Single-Masked Randomized Phase 2 Study Assessing 2 Forms of Hypofractionated Proton Therapy in Patients With Large Choroidal Melanomas

PURPOSE

Patients with large uveal melanomas are at major risk of liver metastases. Some patients are reluctant to undergo the standard treatment (ie, immediate enucleation). Proton therapy yields 5-year local control rates and eyeball retention of >85% and ≈20% in large uveal melanomas. Patients with T3/T4 uveal melanomas refusing enucleation were randomized between standard 4 to 13 Gy-fraction or moderately hypofractionated 8 to 6.5 Gy-fraction proton therapy. The main endpoint was the 2-year local recurrence-free survival without enucleation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A single-masked 1:2 randomized phase 2 trial was conducted between 2015 and 2017 with planned endoresection and distance to the posterior pole as strata. Local events were defined as local relapse, or enucleation due to complications or relapse.

RESULTS

The 32 patients, with a mean age of 64 years, had T3/4 (N = 17/15), M1 (N = 2) uveal melanomas, of mean tumor diameter and thickness of 16.5 mm and 9.1 mm, and of posterior location in 56.5%. Median follow-up was 56.7 months. The 2-year local recurrence-free survival rate without enucleation was 79% (95% confidence interval, 65%-96%), similar in both arms. There were 9 enucleations, 3 at relapse and 6 for toxicities. Twelve patients had distant metastases. The 2-year-overall survival was 72% (95% confidence interval, 58%-89%). At baseline, visual acuity by average logarithm value of the minimum angle of resolution was 0.68 and 0.70 in the standard and experimental arms, and at last follow-up 2 and 1.7, with mean differences of 1.44 and 1.01, respectively (P = .39).

CONCLUSION

An 8-times 6.5 Gy scheme is feasible without deteriorating local control and with similar toxicity rates in patients with large uveal melanomas. Larger studies incorporating adjuvant treatments are warranted.

30 years of ocular proton therapy, the Nice view

PURPOSE

Radiotherapy with protons (PT) is a standard treatment of ocular tumors. It achieves excellent tumor control, limited toxicities, and the preservation of important functional outcomes, such as vision. Although PT may appear as one homogenous technique, it can be performed using dedicated ocular passive scattering PT or, increasingly, Pencil Beam Scanning (PBS), both with various degrees of patient-oriented customization.

MATERAIAL AND METHODS

MEDICYC PT facility of Nice are detailed with respect to their technical, dosimetric, microdosimetric and radiobiological, patient and tumor-customization process of PT planning and delivery that are key. 6684 patients have been treated for ocular tumors (1991-2020). Machine characteristics (accelerator, beam line, beam monitoring) allow efficient proton extraction, high dose rate, sharp lateral and distal penumbrae, and limited stray radiation in comparison to beam energy reduction and subsequent straggling with high-energy PBS PT. Patient preparation before PT includes customized setup and image-guidance, CT-based planning, and ocular PT software modelling of the patient eye with integration of beam modifiers. Clinical reports have shown excellent tumor control rates (∼95%), vision preservation and limited toxicity rates (papillopathy, retinopathy, neovascular glaucoma, dry eye, madarosis, cataract).

RESULTS

Although demanding, dedicated ocular PT has proven its efficiency in achieving excellent tumor control, OAR sparing and patient radioprotection. It is therefore worth adaptations of the equipments and practice.

CONCLUSIONS

Some of these adaptations can be transferred to other PT centers and should be acknowledeged when using non-PT options.

Role of proton therapy in reirradiation and in the treatment of sarcomas

Reirradiation and irradiation of sarcoma is often difficult due to the frequent need for a high dose of radiation in order to increase tumor control. This can result in a greater risk of toxicity which can be mitigated with the use of proton therapy. The present review aims to summarize the role of proton therapy in these 2 clinical contexts.

Head and neck proton therapy in France: A missed opportunity or a challenge in front of us?

Following major advances of the best of photon-techniques such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and, to arrive soon, magnetic resonance (MR)-linac radiotherapy, there are still substantial opportunities in the treatment of head and neck cancers to further reduce the toxicity burden. Proton therapy represents another attractive option in this high-quality and highly competitive precision radiotherapy landscape. Proton therapy holds promises to reduce toxicities and to escalate the dose in radioresistant cases or cases where dose distribution is not satisfactory with photons. However, the selection of patients for proton therapy needs to be done using evidence-based medicine to build arguments in favor of personalized precision radiation therapy. Referral to proton therapy versus IMRT or SBRT should be registered (ProtonShare® platform) and envisioned in a formalized clinical research perspective through randomized trials. The use of an enrichment process using a model-based approach should be done to only randomize patients doomed to benefit from proton. To tackle such great opportunities, the French proton therapy challenge is to collaborate at the national and international levels, and to demonstrate that the extra-costs of treatment are worth clinically and economically in the short, mid, and long-term. In parallel to the clinical developments, there are still preclinical issues to be tackled (e.g., proton FLASH, mini-beams, combination with immunotherapy), for which the French Radiotransnet network offers a unique platform. The current article provides a personal view of the challenges and opportunities with a focus on clinical research and randomized trial requirements as well as the needs for strong collaborations at the national and international levels for PT in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck to date.

The Prognostic Value of the New Combined Hemo-Eosinophil Inflammation Index (HEI Index): A Multicenter Analysis of Anal Cancer Patients Treated with Concurrent Chemo-Radiation

Anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is a rare tumor, and bio-humoral predictors of response to chemo-radiation (CT-RT) are lacking. We developed a prognostic score system based on laboratory inflammation parameters. We investigated the correlation between baseline clinical and laboratory variables and disease-free (DFS) and overall (OS) survival in anal SCC patients treated with CT-RT in five institutions. The bio-humoral parameters of significance were included in a new scoring system, which was tested with other significant variables in a Cox's proportional hazard model. A total of 308 patients was included. We devised a prognostic model by combining baseline hemoglobin level, SII, and eosinophil count: the Hemo-Eosinophils Inflammation (HEI) Index. We stratified patients according to the HEI index into low- and high-risk groups. Median DFS for low-risk patients was not reached, and it was found to be 79.5 months for high-risk cases (Hazard Ratio 3.22; 95% CI: 2.04-5.10; p < 0.0001). Following adjustment for clinical covariates found significant at univariate analysis, multivariate analysis confirmed the HEI index as an independent prognostic factor for DFS and OS. The HEI index was shown to be a prognostic parameter for DFS and OS in anal cancer patients treated with CT-RT. An external validation of the HEI index is mandatory for its use in clinical practice.

Immune inflammation indicators in anal cancer patients treated with concurrent chemoradiation: training and validation cohort with online calculator (ARC: Anal Cancer Response Classifier)

Background: In anal cancer, there are no markers nor other laboratory indexes that can predict prognosis and guide clinical practice for patients treated with concurrent chemoradiation. In this study, we retrospectively investigated the influence of immune inflammation indicators on treatment outcome of anal cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

Methods: All patients had a histologically proven diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal/margin treated with chemoradiotherapy according to the Nigro’s regimen. Impact on prognosis of pre-treatment systemic index of inflammation (SII) (platelet x neutrophil/lymphocyte), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were analyzed.

Results: A total of 161 consecutive patients were available for the analysis. Response to treatment was the single most important factor for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). At univariate analysis, higher SII level was significantly correlated to lower PFS (p<0.01) and OS (p=0.046). NLR level was significantly correlated to PFS (p=0.05), but not to OS (p=0.06). PLR level significantly affected both PFS (p<0.01) and OS (p=0.02). On multivariate analysis pre-treatment, SII level was significantly correlated to PFS (p=0.0079), but not to OS (p=0.15). We developed and externally validated on a cohort of 147 patients a logistic nomogram using SII, nodal status and pre-treatment Hb levels. Results showed a good predictive ability with C-index of 0.74. An online available calculator has also been developed.

Conclusion: The low cost and easy profile in terms of determination and reproducibility make SII a promising tool for prognostic assessment in this oncological setting.

Neuroendocrine late effects after tailored photon radiotherapy for children with low grade gliomas: Long term correlation with tumour and treatment parameters

PURPOSE

To evaluate neuroendocrine late effects in paediatric patients with low grade glioma (LGG) who underwent radiotherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIAL

We performed a retrospective evaluation of 40 children with LGG treated from July 2002 to January 2015 with external radiotherapy. Tumour locations were cerebral hemisphere (n=2); posterior fossa (n=15); hypothalamic-pituitary axis (HPA, n=15); spine (n=5). Three patients presented a diffuse disease. We looked for a correlation between endocrine toxicity and tumour and treatment parameters. The impact of some clinical and demographic factors on endocrinal and neuro toxicity was evaluated using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 52months (range: 2-151). Median age at irradiation was 6. The dose to the HPA was significantly associated with endocrine toxicity (P value=0.0190). Patients who received chemotherapy before radiotherapy and younger patients, showed worse performance status and lower IQ. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) rates were 94% and 73.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Radiotherapy showed excellent OS and PFS rates and acceptable late neuroendocrine toxicity profile in this population of LGG patients treated over a period of 13years. In our experience, the dose to the HPA was predictive of the risk of late endocrine toxicity.

Radiosurgery with Helical Tomotherapy: Outcomes for Patients with One or Multifocal Brain Metastasis

To evaluate the feasibility and report the preliminary results for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) treatments of single or multiple brain metastases delivered with helical tomotherapy (HT) by means of the InterFix™ Radiosurgery kit. Between September 2010 and August 2012, thirty patients underwent SRS for treatment of 46 brain metastases with a median prescription dose of 20 Gy (range 15-21 Gy). Clinical response was assessed with 2-3 month intervals by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Dose distribution indexes were computed and compared with published data for SRS performed with dedicated machines. After a median follow-up of 14 months (range 4-31) the estimated overall survival (OS) rate was 70% at 6 months, 60% at 12 months and 44% at 18 months. Local control (LC) was 72% at 6 months, 65% at 12 months and 50% at 18 months. Acute toxicity as headache and epileptic crisis occurred in only two patients. The mean values of conformity, homogeneity and gradient score indexes were 1.36, 1.04 and 50 respectively. HT-SRS for single or multiple brain metastases appears a reliable technique with encouraging clinical outcomes and competitive dosimetrical results.

Hypofractionated irradiation of infra-supraclavicular lymph nodes after axillary dissection in patients with breast cancer post-conservative surgery: impact on late toxicity

Background

The aim of the present work was to analyse the impact of mild hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) of infra-supraclavicular lymph nodes after axillary dissection on late toxicity.

Methods

From 2007 to 2012, 100 females affected by breast cancer (pT1- T4, pN1-3, pMx) were treated with conservative surgery, Axillary Node Dissection (AND) and loco-regional radiotherapy (whole breast plus infra-supraclavicular fossa). Axillary lymph nodes metastases were confirmed in all women. The median age at diagnosis was 60 years (range 34–83). Tumors were classified according to molecular characteristics: luminal-A 59 pts (59 %), luminal-B 24 pts (24 %), basal-like 10 pts (10 %), Her-2 like 7 pts (7 %). 82 pts (82 %) received hormonal therapy, 9 pts (9 %) neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, 81pts (81 %) adjuvant chemotherapy. All patients received a mild hypofractionated RT: 46 Gy in 20 fractions 4 times a week to whole breast and infra-supraclavicular fossa plus an additional weekly dose of 1,2 Gy to the lumpectomy area. The disease control and treatment related toxicity were analysed in follow-up visits. The extent of lymphedema was analysed by experts in Oncological Rehabilitation.

Results

Within a median follow-up of 50 months (range 19–82), 6 (6 %) pts died, 1 pt (1 %) had local progression disease, 2 pts (2 %) developed distant metastasis and 1 subject (1 %) presented both. In all patients the acute toxicity was mainly represented by erythema and patchy moist desquamation. At the end of radiotherapy 27 pts (27 %) presented lymphedema, but only 10 cases (10 %) seemed to be correlated to radiotherapy. None of the patients showed a severe damage to the brachial plexus, and the described cases of paresthesias could not definitely be attributed to RT. We did not observe symptomatic pneumonitis.

Conclusions

Irradiation of infra-supraclavicular nodes with a mild hypofractionated schedule can be a safe and effective treatment without evidence of a significant increase of lymphedema appearance radiotherapy related.

Once-weekly stereotactic radiotherapy for patients with oligometastases: compliance and preliminary efficacy

AIMS AND BACKGROUND

This retrospective analysis reports the outcomes obtained with an original once-weekly stereotactic radiotherapy fractionation given to patients affected by evolving oligometastases from different solid malignancies.

METHODS

From 2009 to 2011, patients with symptomatic and/or evolving oligometastases were submitted to a median 5-fraction cycle of stereotactic radiotherapy of one fraction per week in order to exploit a radiobiological rationale designed to increase the therapeutic index. Individual fractionation was mainly planned according to patient performance status, oligometastasis size and site, and record of previous irradiation in the same site.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients in stage IV UICC-TNM affected by oligometastases were treated with image-guided intensity-modulated stereotactic tomotherapy with a single weekly radiation. Median age was 70 years (range, 34-89). The median weekly single dose, number of fractions and overall total radiation dose were 7 Gy, 5 fractions and 35 Gy, respectively. Thirty-five (97%) patients completed the treatment schedule. No patient suffered mild or severe radiation-related side effects. Twenty-one (87%) of 24 patients with local pain had complete symptomatic response within 30 days following the end of radiotherapy. Local control assessed at imaging after stereotactic radiotherapy was evidenced in 30 (83%) patients. Median time to response after the end of radiotherapy was 40 days.

CONCLUSIONS

The original radiotherapy regimen delivering only a single stereotactic dose per week seems to be highly feasible with an interesting high efficacy rate in patients with oligometastases from different solid tumors. Overall, the once-weekly treatment was very compliant in an advanced cancer stage especially for elderly and frail patients.

Once-weekly stereotactic radiotherapy for patients with oligometastases: compliance and preliminary efficacy

AIMS AND BACKGROUND

This retrospective analysis reports the outcomes obtained with an original once-weekly stereotactic radiotherapy fractionation given to patients affected by evolving oligometastases from different solid malignancies.

METHODS

From 2009 to 2011, patients with symptomatic and/or evolving oligometastases were submitted to a median 5-fraction cycle of stereotactic radiotherapy of one fraction per week in order to exploit a radiobiological rationale designed to increase the therapeutic index. Individual fractionation was mainly planned according to patient performance status, oligometastasis size and site, and record of previous irradiation in the same site.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients in stage IV UICC-TNM affected by oligometastases were treated with image-guided intensity-modulated stereotactic tomotherapy with a single weekly radiation. Median age was 70 years (range, 34-89). The median weekly single dose, number of fractions and overall total radiation dose were 7 Gy, 5 fractions and 35 Gy, respectively. Thirty-five (97%) patients completed the treatment schedule. No patient suffered mild or severe radiation-related side effects. Twenty-one (87%) of 24 patients with local pain had complete symptomatic response within 30 days following the end of radiotherapy. Local control assessed at imaging after stereotactic radiotherapy was evidenced in 30 (83%) patients. Median time to response after the end of radiotherapy was 40 days.

CONCLUSIONS

The original radiotherapy regimen delivering only a single stereotactic dose per week seems to be highly feasible with an interesting high efficacy rate in patients with oligometastases from different solid tumors. Overall, the once-weekly treatment was very compliant in an advanced cancer stage especially for elderly and frail patients.