Doppler ultrasound accurately screens patients with appendicitis

Ultrasound (US) has been reported as a useful aid to increase the sensitivity and specificity of the diagnosis of appendicitis. To determine the accuracy of US, we performed a prospective study of patients evaluated in the emergency department for acute appendicitis. US results of 125 consecutive patients over an 11-month period were correlated with operative and pathologic findings and clinical follow-up. The appendix was visualized as a noncompressible structure in 19 patients, and 18 had appendicitis (95%). Ten of the 12 patients with abnormal Doppler activity in the appendix had appendicitis (83%). Conversely, the appendix could not be visualized in 102 patients, and 100 did not have appendicitis (98%). One hundred five of the 113 patients (93%) with absent abnormal Doppler activity did not have appendicitis. Ninety-four of the 125 patients had neither visualization of the appendix nor abnormal activity, and 2 had appendicitis. The sensitivity of US for appendicitis was 90 per cent, and the specificity was 94 per cent. Visualization of the noncompressible appendix or abnormal Doppler activity strongly suggests appendicitis. More importantly, the absence of both of these ultrasonographic findings defines a patient subset that may be safely discharged from the emergency department without admission.

Is laparoscopy safe and effective for treatment of acute small-bowel obstruction?

BACKGROUND

Acute small bowel obstruction (SBO) has been a relative contraindication for laparoscopic treatment due to the potential for bowel distention and the risk of enteric injury. However, as laparoscopic experience has increased, surgeons have begun to apply minimal access techniques to the management of acute SBO.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of all patients with acute SBO in whom laparoscopic treatment was attempted. Patients with chronic symptoms and elective admission were excluded. Patients treated by laparoscopy were compared to those converted to laparotomy for differences in morbidity, postoperative length of stay, and return of bowel function as evidenced by toleration of a liquid diet.

RESULTS

Laparoscopy was performed in 40 patients for acute SBO. The etiologies of obstruction included adhesions (35 cases), Meckel's diverticulum (two cases), femoral hernia (one case), periappendiceal abscess (one case), and regional enteritis (one case). Laparoscopic treatment was possible in 24 patients (60%), but 13 patients required conversion to laparotomy for inadequate laparoscopic visualization (two cases), infarcted bowel (two cases), enterotomy (four cases), and inability to relieve the obstruction laparoscopically (five cases). There were ten complications-one in the laparoscopic group (pneumonia) and nine in the converted group (prolonged ileus, four cases; wound infection, two cases; pneumonia, two cases; and perioperative myocardial infarction, one case). Respectively, the laparoscopic and converted groups had mean operative times of 68 and 106 min a mean return of bowel function of 1.8 and 6.2 days, and a mean postoperative stay of 3.6 and 10.5 days. Long-term follow-up was available in 34 patients. One recurrence of SBO requiring operation occurred in each group during a mean follow-up of 88 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopy is a safe and effective procedure for the treatment of acute SBO in selected patients. This approach requires surgeons to have a low threshold for conversion to laparotomy. Laparoscopic treatment appears to result in an earlier return of bowel function and a shorter postoperative length of stay, and it will likely have lower costs.