1
|
Hahn C, Ödén J, Dasu A, Vestergaard A, Fuglsang Jensen M, Sokol O, Pardi C, Bourhaleb F, Leite A, de Marzi L, Smith E, Aitkenhead A, Rose C, Merchant M, Kirkby K, Grzanka L, Pawelke J, Lühr A. Towards harmonizing clinical linear energy transfer (LET) reporting in proton radiotherapy: a European multi-centric study. Acta Oncol 2022; 61:206-214. [PMID: 34686122 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2021.1992007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2021] [Accepted: 10/06/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical data suggest that the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) in proton therapy (PT) varies with linear energy transfer (LET). However, LET calculations are neither standardized nor available in clinical routine. Here, the status of LET calculations among European PT institutions and their comparability are assessed. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eight European PT institutions used suitable treatment planning systems with their center-specific beam model to create treatment plans in a water phantom covering different field arrangements and fulfilling commonly agreed dose objectives. They employed their locally established LET simulation environments and procedures to determine the corresponding LET distributions. Dose distributions D1.1 and DRBE assuming constant and variable RBE, respectively, and LET were compared among the institutions. Inter-center variability was assessed based on dose- and LET-volume-histogram parameters. RESULTS Treatment plans from six institutions fulfilled all clinical goals and were eligible for common analysis. D1.1 distributions in the target volume were comparable among PT institutions. However, corresponding LET values varied substantially between institutions for all field arrangements, primarily due to differences in LET averaging technique and considered secondary particle spectra. Consequently, DRBE using non-harmonized LET calculations increased inter-center dose variations substantially compared to D1.1 and significantly in mean dose to the target volume of perpendicular and opposing field arrangements (p < 0.05). Harmonizing LET reporting (dose-averaging, all protons, LET to water or to unit density tissue) reduced the inter-center variability in LET to the order of 10-15% within and outside the target volume for all beam arrangements. Consequentially, inter-institutional variability in DRBE decreased to that observed for D1.1. CONCLUSION Harmonizing the reported LET among PT centers is feasible and allows for consistent multi-centric analysis and reporting of tumor control and toxicity in view of a variable RBE. It may serve as basis for harmonized variable RBE dose prescription in PT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Hahn
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Medical Physics and Radiotherapy, Department of Physics, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Jakob Ödén
- RaySearch Laboratories AB, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Alexandru Dasu
- The Skandion Clinic, Uppsala, Sweden
- Medical Radiation Sciences, Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Anne Vestergaard
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Olga Sokol
- GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Claudia Pardi
- I-SEE (Internet-Simulation Evaluation Envision), Torino, Italy
| | - Faiza Bourhaleb
- I-SEE (Internet-Simulation Evaluation Envision), Torino, Italy
| | - Amélia Leite
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy Centre, Centre Universitaire, Orsay, France
| | - Ludovic de Marzi
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy Centre, Centre Universitaire, Orsay, France
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, Inserm LITO, Orsay, France
| | - Edward Smith
- Christie Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, UK
| | - Adam Aitkenhead
- Christie Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, UK
| | - Christopher Rose
- Christie Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, UK
| | - Michael Merchant
- Christie Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, UK
| | - Karen Kirkby
- Christie Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, UK
| | - Leszek Grzanka
- Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, Poland
| | - Jörg Pawelke
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| | - Armin Lühr
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Medical Physics and Radiotherapy, Department of Physics, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Urbani L, Mazzoni A, Catalano G, De Simone P, Vanacore R, Pardi C, Bortoli M, Biancofiore G, Campani D, Perrone V, Mosca F, Scatena F, Filipponi F. The use of extracorporeal photopheresis for allograft rejection in liver transplant recipients. Transplant Proc 2004; 36:3068-70. [PMID: 15686696 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.10.071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Originally introduced for cutaneous T-cell lymphomas and autoimmune diseases, extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) has been proven effective to reverse allograft rejection. The aim of the present work was to show the results of a single-center experience with ECP for the treatment of biopsy-proven rejection in selected liver transplant (LT) recipients. PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective review of five LT patients (M:F=4:1; median age 51 years) undergoing ECP for biopsy-proven allograft rejection between January 1996 and December 2003. In this period 476 LT were performed on 441 patients. RESULTS The indications for LT were three cases of HCV-related cirrhosis, complicated by hepatocellular carcinoma in two; one HBV-HDV-alcoholic cirrhosis; and one fulminant HBV hepatitis. All patients received calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI)-based immunosuppression with induction using anti-IL2R monoclonal antibodies. Indications for ECP were: ductopenic rejection in one patient with HCV recurrence; steroid-resistant acute rejection in two; acute rejection in a major ABO-mismatched liver graft; and one acute rejection in a patient with a proven allergy to steroids. The median interval from LT to inception of ECP was 43 days. The median number of ECP sessions per patient was 20. During the course of ECP, two patients tested positive for CMV antigenemia, associated in one case with bacterial pneumonia. All patients tolerated ECP and there were no procedure-related complications. At a median follow-up of 7.9 months after start of ECP, neither rejection relapses nor HCV/HBV recurrences have been observed. Three patients are off ECP with complete reversal and low-dose immunosuppression. Two patients are still receiving ECP with full-dose immunosuppression: one has achieved normal liver function but ECP is indicated due to a major ABO-incompatible liver graft, while the other patient's liver functions have not yet returned to baseline values.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Urbani
- Liver Transplant Unit, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Trapanotto M, Benini F, Agosto C, Pardi C, Lazzarin P, Zacchello F. [Assessment and measurement of pain in infants and children]. Minerva Pediatr 2001; 53:107-19. [PMID: 11404732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/20/2023]
Abstract
The assessment of global pain in infants and children involves the analysis of subjective, behavioural and physiological components, beyond the psychological, familiar and environmental factors that influence and modulate the manifestation of painful symptom. Therefore, researchers and clinicians need valid and reliable instruments to obtain a correct measure of pain. Although subjective indices carry out a fundamental role in the assessment of pain (instruments adjusted to the age of the child), behavioural and physiological indices should be used when intelligence deficit or serious physical handicaps exclude such possibility. Behavioural aspects, associated and correlated to physiological changes, allow to obtain a reliable enough measure of pain. In this paper, the main instruments for measuring pain in infants and children will be described, and their advantages and disadvantages underlined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Trapanotto
- Dipartimento di Pediatria, Università degli Studi, Padua, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|