), and are based on six key features of a monitoring study, of which three features were found the most important. The proposed evaluation and scoring approach is widely applicable and can easily be applied for other environmental contaminants.