Bioequivalence Between a New Omalizumab Prefilled Syringe With an Autoinjector or with a Needle Safety Device Compared with the Current Prefilled Syringe: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Healthy Volunteers

Omalizumab is an anti-IgE monoclonal antibody currently approved for the treatment of asthma, nasal polyps/chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, and chronic spontaneous urticaria. Omalizumab is available as an injection in a prefilled syringe (PFS) with a needle safety device (NSD). New product configurations were developed to reduce the number of injections per dose administration, improve patient convenience and treatment compliance. The objective of this randomized open-label 12-week study was to demonstrate pharmacokinetic bioequivalence between (1) new PFS with autoinjector (PFS-AI), (2) new PFS-NSD configuration, and (3) current PFS-NSD configuration. Each new configuration was considered bioequivalent to the current configuration if the confidence intervals (CIs) for the geometric mean ratios (GMR) were contained in the 0.80-1.25 range for maximum concentration (Cmax ), area under the concentration-time curve until the last quantifiable measurement (AUClast ), and AUC extrapolated to infinity (AUCinf ). Safety was assessed throughout the study. In total, 193 healthy volunteers were randomized at 1:1:1 ratio to omalizumab 1×300 mg/2 mL via new PFS-AI (n = 66), omalizumab 1×300 mg/2 mL via new PFS-NSD (n = 64), or omalizumab 2×150 mg/1 mL via current PFS-NSD (n = 63). Comparing new PFS-AI versus current PFS-NSD, the GMRs were: Cmax , 1.085; AUClast , 1.093; AUCinf , 1.100. Comparing new PFS-NSD versus current PFS-NSD, the GMRs were: Cmax , 1.006; AUClast , 1.016; AUCinf , 1.027. The 95% CIs for all GMR parameters were contained within the 0.80-1.25 range. Safety findings were consistent with the known safety profile of omalizumab. Single-dose omalizumab administered as the new PFS-AI or new PFS-NSD was bioequivalent to the current PFS-NSD.

Efficacy and safety of ligelizumab in adults and adolescents with chronic spontaneous urticaria: results of two phase 3 randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Many patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) do not achieve complete control of their symptoms with current available treatments. In a dose-finding phase 2b study, ligelizumab improved urticaria symptoms in patients with H1-antihistamine (H1-AH) refractory CSU. Here, we report the efficacy and safety outcomes from two ligelizumab phase 3 studies.

METHODS

PEARL-1 and PEARL-2 were identically designed randomised, double-blind, active-controlled and placebo-controlled parallel-group studies. Patients aged 12 years or older with moderate-to-severe H1-AH refractory CSU were recruited from 347 sites in 46 countries and randomly allocated in a 3:3:3:1 ratio via Interactive Response Technology to 72 mg ligelizumab, 120 mg ligelizumab, 300 mg omalizumab, or placebo, dosed every 4 weeks, for 52 weeks. Patients allocated to placebo received 120 mg ligelizumab from week 24. The primary endpoint was change-from-baseline (CFB) in weekly Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7) at week 12, and was analysed in all eligible adult patients according to the treatment assigned at random allocation. Safety was assessed throughout the study in all patients who received at least one dose of the study drug. The studies were registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03580369 (PEARL-1) and NCT03580356 (PEARL-2). Both trials are now complete.

FINDINGS

Between Oct 17, 2018, and Oct 26, 2021, 2057 adult patients were randomly allocated across both studies (72 mg ligelizumab n=614; 120 mg ligelizumab n=616; 300 mg omalizumab n=618, and placebo n=209). A total of 1480 (72%) of 2057 were female, and 577 (28%) of 2057 were male. Mean UAS7 at baseline across study groups ranged from 29·37 to 31·10. At week 12, estimated treatment differences in mean CFB-UAS7 were as follows: for 72 mg ligelizumab versus placebo, -8·0 (95% CI -10·6 to -5·4; PEARL-1), -10·0 (-12·6 to -7·4; PEARL-2); 72 mg ligelizumab versus omalizumab 0·7 (-1·2 to 2·5; PEARL-1), 0·4 (-1·4 to 2·2; PEARL-2); 120 mg ligelizumab versus placebo -8·0 (-10·5 to -5·4; PEARL-1), -11·1 (-13·7 to -8·5; PEARL-2); 120 mg ligelizumab versus omalizumab 0·7 (-1·1 to 2·5; PEARL-1), -0·7 (-2·5 to 1·1; PEARL-2). Both doses of ligelizumab were superior to placebo (p<0·0001), but not to omalizumab, in both studies. No new safety signals were identified for ligelizumab or omalizumab.

INTERPRETATION

In the phase 3 PEARL studies, ligelizumab demonstrated superior efficacy versus placebo but not versus omalizumab. The safety profile of ligelizumab was consistent with previous studies.

FUNDING

Novartis Pharma.

Global prevalence of Rett syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Rett syndrome is a rare, severe neurodevelopmental disorder. Almost all cases occur in girls, in association with spontaneous (non-inherited) mutations involving the methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 gene located on the X chromosome. Diagnostic criteria for typical Rett syndrome require a period of regression, followed by recovery or stabilization, and fulfillment of all four main criteria (loss of purposeful hand skills, loss of spoken language, gait abnormalities, and stereotypic hand movements). Our objective was to estimate the prevalence of Rett syndrome in the general population, stratified by sex.

METHODS

We conducted a search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, LILACS, and LIVIVO to retrieve studies published in English between Jan. 1, 2000, and June 30, 2021. Pooled prevalence with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was estimated using a random-effects meta-analysis based on a generalized linear mixed model with a logit link.

RESULTS

Ten eligible studies were identified (all in females), with a combined sample size of 9.57 million women and 673 Rett syndrome cases. The pooled prevalence estimate (random effects) was 7.1 per 100,000 females (95% CI: 4.8, 10.5, heterogeneity p < 0.001). Despite greatly variable precision of estimation, all estimates were compatible with a prevalence range of approximately 5 to 10 cases per 100,000 females based on their respective 95% CIs.

CONCLUSION

These findings may facilitate planning of therapeutic trials in this indication in terms of target sample size and accrual times.

A Review of the Unique Drug Development Strategy of Indacaterol Acetate/Glycopyrronium Bromide/Mometasone Furoate: A First-in-Class, Once-Daily, Single-Inhaler, Fixed-Dose Combination Treatment for Asthma

A novel, once-daily (o.d.), fixed-dose combination (FDC) of indacaterol acetate (IND), glycopyrronium bromide (GLY), and mometasone furoate (MF), delivered by the inhaler Breezhaler^® device, is the first long-acting beta2-adrenergic agonist/long-acting muscarinic antagonist/inhaled corticosteroid (LABA/LAMA/ICS) therapy to be approved for maintenance treatment of asthma in adults inadequately controlled on LABA/ICS. The approval of IND/GLY/MF in the European Union (EU) also included an optional electronic sensor and smartphone (or other suitable device) application, making it the first “digital companion” that can be prescribed with an asthma medication. As a result, the European Medicines Agency included this approval as one of the “outstanding contributions to public health” (for Pneumology/Allergology) in their 2020 highlights report. Alongside IND/GLY/MF, an o.d. LABA/ICS FDC, IND/MF, was also developed and approved. This review outlines the unique strategy used in the accelerated development of IND/GLY/MF that combined various approaches: (1) selecting individual components with established efficacy/safety, (2) bridging doses to optimize efficacy/safety of IND/GLY/MF and IND/MF delivered via the Breezhaler^® device, (3) developing IND/GLY/MF and IND/MF in parallel, and (4) submission for regulatory approval before formal completion of the pivotal phase III studies. IND/GLY/MF and IND/MF were combined in a single-development plan (PLATINUM program), which comprised four phase III studies: QUARTZ and PALLADIUM evaluated IND/MF while IRIDIUM and ARGON evaluated IND/GLY/MF. A unique feature was the inclusion of two LABA/ICS comparators in the pivotal IRIDIUM study—IND/MF as an internal comparator, and high-dose salmeterol xinafoate/fluticasone propionate (SAL/FLU) as a marketed comparator. In the ARGON study, IND/GLY/MF was compared against o.d. tiotropium (via Respimat^®) plus twice-daily (b.i.d.) high-dose SAL/FLU (via Diskus^®). As a result of this development strategy, the development and approval of IND/GLY/MF was accelerated by ca. 4 years as against what would be expected from a traditional approach, novel data were generated, and a unique optional digital companion was approved in the EU.

International Country-Level Trends, Factors, and Disparities in Compassionate Use Access to Unlicensed Products for Patients With Serious Medical Conditions

Importance

Compassionate use (CU) is a treatment option for patients with serious or life-threatening medical conditions that provides access to locally unlicensed medications (generally free of charge) when all available treatment options have been exhausted and enrollment in a clinical trial is not possible.

Objective

To examine the disparity in CU access observed across countries and explore the key driving factors.

Design Settings and Participants

This study analyzed all Novartis CU requests (for individual/named patients and cohort programs) received between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2020, and investigated selected country-specific factors for association with request activity. Data analysis was performed from February 2021 to February 2022.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Country-specific request activity was quantified using request counts and rates per million population and examined in stratified and multivariable analyses (negative-binomial regression) for association with the following covariates: existence of local CU regulations and their public availability, clinical trial activity, population size, and gross domestic product.

Results

During the 36-month observation period, 31 711 CU requests were received from 110 countries, 23 194 (73%) of which came from only 10 high-income countries. All high-income countries combined accounted for 27 612 (87%) of all requests, while lower-middle-income and low-income countries contributed only 1021 (3%). Of all requests, 29 870 (94%) were from countries with CU regulations made publicly available on the internet, and higher request activity was demonstrated in countries conducting more clinical trials. Presence and public availability of CU regulations, population size, gross domestic product, and clinical trial activity were independently associated with the CU request activity in multivariable analysis.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study analyzing Novartis CU requests over a 3-year period, existence and public availability of CU regulations and local clinical trial activity were positively associated with higher CU request rates. The analysis also identified an association between macroeconomic factors and CU request activity, despite the generally free provision of unlicensed therapeutic products. Similar analyses of other comparable experiences are needed to supplement these initial observations. Ultimately, better understanding of factors associated with CU request activity would translate into improved early access to novel lifesaving products for patients with unmet medical needs around the world.

Confidence intervals for exposure-adjusted rate differences in randomized trials

Exposure-adjusted event rate is a quantity often used in clinical trials to describe average event count per unit of person-time. The event count may represent the number of patients experiencing first (incident) event episode, or the total number of event episodes, including recurring events. For inference about difference in the exposure-adjusted rates between interventions, many methods of interval estimation rely on the assumption of Poisson distribution for the event counts. These intervals may suffer from substantial undercoverage both, asymptotically due to extra-Poisson variation, and in the settings with rare events even when the Poisson assumption is satisfied. We review asymptotically robust methods of interval estimation for the rate difference that do not depend on distributional assumptions for the event counts, and propose a modification of one of these methods. The new interval estimator has asymptotically nominal coverage for the rate difference with an arbitrary distribution of event counts, and good finite sample properties, avoiding substantial undercoverage with small samples, rare events, or over-dispersed data. The proposed method can handle covariate adjustment and can be implemented with commonly available software. The method is illustrated using real data on adverse events in a clinical trial.

Cardiovascular safety of mometasone/indacaterol and mometasone/indacaterol/glycopyrronium once-daily fixed-dose combinations in asthma: pooled analysis of phase 3 trials

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate cardiovascular safety of two new inhaled fixed-dose combinations for treatment of asthma: (i) the inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting beta2-agonist (ICS/LABA) mometasone furoate/indacaterol acetate (MF/IND), (ii) the ICS/LABA/long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) MF/IND/glycopyrronium bromide (GLY).

METHODS

Patient-level data were pooled from four randomized trials, including 52-week studies PALLADIUM (n = 2216) and IRIDIUM (n = 3092), 24-week study ARGON (n = 1426), and 12-week study QUARTZ (n = 802). Cardio-/cerebrovascular (CCV) event frequencies were examined in the following comparisons: (1) LABA effect: pooled-dose MF/IND vs. pooled-dose MF; (2) LAMA effect: pooled-dose MF/IND/GLY vs. pooled-dose MF/IND; (3) ICS-dose effects: (a) high-dose MF/IND vs. medium-dose MF/IND, (b) high-dose MF/IND/GLY vs. medium-dose MF/IND/GLY; (4) intra-class effects: (a) high-dose MF/IND vs. Fluticasone/Salmeterol (F/S), (b) high-dose MF/IND/GLY vs. F/S + Tiotropium (TIO). Risk estimates (percentage of patients with ≥1 CCV event) and risk differences (RDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for each comparison.

RESULTS

The frequency of CCV events was low, without notable differences between comparison groups. Risk estimates and corresponding RDs (95% CIs) were as follows: (1) pooled-dose MF/IND = 2.35%, pooled-dose MF = 2.18%, RD = 0.17% (-1.00%, 1.34%); (2) pooled-dose MF/IND/GLY = 3.65%, pooled-dose MF/IND = 3.77%, RD = -0.12% (-1.63%, 1.39%); (3a) high-dose MF/IND = 3.69%, medium-dose MF/IND = 3.35%, RD = 0.34% (-1.25%, 1.94%); (3b) high-dose MF/IND/GLY = 2.84%, medium-dose MF/IND/GLY = 2.02%, RD = 0.82% (-0.49%, 2.13%); (4a) high-dose MF/IND = 3.69%, F/S = 2.82%, RD = 0.87% (-0.66%, 2.40%); (4b) high-dose MF/IND/GLY = 1.26%, F/S + TIO = 1.05%, RD = 0.21% (-1.26%, 1.68%).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no evidence of increased cardiovascular risk attributable to the addition of IND to MF or addition of GLY to MF/IND. Similarly, no evidence of increased cardiovascular risk was observed with an increase in the ICS-dose or relative to F/S ± TIO.

Power analysis for multivariable Cox regression models

In power analysis for multivariable Cox regression models, variance of the estimated log-hazard ratio for the treatment effect is usually approximated by inverting the expected null information matrix. Because, in many typical power analysis settings, assumed true values of the hazard ratios are not necessarily close to unity, the accuracy of this approximation is not theoretically guaranteed. To address this problem, the null variance expression in power calculations can be replaced with one of the alternative expressions derived under the assumed true value of the hazard ratio for the treatment effect. This approach is explored analytically and by simulations in the present paper. We consider several alternative variance expressions and compare their performance to that of the traditional null variance expression. Theoretical analysis and simulations demonstrate that, whereas the null variance expression performs well in many nonnull settings, it can also be very inaccurate, substantially underestimating, or overestimating the true variance in a wide range of realistic scenarios, particularly those where the numbers of treated and control subjects are very different and the true hazard ratio is not close to one. The alternative variance expressions have much better theoretical properties, confirmed in simulations. The most accurate of these expressions has a relatively simple form. It is the sum of inverse expected event counts under treatment and under control scaled up by a variance inflation factor.

Can Disproportionality Analysis of Post-marketing Case Reports be Used for Comparison of Drug Safety Profiles?

Clinical trials usually do not have the power to detect rare adverse drug reactions. Spontaneous adverse reaction reports as for example available in post-marketing safety databases such as the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) are therefore a valuable source of information to detect new safety signals early. To screen such large data-volumes for safety signals, data-mining algorithms based on the concept of disproportionality have been developed. Because disproportionality analysis is based on spontaneous reports submitted for a large number of drugs and adverse event types, one might consider using these data to compare safety profiles across drugs. In fact, recent publications have promoted this practice, claiming to provide guidance on treatment decisions to healthcare decision makers. In this article we investigate the validity of this approach. We argue that disproportionality cannot be used for comparative drug safety analysis beyond basic hypothesis generation because measures of disproportionality are: (1) missing the incidence denominators, (2) subject to severe reporting bias, and (3) not adjusted for confounding. Hypotheses generated by disproportionality analyses must be investigated by more robust methods before they can be allowed to influence clinical decisions.

Exploratory Subgroup Analyses of Renal Function and Overall Survival in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer randomized trial of Nephron-sparing Surgery Versus Radical Nephrectomy

BACKGROUND

In the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) randomized trial 30904, nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) reduced the risk of renal dysfunction compared with radical nephrectomy (RN); however, overall survival was better in the RN arm.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether treatment effect on the risk of renal dysfunction and all-cause mortality differed in magnitude across levels of baseline variables.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This was an exploratory subgroup analysis of EORTC 30904, a phase 3 randomized trial conducted in patients with a small (≤5cm) renal mass and normal contralateral kidney.

INTERVENTION

Patients were randomized to RN (n=273) or NSS (n=268).

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

End points included follow-up estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60ml/min/1.73m², eGFR <45ml/min/1.73m², eGFR <30ml/min/1.73m², and all-cause mortality. Treatment effect was examined within baseline variables: age (<62 vs ≥62 yr), sex, chronic disease (any vs none), performance status (0 vs≥1), and serum creatinine ≤1.25 vs >1.25×upper limit of normal (ULN). Logistic and Cox regression models were used for analysis of renal dysfunction and all-cause mortality, respectively.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

The median follow-up periods were 6.7 yr for eGFR and 9.3 yr for survival. No variable-by-treatment interactions were significant at alpha=0.05. For patients with baseline creatinine >1.25×ULN (n=36), estimated mortality hazard ratio (HR) for NSS versus RN reversed its direction (HR=0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.17-3.39) relative to the rest of the study cohort (HR=1.56, 95% CI: 1.06-2.29), although this reversal was not statistically significant (interaction p=0.25). This analysis was limited by low power.

CONCLUSIONS

This exploratory analysis did not reveal strong evidence of treatment effect modification in EORTC 30904, but it was limited by low power.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We aimed to determine whether the effect of partial versus radical nephrectomy on kidney function and overall survival depended on age, sex, and baseline health of patients enrolled in a large clinical trial. Such dependence could not be demonstrated in this analysis.

Overall Survival after Partial Versus Radical Nephrectomy for a Small Renal Mass: Systematic Review of Observational Studies

INTRODUCTION

In EORTC trial 30904 of partial versus radical nephrectomy overall survival was significantly better in the radical nephrectomy arm. However, many observational studies reported better survival after partial than radical nephrectomy. We present an updated systematic review of observational studies of overall survival after partial versus radical nephrectomy with assessment of quality of evidence.

METHODS

The literature search was performed until December 31, 2013, and all studies reporting overall survival after partial vs radical nephrectomy were included in the initial review. Further inclusion criteria for complete review were malignant tumors 7 cm or smaller, or benign tumors of any size, and survival analysis performed with adjustment for confounding variables. Studies not meeting these criteria were excluded from full review because of selection bias in favor of patients treated with partial nephrectomy who were younger and with less advanced tumors.

RESULTS

A total of 34 studies were included in the initial review and 13 were included in the full review. The 13 studies were based on the SEER database (6) or on institutional cohorts (7). In 8 of the 13 studies the estimated hazard ratios were significantly below 1, indicating better overall survival after partial nephrectomy, while in the remaining 5 studies estimated HR was not significantly different from 1. Median HR was 0.80 (interquartile range 0.57 to 0.96, absolute range 0.40 to 1.10).

CONCLUSIONS

In most observational studies overall survival was better after partial than after radical nephrectomy. However, because residual confounding could be present despite adjustment for measured covariates, another randomized trial of partial vs radical nephrectomy may be needed to confirm or refute the findings of EORTC 30904.

Sex differences in incidence and mortality of bladder and kidney cancers: national estimates from 49 countries

OBJECTIVES

In the United States, among patients diagnosed with bladder cancer (BC), women have increased disease-specific mortality compared with men. The main objective of this study was to determine whether this pattern is also present in other countries. For comparison, similar analyses were performed for kidney cancer (KC).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Data for this study were obtained from the GLOBOCAN 2008 database. A total of 49 countries with available information on BC and KC incidence and mortality were included in the analysis, representing all major geographic regions except Africa. For each country, we computed the sex-specific ratio of the total number of deaths from a given cancer to the total number of diagnoses in the year 2008 (the mortality-to-incidence ratio [MIR]). The relative MIR was computed for each country as a ratio of MIR in women to MIR in men. A relative MIR of more than 1 would indicate that the number of cancer-specific deaths relative to the number of cancer-specific diagnoses is greater in women than in men.

RESULTS

For BC, the relative MIRs were significantly more than 1 in 26 countries (53%), significantly less than 1 in 2 countries (4%), and not significantly different from 1 in 21 countries (43%). The median relative MIR was 1.21 (interquartile range: 1.04-1.41). For KC, the relative MIRs were significantly more than 1 in 4 countries (8%), significantly less than 1 in 3 countries (6%), and not significantly different from 1 in 42 countries (86%). The median relative MIR was 1.00 (interquartile range: 0.94-1.06).

CONCLUSION

Among BC patients, increased disease-specific mortality in women compared with men appears to be a common (although not a universal) phenomenon. This pattern may potentially be explained by differences between the sexes in the biology of disease, time to diagnosis, treatment decisions, and other factors. In contrast, among KC patients, no significant differences in disease-specific mortality were seen between the 2 sexes in the overwhelming majority of the countries.

A randomized trial of 2% lidocaine gel versus plain lubricating gel for minimizing pain in men undergoing flexible cystoscopy

This article presents findings from a randomized trial of intra-urethral lidocaine versus a plain lubricating gel for pain reduction in men undergoing flexible cystoscopy. Compared with the plain gel, use of lidocaine resulted in significantly less pain during the procedure.

Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables in randomized trials with stochastic compliance

In randomized trials with imperfect compliance, it is sometimes recommended to supplement the intention-to-treat estimate with an instrumental variable (IV) estimate, which is consistent for the effect of treatment administration in those subjects who would get treated if randomized to treatment and would not get treated if randomized to control. The IV estimation however has been criticized for its reliance on simultaneous existence of complementary "fatalistic" compliance states. The objective of the present paper is to identify some sufficient conditions for consistent estimation of treatment effects in randomized trials with stochastic compliance. It is shown that in the stochastic framework, the classical IV estimator is generally inconsistent for the population-averaged treatment effect. However, even under stochastic compliance, with certain common experimental designs the IV estimator and a simple alternative estimator can be used for consistent estimation of the effect of treatment administration in well-defined and identifiable subsets of the study population.

Statin use and the risk of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after definitive local therapy: a meta-analysis of eight cohort studies

What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Over the last few years, several observational studies examined the association of statin use with the risk of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after definitive local therapy. The objective of our present study was to summarise available evidence on this subject using the method of meta-analysis. Combined evidence from eight cohort studies did not definitively support the hypothesis that statins influence the risk of biochemical recurrence. However, there was considerable disagreement between individual studies in reported findings and conclusions.

OBJECTIVE

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies with statin use as the exposure variable and biochemical recurrence after definitive local therapy for prostate cancer as the outcome.

METHODS

Relevant publications were identified through PubMed/Medline/Embase databases. Pooled estimates of the hazard ratios (HRs) were computed using the inverse-variance weighting approach. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochran's Q test.

RESULTS

We identified a total of eight eligible studies, all based on the retrospective cohort design. Five of these were based on radical prostatectomy (RP) series and three on radiotherapy (RT) series. There was evidence of heterogeneity in the entire set of eight studies (P = 0.002) as well as in the RP series (P = 0.05) and in the RT series (P = 0.01), when these were considered separately. Based on the random effects inverse-variance weighting approach, pooled estimates of the HRs for the risk of biochemical recurrence in statin users v non-users were 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72-1.13) for the entire set of eight studies, 1.02 (95% CI 0.80-1.29) for the RP series and 0.71 (95% CI 0.44-1.16) for the RT series.

CONCLUSION

The pooled estimates of the HRs were not significantly different from the null value in this meta-analysis; however, evidence of heterogeneity between the studies was present.

Prostate cancer in the elderly: frequency of advanced disease at presentation and disease-specific mortality

BACKGROUND

The objectives of this study were to determine the frequency of metastatic (M1) prostate cancer (PC) at presentation in different age groups, to examine the association of age with PC-specific mortality, and to calculate the relative contribution of different age groups to the pool of M1 cases and PC deaths.

METHODS

Records from 464,918 patients who were diagnosed with PC from 1998 to 2007 were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The patients were categorized according to age into groups ages <50 years, 50 to 54 years, 55 to 59 years, 60 to 64 years, 65 to 69 years, 70 to 74 years, 75 to 79 years, 80 to 84 years, 85 to 89 years, and ≥ 90 years. The cumulative incidence of death from PC was computed using the Gray method.

RESULTS

The frequency of M1 PC at presentation was 3% for the group aged <75 years, 5% for the group ages 75 to 79 years, 8% for the group ages 80 to 84 years, 13% for the group ages 85 to 89 years, and 17% for the group aged ≥ 90 years. The 5-year cumulative incidence of death from PC was 3% to 4% for all patients with PC in any category aged <75 years, 7% for patients ages 75 to 79 years, 13% for patients ages 80 to 84 years, 20% for patients ages 85 to 89 years, and 30% for patients aged ≥ 90 years. Although patients aged ≥ 75 years at PC diagnosis represented just over a quarter (26%) of all PC cases, they contributed almost half (48%) of all M1 cases and more than half (53%) of all PC deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with younger patients (aged <75 years), older patients were more likely to present with very advanced disease, had a greater risk of death from PC despite higher death rates from competing causes, and contributed more than half of all PC deaths. Awareness of this issue may improve future outcomes for elderly patients with PC.

Do mixed histological features affect survival benefit from neoadjuvant platinum-based combination chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced bladder cancer? A secondary analysis of Southwest Oncology Group-Directed Intergroup Study (S8710)

OBJECTIVE

• To determine whether the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin (MVAC) on the survival of patients with locally advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) of the bladder treated with radical cystectomy varies with the presence of non-urothelial components in the tumour.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• This is a secondary analysis of the Southwest Oncology Group-directed intergroup randomized trial S8710 of neoadjuvant MVAC followed by cystectomy versus cystectomy alone for treatment of locally advanced UC of the bladder. • For the purpose of these analyses, tumours were classified based on the presence of non-urothelial components as either pure UC (n= 236) or mixed tumours (n= 59). Non-urothelial components included squamous and glandular differentiation. • Cox regression models were used to estimate the effect of neoadjuvant MVAC on all-cause mortality for patients with pure UC and for patients with mixed tumours, with adjustment for age and clinical stage.

RESULTS

• There was evidence of a survival benefit from chemotherapy in patients with mixed tumours (hazard ratio 0.46; 95% CI 0.25-0.87; P= 0.02). Patients with pure UC had improved survival on the chemotherapy arm but the survival benefit was not statistically significant (hazard ratio 0.90; 95% CI 0.67-1.21; P= 0.48). • There was marginal evidence that the survival benefit of chemotherapy in patients with mixed tumours was greater than it was for patients with pure UC (interaction P= 0.09).

CONCLUSION

• Presence of squamous or glandular differentiation in locally advanced UC of the bladder does not confer resistance to MVAC and in fact may be an indication for the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radical cystectomy.

Neoadjuvant gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy for locally advanced urothelial cancer of the bladder

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) on pathologic down-staging of patients with locally advanced urothelial cancer (UC) of the bladder.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients treated with radical cystectomy (RC) for clinical stage cT2-T4, N any, M0 bladder UC at Strong Memorial Hospital from 1999 to 2009. The primary exposure variable was use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (GC vs none). The primary outcome was stage pT0 at RC. Secondary outcomes included other down-staging end points in the bladder (<pT1, <pT2, <pT3), nodal status, and surgical margins. Linear probability models were used to estimate the effect of neoadjuvant GC on tumor down-staging with adjustment for clinical staging variables.

RESULTS

A total of 160 eligible patients were identified, of whom 25 were treated with neoadjuvant GC before RC (GC + RC) and 135 without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (RC only). Stage pT0 at cystectomy was found in 20% of patients in the GC + RC group and in 5% of patients in the RC group (adjusted risk difference [aRD] = 16%, P = .03). For other down-staging end points, the estimated treatment effect was as follows (all point estimates favoring chemotherapy): <pT1 aRD = 30% (P = .005); <pT2 aRD = 30% (P = .004); <pT3 aRD = 31% (P = .008); margins aRD = 8% (P = .41); nodes aRD = 4% (P = .74).

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant GC was found to be capable of down-staging UC in the bladder; however, no effect on disease in nodes was seen in this study.

Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program and population-based research in urologic oncology: an overview

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program is a commonly used data source in cancer research. This article provides an introduction to the SEER database, describes important data items available from SEER on the most commonly diagnosed urologic malignancies (prostate, bladder, and kidney cancers), and reviews limitations of SEER data for urologic oncology research.

Sex and racial differences in bladder cancer presentation and mortality in the US

BACKGROUND

Sex, race, and age at diagnosis have a significant impact on mortality from bladder cancer (BC). Women, African Americans of both sexes, and the elderly, all experience higher mortality rates. Tumor grade, stage, and histologic type at presentation also affect outcome. To determine whether age and tumor characteristics alone explain the excess hazard of death from BC observed in some demographic groups, the authors queried the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) limited-use database for the presentations and outcomes from BC between 1990 and 2005.

METHODS

Tumors were characterized by grade, stage, and histologic type. Hazards rates for BC-specific mortality were compared by race and sex using a piecewise Cox regression model, adjusting for factors (age, stage, grade, and histologic type) that differed significantly between the groups that were compared.

RESULTS

Excess hazard of death from BC was present during the first 2 to 3 years of follow-up among women and during the first 4 years of follow-up among African Americans. Adjustment for age and tumor characteristics eliminated approximately 30% of this excess hazard in sex comparison among whites. In sex comparison among blacks and in racial comparisons within each sex, approximately 50% to 70% of excess hazard could be eliminated by adjustment.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant differences in tumor characteristics and age at presentation did not fully account for the excess hazard of death from BC among women and African Americans. Other factors, such as choice and efficacy of therapies, differences within a given tumor characteristic group, and/or host factors also may play important roles.

An overview of the human immunodeficiency virus featuring laboratory testing for drug resistance

The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) pandemic is unique in human history in its rapid spread, its persistence, and the depth of its impact. The Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) estimates that approximately 65 million people have been infected with HIV since the beginning of the epidemic. During this time, approximately 25 million people have died from acquired immune deficiency syndrome AIDS. HIV-associated morbidity and mortality was substantially reduced during the last decade following the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). In spite of the striking success of HAART in treating HIV infection, many patients experience treatment failure as genetic changes emerge in the virus leading to drug resistance. Laboratory testing for drug resistance in HIV strains is now used in combination with other methods to guide antiretroviral therapy. The purpose of this report is to review the background information on HIV with the focus on the problem of drug resistance and to describe the laboratory methods of testing for drug resistance in HIV strains.