Correlation between changes in nutritional status and tumor response in patients receiving immunotherapy for lung cancer (NUTIMMUNO study)

Malnutrition is a common condition in lung cancer, and it is an independent prognostic factor. The main objective of this study was to determine whether an early improvement at 3 months in the nutritional status (NS) of patients undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) is associated with a tumor response to treatment at 6-month follow-up. The clinical data of 106 patients initiating ICI for bronchopulmonary non-small cell lung cancer (NCSLC) were retrospectively reviewed. NS was defined according to the HAS 2019 recommendation, depending on BMI, percentage of weight loss, and albuminemia. NS was assessed at baseline (M0) and 3 months (M3) after ICI treatment initiation according to 3 categories: well-nourished, malnourished, and very malnourished. The NS evolution of the 92 patients who were still alive at 3 months was determined. The proportion of patients with malnutrition at M0 and M3 was 39.6% and 43.3%. Median follow-up was 18.7 months. OS and PFS were longer for patients in the M0 well-nourished group than in the malnourished and very malnourished groups. Patients who remained well-nourished had a significantly better ICI success rate at 6 months than patients who remained malnourished or improved or deteriorated their NS. OS was significantly longer for remaining well-nourished patients compared to the amelioration group and the degradation group. PFS was not significantly modified between the 4 evolution groups. Maintaining good NS during the first months of ICI treatment leads to better OS and objective response rate than remaining malnourished or early deteriorating NS. However, an early improvement in NS does not seem to predict a good tumor response to treatment and not a better OS either.

Cetuximab versus methotrexate in first-line treatment of older, frail patients with inoperable recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer (ELAN UNFIT): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

At present, there is no established standard treatment for frail older patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of cetuximab to those of methotrexate (the reference regimen) in this population.

METHODS

This randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial was done at 20 hospitals in France. Patients aged 70 years or older, assessed as frail by the ELAN Geriatric Evaluation, with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in the first-line setting and with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2 were eligible for inclusion. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive cetuximab 500 mg/m2 intravenously every 2 weeks or methotrexate 40 mg/m2 intravenously every week, with minimisation by ECOG performance status, type of disease evolution, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, serum albumin concentration, and geriatrician consultation. To avoid deterministic minimisation and assure allocation concealment, patients were allocated with a probability of 0·80 to the treatment that most reduced the imbalance. Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, whichever occurred first. The primary endpoint was failure-free survival (defined as the time from randomisation to disease progression, death, discontinuation of treatment, or loss of 2 or more points on the Activities in Daily Living scale, whichever occurred first) and was analysed in the intention-to-treat population. 151 failures expected out of 164 patients were required to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0·625 with 0·05 alpha error, with 80% power. A futility interim analysis was planned when approximately 80 failures were observed, based on failure-free survival. Safety analyses included all patients who received at least one dose of the study drug. This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01884623) and was stopped for futility after the interim analysis.

FINDINGS

Between Nov 7, 2013, and April 23, 2018, 82 patients were enrolled (41 to the cetuximab group and 41 to the methotrexate group); 60 (73%) were male, 37 (45%) were aged 80 years or older, 35 (43%) had an ECOG performance status of 2, and 36 (44%) had metastatic disease. Enrolment was stopped for futility at the interim analysis. At the final analysis, median follow-up was 43·3 months (IQR 30·8-52·1). At data cutoff, all 82 patients had failure; failure-free survival did not differ significantly between the groups (median 1·4 months [95% CI 1·0-2·1] in the cetuximab group vs 1·9 months [1·1-2·6] in the methotrexate group; adjusted HR 1·03 [95% CI 0·66-1·61], p=0·89). The frequency of patients who had grade 3 or worse adverse events was 63% (26 of 41) in the cetuximab group and 73% (30 of 41) in the methotrexate group. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events in the cetuximab group were fatigue (four [10%] of 41 patients), lung infection (four [10%]), and rash acneiform (four [10%]), and those in the methotrexate group were fatigue (nine [22%] of 41), increased gamma-glutamyltransferase (seven [17%]), natraemia disorder (four [10%]), anaemia (four [10%]), leukopenia (four [10%]), and neutropenia (four [10%]). The frequency of patients who had serious adverse events was 44% (18 of 41) in the cetuximab group and 39% (16 of 41) in the methotrexate group. Four patients presented with a fatal adverse event in the cetuximab group (sepsis, decreased level of consciousness, pulmonary oedema, and death of unknown cause) as did two patients in the methotrexate group (dyspnoea and death of unknown cause).

INTERPRETATION

The study showed no improvement in failure-free survival with cetuximab versus methotrexate. Patients with an ECOG performance status of 2 did not benefit from these systemic therapies. New treatment options including immunotherapy should be explored in frail older patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, after an initial geriatric evaluation, such as the ELAN Geriatric Evaluation.

FUNDING

French programme PAIR-VADS 2011 (sponsored by the National Cancer Institute, the Fondation ARC and the Ligue Contre le Cancer), GEMLUC, GEFLUC, and Merck Santé.

TRANSLATION

For the French translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Avelumab for platinum-ineligible/refractory recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: phase Ib results from the JAVELIN Solid Tumor trial

Background

Recurrent and/or metastatic (R/M) disease develops in approximately 65% of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) and is associated with a poor prognosis. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have proven effective in multiple tumor types, including R/M SCCHN. We report the efficacy and safety of avelumab (antiprogrammed death ligand 1 antibody) in an expansion cohort of patients with platinum-refractory/ineligible R/M SCCHN enrolled in the phase I JAVELIN Solid Tumor trial (NCT01772004).

Methods

Eligible patients with R/M SCCHN were aged ≥18 years and had received ≥1 line of platinum-based chemotherapy with disease progression or recurrence within 6 months of the last dose or were ineligible for platinum-based chemotherapy. All patients received avelumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks. Tumor assessments were carried out by a blinded independent review committee (IRC) and investigators according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors V.1.1 (RECIST 1.1). Key endpoints included best overall response, duration of response (DOR) and progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by IRC and investigator per RECIST 1.1, overall survival (OS), and safety.

Results

Between April 24, 2015, and November 13, 2015, 153 patients were enrolled. Patients had a median of two prior lines of therapy for metastatic or locally advanced disease (range 0–6); 12 patients (7.8%) were not eligible for platinum-based chemotherapy. At data cut-off (December 31, 2017), the confirmed objective response rate was 9.2% (95% CI 5.1% to 14.9%) assessed by IRC and 13.1% (95% CI 8.2% to 19.5%) assessed by investigator. Median DOR was not reached (95% CI 4.2 to not estimable) based on IRC assessment. Median PFS was 1.4 months (95% CI 1.4 to 2.6) assessed by IRC and 1.8 months (95% CI 1.4 to 2.7) assessed by investigator; median OS was 8.0 months (95% CI 6.5 to 10.2). Any-grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 83 patients (54.2%) and were grade ≥3 in 10 patients (6.5%). The most common TRAEs were fatigue (n=19, 12.4%), fever (n=14, 9.2%), pruritus (n=12, 7.8%), and chills (n=11, 7.2%), and there were no treatment-related deaths.

Conclusion

Avelumab showed clinical activity and was associated with a low rate of grade ≥3 TRAEs in heavily pretreated patients with platinum-refractory/ineligible R/M SCCHN.

Cetuximab, docetaxel, and cisplatin versus platinum, fluorouracil, and cetuximab as first-line treatment in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma (GORTEC 2014-01 TPExtreme): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Results from a phase 2 trial of the TPEx chemotherapy regimen (docetaxel-platinum-cetuximab) showed promising results, with a median overall survival of 14·0 months in first-line recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma (HNSCC). We therefore aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of the TPEx regimen with the standard of care EXTREME regimen (platinum-fluorouracil-cetuximab) in this setting.

METHODS

This was a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial, done in 68 centres (cancer centres, university and general hospitals, and private clinics) in France, Spain, and Germany. Eligible patients were aged 18-70 years with histologically confirmed recurrent or metastatic HNSCC unsuitable for curative treatment; had at least one measurable lesion according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1; and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 1 or less. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) using the TenAlea website by investigators or delegated clinical research associates to the TPEx regimen or the EXTREME regimen, with minimisation by ECOG performance status, type of disease evolution, previous cetuximab treatment, and country. The TPEx regimen consisted of docetaxel 75 mg/m² and cisplatin 75 mg/m², both intravenously on day 1, and cetuximab on days 1, 8, and 15 (intravenously 400 mg/m² on day 1 of cycle 1 and 250 mg/m² weekly subsequently). Four cycles were repeated every 21 days with systematic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support at each cycle. In case of disease control after four cycles, intravenous cetuximab 500 mg/m² was continued every 2 weeks as maintenance therapy until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The EXTREME regimen consisted of fluorouracil 4000 mg/m² on day 1-4, cisplatin 100 mg/m² on day 1, and cetuximab on days 1, 8, and 15 (400 mg/m² on day 1 of cycle 1 and 250 mg/m² weekly subsequently) all delivered intravenously. Six cycles were delivered every 21 days followed by weekly 250 mg/m² cetuximab as maintenance therapy in case of disease control. G-CSF support was not mandatory per the protocol in the EXTREME regimen. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population; safety was analysed in all patients who received at least one dose of chemotherapy or cetuximab. Enrolment is closed and this is the final analysis. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02268695.

FINDINGS

Between Oct 10, 2014, and Nov 29, 2017, 541 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the two treatment regimens (271 to TPEx, 270 to EXTREME). Two patients in the TPEx group had major deviations in consent forms and were not included in the final analysis. Median follow-up was 34·4 months (IQR 26·6-44·8) in the TPEx group and 30·2 months (25·5-45·3) in the EXTREME group. At data cutoff, 209 patients had died in the TPEx group and 218 had died in the EXTREME group. Overall survival did not differ significantly between the groups (median 14·5 months [95% CI 12·5-15·7] in the TPEx group and 13·4 months [12·2-15·4] in the EXTREME group; hazard ratio 0·89 [95% CI 0·74-1·08]; p=0·23). 214 (81%) of 263 patients in the TPEx group versus 246 (93%) of 265 patients in the EXTREME group had grade 3 or worse adverse events during chemotherapy (p<0·0001). In the TPEx group, 118 (45%) of 263 patients had at least one serious adverse event versus 143 (54%) of 265 patients in the EXTREME group. 16 patients in the TPEx group and 21 in the EXTREME group died in association with adverse events, including seven patients in each group who had fatal infections (including febrile neutropenia). Eight deaths in the TPEx group and 11 deaths in the EXTREME group were assessed as treatment related, most frequently sepsis or septic shock (four in each treatment group).

INTERPRETATION

Although the trial did not meet its primary endpoint, with no significant improvement in overall survival with TPEx versus EXTREME, the TPEx regimen had a favourable safety profile. The TPEx regimen could provide an alternative to standard of care with the EXTREME regimen in the first-line treatment of patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC, especially for those who might not be good candidates for up-front pembrolizumab treatment.

FUNDING

Merck Santé and Chugai Pharma.

Nutrition and physical activity: French intergroup clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up (SNFGE, FFCD, GERCOR, UNICANCER, SFCD, SFED, SFRO, ACHBT, AFC, SFP-APA, SFNCM, AFSOS)

This document is a summary of the French intergroup guidelines regarding the nutrition and physical activity (PA) management in digestive oncology. This collaborative work was produced under the auspices of all French medical and surgical societies involved in digestive oncology, nutrition and supportive care. It is based on published guidelines, recent literature review and expert opinions. Recommendations are graded according to the level of evidence. Malnutrition affects more than half of patients with digestive cancers and is often underdiagnosed. It has multiple negative consequences on survival, quality of life and risk of treatment complications. Consequently, in addition to anticancer treatments, supportive care including nutritional support and PA plays a central role in the management of digestive cancers. It is crucial to detect malnutrition (diagnostic criteria updated in 2019) early, to prevent it and to act against it at all stages of the cancer and at all times of the care pathway. In this context, we proposed recommendations for the evaluation and management in nutrition and PA in digestive oncology for each stage of the disease (perioperative setting, during radiation therapy, during systemic treatments, at the palliative phase, after cancer). Guidelines for nutrition and PA management aim at increasing awareness about malnutrition in oncology. They are continuously evolving and need to be regularly updated.

Effect of Flavor Enhancement on the Appreciation of Food in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy

Objectives

Given the influence of sensory signals on food intake regulation and the subsequent nutritional status, it is important to reduce the impact of commonly observed smell and taste alterations on the pleasure of eating during chemotherapy. This study aimed to examine the effect of various types of flavor enhancement on the appreciation of an appetizer by a group of patients undergoing chemotherapy.

Methods

Five eggplant appetizers with no seasoning (REF) or enhanced with either salt, lemon, garlic or cumin were developed. In this cross-sectional study, 36 healthy female subjects (age 58 ± 7 y) (control group) and 84 breast cancer patients (age 56 ± 11 y) treated with chemotherapy were recruited. A hierarchical cluster analysis based on patients' self-reported smell and taste abilities classified the patients in two groups: the ‘unaltered, (high sensory abilities) n = 49’ and the ‘altered, (poor sensory abilities), n = 35’ group. Participants tasted and assessed the appreciation of the reference appetizer on a visual analog scale and performed a randomized comparative liking task, by rating the appreciation for each flavor-enhanced appetizer relative to the REF (one-sample t-test).

Results

There was no significant difference in the appreciation of the REF appetizer between the three groups (P &gt; 0.05). In the comparative liking task, the control group rated similarly the appreciation between the flavor-enhanced and the REF appetizers except for the cumin-enhanced appetizer, which was appreciated significantly more than the REF (P &lt; 0.001). Patients in both ‘altered’ and ‘unaltered’ groups appreciated similarly the cumin appetizer (P &gt; 0.05), more the salt and garlic-enhanced appetizers (P ≤ 0.001, P = 0.005, respectively) and significantly less the lemon-enhanced appetizer relative to the REF (P = 0.029), confirming a tendency for patients to reject acid-flavored foods.

Conclusions

The salt and garlic enhancements were appreciated by the patients independent of the stage of chemotherapy or the severity of smell and taste alterations. Flavor enhancement seems a good strategy to maintain the pleasure of eating in patients undergoing chemotherapy. Further research is still needed on the appreciation and intake of a complete meal (starter, main course, dessert).

Funding Sources

APICIL and ELIOR groups.

TPExtreme randomized trial: Quality of Life (QoL) and survival according to second-line treatments in patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC)

6507

Background: TPExtreme trial comparing EXTREME regimen to the taxane-based TPEx confirmed the encouraging survival results of the TPEx regimen, despite lack of significant overall survival (OS) increase, with a significantly lower toxicity than the EXTREME regimen. Herein, the QoL and exploratory analyses of survival according to 2nd line treatments focusing on immunotherapy (IO) are presented. Methods: Randomized (1:1), open-label trial. Main inclusion criteria were R/M HNSCC not suitable for loco-regional treatment, age 18-70 years, PS < 2, creatinin clearance > 60ml/min, prior cisplatin < 300 mg/m². 539 pts were enrolled over a period of 37 months (mo). QoL was evaluated with QLQ-C30 questionnaire at baseline, week(W)12, W18, W26 and analyzed by linear mixed model. The primary QoL endpoint was the Global Health Status score. 2nd line treatments were collected for 501 (93%) patients (pts), 256 in the EXTREME arm and 245 in the TPEx arm. Results: The percentage of QLQ-C30 questionnaires filled at baseline, W12, W18 and W26 were similar in the 2 arms, 89%, 52%, 43%, and 39% in the EXTREME arm and 91%, 59%, 40%, and 37% in the TPEx arm, respectively.. Higher scores of Global Health Status (p = 0.02), physical functioning (p = 0.009) and role functioning (p = 0.013) and lower scores of appetite loss (p = 0.041) were observed in the TPEx arm than in the EXTREME arm. No significant difference was observed for the other scores. In 2nd line treatment, 120 (47%) pts in the EXTREME arm and 109 (44%) in the TPEx arm received chemotherapy +/- cetuximab (CT); 41 (16%) pts in the EXTREME arm and 41 (17%) in the TPEx arm received IO, mainly anti-PD-1/PD-L1. 79% and 85% of these 2nd line treatments were given after progression in EXTREME and TPEx arms respectively. Median OS (95%CI) since randomization was 17.6 (15.2 – 19.5) mo with CT and 19.4 (13.4 – 22.3) mo with IO in the EXTREME arm vs 14.9 (13.0 – 16.3) and 21.9 (15.9 – 35.0) mo in the TPEx arm (interaction test p = 0.077) respectively. Median OS since start of 2nd line was 9.3 mo with CT and 8.3 mo with IO in the EXTREME arm, and 7.1 and 11.6 mo respectively in the TPEx arm. Conclusions: An improvement in the QoL of patients was observed in the TPEx arm compared to that of the EXTREME arm. Exploratory analysis showed that the taxane-based TPEx regimen followed by IO in 2nd line could provide interesting median OS for pts who need CT in 1st line, with less toxicity than EXTREME. This sequential treatment deserves to be compared to a strategy that starts with Platinum+5FU+pembrolizumab. Clinical trial information: NCT02268695 .

Prostate cancer with oligometastatic relapse: Combining stereotactic ablative radiotherapy and durvalumab, a randomized phase II trial (POSTCARD - GETUG-P13)

TPS5088

Background: Following Stereotactic Body RadioTherapy (SBRT) targeting prostate cancer (PCa) oligometastasis, a tumor response assessed by PSA decrease is observed in a majority of case. To increase this tumor response, immune targeting agents can be combined with SBRT. We hypothesize that the anti-PDL1 agent Durvalumab will enhance immune response following SBRT targeting oligometastatic lesions. In this multicenter randomized phase II trial, we therefore propose to assess the comparative efficacy of SBRT with or without Durvalumab (MEDI4736) in oligometastatic recurrent hormone sensitive prostate cancer patients. Methods: Patients with PCa were eligible if they had a biochemical recurrence following treatment with curative intent, with a maximum of 5 bone or lymph node metastases, seen only on FCH-PET CT or Ga-PSMA PET CT, not seen on conventional imaging assessments (bone scan or thorax, abdomen and pelvis CT scan). Main exclusion criteria are serum testosterone level < 8.5 nmol/ml, PSA doubling time less than 6 months, lung, brain, liver or other visceral metastases, any prior immune therapy. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to either SBRT + Durvalumab, or SBRT alone, with a stratification by investigation center, and number of metastases (1 vs 2-5). Durvalumab (1500 mg/cycle) will be started one month prior to SBRT to be able to evaluate PSA and immune response to the drug. It will be combined with SBRT (3x 9 or 3 x 11 Gy) and then given adjuvantly until progression with a maximum of 12 months. Ninety-six patients will be recruited in 15 centers over a recruitment period of 2.5 years. The primary endpoint is two-year Progression-free survival. Secondary objectives include quality of life, androgen deprivation therapy free survival, prostate cancer specific survival, overall survival, time to first symptomatic event, acute and late toxicity. Patients in both groups will be observed for PSA progression every 3 months after random assignment, with confirming imaging at PSA progression. Clinical trial information: NCT03795207.

TPExtreme randomized trial: TPEx versus Extreme regimen in 1st line recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC)

6002

Background: After promising results from the GORTEC TPEx phase II trial, the role of taxane instead of 5FU in 1st-line R/M HNSCC chemotherapy (CT) remained to be confirmed by comparing TPEx to the reference EXTREME regimen. Methods: Randomized (1:1), open-label trial. Main inclusion criteria were R/M HNSCC not suitable for locoregional treatment, age 18-70 years, PS <2, creatinine clearance >60ml/min, prior cisplatin <300 mg/m². Reference EXTREME regimen (arm A: 6 cycles every 3 weeks (Q3W) of 5FU–cisplatin-cetuximab (cetux) followed by weekly cetux maintenance) was compared to TPEx regimen (arm B: 4 cycles Q3W of docetaxel 75mg/m²–cisplatin 75mg/m²- cetux 250mg/m² with mandatory G-CSF support followed by every 2W cetux 500mg/m² maintenance). The primary endpoint was Overall Survival (OS). To detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.72 (median OS increase from 10.1 to 14.0 months (mo) with 88% power, 2-sided significance level of 0.05, 374 deaths were required. 540 patients (pts) were planned to enroll. Results: 539 pts were enrolled in 37 mo. Median age was 60 years, 93% were smokers, 40% had oropharyngeal tumor (p16 or HPV DNA was done in 85%, positive in 28%). In arm A, 44% of pts received all CT cycles vs 72% in arm B. Delays in administration were more frequent in arm A (27% vs 10%). Cisplatin was more frequently switched to carboplatin in arm A (34% vs 9%). Toxicity was lower in arm B: 34% pts had grade ≥4 adverse events during CT in arm B vs 50% in arm A (p<0.001). Less pts in arm A started maintenance than in arm B (53% vs 73%). At time of analysis, the median follow-up duration was 30 mo and 406 pts had died. OS was not significantly different between arms: HR=0.87 (95%CI: 0.71-1.05), p=0.15. Median OS was 13.4 mo in arm A vs 14.5 in arm B. 2-year OS rate was 21.0% in arm A vs 28.6% in arm B. Conclusions: This large randomized trial confirmed the encouraging survival results of the TPEx regimen observed in the first phase II. OS in both arms was higher than observed in previous randomized CT or immunotherapy combination trials. Despite lack of significant OS increase, taxane based TPEx regimen appears to be a new option in 1st line R/M HNSCC, with a shorter time on CT and significantly lower toxicity than the EXTREME regimen. Clinical trial information: NCT02268695.

Outcome of patients malnourished at diagnosis of a metastatic lung adenocarcinoma

213

Background: The objective of this retrospective study was to assess the impact of malnutrition in patients treated in 2012 at the Integrated Center for Oncology René Gauducheau (Nantes, France) by palliative platinium based chemotherapy and pemetrexed for a lung adenocarcinoma. We studied toxicities of chemotherapy, overall survival of patients, nutritional support and outcome of the patients. Methods: We determined for these patients if they were malnourished or well-nourished at diagnosis (as defined by a weight loss > 5% in 1 month or > 10% in 6 months, or a body mass index ≤ 18.5 under 70 years old or < 21 after 70 years old, or hypoalbuminemia < 30 g/L under 70 years old or < 35 g/L after 70 years old). Results: Among the 48 patients eligible for study, 15 were not included because it was impossible to determine if they were malnourished or not; 14 patients were malnourished at diagnosis and 19 patients were well-nourished. Other than in cases of anorexia, malnourished patients didn’t experience more adverse effects of chemotherapy. Treatment response was equal in the two groups. The median overall survival was shorter for malnourished patients than for well-nourished patients (8 vs 23 months, p=0,0089, HR 3,747 ; 95% CI : 1,443 – 9,732). Nutritional support was given most frequently to malnourished patients than to well-nourished patients (64,3% vs 21,1%, p=0,0286) and care consisted of counseling for 7,1% of malnourished patients and 10,5% of well-nourished patients and oral supplements for 50% and 10,5% respectively. Enteral feeding was given to one malnourished patient and another one refused it. None received parenteral nutrition. At relapse, well-nourished patients received more lines of chemotherapy than malnourished patients (p=0,0377). Conclusions: Our results suggest that malnourished patients upon diagnosis don’t suffer more side effects from chemotherapy than well-nourished patients. Yet they have poorer overall survival and received less other lines of chemotherapy at relapse. Early nutritional care integrated to support care is required for patients with metastatic lung cancer.

[Cancers and pesticides: current data]

Pesticides are numerous. The occupational exposure to pesticide increases the risk of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and hairy cells leukaemia. Numerous studies suggest an increasing of incidence of children cancer in connection with parental pesticide exposure. But, most of epidemiological studies are not conclusive but of the difficulty to measure the exposure to pesticides. The future epidemiological studies may include toxicological analysis in order to measure the exposure.