Abstract P5-12-02: Effect of 5 vs 2.5 mg/day letrozole on residual estrogen levels in post-menopausal women with high BMI - A prospective crossover study

Background: Some studies have suggested that women with high BMI have less benefit from aromatase inhibitors (AI) vs. tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment for early breast cancer. One possible mechanism for this observation is that complete suppression of estrogen is not achieved in these women with the standard flat dose of AI. We evaluated whether a doubling of letrozole to 5 mg/day for 4 weeks affected residual estrogen levels in this population.

Methods: Post-menopausal women with early breast cancer and BMI>25 already taking adjuvant letrozole for at least 3 months were recruited from medical oncology clinics at 4 sites in Toronto, Canada. Fasting blood samples were collected 24 hours following the last dose at baseline (routine use of own letrozole), after 28 days of monitored adherence to a provided supply of letrozole (Femara) 2.5 mg/day (Part A), and after an additional 28 days of letrozole (Femara) 5 mg/day (Part B). Symptom/quality of life questionnaires were completed at the same timepoints. Estradiol and estrone were measured using a high sensitivity liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay. One interim analysis for futility and efficacy was planned after 31 eligible patients had completed the study, using estradiol and O'Brien-Fleming boundaries with an inner wedge.

Results: 36 patients were enrolled and started on study, and 31 eligible patients completed Parts A and B. The 5 non-completers withdrew because of adverse events (n=4, unlikely related to drug) or withdrawal of consent (n=1). Median age was 62 (range 48 to 77) and BMI 28.3 kg/m2 (Range 25.2 to 42.2 kg/m2). One patient had non-postmenopausal estrogen levels at Day 29 and Day 57 and one patient's blood assay was unsuccessful; both were excluded from further analyses. The predetermined stopping rule for futility was met. Estradiol levels (mean±standard deviation) changed from 2.68±0.40 pg/mL at baseline to 2.67±0.59 pg/mL at Day 29 to 2.70±0.53 pg/mL at Day 57. Mean change from Day 29 to Day 57 was 0.03±0.48 pg/mL (95% confidence interval -0.15 to 0.21 pg/mL). Four patients reported new or increased arthralgias (to NCI CTCAE Grade 2 or 3) while taking letrozole 5 mg/day in Part B. There was no association between changes in estradiol levels and either study non-completion or the development of arthralgias. Estrone results were similar.

Conclusion: Increasing letrozole from 2.5 to 5 mg/day did not further suppress estrogen levels in women with BMI>25. It is unlikely that letrozole dosing tailored to body size would improve clinical outcomes. The letrozole 5 mg/day intervention was terminated based on the results of the interim analysis for futility.

Citation Format: Cescon DW, Ennis M, Pritchard KI, Townsley C, Warr D, Elser C, Rao L, Stambolic V, Sridhar S, Goodwin PJ. Effect of 5 vs 2.5 mg/day letrozole on residual estrogen levels in post-menopausal women with high BMI - A prospective crossover study. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-12-02.

A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over trial of the impact on quality of life of continuing dexamethasone beyond 24 h following adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer

Uncertainty remains about the optimal anti-emetic regimen for control of delayed nausea and vomiting after adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Many patients receive dexamethasone but complain of insomnia, anxiety/agitation, and indigestion. The aim was to determine if patients receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer prefer treatment with dexamethasone or placebo for prophylaxis against delayed nausea and vomiting, and to compare quality of life (QOL) between the two treatments. In this randomized, double-blind, cross-over trial, we compared oral dexamethasone (4 mg twice daily for 2 days) versus placebo for chemotherapy-naïve patients with breast cancer. All patients received intravenous granisetron and dexamethasone pre-chemotherapy and oral granisetron on day 2. Primary endpoints were: (i) patient preference; (ii) difference between cycles in change of QOL from days 1 to 8. Median age of the 94 women was 51 years (range 27-76): 79 received fluorouracil/epirubicin/cyclophosphamide and 15 received doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide. Thirteen withdrew pre-cycle 2 with no differences between arms. Of 80 patients stating a preference, 31 preferred placebo (39 %, 95 % CI: 28-50 %) and 37 (46 %, 95 % CI: 35-58 %) preferred dexamethasone; 12 had no preference. There were no differences in intensity of vomiting, nausea, or time to onset of vomiting. There was greater decrease in global QOL (p = 0.06) when patients received dexamethasone. No other symptom/QOL domains differed significantly. In conclusion, no significant difference was found in patient preference, QOL, or symptoms regardless of whether dexamethasone or placebo was used after adjuvant chemotherapy.

Can prognostic factors identify women receiving anthracycline plus cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy (MEC) who do not require an NK1 receptor antagonist?

e20502

Background: Age, alcohol use, and history of sickness associated with pregnancy or motion have been identified as risk factors for chemotherapy-induced emesis. This post hoc analysis addressed two questions: 1) Can prognostic factors identify a low risk group for whom ondansetron (OND) plus dexamethasone [D] alone provide a high level of protection (≥80% no emesis)? 2) Does the NK1 receptor antagonist aprepitant improve antiemetic outcome regardless of emetic risk? Methods: The analysis was based upon outcomes in patients with breast cancer enrolled in a Phase III double-blind, placebo-controlled trial randomized to Day 1 OND 8 mg and D 20 mg before chemotherapy and OND 8 hours later and OND 8 mg bid Days 2–3 vs. Day 1 aprepitant 125 mg PO, OND 8 mg, and D 12 mg before chemotherapy and OND 8 mg 8 hours later and aprepitant 80 mg PO qd Days 2–3. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to assess the impact on emesis of the regimen with aprepitant, and previously reported risk factors, including age (<55 and ≥55 years), ethanol use (0–4 or ≥5 drinks/week), history of pregnancy-related morning sickness, and history of motion sickness, using a modified intent-to-treat approach. Results: 856 patients were assessed for efficacy. Treatment with aprepitant (p<0.0001), older age (p=0.006), ethanol use (p=0.0048), and no history of morning sickness (p=0.0007) were all significantly associated with reduced likelihood of emesis; motion sickness was not a risk factor. The Table below shows the probability of no emesis associated with the presence of 0, 1, 2, or all of these factors in the aprepitant and active control arms. Conclusions: 1) The low-risk group identified by this analysis is of questionable utility because it comprised less than 3% of patients. 2) We could not confirm that motion sickness was a significant risk factor. 3) Aprepitant improved the control of emesis irrespective of the number of risk factors for emesis.

[Table: see text]

[Table: see text]

Descriptive study on the lost productivity in breast cancer patients

6542

Background: There is a paucity of data assessing the potential impact of breast cancer diagnosis on the productivity of affected women. The objective was to identify and quantify lost productivity, health utilities and quality of life experienced in women diagnosed with breast cancer. Methods: A consecutive cross-sectional cohort of women with breast cancer (at any stage) attending outpatient clinics at Mount Sinai Hospital/Princess Margaret Hospital were eligible and consented to participate in the study. Women completed questionnaires assessing demographic and disease related information, work productivity and activity impairment utility (EQ5D VAS) and quality of life (FACT-B). Results: Data from 103 patients age 56.5 ± 11.9 years (mean +SD) were collection. Distribution of stage at diagnosis was as follows: 0 (31%), I (26%), II (10%), III (5%), IV (17%), unknown (11%). Time since diagnosis was 30.0 ± 39.1 months. Most women had recently been on active treatment for their breast cancer: chemotherapy (47%), hormone manipulation (23%), herceptin (6%), radiation (27%) and unknown (15%). 9% of women had metastatic disease, 35% had an income between $0 and $30,000. 58% of women were working full time for pay before their diagnosis, whereas only 19% were working full time for pay at the time of the assessment. At the time of the assessment, 18% were on disability leave. 8.7% of the women retired between the times of their diagnosis to the current assessment. Of those still working, a mean of 8.7 ± 11.6 days were missed from work in the previous 30 days due to problems related to breast cancer. The average number of days that employed patients actually worked (N=27) was 16.0 ± 9.0 days (range 4–30 days). 8% of patients required paid health care assistance during the past 4 weeks. 44% of patients had a spouse as an unpaid caregiver, followed by child/parent (20%) and friend (13%). Mean overall health rated by the respondents using the EQ5D VAS was 73.2 ± 16.3. The FACT-B mean was 68.0 ± 12.5 (range 27 to 98). Conclusion: Breast cancer negatively impacts work productivity and overall activity. The significant use of both paid and unpaid assistance would amount to significant societal costs which are currently not included in most cost-effectiveness analyses.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Implementing evidence based antiemetic guidelines in the oncology setting: results of a 4-month prospective intervention study

There is a considerable gap between obtaining results in randomized trials and implementing them into practice. This is particularly relevant with the high-cost 5HT3 antiemetics, which include ondansetron, dolasetron and granisetron. Randomized trial data suggests that they should be used as a single daily dose during only the first 24 h of chemotherapy because they offer little benefit over less costly agents beyond this period. In this study, six intervention methods (i.e. multifaceted approach) were combined to change physicians' 5HT3 prescribing patterns to comply with evidence-based antiemetic guidelines. A six-step implementation process was adopted, consisting of guideline dissemination, the use of opinion leaders, interactive educational workshops, therapeutic reminders in the form of preprinted orders, clinical interventions by pharmacists for the event of inappropriate antiemetic orders, and physician audit and feedback. Once implemented, the control of emesis was collected in all patients who were enrolled in the intervention program. Multivariable regression analysis was then used to assess whether prescribing within antiemetic guidelines compromised patient care. A total of 195 inpatients were enrolled in the study over the 4-month intervention period. Overall, 88.7% of granisetron prescriptions fulfilled the guidelines with respect to appropriate indication, dosage, and duration of therapy. The multivariable analysis suggested that granisetron prescribing within guidelines did not compromise the control of acute and delayed emesis. In addition, patients who received evidence-based antiemetic therapy experienced a significant reduction in the severity of acute nausea [risk ratio (RR) = 0.69; P=0.03]. The results of this guideline implementation study revealed that a pharmacist-driven multifaceted intervention program for such high-cost agents as 5HT3 antiemetics can promote their use in a clinically appropriate manner and can save unnecessary drug costs without compromising the quality of patient care.

A randomized controlled trial of the effects of group psychological therapy on survival in women with metastatic breast cancer

In order to test the effect of a psychological intervention on survival from cancer, 66 women with metastatic breast cancer, all receiving standard medical care, were randomly assigned into two groups; one group (n = 30) attended the psychological intervention, consisting of 35 weekly, 2 h sessions of supportive plus cognitive behavioral therapy; the control group (n = 36) received only a home study cognitive behavioral package. No significant difference was found in survival post-randomization between the groups as assessed by a log rank test 5 years after the commencement of the study. As expected, several prognostic factors were significant predictors of survival: metastatic site, hormonal receptor status, and chemotherapy prior to randomization. While many personal and demographic variables did not influence survival, there was a significant effect of self-reported exercise (possibly due to better health). A small subgroup of intervention subjects who attended outside support groups also survived significantly longer than those who did not. The strengths and limitations of the present study are discussed, and the results contrasted with those of a well known study by Spiegel et al. (Spiegel, D., Bloom, J.R., Kraemer, H.C. and Gottheil, E. (1989) Lancet ii, 888-891). We propose that a different experimental design (correlative) may be needed to show any effect of self-help behaviors and psychological attributes in a small minority of patients.

Randomized trial of intensive cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil chemotherapy compared with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer. National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group

PURPOSE

To determine the relative efficacy of an intensive cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil (CEF) adjuvant chemotherapy regimen compared with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) in node-positive breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer were randomly allocated to receive either cyclophosphamide 100 mg/m2 orally days 1 through 14; methotrexate 40 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) days 1 and 8; and fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 and 8 or cyclophosphomide 75 mg/m2 orally days 1 through 14; epirubicin 60 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 and 8; and fluorouracil 500 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 and 8. Each cycle was administered monthly for 6 months. Patients administered CEF received antibiotic prophylaxis with cotrimoxazole two tablets twice a day for the duration of chemotherapy.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 59 months. One hundred sixty-nine of the 359 CMF patients developed recurrence compared with 132 of the 351 CEF patients. The corresponding 5-year relapse-free survival rates were 53% and 63%, respectively (P = .009). One hundred seven CMF patients died compared with 85 CEF patients. The corresponding 5-year actuarial survival rates were 70% and 77%, respectively (P = .03). The rate of hospitalization for febrile neutropenia was 1.1% in the CMF group compared with 8.5% in the CEF group. There was one case of congestive heart failure in a patient who received CMF compared with none in the CEF group. Acute leukemia occurred in five patients in the CEF group.

CONCLUSION

The results of this trial show the superiority of CEF over CMF in terms of both disease-free and overall survival in premenopausal women with axillary node-positive breast cancer.

Phase II study of dexverapamil plus anthracycline in patients with metastatic breast cancer who have progressed on the same anthracycline regimen

The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether metastatic breast cancer that has progressed on an anthracycline-containing drug regimen will subsequently respond to that identical regimen if dexverapamil, a modulator of P-glycoprotein-mediated drug resistance, is given concomitantly. Eligible patients received 180 mg/m2 dexverapamil every 6 h for 15 doses with the anthracycline administered 30 min after the seventh dose. Blood for dexverapamil levels was drawn before and 30 min after this dose. When possible, biopsies were obtained to measure mdr-1 expression by reverse transcription-PCR and by image cytometry. Of the 21 patients entered onto the trial, 20 were evaluable for response. There were two partial responses (10%) that both lasted for 6 months, and two additional patients had stable disease. Seven patients had asymptomatic cardiotoxicity consisting of hypotension (24%), bradycardia (5%), or prolongation of the P-R interval (14%). Two patients developed acute congestive heart failure, one on dexverapamil and one 10 days after stopping it. Dexverapamil did not seem to increase anthracycline toxicity. The median trough dexverapamil plus norverapamil level on day 3 was 1110 ng/ml (range, 186-3385 ng/ml), and the median peak level was 2164 ng/ml (range, 964-8382 ng/ml). There was poor correlation between reverse transcription-PCR and image cytometry for the level of mdr-1 expression. Because dexverapamil has been shown to affect doxorubicin pharmacokinetics subsequent to the initiation of this trial, it cannot be concluded that the responses seen were necessarily due to P-glycoprotein inhibition. Additional studies are necessary to determine whether mdr-1 modulators can reverse clinical drug resistance in breast cancer patients. The intrinsic cardiotoxicity of dexverapamil makes it less suitable for such studies than several other available agents.

Consensus proposal for 5HT3 antagonists in the prevention of acute emesis related to highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Dose, schedule, and route of administration

Selective antagonists to the Type 3 serotonin receptor (5HT3) in combination with corticosteroids are now considered the standard of care for the prevention of emesis from moderately to highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Here we address issues of optimal dose, schedule and route of administration of four currently available selectable 5HT3 antagonists. This paper utilizes an evidence based medicine approach to the literature regarding this class of drugs, emphasizing the results large, randomized, controlled trials to make formal recommendations concerning optimal use of this important new class of anti-emetic agents. We conclude that for each drug there is a plateau in therapeutic efficacy at a definable dose level above which further dose escalation does not improve outcome. Furthermore, a single dose is as effective as multiple doses or continuous infusion, and finally, emerging data demonstrate that the oral route is equally efficacious as the intravenous route of administration, even with highly emetogenic chemotherapy.

Use of dexamethasone and granisetron in the control of delayed emesis for patients who receive highly emetogenic chemotherapy. National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group

PURPOSE

To evaluate the roles of granisetron and dexamethasone for emesis control on days 2 through 7 after the administration of cisplatin in doses of 50 mg/m2 or greater to patients who had not previously received chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Four hundred thirty-five eligible and assessable patients were randomized to one of two arms in a double-blind fashion: arm A; granisetron 3 mg intravenous (i.v.) plus dexamethasone 10 mg i.v. prechemotherapy followed by granisetron 1 mg orally at 6 and 12 hours, then granisetron 1 mg orally and dexamethasone 8 mg orally twice daily on days 2 through 7 (219 patients); arm B; as in arm A but with placebo substituted for granisetron on days 2 through 7 (216 patients). All patients completed diaries in which episodes of emesis and severity of nausea were recorded.

RESULTS

The addition of granisetron on days 2 through 7 had no discernable impact on nausea and vomiting during this period.

CONCLUSION

The administration of a 5-hydroxytryptamine3, receptor (5-HT3) antagonist, in this case granisetron, after 24 hours conferred no benefit. This negative result needs to be assessed in light of conflicting literature, but at present it does not appear that the routine use of these drugs in this setting is justified.

Rural youth: HIV/STD knowledge levels and sources of information

Though it is recognised that a sound knowledge of HIV/STD transmission is insufficient on its own to ensure that young people practise safer sex, knowledge of this sort is a necessary prerequisite to safe sex behaviours. Research on the HIV/STD knowledge levels of young people has shown that, while they have high levels of HIV knowledge, they generally have little idea about the transmission of other STDs. Moreover, most of this research has been conducted with more accessible youth in large urban centres. The research reported in this paper focused on HIV/STD knowledge levels, awareness of safe and unsafe sexual practices, and the information sources accessed by 1168 young people living in small rural towns in Queensland, Tasmania and Victoria. As with mainstream youth, the participants in this study had high levels of HIV knowledge and very low levels of knowledge about the transmission of other STDs, their names and symptoms. Practical knowledge of the safety of sexual practices was good, although a number of students confused high risk practices with high risk groups. Students mainly accessed informal information sources such as parents, peers and magazines and took little advantage of more formal sources even when they were available in their towns. There were few gender differences in levels of knowledge; however, girls accessed more information sources and knew more names of STDs. The implications of these findings are discussed in relation to young people developing critical attitudes towards more informal sources, and the better use of more formal sources.

"When you carry condoms all the boys think you want it": negotiating competing discourses about safe sex

With the advent of HIV, sexual health campaigns and formal sex education in schools have worked to instil the concept of safe sex into the collective minds of Australia's youth. However the concept in its present guise is a fairly limited one. We argue in this paper that the predominant emphasis in education programmes on safe sex as condom use may be counter-productive for some young heterosexuals for two reasons. First, this strategy is male-focused and may not extrapolate well to young women who face special risks around pregnancy and rigid societal gender norms which govern sexual behaviour. Second, health promotion strategies aimed at young heterosexuals are based on an assumption of rational decision-making in sexual encounters and obscure the non-rational nature of arousal and desire, and the unequal power relations that exist between young men and women engaging in sex. Five hundred and twelve senior rural students participated in the study which included group discussions about sexuality and survey items which focused on the meanings of safe sex and the accessibility and use of condoms. The results showed that though most students identified condoms with safe sex, many were ambivalent about using them. Reasons given related to problems of negotiation, difficulties of access, and the risks which condoms gave no protection from, such as a sullied reputation. Perhaps, partly because of this, some students were looking to less secure methods of protection such as informal history-taking and monogamy. It is argued that successful sexual health promotion strategies must address the broad spectrum of concerns facing young men and women when they become sexually active and that consideration be given to the social context in which young people conduct their sexual lives.

'That's the problem with living in a small town': privacy and sexual health issues for young rural people

Survey and focus group discussions examining sexual health issues for young people were conducted with 1168 year 8 and year 10 secondary school students living in small rural communities across Australia. Growing up in the country was generally perceived as a positive experience; however, many young people felt that they had little privacy. Two main areas of concern emerged in relation to sexual health issues: worries about being recognised in public venues such as doctor's surgeries and chemists, and the informal mechanisms among peer groups that appraised and regulated sexual behaviour and attitudes. There were some significant gender differences evident in the expectations and experiences attached to these concerns, with girls expressing more awareness of and concern towards their public reputations when accessing sexual health services. They also felt that their sexual reputations among peers were closely monitored by way of their behaviour and appearance. This can militate against confident and assertive safer sex strategies such as condom use, when initiating or insisting upon condom use is construed as evidence of promiscuity or a preparedness to engage in sex. Concerns around privacy may be acutely experienced by young rural women, and health services providers need to be aware of these issues and efforts need to be made to address and allay the apprehensions of young people in this sensitive area.

Effect of postchemotherapy nausea and vomiting on health-related quality of life. The Quality of Life and Symptom Control Committees of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group

The purpose was to measure the effects of postchemotherapy nausea and vomiting (PCNV) on health-related quality of life (HQL) in patients receiving either moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy. The study sample consisted of 832 chemotherapy-naive patients with cancer who received either moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy as part of multicenter trials of new antiemetics. The patients completed the self-report European Organization for Research and Cancer (EORTC) core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) before chemotherapy (baseline) and 1 week (day 8) and 2-4 weeks after chemotherapy. They also completed a self-report nausea and vomiting (NV) diary for 5-7 days after chemotherapy. To determine the effects of PCNV on HQL, the change in scores between the baseline and day 8 HQL assessments was calculated for each domain and symptom in the QLQ-C30 and compared in four subgroups of patients: those with both nausea and vomiting, those with nausea but no vomiting, those with no nausea but with vomiting, and those with neither nausea nor vomiting. The group with both nausea and vomiting showed statistically significantly worse physical, cognitive and social functioning, global quality of life, fatigue, anorexia, insomnia and dyspnea as compared to the group with neither nausea nor vomiting (0.0001 < P < 0.05). Patients with only nausea but no vomiting tended to have less worsening in functioning and symptoms than those having both nausea and vomiting. Increased severity of vomiting (> 2 episodes) was associated with worsening of only global quality of life and anorexia as compared with 1-2 episodes of vomiting (0.0001 < P < 0.01). By 2-4 weeks after chemotherapy all HQL scores had either returned to their baseline levels or were better than baseline. PCNV adversely affects several quality-of-life domains, but patients with only nausea experience less disruption than do those with both nausea and vomiting. Patients with 1-2 episodes of vomiting experience almost the same degree of disruption of HQL as do patients with more than 2 episodes of vomiting.

Randomized trial of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil chemotherapy added to tamoxifen as adjuvant therapy in postmenopausal women with node-positive estrogen and/or progesterone receptor-positive breast cancer: a report of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. Breast Cancer Site Group

PURPOSE AND METHODS

By the mid 1980s, tamoxifen alone was considered standard adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal women with node-positive, estrogen receptor (ER)- or progesterone receptor (PgR)-positive breast cancer. From 1984 through 1990, 705 eligible postmenopausal women with node-positive, ER- or PgR-positive breast cancer were randomized to a National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group (NCIC CTG) study that compared tamoxifen 30 mg by mouth daily for 2 years (TAM) versus TAM plus chemotherapy with all-intravenous cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2, methotrexate 40 mg/m2, and fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 given every 21 days for eight cycles (CMF).

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in overall survival, recurrence-free survival, locoregional recurrence-free survival, or distant recurrence-free survival between the two treatment arms. However, there was significantly greater severe toxicity, which included leukopenia (P < .0001), nausea and vomiting (P < .0001), and thromboembolic events (P < .0001), as well as significantly more mild or greater toxicity, which included thrombocytopenia (P = .04), anemia (P = .02), infection (P = .0004), mucositis (P = .0001), diarrhea (P = .0001), and neurologic toxicity (P = .006), in women who received TAM plus CMF.

CONCLUSION

The addition of CMF to TAM adds no benefit and considerable toxicity in this group of women.

Standard treatment of chemotherapy-induced emesis

Major breakthroughs in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced emesis have come through the use of selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonists in combination with corticosteroids. This combination can be considered standard for most but not all commonly used chemotherapeutic agents. Delayed-onset emesis remains a problem, particularly for patients receiving high-dose cisplatin. There is debate over the value of using selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonists beyond the first 24 h. Clinical trials have not settled this uncertainty, although it seems likely that they add only modestly to the effect of corticosteroids. For both the acute and delayed phases, dopamine receptor antagonists may add to the effectiveness of antiemetic therapy. This article outlines a strategy for initial antiemetic therapy and the rationale for the recommendations.

Determinants of postchemotherapy nausea and vomiting in patients with cancer. Quality of Life and Symptom Control Committees of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group

PURPOSE

To assess whether prechemotherapy health-related quality-of-life (HQL) variables are associated with postchemotherapy nausea and vomiting (PCNV), and to determine their relationship to patient and treatment variables.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eight hundred thirty-two chemotherapy-naive patients scheduled to receive antiemetic regimens containing a 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT3) antagonist with or without dexamethasone for moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy were enrolled. HQL was measured by the self-report European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Care Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) within 7 days before chemotherapy. Prechemotherapy HQL scores, as well as other patient, disease, and treatment variables were compared in the groups of patients who had PCNV and those who did not have PCNV. All variables were assessed initially in a univariate analysis and then together in a multivariate analysis using step-wise logistic regression. The final model generated by the multivariate analyses was used in a risk factor analysis to predict PCNV.

RESULTS

Univariate analyses identified 10 HQL variables and five patient and treatment characteristics that were associated with PCNV. In the multivariate analysis, the variables remaining in the final model included low social functioning, prechemotherapy nausea, female gender, highly emetogenic chemotherapy, and the lack of maintenance antiemetics (5-HT3 antagonists with or without dexamethasone) after chemotherapy. A history of low alcohol use was also associated with PCV, whereas increased fatigue and lower performance status were associated with PCN. In the risk factor analysis, the incidence of PCV increased from 20% in those having no risk factors to 76% in those having any four of the six risk factors.

CONCLUSION

Several pretreatment HQL, patient, and treatment characteristics are associated with the occurrence of PCNV. Patients about to receive moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy should be screened for these factors and additional measures, such as behavior modification and modification of antiemetic therapy, should be considered in attempts to improve the control of PCNV.

The role of supportive care in quality of life

Supportive care interventions are usually given with the intent of improving quality of life. Until recently, however, even studies of palliative interventions have infrequently incorporated some measure of overall benefit. This article reviews those recent supportive care studies that have attempted to measure either quality of life or some benefit other than improvement in a single symptom. Some palliative chemotherapy studies did indeed demonstrate measurable improvement in overall well-being, and some commonly cited supportive approaches were associated with a significant detriment in health-related quality of life.

Quality of life studies in chemotherapy-induced emesis

Health-related quality of life (HQL) was assessed before and after either moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy. When the pretreatment HQL in patients who did not vomit after chemotherapy (n = 203) was compared to those who vomited (n = 230), it was found that patients who did not vomit had better physical, role, and social function scores as well as a better global quality of life score than did patients who had one or more episodes of vomiting. Furthermore, in patients who did not vomit, the pretreatment fatigue and anorexia scores were better than in patients who did vomit. Thus, pretreatment HQL scores appear to have value in predicting which patients will experience chemotherapy-induced emesis. In the week following chemotherapy, HQL change scores from prechemotherapy values for cognitive function, global quality of life, fatigue, anorexia, insomnia and dyspnea were significantly worse in the group experiencing emesis than in the group who remained completely free of emesis. There were no differences in physical, role, emotional and social function attributable to chemotherapy-induced vomiting.

The role of palliative thoracic radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer death in both males and females. Despite this high incidence and mortality, comparatively little research has addressed the palliative treatment of thoracic symptoms. Until recently, information regarding the indications and effectiveness of radiation in this setting was obtained from retrospective reviews of single institutional experiences. More recently, three major randomized trials from the UK Medical Research Council (1991, 1992, 1994) have addressed the use of external beam radiation in randomized comparisons of different dose and fractionation strategies for patients with non-small cell lung cancer and symptoms due to intra-thoracic tumor. These studies show that shorter fractionation schemes provide equivalent palliation and essentially equivalent survival in the patient groups studied. Moreover, they provide estimates of the probability of successful palliation of common symptoms, and estimates of the toxicity of each regimen. A panel of oncologists with expertise in radiation oncology, medical oncology and epidemiology discussed the above trial results and a literature review. The panel concluded that radiation was indicated in the palliation of hemoptysis, chest pain, dysphagia, and dyspnea, and that the results of the MRC studies provided reasonable estimations of the efficacy and toxicity of radiation in this setting. These studies show that symptoms are more often than not improved with palliative radiotherapy (symptom improvement rates ranged from about 50 to 85%) and that palliation lasted for a substantial portion of the patients' remaining survival. The panel could not reach uniform consensus on the appropriate fractionation for radiation given with palliative intent. The panel agreed that favourable patients with stage IIIB NSCLC should be offered combined modality therapy with the intent of prolonging survival, and that patient preferences regarding the risks and benefits of this therapy should be considered. Further study was recommended, namely, a randomized trial evaluating five fractions of radiation vs a single fraction, using patient-based evaluation of palliation. The panel also recommended phase II development of a combined chemotherapy and low-dose radiation protocol appropriate for future study.

Dexamethasone improves the efficacy of granisetron in the first 24 h following high-dose cisplatin chemotherapy

The object of the study was to determine whether dexamethasone improved the efficacy of the serotonin receptor (5-HT3) antagonist granisetron in controlling acute (within 24 h) emesis in cancer patients receiving high-dose cisplatin chemotherapy and to ascertain whether continuation of granisetron after 24 h reduces the occurrence of delayed emesis. This randomised, double-blind, multicentre, three-arm study was conducted at 21 medical centres. A group of 292 nausea- and emesis-free patients with cancer, who had never had chemotherapy and were scheduled to receive at least 50 mg/m2 cisplatin, were given 3 mg granisetron i.v. in a 15-min infusion with or without 10 mg dexamethasone i.v. completed 5 min prior to high-dose cisplatin and 1 mg granisetron p.o. at +6 h and +12 h. Primary study end-points were control of emesis and nausea. Patients completed a self-report diary every 6 h for the first 24 h. At the end of the 24-h period, the patients who received dexamethasone had a significantly higher complete protection rate from emesis (64% compared to 39%) than those who received no steroid. Similarly, the dexamethasone-treated group had a significantly higher complete plus partial (0-2 emetic episodes) protection rate (84% compared to 64%). This study shows that dexamethasone markedly enhances the antiemetic efficacy of granisetron for acute-onset emesis in high-dose cisplatin chemotherapy.

A randomized trial of the effects of pharmacist intervention on the cost of antiemetic therapy with ondansetron

Ondansetron has had a major impact on the prevention of emesis in patients receiving chemotherapy. However, the high cost and potential for inappropriate prescribing of this agent warranted a closer examination of its utilization. Hospital guidelines regarding the use of ondansetron were prepared by the Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee and approved by the Medical Advisory Committee. The guidelines were then distributed to all physicians. Physicians were randomized into an intervention or non-intervention group. A prospective drug use evaluation was then conducted for a 10-week period where pharmacists monitored ondansetron prescribing and compared each order against hospital guidelines. For orders deemed inappropriate, only the intervention-group physicians were contacted for therapy modification. The control of nausea and vomiting was then assessed for all patients 24 h and 72 h after chemotherapy via a simple patient questionnaire. There were no significant differences with respect to the control of nausea and vomiting between patients who received ondansetron according to guidelines and those who did not. A total of 76% (48/63) of the prescriptions met hospital guidelines in the intervention group compared to 51.6% (33/64) in the control (P = 0.007). During the study period, physicians in the intervention group prescribed $Can 757 worth of ondansetron inappropriately compared to $1814 in the control. Drug use evaluation with pharmacist intervention was an effective method of controlling unnecessary hospital costs and contributed towards the appropriate use of ondansetron without compromising patient care.

Psychometric properties and responsiveness of the EORTC quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) in patients with breast, ovarian and lung cancer

The QLQ-C30, a health-related quality of life questionnaire developed for use in patients with cancer, has been previously validated in patients with lung cancer and head and neck cancer. In this study, further validation was carried out for 535 patients, including patients with breast cancer (n = 143) and ovarian cancer (n = 111) for whom there is no previously published validation, as well as patients with lung cancer (n = 160) and a heterogeneous group of other cancers (n = 121). All patients were entered in one of two trials of anti-emetics to prevent chemotherapy-induced emesis. The QLQ-C30 was completed before chemotherapy and on day 8 after chemotherapy. The factor structure in patients with breast and ovarian cancer was similar to that previously described. Interdomain correlations, in the entire group, were strongest for the physical and role function domains and the fatigue, pain and global quality of life domains before and after chemotherapy. In addition, after chemotherapy, social function was also strongly correlated with fatigue and global quality of life. These correlations were not always of equal strength in the breast, ovarian and lung groups, suggesting that there may be differences between these groups. The responsiveness of the QLQ-C30 in the presence of widely metastatic, as compared with locoregional, disease showed changes in the expected directions (i.e., diminished function in physical and social role functions and in global quality of life, with greater fatigue and pain in patients with metastatic disease). Eight days after chemotherapy, decreases were seen in physical, role and social functioning and in global quality of life, and there was greater fatigue, nausea and vomiting compared with before chemotherapy. Patients with breast cancer had better physical, role and social functioning and less fatigue and pain than patients with ovarian cancer. This result is expected, since many of the patients with breast cancer had early stage disease, whereas those with ovarian cancer had advanced stage disease. Mean scores for patients with lung cancer were between the other two groups, in keeping with the mixture of early and advanced stage disease in these patients. There was a strong correlation between ECOG performance status scores and several domains of the QLQ-C30; these were all in the expected directions. The results of this study confirm those in earlier studies on patients with lung cancer, and provide new information on patients with breast and ovarian cancer. In addition, the QLQ-C30 is responsive to the effects of chemotherapy and of metastatic disease.

Inconsistency of prognostic factors for post-chemotherapy nausea and vomiting

A number of prognostic factors have been reported to influence the probability of developing nausea and vomiting after cytotoxic chemotherapy. This study used data collected in four randomized anti-emetic trials conducted by the Clinical Trials Group of the National Cancer Institute of Canada (NCIC-CTG) to assess the consistency of the effects of these prognostic factors. A total of 582 patients, all of whom had received moderately emetogenic chemotherapy for the first time, but who were assigned to different anti-emetics, were included in the analysis. The major findings was that the probability of post-chemotherapy nausea and vomiting was much more strongly influenced by the type of chemotherapy given and the type of anti-emetic used than by patient (e.g., age, gender) or environmental (e.g., treatment location, time of administration) characteristics. Further, patient-related factors had different, and sometimes opposite, effects in different anti-emetic and chemotherapy subgroups. Finally, the relative potency of anti-emetics appeared to vary with chemotherapy regimens. Implications of these findings for future studies are discussed.

Effect of schedule and maintenance on the antiemetic efficacy of ondansetron combined with dexamethasone in acute and delayed nausea and emesis in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: a phase III trial by the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group

PURPOSE

This study examines whether the schedule of ondansetron significantly influences its antiemetic efficacy in the first 24 hours after chemotherapy, whether the administration of oral ondansetron after 24 hours is effective in preventing delayed emesis, and whether the efficacy of ondansetron is preserved over multiple courses of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A multicenter double-blind study randomized 302 cancer patients to one of three treatment arms. Arm A received dexamethasone 10 mg intravenously (i.v.) plus ondansetron (Zofran; Glaxo Canada Inc, Toronto, Canada) 8 mg i.v. prechemotherapy plus ondansetron 8 mg orally every 12 hours postchemotherapy for nine doses. Arm B received dexamethasone 10 mg i.v. plus ondansetron 16 mg i.v. prechemotherapy plus placebo orally postchemotherapy in the same schedule as arm A. Arm C received dexamethasone 10 mg i.v. plus ondansetron 8 mg prechemotherapy plus ondansetron 8 mg orally postchemotherapy for one dose followed by placebo orally every 12 hours for eight more doses. Response was assessed by the number of reported episodes of vomiting and by severity of nausea measured on a visual analog scale (VAS).

RESULTS

The two schedules of ondansetron used in the first 24 hours were no different in their antiemetic efficacy, with similar rates for complete responses (76.7% v 72.0%, P = .472), complete plus major responses (90.2% v 82.0%, P = .135), and severity of nausea (P = .348). Oral ondansetron after 24 hours was more effective than placebo in preventing delayed nausea and emesis, with superior rates of complete responses (59.6% v 42.1%, P = .012 by one-sided test), complete plus major responses (80.9% v 66.3%, P = .018 by one-sided test), and less severe nausea (9.2 mm v 18.6 mm on a 100-mm VAS, P = .002). The efficacy of ondansetron was maintained over subsequent courses of chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

The schedule of ondansetron in the first 24 hours does not influence its efficacy. The use of oral maintenance ondansetron is effective in preventing delayed maintenance ondansetron is effective in preventing delayed nausea and emesis after moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.

Double-blind randomised trial of a very-low-dose warfarin for prevention of thromboembolism in stage IV breast cancer

Patients receiving chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer are at high risk of thromboembolic disease. Long-term oral anticoagulant therapy is needed but increases the risk of haemorrhagic complications. We have assessed the safety and efficacy of warfarin in very low doses as prophylaxis. Women receiving chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer were randomly assigned either very-low-dose warfarin (152 patients) or placebo (159). The warfarin dose was 1 mg daily for 6 weeks and was then adjusted to maintain the prothrombin time at an international normalised ratio (INR) of 1.3 to 1.9. Study treatment continued until 1 week after the end of chemotherapy. The average daily dose from initiation of titration was 2.6 (SD 1.2) mg for the warfarin group and the mean INR was 1.52. The mean time at risk of thrombosis was 199 (126) days for warfarin-treated patients and 188 (137) days for placebo recipients (p = 0.45). There were 7 thromboembolic events (6 deep-vein thrombosis, 1 pulmonary embolism) in the placebo group and 1 (pulmonary embolism) in the warfarin group, a relative risk reduction of about 85% (p = 0.031). Major bleeding occurred in 2 placebo recipients and 1 warfarin-treated patient. There was no detectable difference in survival between the treatment groups. Very-low-dose warfarin is a safe and effective method for prevention of thromboembolism in patients with metastatic breast cancer who are receiving chemotherapy.

Phase II trial of 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid in the treatment of advanced breast cancer

Standard combination chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer produces response rates between 30-60% with limited impact on survival. We undertook a phase II trial to determine the activity of 5 fluorouracil (5FU) and folinic acid (FA) in patients with measurable metastatic or recurrent breast cancer who had received no prior chemotherapy. Patients meeting the eligibility criteria received 5FU 370 mg/m2/day and FA 200 mg/m2/day for 5 days repeated every 28 days, toxicity allowing. Response defined by standard criteria was assessed every 8 weeks and toxicity according to WHO criteria was determined on every course. Thirty-three patients were entered on trial. Thirty-two patients were evaluable for response and 33 for toxicity. The dose limiting toxicity was stomatitis with 7/32, 19/32, and 5/32 patients experiencing grade 1, 2, and 3 toxicity. Grades 1 and 2 diarrhea occurred in 17/32 and 11/32 patients respectively. Myelosuppression was not significant. Two complete and 11 partial responses were observed. The overall response rate was 41% (95% CI, 24-58%). Responses were seen in soft tissue and visceral sites. Patients who had received adjuvant chemotherapy more than 6 months prior to receiving 5FU and FA responded also. Six of 29 patients receiving standard combination chemotherapy as second line treatment responded subsequently. We concluded: 1) 5FU and FA is an active combination in the treatment of breast cancer warranting further evaluation in combination with other drugs; 2) the dose-limiting toxicity of stomatitis is tolerable; 3) patients receiving 5FU and FA as first line therapy can respond to conventional combination chemotherapy as second line treatment.

Outcome and prognostic factors in soft tissue sarcoma in the adult

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcome, patterns of failure and prognostic factors in this rare disease in adult patients treated at a single institution in the modern era.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The records of all patients (389 cases) with soft tissue sarcoma in the extremities, torso (excluding retroperitoneum), and head and neck managed between 1980 and 1988 were reviewed. A curative (radical) approach was used in 321 patients of whom 10% were recurrent lesions. The local management consisted of surgery alone in 54 cases, surgery and radiotherapy in 250 and radiotherapy alone in 17. Adjuvant chemotherapy was used as a policy for high grade lesions in the initial five years of the study (98 cases), but was omitted subsequently.

RESULTS

Extremity lesions fared more favourably compared to head and neck and torso lesions (p = 0.02) with respect to survival. Extremity and torso lesions had significantly better local control (p < 0.0001) than in the head and neck where local failure was a common cause of death. A multiple Cox regression analysis revealed that resection margins, local extension of tumor, age at diagnosis, and grade correlated with local relapse and distant relapse was also associated with local extension, high grade and in addition, large lesions. Size appeared especially predictive for distant failure, the most common cause of death. Distant failure was not influenced by the use of adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients treated for recurrence in this series had significantly worse survival due to increased distant failure despite similar local control to primary cases.

CONCLUSION

This series highlights the overall problem of distant failure in this disease. It also reaffirms the importance of obtaining local control both in the head and neck, where uncontrolled local disease is the major cause of death, and in general since local relapse appears to increase the risk of distant failure. It appears that the current staging systems should be reviewed in the light of the apparent effect of different prognostic factors.

Ondansetron compared with dexamethasone and metoclopramide as antiemetics in the chemotherapy of breast cancer with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil

BACKGROUND

Although ondansetron was found to be effective as an antiemetic in numerous clinical trials of highly emetogenic combination-chemotherapy regimens that included cisplatin, its role in milder emetogenic regimens has not been fully defined. To address its use with a widely used but less emetogenic regimen, we performed a double-blind, randomized clinical trial comparing ondansetron with dexamethasone and metoclopramide in patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil.

METHODS

A total of 165 women with breast cancer from 14 Canadian centers who were about to receive this chemotherapy for the first time were randomly assigned to receive either ondansetron (n = 85) or dexamethasone plus metoclopramide (n = 80), a widely used, standard antiemetic regimen. The patients recorded the incidence of nausea, emesis, and other side effects in diaries, and these data were compared in the two groups.

RESULTS

The patients who received dexamethasone and metoclopramide had significantly less nausea during the first 24 hours after chemotherapy was begun. Otherwise, there were no statistically significant differences in efficacy between the regimens. The incidence of drowsiness and increased appetite was higher in the group given dexamethasone and metoclopramide.

CONCLUSIONS

For women with breast cancer who are being treated with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil, the efficacy of dexamethasone and metoclopramide in controlling nausea and vomiting equaled or exceeded that of ondansetron.

Ectopic corticotropin syndrome and small-cell carcinoma of the lung. Clinical features, outcome, and complications

BACKGROUND

Ectopic corticotropin syndrome is a rare complication of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). There is little information concerning this syndrome available in the literature. We therefore reviewed all cases of ectopic corticotropin syndrome seen at our institution during a 20-year period.

METHODS

Cases were identified by searching a computerized database and reviewing the charts of all 840 patients with SCLC seen between 1971 and 1991. Patients were included if they met at least two of the following criteria: spontaneous hypokalemia (potassium level, < 3.2 mmol/L); plasma cortisol level greater than 600 nmol/L; 24-hour urinary free cortisol level greater than 400 nmol/d; and plasma corticotropin level greater than 22 pmol/L. Data were abstracted from the patients' medical records.

RESULTS

Of 840 patients with SCLC, 14 (1.6%) had ectopic corticotropin production. This was diagnosed at the time of presentation with SCLC in seven patients and from 3 to 19 months later in the remainder. Five patients had limited disease and nine had extensive disease. One or more features of Cushing's syndrome were observed in 57% of patients, but the entire syndrome occurred rarely. Spontaneous hypokalemia was present in all patients, and 10 patients (71%) had hyperglycemia. There were two complete responses and one partial response to chemotherapy, giving an overall response rate of 21%, and the median survival was 5.5 months. Ten patients died of progressive growth of tumor, while three patients died of infections. In one other patient, infection probably contributed to death. A high rate of nonfatal infections was also seen.

CONCLUSIONS

The occurrence of SCLC with ectopic corticotropin syndrome is associated with poor survival, and a high incidence of infective complications, in patients treated with chemotherapy.

A randomised, double-blind comparison of granisetron with high-dose metoclopramide, dexamethasone and diphenhydramine for cisplatin-induced emesis. An NCI Canada Clinical Trials Group Phase III Trial

151 patients (149 evaluable) receiving their first course of chemotherapy containing cisplatin in a dose of at least 50 mg/m2 were randomised to receive either a single dose of intravenous granisetron 80 micrograms/kg or intravenous metoclopramide 2 mg/kg every 2 h for five doses plus a single dose of dexamethasone 10 mg and diphenhydramine. After 24 h, there was no significant difference between groups with respect to nausea or vomiting: in the granisetron group 46% of patients had no emesis, versus 44% of the standard group. Granisetron is an antiemetic agent with efficacy similar to that of high-dose metoclopramide plus dexamethasone.

A pilot study of intensive cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and fluorouracil in patients with axillary node positive or locally advanced breast cancer

A multicentre pilot study has been conducted to determine an intensive regimen of cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil which was tolerable and acceptable to patients with node positive breast cancer. Consecutive patients with operable axillary node positive breast cancer (T1-3, N1-2, M0), 266 patients, or locally advanced breast cancer (T4), 22 patients, were treated with cyclophosphamide post-operatively for 14 days and epirubicin and fluorouracil, both intravenously on days 1 and 8. Each cycle was repeated monthly for 6 months. Dosages were increased according to predetermined guidelines. Outcome measures were admission to hospital for febrile neutropenia and change in cardiac function as assessed by radionuclide angiography. The first 46 patients were treated at the doses of cyclophosphamide = 75 mg/m2, epirubicin = 50 mg/m2, fluorouracil = 375 mg/m2 (level 1), then 42 patients at cyclophosphamide = 75 mg/m2, epirubicin = 50 mg/m2 and fluorouracil = 500 mg/m2 (level 2), 69 patients at cyclophosphamide = 75 mg/m2, epirubicin = 60 mg/m2, and fluorouracil = 500 mg/m2 (level 3), and 42 patients at cyclophosphamide = 75 mg/m2, epirubicin = 70 mg/m2, and fluorouracil = 500 mg/m2 with concurrent antibiotics (level 4). The rates of febrile neutropenia were 8.7% (level 1), 7.1% (level 2), 18.8% (level 3), and 31% (level 4), respectively, P = 0.002. Accrual to level 4 was discontinued according to study guidelines and a further 89 patients were recruited at level 3 dosages with antibiotic prophylaxis (level 3a), resulting in a 5.6% rate of febrile neutropenia. The difference in febrile neutropenia rates between levels 3 and 3a was statistically significant. There were no toxic deaths and 2 cases of heart failure. In conclusion, through a careful dose-finding study in patients with operable or locally advanced breast cancer, an intensive epirubicin-containing adjuvant regimen has been established which is presently being compared with standard CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil) chemotherapy in a randomised trial. In addition, this study suggests that antibiotic prophylaxis reduces the risk of febrile neutropenia in breast cancer patients receiving intensive chemotherapy.

The Canadian experience with intensive fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide in patients with early stage breast cancer

A multicentre dose-finding pilot study was conducted to determine an intensive regimen of fluorouracil (F), epirubicin (E) plus cyclophosphamide (C) [FEC] that was tolerable and acceptable to patients with node-positive operable (n = 266) or locally advanced (n = 22) breast cancer. Consecutive patients were treated with fluorouracil and epirubicin administered intravenously on days 1 and 8, in addition to cyclophosphamide orally for 14 days. Chemotherapy cycles were repeated at monthly intervals for 6 months, and dosages were increased according to a predetermined protocol. End-points were hospital admissions due to febrile neutropenia and changes in cardiac function as assessed by radionuclide angiography. The first 46 patients were treated with doses of F = 375 mg/m2, E = 50 mg/m2 and C = 75 mg/m2 (level 1), then 42 patients received F = 500 mg/m2, E = 50 mg/m2 and C = 75 mg/m2 (level 2), 69 patients received F = 500 mg/m2, E = 60 mg/m2 and C = 75 mg/m2 (level 3), and 42 patients received F = 500 mg/m2, E = 70 mg/m2 and C = 75 mg/m2 with concurrent antibiotics (level 4). Rates of febrile neutropenia were 8.7% (level 1), 7.1% (level 2), 18.8% (level 3), and 31% (level 4) [p = 0.002]. Accrual to level 4 was discontinued according to study protocol and a further 89 patients were recruited at level 3 dosages with antibiotic prophylaxis (level 3a), resulting in a 5.6% rate of febrile neutropenia. The difference in febrile neutropenia rates between dosage levels 3 and 3a was statistically significant (p = 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The evaluation of analgesic effects in cancer patients as exemplified by a double-blind, crossover study of immediate-release versus controlled-release morphine

We compared the effects of controlled-release and immediate-release morphine preparations in adult patients with moderate-to-severe cancer pain and report methodologic approaches to pain evaluation. The study consisted of a two-phase randomized crossover trial preceded by a titration phase; all phases were conducted under double-blind conditions. To evaluate pain intensity, a visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Present Pain Intensity scale of the McGill Pain Questionnaire were used. Additional morphine solution for breakthrough pain was used as an outcome measure. Pain was evaluated nine times daily, which permitted correlation of pain scores with the pharmacokinetic patterns of the test drugs. Side effects were rated once daily, using a scale from 0 to 3. To assess the relative importance of side effects, a toxicity index was designed based on both the intensity and duration of each side effect. The overall VAS pain scores during treatment with controlled-release and immediate-release morphine were 1.3 (SD = 0.1) and 1.4 (SD = 0.2), respectively. Use of supplemental morphine solution for breakthrough pain expressed as the percentage of the daily dose of the test drug was 5.5% for the controlled-release drug and 10.9% for the immediate-release drug. Differences in pain scores, side effects, and supplemental morphine requirement between the two groups were not significant. We discuss methodologic issues in double-blind clinical trials of analgesics, in particular the validity of "Patient Preference" as an outcome measure and problems related to the titration phase.

[Not Available]

Any new publication brings with it a source of reference, a revitalisation and an opportunity for change. Therefore, it is invigorating for accident and emergency nurses to have this supplement dedicated to our specialty.

A randomized, double-blinded study comparing six doses of batanopride (BMY-25801) with methylprednisolone in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy

Several agents in a new class of antiemetic compounds, 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT3) antagonists, have shown promise as effective antiemetics with fewer side effects than metoclopramide. One of these agents, batanopride, produced no severe toxicity at doses that prevented emesis due to chemotherapy in early Phase I trials. We conducted a randomized, double-blinded, 7 arm clinical trial to: (1) identify the presence of a dose-response for complete protection from emesis, and (2) compare batanopride with a standard antiemetic, methylprednisolone if a dose-response was found not to exist. Prior to chemotherapy, six patient groups each received a single intravenous dose of batanopride ranging from 0.2 to 6.0 mg/kg whereas a seventh group received methylprednisolone 250 mg intravenously. Chemotherapy-naïve cancer patients scheduled to receive moderately emetogenic chemotherapy were eligible. Primary treatment outcomes that were recorded and analyzed included the number of episodes of emesis, the time to the first episode of emesis as well as the frequency and severity of nausea. Two hundred and eight patients accrued between April 1989 and February 1990 were evaluable for response. A significant dose-response effect for complete protection from emesis was not seen over the first 24 hours after chemotherapy (p = 0.102). However, a linear dose-response effect for time to first emesis was evident in a multivariate analysis (p = 0.029). While the highest batanopride dose group was associated with a higher complete protection rate (CPR) than the control group, this group also exhibited a higher incidence of diarrhea (p = 0.013), hypotension, and electrocardiographic abnormalities.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Small-cell carcinoma of the lung: derivation of a prognostic staging system

Retrospective data on 22 pretreatment attributes were evaluated in 614 patients with small-cell carcinoma of the lung (SCCL). The series included 284 patients with limited disease (LD) and 328 patients with extensive disease (ED) managed between 1974 and 1986. Prognostic factors were evaluated by univariate analysis and by the Cox multivariate regression model. Recursive partition and amalgamation algorithm (RECPAM), two clustering methods well suited for obtaining strata and adapted for censoring survival data, were developed and used in the formulation of a new prognostic staging system. In univariate analysis, prognosis was significantly influenced by extent of disease (DE), the number of metastatic sites, and the detection of mediastinal spread in LD. Poor performance status (PS), male sex, and advanced age were negatively correlated with survival, as were increased serum levels of alkaline phosphates (AP), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), total WBC count (WBCC), and low platelet count and low serum sodium. The Cox model identified plasma LDH and mediastinal spread as the only significant factors in LD; the influence of PS, number of metastatic sites, bone metastasis, brain metastasis, and platelet count were identified as significant in ED. The RECPAM model identified four distinct risk groups defined in a classification tree by the following eight attributes: DE, PS, serum AP, serum LDH, mediastinal spread, sex, WBCC, and liver metastasis. The four groups were distinguished by median survival times of 59, 49, 35, and 24 weeks, respectively (P = .0001). Interactions among prognostic factors are emphasized in the RECPAM classification model as evidenced by reassignment of patients across conventional staging barriers into alternate prognostic groups. The advantages of using RECPAM over the more conventional Cox regression techniques for a new staging system are discussed.

Superiority of granisetron to dexamethasone plus prochlorperazine in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced emesis

Trials of selective 5-hydroxytryptamine3 receptor antagonists have shown excellent antiemetic activity for chemotherapy containing cisplatin when compared with high-dose metoclopramide. There is little information about the efficacy of these new agents for chemotherapy other than for high-dose cisplatin. We performed a double-blind, randomized trial comparing a single dose of the 5-hydroxytryptamine3 receptor antagonist granisetron (BRL 43694A) as a single intravenous dose with dexamethasone plus prochlorperazine in 152 patients receiving their first course of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (mainly doxorubicin- and cyclophosphamide-containing combinations). During the first 24 hours, there was a statistically significant advantage for the granisetron group in terms of the prevention of both nausea and emesis. There was no difference in the frequency of reported adverse events. We conclude that granisetron is more effective than dexamethasone plus prochlorperazine in patients who are receiving moderately emetogenic cytotoxic agents.