Making informed choices on incorporating chemoprevention into carE (MiCHOICE, SWOG 1904): Design and methods of a cluster randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Women with atypical hyperplasia (AH) or lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) have a significantly increased risk of breast cancer, which can be substantially reduced with antiestrogen therapy for chemoprevention. However, antiestrogen therapy for breast cancer risk reduction remains underutilized. Improving knowledge about breast cancer risk and chemoprevention among high-risk patients and their healthcare providers may enhance informed decision-making about this critical breast cancer risk reduction strategy.

METHODS/DESIGN

We are conducting a cluster randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness and implementation of patient and provider decision support tools to improve informed choice about chemoprevention among women with AH or LCIS. We have cluster randomized 26 sites across the U.S. through the SWOG Cancer Research Network. A total of 415 patients and 200 healthcare providers are being recruited. They are assigned to standard educational materials alone or combined with the web-based decision support tools. Patient-reported and clinical outcomes are assessed at baseline, after a follow-up visit at 6 months, and yearly for 5 years. The primary outcome is chemoprevention informed choice after the follow-up visit. Secondary endpoints include other patient-reported outcomes, such as chemoprevention knowledge, decision conflict and regret, and self-reported chemoprevention usage. Barriers and facilitators to implementing decision support into clinic workflow are assessed through patient and provider interviews at baseline and mid-implementation.

RESULTS/DISCUSSION

With this hybrid effectiveness/implementation study, we seek to evaluate if a multi-level intervention effectively promotes informed decision-making about chemoprevention and provide valuable insights on how the intervention is implemented in U.S.

CLINICAL SETTINGS

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT04496739.

Society of Surgical Oncology Breast Disease Site Working Group Statement on Contralateral Mastectomy: Indications, Outcomes, and Risks

Rates of contralateral mastectomy (CM) among patients with unilateral breast cancer have been increasing in the United States. In this Society of Surgical Oncology position statement, we review the literature addressing the indications, risks, and benefits of CM since the society's 2017 statement. We held a virtual meeting to outline key topics and then conducted a literature search using PubMed to identify relevant articles. We reviewed the articles and made recommendations based on group consensus. Patients consider CM for many reasons, including concerns regarding the risk of contralateral breast cancer (CBC), desire for improved cosmesis and symmetry, and preferences to avoid ongoing screening, whereas surgeons primarily consider CBC risk when making a recommendation for CM. For patients with a high risk of CBC, CM reduces the risk of new breast cancer, however it is not known to convey an overall survival benefit. Studies evaluating patient satisfaction with CM and reconstruction have yielded mixed results. Imaging with mammography within 12 months before CM is recommended, but routine preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging is not; there is also no evidence to support routine postmastectomy imaging surveillance. Because the likelihood of identifying an occult malignancy during CM is low, routine sentinel lymph node surgery is not recommended. Data on the rates of postoperative complications are conflicting, and such complications may not be directly related to CM. Adjuvant therapy delays due to complications have not been reported. Surgeons can reduce CM rates by encouraging shared decision making and informed discussions incorporating patient preferences.

Implementation of a Breast Intraoperative Oncoplastic Form to Aid Management of Oncoplastic Surgery

INTRODUCTION

Oncoplastic breast conservation surgery (BCS) uses concurrent reduction and/or mastopexy with lumpectomy to improve aesthetic outcomes. However, tissue rearrangement can shift the original tumor location site in relation to external breast landmarks, resulting in difficulties during re-excision for a positive margin and accurate radiation targeting. We developed the Breast Intraoperative Oncoplastic (BIO) form to help depict the location of the tumor and breast reduction specimen. This study seeks to assess physician perspectives of the implementation outcomes.

METHODS

From February 2021 to April 2021, the BIO form was used in 11 oncoplastic BCS cases at a single institution. With institutional review board approval, surgical oncologists (SOs), plastic surgeons (PSs), and radiation oncologists (ROs) were administered a 12-question validated survey on Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM), and Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM), using a 5-point Likert scale during initial implementation and at 6-month reassessment.

RESULTS

Twelve physicians completed the survey initially (4 SOs, 4 PSs, and 4 ROs). The mean scores for Acceptability of Intervention Measure, Intervention Appropriateness Measure, and Feasibility of Intervention Measure were high (4.44, 4.56, and 4.56, respectively). Twelve completed the second survey (5 SOs, 3 PSs, and 4 ROs). The mean scores were marginally lower (4.06, 4.21, and 4.25). There were no significant differences when stratified by number of years in practice or specialty. Free text comments showed that 75% of physicians found the form helpful in oncoplastic BCS.

CONCLUSIONS

The data indicate high feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of the BIO form. Results of this study suggest multidisciplinary benefits of implementing the BIO form in oncoplastic BCS.

NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Breast Cancer, Version 4.2023

The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Breast Cancer address all aspects of management for breast cancer. The treatment landscape of metastatic breast cancer is evolving constantly. The therapeutic strategy takes into consideration tumor biology, biomarkers, and other clinical factors. Due to the growing number of treatment options, if one option fails, there is usually another line of therapy available, providing meaningful improvements in survival. This NCCN Guidelines Insights report focuses on recent updates specific to systemic therapy recommendations for patients with stage IV (M1) disease.

Therapeutic Value of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients With Melanoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is a standard staging procedure for cutaneous melanoma. Regional disease control is a clinically important therapeutic goal of surgical intervention, including nodal surgery.

Objective

To determine how frequently SLN biopsy without completion lymph node dissection (CLND) results in long-term regional nodal disease control in patients with SLN metastases.

Design, Setting, and Participants

The second Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial (MSLT-II), a prospective multicenter randomized clinical trial, randomized participants with SLN metastases to either CLND or nodal observation. The current analysis examines observation patients with regard to regional nodal recurrence. Trial patients were aged 18 to 75 years with melanoma metastatic to SLN(s). Data were collected from December 2004 to April 2019, and data were analyzed from July 2020 to January 2022.

Interventions

Nodal observation with ultrasonography rather than CLND.

Main Outcomes and Measures

In-basin nodal recurrence.

Results

Of 823 included patients, 479 (58.2%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 52.8 (13.8) years. Among 855 observed basins, at 10 years, 80.2% (actuarial; 95% CI, 77-83) of basins were free of nodal recurrence. By univariable analysis, freedom from regional nodal recurrence was associated with age younger than 50 years (hazard ratio [HR], 0.49; 95% CI, 0.34-0.70; P < .001), nonulcerated melanoma (HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.36-0.49; P < .001), thinner primary melanoma (less than 1.5 mm; HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.27-0.78; P = .004), axillary basin (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.44-0.86; P = .005), fewer positive SLNs (1 vs 3 or more; HR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.14-0.75; P = .008), and SLN tumor burden (measured by diameter less than 1 mm [HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.26-0.60; P = .001] or less than 5% area [HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.24-0.54; P < .001]). By multivariable analysis, younger age (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.39-0.84; P = .004), thinner primary melanoma (HR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.22-0.70; P = .002), axillary basin (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.31-0.96; P = .03), SLN metastasis diameter less than 1 mm (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.33-0.81; P = .007), and area less than 5% (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.38-0.88; P = .01) were associated with basin control. When looking at the identified risk factors of age (50 years or older), ulceration, Breslow thickness greater than 3.5 mm, nonaxillary basin, and tumor burden of maximum diameter of 1 mm or greater and/or metastasis area of 5% or greater and excluding missing value cases, basin disease-free rates at 5 years were 96% (95% CI, 88-100) for patients with 0 risk factors, 89% (95% CI, 82-96) for 1 risk factor, 86% (95% CI, 80-93) for 2 risk factors, 80% (95% CI, 71-89) for 3 risk factors, 61% (95% CI, 48-74) for 4 risk factors, and 54% (95% CI, 36-72) for 5 or 6 risk factors.

Conclusions and Relevance

This randomized clinical trial was the largest prospective evaluation of long-term regional basin control in patients with melanoma who had nodal observation after removal of a positive SLN. SLN biopsy without CLND cleared disease in the affected nodal basin in most patients, even those with multiple risk factors for in-basin recurrence. In addition to its well-validated value in staging, SLN biopsy may also be regarded as therapeutic in some patients.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00297895.

Breast Cancer, Version 3.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

The therapeutic options for patients with noninvasive or invasive breast cancer are complex and varied. These NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines for Breast Cancer include recommendations for clinical management of patients with carcinoma in situ, invasive breast cancer, Paget disease, phyllodes tumor, inflammatory breast cancer, and management of breast cancer during pregnancy. The content featured in this issue focuses on the recommendations for overall management of ductal carcinoma in situ and the workup and locoregional management of early stage invasive breast cancer. For the full version of the NCCN Guidelines for Breast Cancer, visit NCCN.org.

Prospective pilot study protocol evaluating the safety and feasibility of robot-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy (RNSM)

INTRODUCTION

Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) can be performed for the treatment of breast cancer and risk reduction, but total mammary glandular excision in NSM can be technically challenging. Minimally invasive robot-assisted NSM (RNSM) has the potential to improve the ergonomic challenges of open NSM. Recent studies in RNSM demonstrate the feasibility and safety of the procedure, but this technique is still novel in the USA.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a single-arm prospective pilot study to determine the safety, efficacy and potential risks of RNSM. Up to 12 RNSM will be performed to assess the safety and feasibility of the procedure. Routine follow-up visits and study assessments will occur at 14 days, 30 days, 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months. The primary outcome is to assess the feasibility of removing the breast gland en bloc using the RNSM technique. To assess safety, postoperative complication information will be collected. Secondary outcomes include defining benefits and challenges of RNSM for both surgeons and patients using surveys, as well as defining the breast and nipple-areolar complex sensation recovery following RNSM. Mainly, descriptive analysis will be used to report the findings.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The RNSM protocol was reviewed and approved by the US Food and Drug Administration using the Investigational Device Exemption mechanism (reference number G200096). In addition, the protocol was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04537312) and approved by The Ohio State University Institutional Review Board, reference number 2020C0094 (18 August 2020). The results of this study will be distributed through peer-reviewed journals and presented at surgical conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04537312.

Talimogene laherparepvec pseudolymphomatous reaction mimicking metastatic melanoma

Talimogene laherparepvec (TVEC) is a genetically modified herpes simplex virus-1 approved as an intralesional oncolytic immunotherapy for the treatment of advanced melanoma. Cutaneous reactions at the site of injection may mimic recurrent or progressive melanoma; histopathological findings have included chronic granulomatous dermatitis, neutrophilic dermatitis, lymphocytic dermatitis, and pigment incontinence. We report a 39-year-old male with metastatic stage IIIc melanoma treated with TVEC with clinical regression of melanoma lesions that later developed pink nodules at sites of prior injection. Histopathology demonstrated a nodular mononuclear infiltrate that stained strongly and diffusely with CD45 and CD20 with a surrounding rim of CD3-positive T-cells. Immunoglobulin gene rearrangement was negative for a clonal B-cell population. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a pseudolymphomatous reaction mimicking recurrent melanoma after TVEC therapy.

NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Breast Cancer, Version 4.2021

The NCCN Guidelines for Breast Cancer include up-to-date guidelines for clinical management of patients with carcinoma in situ, invasive breast cancer, Paget disease, phyllodes tumor, inflammatory breast cancer, male breast cancer, and breast cancer during pregnancy. These guidelines are developed by a multidisciplinary panel of representatives from NCCN Member Institutions with breast cancer-focused expertise in the fields of medical oncology, surgical oncology, radiation oncology, pathology, reconstructive surgery, and patient advocacy. These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on the most recent updates to recommendations for adjuvant systemic therapy in patients with nonmetastatic, early-stage, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.

Patient Response to Receiving a Notification of Elevated Breast Cancer Risk after Regular Screening Mammogram

Background: Population-based screening for breast cancer risk can identify unaffected women at elevated risk and inform them of risk-management options. The James Cancer Hospital recently began assessing risk for women undergoing routine screening mammography. Women found to have ≥20% lifetime risk are notified – with their mammogram results via mail and electronic medical record – that they may be at elevated risk of breast cancer and should consider consulting a high-risk provider. This initial study examined findings from a subsample who participated 2–6 weeks post-notification. Purpose: We sought to determine whether women noticed and understood the notification, and to examine their reactions to the notification of elevated risk. Methods: Of 415 women recruited, 150 (36%) completed the survey, which included items to assess memory and comprehension of the notification, and whether participants had (a) seen a healthcare provider since the notification, and (b) discussed breast cancer risk and management options during that appointment. Results: Participants (aged 40–69; mean = 50.8 years) were mostly White (86%), well-educated (77%), and with above-average income (65%). Most remembered receiving the notification (73%), perceived the information not to be complex (73%), and were confident they understood the notification (93%). Somewhat fewer (64%) remembered that the notification indicated they may be at elevated risk for breast cancer, and 44% also recalled the suggestion to meet with a healthcare provider about this risk. Of the 28 participants who had already seen any healthcare provider in the few weeks since the notification, 50% discussed breast cancer risk during that appointment and 25% said they did so because of the notification. Discussions included family cancer history, actual risk of developing breast cancer, and options for additional imaging or testing. Conclusions: These findings indicate that population-based screening associated with routine mammography can motivate women at elevated breast cancer risk to discuss their risk and management options with a healthcare provider. For some proportion of women, however, complementary communication strategies may also be needed to ensure they gain awareness of their higher-risk status.

Concurrent germline BRCA1, BRCA2, and CHEK2 pathogenic variants in hereditary breast cancer: a case series

Background

Concurrent germline (g) pathogenic variants related to hereditary breast cancer represent a rare occurrence. While double heterozygosity in gBRCA1 and gBRCA2 has been reported in the past, herein we describe the first case of three known concurrent pathogenic variants identified in a family with a strong history of breast cancer.

Case presentation

The proband is a 55-year-old female diagnosed with synchronous bilateral breast cancers. She underwent a multi-gene panel testing indicating the presence of 3 concurrent heterozygous germline deleterious variants in BRCA1 (c.181T > G), BRCA2 (c.4398_4402delACATT), and CHEK2 (1100delC). The patient’s two daughters (34 and 29 years-old) were found to be transheterozygous for inherited pathogenic variants in BRCA1 (c.181T > G) and CHEK2 (1100delC) genes.

Conclusion

The cancer risk and phenotypic manifestations associated with transheterozygous or multiple concurrent deleterious germline variants in hereditary breast cancer requires further investigation. A personalized approach to counseling, screening, and risk reduction should be undertaken for these individuals.

Breast Cancer, Version 3.2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

Several new systemic therapy options have become available for patients with metastatic breast cancer, which have led to improvements in survival. In addition to patient and clinical factors, the treatment selection primarily depends on the tumor biology (hormone-receptor status and HER2-status). The NCCN Guidelines specific to the workup and treatment of patients with recurrent/stage IV breast cancer are discussed in this article.

Abstract OT2-04-04: Multi-institution phase II trial of intraoperative electron beam radiotherapy boost at the time of breast conserving surgery with oncoplastic reconstruction in women with early-stage breast cancer

Background: In women amenable to breast conserving therapy, lumpectomy followed by adjuvant whole breast irradiation (WBI) remains the standard of care. Randomized trials demonstrate that addition of a lumpectomy cavity boost significantly reduces the risk of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences but also increases the risk of breast fibrosis. Contemporary randomized trials define the lumpectomy cavity boost volume as a 1.7 cm isometric expansion on the lumpectomy cavity as delineated on CT. However, identifying the lumpectomy cavity can be challenging, especially in women that receive adjuvant chemotherapy and in cases in which surgical clips are not present. Recently, the use of oncoplastic techniques in breast conserving surgery has increased. These techniques are used to prevent the poor cosmetic results that can occur when a large volume of breast tissue is resected. Women that undergo oncoplastic reconstruction represent especially difficult cases for lumpectomy cavity delineation. Retrospective series have evaluated the use of intraoperative electron radiotherapy (IOERT) as a boost prior to WBI in women receiving lumpectomy without oncoplastic reconstruction. In the largest series of IOERT boost prior to WBI the local control rate of this approach was &gt;99%. Prospective data regarding IOERT boost in women undergoing oncoplastic reconstruction are limited. The advantages of this approach include direct visualization/irradiation of the tumor bed, sparing the skin of irradiation, and reducing the treatment time by ˜1 week. We hypothesize that IOERT boost followed by WBI will result in acceptably low rates of grade 3 fibrosis in women undergoing lumpectomy with oncoplastic reconstruction.

Trial Design: This is a single-arm, prospective study to evaluate the safety, toxicity and efficacy of IOERT boost at the time of breast conserving surgery in women with early-stage breast cancer undergoing oncoplastic reconstruction. Eligible women will receive 1 dose of 8 Gy to the surgical bed after lumpectomy but prior to oncoplastic reconstruction. Women will then receive adjuvant WBI of 40 Gy in 15 fractions or 50 Gy in 25 fractions.

Eligibility: Key criteria include age≥18 yo, clinically node-negative stage I/II, any breast cancer subtype.

Specific Aims: To determine the rate of grade 3 breast fibrosis at 1 year. Additional aims include surgical complication rates, cosmesis, and local regional cancer control.

Statistical Methods: Safety will be evaluated by the rate of surgical complications necessitating hospital readmission or return to the operating room within 30 days of surgery+IOERT. If ≥4 events in the first 10 patients, ≥7 events in the first 20 patients, or ≥9 events in the first 30 patients are seen, the study will be halted. We hypothesize that the grade 3 fibrosis rate in our study will be ≤5%. Assuming an actual rate of 4%, an unacceptable rate of 9%, and a drop-out rate of 10%, the expected sample size is 176.

Sites: Ohio State University, Avera Medical Group, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill

Patient Accrual: Current accrual is 5/176.

Contact Information: Jose Bazan (jose.bazan2@osumc.edu)

Funding Source: Intraop Medical

Citation Format: Bazan JG, Stephens J, Agnese D, Skoracki R, Arneson K, Reiland J, Gupta G, Gallagher K, McElroy S, Gupta N, White JR. Multi-institution phase II trial of intraoperative electron beam radiotherapy boost at the time of breast conserving surgery with oncoplastic reconstruction in women with early-stage breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-04-04.

The Impact of Smoking on Sentinel Node Metastasis of Primary Cutaneous Melanoma

BACKGROUND

Although a well-established causative relationship exists between smoking and several epithelial cancers, the association of smoking with metastatic progression in melanoma is not well studied. We hypothesized that smokers would be at increased risk for melanoma metastasis as assessed by sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy.

METHODS

Data from the first international Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial (MSLT-I) and the screening-phase of the second trial (MSLT-II) were analyzed to determine the association of smoking with clinicopathologic variables and SLN metastasis.

RESULTS

Current smoking was strongly associated with SLN metastasis (p = 0.004), even after adjusting for other predictors of metastasis. Among 4231 patients (1025 in MSLT-I and 3206 in MSLT-II), current or former smoking was also independently associated with ulceration (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Compared with current smoking, never smoking was independently associated with decreased Breslow thickness in multivariate analysis (p = 0.002) and with a 0.25 mm predicted decrease in thickness.

CONCLUSION

The direct correlation between current smoking and SLN metastasis of primary cutaneous melanoma was independent of its correlation with tumor thickness and ulceration. Smoking cessation should be strongly encouraged among patients with or at risk for melanoma.

Completion Dissection or Observation for Sentinel-Node Metastasis in Melanoma

BACKGROUND

Sentinel-lymph-node biopsy is associated with increased melanoma-specific survival (i.e., survival until death from melanoma) among patients with node-positive intermediate-thickness melanomas (1.2 to 3.5 mm). The value of completion lymph-node dissection for patients with sentinel-node metastases is not clear.

METHODS

In an international trial, we randomly assigned patients with sentinel-node metastases detected by means of standard pathological assessment or a multimarker molecular assay to immediate completion lymph-node dissection (dissection group) or nodal observation with ultrasonography (observation group). The primary end point was melanoma-specific survival. Secondary end points included disease-free survival and the cumulative rate of nonsentinel-node metastasis.

RESULTS

Immediate completion lymph-node dissection was not associated with increased melanoma-specific survival among 1934 patients with data that could be evaluated in an intention-to-treat analysis or among 1755 patients in the per-protocol analysis. In the per-protocol analysis, the mean (±SE) 3-year rate of melanoma-specific survival was similar in the dissection group and the observation group (86±1.3% and 86±1.2%, respectively; P=0.42 by the log-rank test) at a median follow-up of 43 months. The rate of disease-free survival was slightly higher in the dissection group than in the observation group (68±1.7% and 63±1.7%, respectively; P=0.05 by the log-rank test) at 3 years, based on an increased rate of disease control in the regional nodes at 3 years (92±1.0% vs. 77±1.5%; P<0.001 by the log-rank test); these results must be interpreted with caution. Nonsentinel-node metastases, identified in 11.5% of the patients in the dissection group, were a strong, independent prognostic factor for recurrence (hazard ratio, 1.78; P=0.005). Lymphedema was observed in 24.1% of the patients in the dissection group and in 6.3% of those in the observation group.

CONCLUSIONS

Immediate completion lymph-node dissection increased the rate of regional disease control and provided prognostic information but did not increase melanoma-specific survival among patients with melanoma and sentinel-node metastases. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and others; MSLT-II ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00297895 .).

Plasma MicroRNA Levels Following Resection of Metastatic Melanoma

Melanoma remains the leading cause of skin cancer–related deaths. Surgical resection and adjuvant therapies can result in disease-free intervals for stage III and stage IV disease; however, recurrence is common. Understanding microRNA (miR) dynamics following surgical resection of melanomas is critical to accurately interpret miR changes suggestive of melanoma recurrence. Plasma of 6 patients with stage III (n = 2) and stage IV (n = 4) melanoma was evaluated using the NanoString platform to determine pre- and postsurgical miR expression profiles, enabling analysis of more than 800 miRs simultaneously in 12 samples. Principal component analysis detected underlying patterns of miR expression between pre- vs postsurgical patients. Group A contained 3 of 4 patients with stage IV disease (pre- and postsurgical samples) and 2 patients with stage III disease (postsurgical samples only). The corresponding preoperative samples to both individuals with stage III disease were contained in group B along with 1 individual with stage IV disease (pre- and postsurgical samples). Group A was distinguished from group B by statistically significant analysis of variance changes in miR expression (P < .0001). This analysis revealed that group A vs group B had downregulation of let-7b-5p, miR-520f, miR-720, miR-4454, miR-21-5p, miR-22-3p, miR-151a-3p, miR-378e, and miR-1283 and upregulation of miR-126-3p, miR-223-3p, miR-451a, let-7a-5p, let-7g-5p, miR-15b-5p, miR-16-5p, miR-20a-5p, miR-20b-5p, miR-23a-3p, miR-26a-5p, miR-106a-5p, miR-17-5p, miR-130a-3p, miR-142-3p, miR-150-5p, miR-191-5p, miR-199a-3p, miR-199b-3p, and miR-1976. Changes in miR expression were not readily evident in individuals with distant metastatic disease (stage IV) as these individuals may have prolonged inflammatory responses. Thus, inflammatory-driven miRs coinciding with tumor-derived miRs can blunt anticipated changes in expression profiles following surgical resection.

Abstract P3-12-01: Locoregional failure rates do not vary by breast cancer subtype after mastectomy in a modern cohort of patients with T1-2 tumors with 1-3 pathologically involved lymph nodes

Purpose/Objective(s): A recent meta-analysis of 22 randomized trials accrued between 1964-86 demonstrated significantly higher rates of locoregional failure (LRF), total failure (TF) and breast-cancer mortality in women with 1-3 positive (+) axillary lymph nodes (ALN) who did not receive radiotherapy after mastectomy (mast.). Given the improvements in diagnostic and therapeutic approaches, the challenge today is whether breast cancer patients with T1-T2 tumors with 1-3+ ALN have similar substantial risk that routinely warrants the delivery of post mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT). We further set out to explore whether the risk of failure varies by breast cancer subtype.

Materials/Methods: We reviewed patients with pathologic T1-2N1 breast cancer treated with initial mast. and adjuvant systemic therapy (ST) from 2000-2013. The primary endpoint was LRF, defined as a recurrence in either the ipsilateral chestwall or regional lympatics (axillary, internal mammary, or supraclavicular nodes). Secondary endpoints include rates of TF (LRF or distant metastases), disease-free survival (DFS, failure or death), and overall survival (OS). Patients were classified into 3 basic subtypes: hormone receptor positive/HER2 negative (HR+), HER2 positive (HER2+), and triple negative (TN). Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The log-rank test was used to compare survival between groups.

Results: We identified 550 eligible patients from our prospectively maintained cancer registry. Median follow-up was 5 years. Baseline characteristics included median age 53 yrs, 61% pathologic T2, 39% grade 3, 48% with lymphovascular invasion. Subtypes included 72% HR+ (n=393), 16% HER2+ (n=89), 12% TN (n=66) and 0.4% unknown (n=2). Treatment included chemotherapy in 78% (n=428), PMRT in 15% (n=82), and anti-endocrine therapy in 70% (n=385). A median of 18 ALN (range, 1-68) were removed, 10% (N=55) had sentinel-lymph node biopsy only, and 17%(N=95) had micrometastases (N1mic) only. A total of 296 pts had 1+ node, 165 pts 2+ nodes and 89 pts 3+ nodes. The 5 yr LRF rate for the entire cohort was 3.9% and patients with 1+, 2+, and 3+ nodes had 5 yr LRF of 2.6%, 4.7% and 6.4%, respectively (p=0.79). The 5 yr LRF for HR+, HER2+ and TN was 3.9%, 1.5%, and 6.6%, respectively (p=0.39). When stratified by 1+, 2+ or 3+ nodes, the 5 yr LRF for HR+ vs. HER2+ vs. TN were 2.4%, 6.8%, and 0% vs. 5.8%, 15.4%, and 0% vs. 5.7%, 0%, and 4.8%, p=0.43. The 5 yr TF, DFS, and OS rates for HR+, HER2+ and TN were 90.5% vs. 88.5%. vs. 83.6% (p=0.76); 84.9% vs. 82.6% vs. 79.2% (p=0.85); and 91.4% vs. 86.2% vs. 81.3% (p=0.83).

Conclusions: In a cohort of patients with T1-2N1 breast cancer treated with modern therapy, we found low rates of LRF which did not vary amongst HR+, HER2+ and TN patients. In particular, HR+ patients with 1+ LN had extremely low rates of LRF Given these low recurrence rates, caution should be given in routinely recommending PMRT for every woman with 1-3+ ALN after mast. and adjuvant ST.

Citation Format: Bazan JG, Majithia L, Quick AM, Terando AM, Agnese D, Mrozek E, Farrar W, White JR. Locoregional failure rates do not vary by breast cancer subtype after mastectomy in a modern cohort of patients with T1-2 tumors with 1-3 pathologically involved lymph nodes. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-12-01.

Perception of cancer recurrence risk: more information is better

OBJECTIVE

Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women worldwide. Given the advances in extending survival, the number of recently diagnosed breast cancer patients and longer-term breast cancer survivors is growing. The goals of this study were to better understand (1) perceptions of provider cancer recurrence risk communication, (2) perceived risk of breast cancer recurrence in cancer patients and survivors, and (3) accuracy of perceived risk.

METHODS

A survey was conducted on women with a prior breast cancer (n=141).

RESULTS

Approximately 40% of women perceived that providers had not talked about their breast cancer recurrence risk; although only 1 person reported not wanting a physician to talk to her about her risk. Women were largely inaccurate in their assessments of risk. Greater worry, living in a rural area, and longer time since diagnosis were associated with greater inaccuracy. Women tended to think about distal recurrence of cancer as often of local recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Perceived risk of breast cancer recurrence was inaccurate, and patients desired more communication about recurrence risk.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Consistent with findings from other studies, greater efforts are needed to improve the communication of cancer recurrence risk to patients. Attention should be paid to those from rural areas and to distal cancer recurrence in women with a previous history of breast cancer.

Living post treatment: definitions of those with history and no history of cancer

INTRODUCTION

Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer, and the second leading cause of cancer death in women. Due to advances in medicine, the 10 year survival rate is 80%, resulting in a large and growing number of breast cancer survivors. Definitions of cancer survivorship from a number of professional organizations and researchers vary, but the research is scant on the meaning of cancer survivorship to people with and without a prior cancer history.

METHODS

Two studies were conducted (1) to compare individuals with and without a prior personal cancer diagnosis in terms of those who identified as survivors vs. those who did not identify as survivors and (2) to explore explanations of those with and without a prior personal cancer for the term cancer survivor. In Study 1, individuals were surveyed at cancer-themed community health fairs. In Study 2, women were surveyed at a breast oncology clinic.

RESULTS

In Study 1 comparing those with and without a prior cancer diagnosis, prior cancer history was the best predictor of survivorship identity, and only three individuals without a prior cancer history included family and friends as survivors. In Study 2 of those with a personal history, longer time since diagnosis, type of cancer (ductal), and comparative risk (higher) were associated with survivor identity.

CONCLUSION

Completion of treatment was seen as a 'rite of passage', and thus, may be seen as a shift from the patient identity, which may have negative connotations, to the positive identity of survivor.

IMPLICATIONS

Definitions of survivorship vary considerably, and caution should be used when applying the term to those who have no prior personal cancer diagnosis and to those who have had a more recent cancer diagnosis with a more severe disease course.

Pharmacokinetics and clinical evaluation of 125I-radiolabeled humanized CC49 monoclonal antibody (HuCC49deltaC(H)2) in recurrent and metastatic colorectal cancer patients

INTRODUCTION

CC49 is an antitumor monoclonal antibody that is promising for use in radioimmunoguided surgery (RIGS). However, the murine antibody has been limited by human antimouse antibody (HAMA) response and slow clearance. This study examined the pharmacokinetics and tissue localization of a humanized domain-deleted CC49 antibody (HuCC49DeltaC(H)2 MAb) in humans.

METHODS

Twenty-one patients with colorectal carcinoma were given 1 mg intravenous (I.V.) bolus of HuCC49DeltaC(H)2 MAb radiolabeled with 2 mCi (125)I after thyroid blockade. The level of circulating HuCC49DeltaC(H)2 MAb was measured daily as precordial counts using a handheld gamma-detecting probe. Each patient underwent an exploratory laparotomy on postinjection days 3-20. Gamma counts were measured at normal organs, aortic bifurcation (AB), and both clinically evident and occult tumors.

RESULTS

Precordial and AB gamma counts showed an excellent linear correlation. HuCC49DeltaC(H)2 MAb followed a two-compartment pharmacokinetic model. Normal organs and AB showed similar exposures to HuCC49DeltaC(H)2 MAb, while HuCC49DeltaC(H)2 MAb favorably distributed into tumors from day 3. Intestinal and metastatic liver lesions showed the highest partition coefficients. All patients showed no HAMA response.

DISCUSSION

C(H)2 region deletion of HuCC49DeltaC(H)2 MAb did not alter the pharmacokinetics compared to murine CC49. The favorable partition coefficient K of HuCC49DeltaC(H)2 MAb into tumors supports its use in RIGS.

Intestinal ischemia and reperfusion injury in transgenic mice overexpressing copper-zinc superoxide dismutase

Superoxide dismutase (SOD) scavenges oxygen radicals that are implicated in the pathogenesis of intestinal ischemia-reperfusion injury. The effect of intestinal ischemia and reperfusion was investigated in transgenic mice overexpressing human Cu-Zn SOD. Ischemia was induced by occluding the superior mesenteric artery. Myeloperoxidase activity was determined as an index of neutrophil infiltration, and malondialdehyde levels were measured as an indicator of lipid peroxidation. Forty-five minutes of intestinal ischemia followed by 4 h of reperfusion caused an increase in intestinal levels of malondialdehyde in both nontransgenic and transgenic mice, but the concentration of malondialdehyde was significantly greater in nontransgenic mice. Intestinal ischemia-reperfusion also caused an increase in intestinal and pulmonary myeloperoxidase activity in nontransgenic and transgenic mice, but the transgenic mice had significantly lower levels of myeloperoxidase activity than nontransgenic mice. Transgenic mice had higher levels of intestinal SOD activity than nontransgenic mice. There were no significant differences in the catalase or glutathione peroxidase activities. In conclusion, our study demonstrates that the overexpression of SOD protects tissues from neutrophil infiltration and lipid peroxidation during intestinal ischemia-reperfusion.