Metastatic colorectal cancer- third line therapy and beyond

INTRODUCTION

The outcome of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has improved significantly in the last few decades. Metastatic colorectal cancer is a highly heterogenous cancer. Beyond second line chemotherapy, treatment decisions are often based on molecular testing.

METHOD

In this narrative review, we provide a comprehensive summary of data from key clinical trials and discuss how to integrate these agents into the current treatment landscape of metastatic colorectal cancer.

EXPERT OPINION

In the era of precision medicine, molecular testing plays an increasingly important role in the management of mCRC. Efforts need to be made to target treatment based on molecular test results.

OUP accepted manuscript

Background

Complementary medicines (CM) are frequently used by patients with cancer. Controversy exists over the effectiveness and risk that CM may add to conventional cancer therapy. The incidence of CM use among patients enrolled in phase III clinical trials is unknown.

Methods

Medication lists from 6 international phase III clinical trials were retrospectively reviewed to identify patients using CM. Patients had metastatic breast, colorectal, or lung cancers. Quality of life, adverse events, overall survival, and progression-free survival were compared between CM users and non-users. Baseline differences between groups were adjusted with propensity score matching groups.

Results

Seven hundred and six of 3446 patients (20.5%) used at least one CM. CM use was highest among patients with breast cancer (35.6%). CM users had more favorable baseline prognostic factors (ECOG 0-1, non-smoking status, younger age, and fewer metastases). CM use was associated with lower rates of adverse events (50% vs. 62%, P = .002) and quality of life was similar between both groups. After adjustment with propensity score matching, CM use was also associated with longer overall survival in patients with lung cancer (adjusted hazard ratio 0.80, 95%CI, 0.68-0.94, P =.0054). However, several key control variables like EGFR status were not available.

Conclusion

One in 5 patients in phase III clinical trials report using CM. CM was not associated with worse cancer-specific outcomes. However, CM users had more favorable baseline prognostic factors, and likely other confounders that may have contributed to improved outcomes observed in the lung cohort. Physicians should monitor for CM use and potential interactions with clinical trial drugs.

Regorafenib outcomes from the population based South Australian Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Registry

AIM

Reviewing outcomes of regorafenib use in metastatic colorectal cancer using real-world data from the South Australian Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Registry.

METHODS

A retrospective review of the characteristics and outcomes of patients who received regorafenib in the Registry up to December 2018. The registry started in February 2006.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients received regorafenib therapy since approved by the therapeutic goods administration in November 2013. The median age was 66 (range 34-82). 66% were male, 66% had stage IV disease at diagnosis, 53% had liver only involvement, whereas 13% had liver and lung disease and 6% had lung only involvement. 75% had left-sided primary. KRAS was available in 35/53 patients with 49% of them being WT. BRAF status was known in 8/53 with 25% of them having a mutated variant. MSI testing was known in 14 patients in whom 21% of them had MSI-High tumors. Prior lines of treatment received: one line 4%, two 9%, three 23%, four 26%, >four 37%. Prior biological use: bevacizumab 72%, anti-EGFR 100% (for RAS WT). Median survival from diagnosis was 3.3 years (95% CI, 2.8-3.8 years). Median survival from the start of regorafenib was 7.1 months (95% CI, 4.8-9.4 months) and the 12-month survival rate was 28%.

CONCLUSION

The survival outcome for those patients from our population-based registry who access regorafenib is in keeping with reports from large, randomized trials. Thus, clinicians can quote local real world data when discussing efficacy and access to regorafenib therapy for mCRC patients.

Patterns of care and outcomes for gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction cancer in an Australian population

BACKGROUND

A single state-wide upper gastrointestinal (GI) cancer video-linked multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting guides management and evidence-based care for all newly diagnosed upper GI cancer patients in South Australia. This study determined the patterns of care and outcomes for patients diagnosed with gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction (GOJ) cancers.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with gastric cancer and GOJ (Siewert III) cancer between June 2012 and June 2016 were included. Patient demographics, cancer stage, histology, diagnostic modalities and treatment data was analysed from a prospective database. Stage-specific survival outcomes were determined and analysed for each treatment modality.

RESULTS

The study included 218 patients and at diagnosis 132 (61%) patients had stage I-III and 86 (39%) patients had stage IV disease. One hundred and ninety-five (89%) patients had gastric cancer and 23 (11%) had GOJ cancer (Siewert III). One hundred and nine (50%) patients underwent surgery, with 92% R0 resection rate. Forty-six patients received perioperative chemotherapy and 111 (51%) patients received palliative intent treatment. Median overall survival for stage II, III and IV cancers was 57.6 (95% CI 57.6-NR), 22.8 (95% CI 20.4-43.2), and 6.0 months (95% CI 4.8-8.4) respectively (p < 0.001). Median overall survival for patients who underwent perioperative chemotherapy and surgery was not reached as compared to 44.4 months (95% CI 28.8-NR) for patients who underwent surgery alone.

CONCLUSION

Treatment outcomes for patients with gastric and GOJ cancer managed across South Australia met contemporary evidence-based practice. However, as most patients continue to present with late-stage disease, longer-term survival remains poor.

Female breast cancer treatment and survival in South Australia: Results from linked health data

Objective

We investigated treatment and survival by clinical and sociodemographic characteristics for service evaluation using linked data.

Method

Data on invasive female breast cancers (n = 13,494) from the South Australian Cancer Registry (2000–2014 diagnoses) were linked to hospital inpatient, radiotherapy and universal health insurance data. Treatments ≤12 months from diagnosis and survival were analysed, using adjusted odds ratios (aORs) from logistic regression, and adjusted sub‐hazard ratios (aSHRs) from competing risk regression.

Results and conclusion

Five‐year disease‐specific survival increased to 91% for 2010–2014. Most women had breast surgery (90%), systemic therapy (72%) and radiotherapy (60%). Less treatment applied for ages 80+ vs <50 years (aOR 0.10, 95% CI 0.05–0.20) and TNM stage IV vs stage I (aOR 0.13, 95% CI 0.08–0.22). Surgical treatment increased during the study period and strongly predicted higher survival. Compared with no surgery, aSHRs were 0.31 (95% CI 0.26–0.36) for women having breast‐conserving surgery, 0.49 (95% CI 0.41–0.57) for mastectomy and 0.42 (95% CI 0.33–0.52) when both surgery types were received. Patients aged 80+ years had lower survival and less treatment. More trial evidence is needed to optimise trade‐offs between benefits and harms in these older women. Survival differences were not found by residential remoteness and were marginal by socioeconomic status.

Curative therapy for rectal cancer

Introduction: A comprehensive trimodality approach has become the standard of care for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. However, the sequencing and duration of chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy around surgery varies between clinical studies and geographical regions. Growing evidence is also mounting for strategies such as total neoadjuvant therapy and non-operative management for carefully selected patients.Areas covered: We provide a perspective review of the current evidence and controversies in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer including the recent updates from the 2020 ASCO annual conference.Expert opinion: With ongoing advances in the management of locally advanced rectal cancer, a multidisciplinary team approach is necessary as treatments could involve multiple approaches. Chemoradiotherapy whether short or long course followed by at least 3 months of systemic chemotherapy may be the preferred option to balance local and distant disease control. Albeit the choice of doublet or triplet chemotherapy is still controversial. As total neoadjuvant treatment becomes part of the standard of care in rectal cancer, modification of the surveillance schedule is needed to detect early recurrences which may be limited by resources and availability of services.

Practical Considerations for Treating Patients With Cancer in the COVID-19 Pandemic

Cancer has become a prevalent disease, affecting millions of new patients globally each year. The COVID-19 pandemic is having far-reaching impacts around the world, causing substantial disruptions to health and health care systems that are likely to last for a prolonged period. Early data have suggested that having cancer is a significant risk factor for mortality from severe COVID-19. A diverse group of medical oncologists met to formulate detailed practical advice on systemic anticancer treatments during this crisis. In the context of broad principles, issues including risks of treatment, principles of prioritizing resources, treatment of elderly patients, and psychosocial impact are discussed. Detailed treatment advice and options are given at a tumor stream level. We must maintain care for patients with cancer as best we can and recognize that COVID-19 poses a significant competing risk for death that changes conventional treatment paradigms.

Efficacy of influenza vaccine (Fluvax) in cancer patients on treatment: a prospective single arm, open-label study

PURPOSE

Influenza virus infection has significant morbidity and mortality in patients with medical co-morbidities who are also immunosuppressed. The efficacy of the seasonal influenza vaccine has not been well studied in patients receiving chemotherapy. We assessed the efficacy of seasonal influenza vaccine in patients with non-haematological malignancy on active treatment (chemotherapy and targeted therapy).

METHODS

A prospective single arm, open label study with 53 patients with non-haematological cancers recruited during the 2011 and 2012 influenza seasons. Participants had one dose of 2011/2012 trivalent vaccine containing strains A/California/7/2009(H1N1), A/Perth/16/2009 (H3N2) and B/Brisbane/60/2008 (Fluvax) prior to or in-between treatment cycles. Haemagglutination inhibition antibody (HIA) titres in serum were measured at baseline 3, 6 and 24 weeks. Primary endpoint: seroconversion rate (SCR) at 3 weeks. Secondary endpoints: late SCR at 6 weeks. rate of sustained sero-protection titres (SPR) at 24 weeks. Seroconversion was defined as postvaccination ≥ 4-fold increase in HIA titre and sero-protection defined as a HIA ≥ 1:40.

RESULTS

The SCR at 3 weeks were 35%, 30% and 22.5% to the H1N1, H3N2 and B/Bris strains, respectively. There were no new cases of late SC at 6 weeks or 24 weeks. The SPR at 3 weeks were 72.5%, 65% and 40%, respectively, to H1N1, H3N2 and B/Bris. The SPR at 24 weeks to H1N1, H3N2 and B/Bris were 40%, 52.5% and 17.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients on various solid tumour treatments achieve sero-protection rate congruent with the general population. The sero-protection HIA titres were not sustained at 24 weeks postvaccination.

Circulating epigenetic biomarkers for detection of recurrent colorectal cancer

Background

The sensitive detection of recurrent colorectal cancer (CRC) by the measurement of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) might improve the chance of a cure. This study compared a quantitative methylated ctDNA test with carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in the setting of surveillance for recurrence.

Methods

Blood samples collected either during surveillance or within 12 months of the confirmation of recurrence were assayed for ctDNA (methylated branched‐chain amino acid transaminase 1 [BCAT1]/Ikaros family zinc‐finger 1 protein [IKZF1]) and CEA. The optimal ctDNA threshold was determined by receiver operating characteristic analysis, and the test performance for the detection of recurrence was compared with CEA (5 ng/mL threshold).

Results

The study cohort comprised 144 eligible patients and included 50 recurrence events. The sensitivity of the methylated ctDNA test for recurrence was 66.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 57.1%‐69.3%), which was significantly higher than the sensitivity of CEA (31.9%; 95% CI, 22.8%‐36.6%; P < .001). The sensitivity for resectable recurrence (n = 20) was also higher (ctDNA, 60.0%; CEA, 20.0%; P = .01). The specificity did not differ between the tests (ctDNA, 97.9%; 95% CI, 93.2%‐99.6%; CEA, 96.4%; 95% CI, 91.4%‐99.0%). When adjustments were made for other predictors of the presence of recurrence, a positive ctDNA test was an independent predictor (odds ratio, 155.7; 95% CI, 17.9‐1360.6; P < .001), whereas CEA was not (odds ratio, 2.5; 95% CI, 0.3‐20.6; P = .407).

Conclusions

The quantitative ctDNA test showed superior sensitivity in comparison with CEA without a difference in the specificity for detecting recurrent CRC. Longitudinal studies are warranted to further assess the utility (specifically the survival benefit) of methylated BCAT1/IKZF1 ctDNA in the surveillance of patients with CRC.

An optimal positivity threshold has been determined for an epigenetic circulating tumor DNA panel of biomarkers (methylated BCAT1 and IKZF1), and it has been applied to investigating the panel's utility in the detection of colorectal cancer recurrence. The sensitivity of the circulating tumor DNA test is superior to that of the clinically used carcinoembryonic antigen test for all recurrences (66% vs 32%) and those considered curable (60% vs 20%), with both tests having a very high specificity (98% vs 96%).

Pre-diagnostic colonoscopies reduce cancer mortality - results from linked population-based data in South Australia

Background

To investigate the association between pre-diagnostic colonoscopy and colorectal cancer mortality in South Australia.

Methods

Colonoscopy histories were obtained for colorectal cancer patients diagnosed in 2003–2013 using linked Medical Benefits Schedule (MBS) claims, hospital-inpatient and cancer-registry data. Colonoscopy histories included the year of colonoscopy, numbers of examinations, and the time from first colonoscopy to diagnosis. Histories of multiple exposures to colonoscopies, and exposures of greater than a year from initial colonoscopy to diagnosis, were regarded as indicators of screening or surveillance activity. Colonoscopies occurring within one year of diagnosis were regarded as more likely to be a response to cancer symptoms than those occurring > 1 year before diagnosis. Associations between colonoscopy history and post-diagnostic survival were analysed using sub-hazard ratios (SHRs) from competing risk regression adjusted for socio-demographic and cancer characteristics.

Results

Having pre-diagnostic colonoscopy was associated with an unadjusted reduction in risk of colorectal cancer death of 17% (SHR: 0.83, 95% CI 0.78–0.89). After adjusting for time period and sociodemographic characteristics, the risk of colorectal cancer death reduced by 17% for one pre-diagnostic colonoscopy examination; 27% for two pre-diagnostic colonoscopy examinations; and 45% for three or more pre-diagnostic colonoscopy examinations. Those with a time of over one year from first colonoscopy in the study window to diagnosis, when compared with less than one year, had a 17% lower risk of colorectal cancer death in this adjusted analysis. These reductions were substantially reduced or eliminated when also adjusting for less advanced stage.

Conclusions

Pre-diagnostic colonoscopy, and more so, multiple colonoscopies and first colonoscopy occurring over one year from initial colonoscopy to diagnosis, were associated with longer survival post diagnosis. This was largely explained by less advanced cancer stage at the time of diagnosis.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-019-6092-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Cancer outcomes in patients requiring immunosuppression in addition to corticosteroids for immune-related adverse events after immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy

AIM

To examine the cancer-specific outcomes for patients who experience immune-related adverse events requiring immunosuppression beyond corticosteroids.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective case series of patients between January 1, 2009 and April 1, 2018, across three metropolitan hospitals in Adelaide, South Australia. Eligible patients were identified from pharmacy records. Patients with a solid organ malignancy had discontinued checkpoint inhibitor therapy due to toxicity, and required immunosuppression in addition to corticosteroids to treat any immune-related adverse event.

RESULTS

From 3860 patient dispensation records of immunosuppressive medications, 19 eligible patients were identified. Eight received a CTLA-4 inhibitor, four a PD-1 inhibitor, five combination immunotherapy, and two remained blinded. Sixteen patients had melanoma and three had non-small cell lung cancer. Median time to treatment failure was 8.7 months, and median overall survival was 9.4 months. Of those evaluable, the objective response rate was 35%, while 53% had progressive disease. Four patients died due to complications of their irAE, while six died from progressive disease.

CONCLUSION

Patients who received immunosuppression for checkpoint inhibitor therapy toxicity had variable outcomes. This in part reflects a heterogeneous population, and the evolution of irAE management over time. Several patients continued to derive a benefit after cessation of therapy despite the use of immunosuppressive medications; conversely, four died as a direct consequence of their irAE. Physicians should promptly introduce immunosuppressive therapy in patients not responding to corticosteroids to mitigate the risk of life-threatening adverse events, given that current evidence does not clearly demonstrate a detriment to cancer-specific outcomes.

Hypertension as a predictor of advanced colorectal cancer outcome and cetuximab treatment response

Background

Adrenergic receptor stimulation is involved in the development of hypertension (htn) and has been implicated in cancer progression and dissemination of metastases in various tumours, including colon cancer. Adrenergic antagonists such as beta-blockers (bbs) demonstrate inhibition of invasion and migration in colon cancer cell lines and have been associated with decreased mortality in colorectal cancer (crc). We examined the association of baseline htn and bb use with overall (os) and progression-free survival (pfs) in patients with pretreated, chemotherapy refractory, metastatic crc (mcrc). We also examined baseline htn as a predictor of cetuximab efficacy.

Methods

Using data from the Canadian Cancer Trials Group co.17 study [cetuximab vs. best supportive care (bsc)], we coded baseline htn and use of anti-htn medications, including bbs, for 572 patients. The chi-square test was used to assess the associations between those variables and baseline characteristics. Cox regression models were used for univariate and multivariate analyses of os and pfs by htn diagnosis and bb use.

Results

Baseline htn, bb use, and anti-htn medication use were not found to be prognostic for improved os. Baseline htn and bb use were not significant predictors of cetuximab benefit.

Conclusions

In chemorefractory mcrc, neither baseline htn nor bb use is a significant prognostic factor. Baseline htn and bb use are not predictive of cetuximab benefit. Further investigation to determine whether baseline htn or bb use have a similarly insignificant impact on prognosis in patients receiving earlier lines of treatment remains warranted.

Phase IB/II Study of Second-Line Therapy with Panitumumab, Irinotecan, and Everolimus (PIE) in KRAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Purpose: Inhibition of mTOR in addition to EGFR may overcome resistance to EGFR inhibitors in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This phase Ib/II study evaluated the safety and efficacy of the combination of irinotecan, panitumumab, and everolimus.Patients and Methods: Patients with KRAS exon 2 wild-type (WT) mCRC following failure of fluoropyrimidine-based therapy received i.v. irinotecan and panitumumab every 2 weeks, and everolimus orally throughout a 14-day cycle. The primary endpoint of the phase II study was response rate (RR). Secondary survival outcomes were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and results were analyzed as intention to treat. A preplanned exploratory biomarker analysis was performed.Results: Forty-nine patients were enrolled. Dose level 1 (irinotecan 200 mg/m², panitumumab 6 mg/kg, and everolimus 5 mg alternate day) was declared the MTD with no dose-limiting toxicities in six patients. Forty patients were treated at dose level 1: median age, 60 years (37-76); 65% male; 45% and 52.5%, respectively, with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group values of 0/1. Median dose intensity was 85%. Grade 3 toxicities were diarrhea (23%), mucositis (18%), rash (13%), fatigue (8%), dehydration (5%), neutropenia (20%), febrile neutropenia (8%), hypomagnesemia (20%), and hypokalemia (8%). Grade 4 toxicities were hypomagnesemia (5%) and neutropenia (3%). RR was 48%, and stable disease was 43%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.6 months, and median overall survival (OS) was 10.8 months. Twenty-five patients were RAS/RAF WT and had an RR of 60%, median PFS of 6.4 months, and OS of 11.8 months.Conclusions: The toxicity of the panitumumab, irinotecan, and everolimus regimen is as expected and manageable. The RR of 60% in all RAS/RAF WT supports further study of this combination. Clin Cancer Res; 24(16); 3838-44. ©2018 AACR.

Use of guideline-recommended adjuvant therapies and survival outcomes for people with colorectal cancer at tertiary referral hospitals in South Australia

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

Adjuvant care for colorectal cancer (CRC) has increased over the past 3 decades in South Australia (SA) in accordance with national treatment guidelines. This study explores the (1) receipt of adjuvant therapy for CRC in SA as related to national guideline recommendations, with a focus on stage C colon and stage B and C rectal cancer; (2) timing of these adjuvant therapies in relation to surgery; and (3) comparative survival outcomes.

METHODS

Data from the SA Clinical Cancer Registry from 4 tertiary referral hospitals for 2000 to 2010 were examined. Patterns of care were compared with treatment guidelines using multivariable logistic regression. Disease-specific survivals were calculated by treatment pathway.

RESULTS

Four hundred forty-three (60%) patients with stage C colon cancer and 363 (46%) with stage B and C rectal cancer received guideline-recommended care. While an overall increase in proportion receiving adjuvant care was not evident across the study period, the proportion having neoadjuvant care increased substantially. Older age was an independent predictor of not receiving adjuvant care. Patients with stage C colon cancer who received recommended adjuvant care had a higher 5-year survival than those not receiving this care, ie, 71.2% vs 53.2%. Similarly adjuvant therapy was associated with better outcomes for stage C rectal cancers. The median time for receiving adjuvant care was 8 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

Survival was better for stage C CRC treated according to guidelines. Adjuvant care should be provided except where clear contraindications present. Other possible contributors to guideline adherence warranting additional investigation include co-morbidity status, multidisciplinary team involvement, and choice.

The impact of primary tumour resection and sidedness in patients with synchronous metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Findings from the South Australian Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Registry (SAMCRC)

739

Background: The benefit of primary tumour resection (PTR) in patients with synchronous mCRC is not clear. The influence of tumour location on PTR benefit is also uncertain. Methods: SAMCRC is a population based registry collating data from all patients in South Australia diagnosed with mCRC from February 2006. We examined outcomes according to whether the primary colorectal tumour was excised within 3 months of diagnosis or remained in situ; we also examined whether outcomes were affected by tumour side (right v left). Registry data was included for patients with synchronous metastic adenocarcinoma from colon or rectum. Exclusion criteria included metastasectomy, tumour resection within 7 days or death within 3 months of mCRC diagnosis. Kaplan Meier analysis was used for Survival. Tumour sidedness and PTR were analysed with a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. Survival was measured from the landmark date (3 months from date of diagnosis). Results: 2575 patients with synchronous mCRC have entered the database, of which 1869 patients were eligible for the PTR analysis. 50.2% (n = 938) underwent PTR. 481 patients (51.3%) of the PTR analysis group had left-sided primary tumours whilst 436 had right sided tumours (46.5%) which was significant (p < 0.001). 63% of the PTR cohort were male (n = 1006). Site and age metastases were included in the multivariate analysis. PTR was associated with improved survival from landmark compared to no resection (15.0 mo vs 11.2 mo, 95% CI 15.0 – 16.3 vs 11.2 – 12.3, p = 0.031). In the entire synchronous mCRC group, left-sided tumours (62.1%) had a longer median survival (17.8 mo vs 10.4 mo, 95% CI 15.7 – 19.5 vs 10.4 – 11.7 p = < 0.001). An interaction test was performed for sidedness and was not significant. Conclusions: PTR was associated was associated with improvement in survival in this large population based registry. This finding did not differ signifcantly between right and left sided tumours. Survival was superior for patients with left sided tumours, in keeping with established data. Criteria for selection of patients with mCRC who benefit from PTR need to be defined.

Female breast cancer management and survival: The experience of major public hospitals in South Australia over 3 decades-trends by age and in the elderly

BACKGROUND

Clinical registry data from major South Australian public hospitals were used to investigate trends in invasive breast-cancer treatment and survival by age.

METHODS

Disease-specific survival was calculated for the 1980 to 2013 diagnostic period using Kaplan-Meier product-limit estimates, with a censoring of live cases on December 31, 2014. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to examine differences in survival by age and tumour characteristic. First-round treatments following diagnosis were analysed, using multiple logistic regression to adjust for confounding.

RESULTS

Five-year survival increased from 75% in the 1980s to 87% in 2000 to 2013, consistent with national trends, and with increases occurring irrespective of age. There was an increased use of breast conserving surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and hormone treatments. Five-year survival was lower for women aged 80+ years, increasing from 65% in the 1980s to 74% in 2000 to 2013. Lower survival in these older women persisted after adjusting for TNM stage, other clinical variables, and diagnostic year, without evidence of a reduced disparity over time. Older women were less likely to have surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy throughout 1980 to 2013. By comparison, their use of hormone therapy was elevated. The adjusted relative odds of mastectomy (as opposed to breast conserving surgery) were lower for the 80+ year age range.

CONCLUSIONS

Breast-cancer survival increases applied to all ages, including 80+ years, but poorer outcomes persisted in this older group and the gap did not reduce. A key question is whether the best trade-off now exists between optimally therapeutic cancer treatment and accommodations for frailty and co-morbidity in the aged, or whether opportunities exist for better trade-offs and better survival. Local registry data are important for describing local service activity and outcomes by age for local service providers, health administrations and consumer groups; monitoring disparities; and indicating effects of local initiatives.

Assessing impact of organised breast screening across small residential areas-development and internal validation of a prediction model

Monitoring screening mammography effects in small areas is often limited by small numbers of deaths and delayed effects. We developed a risk score for breast cancer death to circumvent these limitations. Screening, if effective, would increase post-diagnostic survivals through lead-time and related effects, as well as mortality reductions. Linked cancer and BreastScreen data at four hospitals (n = 2,039) were used to investigate whether screened cases had higher recorded survivals in 13 small areas, using breast cancer deaths as the outcome (M1), and a risk of death score derived from TNM stage, grade, histology type, hormone receptor status, and related variables (M2). M1 indicated lower risk of death in screened cases in 12 of the 13 areas, achieving statistical significance (p < .05) in 5. M2 indicated lower risk scores in screened cases in all 13 areas, achieving statistical significance in 12. For cases recently screened at diagnosis (<6 months), statistically significant reductions applied in 8 areas (M1) and all 13 areas (M2). Screening effects are more detectable in small areas using these risk scores than death itself as the outcome variable. An added advantage is the application of risk scores for providing a marker of screening effect soon after diagnosis.

Pre-treatment serum lactate dehydrogenase as a biomarker in small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Small cell lung cancer is a rapidly progressive disease with high fatality. No sensitive and specific biomarker to assist in managing this disease exists currently.

AIM

Role of pretreatment serum lactate dehydrogenase as a biomarker in small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

A hospital-based cancer registry was used to identify eligible patients from 1999 to 2009. Demographic data, lactate dehydrogenase level and clinical outcome of patients were collected for analysis.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty-eight patients were identified: 61% (n = 103) males and 39% (n = 65) females. Majority had extensive stage (67%). High lactate dehydrogenase (≥230 U/L) was present in 60.4% (n = 75); mean reading 260 U/L (range 148-898 U/L) in limited stage and 470 U/L (range 116-5462 U/L) in extensive stage. Extensive stage patients with high lactate dehydrogenase had lower treatment response rate compared to those with normal lactate dehydrogenase (39% vs 79%, P = 0.002); no difference in treatment response was seen among patients with limited stage. High lactate dehydrogenase conferred a worse survival; mean overall survivals in limited and extensive stage were 8.0 and 5.2 months, respectively, in patients with elevated lactate dehydrogenase. Those with normal lactate dehydrogenase had an overall survival of 16.5 and 8.2 months, respectively. The association remained significant after adjustment for age, sex and treatment (HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.16-2.80, P = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

High pretreatment lactate dehydrogenase is a prognostic marker of survival in both stages of small cell lung cancer. It is also a predictive marker of response to therapy in extensive stage. Larger prospective studies to validate our findings would be beneficial.

Brain metastasis in advanced colorectal cancer: results from the South Australian metastatic colorectal cancer (SAmCRC) registry

Objective:

Brain metastasis is considered rare in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC); thus, surveillance imaging does not routinely include the brain. The reported incidence of brain metastases ranges from 0.6% to 3.2%.

Methods:

The South Australian mCRC Registry (SAmCRC) was analyzed to assess the number of patients presenting with brain metastasis during their lifetime. Due to small numbers, a descriptive analysis is presented.

Results:

Only 59 patients of 4,100 on the registry at the time of analysis had developed brain metastasis (1.4%). The clinical characteristics of those with brain metastasis were as follows: the median age was 65.3 years and 51% were female. Where the V-Ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) mutation status of the tumor was known, the majority harbored a KRAS mutation (55%); 31 (53%) underwent craniotomy and 55 (93%) underwent whole-brain radiotherapy. The median survival time from diagnosis of brain metastasis was 4.2 months (95% confidence interval 2.9–5.5). Patients who underwent craniotomy and radiotherapy had superior survival compared to those who underwent whole-brain radiotherapy (8.5 months vs. 2.2 months, respectively). Data from the SAmCRC (a population-based registry) confirm that brain metastases are rare and the median time to development is approximately 2 years.

Conclusions:

Brain metastasis is a rare outcome in advanced CRC. Patients within the registry tended to be female, young in age, and harbored with higher rates of KRAS mutations. Whether routine surveillance brain scanning should be considered remains controversial given the relative rarity of developing brain metastases in mCRC and ultimately, most patients with central nervous system involvement die from their extracranial disease.

BRAF Mutation Testing and Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in the Community Setting: Is There an Urgent Need for More Education?

BACKGROUND

Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with BRAF mutation (BRAF MT) generally have a poorer prognosis. BRAF MT may also have implications for treatment strategy. Despite this, inclusion of BRAF in routine molecular testing varies. Here we report the frequency of BRAF reporting in the South Australian (SA) mCRC registry reflecting community practice, together with the survival outcomes based on mutation status.

METHODS

The SA population-based mCRC registry was analysed to assess the number of patients where a BRAF MT result was available. The patient characteristics are reported and overall survival was analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Of the 3639 patients who have been entered in the registry, only 6.2% (227) have BRAF MT results available. Of the patients tested, the BRAF MT rate is 12.7%. The mutation rate was highest in rightsided primary; right colon 23 versus left colon 8.9% and rectum 7%. There was no significant difference in median age or male/female proportion. The median overall survival (mOS) for BRAF MT versus wild-type (WT) patients is 14.0 versus 32.9 months (p = 0.003). For patients who have chemotherapy (plus or minus surgery) the mOS is 14.6 months BRAF MT versus 36.1 months (p ≤ 0.001) WT. Liver or lung resection was performed on only 8% of the BRAF MT group versus 26.5% of the WT group.

CONCLUSION

Results in a population setting confirm our understanding that BRAF MT is more frequently right sided and of lower frequency in rectal cancer. Survival is lower for patients with mCRC that have BRAF MT, regardless of the therapy. BRAF testing is currently performed infrequently in an Australian setting despite its importance as a significant prognostic factor, and the implications for alternate therapeutic approaches.

Selective internal radiation therapy for liver metastases from colorectal cancer

Liver metastases are often the dominant site of metastatic disease in colorectal cancer. Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) involves embolising radiolabeled spheres (SIR-Spheres) into the arterial supply of the liver. This review assesses the effectiveness and toxicity of SIRT in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer liver metastasis when given alone or with systemic or regional hepatic artery chemotherapy. We reviewed only randomised controlled trials comparing SIRT and chemotherapy (systemic and/or regional) with chemotherapy alone, or comparing SIRT alone with best supportive care. Only four randomized trials were identified. Due to heterogeneity of the patients and treatments received it was not possible to perform a formal meta-analysis, therefore this is a descriptive analysis only. All studies included patients with either liver only or liver dominant metastatic colorectal cancer. Two trials compared SIRT alone and SIRT with chemotherapy first line. The first with only 21 patients revealed a significant improvement in PFS and median survival with SIRT. The larger second study SIRFLOX of 530 patients comparing SIRT and current standard first line FOLFOX chemotherapy (+/- bevacizumab) with standard FOLFOX+/-bevacizumab alone. There was no improvement in overall PFS with addition of SIRT. In chemotherapy refractory patients SIRT and systemic chemotherapy (fluorouracil) improved progression free survival but not overall survival. A final study (63 patients) compared SIRT and regional chemotherapy (floxuridine) with regional chemotherapy alone in first line showed no significant difference in progression free survival and median survival. There remains a lack of evidence that SIRT improves survival or quality of life in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. The overall survival results from SIRFLOX combined with FOXFIRE and FOXFIRE Global are awaited.

Is Survival for Patients with Resectable Lung Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Comparable to Those with Resectable Liver Disease? Results from the South Australian Metastatic Colorectal Registry

BACKGROUND

Hepatic resection for colorectal (CRC) metastasis is considered a standard of care. Resection of metastasis isolated to lung also is considered potentially curable, although there is still some variation in recommendations. We explore outcomes for patients undergoing lung resection for mCRC, with the liver resection group as the comparator.

METHODS

South Australian (SA) metastatic CRC registry data were analysed to assess patient characteristics and survival outcomes for patients suitable for lung or liver resection.

RESULTS

A total of 3241 patients are registered on the database to December 2014. One hundred two (3.1 %) patients were able to undergo a lung resection compared with 420 (12.9 %) who had a liver resection. Of the lung resection patients, 62 (61 %) presented with lung disease only, 21 % initially presented with liver disease only, 11 % had both lung and liver, and 7 % had brain or pelvic disease resection. Of these patients, 79 % went straight to surgery without any neoadjuvant treatment and 34 % had lung resection as the only intervention. Chemotherapy for metastatic disease was given more often to liver resection patients: 76.9 versus 53.9 %, p = 0.17. Median overall survival is 5.6 years for liver resection and has not been reached for lung resection (hazard ratio 0.82, 95 % confidence interval 0.54-1.24, p = 0.33).

CONCLUSIONS

Lung resection was undertaken in 3.1 % of patients with mCRC in our registry. These data provide further support for long-term survival after lung resection in mCRC, survival that is at least comparable to those who undergo resection for liver metastasis in mCRC.

A Pilot Study of Self-Management-based Nutrition and Physical Activity Intervention in Cancer Survivors

Exercise and a healthy diet are beneficial after cancer, but are not uniformly adopted by cancer survivors. This study reports on the feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of a self-management-based nutrition and exercise intervention for Australian cancer survivors. Adult survivors (n  =  25) during curative chemotherapy (stratum 1[S1]; n  =  11) or post-treatment (stratum 2 [S2]; n  =  14) were recruited prospectively from a single center. The Flinders Living Well Self-Management Program™ (FLW Program) was utilized to establish patient-led nutrition and exercise goals and develop a tailored 12-wk intervention plan. Fortnightly reviews occurred with assessments at baseline, 6 and 12 wk. A recruitment and retention rate of 38% and 84% were observed. Both strata maintained total skeletal muscle mass. Small reductions in body mass index, hip circumference, and percentage body fat, and small increases in hand grip strength and exercise capacity among subjects in both strata were observed. No significant differences were observed between strata; however, significant increases in exercise capacity and global health status for S2 were observed from baseline to 12 wk. FLW Program is a feasible mode of delivering nutrition and exercise intervention to cancer survivors and it appears that there are no barriers to implementing this program early during chemotherapy. Hence, the additive effect of gains achieved over a longer duration is promising and this should be explored in randomized controlled trials adequately powered to observe clinically and statistically significant improvements in relevant outcomes.

Sociodemographic disparities in survival from colorectal cancer in South Australia: a population-wide data linkage study

BACKGROUND

Inequalities in survival from colorectal cancer (CRC) across socioeconomic groups and by area of residence have been described in various health care settings. Few population-wide datasets which include clinical and treatment information are available in Australia to investigate disparities. This study examines socio-demographic differences in survival for CRC patients in South Australia (SA), using a population-wide database derived via linkage of administrative and surveillance datasets.

METHODS

The study population comprised all cases of CRC diagnosed in 2003-2008 among SA residents aged 50-79 yrs in the SA Central Cancer Registry. Measures of socioeconomic status (area level), geographical remoteness, clinical characteristics, comorbid conditions, treatments and outcomes were derived through record linkage of central cancer registry, hospital-based clinical registries, hospital separations, and radiotherapy services data sources. Socio-demographic disparities in CRC survival were examined using competing risk regression analysis.

RESULTS

Four thousand six hundred and forty one eligible cases were followed for an average of 4.7 yrs, during which time 1525 died from CRC and 416 died from other causes. Results of competing risk regression indicated higher risk of CRC death with higher grade (HR high v low =2.25, 95% CI 1.32-3.84), later stage (HR C v A = 7.74, 95% CI 5.75-10.4), severe comorbidity (HR severe v none =1.21, 95% CI 1.02-1.44) and receiving radiotherapy (HR = 1.41, 95% CI 1.18-1.68). Patients from the most socioeconomically advantaged areas had significantly better outcomes than those from the least advantaged areas (HR =0.75, 95% 0.62-0.91). Patients residing in remote locations had significantly worse outcomes than metropolitan residents, though this was only evident for stages A-C (HR = 1.35, 95 % CI 1.01-1.80). These disparities were not explained by differences in stage at diagnosis between socioeconomic groups or area of residence. Nor were they explained by differences in patient factors, other tumour characteristics, comorbidity, or treatment modalities.

CONCLUSIONS

Socio-economic and regional disparities in survival following CRC are evident in SA, despite having a universal health care system. Of particular concern is the poorer survival for patients from remote areas with potentially curable CRC. Reasons for these disparities require further exploration to identify factors that can be addressed to improve outcomes.

Equivalence of outcomes for rural and metropolitan patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in South Australia

OBJECTIVE

To compare the management and outcome of rural and metropolitan patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in South Australia.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PATIENTS

Retrospective cohort study of patients with mCRC submitted to the South Australian mCRC registry between 2 February 2006 and a cut-off date of 28 May 2012.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Differences in oncological and surgical management and overall survival (calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method) between city and rural patients.

RESULTS

Of 2289 patients, 624 (27.3%) were rural. There was a higher proportion of male patients in the rural cohort, but other patient characteristics did not significantly differ between the cohorts. Equivalent rates of chemotherapy administration between city and rural patients were observed across each line of treatment (first line: 56.0% v 58.3%, P = 0.32; second line: 23.3% v 22.5%, P = 0.78; and third line: 10.1% v 9.3%, P = 0.69). A higher proportion of city patients received combination chemotherapy in the first-line setting (67.4% v 59.9%; P = 0.01). When an oxaliplatin combination was prescribed, oral capecitabine was used more frequently in rural patients (22.9% v 8.4%; P < 0.001). No significant difference was seen in rates of hepatic resection or other non-chemotherapy treatments between cohorts. Median overall survival was equivalent between city and rural patients (14.6 v 14.9 months, P = 0.18).

CONCLUSION

Patterns of chemotherapy and surgical management of rural patients with mCRC in SA are equivalent to their metropolitan counterparts and lead to comparable overall survival. The centralised model of oncological care in SA may ensure rural patients gain access to optimal care.

Does the primary site of colorectal cancer impact outcomes for patients with metastatic disease?

BACKGROUND

Previous reports have described differences in biology and outcome for colorectal cancer based on whether the primary is right or left sided. Further division by right, left, and rectum or even exact primary site has also been explored. Possible differences in response to biological agents have also been reported based on side of primary lesion.

METHODS

We explored the South Australian registry for metastatic colorectal cancer to assess if there were any differences in patient characteristics, prognostic markers, and treatment received and outcomes based on whether the primary was right or left sided. We also explored if differences exist based on left colon and rectum and by exact primary site.

RESULTS

Two thousand nine hundred seventy-two patients were analyzed. Thirty-five percent had a right-sided primary. The median overall survival for the entire group right versus left was 9.6 versus 20.3 months (P < .001). Multivariate analysis confirmed side of primary as an independent prognostic factor. For the group that had active therapy, defined as chemotherapy (± metastasis resection), median overall survival was right, 18.2 months; and left, 29.4 months (P < .001). Importantly, we found no suggestion of major differences if left side was divided by left colon and rectum, and trends by individual site still supported a left and right division.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with a right-sided primary have more negative prognostic factors and indeed have inferior outcomes compared with those with a left-sided primary. Our data with further breakdown by exact site still favor a simple left-versus-right division moving forward for metastatic colorectal cancer.

Optimal duration and timing of adjuvant chemotherapy after definitive surgery for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: ongoing lessons from the ESPAC-3 study

PURPOSE

Adjuvant chemotherapy improves patient survival rates after resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma, but the optimal duration and time to initiate chemotherapy is unknown.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma treated within the international, phase III, European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer-3 (version 2) study were included if they had been randomly assigned to chemotherapy. Overall survival analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis, retaining patients in their randomized groups, and adjusting the overall treatment effect by known prognostic variables as well as the start time of chemotherapy.

RESULTS

There were 985 patients, of whom 486 (49%) received gemcitabine and 499 (51%) received fluorouracil; 675 patients (68%) completed all six cycles of chemotherapy (full course) and 293 patients (30%) completed one to five cycles. Lymph node involvement, resection margins status, tumor differentiation, and completion of therapy were all shown by multivariable Cox regression to be independent survival factors. Overall survival favored patients who completed the full six courses of treatment versus those who did not (hazard ratio [HR], 0.516; 95% CI, 0.443 to 0.601; P < .001). Time to starting chemotherapy did not influence overall survival rates for the full study population (HR, 0.985; 95% CI, 0.956 to 1.015). Chemotherapy start time was an important survival factor only for the subgroup of patients who did not complete therapy, in favor of later treatment (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Completion of all six cycles of planned adjuvant chemotherapy rather than early initiation was an independent prognostic factor after resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. There seems to be no difference in outcome if chemotherapy is delayed up to 12 weeks, thus allowing adequate time for postoperative recovery.

Curative resection and reconstruction of the inferior vena cava after extensive infiltration with low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma

Endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) rarely infiltrates the great vessels. We report a successful surgical resection of the inferior vena cava (IVC) after extensive infiltration with metastatic low-grade ESS. A case of presumed recurrence of low-grade ESS demonstrated complete IVC occlusion from tumour thrombus with extensive local disease. Radical resection of the tumour and caval reconstruction was performed. The IVC graft was thrombosed at short-term follow-up. Curative resection of extensive caval infiltration with metastatic low-grade ESS can be achieved. Caval reconstructive procedures may be redundant in the presence of an adequate collateral circulation.