An international consensus based on the Delphi method to define failure of medical treatment in pyogenic spinal infections

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Pyogenic spinal infections (PSIs) are severe conditions with high morbidity and mortality. If medical treatment fails, patients may require surgery, but there is no consensus regarding the definition of medical treatment failure.

PURPOSE

To determine criteria for defining failure of medical treatment in PSI through an international consensus of experts.

STUDY DESIGN

A two-round basic Delphi method study.

SAMPLE

One hundred and fifty experts from 22 countries (authors or co-authors of clinical guidelines or indexed publications on the topic) were invited to participate; 33 answered both rounds defining the criteria.

OUTCOME MEASURES

A scale of 1 to 9 (1: no relevance; 9: highly relevant) applied to each criterion.

METHODS

We created an online survey with 10 criteria reported in the literature to define the failure of medical treatment in PSIs. We sent this survey via email to the experts. Agreement among the participants on relevant criteria (score ≥7) was determined. One month later, the second round of evaluations was sent. An extra criterion suggested by six responders in the first round was incorporated. The final version was reached with the criteria considered relevant and with high agreement.

RESULTS

The consensus definition is: (1) There is an uncontrolled sepsis despite broad spectrum antibiotic treatment, and (2) There is an infection relapse, following a six-week period of antibiotics with clinical and laboratory improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Our definition of failure following nonsurgical treatment of PSI can offer a standardized approach to guide clinical decision-making. Furthermore, it has the potential to enhance scientific reporting within this field.

Predicting Prolonged Hospital Stays in Elderly Patients With Hip Fractures Managed During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Chile: An Artificial Neural Networks Study

Background: Prolonged length of stay (LOS) after a hip fracture is associated with increased mortality. Purpose: We sought to create a model to predict prolonged LOS in elderly Chilean patients with hip fractures managed during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Employing an official database, we created an artificial neural network (ANN), a computational model corresponding to a subset of machine learning, to predict prolonged LOS (≥14 days) among 2686 hip fracture patients managed in 43 Chilean public hospitals during 2020. We identified 18 clinically relevant variables as potential predictors; 80% of the sample was used to train the ANN and 20% was used to test it. The performance of the ANN was evaluated via measuring its discrimination power through the area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC). Results: Of the 2686 patients, 820 (30.2%) had prolonged LOS. In the training sample (2,125 cases), the ANN correctly classified 1,532 cases (72.09%; AUC-ROC: 0.745). In the test sample (561 cases), the ANN correctly classified 401 cases (71.48%; AUC-ROC: 0.742). The most relevant variables to predict prolonged LOS were the patient’s admitting hospital (relative importance [RI]: 0.11), the patient’s geographical health service providing health care (RI: 0.11), and the patient’s surgery being conducted within 2 days of admission (RI: 0.10). Conclusions: Using national-level big data, we developed an ANN that predicted with fair accuracy prolonged LOS in elderly Chilean patients with hip fractures during the COVID-19 pandemic. The main predictors of a prolonged LOS were unrelated to the patient’s individual health and concerned administrative and organizational factors.

Inter- and intra-observer agreement using the new AOSpine sacral fracture classification, with a comparison between spine and pelvic trauma surgeons

BACKGROUND

Sacral fractures treatment frequently involves both spine and pelvic trauma surgeons; therefore, a consistent communication among surgical specialists is required. We independently assessed the new AOSpine sacral fracture classification's agreement from the perspective of spine and pelvic trauma surgeons.

METHODS

Complete computerized tomography (CT) scans of 80 patients with sacral fractures were selected and classified using the new AOSpine sacral classification system by six spine surgeons and three pelvic trauma surgeons. After four weeks, the 80 cases were presented and reassessed by the same raters in a new random sequence. The Kappa coefficient (κ) was used to measure the inter-and intra-observer agreement.

RESULTS

The inter-observer agreement considering the fracture severity types (A, B, or C) was substantial for spine surgeons (κ= 0.68 [0.63 - 0.72]) and pelvic trauma surgeons (κ= 0.74 (0.64 - 0.84). Regarding the subtypes, both groups achieved moderate agreement with κ= 0.52 (0.49 - 0.54) for spine surgeons and κ= 0.51 (0.45 - 0.57) for pelvic trauma surgeons. The intra-observer agreement considering the fracture types was substantial for spine surgeons (κ= 0.74 [0.63 - 0.75]) and almost perfect for pelvic trauma surgeons (κ= 0.84 [0.74 - 0.93]). Concerning the subtypes, both groups achieved substantial agreement with, κ= 0.61 (0.56 - 0.67) for spine surgeons and κ= 0.68 (0.62 - 0.74) for pelvic trauma surgeons.

CONCLUSION

This classification allows an adequate communication for spine surgeons and pelvic trauma surgeons at the fracture severity type, but the agreement is only moderate at the subtype level. Future prospective studies are required to evaluate whether this classification allows for treatment recommendations and establishing prognosis in patients with sacral fractures.

Periprosthetic Infections: Five Steps to Keep Moving Forward in 2021

The 2010 to 2020 decade produced remarkable advances in the understanding of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). However, the challenges that surgeons and clinical researchers will face in the coming decade are many. Among the tactics that should comprise the strategy to keep moving forward are: (1) The incorporation of value-based healthcare concepts in PJI diagnosis. (2) Personalized approaches to estimate PJI risk and prevent it. (3) The concentration of PJI cases in multidisciplinary superspecialized units of treatment. (4) The use of a uniform definition to categorize failed and successful episodes of treatment. (5) Using the best available evidence as a benchmark to guide daily bedside decision-making.

Preparation for the next COVID-19 wave: The European Hip Society and European Knee Associates recommendations

PURPOSE

To plan for the continuance of elective hip and knee arthroplasty during a resurgence or new wave of COVID-19 infections.

METHOD

A systematic review was conducted using the terms "COVID-19" or "SARS-Cov-2" and "second wave". No relevant citations were found to inform on recommendations the plan. Therefore, an expert panel of the European Hip Society and the European Knee Associates was formed to provide the recommendations.

RESULTS

Overall, the recommendations consider three phases; review of the first wave, preparation for the next wave, and during the next wave. International and national policies will drive most of the management. The recommendations focus on the preparation phase and, in particular, the actions that the individual surgeon needs to undertake to continue with, and practice, elective arthroplasty during the next wave, as well as planning their personal and their family's lives. The recommendations expect rigorous data collection during the next wave, so that a cycle of continuous improvement is created to take account of any future waves.

CONCLUSIONS

The recommendations for planning to continue elective hip and knee arthroplasty during a new phase of the SARS-Cov-2 pandemic provide a framework to reduce the risk of a complete shutdown of elective surgery. This involves engaging with hospital managers and other specialities in the planning process. Individuals have responsibilities to themselves, their colleagues, and their families, beyond the actual delivery of elective arthroplasty.

Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: The Role of Nuclear Medicine May Be Overestimated

Although the International Consensus Meeting on Periprosthetic Joint Infection's definition of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) does not include nuclear imaging as part of the diagnostic criteria, many contemporary nuclear imaging studies are reporting exceptional results in PJI diagnosis. We conducted a systematic review of studies published from 2004 to 2012 reporting the accuracy of nuclear imaging for diagnosis of PJI, utilizing a specially designed tool (QUADAS-2) for critical appraisal and investigation of bias. Our results revealed high risk of bias as well as high levels of concern regarding the clinical applicability of these tests in a majority of the studies. On the basis of our findings, we recommend that the use of nuclear imaging for diagnosis of PJI be limited to a few select cases.

Diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection in Medicare patients: multicriteria decision analysis

BACKGROUND

In the setting of finite healthcare resources, developing cost-efficient strategies for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) diagnosis is paramount. The current levels of knowledge allow for PJI diagnostic recommendations based on scientific evidence but do not consider the benefits, opportunities, costs, and risks of the different diagnostic alternatives.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We determined the best diagnostic strategy for knee and hip PJI in the ambulatory setting for Medicare patients, utilizing benefits, opportunities, costs, and risks evaluation through multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA).

METHODS

The PJI diagnostic definition supported by the Musculoskeletal Infection Society was employed for the MCDA. Using a preclinical model, we evaluated three diagnostic strategies that can be conducted in a Medicare patient seen in the outpatient clinical setting complaining of a painful TKA or THA. Strategies were (1) screening with serum markers (erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR]/C-reactive protein [CRP]) followed by arthrocentesis in positive cases, (2) immediate arthrocentesis, and (3) serum markers requested simultaneously with arthrocentesis. MCDA was conducted through the analytic hierarchy process, comparing the diagnostic strategies in terms of benefits, opportunities, costs, and risks.

RESULTS

Strategy 1 was the best alternative to diagnose knee PJI among Medicare patients (normalized value: 0.490), followed by Strategy 3 (normalized value: 0.403) and then Strategy 2 (normalized value: 0.106). The same ranking of alternatives was observed for the hip PJI model (normalized value: 0.487, 0.405, and 0.107, respectively). The sensitivity analysis found this sequence to be robust with respect to benefits, opportunities, and risks. However, if during the decision-making process, cost savings was given a priority of higher than 54%, the ranking for the preferred diagnostic strategy changed.

CONCLUSIONS

After considering the benefits, opportunities, costs, and risks of the different available alternatives, our preclinical model supports the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons recommendations regarding the use of serum markers (ESR/CRP) before arthrocentesis as the best diagnostic strategy for PJI among Medicare patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, economic and decision analysis. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Extensor mechanism reconstruction with achilles tendon allograft in TKA: results of an abbreviate rehabilitation protocol

Various treatment alternatives address extensor mechanism failure after total knee arthroplasty. We present the results of a protocol utilizing Achilles tendon allograft followed by an abbreviated immobilization program to treat extensor mechanism disruptions after TKA in 29 knees (27 patients). Failed reconstruction was defined as mechanical allograft failure requiring re-intervention, extension lag >30°, recurrent falls, regression to a lower ambulatory status, and revision due to infection. With mean follow-up of 3.5 years, seventeen cases (58.6%) had satisfactory results, eleven cases (37.9%) were considered failures, and one case was lost to follow-up. Among failures, eight (27.5%) underwent reoperation with four (13.8%) due to late infections. Our observational data suggest that 1) a shortened immobilization protocol yields less favorable results than expected, and 2) continuous monitoring of patients who had allograft reconstruction for possible development of late infection is recommended.

Total knee replacement with the use of a tourniquet: more pros than cons

Total knee replacement (TKR) is an operation that can be performed with or without the use of a tourniquet. Meta-analyses of the available Level-1 studies have demonstrated that the use of a tourniquet leads to a significant reduction in blood loss. The opponents for use of a tourniquet cite development of complications such as skin bruising, neurovascular injury, and metabolic disturbance as drawbacks. Although there may certainly be reason for concern in arteriopathic patients, there is little evidence that routine use of a tourniquet during TKR results in any of the above complications. The use of a tourniquet, on the other hand, provides a bloodless field that allows the surgeon to perform the procedure with expediency and optimal visualisation. Blood conservation has gained great importance in recent years due to increased understanding of the problems associated with blood transfusion, such as increased surgical site infection (due to immunomodulation effect), increased length of hospital stay and increased cost. Based on the authors' understanding of the available evidence, the routine use of a tourniquet during TKR is justified as good surgical practice.

Periprosthetic knee infection: ten strategies that work

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the most serious complications following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The demand for TKA is rapidly increasing, resulting in a subsequent increase in infections involving knee prosthesis. Despite the existence of common management practices, the best approach for several aspects in the management of periprosthetic knee infection remains controversial. This review examines the current understanding in the management of the following aspects of PJI: preoperative risk stratification, preoperative antibiotics, preoperative skin preparation, outpatient diagnosis, assessing for infection in revision cases, improving culture utility, irrigation and debridement, one and two-stage revision, and patient prognostic information. Moreover, ten strategies for the management of periprosthetic knee infection based on available literature, and experience of the authors were reviewed.

The relevance of the radiological signs of acetabular retroversion among patients with femoroacetabular impingement

Orthopaedic surgeons have accepted various radiological signs to be representative of acetabular retroversion, which is the main characteristic of focal over-coverage in patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Using a validated method for radiological analysis, we assessed the relevance of these signs to predict intra-articular lesions in 93 patients undergoing surgery for FAI. A logistic regression model to predict chondral damage showed that an acetabular retroversion index (ARI) > 20%, a derivative of the well-known cross-over sign, was an independent predictor (p = 0.036). However, ARI was less significant than the Tönnis classification (p = 0.019) and age (p = 0.031) in the same model. ARI was unable to discriminate between grades of chondral lesions, while the type of cam lesion (p = 0.004) and age (p = 0.047) were able to. Other widely recognised signs of acetabular retroversion, such as the ischial spine sign, the posterior wall sign or the cross-over sign were irrelevant according to our analysis. Regardless of its secondary predictive role, an ARI > 20% appears to be the most clinically relevant radiological sign of acetabular retroversion in symptomatic patients with FAI.

Surgical approaches for cam femoroacetabular impingement: the use of multicriteria decision analysis

BACKGROUND

Currently, three surgical approaches are available for the treatment of cam femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), namely surgical hip dislocation (SHD), hip arthroscopy (HA), and the miniopen anterior approach of the hip (MO). Although previous systematic reviews have compared these different approaches, an overall assessment of their performance is not available.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We therefore executed a multidimensional structured comparison considering the benefits, opportunities, costs, and risk (BOCR) of the different approaches using multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA).

METHODS

A MCDA using analytic hierarchical process (AHP) was conducted to compare SHD, HA, and MO in terms of BOCR on the basis of available evidence, institutional experience, costs, and our understanding of pathophysiology of FAI. A preclinical decision-making model was created for cam FAI to establish the surgical approach that better accomplishes our objectives regarding the surgical treatment. A total score of an alternative's utility and sensitivity analysis was established using commercially available AHP software.

RESULTS

The AHP model based on BOCR showed that MO is the best surgical approach for cam FAI (normalized score: 0.38) followed by HA (normalized score: 0.36) and SHD (normalized score: 0.25). The sensitivity analysis showed that HA would turn into the best alternative if the variable risks account for more than 61.8% of the priority during decision-making. In any other decision-making scenario, MO remains as the best alternative.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a recognized method for decision-making, this study provides supportive data for the use of MO approach as our preferred surgical approach for cam FAI. The latter is predominantly derived from the lower cost of this approach. Our data may be considered a proxy performance measurement for surgical approaches in cam FAI.

Do previous operative reports provide the critical information necessary for revision total hip arthroplasty?

An operative note is a vital component of a patient's medical-legal record, permitting the surgical team to safely administer perioperative care. Despite this critical function, operative note contents are neither standardized nor regulated; this is especially concerning in orthopedic surgery. As younger patients undergo total hip arthroplasty (THA) and outlive their prostheses, the need for revision THA cannot be ignored. Surgeons performing primary THA must be cognizant to record detailed implant characteristics to ensure that if necessary, the revision surgeon will have all pertinent information to optimally treat the patient. Our survey of operative notes reveals the dismal nature of component documentation during primary THA; implementation of a standardized procedure-specific operative note guideline may minimize incomplete dictations and drive surgeons to include all pertinent information.

The impact of lumbar scoliosis on pain, function and health-related quality of life in postmenopausal women

The impact of adult scoliosis on pain, function and health-related quality of life (QOL) has not been clearly defined. A population-based study using widely applied screening tools could better reflect the impact of adult scoliosis. In this study, a visual analog pain scale assessment (VAS) for lumbar and leg pain, an Oswestry disability index (ODI) and a standard version of the Medical Outcome Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire were sent by mail to 261 women of age 50 years and older, consecutively evaluated with dual-energy radiograph absorptiometry (DXA) scan images. 138 patients (32 with lumbar curves 10° or bigger) returned the questionnaires. Differences in lumbar VAS, leg VAS, ODI and SF-36 values between groups of patients with curves <10°, 10°-19° and ≥20° were evaluated. Correlation analyses of the Cobb angle, age and body mass index (BMI) with VAS, ODI and SF-36 values, and multivariate regression analysis were performed. Patients with curves <10°, 10°-19° and ≥20° had no significant differences in lumbar or leg VAS, ODI or SF-36 values. ODI values correlated with age and BMI; SF-36 values correlated with BMI only; lumbar and leg VAS values did not correlate with lumbar curvature, age or BMI. Regression disclosed that Cobb angle values did not influence ODI, SF-36 or VAS values. In postmenopausal women with mild and moderate lumbar curves, Cobb angle had no influence on pain, function and QOL; age and BMI had small effect.

Factors associated with variability in length of sick leave because of acute low back pain in Chile

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Acute low back pain (LBP) is a frequent cause of physician visits and sick leave. Patients with longer sick leave account for most costs associated with LBP. Most research on risk factors for prolonged sick leave because of LBP has been done in Anglo-Saxon or Northern European populations with occupational LBP. Few studies have been conducted in less affluent Latin countries.

PURPOSE

To investigate the prevalence of acute LBP as a cause of sick leave and the variables associated with longer work absence (WA) because of acute LBP in Chile.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study of nonoccupational sick leave certificates issued in a 1-year period by the Chilean Public Health System.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Ten thousand cases with nonoccupational sick leave certificates issued with the diagnosis of acute LBP.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Prevalence of acute LBP as a cause of sick leave, days of WA, and subsidy payment.

METHODS

A review of sick leave certificates from patients with different diagnoses was done to determine the prevalence of acute LBP as a cause of sick leave. We investigated whether age, gender, history of at least one episode of sick leave in the previous year because of acute LBP or because of other diagnoses, stipendiary subsidy paid (converted to US $), work activity, occupation, and the specialty of the attending physician influenced the length of sick leave.

RESULTS

Acute LBP represented 5.4% of cases causing sick leave. Patients with acute LBP who had significantly longer sick leave than the rest of the population were patients with an episode of WA because of LBP in the previous year (14% longer sick leave than patients without that history), manual workers (35% longer than nonmanual workers), and patients seen by orthopedic surgeons (43% longer than patients seen by other medical specialists). Nonpregnant women and men had similar durations of sick leave because of acute LBP.

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians who treat patients with LBP should be aware of these variables associated with longer sick leave because of acute LBP, which represents a significant burden to any society and is an important epidemiologic problem.