Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Gynecologic Malignancies: A Case-Based Radiosurgery Society Practice Review

PURPOSE

The use of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for gynecologic malignancies is controversial. We discuss certain circumstances when highly precise SBRT may be a useful tool to consider in the management of selected patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Case selection included the following scenarios, the first 2 with palliative intent, para-aortic nodal oligorecurrence of ovarian cancer, pelvic sidewall oligorecurrence of cervical cancer, and inoperable endometrial cancer boost after intensity modulated radiation to the pelvis treated with curative intent. Patient characteristics, fractionation, prescription dose, treatment technique, and dose constraints were discussed. Relevant literature to these cases was summarized to provide a framework for treatment of similar patients.

RESULTS

Treatment of gynecologic malignancies with SBRT requires many considerations, including treatment intent, optimal patient selection, fractionation selection, tumor localization, and plan optimization. Although other treatment paradigms including conventionally fractionated radiation therapy and brachytherapy remain the standard-of-care for definitive treatment of gynecologic malignancies, SBRT may have a role in palliative cases or those where high doses are not required due to the unacceptable toxicity that may occur with SBRT.

CONCLUSIONS

A case-based practice review was developed by the Radiosurgery Society to provide a practical guide to the common scenarios noted above affecting patients with gynecologic malignancies.

The impact of a positive COVID-19 test on timeliness of radiation in patients receiving brachytherapy

BACKGROUND

Delays in initiating and completing brachytherapy may have adverse oncologic outcomes for patients with cervical, uterine, and prostate cancer. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on brachytherapy in the United States has not been well-characterized.

OBJECTIVES

We aim to evaluate how a positive COVID-19 test affected timeliness of treatment for patients undergoing brachytherapy for cervical, uterine, and prostate cancer.

METHODS

We queried the National Cancer Database to identify patients diagnosed with cervical, uterine, and prostate cancer in 2019 and 2020 who received brachytherapy in their treatment. Patients who tested positive for COVID-19 between cancer diagnosis and start of radiation were compared to those who did not test positive for COVID-19. Time in days from cancer diagnosis to initiation of radiation was compared using two-sample t-tests with p < 0.05 signifying significant differences.

RESULTS

We identified 38,341 patients with cervical (n = 6,925), uterine (n = 18,587), and prostate cancer (n = 12,829). Rates of COVID-19 positivity were cervical cancer (n = 135; 2%), uterine cancer (n = 236; 1.3%), and prostate cancer (n = 141; 1%). Of those, 35% of cervical, 49% of uterine, and 43% of prostate cancer patients tested positive between their cancer diagnosis and initiation of radiation. Median days to radiation was significantly longer in these patients: 78 versus 51 for cervical cancer (p < 0.01), 150 versus 104 for uterine cancer (p < 0.01), and 154 versus 124 for prostate cancer (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with cervical, uterine, and prostate cancer diagnosed between 2019-2020, testing positive for COVID-19 after their cancer diagnosis was associated with a delay to initiation of radiation by 4-7 weeks.

2023 FIGO staging system for endometrial cancer: The evolution of the revolution

INTRODUCTION

Embracing the complex and diverse nature of the heterogenous group of malignancies that are included under the umbrella of "endometrial cancer" (EC) to better align prognosis with treatment recommendations, requires a more comprehensive staging system. Our goal at the development of the new FIGO staging was to provide 1) high accuracy in the predictive prognosis for a patient with EC, which is the genuine purpose of a staging system, and 2) identification of distinct treatment relevant subgroups. Since the publication of the 2009 staging system by the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 14  years ago (1, 2), our understanding of the biology and natural history of EC has undergone a radical transformation. The TGCA results in 2013 (3), and the many validation reports published since then (4-9), have taught us that "EC" is composed of at least four distinct molecularly defined diseases. Strong histopathologic markers reflecting tumor biology such as lymph vascular space invasion (LVSI) were identified. Importantly, anatomical borders were shown to lose their prognostic relevance for EC patients in the presence of dominant tumor biology-markers such as molecular subtypes/LVSI (10, 11). This emphasizes the integration of these novel markers into a prognostic staging system that aims to be relevant to patients. The 2023 FIGO staging system for EC harmonizes and integrates old and new knowledge on anatomic, histopathologic, and molecular features (12). It requires a change in our perception of a staging system, from a traditional purely anatomical borders-based system to an integrated staging system integrating anatomical borders and tumor biology as pivotal prognostic factors for EC patients while providing important information for treatment decision making. Therefore, the 2023 FIGO staging system demonstrates the logical next step in the evolution of the revolution in a patient-centric staging approach. Below, we elucidate the rationale for the FIGO 2023 endometrial cancer staging system.

Verification of surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT) alignment for proton breast and chest wall patients by comparison to CT-on-rails and kV-2D alignment

BACKGROUND

Surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT) systems have been widely installed and utilized on linear accelerators. However, the use of SGRT with proton therapy is still a newly developing field, and published reports are currently very limited.

PURPOSE

To assess the clinical application and alignment agreement of SGRT with CT-on-rails (CTOR) and kV-2D image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) for breast treatment using proton therapy.

METHODS

Four patients receiving breast or chest wall treatment with proton therapy were the subjects of this study. Patient #1's IGRT modalities were a combination of kV-2D and CTOR. CTOR was the only imaging modality for patients #2 and #3, and kV-2D was the only imaging modality for patient #4. The patients' respiratory motions were assessed using a 2-min surface position recorded by the SGRT system during treatment. SGRT offsets reported after IGRT shifts were recorded for each fraction of treatment. The agreement between SGRT and either kV-2D or CTOR was evaluated.

RESULTS

The respiratory motion amplitude was <4 mm in translation and <2.0° in rotation for all patients. The mean and maximum amplitude of SGRT offsets after application of IGRT shifts were ≤(2.6 mm, 1.6° ) and (6.8 mm, 4.5° ) relative to kV-2D-based IGRT; ≤(3.0 mm, 2.6° ) and (5.0 mm, 4.7° ) relative to CTOR-based IGRT without breast tissue inflammation. For patient #3, breast inflammation was observed for the last three fractions of treatment, and the maximum SGRT offsets post CTOR shifts were up to (14.0 mm, 5.2° ).

CONCLUSIONS

Due to the overall agreement between SGRT and IGRT within reasonable tolerance, SGRT has the potential to serve as a valuable auxiliary IGRT tool for proton breast treatment and may improve the efficiency of proton breast treatment.

Trends in use of radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and combination chemoradiotherapy in advanced uterine cancer before, during, and after GOG 258

OBJECTIVE

To explore the use of Gynecologic Oncology Group 258 (GOG 258) study regimens before, during, and after the study.

METHODS

Patients aged 18 years or older with endometrial cancer between 2004-2019 were identified in the National Cancer Database. Inclusion criteria were stage III or IVA of any histology and stage I-IVA clear cell or serous histologies with positive washings that received adjuvant therapy. Adjuvant therapy use was examined in the pre-GOG 258 era (before 2009), during GOG 258 enrollment and maturation (2010-2017), and after results presentation in 2017 (2018-2019). Two-sided Cochran-Armitage tests, Wilcoxen rank sum tests, and χ2 tests were used for continuous and categorical variables. Multi-variable logistic regression assessed factors associated with the receipt of chemoradiotherapy compared with chemotherapy only or radiation therapy only.

RESULTS

From 2004 to 2019, 41 408 high-risk endometrial cancer patients received adjuvant therapy (12% radiation therapy, 38% chemotherapy, 50% chemoradiotherapy). Chemoradiotherapy increased over the GOG 258 study period (40% before study opening, 54% during enrollment, and 59% after results). Serous (OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.6 to 0.7) and clear cell histology (0.7, 0.6 to 0.8), higher grade (0.8, 0.7 to 0.9), and lymph node positivity (0.8, 0.7 to 0.9) were negatively associated with receipt of chemoradiotherapy compared with single-modality treatment. Non-Hispanic Black ethnicity (0.8, 0.8 to 0.9) and residing ≥50 miles from the treatment facility (0.8, 0.7 to 0.9) were also negatively associated with chemoradiotherapy. Private insurance (1.2, 1.0 to 1.4) and treatment at community hospitals (1.2, 1.2 to 1.3) were positively associated with chemoradiotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Despite the lack of benefit in the GOG 258 experimental arm, chemoradiotherapy use increased during study enrollment and after results publication.

FIGO staging of endometrial cancer: 2023

INTRODUCTION

Many advances in the understanding of the pathologic and molecular features of endometrial cancer have occurred since the FIGO staging was last updated in 2009. Substantially more outcome and biological behavior data are now available regarding the several histological types. Molecular and genetic findings have accelerated since the publication of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data and provide improved clarity on the diverse biological nature of this collection of endometrial cancers and their differing prognostic outcomes. The goals of the new staging system are to better define these prognostic groups and create substages that indicate more appropriate surgical, radiation, and systemic therapies.

METHODS

The FIGO Women's Cancer Committee appointed a Subcommittee on Endometrial Cancer Staging in October 2021, represented by the authors. Since then, the committee members have met frequently and reviewed new and established evidence on the treatment, prognosis, and survival of endometrial cancer. Based on these data, opportunities for improvements in the categorization and stratification of these factors were identified in each of the four stages. Data and analyses from the molecular and histological classifications performed and published in the recently developed ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines were used as a template for adding the new subclassifications to the proposed molecular and histological staging system.

RESULTS

Based on the existing evidence, the substages were defined as follows: Stage I (IA1): non-aggressive histological type of endometrial carcinoma limited to a polyp or confined to the endometrium; (IA2) non-aggressive histological types of endometrium involving less than 50% of the myometrium with no or focal lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) as defined by WHO criteria; (IA3) low-grade endometrioid carcinomas limited to the uterus with simultaneous low-grade endometrioid ovarian involvement; (IB) non-aggressive histological types involving 50% or more of the myometrium with no LVSI or focal LVSI; (IC) aggressive histological types, i.e. serous, high-grade endometrioid, clear cell, carcinosarcomas, undifferentiated, mixed, and other unusual types without any myometrial invasion. Stage II (IIA): non-aggressive histological types that infiltrate the cervical stroma; (IIB) non-aggressive histological types that have substantial LVSI; or (IIC) aggressive histological types with any myometrial invasion. Stage III (IIIA): differentiating between adnexal versus uterine serosa infiltration; (IIIB) infiltration of vagina/parametria and pelvic peritoneal metastasis; and (IIIC) refinements for lymph node metastasis to pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes, including micrometastasis and macrometastasis. Stage IV (IVA): locally advanced disease infiltrating the bladder or rectal mucosa; (IVB) extrapelvic peritoneal metastasis; and (IVC) distant metastasis. The performance of complete molecular classification (POLEmut, MMRd, NSMP, p53abn) is encouraged in all endometrial cancers. If the molecular subtype is known, this is recorded in the FIGO stage by the addition of "m" for molecular classification, and a subscript indicating the specific molecular subtype. When molecular classification reveals p53abn or POLEmut status in Stages I and II, this results in upstaging or downstaging of the disease (IICmp53abn or IAmPOLEmut).

SUMMARY

The updated 2023 staging of endometrial cancer includes the various histological types, tumor patterns, and molecular classification to better reflect the improved understanding of the complex nature of the several types of endometrial carcinoma and their underlying biologic behavior. The changes incorporated in the 2023 staging system should provide a more evidence-based context for treatment recommendations and for the more refined future collection of outcome and survival data.

A practical guide to hybrid interstitial/intracavitary brachytherapy for locally-advanced cervical cancer

PURPOSE

In select cases of locally advanced cervical cancer, a hybrid brachytherapy (HBT) approach consisting of a combined intracavitary (IC)/insterstitial (IS) implant can yield improved target coverage and/or decreased organ at risk dose compared to IC techniques while limiting invasiveness compared to IS techniques.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The technique involves placement of transvaginal and/or perineal needles in addition to the tandem and ring/ovoids using either a specialized applicator or free-hand placement. Following applicator and needle placement, brachytherapy may then be planned using principles similar to IC or IS techniques. During treatment planning, it can be helpful to obtain both MRI and CT imaging, as plastic MRI-compatible needles do not show up well on MRI.

RESULTS

In patients where acceptable target coverage cannot be achieved using IC alone or doses to nearby OAR are too high, HBT should be evaluated. HBT can improve both dose to target and OAR while sparing patients the morbidity of perineal template-based interstitial brachytherapy. Specific scenarios where HBT may be preferred include bulky residual primary tumor especially with poor response to EBRT, extension into the lateral parametrium, vaginal extension of tumor, and an asymmetric target. Use of HBT can typically permit extension of dose coverage by an additional 1-2 cm beyond what can be achieved with an IC alone technique.

CONCLUSION

HBT allows for improved therapeutic ratio by improving target volume coverage and/or lowering doses to OARs. Brachytherapists should be trained on the practical aspects of administering HBT to be able to offer a less invasive and impactful treatment option when appropriate.

FIGO staging of endometrial cancer: 2023

INTRODUCTION

Many advances in the understanding of the pathologic and molecular features of endometrial cancer have occurred since the FIGO staging was last updated in 2009. Substantially more outcome and biological behavior data are now available regarding the several histological types. Molecular and genetic findings have accelerated since the publication of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data and provide improved clarity on the diverse biological nature of this collection of endometrial cancers and their differing prognostic outcomes. The goals of the new staging system are to better define these prognostic groups and create substages that indicate more appropriate surgical, radiation, and systemic therapies.

METHODS

The FIGO Women's Cancer Committee appointed a Subcommittee on Endometrial Cancer Staging in October 2021, represented by the authors. Since then, the committee members have met frequently and reviewed new and established evidence on the treatment, prognosis, and survival of endometrial cancer. Based on these data, opportunities for improvements in the categorization and stratification of these factors were identified in each of the four stages. Data and analyses from the molecular and histological classifications performed and published in the recently developed ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines were used as a template for adding the new subclassifications to the proposed molecular and histological staging system.

RESULTS

Based on the existing evidence, the substages were defined as follows: Stage I (IA1): non-aggressive histological type of endometrial carcinoma limited to a polyp or confined to the endometrium; (IA2) non-aggressive histological types of endometrium involving less than 50% of the myometrium with no or focal lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) as defined by WHO criteria; (IA3) low-grade endometrioid carcinomas limited to the uterus with simultaneous low-grade endometrioid ovarian involvement; (IB) non-aggressive histological types involving 50% or more of the myometrium with no LVSI or focal LVSI; (IC) aggressive histological types, i.e. serous, high-grade endometrioid, clear cell, carcinosarcomas, undifferentiated, mixed, and other unusual types without any myometrial invasion. Stage II (IIA): non-aggressive histological types that infiltrate the cervical stroma; (IIB) non-aggressive histological types that have substantial LVSI; or (IIC) aggressive histological types with any myometrial invasion. Stage III (IIIA): differentiating between adnexal versus uterine serosa infiltration; (IIIB) infiltration of vagina/parametria and pelvic peritoneal metastasis; and (IIIC) refinements for lymph node metastasis to pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes, including micrometastasis and macrometastasis. Stage IV (IVA): locally advanced disease infiltrating the bladder or rectal mucosa; (IVB) extrapelvic peritoneal metastasis; and (IVC) distant metastasis. The performance of complete molecular classification (POLEmut, MMRd, NSMP, p53abn) is encouraged in all endometrial cancers. If the molecular subtype is known, this is recorded in the FIGO stage by the addition of "m" for molecular classification, and a subscript indicating the specific molecular subtype. When molecular classification reveals p53abn or POLEmut status in Stages I and II, this results in upstaging or downstaging of the disease (IICmp53abn or IAmPOLEmut ).

SUMMARY

The updated 2023 staging of endometrial cancer includes the various histological types, tumor patterns, and molecular classification to better reflect the improved understanding of the complex nature of the several types of endometrial carcinoma and their underlying biologic behavior. The changes incorporated in the 2023 staging system should provide a more evidence-based context for treatment recommendations and for the more refined future collection of outcome and survival data.

Sexual dysfunction among gynecologic cancer survivors in a population-based cohort study

Treatment for gynecologic cancer is associated with sexual dysfunction, which may present during and/or after treatment. The aim of this study was to investigate the risk of sexual dysfunction among gynecologic cancer survivors compared to cancer-free women in a population-based cohort study. We identified a cohort of 4863 endometrial, ovarian, and cervical cancer survivors diagnosed between 1997 and 2012 in the Utah Cancer Registry. Up to five cancer-free women were matched to cancer survivors (N = 22,693). We used ICD-9 codes to identify sexual dysfunction. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for sexual dysfunction with adjustment for potential confounders. Approximately 6.6% of gynecologic cancer survivors had sexual dysfunction diagnoses 1-5 years after cancer diagnosis. Gynecologic cancer survivors had higher risks of overall sexual dysfunction (HR: 2.51, 95% CI: 2.16, 2.93), dyspareunia (HR: 3.27, 95% CI: 2.63, 4.06), and vaginal dryness (HR: 2.63, 95% CI: 2.21, 3.12) compared to a general population of women, 1-5 years after cancer diagnosis. Sexual dysfunction was associated with advance cancer stage (HRRegional vs. Localized: 1.61, 95% CI: 1.19, 2.31), radiation therapy (HR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.29, 2.31), and chemotherapy (HR: 1.80, 95% CI: 1.30, 2.50). This large cohort study confirms that there is an increased risk of sexual dysfunction among gynecologic cancer survivors when compared to the general population. Further investigation is needed to address the risk factors for sexual dysfunction and to improve patient-provider communication, diagnosis, documentation, and treatment of sexual dysfunction among gynecologic cancer survivors.

Executive summary of the American Radium Society appropriate use criteria for management of uterine clear cell and serous carcinomas

BACKGROUND

Uterine clear cell and serous carcinomas have a high propensity for locoregional and distant spread, tend to be more advanced at presentation, and carry a higher risk of recurrence and death than endometrioid cancers. Limited prospective data exist to guide evidence-based management of these rare malignancies.

OBJECTIVE

The American Radium Society sought to summarize evidence-based guidelines developed by a multidisciplinary expert panel that help to guide the management of uterine clear cell and serous carcinomas.

METHODS

The American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria presented in this manuscript were developed by a multidisciplinary expert panel using an extensive analysis of current published literature from peer-reviewed journals. A well-established methodology (modified Delphi) was used to rate the appropriate use of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for the management of uterine clear cell and serous carcinomas.

RESULTS

The primary treatment for non-metastatic uterine clear cell and serous carcinomas is complete surgical staging, with total hysterectomy, salpingo-oophorectomy, omentectomy, and lymph node staging. Even in early-stage disease, patients with uterine clear cell and serous carcinomas have a worse prognosis than those with type I endometrial cancers, warranting consideration for adjuvant therapy regardless of the stage. Given the aggressive nature of these malignancies, and until further research determines the most appropriate adjuvant therapy, it may be reasonable to counsel patients about combined-modality treatment with systemic chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Patients diagnosed with uterine clear cell and serous carcinomas should undergo complete surgical staging. Multimodal adjuvant therapies should be considered in the treatment of both early-stage and advanced-stage disease. Further prospective studies or multi-institutional retrospective studies are warranted to determine optimal sequencing of therapy and appropriate management of patients based on their unique risk factors. Long-term surveillance is indicated due to the high risk of locoregional and distant recurrence.

Executive summary of the American Radium Society appropriate use criteria for management of uterine clear cell and serous carcinomas

BACKGROUND

Uterine clear cell and serous carcinomas have a high propensity for locoregional and distant spread, tend to be more advanced at presentation, and carry a higher risk of recurrence and death than endometrioid cancers. Limited prospective data exist to guide evidence-based management of these rare malignancies.

OBJECTIVE

The American Radium Society sought to summarize evidence-based guidelines developed by a multidisciplinary expert panel that help to guide the management of uterine clear cell and serous carcinomas.

METHODS

The American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria presented in this manuscript were developed by a multidisciplinary expert panel using an extensive analysis of current published literature from peer-reviewed journals. A well-established methodology (modified Delphi) was used to rate the appropriate use of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for the management of uterine clear cell and serous carcinomas.

RESULTS

The primary treatment for non-metastatic uterine clear cell and serous carcinomas is complete surgical staging, with total hysterectomy, salpingo-oophorectomy, omentectomy, and lymph node staging. Even in early-stage disease, patients with uterine clear cell and serous carcinomas have a worse prognosis than those with type I endometrial cancers, warranting consideration for adjuvant therapy regardless of the stage. Given the aggressive nature of these malignancies, and until further research determines the most appropriate adjuvant therapy, it may be reasonable to counsel patients about combined-modality treatment with systemic chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Patients diagnosed with uterine clear cell and serous carcinomas should undergo complete surgical staging. Multimodal adjuvant therapies should be considered in the treatment of both early-stage and advanced-stage disease. Further prospective studies or multi-institutional retrospective studies are warranted to determine optimal sequencing of therapy and appropriate management of patients based on their unique risk factors. Long-term surveillance is indicated due to the high risk of locoregional and distant recurrence.

Mental health disorders among ovarian cancer survivors in a population-based cohort

BACKGROUND

Ovarian cancer is the fifth most common female cancer in the United States. There have been very few studies investigating mental health diagnoses among ovarian cancer survivors with long-term follow up. The aim of this study is to examine the incidence of mental illness among ovarian cancer survivors compared to a general population cohort. A secondary aim is to investigate risk factors for mental illnesses among ovarian cancer survivors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Cohorts of 1689 ovarian cancer patients diagnosed between 1996 and 2012 and 7038 women without cancer matched by age and birth state from the general population were identified. Mental health diagnoses were identified from electronic medical records and statewide healthcare facilities data. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs).

RESULTS

Ovarian cancer survivors experienced increased risks of mental illnesses within the first 2 years after cancer diagnosis (HR = 3.55, 95% CI = 3.04-4.14). The risks of depression among ovarian cancer survivors were nearly 3-fold within the first 2 years of cancer diagnosis (HR = 2.59, 95% CI = 1.94-3.47), and 1.69-fold at 2-5 years after cancer diagnosis (HR = 1.69, 95% CI = 1.18-2.42). Ovarian cancer survivors experienced an 80% increased risk of death with a mental illness diagnosis (HR = 1.80, 95% CI = 1.48-2.18) and a 94% increased risk of death with a depression diagnosis (HR = 1.94, 95% CI = 1.56-2.40).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher risks of mental illnesses were observed among ovarian cancer survivors throughout the follow-up periods of 0-2 years and 2-5 years after cancer diagnosis. Multidisciplinary care is needed to monitor and treat mental illnesses among ovarian cancer survivors.

Brachytherapy: common pitfalls

Gynecologic radiation oncology is a demanding area of oncology requiring expertise in external beam and brachytherapy. Both physicians and physicists are called on to use their full complement of skills to employ state-of-the-art treatments to benefit patients. A wide variety of unusual presentations are frequent in gynecology, and hence, it is necessary to have a number of techniques available to offer the optimal treatments. The heterogeneity of treatments and the rarity of certain gynecological presentations lead to complexity and potential error. We reviewed previous gynecological high dose rate brachytherapy treatment images and plans for patients from the past decade and identified examples of common problems to share with the community. The strategies to prevent or recover from these pitfalls are also presented. With increasing number of applicator choices, it is critical for clinics to follow rigorous commissioning steps to ensure treatment process safety as described. The clinics should consider implementing a thorough on-boarding program and regular hands-on practice as a continuous quality improvement measure. The use of checklists can be invaluable and result in fewer human errors. Gynecological chart rounds that focus on brachytherapy are also encouraged. Lastly, an incident learning system to document small deviations that occur in the process, and a rigorous root cause analysis process could help prevent potential future incidents.

Vaginal cuff brachytherapy for endometrial cancer: a review of major clinical trials with a focus on fractionation

The use of vaginal cuff brachytherapy in the adjuvant management of endometrial cancer has increased over time. Recommendations from the American Brachytherapy Society, American Society of Radiation Oncology, and European Society for Medical Oncology help to guide the application of vaginal cuff brachytherapy. However, wide variation in practice remains regarding treatment techniques. This article reviews the use of vaginal cuff brachytherapy in the post-operative management of endometrial cancer. It covers risk stratification, treatment rationale, outcomes, and treatment planning recommendations with a specific focus on dose-fractionation regimens. The authors performed a thorough literature review of articles pertinent to the goals of this review. Also presented are early results of the Short Course Adjuvant Vaginal Cuff Brachytherapy in Early Endometrial Cancer Compared with Standard of Care (SAVE) trial of a two-fraction vaginal cuff brachytherapy regimen.

Adjuvant vaginal cuff brachytherapy for early-stage endometrial cancer results in excellent disease control with minimal toxicity. The PORTEC-2 trial showed that vaginal cuff brachytherapy is non-inferior to external beam radiation for vaginal recurrence in patients at high-intermediate risk. Vaginal cuff brachytherapy may also be used as a boost following external beam radiation in combination with chemotherapy for high-risk histologies. Numerous techniques can be used for vaginal cuff brachytherapy, including various medical devices, dose-fractionation schedules, and treatment planning approaches. The early control results of the SAVE trial are promising and we are hopeful that this trial establishes two fraction regimens as a viable option for vaginal cuff brachytherapy.

Refusal of surgery and survival outcomes in endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to determine the impact refusal of surgery has on overall survival in patients with endometrial cancer.

METHODS

From January 2004 to December 2015, the National Cancer Database was queried for patients with pathologically proven endometrial cancer who were recommended surgery and refused. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to account for differences in baseline characteristics between patients who underwent surgery and those who refused. Kaplan-Meier analyses and doubly robust estimation with multivariate Cox proportional hazards modeling were used to analyze overall survival.

RESULTS

Of the 300 675 patients identified, 534 patients (0.2%) were recommended surgical treatment but refused: 18% (95/534) were age ≤40 years. The 5-year overall survival for all patients who refused surgery was significantly decreased compared with patients who underwent surgery (29.2% vs 71.9%, P<0.01). This was demonstrated at ages 41-64 years (65.5% vs 91.0%, P<0.01) and ≥65 years (23.4% vs 75.3%, P<0.01). The 5-year overall survival did not meet statistical significance at age ≤40 years (90.1% vs 87.8% P<0.19). However, there were few patients in this cohort. On multivariate analysis, factors associated with refusal of surgery included: Medicaid insurance, Black race, Hispanic Race, Charlson Comorbidity Index scores of 2 or greater, stage II or III, and if patient received external beam radiation therapy alone. Factors associated with undergoing surgery included: age greater than 41, stage IB, and if the patient received brachytherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Refusal of surgery for endometrial cancer is uncommon and leads to decreased overall survival.

Abstract 900: Mental health disorders among ovarian cancer survivors in a population-based cohort

Ovarian cancer is the fifth most common female cancer in the United States. Although there have been many studies on self-reported QOL among ovarian cancer patients, there have been very few studies investigating mental disease diagnoses among ovarian cancer survivors with long term follow up. The aim of this study is to examine the incidence of mental illness among ovarian cancer survivors compared to a general population cohort. A secondary aim is to investigate risk factors for mental illnesses among ovarian cancer survivors. Cohorts of 1,689 ovarian cancer patients diagnosed between 1996 and 2012 and 7,038 women without cancer matched by age, birth state and follow up time from the general population were identified. Mental health diagnoses were identified from electronic medical records and statewide healthcare facilities data. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs). Ovarian cancer survivors experienced increased risks of mental illnesses within the first two years after cancer diagnosis (HR=3.48, 95%CI=2.98-4.05) compared to the general population. The risks of depression among ovarian cancer survivors were 3-fold within the first two years of cancer diagnosis (HR=3.11, 95%CI=2.53-3.83), and 1.67-fold at 2-5 years after cancer diagnosis (HR=1.67, 95%CI=1.17-2.38). The risk of anxiety disorder among ovarian cancer survivors was 3.54-fold at 0-2 years (HR= 3.54, 95% CI= 2.87-4.38), and 1.86-fold at 2-5 years (HR= 1.86, 95% CI= 1.14-3.01). Elevated risk for adjustment disorders was observed among ovarian cancer survivors compared with the general population cohort between 0-2 years (HR= 3.96, 95% CI= 1.00-15.84) and between 2-5 years (HR= 3.96, 95% CI= 1.00-15.84). Cancer treatment and later diagnosis year were associated with increased risk of any mental illness at 0-2 years after cancer diagnosis among ovarian cancer survivors. Distant-stage cancer was an important risk factor compared to early-stage for both mental illness and depression among ovarian cancer survivors in all time periods. Ovarian cancer patients who had a mucinous histology subtype had 47% decreased risk of any mental illness and 67% decreased risk of depression at 0-2 years, compare to those with high-grade serous histology subtype. In addition, a baseline CCI score of 1+ and older age at diagnosis (&gt;60 years old) were important for the increased risk of depression at 0-2 years or &gt;5 year after cancer diagnosis, respectively. Ovarian cancer survivors experienced an 80% increased risk of death with a mental illness diagnosis (HR=1.80, 95% CI=1.48-2.18) and a 94% increased risk of death with a depression diagnosis (HR=1.94, 95% CI=1.56-2.40).Higher risks of mental illnesses were observed among ovarian cancer survivors throughout the follow-up periods of 0-2 years and 2-5 years after cancer diagnosis. Multidisciplinary care is needed to monitor and treat mental illnesses among ovarian cancer survivors.

Citation Format: Siqi Hu, David Baraghoshi, Esther Chang, Kerry Rowe, John Snyder, Vikrant Deshmukh, Michael Newman, Alison Fraser, David Gaffney, Ken Smith, Kimberly Herget, Anita Peoples, Mia Hashibe. Mental health disorders among ovarian cancer survivors in a population-based cohort [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 900.

Abstract 899: Sexual dysfunction among gynecologic cancer survivors in a population-based cohort study

Background: Treatment for gynecologic cancer is associated with side effects including sexual dysfunction, that present during and after treatment, and can be long lasting. The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency and the risk of sexual dysfunction among gynecologic cancer survivors compared to cancer-free women in a population-based cohort study.

Methods: We identified a cohort of 4,889 endometrial, ovarian and cervical cancer survivors diagnosed between 1997-2012 in the Utah Cancer Registry. Up to five cancer-free women were matched to cancer survivors on birth year and birth state from the Utah Population Database (N=22,809). We used ICD-9 codes to identify sexual dysfunction including dyspareunia, vaginal dryness/atrophic vaginitis, decreased libido, and lack of arousal/orgasm. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for sexual dysfunction with adjustment for potential confounders, including race/ethnicity, baseline body mass index (BMI), and baseline Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI).

Results: Gynecologic cancer survivors had higher risks of sexual dysfunction (HR: 2.52, 95% CI: 2.16, 2.93) compared to a general population of women 1-5 years after cancer diagnosis. Sexual dysfunction was associated with advance cancer stage (HRRegional vs. Localized: 1.59, 95% CI:1.19, 2.12), radiation therapy (HR: 1.65, 95% CI: 1.26, 2.16), and chemotherapy (HR: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.17, 2.01).

Conclusions: Although this large cohort study confirms an increased risk of sexual dysfunction among gynecologic cancer survivors, the proportion of cases documented with diagnosis codes was lower than those commonly reported by gynecologic cancer survivors (6% vs. 10-85%). Further investigation into this discrepancy is important in improving survivorship issues for gynecological cancer patients.

Sexual dysfunction among gynecologic cancer survivors and women from the general population**Gynecologic cancer survivorsOvarian cancer survivorsEndometrial cancer survivorsCervical cancer survivorsHR (95% CI)bHR (95% CI)bHR (95% CI)bHR (95% CI)bSexual dysfunctiona2.52 (2.16, 2.93)*2.76 (2.02, 3.76)*2.35 (1.88, 2.92)2.62 (1.83, 3.74)*Dyspareunia3.25 (2.62, 4.04)*3.20 (2.10, 4.88)*3.03 (2.16, 4.24)3.24 (2.04, 5.14)*Vaginal Dryness/Atrophic Vaginitis2.62 (2.21, 3.11)*3.43 (2.26, 5.22)2.49 (2.00, 3.09)*2.90 (1.77, 4.76)Abbreviation: HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval. a. Sexual dysfunction included dyspareunia, vaginal dryness/atrophic vaginitis, decreased libido, lack of arousal/orgasm. b. Models adjusted for matching factors (birth year and birth state), race/ethnicity, baseline body mass index, baseline Charlson Comorbidity Index.*Proportional hazards assumption not met; flexible model was used.**1 to 5 years after cancer diagnosis

Citation Format: Chun-Pin Chang, Christina M. Wilson, Kerry Rowe, John Snyder, Mark Dodson, Vikrant Deshmukh, Michael Newman, Alison Fraser, Ken Smith, Ankita Date, Joseph B. Stanford, David Gaffney, Kathi Mooney, Mia Hashibe. Sexual dysfunction among gynecologic cancer survivors in a population-based cohort study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 899.

The Cervical Cancer Research Network (Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup) roadmap to expand research in low- and middle-income countries

Cervical cancer is a global health problem which disproportionally affects women in low- and middle- income countries. The World Health Organization recently launched its global strategy to eliminate this disease in the next two decades. For those women diagnosed today with cervical cancer better strategies are needed to improve outcome and reduce treatment-related morbidity. Clinical trials are critical to shaping future treatment, and much has been achieved already. However, such opportunities are limited in low resource settings, and the Cervical Cancer Research Network is dedicated to expanding access to new technologies in surgery, radiation, and medical oncology. In this article we review the status of the trials portfolio and outline future objectives, including the launch of a number of research grants for aspiring or established researchers in low- and middle-income settings.

Disparities in Cardiovascular Disease Risk Among Hispanic Breast Cancer Survivors in a Population-Based Cohort

Background

Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer death among Hispanic women. The aim of our study was to estimate cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk among Hispanic and non-Hispanic White (NHW) breast cancer survivors compared with their respective general population cohorts.

Methods

Cohorts of 17 469 breast cancer survivors (1774 Hispanic and 15 695 NHW) in the Utah Cancer Registry diagnosed between 1997 and 2016, and 65 866 women (6209 Hispanic and 59 657 NHW) from the general population in the Utah Population Database were identified. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for CVD.

Results

The risk of diseases of the circulatory system was higher in Hispanic than NHW breast cancer survivors 1-5 years after cancer diagnosis, in comparison with their respective general population cohorts (HR_Hispanic = 1.94, 99% confidence interval [CI] = 1.49 to 2.53; H_NHW = 1.38, 99% CI = 1.33 to 1.43; 2-sided P_{heterogeneity} = .01, respectively). Increased risks were observed for both Hispanic and NHW breast cancer survivors for diseases of the heart and the veins and lymphatics, compared with the general population cohorts. More than 5 years after cancer diagnosis, elevated risk of diseases of the veins and lymphatics persisted in both ethnicities. The CVD risk due to chemotherapy and hormone therapy was higher in Hispanic than NHW breast cancer survivors but did not differ for distant stage, higher baseline comorbidities, or baseline smoking.

Conclusions

We observed a risk difference for diseases of the circulatory system between Hispanic and NHW breast cancer survivors compared with their respective general population cohorts but only within the first 5 years of cancer diagnosis.

Status of the Clinician Investigator in America: An Essential Healthcare Provider Driving Advances in Cancer Care

BACKGROUND

Translation of basic discoveries to clinical care for patients with cancer is a difficult process greatly enabled by physician-trained researchers. Three categories of physicians, with responsibilities spanning from laboratory and preclinical research to direct patient care, are involved in the translational research continuum: physician-scientist (PS), clinician investigator (CI), and academic clinician (AC).

METHODS

To define how protected time for research efforts is supported, the Association of American Cancer Institutes (AACI) conducted a survey of their member institutions, obtaining 56 responses documenting time spent in research and clinical activities across multiple cancer disciplines, and providing information about funding streams for the different categories of cancer physicians.

RESULTS

Responses showed that PSs and ACs are minimally involved in clinical research activities; the driver or clinical research in academic cancer centers is the CI. A significant concern was a lack of stable funding streams for nonbillable clinical research activities, putting the sustainability of the CI in jeopardy. Limited funding was derived from hospital sources, with most support derived from cancer center sources.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the importance of the CI in translational cancer medicine and represents a call to action for institutions and research funding agencies to develop new programs targeted toward CI support to ensure continued progress against cancer.

Cervical cancer in Eastern Europe: review and proceedings from the Cervical Cancer Research Conference

Cervical cancer is the third most common cancer among women worldwide, with a disproportionately high burden of disease in less-developed regions of the world. The Cervix Cancer Research Network was founded by the Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup with a mission to improve outcomes in cervical cancer by enhancing international access to clinical trials, specifically in under-represented, underdeveloped areas. The Cervix Cancer Research Network held its third international educational symposium in Bucharest in 2018 and is the subject of this report. The purpose of this symposium was to advance the international understanding of cervical cancer treatment patterns, to foster recruitment to Cervix Cancer Research Network clinical trials, and identify key Cervix Cancer Research Network clinical trial concepts to improve cervical cancer care worldwide.

Abstract 5795: Long-term diabetes risk among ovarian cancer survivors in a population-based cohort study

Objective. In the United States, ovarian cancer is the eleventh most common female cancer and the fifth most common cause of cancer death among women. Although incidence and death rates have been declining over the last 10 years, the 5-year survival rate is 47.6%. Diabetes was the seventh leading cause of death in the United States and is associated with an increased mortality rate among cancer patients. While previous studies have examined the association between diabetes and the risk of ovarian cancer, there are very few studies investigating the risk of diabetes after an ovarian cancer diagnosis. We previously reported increased risks of type I and II diabetes among endometrial cancer survivors, but there is no previous study, to our knowledge, that examined the risk of diabetes among ovarian cancer survivors. The aim of this study was to investigate long-term diabetes risk among ovarian cancer survivors compared with a general population of women.

Methods. Ovarian cancer patients diagnosed from 1996 to 2012 in the Utah Cancer Registry were matched to up to 5 cancer-free women on birth state and birth year using the Utah Population Database. Diabetes diagnoses were identified with ICD-9 codes from statewide ambulatory surgery records, statewide inpatient databases and electronic medical records. We estimated hazard ratios with Cox Proportional Hazards models to: (1) investigate risk for diabetes after cancer diagnosis among ovarian cancer survivors compared with the general population, and (2) examine risk factors for type II diabetes among ovarian cancer survivors.

Results. A total 1,520 ovarian cancer patients and 5,709 women from the general population were included in the final cohort. A slightly higher proportion of ovarian cancer patients were obese at baseline (16.3%) than the general population cohort (14.9%). Ovarian cancer survivors had a higher risk of type II diabetes in the first year after cancer diagnosis (HR=3.09, 95%CI=2.09, 4.56) and overall (HR=1.52, 95%CI=1.23, 1.88) compared with the general population. However, associations between ovarian cancer and type II diabetes were not observed in the later follow up periods. High BMI was a significant risk factor for type II diabetes among ovarian cancer survivors, with a dose-response relation (overweight; HR=1.81, 95%CI=1.21, 2.71, obese; HR=2.48, 95%CI=1.61, 3.83, P-trend &lt;0.001). Clinical factors such as cancer treatment, stage, and histology did not contribute to an increased risk of type II diabetes among ovarian cancer patients. Other factors such as race and baseline comorbidities were also not associated with type II diabetes risk among ovarian cancer patients.

Conclusion. Ovarian cancer survivors had an increased risk of type II diabetes compared with women in the general population. Risk was elevated only within the first year of cancer diagnosis, thus surveillance bias cannot be ruled out. Our findings suggest that the increased risk of type II diabetes does not persist beyond the first year after cancer diagnosis.

Citation Format: Seungmin Kim, Kerry Rowe, John Snyder, Alison Fraser, Ken Smith, Vikrant G. Deshmukh, Michael Newman, Kimberley Herget, Chun-Pin Chang, Dominik Ose, Mary C. Playdon, David Gaffney, Mia Hashibe. Long-term diabetes risk among ovarian cancer survivors in a population-based cohort study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 5795.

Abstract 5797: Genitourinary disease risks among ovarian cancer survivors in a population-based cohort study

Background. While genitourinary complications during treatment for ovarian cancer are well known, long-term adverse outcomes in the growing population of ovarian cancer survivors have yet to be characterized. The aim of our study is to describe the incidence of genitourinary diseases among ovarian cancer survivors after ovarian cancer diagnosis, compared to the general female population.

Methods. We identified a cohort of 1,270 ovarian cancer survivors diagnosed between 1996 and 2012 in the Utah Cancer Registry, and up to five cancer-free women were matched to ovarian cancer survivors on birth year and state from the Utah Population Database (N=5,286). Genitourinary disease diagnoses were identified with ICD-9 codes from electronic medical records and statewide healthcare facilities data. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compute hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for genitourinary outcomes at 1 to &lt;5 years after cancer diagnosis and 5+ years after cancer diagnosis with adjustment for potential confounders (e.g., race, baseline body mass index (BMI), and baseline Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI)).

Results. Urinary system disorders were diagnosed more frequently in ovarian cancer survivors compared to women without cancer (34.6% vs 19.3%, p-value &lt;0.001) in years 1-5 of follow up (HR: 2.53, 95% CI: 2.12-3.01). More than 5 years after cancer diagnosis, ovarian cancer survivors had a higher risk of hydronephrosis compared to the general population (HR: 9.10, 95% CI: 4.29-19.33). Genital organ disorders were also more common among ovarian cancer survivors (22.0%) compared to women in the general population (16.3%; HR: 1.89, 95% CI: 1.57-2.27). The risk of pelvic peritoneal adhesions was highest 1-5 years after cancer diagnosis (HR: 16.59, 95% CI: 7.00-39.34) and persisted 5+ years after cancer diagnosis (HR: 8.88, 95% CI: 1.88-41.91). A higher risk of urinary system disorders among ovarian cancer patients was associated with advanced cancer stage (HRadvanced vs. localized: 3.11, 95% CI: 2.18-4.45), older age at cancer diagnosis (HR80+ vs. 18-49: 2.85, 95% CI: 1.62-5.01), and higher baseline CCI score (HR2+ vs. 0: 2.71, 95% CI: 1.84-3.99). The associations remained when we restricted analyses to ovarian cancer survivors with high-grade serous ovarian cancer.

Conclusions. In this population-based cohort study, ovarian cancer survivors experienced increased risks of various genitourinary diseases for many years after cancer diagnosis. Understanding the multimorbidity trajectory for ovarian cancer survivors after cancer treatment is needed to ultimately improve clinical care after cancer diagnosis. The present results point to the importance of monitoring for genitourinary diseases among ovarian cancer survivors.

Citation Format: Chun-Pin Chang, Yuji Chen, Brenna Blackburn, Sarah Abdelaziz, Kerry Rowe, John Snyder, Mark Dodson, Vikrant Deshmukh, Michael Newman, Joseph B. Stanford, Christina A. Porucznik, Jennifer Ose, Alison Fraser, Ken Smith, Jennifer Doherty, David Gaffney, Mia Hashibe. Genitourinary disease risks among ovarian cancer survivors in a population-based cohort study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 5797.

American Brachytherapy Society working group report on the patterns of care and a literature review of reirradiation for gynecologic cancers

PURPOSE

Recurrences of previously irradiated gynecological malignancies are uncommon. Standardized management of these cases is not well established. We aim to provide an in-depth literature review and present current practice patterns among an international group of experienced practitioners in the reirradiation setting of gynecologic cancers.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

An extensive literature search was performed and 35 articles were selected based on preset criteria. A 20-question online survey of 10 experts regarding their retreatment practices was also conducted.

RESULTS

The reviewed publications include a diverse group of patients, multiple treatment techniques, a range of total doses, local control, overall survival, and toxicity outcomes. Overall, local control ranged from 44% to 88% over 1-5 years with OS in the range of 39.5-82% at 2-5 years. Late G3-4 toxicity varied very broadly from 0% to 42.9%, with most papers reporting serious toxicities greater than 15%. The most common reirradiation technique utilized was brachytherapy. Some low-dose-rate data suggest improved outcomes with doses >50 Gy. The high-dose-rate data are more varied with some studies suggesting improved local control with doses >40 Gy. In general, a longer time interval between the first and second course of radiation as well as recurrences <2-4 cm tend to have improved outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Reirradiation with brachytherapy results in relatively reasonable local control and toxicities for women with recurrent gynecologic cancers. The appropriate dose for each case needs to be individualized given the heterogeneity of cases. Multidisciplinary management is critical to develop individualized plans and to clearly communicate potential side effects and expected treatment outcomes.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Reirradiation with brachytherapy is an acceptable effective organ preserving approach for recurrent gynecologic cancers with a reasonable local control and toxicity profile. Each case requires multidisciplinary management to develop an individualized approach. Monitoring for potential long-term toxicities is essential.

Long-term diabetes risk among endometrial cancer survivors in a population-based cohort study

OBJECTIVE

The majority of endometrial cancer patients are overweight or obese at cancer diagnosis. Obesity is a shared risk factor for both endometrial cancer and diabetes, but it is unknown whether endometrial cancer patients have increased diabetes risks. The aim of our study was to investigate diabetes risk among endometrial cancer patients.

METHODS

Endometrial cancer patients diagnosed between 1997 and 2012 in Utah (n = 2,314) were identified. Women from the general population (n = 8,583) were matched to the cancer patients on birth year and birth state. Diabetes diagnoses were identified from electronic medical records and statewide healthcare facility databases. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios for diabetes after cancer diagnosis.

RESULTS

Endometrial cancer survivors had a significantly higher risk of type II diabetes when compared to women from the general population in the first year after cancer diagnosis (HR = 5.22, 95% CI = 4.05, 6.71), >1-5 years after cancer diagnosis (HR = 1.67, 95% CI = 1.31, 2.12), and >5 years after cancer diagnosis (HR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.29, 2.11). Endometrial cancer patients who were obese at cancer diagnosis had a three-fold increase in type II diabetes risk (HR = 2.99, 95%CI = 2.59, 3.45). Although endometrial cancer patients diagnosed at distant stage had a higher risk of diabetes, cancer treatment did not appear to contribute to any diabetes risks.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, endometrial cancer survivors had a higher risk of diabetes than women in the general population. These results suggest that long term monitoring for diabetes is indicated for endometrial cancer survivors.

Comparison of surface guidance and target matching for image-guided accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI)

PURPOSE

We investigate the feasibility of surface guided radiation therapy (SGRT) for accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) by comparing it with in-room, fan beam kV computed tomography on rails (CTOR) imaging of the targeted region. The uniqueness of our study is that all patients have multiple daily CTOR scans to compare corresponding SGRT AlignRT (VisionRT, United Kingdom) images to.

METHODS/MATERIALS

Twelve patients receiving APBI were enrolled in this study. Before each treatment fraction, after patients were setup on tattoos, SGRT was performed using AlignRT, and then target matching was performance using CTOR. The average and maximum difference in shifts between SGRT and CTOR were calculated and analyzed for each patient, so as the correlation between surgical cavity size and shift difference.

RESULTS

Our study showed that SGRT agreed well with CTOR for patients with small surgical cavity volume changes (<10%). There were nine patients who had a ≥5 mm maximum shift difference between SGRT and CTOR along any direction, and in two patients the difference was more than 10 mm (one patient with surgical cavity change 44.3% and one patient with 27 cc cavity volume decrease). All patients, except one, had a mean shift difference < 5 mm along any direction.

CONCLUSION

For the patients studied here, SGRT appears to be a reasonable and potentially valuable image guidance approach for APBI for patients who experience small changes in surgical cavity volume (<10%) between CT simulation and treatment. However, there is potential for larger alignment errors (up to 11 mm) when using SGRT for patients who experience larger surgical cavity changes.

Long-term Cardiovascular Outcomes Among Endometrial Cancer Survivors in a Large, Population-Based Cohort Study

Background

Endometrial cancer is the second most common cancer among female cancer survivors in the United States. Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death among endometrial cancer survivors. Studies that examine long-term cardiovascular outcomes among endometrial cancer survivors are critical.

Methods

Cohorts of 2648 endometrial cancer survivors diagnosed between 1997 and 2012 and 10 503 age-matched women from the general population were identified. Cardiovascular disease diagnoses were identified from electronic medical records and statewide ambulatory surgery and statewide inpatient data. Cox regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) at one to five years, more than five to 10 years, and more than 10 years after cancer diagnosis.

Results

Between one and five years after diagnosis, increased cardiovascular risks among endometrial cancer survivors were observed for phlebitis, thrombophlebitis, and thromboembolism (HR = 2.07, 99% confidence interval [CI] = 1.57 to 2.72), pulmonary heart disease (HR = 1.74, 99% CI = 1.26 to 2.40), and atrial fibrillation (HR = 1.50, 99% CI = 1.07 to 2.11). At more than five to 10 years, some elevated risk persisted for cardiovascular diseases. Compared with patients who had surgery, patients who additionally had radiation therapy and/or chemotherapy were at increased risk for heart and circulatory system disorders between one and five years after cancer diagnosis. Older age and obesity were also risk factors for hypertension and heart disease among endometrial cancer survivors.

Conclusions

Endometrial cancer survivors are at higher risk for various adverse long-term cardiovascular outcomes compared with women from the general population. This study suggests that increased monitoring for cardiovascular diseases may be necessary for endometrial cancer patients for 10 years after cancer diagnosis.

Hypoxia imaging in upper gastrointestinal tumors and application to radiation therapy

Survival for upper gastrointestinal tumors remains poor, likely in part due to treatment resistance associated with intratumoral hypoxia. In this review, we highlight advances in nuclear medicine imaging that allow for characterization of in vivo tumor hypoxia in esophageal, pancreatic, and liver cancers. Strategies for adaptive radiotherapy in upper gastrointestinal tumors are proposed that would apply information gained through hypoxia imaging to the creation of personalized radiotherapy treatment plans able to overcome hypoxia-induced treatment resistance, minimize treatment-related toxicities, and improve patient outcomes.

Long-term Cardiovascular Outcomes Among Endometrial Cancer Survivors in a Large, Population-Based Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Endometrial cancer is the second most common cancer among female cancer survivors in the United States. Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death among endometrial cancer survivors. Studies that examine long-term cardiovascular outcomes among endometrial cancer survivors are critical.

METHODS

Cohorts of 2648 endometrial cancer survivors diagnosed between 1997 and 2012 and 10 503 age-matched women from the general population were identified. Cardiovascular disease diagnoses were identified from electronic medical records and statewide ambulatory surgery and statewide inpatient data. Cox regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) at one to five years, more than five to 10 years, and more than 10 years after cancer diagnosis.

RESULTS

Between one and five years after diagnosis, increased cardiovascular risks among endometrial cancer survivors were observed for phlebitis, thrombophlebitis, and thromboembolism (HR = 2.07, 99% confidence interval [CI] = 1.57 to 2.72), pulmonary heart disease (HR = 1.74, 99% CI = 1.26 to 2.40), and atrial fibrillation (HR = 1.50, 99% CI = 1.07 to 2.11). At more than five to 10 years, some elevated risk persisted for cardiovascular diseases. Compared with patients who had surgery, patients who additionally had radiation therapy and/or chemotherapy were at increased risk for heart and circulatory system disorders between one and five years after cancer diagnosis. Older age and obesity were also risk factors for hypertension and heart disease among endometrial cancer survivors.

CONCLUSIONS

Endometrial cancer survivors are at higher risk for various adverse long-term cardiovascular outcomes compared with women from the general population. This study suggests that increased monitoring for cardiovascular diseases may be necessary for endometrial cancer patients for 10 years after cancer diagnosis.

2017 American Brachytherapy Society’s Annual Meeting Report

The American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) and its membership seeks to benefit patients by promoting the highest possible standard for brachytherapy practice, support health care professionals through the encouragement of state of the art technology and education, promote clinical and laboratory research, and advocate for the socioeconomic aspects of brachytherapy. The 2017 ABS Annual Meeting took place is Boston, Massachusetts, United States from April 20–22, 2017. The theme “The Value of Brachytherapy in Multidisciplinary Cancer Care” drew a multitude of national and international speakers to present data and debate clinical indications, advancements in practice and the value of brachytherapy. With a focus on the advancement of brachytherapy for prostate cancer and the socioeconomic benefits of brachytherapy, the globally focused program hosted 93 speakers, 506 attendees, and exhibitors from 15 countries and featured 251 abstracts for presentation and display. The ABS Annual Meeting left attendees with initial data on timely and relevant topics such as outcomes following brachytherapy for recurrent prostate cancer following external beam radiotherapy, findings of prototype algorithms capable of rapidly generating prostate brachytherapy pre-operative treatment plans and results on the socioeconomic disparities impacting the utilization of brachytherapy for common malignancies. These novel findings, among many other thoughtful and thought-provoking presentations, gave meeting attendees knowledge of the current state of brachytherapy and future directions of the specialty.

American Brachytherapy Society recurrent carcinoma of the endometrium task force patterns of care and review of the literature

PURPOSE

The purpose of this American Brachytherapy Society task force is to present a literature review and patterns of care by a panel of experts for the management of vaginal recurrence of endometrial cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In 2016, the American Brachytherapy Society Board selected a panel of experts in gynecologic brachytherapy to update our current state of knowledge for managing vaginal recurrence of endometrial cancer. Practice patterns were evaluated via an online survey and clinical updates occurred through a combination of literature review and clinical experience and/or expertise.

RESULTS

There are various retrospective series of patients treated with radiation for vaginal recurrence of endometrial cancer, which include a varied group of patients, multiple treatment techniques, and a range of total doses and demonstrate a wide scope of local control and overall survival outcomes. In the era of image-guided brachytherapy, high local control rates with low significant late-term morbidities can be achieved. Lower rates of local control and higher late-term toxicity are reported in the retreatment setting. In patients with no previous history of radiation treatment, external beam radiation therapy followed by brachytherapy boost should be used. There are varying practices with regard to the definition and appropriate doses of both the high-risk clinical target volume and the intermediate-risk clinical target volume in the setting of vaginal recurrence of endometrial cancer. There are limited data to provide appropriate dose constraints for some organs at risk with the majority of guidance taken from the definitive cervical cancer literature.

CONCLUSIONS

A summary of literature and expert practice patterns for patient selection, dose recommendations, and constraints are provided as guidance for practitioners.

Fifth Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conference of the Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup: recurrent disease

This manuscript reports the consensus statements regarding recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC), reached at the fifth Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conference (OCCC), which was held in Tokyo, Japan, in November 2015. Three important questions were identified: (i) What are the subgroups for clinical trials in ROC? The historical definition of using platinum-free interval (PFI) to categorise patients as having platinum-sensitive/resistant disease was replaced by therapy-free interval (TFI). TFI can be broken down into TFIp (PFI), TFInp (non-PFI) and TFIb (biological agent-free interval). Additional criteria to consider include histology, BRCA mutation status, number/type of previous therapies, outcome of prior surgery and patient reported symptoms. (ii) What are the control arms for clinical trials in ROC? When platinum is considered the best option, the control arm should be a platinum-based therapy with or without an anti-angiogenic agent or a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor. If platinum is not considered the best option, the control arm could include a non-platinum drug, either as single agent or in combination. (iii) What are the endpoints for clinical trials in ROC? Overall survival (OS) is the preferred endpoint for patient cohorts with an expected median OS < or = 12 months. Progression-free survival (PFS) is an alternative, and it is the preferred endpoint when the expected median OS is > 12 months. However, PFS alone should not be the only endpoint and must be supported by additional endpoints including pre-defined patient reported outcomes (PROs), time to second subsequent therapy (TSST), or time until definitive deterioration of quality of life (TUDD).

Clinical trials in low and middle-income countries - Successes and challenges

Gynecologic malignancies affect women in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) at equal or higher rates compared to high income countries (HICs), yet practice guidelines based on clinical trials performed in HICs do not routinely account for resource disparities between these regions. There is a need and growing interest for executing clinical trials in LMICs. This has led to the creation of multinational cooperative groups and the initiation of several ongoing clinical trials in Mexico, China, and Korea. In this article we describe the challenges involved in initiating clinical trials in LMICs, review current efforts within surgical, medical, and radiation oncology, and introduce high priority topics for future research.

American Brachytherapy Society: Brachytherapy treatment recommendations for locally advanced cervix cancer for low-income and middle-income countries

PURPOSE

Most cervix cancer cases occur in low-income and middle-income countries (LMIC), and outcomes are suboptimal, even for early stage disease. Brachytherapy plays a central role in the treatment paradigm, improving both local control and overall survival. The American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) aims to provide guidelines for brachytherapy delivery in resource-limited settings.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A panel of clinicians and physicists with expertise in brachytherapy administration in LMIC was convened. A survey was developed to identify practice patterns at the authors' institutions and was also extended to participants of the Cervix Cancer Research Network. The scientific literature was reviewed to identify consensus papers or review articles with a focus on treatment of locally advanced, unresected cervical cancer in LMIC.

RESULTS

Of the 40 participants invited to respond to the survey, 32 responded (response rate 80%). Participants were practicing in 14 different countries including both high-income (China, Singapore, Taiwan, United Kingdom, and United States) and low-income or middle-income countries (Bangladesh, Botswana, Brazil, India, Malaysia, Pakistan, Philippines, Thailand, and Vietnam). Recommendations for modifications to existing ABS guidelines were reviewed by the panel members and are highlighted in this article.

CONCLUSIONS

Recommendations for treatment of locally advanced, unresectable cervical cancer in LMIC are presented. The guidelines comment on staging, external beam radiotherapy, use of concurrent chemotherapy, overall treatment duration, use of anesthesia, applicator choice and placement verification, brachytherapy treatment planning including dose and prescription point, recommended reporting and documentation, physics support, and follow-up.

Impact on survival with adjuvant radiotherapy for clear cell, mucinous, and endometriod ovarian cancer: the SEER experience from 2004 to 2011

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the impact of radiotherapy on cause specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) for stage (I-III) clear cell, mucinous, and endometriod ovarian cancer.

METHODS

We analyzed incidence, survival, and treatments from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program from 2004 to 2011 for clear cell, mucinous, and endometriod histologies of the ovary for stages (I-III). We examined CSS and OS for all three histologies combined and each histology with relation to the use of adjuvant radiation therapy (RT). Survival analysis was calculated by Kaplan-Meier and log-rank analysis.

RESULTS

CSS was higher in individuals not receiving RT at 5 years (81% vs. 74%) and 10 years (74% vs. 65%, p=0.003). OS was higher in individuals not receiving RT at 5 years (76% vs. 73%) and 10 years (64% vs. 59%, p=0.039). Stage III patients receiving RT had a higher OS at 5 years (54% vs. 44%) and 10 year intervals (36% vs. 30%, p=0.037). Stage III patients with mucinous histology receiving RT had a higher OS at 5 years (50% vs. 36%) and 10 years (45% vs. 26%, p=0.052).

CONCLUSION

Those receiving RT had a lower CSS and OS at 5 and 10 years. However, subgroup analysis revealed a benefit of RT in terms of OS for all stage III patients and for stage III patients with mucinous histology.

Consensus statement for brachytherapy for the treatment of medically inoperable endometrial cancer

PURPOSE

The purpose of this consensus statement from the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) is to summarize recent advances and to generate general guidelines for the management of medically inoperable endometrial cancer patients with radiation therapy.

METHODS

Recent advances in the literature were summarized and reviewed by a panel of experts. Panel members participated in a series of conference calls and were surveyed to determine their current practices and patterns. This document was reviewed and approved by the full panel, the ABS Board of Directors and the ACR Commission on Radiation Oncology.

RESULTS

A transition from two-dimensional (2D) to three-dimensional (3D) treatment planning for the definitive treatment of medically inoperable endometrial cancer is described. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging can be used to define the gross tumor volume (GTV), clinical target volume (CTV), and the organs at risk (OARs). Brachytherapy alone can be used for medically inoperable endometrial cancer patients with clinical Stage I cancer with no lymph node involvement and no evidence of deep invasion of the myometrium on MR imaging. In the absence of MR imaging, a combined approach using external beam and brachytherapy may be considered.

CONCLUSIONS

Recent advances support the use of MR imaging and 3D planning for brachytherapy treatment for medically inoperable endometrial cancer.