Temporal Trends of Health Disparity in the Utilization of Curative-Intent Treatments for Hepatocellular Carcinoma- Are we making progress?

BACKGROUND

Liver-directed treatments: ablative therapy (AT), surgical resection (SR), liver transplantation (LT), as well Trans-Arterial Chemoembolization (TACE) improve OS for early-stage HCC. While racial and socioeconomic disparities impact access to liver-directed therapies, their temporal trends for the curative-intent treatment of HCC remain to be elucidated.

METHODS

We performed chi-square, logistic regression, and temporal trends analyses on data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2011-2019. The outcome of interest was the rate of AT, SR, LT (curative-intent treatments), and TACE utilization, and the primary predictors were racial/ethnic group, and SES (insurance status).

RESULTS

African-American and Hispanic patients had lower odds of receiving AT - (African-American: OR=0.78, p<0.001), (Hispanic: OR=0.84, p=0.005); and SR - (African-American: OR=0.71, p<0.001), (Hispanics: OR=0.64, p<0.001) compared with white patients. The odds of LT was lower for African-American (OR=0.76, p<0.001) but higher for Hispanic patients (OR=1.25, p=0.001) compared to white patients. Low SES had worse odds of AT (OR=0.79, p=0.001), SR (OR=0.66, p<0.001), and LT (OR=0.84, p=0.028) compared to high SES. While curative-intent treatments showed significant upward temporal trends among White (10.6% to 13.9%, p<0.001), and API/Other patients (14.4% to 15.7%, p=0.007), there were non-significant trends among African-American (10.9% to 10.1%, p=0.825) or Hispanic patients (12.2% to 13.7%, p=0.056).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates concerning disparities in the utilization of curative-intent treatment for HCC based on race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. Moreover, racial/ethnic disparities have widened rather than improved over time.

Restructuring lung cancer care to accelerate diagnosis and treatment in patients vulnerable to healthcare disparities using an innovative care model

The diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer is challenged by complex diagnostic pathways and fragmented care that can lead to disparities for vulnerable patients. Our model involved a multi-institutional, multidisciplinary conference to address the complexity of lung cancer care in vulnerable patient populations. The conference was conducted using a process adapted from the problem-solving method entitled FastTrack, pioneered by General Electric. Conference attendees established critical social determinants of health specific to lung cancer and designed a practical care model to accelerate diagnosis and treatment in this population. The resulting care delivery model, the Lung Cancer Strategist Program (LCSP), was led by a lung cancer trained advanced practice provider (APP) to expedite diagnosis, surgical and oncologic consultation, and treatment of a suspicious lung nodule. We compared the timeliness of care, care efficiency, and oncologic outcomes in 100 LCSP patients and 100 routine referral patients at the same thoracic surgery clinic. Patient triage through our integrated care model transitioned initial referral evaluation to a lung cancer trained APP to coordinate multidisciplinary patient-centered care that was highly individualized and significantly reduced the time to diagnosis and treatment among vulnerable patients at high-risk for treatment delay due to healthcare disparities.•To develop the Lung Cancer Strategist Program care model, we used a three-step (Design, Meeting, and Culmination), team-based, problem-solving process entitled FastTrack.•An advantage of FastTrack is its ability to overcome barriers embedded within hierarchal and institutional social systems, empowering those closest to the relevant issue to propose and enact meaningful change.•Under this framework, we engaged a diverse field of experts to assess systemic barriers in lung cancer care and design an innovative care pathway to improve the timeliness and efficiency of lung cancer care in patients at risk for healthcare disparities.

Pretest Video Education Versus Genetic Counseling for Patients With Prostate Cancer: ProGen, A Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial

PURPOSE

Germline genetic testing (GT) is recommended for men with prostate cancer (PC), but testing through traditional models is limited. The ProGen study examined a novel model aimed at providing access to GT while promoting education and informed consent.

METHODS

Men with potentially lethal PC (metastatic, localized with a Gleason score of ≥8, persistent prostate-specific antigen after local therapy), diagnosis age ≤55 years, previous malignancy, and family history suggestive of a pathogenic variant (PV) and/or at oncologist's discretion were randomly assigned 3:1 to video education (VE) or in-person genetic counseling (GC). Participants had 67 genes analyzed (Ambry), with results disclosed via telephone by a genetic counselor. Outcomes included GT consent, GT completion, PV prevalence, and survey measures of satisfaction, psychological impact, genetics knowledge, and family communication. Two-sided Fisher's exact tests were used for between-arm comparisons.

RESULTS

Over a 2-year period, 662 participants at three sites were randomly assigned and pretest VE (n = 498) or GC (n = 164) was completed by 604 participants (VE, 93.1%; GC, 88.8%), of whom 596 participants (VE, 98.9%; GC, 97.9%) consented to GT and 591 participants completed GT (VE, 99.3%; GC, 98.6%). These differences were not statistically significant although subtle differences in satisfaction and psychological impact were. Notably, 84 PVs were identified in 78 participants (13.2%), with BRCA1/2 PV comprising 32% of participants with a positive result (BRCA2 n = 21, BRCA1 n = 4).

CONCLUSION

Both VE and traditional GC yielded high GT uptake without significant differences in outcome measures of completion, GT uptake, genetics knowledge, and family communication. The increased demand for GT with limited genetics resources supports consideration of pretest VE for patients with PC.

Training Hematologists/Oncologists for the Academic-Community Hybrid: Creating a Fellowship Framework for the Future

PURPOSE:

Conventional hematology/oncology fellowship training is designed to foster careers in academic practice through intensive exposure to clinical and laboratory research. Even so, a notable proportion of graduating fellows opt to pursue a clinically focused career outside the realm of academic medicine. Given the corresponding shortage of oncologists in nonurban and rural settings, improving the representation of hematologists/oncologists in the community setting is a national priority.

METHODS:

We reviewed current national challenges and changing models of cancer care delivery in the context of the traditional academic training model along with trends in practice patterns for recent hematology/oncology graduates. We defined the Academic-Community hybrid (ACH) and how it supports the evolution in contemporary models of cancer care. We then drew on the authors’ experiences to formulate an innovative goal-concordant training paradigm for fellows seeking careers in the ACH model.

RESULTS:

The ACH hematology/oncology fellowship training pathway emphasizes and optimizes professional development domains including clinical care, patient safety and quality improvement, business and operations, cancer care equity and community access, healthy policy and alignment with professional organizations, and medical education.

CONCLUSION:

This novel hematology/oncology training model provides a paradigm for optimizing preparedness for practice in an increasingly complex cancer care delivery environment while addressing workforce shortages and health disparities.

Race, Age, Gender, and Insurance Status: A Comparative Analysis of Access to and Quality of Gastrointestinal Cancer Care

BACKGROUND

Socioeconomics, demographics, and insurance status play roles in healthcare access. Considering the limited resources available, understanding the relative impact of disparities helps prioritize programs designed to overcome them. This study evaluates gastrointestinal cancer care disparity by comparing the impact of different patient factors across oncologic care metrices.

METHODS

A multi-institutional prospectively maintained cancer database was reviewed retrospectively for gastrointestinal cancers (esophagus, stomach, liver, pancreas, colorectal, and hepato-pancreato-biliary) from 2007 to 2017 to assess quality of care provided. Quality of care was defined by clinical course following national guidelines for the respective cancer. This included surgical intervention, chemotherapy, palliative care, and minimal delay to treatment/diagnosis. Logistic regression was used to adjust for confounders and identify factors associated with quality of care. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were compared using log-rank test.

RESULTS

One thousand seventy-two patients were identified. Survival improved in patients with private insurance compared to government-funded options [median overall survival (mOS) 57.8 vs. 21.2 months; P < .001]. Private insurance also correlated with earlier stage at diagnosis [stages I-II = 50.9% vs. 37.5%, stages III-IV = 37.7% vs. 49.1%, P < .001], increased chemotherapy use [44.2% vs. 37.1%, P < .001], and more surgical intervention [62.4% vs. 48.8%, P < .001]. Outcomes were inferior for Black Americans, including trend towards lower rate of surgical treatment [42% vs. 54%, P = .058] and worse survival in private insurance carriers [mOS 7.8 vs. 57.8 months, P = .021] and those with early stage disease [mOS 39.2 vs. 81.5 months, P = .045] compared to White counterparts.

CONCLUSIONS

Insurance status has the strongest impact on the quality of gastrointestinal oncologic care with negative synergistic negative effect of race for Black Americans. While governmental programs aim to improve equality of care, there remains significant disparity compared to private insurance. Moreover, private insurance doesn't correct disparity for Black Americans, suggesting the need to address racial imbalances in cancer care.

Access to Cancer Care Resources in a Federally Qualified Health Center: a Mixed Methods Study to Increase the Understanding of Met and Unmet Needs of Cancer Survivors

Assessing the met and unmet needs of cancer survivors is critical in optimizing access to cancer services especially in underserved populations. The purpose of this study is to expand our understanding of the priority needs for cancer survivorship within racial/ethnic and underserved populations that speak either English or Spanish and seek health care in a federally qualified health center (FQHC). A convergent mixed methods design integrating survey and focus group data was utilized for this study. A total of 17 participants were enrolled in the study. The meta-inferences were drawn by looking across the top ten matched survey and focus group met and unmet needs including psychological, informational, and health system as well as patient care and support. The preferred languages of participants were Spanish 53% (n = 9) and English 47% (n = 8), and the survival breakdown was 65% (n = 11) within 0-5 years with 17.5% (n = 3), 6-10 years and 17.5% (n = 3), and 17.5% (n = 3) > 11 years. The most frequently met needs included health care providers and hospital staff being attentive to their physical and emotional needs and feeling they were treated with respect. Unmet needs were often related to physical and daily living needs such as pain, fatigue, sadness, depression, and not being able to work. Providing a needs-based approach of cancer health services in a FQHC or similar community-based health center is critical to meet the needs of cancer survivors to improve health outcomes and quality of life.

Racial Differences in Smoking-related Disease Risk Perceptions Among Adults Completing Lung Cancer Screening: Follow-up Results from the ACRIN/NLST Ancillary Study

Previous work suggests that, compared to white adults, black adults have lower perceived risk for smoking-related diseases (SRDs), which may influence cessation behavior and health outcomes; however, racial differences in SRD risk perceptions among high-risk patients (i.e., a group that exhibits elevated risk for SRDs) following lung screening remain unknown. This paper thus examined differences in risk perceptions for lung cancer and other SRDs among black and white National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) participants. We administered a 10-item measure of perceived lifetime risk of lung cancer and other SRD (Smoking Risk Perceptions Scale; SRPS) to NLST participants at 1 year following lung screening to (1) establish the internal consistency of the SRPS for both black and white participants, (2) compare smoking-related disease risk perceptions between black and white participants, and (3) identify predictors of risk perceptions for black and white participants using multivariable linear regression models. We determined the SRPS items loaded onto two factors (personal and comparative risks; Cronbach's alpha = 0.93 and 0.95 for 1743 white and 194 black participants, respectively), thus demonstrating high internal consistency for both black and white adults. Compared to white participants, black adults demonstrated lower SRD risk perceptions (SRPS range = 10-50, mean difference = 2.55, SE = 0.50, p < 0.001), even after adjusting for smoking status and sociodemographics. Younger age, female gender, higher education, white race, and current smoking status were independently associated with high risk perceptions. Sociodemographic factors associated with lower risk perceptions resemble factors related to continued smoking. Findings suggest current and former black smokers are at risk of having lower risk perceptions for lung cancer and SRDs than white adults following lung cancer screening; these differences may explain observed racial differences in cessation outcomes. Although similar factors influence black and white adults' beliefs, risk perceptions may differentially impact smoking behavior among these groups. Behavior change models that guide tobacco treatment approaches, particularly for high-risk black smokers, should consider the influence of cultural factors on risk perceptions and cessation efforts.

Comparison of Prevalence and Types of Mutations in Lung Cancers Among Black and White Populations

Importance

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in the United States in all ethnic and racial groups. The overall death rate from lung cancer is higher in black patients than in white patients.

Objective

To compare the prevalence and types of somatic alterations between lung cancers from black patients and white patients. Differences in mutational frequencies could illuminate differences in prognosis and lead to the reduction of outcome disparities by more precisely targeting patients' treatment.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Tumor specimens were collected from Baptist Cancer Center (Memphis, Tennessee) over the course of 9 years (January 2004-December 2012). Genomic analysis by massively parallel sequencing of 504 cancer genes was performed at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (Boston, Massachusetts). Overall, 509 lung cancer tumors specimens (319 adenocarcinomas; 142 squamous cell carcinomas) were profiled from 245 black patients and 264 white patients.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The frequencies of genomic alterations were compared between tumors from black and white populations.

Results

Overall, 509 lung cancers were collected and analyzed (273 women [129 black patients; 144 white patients] and 236 men [116 black patients; 120 white patients]). Using 313 adenocarcinomas and 138 squamous cell carcinomas with genetically supported ancestry, overall mutational frequencies and copy number changes were not significantly different between black and white populations in either tumor type after correcting for multiple hypothesis testing. Furthermore, specific activating alterations in members of the receptor tyrosine kinase/Ras/Raf pathway including EGFR and KRAS were not significantly different between populations in lung adenocarcinoma.

Conclusions and Relevance

These results demonstrate that lung cancers from black patients are similar to cancers from white patients with respect to clinically actionable genomic alterations and suggest that clinical trials of targeted therapies could significantly benefit patients in both groups.

Patient and caregiver perspectives on decision support for symptom and quality of life management during cancer treatment: Implications for eHealth

OBJECTIVES

Adequate symptom and quality-of-life (SQL) management is a priority during cancer treatment. eHealth is a timely way to enhance patient-engagement, facilitate communication, and improve health outcomes. The objectives of this study were to describe patient and caregivers' perspectives for providing, processing, and managing SQL data to enhance communication and identify desired components for decision support.

METHODS

Data were collected from 64 participants through questionnaires and focus groups. Analysis was conducted using NVivo. Open and axial coding was completed, grouping commonalities and large constructs into nodes to identify and synthesize themes.

RESULTS

Face-to-face meetings with clinicians were the prime time to communicate, and patients strove to understand treatment options and the effect on SQL by bringing caregivers to their visits, taking notes, tracking symptoms, and creating portable health records. Patients/caregivers struggled to self-manage their symptoms and were uncertain when to contact clinicians when experiencing uncontrolled symptoms. Most participants identified eHealth solutions for decision support. However, 38% of participants (n = 24) rarely used computers and identified non-eHealth options for decision support. Core components for both eHealth and non-eHealth systems were access to (1) cancer information, (2) medical records, (3) peer support, and (4) improved support and understanding on when to contact clinicians.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients were faced with an overwhelming amount of information and relied on their caregivers to help navigate the complexities of cancer care and self-manage SQL. Health technologies can provide informational support; however, decision support needs to span multiple venues to avoid increasing disparities caused by a digital divide.

Deploying Team Science Principles to Optimize Interdisciplinary Lung Cancer Care Delivery: Avoiding the Long and Winding Road to Optimal Care

The complexity of lung cancer care mandates interaction between clinicians with different skill sets and practice cultures in the routine delivery of care. Using team science principles and a case-based approach, we exemplify the need for the development of real care teams for patients with lung cancer to foster coordination among the multiple specialists and staff engaged in routine care delivery. Achieving coordinated lung cancer care is a high-priority public health challenge because of the volume of patients, lethality of disease, and well-described disparities in quality and outcomes of care. Coordinating mechanisms need to be cultivated among different types of specialist physicians and care teams, with differing technical expertise and practice cultures, who have traditionally functioned more as coactively working groups than as real teams. Coordinating mechanisms, including shared mental models, high-quality communication, mutual trust, and mutual performance monitoring, highlight the challenge of achieving well-coordinated care and illustrate how team science principles can be used to improve quality and outcomes of lung cancer care. To develop the evidence base to support coordinated lung cancer care, research comparing the effectiveness of a diverse range of multidisciplinary care team approaches and interorganizational coordinating mechanisms should be promoted.

Racial Differences in Tobacco Cessation and Treatment Usage After Lung Screening: An Examination of the National Lung Screening Trial

BACKGROUND

Black smokers have demonstrated greater lung cancer disease burden and poorer smoking cessation outcomes compared with whites. Lung cancer screening represents a unique opportunity to promote cessation among smokers; however, little is known about the differential impact of screening on smoking behaviors among black and white smokers. Using data from the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST), we examined the racial differences in smoking behaviors after screening.

METHODS

We examined racial differences in smoking behavior and cessation activity among 6,316 white and 497 black (median age, 60 and 59 years, respectively) NLST participants who were current smokers at screening using a follow-up survey on 24-hour and 7-day quit attempts, 6-month continuous abstinence, and the use of smoking cessation programs and aids at 12 months after screening. Using multiple regression analyses, we examined the predictors of 24-hour and 7-day quit attempts and 6-month continuous abstinence.

RESULTS

At 12 months after screening, blacks were more likely to report a 24-hour (52.7% vs. 41.2%, p < .0001) or 7-day (33.6% vs. 27.2%, p = .002) quit attempt. However, no significant racial differences were found in 6-month continuous abstinence (5.6% blacks vs. 7.2% whites). In multiple regression, black race was predictive of a higher likelihood of a 24-hour (odds ratio [OR], 1.6, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-2.0) and 7-day (OR, 1.5, 95% CI, 1.1-1.8) quit attempt; however, race was not associated with 6-month continuous abstinence. Only a positive screening result for lung cancer was significantly predictive of successful 6-month continuous abstinence (OR, 2.3, 95% CI, 1.8-2.9).

CONCLUSION

Although blacks were more likely than whites to have 24-hour and 7-day quit attempts, the rates of 6-month continuous abstinence did not differ. Targeted interventions are needed at the time of lung cancer screening to promote abstinence among all smokers.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Among smokers undergoing screening for lung cancer, blacks were more likely than whites to have 24-hour and 7-day quit attempts; however, these attempts did not translate to increased rates of 6-month continuous abstinence among black smokers. Targeted interventions are needed at the time of lung cancer screening to convert quit attempts to sustained smoking cessation among all smokers.

Abstract 3886: Comparing the mutational landscape of African American and Caucasian lung cancers

Background: The overall death rate from lung cancer is higher in African-Americans (AA) compared to Caucasians (CAU). Understanding differences in the prevalence and type of somatic alterations between races may illuminate differences in prognosis and lead to the reduction of outcome disparities by more precisely targeting patients’ treatment.

Methods: Formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tumor samples were collected from Baptist Cancer Center, Memphis, TN. DNA was extracted and sonicated to 250 bp following Covaris FFPE DNA Extraction & Purification protocol and further purified using Agencourt AMPure XP beads. The OncoPanel_v2 target enrichment panel (Agilent SureSelect) was used for hybrid capture of 502 cancer-related genes. Samples were pooled and sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq2500 to a mean depth of coverage of 210x. Tumors with &gt;30x sequencing depth over &gt;80% of targeted bases were considered for analysis. MuTect and SomaticIndelDetector were used to identify somatic single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and short insertions or deletions (indels), respectively. As matched normal DNA was not available for these samples, analysis was limited to variants previously observed in tumors as described in the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (COSMIC) database, and variants were excluded if found in the germline dataset of the Exome Sequencing Project (ESP).

Results: 510 tumor specimens from 242 Black and 268 White patients (with self-reported race) were analyzed including 320 adenocarcinomas and 142 squamous cell carcinomas. Pathological classification was independently reviewed and confirmed for 374 of 472 cases for an overall concordance rate of 79%. Using principle component analysis (PCA) on germline SNVs, we observed that the biological ancestry was different than the self-reported race for 1.5% of patients. Mutational frequencies for genes with known roles in adenocarcinoma such as KRAS and EGFR were not significantly different between tumors from Black and White patients (Fisher's exact p-value &gt; 0.05). Amplification rates for NKX2-1, MET, MDM2, and MYC and homozygous deletion rates for CDKN2A were also not significantly different between populations. Translocations involving ALK and ROS1 were detected in tumors from Black patients demonstrating that these events are present in both populations. Similarly, mutational frequencies for genes such as PIK3CA and PTEN were not significantly different across populations in squamous cell carcinomas.

Conclusions: These results demonstrate that lung cancers from Black patients are more similar to Whites than East Asians with respect to genes such as EGFR, and suggest that clinical trials of targeted therapies could significantly benefit patients in both populations.

Citation Format: Joshua Campbell, Christopher Lathan, Lynette Sholl, Matthew Ducar, Mikenah Vega, Ling Lin, Aaron Thorner, Nick Faris, Paul van Hummelen, Raymond Osarogiagbon, Matthew Meyerson, Laura MacConaill. Comparing the mutational landscape of African American and Caucasian lung cancers. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 3886. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-3886

Getting back to equal: The influence of insurance status on racial disparities in the treatment of African American men with high-risk prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES

Treating high-risk prostate cancer (CaP) with definitive therapy improves survival. We evaluated whether having health insurance reduces racial disparities in the use of definitive therapy for high-risk CaP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program was used to identify 70,006 men with localized high-risk CaP (prostate-specific antigen level > 20 ng/ml or Gleason score 8-10 or stage > cT3a) diagnosed from 2007 to 2010. We used multivariable logistic regression to analyze the 64,277 patients with complete data to determine the factors associated with receipt of definitive therapy.

RESULTS

Compared with white men, African American (AA) men were significantly less likely to receive definitive treatment (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.60; 95% CI: 0.56-0.64; P < 0.001) after adjusting for sociodemographics and known CaP prognostic factors. There was a significant interaction between race and insurance status (P interaction = 0.01) such that insurance coverage was associated with a reduction in racial disparity between AA and white patients regarding receipt of definitive therapy. Specifically, the AOR for definitive treatment for AA vs. white was 0.38 (95% CI: 0.27-0.54, P < 0.001) among uninsured men, whereas the AOR was 0.62 (95% CI: 0.57-0.66, P < 0.001) among insured men.

CONCLUSIONS

AA men with high-risk CaP were significantly less likely to receive potentially life-saving definitive treatment when compared with white men. Having health insurance was associated with a reduction in this racial treatment disparity, suggesting that expansion of health insurance coverage may help reduce racial disparities in the management of aggressive cancers.

Race by sex differences in depression symptoms and psychosocial service use among non-Hispanic black and white patients with lung cancer

PURPOSE

This study examined race by sex differences in depression symptoms and psychosocial service use (pastors, social workers, mental health workers, support groups) among patients with lung cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The multiregional Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance study surveyed black and white adults with stages I to III lung cancer (n = 1,043) about depression symptoms, interest in help for mood, and psychosocial service use. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate race/sex differences in depression symptoms (modified Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale ≥ 6) and psychosocial service use, independent of demographic, clinical, psychosocial, and behavioral covariates.

RESULTS

A total of 18.2% screened positive for depression symptoms. This proportion was highest among black men (24.7%), followed by white women (20.6%), black women (15.8%), and white men (15.0%). In adjusted analyses, white women showed greater risk for depression symptoms relative to black women (P = .01) and white men (P = .002), with no other differences among groups. Black patients were less likely than white patients to receive desired help for mood from their doctors (P = .02), regardless of sex. Among all patients, black women were most likely to have contact with pastoral care and social work.

CONCLUSION

Race and sex interacted to predict risk of depression symptoms. Covariates accounted for elevated risk among black men. White women showed greater risk than black women and white men, independent of covariates. Black patients may experience greater barriers to receiving help for mood from their doctors. Race by sex differences in contact with psychosocial services highlight potential differences in the extent to which services are available, acceptable, and/or sought by patients.

Racial differences in perceived risk in participants enrolled in the American College of Radiology (ACRIN-6654) arm of the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST)

1563

Background: Blacks in the U.S. have higher incidence and mortality rates of lung cancer (LC) compared to whites. Previous work in small studies suggests that blacks have lower perceived risk of LC which may influence smoking cessation behavior. However, racial disparities in risk perceptions (RP) of LC and smoking related diseases (SRD) in heavy smokers have not been studied. We examined LC and SRD risk perceptions among black and white ACRIN NLST participants. Methods: The 10-item Smoking Risk Perceptions Scale (SRPS) for LC and SRD was administered to NLST participants, from 4 ACRIN sites, with a minimum 30 pack-year smoking history at 1 year following baseline screening chest x-ray or low dose computerized tomography (LDCT). We 1) validated the SRPS in black and white participants separately using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, 2) used 2-way ANOVAs to compare RP of black and white participants and 3) used multivariable linear regression models to identify factors associated with RP. Results: Among 1742 white and 194 black participants, the 10 SRPS items loaded onto two factors (absolute and relative risk; Cronbach’s alpha=0.92 and 0.95 for white and black participants, respectively). Black participants had significantly lower RP compared to white participants (SRPS range= 10-50, mean diff. 3.48, 95% CI 2.29-4.68, p<0.01). Factors significantly associated with lower RP in a multivariate linear regression were black race (β=4.59, p < 0.001), former smoking status (β=3.82, p<0.001), male gender (β=1.35, p<0.001), lower education (β=1.16, p =0.010), and older age (years, β = 0.15, p<0.001). Conclusions: We validated the SRPS in black and white ACRIN-6654/NLST participants. Blacks had significantly lower perceptions of LC and SRD risk compared to whites, even after adjusting for study arm, sociodemographics, and smoking status. Sociodemographic factors and smoking status were independently associated with lower RP. These findings confirm that black current and former smokers are at risk of underestimating their smoking-related risk, which may contribute to lower rates of adherence to screening and smoking cessation recommendations.

Clinical trial participation among ethnic/racial minority and majority patients with advanced cancer: what factors most influence enrollment?

BACKGROUND

Studies using administrative data report that racial/ethnic minority patients enroll in clinical trials less frequently than white patients. We studied a cohort of terminally ill cancer patients to determine a) if racial/ethnic minority patients have lower rates of drug trial enrollment than white patients once socioeconomic characteristics are accounted for and b) what factors most influence drug trial enrollment among patients with advanced canceroverall.

METHODS

Coping with Cancer (CwC) is a National Cancer Institute/National Institute of Mental Health (NCI/NIMH)-funded multisite, prospective, longitudinal study of patients with advanced cancer. Baseline interviews assessed drug trial enrollment as well as socioeconomic characteristics. Logistic regression models estimated associations between drug trial enrollment and baseline characteristics. Stepwise, backward, and subset model selection was applied to select the final model where characteristics significant at α=0.05 remained in the model.

RESULTS

At a median of 4.4 months prior to death, 35 of 358 patients (9.8%) were enrolled in a drug trial. In unadjusted analyses, race/ethnicity, health insurance, performance status, recruitment site, cancer type, preference for life-extending care, and lack of end-of-life care planning were associated (p<0.05) with enrollment. In multivariable analysis, patient race/ethnicity was not significantly associated with enrollment. Patients who reported not having an end-of-life discussion (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.18; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.04-0.83) and those not wanting to discuss life expectancy (AOR, 0.31; 95%CI 0.12-0.79) were more likely to be trial enrollees.

CONCLUSION

Patient race/ethnicity was not associated with clinical trial enrollment after adjustment for socioeconomic covariates. Patients with advanced cancer endorsing less engagement in end-of-life planning were more likely to be enrolled in a clinical trial.

A novel ALK secondary mutation and EGFR signaling cause resistance to ALK kinase inhibitors

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), including crizotinib, are effective treatments in preclinical models and in cancer patients with ALK-translocated cancers. However, their efficacy will ultimately be limited by the development of acquired drug resistance. Here we report two mechanisms of ALK TKI resistance identified from a crizotinib-treated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patient and in a cell line generated from the resistant tumor (DFCI076) as well as from studying a resistant version of the ALK TKI (TAE684)-sensitive H3122 cell line. The crizotinib-resistant DFCI076 cell line harbored a unique L1152R ALK secondary mutation and was also resistant to the structurally unrelated ALK TKI TAE684. Although the DFCI076 cell line was still partially dependent on ALK for survival, it also contained concurrent coactivation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling. In contrast, the TAE684-resistant (TR3) H3122 cell line did not contain an ALK secondary mutation but instead harbored coactivation of EGFR signaling. Dual inhibition of both ALK and EGFR was the most effective therapeutic strategy for the DFCI076 and H3122 TR3 cell lines. We further identified a subset (3/50; 6%) of treatment naive NSCLC patients with ALK rearrangements that also had concurrent EGFR activating mutations. Our studies identify resistance mechanisms to ALK TKIs mediated by both ALK and by a bypass signaling pathway mediated by EGFR. These mechanisms can occur independently, or in the same cancer, suggesting that the combination of both ALK and EGFR inhibitors may represent an effective therapy for these subsets of NSCLC patients.

Abstract A14: Qualitative study of African American smokers regarding lung cancer

Background: The differences in mortality and incidence for lung cancer in African Americans are well-documented; however, the underlying reasons for these disparities are not well-delineated. The role that patient preferences and knowledge play in exploring these patterns among African American patients is unclear. This qualitative study was designed to explore potential themes involving treatment, and assess the level of general knowledge about lung cancer in African Americans.

Methods: 32 African American smokers with ages ranging from 26 to 70 years of age, (mean, 47.5 years), who did not have a cancer diagnosis were recruited to a series of focus groups held in a Boston housing complex. Four focus groups were held over an 8-week period. The groups were evenly divided between men and women. Focus groups were facilitated by a trained qualitative researcher and the sessions were audio taped. The data was transcribed and analyzed using standard anthropology coding and thematic formulation processes.

Results: Participants understood the link between smoking and lung cancer, as well as the common signs and symptoms of the disease. Regarding prevention, participants wanted the information to be in-depth, and tailored to their situation. They were familiar with the lethality of lung cancer, and had a good working knowledge of the treatment modalities. The impact of patient preferences and mistrust on treatment choice was minimal. When asked specifically about the role of race in getting appropriate treatment for lung cancer; most participants felt that insurance and socioeconomic factors were more important than race.

Conclusions: This study suggests that African American smokers are informed about the link between smoking and lung cancer, and have a good working knowledge of the disease. Participants did not feel that their race prevented them from accessing high-quality cancer care, but were concerned about the effect of socioeconomic status and insurance on this process. Our study suggests that African Americans are interested in access to quality cancer treatment and information, and that patient preferences and mistrust of clinicians may not be major factors in lung cancer treatment disparities.

Citation Information: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2010;19(10 Suppl):A14.

Racism in the chemotherapy infusion unit: a nurse's story

Shortly before his death in 1995, Kenneth B. Schwartz, a cancer patient at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), founded The Kenneth B. Schwartz Center at MGH. The Schwartz Center is a nonprofit organization dedicated to supporting and advancing compassionate health care delivery that provides hope to the patient and support to caregivers, and encourages the healing process. The Center sponsors the Schwartz Center Rounds, a monthly multidisciplinary forum where caregivers reflect on important psychosocial issues faced by patients, their families, and their caregivers, and gain insight and support from fellow staff members. In this article a nurse relates her experience as caregiver for a patient who made repeated racially motivated comments. She reflects on her response and the support she received from her colleagues.

Similar outcomes between African American and non-African American patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung carcinoma: report from the Cancer and Leukemia Group B

PURPOSE

Among patients with small-cell lung carcinoma, African Americans have lower survival rates than non-African Americans. We investigated whether the disparity in survival would persist when patients were treated with similar therapies (ie, phase II/III Cancer and Leukemia Group B [CALGB] trials).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We assessed 995 patients (928 non-African American and 67 African American) receiving chemotherapy in CALGB studies for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Clinical and demographic characteristics, treatment received, and survival data were obtained from the CALGB database. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the effect of race/ethnicity on survival after adjustment for other known prognostic factors. All statistical tests were two sided.

RESULTS

The unadjusted survival distribution of African American patients was not significantly different from that of non-African American patients; median survival was 11.5 months (95% CI, 9.4 to 13.4 months) for African American patients versus 9.9 months (95% CI, 9.6 to 10.3 months) for non-African American patients. Multivariable adjustment for the effect of treatment arm, histology, and metastatic site at presentation did not alter the outcome for African American patients. Survival was similar even though African American patients were more likely to have a poorer performance status, present with significant weight loss, and be Medicaid recipients (20% v 6%), which is an indicator of lower socioeconomic status.

CONCLUSION

African American patients tended to present with prognostic features associated with a worse survival. However, when offered equivalent therapy, the outcome for African American patients was the same as that observed for non-African American patients.

Changes in the vertical size of a three-dimensional object drawn in weightlessness by astronauts

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of weightlessness on mental representation of spatial cues. Two astronauts drew two groups of three-dimensional cubes with their eyes closed, one on Earth (preflight) and the other under weightless conditions during a 7-day orbital flight (inflight). Differences in the average height of the two groups of cubes were observed. The ratio of average length of the horizontal vs. the vertical lines of the inflight cubes increased significantly compared to that of the preflight cubes. The disappearance of the gravitational reference system, which determines on Earth the vertical direction, seems to influence the internal representation of the vertical dimension, (i. e. the height) of a three-dimensional object.

Postural reactions induced by vertical motion of visual scenes and the effects of weightlessness

Postural reactions induced by vertical optokinetic stimulation were recorded for 5 subjects in a ground-based study, and for one astronaut before, during, and after a 25-day spaceflight. On the ground, the amplitude of visually-induced postural reactions generally increased with stimulus velocity and saturated around 60 degrees/s, with an angle of body tilt which never exceeded 2-3 degrees. For velocities higher than 20 degrees/s, backward body tilt during upgoing optokinetic stimulation was larger than forward body tilt during downgoing stimulation. In weightlessness, the angle of body tilt was reduced compared to ground values, but after the flight the postural reactions were larger than before the flight. If the limited angle of body tilt on Earth is due to an inhibition from the graviceptive inputs which do not confirm the visual inputs, the larger angle of tilt might reflect that this inhibition was less effective after spaceflight. This ineffectiveness might reflect a confusion between body tilt and translation as the result of adaptation to weightlessness.

Development and evaluation of a spine biopsy simulator

A spine biopsy simulator is being developed to 1) train surgeons on the current method for CT-directed needle biopsy and 2) provide a testbed for developing new image-guided and robot-assist methodologies. A task analysis and function allocation assessment provide the needed information for the first stage of the simulator development and evaluation.

Design, biochemical, biophysical and biological properties of cooperative antisense oligonucleotides

Short oligonucleotides that can bind to adjacent sites on target mRNA sequences are designed and evaluated for their binding affinity and biological activity. Sequence-specific binding of short tandem oligonucleotides is compared with a full-length single oligonucleotide (21mer) that binds to the same target sequence. Two short oligonucleotides that bind without a base separation between their binding sites on the target bind cooperatively, while oligonucleotides that have a one or two base separation between the binding oligonucleotides do not. The binding affinity of the tandem oligonucleotides is improved by extending the ends of the two oligonucleotides with complementary sequences. These extended sequences form a duplex stem when both oligonucleotides bind to the target, resulting in a stable ternary complex. RNase H studies reveal that the cooperative oligonucleotides bind to the target RNA with sequence specificity. A short oligonucleotide (9mer) with one or two mismatches does not bind at the intended site, while longer oligonucleotides (21mers) with one or two mismatches still bind to the same site, as does a perfectly matched 21mer, and evoke RNase H activity. HIV-1 inhibition studies reveal an increase in activity of the cooperative oligonucleotide combinations as the length of the dimerization domain increases.