1
|
Manuel K, Crotty M, Kurrle SE, Cameron ID, Lane R, Lockwood K, Block H, Sherrington C, Pond D, Nguyen TA, Laver K. Hospital-Based Health Professionals' Perceptions of Frailty in Older People. Gerontologist 2024:gnae041. [PMID: 38712983 DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnae041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 05/08/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES There is a high prevalence of frailty amongst older patients in hospital settings. Frailty guidelines exist but implementation to date has been challenging. Understanding health professional attitudes, knowledge, and beliefs about frailty is critical in understanding barriers and enablers to guideline implementation and the aim of this study was to understand these in rehabilitation multidisciplinary teams in hospital settings. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Twenty-three semi-structured interviews were conducted with health professionals working in multi-disciplinary teams on geriatric and rehabilitation wards in Adelaide and Sydney, Australia. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and coded by two researchers. A codebook was created and interviews re-coded and applied to the Framework Method of thematic analysis. RESULTS Three domains were developed: diagnosing frailty, communicating about frailty, and managing frailty. Within these domains, eight themes were identified: (1) diagnosing frailty has questionable benefits, (2) clinicians don't use frailty screening tools, (3) frailty can be diagnosed on appearance and history, (4) frailty has a stigma, (5) clinicians don't use the word "frail" with patients, (6) frailty isn't always reversible, (7) there is a lack of continuity of care after acute admission, and (8) the community setting lacks resources. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS Implementation of frailty guidelines will remain challenging while staff avoid using the term "frail", don't perceive benefit of using screening tools, and focus on the individual aspects of frailty rather than the syndrome holistically. Clinical champions and education about frailty identification, reversibility, management, and communication techniques may improve the implementation of frailty guidelines in hospitals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kisani Manuel
- Rehabilitation, Aged and Palliative Care Service, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
| | - Maria Crotty
- Rehabilitation, Aged and Palliative Care Service, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
- Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
| | - Susan E Kurrle
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Rehabilitation and Aged Care Services, Northern Sydney Local Health District, Hornsby, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ian D Cameron
- Rehabilitation and Aged Care Services, Northern Sydney Local Health District, Hornsby, New South Wales, Australia
- John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rachel Lane
- Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
| | - Keri Lockwood
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Heather Block
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
| | - Catherine Sherrington
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Dimity Pond
- Wicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Tuan A Nguyen
- Social Gerontology Division, National Ageing Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kate Laver
- Rehabilitation, Aged and Palliative Care Service, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gibson C, Goeman D, Pond D, Yates M, Hutchinson A. General practice nurse perceptions of barriers and facilitators to implementation of best-practice dementia care recommendations-a qualitative interview study. BMC Prim Care 2024; 25:147. [PMID: 38698316 PMCID: PMC11064280 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-024-02401-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION With an aging population and a growing prevalence of people living with dementia, the demand for best-practice dementia care in general practice increases. There is an opportunity to better utilise the nurse role within the primary care team to meet this increasing demand in the provision of care for people living with dementia. However, general practice nurses have limited knowledge in the provision of best-practice care for people living with dementia and their carer(s). A number of best-practice dementia care recommendations contained in the Australian Clinical Practice Guidelines and Principles of Care for People with Dementia have been identified as highly relevant to the role of the general practice nurse. AIMS To explore general practice nurses' perspectives on published best-practice dementia care recommendations relevant to their role and identify barriers and facilitators to their implementation into clinical practice. METHODS Thirteen Australian general practice nurses took part in this qualitative interview study. The research questions for this study were addressed within a paradigmatic framework of social constructionism. Data were transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed. RESULTS There was a high level of agreement between general practice nurses that the recommendations were important, reflected best-practice dementia care and were relevant to their role. However the recommendations were perceived as limited in their usefulness to nurses' clinical practice due to being too vague and lacking direction. Four main themes were identified describing barriers and facilitators to operationalising best-practice dementia care.: creating a comfortable environment; changing approach to care; optimising the general practice nurse role and working collaboratively. Nine sub-themes were described: physical environment; social environment; complexity of care; care planning for the family; professional role and identity, funding better dementia care, education, networking and resources; different roles, one team; and interagency communication. CONCLUSION This study identified several factors that need addressing to support general practice nurses to integrate best-practice dementia care recommendations into daily clinical practice. The development of interventions needs to include strategies to mitigate potential barriers and enhance facilitators that they perceive impact on their delivery of best-practice care for people living with dementia and their carer(s). The knowledge gained in this study could be used to develop multi-faceted interventions informed by theoretical implementation change models to enable the general practice nurse to operationalise best-practice dementia care recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Gibson
- University of Newcastle, School of Medicine and Public Health, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.
- Grampians Health, Ballarat, Australia.
| | - Dianne Goeman
- University of Newcastle, School of Medicine and Public Health, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, The Alfred Centre, Melbourne, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | - Dimity Pond
- University of Tasmania, Wicking Dementia and Teaching Centre, Hobart, Australia
| | - Mark Yates
- Deakin University, School of Medicine, Geelong, Australia
- Grampians Health, Ballarat, Australia
| | - Alison Hutchinson
- Deakin University, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Burwood, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, The Alfred Centre, Melbourne, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sturmberg JP, Gainsford L, Goodwin N, Pond D. Systemic failures in nursing home care-A scoping study. J Eval Clin Pract 2024; 30:484-496. [PMID: 38258966 DOI: 10.1111/jep.13961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2023] [Revised: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/31/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
Nursing homes (also referred to as residential aged care facilities, or long-term care facilities) cater for older people on a respite or long-term basis for those who are no longer able to live independently at home. Globally the sector struggles to meet societal expectations since it is torn between three competing agendas-meeting the needs of residents, meeting the demands of regulators, and meeting the financial imperatives of nursing home proprietors. Competing demands indicate that the system lacks a clear understanding of its purpose-without a clearly understood purpose any system will become dysfunctional overall and across all its levels of organisation. This scoping study aims to summarise and synthesise what is already known about the systemic function and failures in the nursing home system, and the impact this has on the wider health and aged care system. METHOD MEDLINE, EMBASE, PSYCHINFO, CINAHL and SCOPUS were searched using the terms: (nursing home care OR residential aged care OR nursing home) AND (organisational failure OR institutional failure OR systemic failure), limited to English language articles, including all years up to the end of February 2021. In addition, we used snowballing of article references and Google searches of the grey literature. System-focused articles were defined as those that explored how an issue at one system level impacted other system levels, or how an issue impacted at least two different agents at the same system level. RESULT Thirty-eight articles addressed systemic issues as defined in four different contexts: United States (14), Canada (2), Australia (11) and European countries (11). Only four studies reported whole-of-system findings, whereas the remaining 34 more narrowly addressed systemic features of specific nursing home issues. The thematic analysis identified 29 key systemic issues across five system layers which consistently appear across every country/health system context. The negative outcomes of these systemic failings include: high rates of regulatory reprimands for unacceptable or unsafe practices; dissatisfaction in care experiences on the part of residents, families, and care staff-including a fear of being sent to a nursing home; and the perception amongst staff that nursing homes are not preferred places to work. CONCLUSIONS The key issues affecting nursing home residents, and the care home sector more generally, are systemic in nature arising from two key issues: first, the lack of shared agreement on the care home system's purpose; and second, the lack of clear governance and accountability frameworks for system regulation and performance at a national level. Addressing these two key issues must be the starting point for any 'real' nursing home system redesign that can achieve a seamlessly integrated system that delivers the outcomes nursing home residents and their families expect. 'Systems thinking' is required to simultaneously improve care quality and outcomes for residents, strengthen regulation and accountability, and enable financial viability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joachim P Sturmberg
- College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
- International Society for Systems and Complexity Sciences for Health, Australia
| | - Len Gainsford
- Australian Government Tertiary Education Quality & Standards Agency Audit & Risk Committee & Chair, Transport Safety Victoria Audit Committee, Australia
- Centre for Enterprise Performance, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nicholas Goodwin
- Central Coast Research Institute for Integrated Care, University of Newcastle and the Central Coast Local Health District, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Dimity Pond
- Wicking Dementia Research and Training Centre, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sturmberg JP, Gainsford L, Pond D, Goodwin N. Fit-for-purpose-The bottom-up redesign of the nursing home system: The Australian Aged Care System. J Eval Clin Pract 2024; 30:511-520. [PMID: 38606518 DOI: 10.1111/jep.13987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2024] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024]
Abstract
Nursing homes struggle to meet the needs of their residents as they become older and frailer, live with more complex co-morbidity, and are impacted by memory impairment and dementia. Moreover, the nursing home system is overwhelmed with significantly constraining organisational and regulatory demands that stand in the way of achieving resident-focused outcomes. These issues are compounded by the perceptions of poor working environments, poor remuneration, and poor satisfaction amongst staff. The system is beyond the state of 'reform' and requires a fundamental redesign based on first organisational systems understandings: a clearly defined purpose and goal, shared values, and system-wide agreed "simple (or operating) rules". A 'fit-for-purpose' future requires a complex adaptive nursing home system characterised by seamless 'bottom-up and top-down' information flows to ensure that the necessary 'work that needs to be done' is done, and a governance structure that focuses on quality improvement and holds the system accountable for the quality of care that is provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joachim P Sturmberg
- College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- International Society for Systems and Complexity Sciences for Health, Waitsfield, Vermont, USA
| | - Len Gainsford
- Australian Government Tertiary Education Quality & Standards Agency Audit & Risk Committee & Chair, Transport Safety Victoria Audit Committee, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Enterprise Performance, Swinburne University of Technology, VIC, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Len Gainsford and Associates, Wamberal, Australia
| | - Dimity Pond
- Wicking Dementia Research and Training Centre, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Nicholas Goodwin
- Central Coast Research Institute for Integrated Care, University of Newcastle and the Central Coast Local Health District, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- Central Coast Local Health District, Gosford, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Holdaway M, Hyde Z, Hughson JA, Malay R, Stafford A, Fulford K, Radford K, Flicker L, Smith K, Pond D, Russell S, Atkinson D, Blackberry I, LoGiudice D. Medications and cognitive risk in Aboriginal primary care: a cross-sectional study. Intern Med J 2023. [PMID: 38158855 DOI: 10.1111/imj.16323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are ageing with high rates of comorbidity, yet little is known about suboptimal prescribing in this population. AIM The prevalence of potentially suboptimal prescribing and associated risk factors were investigated among older patients attending primary care through Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services (ACCHSs). METHODS Medical records of 420 systematically selected patients aged ≥50 years attending urban, rural and remote health services were audited. Polypharmacy (≥ 5 prescribed medications), potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) as per Beers Criteria and anticholinergic burden (ACB) were estimated and associated risk factors were explored with logistic regression. RESULTS The prevalence of polypharmacy, PIMs and ACB score ≥3 was 43%, 18% and 12% respectively. In multivariable logistic regression analyses, polypharmacy was less likely in rural (odds ratio (OR) = 0.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.24-0.77) compared to urban patients, and more likely in those with heart disease (OR = 2.62, 95% CI = 1.62-4.25), atrial fibrillation (OR = 4.25, 95% CI = 1.08-16.81), hypertension (OR = 2.14, 95% CI = 1.34-3.44), diabetes (OR = 2.72, 95% CI = 1.69-4.39) or depression (OR = 1.91, 95% CI = 1.19-3.06). PIMs were more frequent in females (OR = 1.88, 95% CI = 1.03-3.42) and less frequent in rural (OR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.19-0.85) and remote (OR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.29-1.18) patients. Factors associated with PIMs were kidney disease (OR = 2.60, 95% CI = 1.37-4.92), urinary incontinence (OR = 3.00, 95% CI = 1.02-8.83), depression (OR = 2.67, 95% CI = 1.50-4.77), heavy alcohol use (OR = 2.83, 95% CI = 1.39-5.75) and subjective cognitive concerns (OR = 2.69, 95% CI = 1.31-5.52). High ACB was less common in rural (OR = 0.10, 95% CI = 0.03-0.34) and remote (OR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.25-1.04) patients and more common in those with kidney disease (OR = 3.07, 95% CI = 1.50-6.30) or depression (OR = 3.32, 95% CI = 1.70-6.47). CONCLUSION Associations between potentially suboptimal prescribing and depression or cognitive concerns highlight the importance of considering medication review and deprescribing for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marycarol Holdaway
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Zoë Hyde
- Western Australian Centre for Health and Ageing, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Jo-Anne Hughson
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Roslyn Malay
- Western Australian Centre for Health and Ageing, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Andrew Stafford
- Curtin Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Kate Fulford
- Western Australian Centre for Health and Ageing, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Kylie Radford
- Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Leon Flicker
- Western Australian Centre for Health and Ageing, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Kate Smith
- Centre for Aboriginal Medical and Dental Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Dimity Pond
- Department of General Practice, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sarah Russell
- College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia
| | - David Atkinson
- Rural Clinical School, University of Western Australia, Broome, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Irene Blackberry
- La Trobe University, John Richards Centre for Rural Ageing Research, Wodonga, Victoria, Australia
| | - Dina LoGiudice
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department Aged Care, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gibson C, Goeman D, Yates M, Pond D. Best-practice recommendations to inform general practice nurses in the provision of dementia care: a Delphi study. Aust J Prim Health 2023; 29:643-649. [PMID: 37345268 DOI: 10.1071/py22276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 05/27/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Worldwide, responsibility for dementia diagnosis and management is shifting to primary care, in particular to the general practitioner (GP). It has been acknowledged that primary care nurses, working collaboratively with GPs, have a role in dementia care by utilising their unique knowledge and skills. However, there are no best-practice guidelines or care pathways to inform nurses in general practice on what best-practice dementia care comprises and how to implement this into their practice. This study identified the recommendations in the Australian guidelines for dementia management most relevant to the role of the nurse working in general practice. METHODS Seventeen experts active in clinical practice and/or research in primary care nursing in general practice participated in an online three-round Delphi study. RESULTS All 17 participants were female with a nursing qualification and experienced in general practice clinical nursing and/or general practice nursing research. Five recommendations were identified as the most relevant to the role of the nurse in general practice. These recommendations all contained elements of person-centred care: the delivery of individualised information, ongoing support, including the carer in decision-making, and they also align with the areas where GPs want support in dementia care provision. CONCLUSION This novel study identified best-practice dementia care recommendations specific to nurses in general practice. These recommendations will inform a model of care for nurses in the provision of dementia care that supports GPs and better meets the needs of people living with dementia and their carer(s).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Gibson
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia; and Grampians Health, Ballarat, Vic. 3350, Australia
| | - Dianne Goeman
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia; and Central Clinical School, Monash University, The Alfred Centre, Melbourne, Vic. 3004, Australia
| | - Mark Yates
- Grampians Health, Ballarat, Vic. 3350, Australia; and Deakin University School of Medicine, Ballarat Clinical School, Ballarat, Vic. 3350, Australia
| | - Dimity Pond
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
McNeil K, Pond D. Clinical approach to driving and the older person. Aust J Gen Pract 2023; 52:512-515. [PMID: 37532445 DOI: 10.31128/ajgp-01-23-6693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Austroads has recently introduced a new set of guidelines for driving assessment in Australia. It is therefore timely to review the clinical approach to driving assessments, which is often seen as one of the most difficult areas of general practice. OBJECTIVE This article reviews the difficulties of driving assessment, including what measures there are to guide general practitioners (GPs), and proposes a practical approach to this issue for general practice. DISCUSSION There is as yet no widely agreed toolkit for office-based driving assessment in general practice. On-road assessment by a trained assessor, such as an occupational therapist, remains the gold standard. GPs should consider a stepped approach to driving cessation by raising this issue well in advance of the need for licence termination, working with the patient and the family through the driving cessation itself and providing follow-up support for the patient afterwards.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen McNeil
- PhD, MBA, BComm, Senior Research Officer, University of Newcastle, NSW
| | - Dimity Pond
- BA, MBBS, FRACGP, PhD, Adjunct Professor, School of Rural Medicine, University of New England, Armidale, NSW; Adjunct Professor, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW; Clinical Professor, Wicking Dementia Research Education Centre, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tas
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Manuel K, Block H, Crotty M, Harvey G, Kurrle SE, Cameron I, Lockwood K, Sherrington C, Pond D, Nguyen TA, Laver K. Implementation of a frailty intervention in the transition from hospital to home: a realist process evaluation protocol for the FORTRESS trial. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e070267. [PMID: 37295839 PMCID: PMC10277088 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Frailty in Older people: Rehabilitation, Treatment, Research Examining Separate Settings (the FORTRESS study) is a multisite, hybrid type II, stepped wedge, cluster, randomised trial examining the uptake and outcomes of a frailty intervention. The intervention is based on the 2017 Asia Pacific Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Frailty and begins in the acute hospital setting and transitions to the community. The success of the intervention will require individual and organisational behaviour change within a dynamic health system. This process evaluation will examine the multiple variables at play in the context and mechanism of the frailty intervention to enhance understanding of the outcomes of the FORTRESS study and how the outcomes can be translated from the trial into broader practice. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The FORTRESS intervention will recruit participants from six wards in New South Wales and South Australia, Australia. Participants of the process evaluation will include trial investigators, ward-based clinicians, FORTRESS implementation clinicians, general practitioners and FORTRESS participants. The process evaluation has been designed using realist methodology and will occur in parallel to the FORTRESS trial. A mixed-method approach will be used with qualitative and quantitative data collected from interviews, questionnaires, checklists and outcome assessments. Qualitative and quantitative data will be examined for CMOCs (Context, Mechanism, Outcome Configurations) and programme theories will be developed, tested and refined. This will facilitate development of more generalisable theories to inform translation of frailty intervention within complex healthcare systems. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval for the FORTRESS trial, inclusive of the process evaluation, has been obtained from the Northern Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committees reference number 2020/ETH01057. Recruitment for the FORTRESS trial uses opt-out consent. Dissemination will be via publications, conferences and social media. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ACTRN12620000760976p (FORTRESS trial).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kisani Manuel
- Division of Rehabilitation, Aged and Palliative Care, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
- Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
| | - Heather Block
- Division of Rehabilitation, Aged and Palliative Care, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
| | - Maria Crotty
- Division of Rehabilitation, Aged and Palliative Care, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
- Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
| | - Gillian Harvey
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
| | - Susan E Kurrle
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Rehabilitation and Aged Care Services, Northern Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ian Cameron
- Rehabilitation and Aged Care Services, Northern Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Keri Lockwood
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Catherine Sherrington
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Dimity Pond
- Wicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Tuan A Nguyen
- Social Gerontology Division, National Ageing Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kate Laver
- Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ellison TS, Cappa SF, Garrett D, Georges J, Iwatsubo T, Kramer JH, Lehmann M, Lyketsos C, Maier AB, Merrilees J, Morris JC, Naismith SL, Nobili F, Pahor M, Pond D, Robinson L, Soysal P, Vandenbulcke M, Weber CJ, Visser PJ, Weiner M, Frisoni GB. Outcome measures for Alzheimer's disease: A global inter-societal Delphi consensus. Alzheimers Dement 2023; 19:2707-2729. [PMID: 36749854 PMCID: PMC11010236 DOI: 10.1002/alz.12945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We aim to provide guidance on outcomes and measures for use in patients with Alzheimer's clinical syndrome. METHODS A consensus group of 20 voting members nominated by 10 professional societies, and a non-voting chair, used a Delphi approach and modified GRADE criteria. RESULTS Consensus was reached on priority outcomes (n = 66), measures (n = 49) and statements (n = 37) across nine domains. A number of outcomes and measurement instruments were ranked for: Cognitive abilities; Functional abilities/dependency; Behavioural and neuropsychiatric symptoms; Patient quality of life (QoL); Caregiver QoL; Healthcare and treatment-related outcomes; Medical investigations; Disease-related life events; and Global outcomes. DISCUSSION This work provides indications on the domains and ideal pertinent measurement instruments that clinicians may wish to use to follow patients with cognitive impairment. More work is needed to develop instruments that are more feasible in the context of the constraints of clinical routine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Stefano F. Cappa
- Scuola Universitaria Superiore IUSS Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- Dementia Research Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | | | | | - Takeshi Iwatsubo
- Unit for Early and Exploratory Clinical Development, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Neuropathology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Joel H. Kramer
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | | | - Constantine Lyketsos
- Richman Family Precision Medicine Center of Excellence in Alzheimer’s Disease, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University and Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - Andrea B. Maier
- Department of Medicine and Aged Care, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Department of Human Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Healthy Longevity Translational Research Program, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Centre for Healthy Longevity, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jennifer Merrilees
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - John C. Morris
- Department of Neurology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Sharon L. Naismith
- School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Flavio Nobili
- UO Clinica Neurologica, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, and Child and Mother Health, University of Genoa, Genova, Italy
| | - Marco Pahor
- Department of Aging and Geriatric Research, Institute on Aging, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Dimity Pond
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Louise Robinson
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Pinar Soysal
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Bezmialem Vakif University, Istanbul, Turkey
- European Society of Geriatric Medicine, Dementia Special Interest Group
| | - Mathieu Vandenbulcke
- Neuropsychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Geriatric Psychiatry, University Psychiatric Centre KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Pieter Jelle Visser
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
- Alzheimer Center, Department of Neurology, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Neurogeriatrics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Michael Weiner
- San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Giovanni B. Frisoni
- Laboratory of Neuroimaging of Aging (LANVIE), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Memory Clinic, Department of Readaptation and Geriatrics, Geneva University and University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Logan B, Viecelli AK, Johnson DW, Aquino EM, Bailey J, Comans TA, Gray LC, Hawley CM, Hickey LE, Janda M, Jaure A, Jose MD, Kalaw E, Kiriwandeniya C, Matsuyama M, Mihala G, Nguyen KH, Pascoe E, Pole JD, Polkinghorne KR, Pond D, Raj R, Reidlinger DM, Scholes-Robertson N, Varghese J, Wong G, Hubbard RE. Study protocol for The GOAL Trial: comprehensive geriatric assessment for frail older people with chronic kidney disease to increase attainment of patient-identified goals-a cluster randomised controlled trial. Trials 2023; 24:365. [PMID: 37254217 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07363-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND An increasing number of older people are living with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Many have complex healthcare needs and are at risk of deteriorating health and functional status, which can adversely affect their quality of life. Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is an effective intervention to improve survival and independence of older people, but its clinical utility and cost-effectiveness in frail older people living with CKD is unknown. METHODS The GOAL Trial is a pragmatic, multi-centre, open-label, superiority, cluster randomised controlled trial developed by consumers, clinicians, and researchers. It has a two-arm design, CGA compared with standard care, with 1:1 allocation of a total of 16 clusters. Within each cluster, study participants ≥ 65 years of age (or ≥ 55 years if Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander (First Nations Australians)) with CKD stage 3-5/5D who are frail, measured by a Frailty Index (FI) of > 0.25, are recruited. Participants in intervention clusters receive a CGA by a geriatrician to identify medical, social, and functional needs, optimise medication prescribing, and arrange multidisciplinary referral if required. Those in standard care clusters receive usual care. The primary outcome is attainment of self-identified goals assessed by standardised Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) at 3 months. Secondary outcomes include GAS at 6 and 12 months, quality of life (EQ-5D-5L), frailty (Frailty Index - Short Form), transfer to residential aged care facilities, cost-effectiveness, and safety (cause-specific hospitalisations, mortality). A process evaluation will be conducted in parallel with the trial including whether the intervention was delivered as intended, any issue or local barriers to intervention delivery, and perceptions of the intervention by participants. The trial has 90% power to detect a clinically meaningful mean difference in GAS of 10 units. DISCUSSION This trial addresses patient-prioritised outcomes. It will be conducted, disseminated and implemented by clinicians and researchers in partnership with consumers. If CGA is found to have clinical and cost-effectiveness for frail older people with CKD, the intervention framework could be embedded into routine clinical practice. The implementation of the trial's findings will be supported by presentations at conferences and forums with clinicians and consumers at specifically convened workshops, to enable rapid adoption into practice and policy for both nephrology and geriatric disciplines. It has potential to materially advance patient-centred care and improve clinical and patient-reported outcomes (including quality of life) for frail older people living with CKD. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04538157. Registered on 3 September 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Logan
- Centre for Health Services Research, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
| | - A K Viecelli
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Department of Kidney and Transplant Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - D W Johnson
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Department of Kidney and Transplant Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Disease Research, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia
| | - E M Aquino
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - J Bailey
- Centre for Health Services Research, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - T A Comans
- Centre for Health Services Research, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - L C Gray
- Centre for Health Services Research, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - C M Hawley
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Department of Kidney and Transplant Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - L E Hickey
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - M Janda
- Centre for Health Services Research, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - A Jaure
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - M D Jose
- Renal Unit, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia
| | - E Kalaw
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - C Kiriwandeniya
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - M Matsuyama
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - G Mihala
- Centre for Health Services Research, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - K H Nguyen
- Centre for Health Services Research, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Global Brain Health Institute, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland
| | - E Pascoe
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - J D Pole
- Centre for Health Services Research, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, The University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - K R Polkinghorne
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Nephrology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - D Pond
- School of Rural Medicine, University of New England, Armidale, Australia
- Wicking Centre, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia
- School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia
| | - R Raj
- School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia
- Department of Nephrology, Launceston General Hospital, Launceston, Australia
| | - D M Reidlinger
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - N Scholes-Robertson
- Rural and Remote Health, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - J Varghese
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - G Wong
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia
- Centre for Transplant and Renal Research, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - R E Hubbard
- Centre for Health Services Research, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Block H, Annesley A, Lockwood K, Xu L, Cameron ID, Laver K, Crotty M, Sherrington C, Kifley A, Howard K, Pond D, Nguyen TA, Kurrle SE. Frailty in older people: Rehabilitation Treatment Research Examining Separate Settings (FORTRESS): protocol for a hybrid type II stepped wedge, cluster, randomised trial. BMC Geriatr 2022; 22:527. [PMID: 35761212 PMCID: PMC9235164 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-022-03178-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Accepted: 05/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Frailty in older people is associated with increased risk of falls, longer length of stay in hospital, increased risk of institutionalisation and death. Frailty can be measured using validated tools. Multi-component frailty interventions are recommended in clinical practice guidelines but are not routinely implemented in clinical practice. Methods The Frailty in Older people: Rehabilitation, Treatment, Research Examining Separate Settings (FORTRESS) trial is a multisite, hybrid type II, stepped wedge, cluster, randomised trial with blinded assessment and intention-to-treat analysis being conducted in Australia. The study aims to determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an embedded individualised multicomponent frailty intervention (commencing in hospital and continuing in the community) on readmissions, frailty and quality of life when compared with usual care. Frail older people admitted to study wards with no significant cognitive impairment, who are expected to return home after discharge, will be eligible to participate. Participants will receive extra sessions of physiotherapy, pharmacy, and dietetics during their admission. A Community Implementation Facilitator will coordinate implementation of the frailty management strategies and primary network liaison. The primary outcome is number of days of non-elective hospital readmissions during 12 month follow-up period. Secondary outcomes include frailty status measured using the FRAIL scale; quality of life measured using the EQ-5D-5L; and time-to-event for readmission and readmission rates. The total cost of delivering the intervention will be assessed, and cost-effectiveness analyses will be conducted. Economic evaluation will include analyses for health outcomes measured in terms of the main clinical outcomes. Implementation outcomes will be collected as part of a process evaluation. Recruitment commenced in 2020 and we are aiming to recruit 732 participants over the three-year duration of the study. Discussion This study will reveal whether intervening with frail older people to address factors contributing to frailty can reduce hospital readmissions and improve frailty status and quality of life. If the FORTRESS intervention provides a clinically significant and cost-effective result, it will demonstrate an improved approach to treating frail patients, both in hospital and when they return home. Trial Registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR): ACTRN12620000760976p. ANZCTR registered 24 July 2020. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-022-03178-1.
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The Zero Suicide (ZS) framework is increasingly used in Australia, but without published adaptations for older people, and limited access by older people when implemented. The aim of this paper is to inform Towards Zero Suicide (TZS) implementations to benefit older adults by considering the key differences in older adults at risk of suicide according to each clinical component of the ZS framework. CONCLUSION TZS aspires to reduce deaths by suicide for people within healthcare by refocusing interventions on suicidality rather than diagnosis alone, emphasising evidence-based practices and cultural change. For TZS to be effective for older people, it is essential to ensure practices are based upon evidence relevant to older people and to ensure ageism is effectively counteracted. Older adults have distinct patterns of help seeking and service use, accompanied by differences in risk factors, presentations, and outcomes of suicidal behaviours. Ageism affects assessment, decision-making and actions to address self-harm and suicide for older people. Immediate and longer-term actions are essential to effectively implement TZS in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Wand
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Australia; and Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Australia
| | - Roderick McKay
- NSW Health Education and Training Institute, North Parramatta, NSW, Australia
| | - Dimity Pond
- The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Implementing the Towards Zero Suicide (TZS) approach to suicide prevention in older adults requires evidence-based adaptation. This paper aims to highlight important differences and opportunities in healthcare service use by older adults relevant to implementation. CONCLUSION The TZS approach may prevent suicide in older adults, but only if implementation aligns with systemic differences in healthcare utilisation by older people. Of greatest importance in older adults are (1) most mental healthcare is delivered outside of specialist mental health services; (2) physical conditions and disability are major modifiable contributors to suicide that must be addressed within TZS; and (3) older people have very low use of Medicare-funded psychological services. Primary healthcare providers, who may be seeing older people at risk of suicide, are often neither equipped to provide expert assessment and care planning for often complex needs, nor may see this as their role. However, they are essential in providing pathways to care, which may prevent suicide. Leaders must recognise TZS for older people will usually involve multiple transitions. This requires engagement of key services with clear roles, targeted training, rapid access to specialist older persons mental health support and development of a new TZS element: the navigator.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roderick McKay
- NSW Health Education and Training Institute, North Parramatta, NSW, Australia
| | - Dimity Pond
- The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - Anne Wand
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Australia; and Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Knight AW, Tam CWM, Dennis S, Fraser J, Pond D. The role of quality improvement collaboratives in general practice: a qualitative systematic review. BMJ Open Qual 2022; 11:bmjoq-2021-001800. [PMID: 35589275 PMCID: PMC9121486 DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2021] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background This systematic review used qualitative methodologies to examine the role of quality improvement collaboratives (QICs) in general practice. The aim was to inform implementers and participants about the utility of using or participating in QICs in general practice. Methods Included studies were published in English, used a QIC intervention, reported primary research, used qualitative or mixed methods, and were conducted in general practice. A Medline search between January 1995 and February 2020 was developed and extended to include Embase, CINAHL and PsycInfo databases. Articles were sought through chaining of references and grey literature searches. Qualitative outcome data were extracted using a framework analysis. Data were analysed using thematic synthesis. Articles were assessed for quality using a threshold approach based on the criteria described by Dixon-Woods. Results 15 qualitative and 18 mixed-methods studies of QICs in general practice were included. Data were grouped into four analytical themes which describe the role of a collaborative in general practice: improving the target topic, developing practices and providers, developing the health system and building quality improvement capacity. Discussion General practice collaboratives are reported to be useful for improving target topics. They can also develop knowledge and motivation in providers, build systems and team work in local practice organisations, and improve support at a system level. Collaboratives can build quality improvement capacity in the primary care system. These roles suggest that QICs are well matched to the improvement needs of general practice. General practice participants in collaboratives reported positive effects from effective peer interaction, high-quality local support, real engagement with data and well-designed training in quality improvement. Strengths of this study were an inclusive search and explicit qualitative methodology. It is possible some studies were missed. Qualitative studies of collaboratives may be affected by selection bias and confirmation bias. PROSPERO registration number CRD4202017512.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Walter Knight
- The Primary and Integrated Care Unit, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia .,School of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Chun Wah Michael Tam
- The Primary and Integrated Care Unit, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.,School of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sarah Dennis
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Ingham Institute, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
| | - John Fraser
- School of Rural Medicine, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia.,School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Dimity Pond
- The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mullan J, Metusela C, Guppy M, Pond D, Ivers R, Hoffman R, Rhee J, Hespe CM, Davis A, Barnett S, Bonney A. Development of a COVID-19 virtual community of practice in New South Wales: A qualitative study. Aust J Gen Pract 2022; 51:263-269. [PMID: 35362011 DOI: 10.31128/ajgp-03-21-5881] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES In April 2020, a group of general practice leaders in NSW, Australia, established a COVID-19 virtual community of practice (VCoP) to facilitate rapid transfer and implementation of clinical guidance into practice. This research aimed to gain an understanding of the experience and effectiveness of the VCoP from leaders and members. METHOD The study used a qualitative participatory action research methodology. A framework analysis was applied to focus group discussion, semi-structured interview and open-text written response data. RESULTS Thirty-six participants contributed data. In addition to a positive evaluation of the effectiveness of information transfer and support, a key finding was the importance of the role of the VCoP in professional advocacy. Areas for improvement included defining measures of success. DISCUSSION This study has reinforced the potential for VCoPs to aid health crisis responses. In future crisis applications, we recommend purposefully structuring advocacy and success measures at VCoP establishment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judy Mullan
- PhD, FSHPA, BA, BPharm, Academic Director, Centre for Health Research Illawarra Shoalhaven Population (CHRISP) and Deputy Director, Illawarra @ Southern Practice Research Network (ISPRN), School of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW
| | - Christine Metusela
- PhD, BA (Hons), Research Fellow, School of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW
| | - Michelle Guppy
- MBBS, FRACGP, MPH, Associate Professor of General Practice, School of Rural Medicine, University of New England, Armidale, NSW
| | - Dimity Pond
- BA, MBBS, FRACGP, PhD, Head, Discipline of General Practice, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Newcastle.
| | - Rowena Ivers
- MBBS, MPH, PhD, FRACGP, Academic Leader @ Community-Based Health Education and Chair of Phase 3, School of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW
| | - Rebekah Hoffman
- BSci (OT), MBBS, MPH, MSurg (Ortho), MSpMed, GDAAD, DCH, Academic Registrar, University of Wollongong, NSW; General Practice Registrar (GP Synergy), NSW.
| | - Joel Rhee
- BSc (Med), MBBS (Hons), GCULT, PhD, FRACGP, Associate Professor of General Practice, General Practice Academic Unit, School of Medicine, Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW; Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, Wollongong, NSW; General Practitioner, HammondCare Centre for Positive Ageing and Care, Hammondville, NSW
| | - Charlotte Mary Hespe
- FRACGP, MBBS (Hons), DCH (Lon), Associate Professor and Head of General Practice and Primary Care Research, School of Medicine Sydney, University of Notre Dame, Sydney, NSW; General Practitioner, Glebe Family Medical Practice, Glebe, NSW
| | - Anne Davis
- BSc (Hons), MBA, RACGP NSW @ ACT Faculty Manager, Sydney, NSW
| | - Stephen Barnett
- BMed, DCH, MRCGP, FRACGP, PhD, Clinical Associate Professor, School of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW
| | - Andrew Bonney
- MBBS, MFM (Clin), PhD, FRACGP, Roberta Williams Chair of General Practice, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW; Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, Wollongong, NSW
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Francisco MC, Lane H, Luckett T, Disalvo D, Pond D, Mitchell G, Chenoweth L, Phillips J, Beattie E, Luscombe G, Goodall S, Agar M. Facilitated case conferences on end-of-life care for persons with advanced dementia-a qualitative study of interactions between long-term care clinicians and family members. Age Ageing 2022; 51:6527373. [PMID: 35150583 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afab270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prognostic uncertainty and the need for proxy decision-making owing to cognitive impairment in advanced dementia, adds complexity to end-of-life care planning within the long-term care setting. Case conferences provide a structure to facilitate difficult conversations and an opportunity for family and clinicians to engage in prospective planning, and reach agreement on goals of end-of-life care. OBJECTIVE To explore interactions between multidisciplinary healthcare clinicians and families during facilitated case conferences on end-of-life care for residents with advanced dementia. METHODS A qualitative approach was used. Transcripts of audio-recorded case conferences facilitated by a trained registered nurse were coded by two independent researchers and analysed inductively. Transcripts were selected from an available pool until thematic saturation was reached. Emerging themes were confirmed with the wider research group. RESULTS Thematic saturation was reached after 25 transcripts. An overarching theme concerned the ways in which clinicians and families bridged medical and person-centred perspectives. Subthemes included: details of day-to-day care versus establishing overall goals of care; expression of emotion versus retreat from emotion; and missed opportunities versus expressed cues. Successful facilitation served to 'bridge the gap' between family and clinicians. CONCLUSION Facilitation of case conferences for residents with advanced dementia should focus on ensuring that: clinicians do not miss opportunities to discuss end-of-life care; discussions on the minutiae of care regularly return to the resident's broader goals of care; and information on dementia and treatments provided by clinicians is integrated with advice by family members regarding the resident's premorbid values and likely preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Heather Lane
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Rockingham General Hospital, Cooloongup, WA, Australia
- Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Tim Luckett
- Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation (IMPACCT), Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Domenica Disalvo
- Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation (IMPACCT), Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Dimity Pond
- School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Lynette Chenoweth
- Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing (CHeBA), University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jane Phillips
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Sydney, Australia
| | - Elizabeth Beattie
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Sydney, Australia
| | - Georgina Luscombe
- School of Rural Health (Dubbo/Orange), Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Stephen Goodall
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Meera Agar
- Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation (IMPACCT), Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- South West Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- Ingham Institute of Applied Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Gibson C, Goeman D, Hutchinson A, Yates M, Pond D. The provision of dementia care in general practice: practice nurse perceptions of their role. BMC Fam Pract 2021; 22:110. [PMID: 34107867 PMCID: PMC8191039 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-021-01467-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 05/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Background Primary care nurses can assist General Practitioner’s to identify cognition concerns and support patient health self-management for those experiencing cognitive impairment or dementia. This support may lead to more appropriate care and better health outcomes for this group. Consequently, there is a need to identify the role of the primary care nurse in dementia care provision, nurse perceptions of this role and to also understand the barriers and enablers that may influence any current or potential primary care nurse role in dementia care provision. Methods Eight focus groups were conducted with a total of 36 primary care nurses. Data was transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed. Results There was a high level of agreement between primary care nurses that they had a role in provision of dementia care. This role was largely attributed to the strong therapeutic relationship between nurses and patients. However, dementia care provision was not without its challenges, including a perceived lack of knowledge, limited resources and the hierarchical nature of general practice. Three main themes were identified: personal attributes of the primary care nurse; professional attributes of the primary care nurse role and the context of practice. Six sub-themes were identified: knowing the person; overcoming stigma; providing holistic care; knowing what to do; team culture and working in the system. Conclusions The findings of this study suggest primary care nurses have a role in dementia care provision and, there is a need to provide support for the nurse to deliver person-centred health care in the context of cognitive impairment. As the demand for good quality primary care for people living with dementia increases, the role of the primary care nurse should be considered in primary care policy discussions. The knowledge gained from this study could be useful in informing dementia training content, to provide better prompts in the health assessment and care planning templates used by primary care nurses to better identify the care needs of people with a cognitive impairment and to develop dementia care guidelines for primary care nurses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Gibson
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Dianne Goeman
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, Central Clinical School, University of Newcastle, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Alison Hutchinson
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Monash HealthCentre for Quality and Patient Safety ResearchInstitute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Mark Yates
- Deakin University School of Medicine, Ballarat Health Services, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Dimity Pond
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Gibson C, Goeman D, Yates MW, Pond D. Clinical practice guidelines and principles of care for people with dementia: a protocol for undertaking a Delphi technique to identify the recommendations relevant to primary care nurses in the delivery of person-centred dementia care. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e044843. [PMID: 33986053 PMCID: PMC8126272 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Nationally and internationally it is well recognised that dementia is poorly recognised and suboptimally managed in the primary care setting. There are multiple and complex reasons for this gap in care, including a lack of knowledge, high care demands and inadequate time for the general practitioner alone to manage dementia with its multiple physical, psychological and social dimensions. The primary care nurse potentially has a role in assisting the general practitioner in the provision of evidence-based dementia care. Although dementia-care guidelines for general practitioners exist, evidence on resources to support the primary care nurse in dementia care provision is scarce. The 'Australian Clinical Practice Guidelines and Principles of Care for People with Dementia' provides 109 recommendations for the diagnosis and management of dementia. This protocol describes a Delphi study to identify which of the 109 recommendations contained in these multidisciplinary guidelines are relevant to the primary care nurse in the delivery of person-centred dementia care in the general practice setting. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Using a Delphi consensus online survey, an expert panel will grade each of the recommendations written in the 'Clinical Practice Guidelines and Principles of Care for People with Dementia' as high-to-low relevance with respect to the role of the primary care nurse in general practice. To optimise reliability of results, quality indicators will be used in the data collection and reporting of the study. Invited panel members will include Australian primary care nurses working in general practice, primary care nursing researchers and representatives of the Australian Primary Health Care Nurses Association, the peak professional body for nurses working in primary healthcare. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study has been approved by The University of Newcastle Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) (H-2019-0029).Findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at scientific conferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Gibson
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Dianne Goeman
- Department of Public Health and Medicine, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mark William Yates
- Geriatric Medicine, Ballarat Health Service, Ballarat, Victoria, Australia
- Ballarat Clinical School, Deakin University, Ballarat, Victoria, Australia
| | - Dimity Pond
- General Practice, University of Newcastle Australia, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Zheng L, Godbee K, Steiner GZ, Daylight G, Ee C, Hill TY, Hohenberg MI, Lautenschlager NT, McDonald K, Pond D, Radford K, Anstey KJ, Peters R. Dementia risk reduction in practice: the knowledge, opinions and perspectives of Australian healthcare providers. Aust J Prim Health 2021; 27:136-142. [PMID: 33567248 DOI: 10.1071/py20189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2020] [Accepted: 11/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
This study examined Australian primary healthcare providers' knowledge about dementia risk factors and risk reduction and their perspectives on barriers and enablers to risk reduction in practice. Primary healthcare providers were recruited through Primary Health Networks across Australia (n =51). Participants completed an online survey that consisted of fixed-responses and free-text components to assess their knowledge, attitudes and current practices relating to dementia risk factors and risk reduction techniques. The results showed that Australian primary healthcare providers have good knowledge about the modifiable risk factors for dementia; however, face several barriers to working with patients to reduce dementia risk. Commonly reported barriers included low patient motivation and healthcare system level limitations. The most commonly reported recommendations to helping primary healthcare providers to work with patients to reduce dementia risk included increasing resources and improving dementia awareness and messaging. While the results need to be interpreted in the context of the limitations of this study, we conclude that collaborative efforts between researchers, clinicians, policy makers and the media are needed to support the uptake of risk reduction activities in primary care settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lidan Zheng
- UNSW Psychology, Sydney, NSW, Australia; and Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, NSW, Australia; and UNSW Ageing Futures Institute, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia; and Corresponding author
| | - Kali Godbee
- Department of General Practice, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic., Australia
| | - Genevieve Z Steiner
- NICM Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia
| | - Gail Daylight
- Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, NSW, Australia
| | - Carolyn Ee
- NICM Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia
| | - Thi Yen Hill
- Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, NSW, Australia; and Department of Aged Care, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia
| | - Mark I Hohenberg
- School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Nicola T Lautenschlager
- Academic Unit for Psychiatry of Old Age, Department of Psychiatry, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic., Australia; and NorthWestern Mental Health, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | - Keith McDonald
- South Western Sydney PHN (SWSPHN), Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Dimity Pond
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Kylie Radford
- UNSW Psychology, Sydney, NSW, Australia; and Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, NSW, Australia; and UNSW Ageing Futures Institute, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kaarin J Anstey
- UNSW Psychology, Sydney, NSW, Australia; and Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, NSW, Australia; and UNSW Ageing Futures Institute, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Ruth Peters
- UNSW Psychology, Sydney, NSW, Australia; and Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, NSW, Australia; and UNSW Ageing Futures Institute, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Pond D, Higgins I, Mate K, Merl H, Mills D, McNeil K. Mobile memory clinic: implementing a nurse practitioner-led, collaborative dementia model of care within general practice. Aust J Prim Health 2021; 27:6-12. [PMID: 33517974 DOI: 10.1071/py20118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2020] [Accepted: 10/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
The limited capacity of secondary health services to address the increasing prevalence of dementia within the community draws attention to the need for an enhanced role for nurses working collaboratively with GPs in diagnosing and coordinating post-diagnostic care for patients with dementia. This study investigated the feasibility and acceptability of a nurse practitioner-led mobile memory clinic that was embedded within general practice and targeted to caring for patients and their carers in areas of socioeconomic disadvantage with poor access to specialist health services. Over the period from mid-2013 to mid-2014, 40 GPs referred 102 patients, with the nurse practitioner conducting assessments with 77 of these patients in their homes. Overall, there was a strong interest in this model of care by general practice staff, with the assessment and care provided by the nurse practitioner evaluated as highly acceptable by both patients and their carers. Nonetheless, there are financial and structural impediments to this model of care being implemented within the current Australian health service framework, necessitating further research investigating its cost-effectiveness and efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimity Pond
- School of Medicine and Public Health, Office 134, The Building and Investment Centre of Excellence, University of Newcastle, 10 Chittaway Road, Ourimbah, NSW 2258, Australia; and Corresponding author.
| | - Isabel Higgins
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, RW227, Richardson Wing, University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
| | - Karen Mate
- School of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, LS350, Life Sciences Building, University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
| | - Helga Merl
- Hunter New England Local Health District and Hunter Medicare Local. Present address: Wicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, Room B128, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 143, Hobart, Tas. 7001, Australia
| | - Dianne Mills
- Aged Care and Rehabilitation Services (LMNCS), Hunter New England Health District, Building 2, Level 1, 26 York Street, Taree, NSW 2430, Australia
| | - Karen McNeil
- School of Medicine and Public Health, Office 134, The Building and Investment Centre of Excellence, University of Newcastle, 10 Chittaway Road, Ourimbah, NSW 2258, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kable A, Hullick C, Palazzi K, Oldmeadow C, Searles A, Ling R, Pond D, Fullerton A, Fraser S, Bruce R, Murdoch W, Attia J. Evaluation of a safe medication strategy intervention for people with dementia with an unplanned admission: Results from the Safe Medication Strategy Dementia Study. Australas J Ageing 2020; 40:356-365. [PMID: 33166034 DOI: 10.1111/ajag.12877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2020] [Revised: 08/24/2020] [Accepted: 10/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether a safe medication strategy compared with usual care, provided to people with dementia during an unplanned admission, reduces readmissions to hospital and re-presentation to emergency departments within three months. METHODS A prospective, controlled pre-/post-trial conducted at two regional hospitals in New South Wales, Australia. RESULTS No treatment effect was seen for time to first re-presentation or readmission within three months (P = .3). Compliance with six strategies applicable for all participants in the intervention phase was 58%. There was no treatment effect for secondary outcomes including dose administration aid use, home medicines review (HMR) requests by general practitioners and completed HMRs; however, they were significantly higher at the intervention site in both phases. CONCLUSION A bundle of care to improve medication safety in people with dementia did not reduce re-presentations or readmissions within three months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley Kable
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Carolyn Hullick
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.,Hunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kerrin Palazzi
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Andrew Searles
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rod Ling
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Dimity Pond
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Anne Fullerton
- Hunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Samantha Fraser
- Hunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Remia Bruce
- Hunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Wendy Murdoch
- Hunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - John Attia
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Chong TW, Curran E, Ellis KA, Southam J, You E, Cox KL, Hill KD, Pond D, Dow B, Anstey KJ, Hosking D, Cyarto E, Lautenschlager NT. Physical activity for older Australians with mild cognitive impairment or subjective cognitive decline – A narrative review to support guideline development. J Sci Med Sport 2020; 23:913-920. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2020.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2019] [Revised: 02/12/2020] [Accepted: 03/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
23
|
Gibson C, Goeman D, Pond D. What is the role of the practice nurse in the care of people living with dementia, or cognitive impairment, and their support person(s)?: a systematic review. BMC Fam Pract 2020; 21:141. [PMID: 32660419 PMCID: PMC7359614 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-020-01177-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2019] [Accepted: 05/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Background The potential value of expanding the Practice Nurse role to include the recognition and management of dementia has been acknowledged. Practice Nurses are well-positioned to provide comprehensive dementia information and support so that people living with dementia are better equipped to self-manage their health and live well with dementia. The purpose of this review was to systematically examine published literature to identify existing and potential roles of Practice Nurse’s in the delivery of care to people affected by dementia and to describe the characteristics and effectiveness of nurse interventions in dementia models of care. Methods The PRISMA statement guided the systematic review of the quantitative and qualitative evidence for roles and characteristics of the Practice Nurse in the delivery of dementia care. A comprehensive literature search of seven electronic databases and Google scholar identified relevant original research published in English between January 2000 and January 2019. Thirteen articles met the inclusion criteria and were extracted into the Covidence software for analysis. Results The heterogeneity of the included studies purpose, design and outcomes measures and the diversity in health systems and primary care nurses scope of practice made it difficult to synthesise the findings and draw conclusions. The heterogeneity did, however, provide important insights into the characteristics of roles undertaken by nurses working in the general practice setting, which were potentially beneficial to people living with dementia and their support person. These included patient accessibility to the Practice Nurse, early recognition and management of cognitive changes, care management and collaboration with the General Practitioner. Limitations of the provision of dementia care by Practice Nurses included a lack of definition of the role, inadequate dementia specific training, time constraints and poor communication with General Practitioners. Conclusions Embedding an evidence-based model that describes the role of the Practice Nurse in dementia care provision has the potential to increase early recognition of cognitive impairment and more appropriate primary care management of dementia. Systematic review registration PROSPERO 2018 CRD42018088191.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Gibson
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.
| | - Dianne Goeman
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.,Central Clinical School, Monash University; Kolling Institute, the University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Dimity Pond
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Teng C, Loy CT, Sellars M, Pond D, Latt MD, Waite LM, Sinka V, Logeman C, Tong A. Making Decisions About Long-Term Institutional Care Placement Among People With Dementia and Their Caregivers: Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies. Gerontologist 2020; 60:e329-e346. [PMID: 31141133 DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnz046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2018] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES People with dementia become increasingly dependent on others for care as cognition declines. Decision making about placement of people with dementia into long-term institutional care can be emotionally complex. The objective of this review is to describe experiences and perspectives of people with dementia and their family caregivers in making decisions about institutional care placement. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL were searched from inception to August 2018. Thematic synthesis was used to analyze results. RESULTS We included 42 studies involving 123 people with dementia and 705 family caregivers from 12 countries. We identified five themes: ensuring safety (avoiding injury due to frailty, protecting against dangerous behaviors, preventing aggressive encounters), reaching breaking point (insufferable burden of caregiving, needs exceeding capabilities, intensifying family conflict, loneliness and isolation, straining under additional responsibilities, making extreme personal sacrifices), vulnerability in lacking support (ill-prepared for crisis, unable to access professional expertise, unpredictable prognostic trajectory, uncertainty navigating health care services, pressured by limited placement opportunities, high cost of placement, resenting loss of autonomy), avoiding guilt of abandonment (sharing accountability, mitigating against disagreement and stigma, reluctance to relinquish caregiving, seeking approval), and seeking reassurance and validation (preserving personhood and former identity, empowerment through engagement, assurance of care quality, acceptance from other care residents). DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS People with dementia and family caregivers feel vulnerable, disempowered, and guilty in decision making about institutionalization. Person-centered communication and support strategies that foster confidence and reassurance are needed to assist people with dementia and caregivers to make decisions about placement into long-term institutional care settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claris Teng
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Clement T Loy
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Marcus Sellars
- Advance Care Planning Australia, Austin Health, Melbourne.,Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Dimity Pond
- School of Medicine and Public Health (General Practice), University of Newcastle, Australia
| | - Mark D Latt
- Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Louise M Waite
- Centre for Education and Research on Ageing, Concord Hospital, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Victoria Sinka
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Charlotte Logeman
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Allison Tong
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Luckett T, Luscombe G, Phillips J, Beattie E, Chenoweth L, Davidson PM, Goodall S, Pond D, Mitchell G, Agar M. Australian long-term care personnel's knowledge and attitudes regarding palliative care for people with advanced dementia. Dementia (London) 2019; 20:427-443. [PMID: 31707844 DOI: 10.1177/1471301219886768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
This study aimed to describe Australian long-term care (LTC) personnel's knowledge and attitudes concerning palliative care for residents with advanced dementia, and explore relationships with LTC facility/personnel characteristics. An analysis was undertaken of baseline data from a cluster randomised controlled trial of facilitated family case conferencing for improving palliative care of LTC residents with advanced dementia (the 'IDEAL Study'). Participants included any LTC personnel directly involved in residents' care. Knowledge and attitudes concerning palliative care for people with advanced dementia were measured using the questionnaire on Palliative Care for Advanced Dementia. Univariate and multivariate analyses explored relationships between personnel knowledge/attitudes and facility/personnel characteristics. Of 307 personnel in the IDEAL Study, 290 (94.5%) from 19/20 LTCFs provided sufficient data for inclusion. Participants included 9 (2.8%) nurse managers, 59 (20.5%) registered nurses, 25 (8.7%) enrolled nurses, 187 (64.9%) assistants in nursing/personal care assistants and 9 (3.1%) care service employees. In multivariate analyses, a facility policy not to rotate personnel through dementia units was the only variable associated with more favourable overall personnel knowledge and attitudes. Other variables associated with favourable knowledge were a designation of nursing manager or registered or enrolled nurse, and having a preferred language of English. Other variables associated with favourable attitudes were tertiary level of education and greater experience in dementia care. Like previous international research, this study found Australian LTC personnel knowledge and attitudes regarding palliative care for people with advanced dementia to be associated with both facility and personnel characteristics. Future longitudinal research is needed to better understand the relationships between knowledge and attitudes, as well as between these attributes and quality of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Luckett
- Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation (IMPACCT), Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, Australia
| | - Georgina Luscombe
- School of Rural Health, The University of Sydney, Orange/Dubbo, Australia
| | - Jane Phillips
- Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation (IMPACCT), Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, Australia
| | - Elizabeth Beattie
- School of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Herston, Australia
| | - Lynnette Chenoweth
- Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing, University of New South Wales, Randwick, Australia
| | - Patricia M Davidson
- Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation (IMPACCT), Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, Australia; School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Stephen Goodall
- Centre for Health Research and Evaluation (CHERE), Faculty of Business, University of Technology Sydney, Haymarket, Australia
| | - Dimity Pond
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia
| | - Geoffrey Mitchell
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia
| | - Meera Agar
- Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation (IMPACCT), Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, Australia; South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Liverpool, Australia; Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Teng C, Loy C, Sellars M, Pond D, Latt M, Waite LM, Logeman C, Sinka V, Tong A. P3-512: MAKING DECISIONS ABOUT LONG-TERM INSTITUTIONAL CARE PLACEMENT AMONG PEOPLE WITH DEMENTIA AND THEIR CAREGIVERS: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF QUALITATIVE STUDIES. Alzheimers Dement 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2019.06.3548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Claris Teng
- Sydney School of Public Health; The University of Sydney; Sydney NSW Australia
| | - Clement Loy
- Sydney School of Public Health; The University of Sydney; Sydney NSW Australia
| | - Marcus Sellars
- Advance Care Planning Australia; Melbourne VIC Australia
- Sydney Medical School; University of Sydney; Sydney NSW Australia
| | - Dimity Pond
- The University of Newcastle; Newcastle Australia
| | - Mark Latt
- Sydney Medical School; University of Sydney; Sydney NSW Australia
| | - Louise M. Waite
- Centre for Education and Research on Ageing, Concord Hospital; The University of Sydney; Sydney Australia
| | - Charlotte Logeman
- Sydney School of Public Health; The University of Sydney; Sydney NSW Australia
| | - Victoria Sinka
- Sydney School of Public Health; The University of Sydney; Sydney NSW Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research; The Children's Hospital at Westmead; Westmead NSW Australia
| | - Allison Tong
- Sydney School of Public Health; The University of Sydney; Sydney NSW Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research; The Children's Hospital at Westmead; Westmead NSW Australia
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Sellars M, Chung O, Nolte L, Tong A, Pond D, Fetherstonhaugh D, McInerney F, Sinclair C, Detering KM. Perspectives of people with dementia and carers on advance care planning and end-of-life care: A systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. Palliat Med 2019; 33:274-290. [PMID: 30404576 PMCID: PMC6376607 DOI: 10.1177/0269216318809571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Advance care planning aims to ensure that care received during serious and chronic illness is consistent with the person’s values, preferences and goals. However, less than 40% of people with dementia undertake advance care planning internationally. AIM: This study aims to describe the perspectives of people with dementia and their carers on advance care planning and end-of-life care. DESIGN: Systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. DATA SOURCES: Electronic databases were searched from inception to July 2018. RESULTS: From 84 studies involving 389 people with dementia and 1864 carers, five themes were identified: avoiding dehumanising treatment and care (remaining connected, delaying institutionalisation, rejecting the burdens of futile treatment); confronting emotionally difficult conversations (signifying death, unpreparedness to face impending cognitive decline, locked into a pathway); navigating existential tensions (accepting inevitable incapacity and death, fear of being responsible for cause of death, alleviating decisional responsibility); defining personal autonomy (struggling with unknown preferences, depending on carer advocacy, justifying treatments for health deteriorations); and lacking confidence in healthcare settings (distrusting clinicians’ mastery and knowledge, making uninformed choices, deprived of hospice access and support at end of life). CONCLUSION: People with dementia and their carers felt uncertain in making treatment decisions in the context of advance care planning and end-of-life care. Advance care planning strategies that attend to people’s uncertainty in decision-making may help to empower people with dementia and carers and strengthen person-centred care in this context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcus Sellars
- 1 Advance Care Planning Australia, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,2 Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Olivia Chung
- 1 Advance Care Planning Australia, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Linda Nolte
- 1 Advance Care Planning Australia, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Allison Tong
- 3 Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Dimity Pond
- 4 School of Medicine and Public Health (General Practice), The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - Deirdre Fetherstonhaugh
- 5 Australian Centre for Evidence Based Aged Care, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Fran McInerney
- 6 Wicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia
| | - Craig Sinclair
- 7 Rural Clinical School of Western Australia, University of Western Australia, Albany, WA, Australia
| | - Karen M Detering
- 1 Advance Care Planning Australia, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,8 Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Science, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Thomas R, Sims R, Beller E, Scott AM, Doust J, Le Couteur D, Pond D, Loy C, Forlini C, Glasziou P. An Australian community jury to consider case-finding for dementia: Differences between informed community preferences and general practice guidelines. Health Expect 2019; 22:475-484. [PMID: 30714290 PMCID: PMC6543153 DOI: 10.1111/hex.12871] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2018] [Revised: 01/06/2019] [Accepted: 01/08/2019] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Case‐finding for dementia is practised by general practitioners (GPs) in Australia but without an awareness of community preferences. We explored the values and preferences of informed community members around case‐finding for dementia in Australian general practice. Design, setting and participants A before and after, mixed‐methods study in Gold Coast, Australia, with ten community members aged 50‐70. Intervention A 2‐day citizen/community jury. Participants were informed by experts about dementia, the potential harms and benefits of case‐finding, and ethical considerations. Primary and secondary outcomes We asked participants, “Should the health system encourage GPs to practice ‘case‐finding’ of dementia in people older than 50?” Case‐finding was defined as a GP initiating testing for dementia when the patient is unaware of symptoms. We also assessed changes in participant comprehension/knowledge, attitudes towards dementia and participants’ own intentions to undergo case‐finding for dementia if it were suggested. Results Participants voted unanimously against case‐finding for dementia, citing a lack of effective treatments, potential for harm to patients and potential financial incentives. However, they recognized that case‐finding was currently practised by Australian GPs and recommended specific changes to the guidelines. Participants increased their comprehension/knowledge of dementia, their attitude towards case‐finding became less positive, and their intentions to be tested themselves decreased. Conclusion Once informed, community jury participants did not agree case‐finding for dementia should be conducted by GPs. Yet their personal intentions to accept case‐finding varied. If case‐finding for dementia is recommended in the guidelines, then shared decision making is essential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rae Thomas
- Centre for Research in Evidence-Based Practice, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Rebecca Sims
- Centre for Research in Evidence-Based Practice, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Elaine Beller
- Centre for Research in Evidence-Based Practice, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Anna Mae Scott
- Centre for Research in Evidence-Based Practice, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Jenny Doust
- Centre for Research in Evidence-Based Practice, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - David Le Couteur
- Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Dimity Pond
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Clement Loy
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,The Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Cynthia Forlini
- Sydney Health Ethics, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Paul Glasziou
- Centre for Research in Evidence-Based Practice, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Kable A, Baker A, Pond D, Southgate E, Turner A, Levi C. Health professionals’ perspectives on the discharge process and continuity of care for stroke survivors discharged home in regional Australia: A qualitative, descriptive study. Nurs Health Sci 2018; 21:253-261. [DOI: 10.1111/nhs.12590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2018] [Revised: 11/15/2018] [Accepted: 11/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley Kable
- School of Nursing and Midwifery; University of Newcastle; Newcastle New South Wales Australia
| | - Amanda Baker
- School of Medicine and Public Health; University of Newcastle; Newcastle New South Wales Australia
| | - Dimity Pond
- School of Medicine and Public Health; University of Newcastle; Newcastle New South Wales Australia
| | - Erica Southgate
- School of Education; University of Newcastle; Newcastle New South Wales Australia
| | - Alyna Turner
- School of Medicine and Public Health; University of Newcastle; Newcastle New South Wales Australia
| | - Christopher Levi
- School of Medicine and Public Health; University of Newcastle; Newcastle New South Wales Australia
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dementia is an increasingly prevalent condition, currently affecting over 400,000 Australians, and this is expected to rise to over one million by 2056. Diagnosis of dementia is a clinical one, as there is no single well-defined blood test, imaging or cognitive function test that validly diagnoses dementia. There are also many causes of cognitive impairment other than dementia, which need to be identified or excluded. General practitioners (GPs) are on the frontline of presentation and will therefore play an increasingly important role in identification and management. OBJECTIVE This article reviews what the GP can do in relation to office-based assessment for cognitive impairment. DISCUSSION Dementia is an increasingly common condition, and it is important that GPs become familiar with its assessment and management in order to optimise access to care services, advance care planning and management of other conditions for their patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimity Pond
- BA, MBBS, FRACGP, PhD, Head, Discipline of General Practice, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Newcastle.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Pond D, Mate K, Stocks N, Gunn J, Disler P, Magin P, Marley J, Paterson N, Horton G, Goode S, Weaver N, Brodaty H. Effectiveness of a peer-mediated educational intervention in improving general practitioner diagnostic assessment and management of dementia: a cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e021125. [PMID: 30121596 PMCID: PMC6104761 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Test effectiveness of an educational intervention for general practitioners (GPs) on quality of life and depression outcomes for patients. DESIGN Double-blind, cluster randomised controlled trial. SETTING General practices in Australia between 2007 and 2010. PARTICIPANTS General practices were randomly allocated to the waitlist (n=37) or intervention (n=66) group, in a ratio of 1:2. A total of 2030 (1478 intervention; 552 waitlist) community-dwelling participants aged 75 years or older were recruited via 168 GPs (113 intervention; 55 waitlist). INTERVENTIONS A practice-based academic detailing intervention led by a peer educator that included: (1) training in use of the GP assessment of cognition dementia screening instrument; (2) training in diagnosis and management based on Royal Australian College of General Practitioners Dementia Guidelines; (3) addressing GPs' barriers to dementia diagnosis; and (4) a business case outlining a cost-effective dementia assessment approach. OUTCOME MEASURES Primary outcome measures were patient quality of life and depression; secondary outcome measures were: (1) sensitivity and specificity of GP identification of dementia; (2) referral to medical specialists and/or support services; (3) patient satisfaction with care; and (4) carer quality of life, depression and satisfaction with care. RESULTS The educational intervention had no significant effect on patient quality of life or depression scores after 12 months. There were however improvements in secondary outcome measures including sensitivity of GP judgement of dementia (p=0.002; OR 6.0, 95% CI 1.92 to 18.73), satisfaction with GP communication for all patients (p=0.024; mean difference 2.1, 95% CI 0.27 to 3.93) and for patients with dementia (p=0.007; mean difference 7.44, 95% CI 2.02 to 12.86) and enablement of carers (p=0.0185; mean difference 24.77, 95% CI 4.15 to 45.40). CONCLUSION Practice-based academic detailing did not improve patient quality of life or depression scores but did improve detection of dementia in primary care and patient satisfaction with GP communication. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ACTRN12607000117415; Pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimity Pond
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Karen Mate
- School of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nigel Stocks
- Discipline of General Practice, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Jane Gunn
- Department of General Practice, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Peter Disler
- School of Rural Health, Monash University, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia
| | - Parker Magin
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| | - John Marley
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nerida Paterson
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Graeme Horton
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Susan Goode
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Natasha Weaver
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Henry Brodaty
- Dementia Centre for Research Collaboration and the Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing, School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Disalvo D, Luckett T, Luscombe G, Bennett A, Davidson P, Chenoweth L, Mitchell G, Pond D, Phillips J, Beattie E, Goodall S, Agar M. Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing in Australian Nursing Home Residents with Advanced Dementia: A Substudy of the IDEAL Study. J Palliat Med 2018; 21:1472-1479. [PMID: 30106321 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prescribing medications for nursing home residents with advanced dementia should focus on optimizing function and comfort, reducing unnecessary harms and aligning care goals with a palliative approach. OBJECTIVE The aim of the study was to estimate the proportion of Australian nursing home residents with advanced dementia receiving potentially inappropriate medications, and identify those most commonly prescribed and factors associated with their use. DESIGN Data were collected through retrospective audit of medication charts. SETTING/SUBJECTS Two hundred eighteen nursing home residents with advanced dementia from 20 nursing homes participated in a cluster-randomized controlled trial of case conferencing (the IDEAL Study) from June 2013 to December 2014. MEASUREMENTS Inappropriate drug use was defined as medications classified as "never appropriate" by the Palliative Excellence in Alzheimer Care Efforts (PEACE) program criteria. Generalized linear mixed models were used to identify variables predicting use of "never" appropriate medications. RESULTS Over a quarter (n = 65, 30%) of residents received at least one medication classed as "never" appropriate, the most common being lipid-lowering agents (n = 38, 17.4%), antiplatelet agents (n = 18, 8.3%), and acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (n = 16, 7.3%). Residents who had been at the nursing home for ≤10 months (odds ratio [OR] 5.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.74-18.06) and 11-21 months (OR 5.41, 95% CI 1.67-17.75) had significantly greater odds of receiving a never appropriate medication compared with residents who had been at the nursing home for >5 years. CONCLUSIONS Use of potentially inappropriate medications in Australian nursing home residents with advanced dementia is common. A greater understanding of the rationale that underpins prescribing of medications is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Domenica Disalvo
- 1 Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation (IMPACCT), Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney , Ultimo, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Tim Luckett
- 1 Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation (IMPACCT), Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney , Ultimo, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Georgina Luscombe
- 2 Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney , Ultimo, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alexandra Bennett
- 3 NSW Therapeutic Advisory Group , Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Lynnette Chenoweth
- 5 Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing, University of New South Wales , Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Geoffrey Mitchell
- 6 Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland , St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia
| | - Dimity Pond
- 7 School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle , Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jane Phillips
- 1 Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation (IMPACCT), Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney , Ultimo, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Elizabeth Beattie
- 8 School of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology , Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Stephen Goodall
- 9 Centre for Health Research and Evaluation (CHERE), Faculty of Business, University of Technology , Haymarket, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Meera Agar
- 1 Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation (IMPACCT), Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney , Ultimo, New South Wales, Australia .,10 South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales , Sydney, New South Wales, Australia .,11 Ingham Institute of Applied Medical Research , Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Anstey KJ, Kim S, McMaster M, Sargent-Cox K, Lautenschlager NT, Torres S, Pond D, Cherbuin N. P1‐651: DEMENTIA RISK REDUCTION IN PRIMARY CARE: RESEARCH DESIGN, PROGRESS AND CHALLENGES. Alzheimers Dement 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.06.663] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sarang Kim
- Australian National UniversityCanberraAustralia
| | | | | | | | - Susan Torres
- School of Exercise and Nutrition ScienceDeakin UniversityMelbourneAustralia
| | - Dimity Pond
- The University of NewcastleNewcastleAustralia
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Aghajafari F, Pond D, Catzikiris N, Cameron I. Quality assessment of systematic reviews of vitamin D, cognition and dementia. BJPsych Open 2018; 4:238-249. [PMID: 29998819 PMCID: PMC6060489 DOI: 10.1192/bjo.2018.32] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2017] [Revised: 05/03/2018] [Accepted: 05/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is conflicting evidence regarding the association of vitamin D with cognition performance and dementia.AimsWe aimed to summarise the evidence on the association of vitamin D with cognitive performance, dementia and Alzheimer disease through a qualitative assessment of available systematic reviews and meta-analyses. METHOD We conducted an overview of the systematic reviews of all study types with or without meta-analyses on vitamin D and either Alzheimer disease, dementia or cognitive performance up to June 2017. RESULTS Eleven systematic reviews were identified, nine of which were meta-analyses with substantial heterogeneity, differing statistical methods, variable methodological quality and quality of data abstraction. A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews checklist scores ranged from 4 to 10 out of 11, with seven reviews of 'moderate' and four of 'high' methodological quality. Out of six meta-analyses on the association between low serum concentration of 25-hydroxyvitamin D and risk of dementia, five showed a positive association. Results of meta-analyses on the association between low serum concentration of 25-hydroxyvitamin D and memory function tests showed conflicting results. CONCLUSIONS This systematic evaluation of available systematic reviews provided a clearer understanding of the potential link between low serum vitamin D concentrations and dementia. This evaluation also showed that the quality of the available evidence is not optimal because of both the low methodological quality of the reviews and low quality of the original studies. Interpretation of these systematic reviews should therefore be made with care.Declaration of interestNone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fariba Aghajafari
- Assistant Professor, Department of Family Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary Sunridge Family Medicine Teaching Centre, Canada
| | - Dimity Pond
- Professor and Head of Department of Family Medicine, University of Newcastle, Australia
| | - Nigel Catzikiris
- Research Assistant, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Newcastle, Australia
| | - Ian Cameron
- Professor, Northern Clinical School, Rehabilitation Studies Unit, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Page AT, Cross AJ, Elliott RA, Pond D, Dooley M, Beanland C, Etherton-Beer CD. Integrate healthcare to provide multidisciplinary consumer-centred medication management: report from a working group formed from the National Stakeholders’ Meeting for the Quality Use of Medicines to Optimise Ageing in Older Australians. J Pharm Pract Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1002/jppr.1434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Amy T. Page
- Western Australia Centre for Health and Ageing; University of Western Australia; Crawley Australia
| | - Amanda J. Cross
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety; Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences; Monash University; Melbourne Australia
| | - Rohan A. Elliott
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety; Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences; Monash University; Melbourne Australia
- Pharmacy Department; Austin Health; Melbourne Australia
| | - Dimity Pond
- University of Newcastle; Newcastle Australia
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Dickins M, Goeman D, O'Keefe F, Iliffe S, Pond D. Understanding the conceptualisation of risk in the context of community dementia care. Soc Sci Med 2018; 208:72-79. [PMID: 29772396 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.05.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2017] [Revised: 05/02/2018] [Accepted: 05/06/2018] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
Risk has become a ubiquitous presence in modern society. For individuals diagnosed with dementia this preoccupation with risk can affect their day-to-day life in many ways. Maintaining autonomy while balancing risks is a continual struggle not only for those living with the disease, but also their carers, family and health professionals. To understand how these different groups of individuals conceptualise the issue of risk for those living with dementia, 83 semi-structured interviews were conducted with people living with dementia, carers, older people without significant experience of dementia, and registered nurses, and staff from a community nursing organisation. These interviews were analysed using Thematic Analysis, which suggested that the risks identified by each group were grounded in their experiences and perspective on dementia. Furthermore, context and understanding of the individual living with dementia and their preferences was central to effectively managing risk in a balanced way, ensuring that 'acceptable risks' were taken to ensure an acceptable quality of life for all involved. These findings highlight that there is no single approach to risk which can be applied to all individuals; rather, a negotiation needs to take place that takes into account the individual's preferences alongside their available resources and means.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dianne Goeman
- Bolton Clarke Research Institute, Bolton Clarke, Australia
| | | | - Steve Iliffe
- Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, UK
| | - Dimity Pond
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Pond D, McBride A, Davids L, Reddy B, Limbert G. Microstructurally-based constitutive modelling of the skin – Linking intrinsic ageing to microstructural parameters. J Theor Biol 2018; 444:108-123. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2018.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2017] [Revised: 12/21/2017] [Accepted: 01/15/2018] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
38
|
Kim S, McMaster M, Torres S, Cox KL, Lautenschlager N, Rebok GW, Pond D, D’Este C, McRae I, Cherbuin N, Anstey KJ. Protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial of Body Brain Life-General Practice and a Lifestyle Modification Programme to decrease dementia risk exposure in a primary care setting. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e019329. [PMID: 29550779 PMCID: PMC5875671 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION It has been estimated that a 10%-25% reduction in seven key risk factors could potentially prevent 1.1-3.0 million Alzheimer's disease cases globally. In addition, as dementia is preceded by more subtle cognitive deficits which have substantial social and economic impact, effective preventative interventions would likely have more extensive benefits. The current study evaluates in primary care a multidomain risk-reduction intervention targeting adults with high risk of developing dementia. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A randomised controlled trial (RCT) is being conducted to evaluate three intervention programmes using a pragmatic approach suitable to the clinic: (1) a 12-week online and face-to-face dementia risk-reduction intervention (Body Brain Life-General Practice (BBL-GP)); (2) a 6-week face-to-face group lifestyle modification programme (LMP); and (3) a 12-week email-only programme providing general health information. We aim to recruit 240 participants, aged 18 and over, to undergo a comprehensive cognitive and physical assessment at baseline and follow-ups (postintervention, 18, 36 and 62 weeks). The primary outcome is dementia risk measured with the modified version of the Australian National University-Alzheimer's Disease Risk Index Short Form. Secondary outcomes are cognitive function measured with Trails A and B, and the Digit Symbol Modalities Test; physical activity with moderate-vigorous physical activity and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire; depression with the Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression; cost evaluation with the 12-item Short Form Health Survey, Framingham Coronary Heart Disease Risk Score and Australian Type 2 Diabetes Risk Assessment Tool; diet quality with the Australian Recommended Food Score; and sleep quality with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This RCT is a novel pragmatic intervention applied in a primary care setting to reduce the dementia risk exposure in adults at high risk. If successful, BBL-GP and LMP will provide a versatile, evidence-based package that can be easily and quickly rolled out to other primary care settings and which can be scaled up at relatively low cost compared with other strategies involving intensive interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ACTRN12616000868482.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarang Kim
- Centre for Research on Ageing, Health and Wellbeing, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Mitchell McMaster
- Centre for Research on Ageing, Health and Wellbeing, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Susan Torres
- School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kay L Cox
- Medical School, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Nicola Lautenschlager
- Academic Unit for Psychiatry of Old Age, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - George W Rebok
- Johns Hopkins Center on Aging and Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Dimity Pond
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Catherine D’Este
- National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health (NCEPH), Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Ian McRae
- Centre for Research on Ageing, Health and Wellbeing, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Nicolas Cherbuin
- Centre for Research on Ageing, Health and Wellbeing, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Kaarin J Anstey
- Centre for Research on Ageing, Health and Wellbeing, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
- School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Bohatko-Naismith J, Guest M, James C, Pond D, Rivett DA. Australian general practitioners' perspective on the role of the workplace Return-to-Work Coordinator. Aust J Prim Health 2018; 24:502-509. [DOI: 10.1071/py17084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2017] [Accepted: 06/17/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
General practitioners (GPs) play a key role in the return-to-work process, and yet their experiences working with workplace Return-to-Work Coordinators (RTWCs) have rarely been studied. The aim of this paper is to provide insights from the GP perspective about their experiences with workplace RTWCs and their preparedness for the role. GPs from Australian states and territories where legislation mandates workplaces employ a RTWC were requested to complete a questionnaire on their experiences with workplace RTWCs. Fifty GPs completed a questionnaire on the preparedness of RTWCs in relation to their role, with 58% (n=29) indicating RTWCs require more training. A total of 78% (n=39) of respondents considered RTWCs were important in assisting injured workers return to work, with 98% (n=49) ranking trustworthiness, respectfulness and ethicalness as the most important or an important trait for a RTWC to possess. Interestingly, 40% (n=20) of respondents themselves reported having no training in the return-to-work process. GPs acknowledge the importance of the workplace RTWC in the return-to-work process, and the results highlight the need for RTWCs to possess specific traits and undergo appropriate training for the facilitation of a successful return to work for injured workers.
Collapse
|
40
|
Goeman DP, Dickins M, Iliffe S, Pond D, O'Keefe F. Development of a discussion tool to enable well-being by providing choices for people with dementia: a qualitative study incorporating codesign and participatory action research. BMJ Open 2017; 7:e017672. [PMID: 29138202 PMCID: PMC5695371 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To codesign a discussion tool to facilitate negotiation of risk between health professionals, people with dementia and carers. METHODS A qualitative approach using codesign. Thematic analysis was used to analyse interviews and focus groups with people with dementia, carers, healthcare staff and healthy older people exploring the issue of risk in dementia, the acceptability and development of a discussion tool. RESULTS Sixty-one participants identified the breadth, depth and complexity of risk in dementia care and the need for individualised solutions. They also deemed a discussion tool to facilitate negotiation of risk was acceptable and responses informed the tool development. Twenty-two participants provided feedback that was used to refine the final version. CONCLUSION Our discussion tool enables choices for people with dementia by focusing on abilities rather than deficits and assists health professionals to deliver person-centred care. Flash cards prompt concerns and the tool provides a range of strategies to address these issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dianne Patricia Goeman
- RDNS Research Institute, Royal District Nursing Service, St Kilda, Victoria, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
- NHMRC Cognitive Decline Partnership Centre, Sydney Medical School, Northern, The University of Sydney, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
- Central Clinical School, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Marissa Dickins
- RDNS Research Institute, Royal District Nursing Service, St Kilda, Victoria, Australia
| | - Steve Iliffe
- Primary Care for Older People, University College London, London, UK
| | - Dimity Pond
- School of Medicine and Public Health (General Practice), The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Fleur O'Keefe
- RDNS Research Institute, Royal District Nursing Service, St Kilda, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Kable A, Pond D, Hullick C, Chenoweth L, Duggan A, Attia J, Oldmeadow C. An evaluation of discharge documentation for people with dementia discharged home from hospital – A cross-sectional pilot study. Dementia 2017; 18:1764-1776. [DOI: 10.1177/1471301217728845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
This study evaluated discharge documentation for people with dementia who were discharged home, against expected discharge criteria and determined relationships between compliance scores and outcomes. This cross-sectional study audited discharge documentation and conducted a post discharge survey of carers. There were 73 eligible discharges and clinically significant documentation deficits for people with dementia included: risk assessments of confusion (48%), falls and pressure injury (56%); provision of medication dose-decision aids (53%), provision of contact information for patient support groups (6%) and advance care planning (9%). There was no significant relationship between compliance scores and outcomes. Carer strain was reported to be high for many carers. People with dementia and their carers are more vulnerable and at higher risk of poor outcomes after discharge. There are opportunities for improved provision of medications and risk assessment for people with dementia, provision of information for patient support groups and advanced care planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley Kable
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia
| | - Dimity Pond
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia
| | - Carolyn Hullick
- Faculty of Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia; Hunter New England Local Health District, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Lynnette Chenoweth
- Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Anne Duggan
- Faculty of Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia; Hunter New England Local Health District, New South Wales, Australia
| | - John Attia
- Faculty of Health, University of Newcastle, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Christopher Oldmeadow
- Faculty of Health, University of Newcastle, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Kable A, Pond D, Baker A, Turner A, Levi C. Evaluation of discharge documentation after hospitalization for stroke patients discharged home in Australia: A cross-sectional, pilot study. Nurs Health Sci 2017; 20:24-30. [DOI: 10.1111/nhs.12368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2017] [Revised: 05/15/2017] [Accepted: 06/01/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley Kable
- Faculty of Health and Medicine; University of Newcastle; Newcastle New South Wales Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute; University of Newcastle; Newcastle New South Wales Australia
| | - Dimity Pond
- Faculty of Health and Medicine; University of Newcastle; Newcastle New South Wales Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute; University of Newcastle; Newcastle New South Wales Australia
| | - Amanda Baker
- Faculty of Health and Medicine; University of Newcastle; Newcastle New South Wales Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute; University of Newcastle; Newcastle New South Wales Australia
| | - Alyna Turner
- Faculty of Health and Medicine; University of Newcastle; Newcastle New South Wales Australia
| | - Christopher Levi
- Faculty of Health and Medicine; University of Newcastle; Newcastle New South Wales Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute; University of Newcastle; Newcastle New South Wales Australia
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Agar M, Luckett T, Luscombe G, Phillips J, Beattie E, Pond D, Mitchell G, Davidson PM, Cook J, Brooks D, Houltram J, Goodall S, Chenoweth L. Effects of facilitated family case conferencing for advanced dementia: A cluster randomised clinical trial. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0181020. [PMID: 28786995 PMCID: PMC5546584 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2017] [Accepted: 06/15/2017] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Palliative care planning for nursing home residents with advanced dementia is often suboptimal. This study compared effects of facilitated case conferencing (FCC) with usual care (UC) on end-of-life care. Methods A two arm parallel cluster randomised controlled trial was conducted. The sample included people with advanced dementia from 20 Australian nursing homes and their families and professional caregivers. In each intervention nursing home (n = 10), Palliative Care Planning Coordinators (PCPCs) facilitated family case conferences and trained staff in person-centred palliative care for 16 hours per week over 18 months. The primary outcome was family-rated quality of end-of-life care (End-of-Life Dementia [EOLD] Scales). Secondary outcomes included nurse-rated EOLD scales, resident quality of life (Quality of Life in Late-stage Dementia [QUALID]) and quality of care over the last month of life (pharmacological/non-pharmacological palliative strategies, hospitalization or inappropriate interventions). Results Two-hundred-eighty-six people with advanced dementia took part but only 131 died (64 in UC and 67 in FCC which was fewer than anticipated), rendering the primary analysis under-powered with no group effect seen in EOLD scales. Significant differences in pharmacological (P < 0.01) and non-pharmacological (P < 0.05) palliative management in last month of life were seen. Intercurrent illness was associated with lower family-rated EOLD Satisfaction with Care (coefficient 2.97, P < 0.05) and lower staff-rated EOLD Comfort Assessment with Dying (coefficient 4.37, P < 0.01). Per protocol analyses showed positive relationships between EOLD and staff hours to bed ratios, proportion of residents with dementia and staff attitudes. Conclusion FCC facilitates a palliative approach to care. Future trials of case conferencing should consider outcomes and processes regarding decision making and planning for anticipated events and acute illness. Trial registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry ACTRN12612001164886
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meera Agar
- Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, New South Wales (NSW), Australia
- South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
- Improving Palliative Care through Clinical Trials (ImPaCCT), Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Tim Luckett
- Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, New South Wales (NSW), Australia
- * E-mail:
| | - Georgina Luscombe
- Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia
| | - Jane Phillips
- Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, New South Wales (NSW), Australia
| | - Elizabeth Beattie
- School of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Herston, Queensland (QLD), Australia
| | - Dimity Pond
- School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Geoffrey Mitchell
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia
| | - Patricia M. Davidson
- Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, New South Wales (NSW), Australia
- School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Janet Cook
- Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, New South Wales (NSW), Australia
| | - Deborah Brooks
- School of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Herston, Queensland (QLD), Australia
| | - Jennifer Houltram
- Centre for Health Research and Evaluation (CHERE), Faculty of Business, UTS, Haymarket, NSW, Australia
| | - Stephen Goodall
- Centre for Health Research and Evaluation (CHERE), Faculty of Business, UTS, Haymarket, NSW, Australia
| | - Lynnette Chenoweth
- Centre for Healthy Brain Ageing, University of New South Wales, Randwick, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Clemson L, Mackenzie L, Roberts C, Poulos R, Tan A, Lovarini M, Sherrington C, Simpson JM, Willis K, Lam M, Tiedemann A, Pond D, Peiris D, Hilmer S, Pit SW, Howard K, Lovitt L, White F. Integrated solutions for sustainable fall prevention in primary care, the iSOLVE project: a type 2 hybrid effectiveness-implementation design. Implement Sci 2017; 12:12. [PMID: 28173827 PMCID: PMC5296956 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-016-0529-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2016] [Accepted: 12/01/2016] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite strong evidence giving guidance for effective fall prevention interventions in community-residing older people, there is currently no clear model for engaging general medical practitioners in fall prevention and routine use of allied health professionals in fall prevention has been slow, limiting widespread dissemination. This protocol paper outlines an implementation-effectiveness study of the Integrated Solutions for Sustainable Fall Prevention (iSOLVE) intervention which has developed integrated processes and pathways to identify older people at risk of falls and engage a whole of primary care approach to fall prevention. Methods/design This protocol paper presents the iSOLVE implementation processes and change strategies and outlines the study design of a blended type 2 hybrid design. The study consists of a two-arm cluster randomized controlled trial in 28 general practices and recruiting 560 patients in Sydney, Australia, to evaluate effectiveness of the iSOLVE intervention in changing general practitioner fall management practices and reducing patient falls and the cost effectiveness from a healthcare funder perspective. Secondary outcomes include change in medications known to increase fall risk. We will simultaneously conduct a multi-methodology evaluation to investigate the workability and utility of the implementation intervention. The implementation evaluation includes in-depth interviews and surveys with general practitioners and allied health professionals to explore acceptability and uptake of the intervention, the coherence of the proposed changes for those in the work setting, and how to facilitate the collective action needed to implement changes in practice; social network mapping will explore professional relationships and influences on referral patterns; and, a survey of GPs in the geographical intervention zone will test diffusion of evidence-based fall prevention practices. The project works in partnership with a primary care health network, state fall prevention leaders, and a community of practice of fall prevention advocates. Discussion The design is aimed at providing clear direction for sustainability and informing decisions about generalization of the iSOLVE intervention processes and change strategies. While challenges exist in hybrid designs, there is a potential for significant outcomes as the iSOLVE pathways project brings together practice and research to collectively solve a major national problem with implications for policy service delivery. Trial registration Australian New Zealand Clinial Trials Registry ACTRN12615000401550
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindy Clemson
- Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Lidcombe, Australia. .,Centre of Excellence in Population Ageing Research, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Lynette Mackenzie
- Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Lidcombe, Australia
| | - Chris Roberts
- Sydney Medical School - Northern, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Roslyn Poulos
- School of Public Health & Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Amy Tan
- Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Lidcombe, Australia
| | - Meryl Lovarini
- Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Lidcombe, Australia
| | - Cathie Sherrington
- The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Judy M Simpson
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Karen Willis
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Mary Lam
- Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Lidcombe, Australia
| | - Anne Tiedemann
- The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Dimity Pond
- School of Medicine & Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia
| | - David Peiris
- The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Sarah Hilmer
- Sydney Medical School - Northern, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Kolling Institute of Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Sabrina Winona Pit
- University Centre for Rural Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kirsten Howard
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Fiona White
- Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Lidcombe, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Laver K, Cumming R, Dyer S, Agar M, Anstey KJ, Beattie E, Brodaty H, Broe T, Clemson L, Crotty M, Dietz M, Draper B, Flicker L, Friel M, Heuzenroeder L, Koch S, Kurrle S, Nay R, Pond D, Thompson J, Santalucia Y, Whitehead C, Yates M. Evidence-based occupational therapy for people with dementia and their families: What clinical practice guidelines tell us and implications for practice. Aust Occup Ther J 2016; 64:3-10. [PMID: 27699792 DOI: 10.1111/1440-1630.12309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/06/2016] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM The first evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines and Principles of Care for People with Dementia in Australia have been released. The Guidelines detail a number of important evidence-based recommendations for occupational therapists. The aim of this paper is (1) to provide an overview of Guideline development, and (2) to describe the evidence supporting a recommendation for occupational therapy. Common characteristics of effective occupational therapy programmes for people with dementia are described. METHODS Guideline development involved adaptation of existing high-quality guidelines developed overseas and 17 systematic reviews to ensure that the most recent high-quality evidence was included. One of the systematic reviews involved examining the evidence for interventions to promote independence in people with dementia. Specifically, we looked at the evidence for occupational therapy and its effect on activities of daily living, quality of life and carer impact. RESULTS A total of 109 recommendations are included in the Guidelines. Occupational therapy was found to significantly increase independence in activities of daily living and improve quality of life. Effective occupational therapy programmes involve: environmental assessment, problem solving strategies, carer education and interactive carer skills training. CONCLUSION Occupational therapists working with people with dementia in community settings should ensure that their time is spent on those aspects of intervention that are shown to be effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Laver
- Department of Rehabilitation, Aged and Extended Care, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Robert Cumming
- Guideline Adaptation Committee, Clinical Practice Guidelines for Dementia in Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Suzanne Dyer
- Guideline Adaptation Committee, Clinical Practice Guidelines for Dementia in Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Meera Agar
- Guideline Adaptation Committee, Clinical Practice Guidelines for Dementia in Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Kaarin J Anstey
- Guideline Adaptation Committee, Clinical Practice Guidelines for Dementia in Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Elizabeth Beattie
- Guideline Adaptation Committee, Clinical Practice Guidelines for Dementia in Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Henry Brodaty
- Guideline Adaptation Committee, Clinical Practice Guidelines for Dementia in Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Tony Broe
- Guideline Adaptation Committee, Clinical Practice Guidelines for Dementia in Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Lindy Clemson
- Guideline Adaptation Committee, Clinical Practice Guidelines for Dementia in Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Maria Crotty
- Guideline Adaptation Committee, Clinical Practice Guidelines for Dementia in Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Margaret Dietz
- Guideline Adaptation Committee, Clinical Practice Guidelines for Dementia in Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Brian Draper
- Guideline Adaptation Committee, Clinical Practice Guidelines for Dementia in Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Leon Flicker
- Guideline Adaptation Committee, Clinical Practice Guidelines for Dementia in Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Meg Friel
- Guideline Adaptation Committee, Clinical Practice Guidelines for Dementia in Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Louise Heuzenroeder
- Guideline Adaptation Committee, Clinical Practice Guidelines for Dementia in Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Susan Koch
- Guideline Adaptation Committee, Clinical Practice Guidelines for Dementia in Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Sue Kurrle
- Guideline Adaptation Committee, Clinical Practice Guidelines for Dementia in Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Rhonda Nay
- Guideline Adaptation Committee, Clinical Practice Guidelines for Dementia in Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Dimity Pond
- Guideline Adaptation Committee, Clinical Practice Guidelines for Dementia in Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Jane Thompson
- Guideline Adaptation Committee, Clinical Practice Guidelines for Dementia in Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Yvonne Santalucia
- Guideline Adaptation Committee, Clinical Practice Guidelines for Dementia in Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Craig Whitehead
- Guideline Adaptation Committee, Clinical Practice Guidelines for Dementia in Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Mark Yates
- Guideline Adaptation Committee, Clinical Practice Guidelines for Dementia in Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Abstract
The modelling and computation of the coupled thermal and mechanical response of human skin at finite deformations is considered. The model extends current thermal models to account for thermally- and mechanically-induced deformations. Details of the solution of the highly nonlinear system of governing equations using the finite element method are presented. A representative numerical example illustrates the importance of considering the coupled response for the problem of a rigid, hot indenter in contact with the skin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A McBride
- School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, United Kingdom; Centre for Research in Computational and Applied Mechanics, University of Cape Town, South Africa.
| | - S Bargmann
- Institute of Continuum Mechanics and Materials Mechanics, Hamburg University of Technology, Germany; Institute of Materials Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht, Germany.
| | - D Pond
- Centre for Research in Computational and Applied Mechanics, University of Cape Town, South Africa.
| | - G Limbert
- National Centre for Advanced Tribology at Southampton (nCATS)/ Bioengineering Science Research Group, Faculty of Engineering and the Environment, University of Southampton, United Kingdom; Biomechanics and Mechanobiology Laboratory, Department of Human Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, South Africa.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Magin PJ, Morgan S, Tapley A, McCowan C, Parkinson L, Henderson KM, Muth C, Hammer MS, Pond D, Mate KE, Spike NA, McArthur LA, van Driel ML. Anticholinergic medicines in an older primary care population: a cross-sectional analysis of medicines' levels of anticholinergic activity and clinical indications. J Clin Pharm Ther 2016; 41:486-92. [PMID: 27349795 DOI: 10.1111/jcpt.12413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2016] [Accepted: 06/02/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVES Adverse clinical outcomes have been associated with cumulative anticholinergic burden (to which low-potency as well as high-potency anticholinergic medicines contribute). The clinical indications for which anticholinergic medicines are prescribed (and thus the 'phenotype' of patients with anticholinergic burden) have not been established. We sought to establish the overall prevalence of prescribing of anticholinergic medicines, the prevalence of prescribing of low-, medium- and high-potency anticholinergic medicines, and the clinical indications for which the medicines were prescribed in an older primary care population. METHODS This was a cross-sectional analysis of a cohort study of Australian early-career general practitioners' (GPs') clinical consultations - the Registrar Clinical Encounters in Training (ReCEnT) study. In ReCEnT, GPs collect detailed data (including medicines prescribed and their clinical indication) for 60 consecutive patients, on up to three occasions 6 months apart. Anticholinergic medicines were categorized as levels 1 (low-potency) to 3 (high-potency) using the Anticholinergic Drug Scale (ADS). RESULTS During 2010-2014, 879 early-career GPs (across five of Australia's six states) conducted 20 555 consultations with patients aged 65 years or older, representing 35 506 problems/diagnoses. Anticholinergic medicines were prescribed in 10·4% [95% CIs 9·5-10·5] of consultations. Of the total anticholinergic load of prescribed medicines ('community anticholinergic load') 72·7% [95% CIs 71·0-74·3] was contributed by Level 1 medicines, 0·8% [95% CIs 0·5-1·3] by Level 2 medicines and 26·5% [95% CIs 24·8-28·1] by Level 3 medicines. Cardiac (40·0%), Musculoskeletal (16·9%) and Respiratory (10·6%) were the most common indications associated with Level 1 anticholinergic prescription. For Level 2 and 3 medicines (combined data), Psychological (16·1%), Neurological (16·1%), Musculoskeletal (15·7%) and Urological (11·1%) indications were most common. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION Anticholinergic medicines are frequently prescribed in Australian general practice, and the majority of the 'community' anticholinergic burden is contributed by 'low'-anticholinergic potency medicines whose anticholinergic effects may be largely 'invisible' to prescribing GPs. Furthermore, the clinical 'phenotype' of the patient with high anticholinergic burden may be very different to common stereotypes (patients with urological, psychological or neurological problems), potentially making recognition of risk of anticholinergic adverse effects additionally problematic for GPs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P J Magin
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - S Morgan
- Elermore Vale General Practice, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - A Tapley
- GP Synergy, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | | | - L Parkinson
- School of Human Health and Social Sciences, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, QLD, Australia
| | | | - C Muth
- Institute of General Practice, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - M S Hammer
- Institute of General Practice, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - D Pond
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - K E Mate
- School of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - N A Spike
- Eastern Victoria GP Training, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | - M L van Driel
- School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Parkinson L, Moorin R, Peeters G, Byles J, Blyth F, Caughey G, Cunich M, Magin P, March L, Pond D. Incident osteoarthritis associated with increased allied health services use in ‘baby boomer’ Australian women. Aust N Z J Public Health 2016; 40:356-61. [DOI: 10.1111/1753-6405.12533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2015] [Revised: 11/01/2015] [Accepted: 01/01/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Lynne Parkinson
- Central Queensland University; Human Health and Social Sciences
| | - Rachael Moorin
- Centre for Population Health Research; Curtin University of Technology; Western Australia
| | - Geeske Peeters
- School of Population Health; The University of Queensland
- School of Human Movement Studies; The University of Queensland
| | - Julie Byles
- Research Centre for Gender, Health and Ageing; The University of Newcastle; New South Wales
| | - Fiona Blyth
- Concord Clinical School; University of Sydney; New South Wales
| | - Gillian Caughey
- Quality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, Sansom Institute for Health Research; University of South Australia
| | - Michelle Cunich
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre; University of Sydney; New South Wales
| | - Parker Magin
- Discipline of General Practice; The University of Newcastle; New South Wales
- Research Centre for Gender, Health and Ageing; The University of Newcastle; New South Wales
| | - Lyn March
- Department of Public Health; University of Sydney; New South Wales
| | - Dimity Pond
- Discipline of General Practice; The University of Newcastle; New South Wales
- Research Centre for Gender, Health and Ageing; The University of Newcastle; New South Wales
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Magin P, Juratowitch L, Dunbabin J, McElduff P, Goode S, Tapley A, Pond D. Attitudes to Alzheimer's disease testing of Australian general practice patients: a cross-sectional questionnaire-based study. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2016; 31:361-6. [PMID: 26258761 DOI: 10.1002/gps.4335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2015] [Revised: 06/28/2015] [Accepted: 07/07/2015] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In view of proposed screening for presymptomatic Alzheimer's disease (AD) with advanced imaging, and blood and cerebral spinal fluid analysis, we aimed to establish levels, and associations, of acceptance of AD testing modalities by general practice patients. METHODS A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study of consecutive patients (aged 50 years and over) of general practices of an Australian practice-based research network was used. The questionnaire elicited demographic data and attitudes to screening for other diseases and included the screening acceptance domain of the Perceptions Regarding Investigational Screening for Memory in Primary Care (PRISM-PC) instrument. This assesses receptivity to modalities of testing for AD: short questionnaire, blood test, cerebral imaging, and annual physician examination. Reflecting speculation of possible future AD diagnostic methods, an item regarding testing cerebral spinal fluid was also included. Associations of PRISM-PC scores were analyzed with multiple linear regression. RESULTS Of 489 participants (response rate 87%), 66.2% would like to know if they had AD. Participants were more accepting of testing modalities that were noninvasive or familiar (questionnaire, physician's examination, and blood test) as opposed to cerebral imaging or lumbar puncture. Attitudes to AD testing are influenced by a positive attitude to disease screening in general. Patients with a self-perceived higher risk of AD were less accepting of testing, as were participants with an educational level of junior high school (10 school years) or less. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates that a majority of patients would like to know if they have AD. Acceptability of testing modalities, however, varies. Noninvasive, familiar methods are more acceptable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Parker Magin
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.,General Practice Training Valley to Coast, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Laura Juratowitch
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Janet Dunbabin
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Patrick McElduff
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Susan Goode
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Amanda Tapley
- General Practice Training Valley to Coast, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Dimity Pond
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Mate KE, Kerr KP, Pond D, Williams EJ, Marley J, Disler P, Brodaty H, Magin PJ. Impact of multiple low-level anticholinergic medications on anticholinergic load of community-dwelling elderly with and without dementia. Drugs Aging 2016; 32:159-67. [PMID: 25566958 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-014-0230-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Elderly people, particularly those with dementia, are sensitive to adverse anticholinergic drug effects. This study examines the prevalence of anticholinergic medication, and anticholinergic load and its predictors, in community-dwelling elderly patients (aged 75 years and older) in Australia. METHODS A research nurse visited the home of each participant (n = 1,044), compiled a list of current medications, and assessed participants' cognitive status using a subsection of the revised Cambridge Examination for Mental Disorders of the Elderly (CAMCOG-R). Anticholinergic load was determined for each patient using the Anticholinergic Drug Scale (ADS). RESULTS Multivariate analysis identified several patient factors that were associated with higher anticholinergic burden, including polypharmacy (i.e. taking five or more medications) (p < 0.001), increasing age (p = 0.018), CAMCOG-R dementia (p = 0.003), depression (p = 0.003), and lower physical quality of life (p < 0.001). The dementia group (n = 86) took a significantly higher number of medications (4.6 vs. 3.9; p = 0.04), and had a significantly higher anticholinergic load (1.5 vs. 0.8; p = 0.002) than those without dementia (n = 958). Approximately 60% of the dementia group and 40% of the non-dementia group were receiving at least one anticholinergic drug. This difference was due to the higher proportion of dementia patients taking level 1 (potentially anticholinergic) (p = 0.002) and level 3 (markedly anticholinergic) (p = 0.005) drugs. CONCLUSIONS There is considerable scope for the improvement of prescribing practices in the elderly, and particularly those with dementia. Importantly, level 1 anticholinergics have been identified as major contributors to the anticholinergic load in people with dementia. Longitudinal studies are required to determine the effects of increased and decreased anticholinergic load on cognitive function and other clinical outcomes for people with dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen E Mate
- School of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|