Improved nationwide survival of sarcoma patients with a network of reference centers

BACKGROUND

We investigated the impact of the implementation of a network of reference centers for sarcomas (NETSARC) on the care and survival of sarcoma patients in France since 2010.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

NETSARC (netsarc.org) is a network of 26 reference sarcoma centers with specialized multidisciplinary tumor boards (MDTBs), funded by the French National Cancer Institute (INCa) since 2010. Its aims are to improve the quality of diagnosis and care of sarcoma patients. Patients' characteristics, treatments, and outcomes are collected in a nationwide database. The objective of this analysis was to compare the survival of patients in three periods: 2010-2012 (non-exhaustive), 2013-2015, and 2016-2020.

RESULTS

A total of 43 975 patients with sarcomas, gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), or connective tissue tumors of intermediate malignancy were included in the NETSARC+ database since 2010 (n = 9266 before 2013, n = 12 274 between 2013 and 2015, n = 22 435 in 2016-2020). Median age was 56 years, 50.5% were women, and 13.2% had metastasis at diagnosis. Overall survival was significantly superior in the period 2016-2020 versus 2013-2015 versus 2010-2012 for the entire population, for patients >18 years of age, and for both metastatic and non-metastatic patients in univariate and multivariate analyses (P < 0.0001). Over the three periods, we observed a significantly improved compliance to clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) nationwide: the proportion of patients biopsied before surgery increased from 62.9% to 72.6%; the percentage of patients presented to NETSARC MDTBs before first surgery increased from 31.7% to 44.4% (P < 0.0001). The proportion of patients with R0 resection on first surgery increased (from 36.1% to 46.6%), while R2 resection rate decreased (from 10.9% to 7.9%), with a better compliance and improvement in NETSARC centers.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of the national reference network for sarcoma was associated with an improvement of overall survival and compliance to guidelines nationwide in sarcoma patients. Referral to expert networks for sarcoma patients should be encouraged, though a better compliance to CPGs can still be achieved.

PEC-PRO: A new prognostic score from a series of 87 patients with localized perivascular epithelioid cell neoplasms (PEComas) treated with curative intent

BACKGROUND

Perivascular epithelioid cell neoplasms (PEComas) encompass a heterogeneous family of mesenchymal tumors. Previously described clinicopathologic features aimed at distinguishing benign from malignant variants but lacked prognostic value.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis examined clinicopathologic data from patients who had localized PEComa across French Sarcoma Network centers. The authors analyzed 12 clinicopathologic features in a Cox proportional hazard framework to derive a multivariate prognostic risk model for event-free survival (EFS). They built the PEComa prognostic score (PEC-PRO), in which scores ranged from 0 to 5, based on the coefficients of the multivariate model. Three groups were identified: low risk (score = 0), intermediate risk (score = 1), and high risk (score ≥ 2).

RESULTS

Analyzing 87 patients who had a median 46-month follow-up (interquartile range, 20-74 months), the median EFS was 96.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 47.1 months to not applicable), with 2-year and 5-year EFS rates of 64.7% and 58%, respectively. The median overall survival was unreached, with 2-year and 5-year overall survival rates of 82.3% and 69.3%, respectively. The simplified Folpe classification did not correlate with EFS. Multivariate analysis identified three factors affecting EFS: positive surgical margins (hazard ratio [HR], 5.17; 95% CI, 1.65-16.24; p = .008), necrosis (HR, 3.94; 95% CI, 1.16-13.43; p = .030), and male sex (HR, 3.13; 95% CI, 1.19-8.27; p = 0.023). Four variables were retained in the prognostic model. Patients with low-risk PEC-PRO scores had a 2-year EFS rate of 93.7% (95% CI, 83.8%-100.0%), those with intermediate-risk PEC-PRO scores had a 2-year EFS rate of 67.4% (95% CI, 53.9%-80.9%), and those with high-risk PEC-PRO scores had a 2-year EFS rate of 2.3% (95% CI, 0.0%-18.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

The PEC-PRO score reliably predicts the risk of postoperative recurrence in patients with localized PEComa. It has the potential to improve follow-up strategies but requires validation in a prospective trial.

A Randomized, Open-label, Cross-over Phase 2 Trial of Darolutamide and Enzalutamide in Men with Asymptomatic or Mildly Symptomatic Metastatic Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer: Patient Preference and Cognitive Function in ODENZA

BACKGROUND

Darolutamide and enzalutamide are second-generation androgen receptor inhibitors with activity in men with castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and different toxicity profiles.

OBJECTIVE

ODENZA is a prospective, randomized, multicenter, cross-over, phase 2 trial designed to assess preference between darolutamide and enzalutamide in men with asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic metastatic CRPC (mCRPC).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either darolutamide 1200 mg/d for 12 wk followed by enzalutamide 160 mg/d for 12 wk or enzalutamide followed by darolutamide. In both arms, the second treatment was given in absence of cancer progression.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The primary endpoint was patient preference between the two drugs, as assessed by a preference questionnaire (p value calculated with the Prescott test). After week 24, patients entered an extension period during which they received their preferred treatment until progression or toxicity. The main secondary objectives included reasons for patient preference, response at week 12, tolerance of each drug, and measurement compared with baseline of cognitive outcomes assessed using tablet questionnaires.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Overall, 249 patients, with a median age of 72 yr, were randomized. Among the 200 patients who fulfilled the preplanned criteria for the evaluation of the primary endpoint of preference, 97 (49% [41; 56]), 80 (40% [33; 47]), and 23 (12% [7; 16]) chose darolutamide, chose enzalutamide, and had no preference, respectively (p = 0.92). Reduced fatigue, easier administration, and better quality of life were the main criteria that influenced patient choice. A moderate benefit in episodic memory from darolutamide was observed for the acquisition of new information (least square [LS] means difference = 2.2, effect size = 0.5) and for the recall of that information after a brief delay (LS means difference = 0.7, effect size = 0.3). Using the Brief Fatigue Inventory questionnaire, patients reported greater fatigue with enzalutamide (3.3 [3.0; 3.6]) than with darolutamide (2.7 [2.4; 3.0]). There was no difference in terms of depression, seizures, and falls.

CONCLUSIONS

The study did not show a difference in preference between the two treatments. In men with mCRPC, darolutamide was associated with a clinically meaningful benefit in episodic memory and less fatigue compared with enzalutamide.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Preference between darolutamide and enzalutamide was well balanced in men with castrate-resistant prostate cancer. Darolutamide was associated with a significant benefit in verbal learning and less fatigue compared with enzalutamide.

Sclerosing Epithelioid Fibrosarcoma (SEF) versus Low Grade Fibromyxoid Sarcoma (LGFMS): Presentation and outcome in the nationwide NETSARC+ series of 330 patients over 13 years

Sclerosing Epithelioid Fibrosarcoma (SEF) and Low Grade Fibromyxoid Sarcoma (LGFMS) are ultrarare sarcomas sharing common translocations whose natural history are not well known. We report on the nationwide exhaustive series of 330 patients with SEF or LGFMS in NETSARC+ since 2010.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

NETSARC (netsarc.org) is a network of 26 reference sarcoma centers with specialized multidisciplinary tumor boards (MDTB). Since 2010, (i) pathological review has been mandatory for sarcoma,and (ii) tumour/patients' characteristics have been collected in the NETSARC+ nationwide database. The characteristics of patients with SEF and LGFMS and their outcome are compared.

RESULTS

35/73 (48%) and 125/257(49%) of patients with SEF and LGFMS were female. More visceral, bone and trunk primary sites were observed in SEF (p < 0.001). 30% of SEF vs 4% of LGFMS patients had metastasis at diagnosis (p < 0.0001). Median size of the primary tumor was 51 mm (range 10-90) for LGFMS vs 80 (20-320) for SEF (p < 0.001). Median age for LGFMS patients was 12 years younger than that of SEF patients (43 [range 4-98] vs 55 [range 10-91], p < 0.001). Neoadjuvant treatment was more often given to SEF (16% vs 9%, p = 0.05). More patients with LGFMS were operated first in reference centers (51% vs 26%, p < 0.001). The R0 rate on the operative specimen was 41% in LGFMS vs 16% in SEF (p < 0.001). Median event-free survival (EFS) of patients with SEF and LGFMS were 32 vs 136 months (p < 0.0001). The median overall survival (OS) was not reached. Fifty-months OS was 93% vs 81% for LGFMS vs SEF (p = 0.05). Median OS was 77 months after first relapse, similar for SEF and LGFMS. In multivariate analysis, age, tumor size, metastasis at diagnosis were independent prognostic factors for OS in LGFMS.

CONCLUSIONS

Although sharing close molecular alterations, SEF and LGFMS have a different natural history, clinical presentation and outcome, with a higher risk of metastatic relapse in SEF. Survival after relapse is longer than with other sarcomas, and similar for SEF and LGFMS.

Regorafenib in patients with advanced Ewing sarcoma: results of a non-comparative, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre Phase II study

BACKGROUND

The REGOBONE multi-cohort study explored the efficacy and safety of regorafenib for patients with advanced bone sarcomas; this report details the Ewing sarcoma (ES) cohort.

METHODS

Patients with relapsed ES progressing despite prior standard therapy, were randomised (2:1) to receive regorafenib or placebo. Patients on placebo could crossover to receive regorafenib after centrally confirmed progression. The primary endpoint was the progression-free rate at 8 weeks. With one-sided α of 0.05, and 80% power, at least 14/24 progression-free patients at 8 weeks were needed for success.

RESULTS

From September 2014 to November 2019, 41 patients were accrued. 36 patients were evaluable for efficacy: 23 on regorafenib and 13 on placebo. Thirteen patients (56%; one-sided 95% CI [37.5%-[)) were progression-free at 8 weeks on regorafenib vs. 1 (7.7%; 95% CI [0.4%-[) on placebo. Median PFS was 11.4 weeks on regorafenib, and 3.9 weeks on placebo. Ten placebo patients crossed over to receive regorafenib after progression. The most common grade ≥3 regorafenib-related adverse events were pain (22%), asthenia (17%), thrombocytopenia (13%) and diarrhoea (13%).

CONCLUSION

Although the primary endpoint was not met statistically in this randomised cohort, there is evidence to suggest that regorafenib might modestly delay tumour progression in relapsed ES after failure of prior chemotherapy.

Epithelioid hemangio-endothelioma (EHE) in NETSARC: The nationwide series of 267 patients over 12 years

EPITHELIOID HEMANGIOENDOTHELIOMA

A NATIONWIDE STUDY: Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) is an ultrarare sarcoma whose natural history and treatment is not well defined. We report on the presentation and outcome of 267 patients with EHE in the NETSARC+ network since 2010 in France.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

NETSARC (netsarc.org) is a network of 26 reference sarcoma centres with specialised multidisciplinary tumour boards (MDTB), funded by the French National Cancer Institute (NCI), Institut National du Cancer (INCA). Since 2010, presentation to an MDTB and second pathological review are mandatory for sarcoma patients. Patients' characteristics are collected in a nationwide database regularly monitored with stable incidence since 2013. The characteristics of patients with EHE at diagnosis are presented as well as progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and outcome under treatment.

RESULTS

Two hundred and sixty-seven patients with EHE were included in the NETSARC+ database since 2010. Median age in the series was 51 (range 10-90) years, 58% were women. Median tumour size was 37 mm (4-220). Forty-eight percent, 42%, and 10% were visceral, soft parts, or bone primaries. The most frequent sites were liver (28%), lung (13%). 40% were reported to have systemic (i.e. multifocal or metastatic disease) at diagnosis. With a median follow-up of 20 months, OS and PFS rates at 24 months were 82% and 67%, with 10-year projected OS and PFS of 62% and 21% respectively. Male and M+ patients at diagnosis had a significantly worse OS, but not PFS. Local treatment was associated with a favourable survival in localised but not in patients with advanced stage at diagnosis. For 23 patients receiving medical treatment, PFS and OS were 50.2% and 33.2% at 60 months were respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

EHE is a frequently metastatic sarcoma at diagnosis with a unique natural history. This study shows in a nationwide series over 12 years that most patients progressed but are still alive at 10 years, both in localised and metastatic stages.

Pembrolizumab in patients with rare and ultra-rare sarcomas (AcSé Pembrolizumab): analysis of a subgroup from a non-randomised, open-label, phase 2, basket trial

BACKGROUND

Sarcoma is a heterogeneous group of diseases with few treatment options. Immunotherapy has shown little activity in studies including unselected sarcomas, but immune checkpoint blockers have shown activity in specific histotypes. We evaluated the activity of pembrolizumab in rare and ultra-rare sarcomas.

METHODS

AcSé Pembrolizumab is an ongoing phase 2, basket, multitumour study investigating the activity of pembrolizumab monotherapy in rare cancers. Here, we report the results obtained in patients with selected histotypes of rare sarcomas (incidence of less than one case per 1 000 000 people per year) recruited at 24 French hospitals. Key inclusion criteria were age 15 years or older, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, and advanced disease that was untreated and resistant to treatment. Patients were given pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously on day 1 of every 21-day cycle for a maximum of 24 months. The primary endpoint was objective response rate at week 12 using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1, assessed by local investigators. The primary endpoint and safety were analysed in the intention-to-treat population. The AcSé Pembrolizumab study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03012620.

FINDINGS

Between Sept 4, 2017, and Dec 29, 2020, 98 patients were enrolled, of whom 97 received treatment and were included in analyses (median age 51 years [IQR 35-65]; 53 [55%] were male; 44 [45%] were female; no data were collected on race or ethnicity). 34 (35%) patients had chordomas, 14 (14%) had alveolar soft part sarcomas, 12 (12%) had SMARCA4-deficient sarcomas or malignant rhabdoid tumours, eight (8%) had desmoplastic small round cell tumours, six (6%) had epithelioid sarcomas, four (4%) had dendritic cell sarcomas, three (3%) each had clear cell sarcomas, solitary fibrous tumours, and myxoid liposarcomas, and ten (10%) had other ultra-rare histotypes. As of data cutoff (April 11, 2022), median follow-up was 13·1 months (range 0·1-52·8; IQR 4·3-19·7). At week 12, objective response rate was 6·2% (95% CI 2·3-13·0), with no complete responses and six partial responses in the 97 patients. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were anaemia (eight [8%] of 97), alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase increase (six [6%]), and dyspnoea (five [5%]). 86 serious adverse events were reported in 37 patients. Five deaths due to adverse events were reported, none of which were determined to be related to treatment (two due to disease progression, two due to cancer, and one due to unknown cause).

INTERPRETATION

Our data show the activity and manageable toxicity of pembrolizumab in some rare and ultra-rare sarcoma histotypes, and support the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway as a potential therapeutic target in selected histotypes. The completion of the basket study will provide further evidence regarding the activity and toxicity of pembrolizumab in identified rare types of cancer.

FUNDING

The Ligue contre le cancer, INCa, MSD.

TRANSLATION

For the French translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Late toxicity comparison of alkylating-based maintenance regimen with cyclophosphamide (VAC) vs ifosfamide (VAI) in Ewing sarcoma survivors treated in the randomized clinical trial Euro-EWING99-R1 in France

In Euro-EWING99-R1 randomized trial, cyclophosphamide was shown to be noninferior to ifosfamide in the consolidation of standard-risk Ewing sarcoma (SR-EWS) after a common induction with VIDE (vincristine-ifosfamide-doxorubicin-etoposide). We present the results of the late effects analysis of VAC (vincristine-dactinomycin-cyclophoshamide) vs VAI (vincristine-dactinomycin-ifosfamide) conducted in Euro-EWING99-R1 French cohort. Of 267 French randomized patients, 204 were alive and free-of-relapse at 5-years including 172 with available long-term follow-up data concerning cardiac, renal and/or gonadal functions (sex-ratio M/F = 1.3, median age at diagnosis = 14 years): 84 randomized in VAC (median cumulative doses: cyclophosphamide = 9.7 g/m² , ifosfamide = 59.4 g/m² ) and 88 in VAI (ifosfamide = 97.1 g/m² ). With a median follow-up of 10 years (range = 5-17), five late relapses and five second malignancies were recorded. The 10-year event-free survival among 5-year free-of-relapse survivors was similar between VAC and VAI (93% vs 95%, P = .63). We estimated the 10-year cumulative probabilities of cardiac and kidney toxicities at 4.4% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 1.1%-7.6%) and 34.8% (95% CI = 26.8%-42.0%), respectively. Cardiac toxicity cumulative probability was similar in both arms, whereas kidney toxicity was higher in VAI (at 10 years, 43.0% vs 25.7%, P = .02), resulting from significant difference in glomerular toxicity (31.1% vs 13.1%, P < .01). At 10 years, gonadal toxicity was observed in 27% and 28% of pubertal men and women, respectively, without significant difference between VAC and VAI. Kidney and gonadal toxicities represent major issues in Euro-EWING99-R1, with significantly higher risk of kidney toxicities with VAI, without significant gonadal toxicity reduction. These results support the need to limit cumulative doses of both alkylating agents and to use mixed regimen as in VIDE-VAC or VDC/IE (vincristine-doxorubicin-cyclophoshamide/ifosfamide-etoposide).

Sarcomes du stroma endométrial de bas grade : référentiels de prise en charge du GSF-GETO/NETSARC+ et du groupe TMRG

Low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS) accounts for approximately 15% of all uterine sarcomas. Median age of patients is around 50 years and half of the patients are premenopausal. In all, 60% of cases present with FIGO stage I disease. Preoperatively radiologic findings of ESS are not specific. Pathological diagnosis remains essential. This review aimed to present the French guidelines for low grade ESS treatment within the Groupe sarcome français - Groupe d'étude des tumeurs osseuse (GSF-GETO)/NETSARC+ and tumeur maligne rare gynécologique (TMRG) networks. Treatments should be validated in multidisciplinary team involved in sarcomas or rare gynecologic tumors. Hysterectomy is the cornerstone of treatment for localized ESS, and morcellation should be avoided. Systematic lymphadenectomy in ESS does not improve the outcome and is not recommended. Leaving the ovaries in situ in stage I tumors could be discussed for young women. Adjuvant hormonal treatment could be considered, for two years for stage I with morcellation or stage II and livelong for stages III or IV. Nevertheless, several questions remain, such as optimal doses, regimens (progestins or aromatase inhibitors) and duration of therapy. Tamoxifen is contraindicated. Secondary cytoreductive surgery if feasible for recurrent disease, appears to be an acceptable approach. Systemic treatment for recurrent or metastatic disease is mainly hormonal, with or without surgery.

Management and outcomes of adolescent and young adult sarcoma patients: results from the French nationwide database NETSARC

BACKGROUND

The initial management of patients with sarcoma is a critical issue. We used the nationwide French National Cancer Institute-funded prospective sarcoma database NETSARC to report the management and oncologic outcomes in adolescents and young adults (AYAs) patients with sarcoma at the national level.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

NETSARC database gathers regularly monitored and updated data from patients with sarcoma. NETSARC was queried for patients (15-30 years) with sarcoma diagnosed from 2010 to 2017 for whom tumor resection had been performed. We reported management, locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) in AYA treated in French reference sarcoma centers (RSC) and outside RSC (non-RSC) and conducted multivariable survival analyses adjusted for classical prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Among 3,227 patients aged 15-30 years with sarcoma diagnosed between 2010 and 2017, the study included 2,227 patients with surgery data available, among whom 1,290 AYAs had been operated in RSC, and 937 AYAs in non-RSC. Significant differences in compliance to guidelines were observed including pre-treatment biopsy (RSC: 85.9%; non-RSC 48.1%), pre-treatment imaging (RSC: 86.8%; non-RSC: 56.5%) and R0 margins (RSC 57.6%; non-RSC: 20.2%) (p < 0.001). 3y-OS rates were 81.1% (95%CI 78.3-83.6) in AYA in RSC and 82.7% (95%CI 79.4-85.5) in AYA in non-RSC, respectively. Whereas no significant differences in OS was observed in AYAs treated in RSC and in non-RSC, LRFS and PFS were improved in AYAs treated in RSC compared to AYAs treated in non-RSC (Hazard Ratios (HR): 0.58 and 0.83, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the importance for AYA patients with sarcoma to be managed in national sarcoma reference centers involving multidisciplinary medical teams with paediatric and adult oncologists.

Shortening the Time Interval for the Referral of Patients With Soft Tissue Sarcoma to Expert Centers Using Mobile Health: Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

According to guidelines, all patients with sarcoma must be managed from initial diagnosis at expert sarcoma centers. However, in everyday practice, the time interval to an expert center visit can be long, which delays presentation to an expert multidisciplinary tumor board and increases the risk of inappropriate management, negatively affecting local tumor control and prognosis. The advent of mobile health offers an easy way to facilitate communication and cooperation between general health care providers (eg, general practitioners and radiologists) and sarcomas experts. We developed a mobile app (Sar'Connect) based on the algorithm designed by radiologists from the French Sarcoma Group. Through a small number of easy-to-answer questions, Sar'Connect provides personalized advice for the management of patients and contact information for the closest expert center.

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective study is the first to assess this mobile app's potential benefits in reducing the time interval for patient referral to an expert center according to the initial clinical characteristics of the soft tissue tumor.

METHODS

From May to December 2021, we extracted tumor mass data for 78 patients discussed by the multidisciplinary tumor boards at 3 centers of the French Sarcoma Group. We applied the Sar'Connect algorithm to these data and estimated the time interval between the first medical description of the soft tissue mass and the referral to expert center. We then compared this estimated time interval with the observed time interval.

RESULTS

We found that the use of Sar'Connect could potentially shorten the time interval to an expert center by approximately 7.5 months (P<.001). Moreover, for half (31/60, 52%) of the patients with a malignant soft tissue tumor, Sar'Connect could have avoided inappropriate management outside of the reference center. We did not identify a significant determinant for shortening the time interval for referral.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, promoting the use of a simple mobile app is an innovative and straightforward means to potentially accelerate both the referral and management of patients with soft tissue sarcoma at expert centers.

Soft tissue sarcoma incidences and clinical characteristics are significantly different in France and Taiwan

BACKGROUND

The incidence of different soft tissue sarcoma (STS) histotypes among ethnic and geographic populations has not been comprehensively investigated.

METHODS

Data from 2013 to 2016 were obtained from national cancer registry databases in France and Taiwan. Liposarcoma (LPS), leiomyosarcoma (LMS), angiosarcoma (AS), synovial sarcoma (SS), and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) were selected as index STSs to estimate the age-standardized incidence rates (ASRs) and other clinical features between patients.

RESULTS

In total, 9398 patients (7148 from France and 2250 from Taiwan) were included. The ASRs of AS (5.4 vs. 2.8) and MPNST (2.0 vs. 1.0) were significantly higher in Taiwan; France had significantly higher ASRs for LPS (12.0 vs. 10.0), LMS (9.7 vs. 7.6), and SS (1.7 vs. 1.2). Patients in Taiwan with LMS or LPS were younger than their French counterparts. With regard to the distribution according to primary anatomic site, French patients had higher odds for extremity and truncal LMS (odds ratio [OR], 2.84; p < .001), AS (OR, 2.67; p < .001), MPNST (OR, 1.55; p = .027), and LPS (OR, 1.38; p < .001) and for breast AS (OR, 10.58; p < .001). Taiwanese patients had higher odds for liver AS (OR, 10.72; p < .001) and uterine LMS (OR, 3.21; p < .001). SS age and distribution according to primary anatomic site did not differ significantly between the French and Taiwanese populations.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant differences in the incidence and clinical characteristics of index STS suggested that geographic (environmental) and ethnicity factors likely play a vital role in the pathogenesis of STS.

Abstract 2578: High regulatory T cells infiltrate within tertiary lymphoid structure restricts response to immune checkpoint blockers in sarcomas

Background: While composition of the tumor microenvironment (TME) is a prerequisite for an effective antitumor immunity, infiltration of organized B- and T-cells aggregates called tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) has been recently demonstrated to predict response to immune checkpoint blockers (ICB) in sarcomas. However, only a minority of patient derive benefit, suggesting the implication of additional key determinants of ICB-mediated response in TLS-positive sarcomas, such as TLS composition. Using high-throughput spatial transcriptomics and multiplex immunofluorescence (IHF), we aimed at investigating the association between TLS composition and clinical outcome to ICB.

Methods: In an exploratory cohort, we spatially profiled the expression of more than 18000-protein encoding genes from responders (R) and non-responders (NR) using Nanostring’s GeoMx Digital Spatial Profiler (DSP) Whole Transcriptome Atlas (WTA) assay. A first set of regions of interest (ROI) was selected in the TLS and further segmented in “B-cells” vs “no B-cells” areas according to CD20+ staining; a second set of ROI was selected in the tumor tissue and further segmented into “tumor” vs “stroma” areas according to CD45+ staining. Deconvolution of data was performed using SpatialDecon algorithm to estimate cell population within TLS. We then evaluated the association between immune cell composition and response to ICB in each segment. In a validation cohort, we performed multiplexed-IHF assay enabling detection of T cells (CD8/GzmA/CD4/FoxP3/CD56) and B cells. These panel was applied to whole sections baseline sarcoma samples. We investigated the association between immune cell composition and clinical benefit in term of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results: Six patients were selected for the exploratory cohort, including 3 R and 3 NR. Among the top immune cell infiltrate within TLS segment, NR demonstrated higher Treg infiltrate versus R in “no B-cells” compartment (3.4% vs 2.0%, respectively; p=0.010), whereas no association was observed between Treg infiltration and response to ICB in both stromal (p=0.67) or tumor cells (p=0.36) compartments from tumor area. In the validation cohort (N=16), we observed that Treg density within TLS was higher in NR versus R (p=0.0059). Patients with Treg-enriched TLS had shorter PFS (2.6 vs 11.1 months, p=0.042) and OS (9.0 vs 18.3 months, p=0.12) compared to those with Treg-low TLS infiltration. Concordantly, the CTLA-4 key Treg regulator gene was upregulated in the TLS regions from NR.

Conclusions: Altogether, our findings suggest that the presence of Treg within TLS may exert a negative influence on the capacity of TLS to generate an effective antitumor immune response in sarcoma patients treated with ICB, providing new insights in understanding role of TLS in antitumor immunotherapy.

Citation Format: Florent Peyraud, Jean-Philippe Guegan, Christophe Rey, Marina Pulido, Emmanuelle Bompas, Sophie Piperno-Neumann, Christine Chevreau, Nicolas Penel, François Bertucci, Maud Toulmonde, Carine Bellera, Catherine Sautès-Fridman, Antoine Bougoüin, Coralie Cantarel, Michèle Kind, Mariella Spalato-Ceruso, Bérengère Dadone-Montaudie, Jean-Yves Blay, Wolf Herman Fridman, François Le Loarer, Alban Bessede, Antoine Italiano. High regulatory T cells infiltrate within tertiary lymphoid structure restricts response to immune checkpoint blockers in sarcomas [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 2578.

Potential clinical activity of pembrolizumab monotherapy in ovarian sex cords, rare epithelial carcinoma, and other rare ovarian tumor histotypes: The French AcSé pembrolizumab study from Unicancer

5572

Background: AcSé Pembrolizumab is a Phase 2, non-randomized parallel arms, multicentric basket trial investigating the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab monotherapy in different cohorts of patients with rare cancers (NCT03012620). Here we report the results in the rare ovarian tumors cohort. Methods: Selected histotypes were all rare ovarian cancers (incidence < 6/100,000/year). Main inclusion criteria were age > 18, ECOG PS≤1, resistant disease to platinum based chemotherapy, and systematic histological central review by expert pathologist from TMRG network. Patients (pts) received pembrolizumab 200 mg IV on Day 1 of every 21-day cycle for a maximum of 2 years. The primary endpoint was the confirmed objective response rate according to RECIST v1.1 at 12 weeks. Secondary endpoints included best response rate, duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. The 7 subgroups of pts analyzed were carcinosarcoma (CS), clear cell carcinoma (CCC), low grade serous carcinoma (LGSC), mucinous carcinoma (MEOC), sex cord tumors (SCT), germ cell tumor (GCT), and smarcA4 deficient hypercalcemic ovarian tumor (SCHOCCT). Results: 62 pts from 22 centers, were included from 08/2017 to 12/2020. Median Age was 53.5 years old [36-64]. Median number of previous lines of chemotherapy was 2 (range 1-4). The median number of cycles was 8 (range, 1-35) with 44 pts (70.9%) who discontinued the trial after a mean number of 6.8 cycles. There were 2 pts (3.2%) with partial response (PR) at 12 weeks. The best response in ITT was complete response (CR) in 1 patient (1%), PR in 3 (14.3%), and stable disease (SD) in 21 (33.8%). The occurrence of best response depended on the histotype with 1 CR (33%) in GCT (cancerized teratoma), 2 PR (20%) in CCC, and 1 PR (4%) in LGSC. 4/4 pts (100%) reported PD as best response in SCOOHT (Table 1). Median duration of response or stabilized disease was 7.8 months [IQR, 4.1 to 9.0]. At the data cut off, 6-month PFS was 29% [19.7-42.8] and 6-month OS was 77.8% [67.7-89.3] on the overall population. Outcomes differed according to subgroups and will be presented. There were a total of 62 adverse events (AEs) reported in 28 pts. For 5 pts (8%) AEs lead to drug discontinuation. AEs were of grade 1 (n = 9), grade 2 (n = 8), or grade ≥ 3 (n = 45: 42 grade 3, 2 grade 4, and 1 grade 5). Conclusions: Pembrolizumab is safe and well tolerate in this population of rare ovarian cancer pts. AcSé study reports prolonged responses in very selected subtypes of rare ovarian tumor (CCC, cancerized teratoma, and LGCS). Acknowledgements: TMRG (national cancer network dedicated to rare gynecological tumors), GINECO group for partnership, La Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer, INCa and MSD. Clinical trial information: NCT03012620. [Table: see text]

PEC-PRO: A new prognostic score from a series of 93 patients with localized perivascular epithelioid cell neoplasms (PEComas) treated with curative intent

11571

Background: Perivascular Epithelioid Cell Neoplasms (PEComas) encompass a heterogeneous family of mesenchymal tumors. The current understanding of their natural history is limited. Previously described clinicopathological factors aimed to define benign or malignant variants, but there is a lack of prognostic factors associated with recurrence of surgically resected tumors, preventing the development of a prognostic score to better optimize patient’s management. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of clinicopathological features from patients diagnosed with a localized PEComa, within all centers from the French Sarcoma network and one center in Belgium. We analyzed 12 clinicopathological factors in a Cox proportional hazard framework to derive a multivariate prognostic risk model for progression-free survival (PFS). We built the PEComa PROgnostic score (PEC-PRO) ranging from 0 to 5, based on the coefficients of the multivariate model. Three different prognostic groups were identified: low risk (score = 0), intermediate risk (score = 1) and high risk (score ≥2). Results: Ninety-three patients were analyzed with a median follow-up of 46 months (range, 3-253). At diagnosis, the median age was 54 years (range, 13-84), with female predominance (72%). Most common primary locations were uterus (n = 15;16%) and kidney (n = 15;16%). Median tumor size was 6.2 cm (range, 0.8-30). Among patients with reported surgical margins, 64 (73%) and 23 (27%) had R0 and R1-2 margins, respectively. The median PFS was 26 months (IC95, 2.9-124.4), with 1- and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of 95.7% and 69.9%, respectively, while the median OS was not reached. Using univariate analyses, male gender, primary tumor size > 5 cm, high nuclear grade and cellularity, high mitotic rate > 1/50 HPF, necrosis, vascular invasion, nodal invasion, and R1-2 margins were associated with a shorter PFS. Among those, male gender (HR = 2.88; IC95 1.12-7.411, p = 0.03), vascular invasion (HR = 3.14; IC95 1.10-8.96, p = 0.034), necrosis (HR = 3.93; IC95 1.35-11.47, p = 0.015), and R1-2 margins (HR 4.47; IC95 1.60-12.46, p = 0.007) remained associated with PFS in the multivariate analysis and were included in the multivariate model. Median PFS in patients with high PEC-PRO score was 16 months as compared to 104 months and not reached for patients with intermediate and low PEC-PRO scores, respectively (p < 0.001). We also confirmed the prognostic relevance of the PEC-PRO score in terms of OS. Conclusions: Using a weighted combination of clinicopathological features, the PEC-PRO score reliably predicts the post-operative recurrence risk in patients with localized PEComas. It has the potential to better improve follow-up strategies and personalize adjuvant treatments. The findings of this retrospective analysis require validation in a prospective trial.

REGOMAIN: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, multicenter, comparative phase II study of the efficacy of regorafenib as maintenance treatment in patients (pts) with high-grade bone sarcomas (HGBS) at diagnosis or relapse and without complete remission after standard treatment

TPS11585

Background: Primary metastatic osteosarcoma (OS) patients are treated with a curative intent following the same principles of non-metastatic OS, while the treatment of recurrent OS is primarily surgical in the case of isolated lung metastases. When complete removal of all metastases cannot be achieved, the prognosis remains poor, with a median Progression-Free Survival (PFS) between 3 to 8 months, and therefore there is a clinical need to reduce the risk of progression after the initial treatment sequence. The REGOBONE study reported a significant PFS benefit of regorafenib (REG) compared to placebo (in osteosarcomas: median PFS: 16.4 versus 4.1 weeks) and a manageable safety profile in patients with histologically confirmed HGBS (i.e., osteosarcoma or other bone sarcomas with the exception of Ewing sarcomas, chondrosarcoma and chordoma). Methods: This multicenter trial is ongoing to study the efficacy and safety of maintenance REG in pts > = 16 years old with HGBS, without complete remission but with no progressive disease after standard treatment, either at diagnosis or at relapse. Sixty pts will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive either oral REG at a daily dose of 120mg or its matching placebo, continuously for a maximum of 12 months. Randomization is stratified according to the setting of the disease: initial diagnosis versus relapse. The primary objective is to compare the efficacy (PFS) between the 2 arms. The expected 4-month PFS rates are 30% in the control arm and 60% in the REGO arm (HR = 0.42). Fifty-two events will provide 87% power to show significant improvement in PFS, using a 2-sided log-rank test at a 5% level. Secondary endpoints include Overall Response Rate (ORR), Disease Control Rate (DCR), Time to Treatment Failure (TTF), Overall Survival (OS), Quality of Life (QoL), and safety profile. Radiological endpoints will be evaluated using the RECIST 1.1 with tumor assessments every 2 months (first 6 months) and then every 3 months. Translational objectives will identify predictive biomarkers for efficacy of REG as maintenance therapy. Pts of the control arm who experience disease progression may switch to receive open label REG. As of Feb 1st, 2022, 3 patients have been randomized. 14 sites of the French Sarcoma Group will participate. An amendment is being implemented to lower the age limit (12 years old) and to expand tumor types to other HGBS (Ewing sarcomas, chondrosarcomas, Undifferentiated Pleomorphic Sarcomas, Leiomyosarcomas and angiosarcomas). Clinical trial information: NCT04698785.

Activity of regorafenib in patients with non-adipocytic soft tissue sarcoma (NASTS): Evaluation of heterogeneity of treatment effect on the updated analysis of pooled cohorts

11555

Background: Results of the double-blind randomized phase 2 trial (NCT01900743), showed that regorafenib (REG) is an active treatment in patients (pts) previously treated with chemotherapy for an NASTS (cohorts B-leiomyosarcoma, C-synovial sarcoma, D-other sarcoma, Mir 2016), and in pts previously treated with pazopanib (PAZ) (cohort E, Penel 2019). We now present an updated analysis of progression-free survival (PFS) in all NASTS pts to assess the heterogeneity of treatment effect according to histological subtype and prior exposure to PAZ. Methods: Pts received REG 160 mg/d, 21/28 d, or placebo (PB). Pts receiving PB were offered optional cross over in case of centrally confirmed disease progression. The primary endpoint was PFS, according to RECIST-1.1, based on full blinded central review of imaging (including a re-review for cohorts B, C and D, because first analysis was based on a partial central review in these cohorts). Overall survival (OS) was a secondary endpoint. We performed a pooled analysis of cohorts B, C, D and E, on the intent-to-treat dataset, including a multivariate analysis with interaction terms to assess the heterogeneity of treatment effect according to covariates. Results: From 06/2013 to 10/2017, 175 pts were randomized (87 REG vs 88 PB; 56, 27, 55, 37 pts in cohorts B, C, D and E, respectively). The median age was 59 yrs (range, 20-81). There were 101 women (58%). Histological subtype was leiomyosarcoma in 80 pts (LMS; 41 REG vs 39 PB; 56 in cohort B and 24 in cohort E), synovial sarcoma in 28 (SS; 13 REG vs 15 PB; 27 in cohort C and 1 in cohort E), and other sarcoma in 67 (33 REG vs 34 PB; 55 in cohort D and 12 in cohort E). The median number of prior lines of systemic treatment was 2 (range, 1-6). Overall, 43 pts had received prior PAZ (21 REG vs 22 PB). Out of 88 pts assigned to PB, 69 switched to REG after progression (79%). We confirmed a significant PFS-benefit associated with REG in multivariate analysis of the pooled study population, with a HR = 0.48 (95%CI, 0.35–0.66, p < 0.001); median PFS = 2.1 vs 1.0 months, respectively. This benefit appears significant in each histological subtype. However, we observed a borderline interaction between histological subtype and treatment effect (p = 0.09): PFS benefit appears larger in pts with SS (HR = 0.21, 0.10-0.48, p < 0.001) and other sarcoma (HR = 0.49, 0.30-0.81, p = 0.006) than in LMS (HR = 0.59, 0.37-0.93, p = 0.022). PFS benefit appears rather homogeneous across strata of pts with vs without prior exposure to PAZ (interaction test, p = 0.26). Overall, in this study, regorafenib does not show any statistically significant OS-benefit (HR = 0.77, 0.57–1.05, p = 0.10), likely due to the fact that 79% of PB pts crossed over to REG at progression. Conclusions: The present study confirms the clinical PFS benefit associated with regorafenib in all NASTS pts, regardless of prior treatment with pazopanib. Clinical trial information: NCT01900743.

Pembrolizumab in soft-tissue sarcomas with tertiary lymphoid structures: a phase 2 PEMBROSARC trial cohort

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) show limited clinical activity in patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcomas (STSs). Retrospective analysis suggests that intratumoral tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs) are associated with improved outcome in these patients. PEMBROSARC is a multicohort phase 2 study of pembrolizumab combined with low-dose cyclophosphamide in patients with advanced STS (NCT02406781). The primary endpoint was the 6-month non-progression rate (NPR). Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. The 6-month NPR and ORRs for cohorts in this trial enrolling all comers were previously reported; here, we report the results of a cohort enrolling patients selected based on the presence of TLSs (n = 30). The 6-month NPR was 40% (95% confidence interval (CI), 22.7-59.4), so the primary endpoint was met. The ORR was 30% (95% CI, 14.7-49.4). In comparison, the 6-month NPR and ORR were 4.9% (95% CI, 0.6-16.5) and 2.4% (95% CI, 0.1-12.9), respectively, in the all-comer cohorts. The most frequent toxicities were grade 1 or 2 fatigue, nausea, dysthyroidism, diarrhea and anemia. Exploratory analyses revealed that the abundance of intratumoral plasma cells (PCs) was significantly associated with improved outcome. These results suggest that TLS presence in advanced STS is a potential predictive biomarker to improve patients' selection for pembrolizumab treatment.

No Geographical Inequalities in Survival for Sarcoma Patients in France: A Reference Networks' Outcome?

Simple Summary

As patients with rare cancers face specific problems, reference networks have been developed in several European countries and then at the European level to improve their management. In some cases, the specialized centers belonging to reference networks provide remote services (specialized diagnosis review, discussion in the Multidisciplinary Tumour Board, etc.) to increase access to these services. Using data from the national sarcoma reference network implemented in France (NETSARC+), the IGéAS research program assesses the potential of its organization to address the geographical inequalities in cancer management. We analyze the individual, clinical, and geographical determinants of the overall survival of sarcoma patients in France. We found no association between the overall survival of sarcoma patients and variables measuring their social deprivation, remoteness from reference centers, and geographical context. Following previous results from the research program, this study suggests that reference network organization should be considered to reduce cancer inequalities.

Abstract

The national reference network NETSARC+ provides remote access to specialized diagnosis and the Multidisciplinary Tumour Board (MTB) to improve the management and survival of sarcoma patients in France. The IGéAS research program aims to assess the potential of this innovative organization to address geographical inequalities in cancer management. Using the IGéAS cohort built from the nationwide NETSARC+ database, the individual, clinical, and geographical determinants of the 3-year overall survival of sarcoma patients in France were analyzed. The survival analysis was focused on patients diagnosed in 2013 (n = 2281) to ensure sufficient hindsight to collect patient follow-up. Our study included patients with bone (16.8%), soft-tissue (69%), and visceral (14.2%) sarcomas, with a median age of 61.8 years. The overall survival was not associated with geographical variables after adjustment for individual and clinical factors. The lower survival in precarious population districts [HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.48] in comparison to wealthy metropolitan areas (HR = 1) found in univariable analysis was due to the worst clinical presentation at diagnosis of patients. The place of residence had no impact on sarcoma patients’ survival, in the context of the national organization driven by the reference network. Following previous findings, this suggests the ability of this organization to go through geographical barriers usually impeding the optimal management of cancer patients.

Lack of prognostic value of CTNNB1 mutation profile in desmoid-type fibromatosis

PURPOSE

This prospective nationwide cohort study aimed to investigate desmoid-type fibromatosis (DF) outcomes, focusing on the prognostic value of CTNNB1 mutations.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

ALTITUDES (NCT02867033) was a nationwide prospective cohort study of DF diagnosed between January 2016 and December 2020. At diagnosis, CTNNB1 molecular alterations were identified using next-generation sequencing or Sanger sequencing. The primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS) (progression, relapse, or death). We enrolled 628 patients managed by active surveillance (AS), surgical resection (SR), or systemic treatment as front-line therapy.

RESULTS

Overall, 516 (82.2%) patients (368 females [71.3%], median age 40.3 years [range, 1-89]) were eligible for analysis. In 435 (84.3%) cases, there was one CTNNB1 molecular alteration: p.T41A, p.S45F, or p.S45P. The front-line management was AS in 352 (68.2%), SR in 120 (23.3%), and systemic treatments in 44 (8.5%) patients. CTNNB1 mutation distribution was similar across the three therapeutic groups. The median follow-up period was 24.7 (range, 0.4-59.7) months. The estimated 3-year EFS rate was 66.2% (95%CI, 60.5%-71.2%). DF harboring p.S45F was significantly associated with male sex (p=0.03), non-abdominal wall sites (p=0.05), pain (p=0.007), and large tumor size (p=0.025). CTNNB1 p.S45F mutation was not significantly associated with EFS, either in univariate (hazard ratio [HR]=1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65-1.73; p=0.81), or in multivariate analysis (HR=0.91; 95% CI, 0.55-1.49; p=0.71).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that CTNNB1 mutation profile was associated with unfavorable prognostic factors but was not a prognostic factor for EFS.

Patterns of care and outcomes of 417 patients with METAstatic SYNovial sarcoma (METASYN): real-life data from the French Sarcoma Group (FSG)

Background

Synovial sarcoma (SS) occurs in both adult and pediatric patients. The primary aim of this study is to describe the outcomes, prognostic factors, and treatment of patients with metastatic SS within a nationwide cohort.

Patients and methods

All pediatric and adult patients with metastatic SS are registered in the French Sarcoma Group database. Data were collected from the national database https://conticabase.sarcomabcb.org/ up to March 2020. Descriptive and comparative analyses were conducted using SAS 9.4 and Stata Special Edition 16.1 software.

Results

Between January 1981 and December 2019, 417 patients with metastatic SS from 17 French sarcoma centers were included, including 64 (15.3%) under the age of 26 years. Median age was 42.5 years (range 9-87 years). The metastases were synchronous (cohort 1) or metachronous (cohort 2) in 18.9% (N = 79) and 81.1% (N = 338) patients, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) from the date of metastasis was 22.3 months (95% confidence interval 19.7-24.1 months). First-line chemotherapy without ifosfamide and/or doxorubicin was unfavorable for progression-free survival and OS (P < 0.001). Concerning cohort 1, young age, surgery of the primary tumor, and single metastatic site were independent favorable prognostic factors for OS. In cohort 2, surgery within an expert French Sarcoma Group center, absence of chemotherapy in the perioperative setting, the lungs as a single metastatic site, time to first metastasis >12 months, local therapy, and ifosfamide in the first metastatic line were independent favorable prognostic factors.

Conclusions

The outcome of patients with metastatic SS is influenced by local treatment, management in reference centers, and cytotoxic treatments given in the perioperative and metastatic setting.

•

METASYN is the largest retrospective study on metastatic adult and pediatric SS.

•

This study confirms that surgery remains the mainstay for improving OS in reference centers.

•

METASYN emphasizes the importance of focal treatment of metastases for OS.

•

This study offers real-life results in a metastatic setting and is a useful support for developing new strategies.

Randomized phase II study to assess the efficacy and tolerability of sunitinib by dose administration regimen in anti-angiogenic naïve patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): Final analysis of SURF study

344

Background: SUN is approved in mRCC setting at the dose of 50mg daily for 4 weeks followed by 2 weeks rest (4/2 schedule). The 4/2 schedule often requires dose modifications for toxicity. Current recommendation is to reduce the dose to 37.5mg per day. Alternative schedules (2 weeks of treatment followed by one-week rest (2/1 schedule) have shown promising results. SURF trial evaluated prospectively schedule 2/1 when toxicity occurs. Methods: SURF [NCT02689167] is a prospective, non-comparative randomized study. Patients (pts) with mRCC (clear cell) were included at SUN initiation. When a dose adjustment of SUN was required, patients were randomized between 4/2 schedule at 37.5mg daily and experimental 2/1 schedule at 50mg daily. Primary objective was to assess duration of SUN treatment among the 73 first evaluable pts. Overall 226 pts were enrolled with 133 randomized. All other analyses are shown for the 133 randomized patients. Results: Pts were 75.2% males, with a median age 63.7 years for 94% with a Karnofsky ≥ 80%. Of them, 54.9% had partial/total nephrectomy. IMDC risk score was favourable (45.1%), intermediate (46.6%) or poor (8.3%). Pts characteristics were well balanced between 2 arms. Metastatic sites were lungs (60.5%), bones (16.3%), lymph nodes (15.5%). At 6 months, 48 patients (65.8%) of the 2/1 schedule were still on treatment (above predefined threshold for positivity). Other data are listed on the table. No new safety signal was identified. Permanent SUN discontinuation due to toxicity was 22.2% in control arm vs 12.3% in experimental arm. Conclusions: SURF is the largest prospective randomised trial evaluating two different SUN schedules modifications in mRCC in case of toxicity. This positive trial confirms the role of adapting SUN to a 2/1 schedule rather than reducing SUN dose to the classical 4/2 schedule. Clinical trial information: NCT02689167. [Table: see text]

Patient Preference Between Cabazitaxel and Docetaxel for First-line Chemotherapy in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: The CABADOC Trial

BACKGROUND

The taxanes docetaxel and cabazitaxel prolong overall survival for men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), with cabazitaxel approved in the postdocetaxel setting only. Recent data suggest they have similar efficacy but a different safety profile in the first-line mCRPC setting.

OBJECTIVE

To assess patient preference between docetaxel and cabazitaxel among men who received one or more doses of each taxane and did not experience progression after the first taxane.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Chemotherapy-naïve patients with mCRPC were randomized 1:1 to receive docetaxel (75 mg/m² every 3 wk × 4 cycles) followed by cabazitaxel (25 mg/m² every 3 wk × 4 cycles) or the reverse sequence. Randomization was stratified by prior abiraterone or enzalutamide use.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The primary endpoint was patient preference, assessed via a dedicated questionnaire after the second taxane. Secondary endpoints included reasons for patient preference, prostate-specific antigen response, radiological progression-free survival, and overall survival. This clinical trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT02044354.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Of 195 men randomized, 152 met the prespecified modified intent-to-treat criteria for analysis. Overall, 66 patients (43%) preferred cabazitaxel, 40 (27%) preferred docetaxel, and 46 (30%) had no preference (p = 0.004, adjusted for treatment period effect). More patients preferred treatment period 1 (43%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 36-52%) versus period 2 (27%, 95% CI 20-34%). Patient preference for cabazitaxel was mainly related to less fatigue (72%), better quality of life (64%), and other adverse events (hair loss, pain, nail disorders, edema). Adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile of each drug.

CONCLUSIONS

A significantly higher proportion of chemotherapy-naïve men with mCRPC who received both taxanes preferred cabazitaxel over docetaxel. Less fatigue and better quality of life were the two main reasons driving patient choice.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer preferred cabazitaxel over docetaxel for chemotherapy, mainly because of less fatigue and better quality of life.

Rare bone sarcomas: A retrospective analysis of 145 adult patients from the French Sarcoma Group

The benefit of chemotherapy (CT) in rare bone sarcomas is not documented in prospective studies. Our retrospective study from the French sarcoma network for bone tumors ResOs was performed in adult patients (pts) from 1976 to 2014, with histologically verified diagnosis of leiomyosarcomas (LMS), undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) or radiation-associated sarcomas of bone. The median follow-up was 4.7 years (95% CI: 3.7-6.5). Clinical features, treatment modalities and outcomes were recorded and analyzed from 145 pts (median age 53 years [range 20-87]). Site of disease was extremities (66%) or axial skeleton (34%), 111 (77%) presented with localized and potentially resectable disease. The most common histological subtypes were UPS (58%) and LMS (33%); 58% were high-grade tumors. Surgery was performed in 127 pts. In the 111 localized pts, 28 pts (25%) underwent upfront surgery or exclusive radiotherapy (RT; >50 Gy) without CT, whereas 83 pts (75%) received either neoadjuvant (n = 26) or adjuvant CT (n = 13) or both (n = 44). Neoadjuvant and adjuvant CT was mostly doxorubicin-based (95%/86%) and cisplatin-based (67%/63%). R0 resection was achieved in 59 pts, and a good histological response in 15 patients (25%). Adjuvant RT was performed in 24 (22%) pts. For the whole cohort (n = 145), the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 53% [42; 62]. In univariate analysis, age ≤ 60 was associated with a longer disease-free survival (DFS) (P = .0436). Neoadjuvant and adjuvant CT tended to be associated with better DFS (P = .056) with no significant impact on OS in this retrospective series.

Treatment of 120 adult osteosarcoma patients with metachronous and synchronous metastases: A retrospective series of the French Sarcoma Group

Treatment options for metastatic osteosarcomas are scarce. Following failure of standard first line therapy, patients who relapse present a challenging treatment dilemma, and have a poor prognosis. Surgical removal of all metastases is essential. A retrospective analysis of patients with metastatic osteosarcomas was conducted in 15 French Sarcoma Group centers. From January 2009 to December 2018, we identified 120 adult patients; 36 with synchronous and 84 with metachronous metastases with 74 males and 46 females. Mean age was 30 years (18-53). Metastatic sites were lung, bone and other in 91, 11 and 24 patients, respectively. Mean time to first metachronous metastases was 22 months (4-97). All patients except 13 (10.8%) with metachronous metastases received a first line systemic treatment for relapse, and 39 patients (32.5%) were included in a clinical trial. Eighty-one patients (67.5%) had local treatment of distant metastases. Median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 5.5 (95% CI 4.6-6.4) and 20.5 months (95% CI 13.2-27.7) respectively for the overall group. In multivariate analysis, more than five metastases, time to first metastases <24 months, were statistically significant negative prognostic factors for OS and PFS (P = .002, ≤.001 and P = .006, ≤.001, respectively). Surgery of metastases was associated with better prognosis on OS and PFS (P = .001 and .037, respectively). The presence of bone metastases was a negative prognostic factor on OS but not on PFS (P = .021). In reference sarcoma centers, relapsed osteosarcoma patients with more than one metastasis commonly receive more than one line of systemic therapy, and are included in clinical trial if available.

Determinants of the access to remote specialised services provided by national sarcoma reference centres

Background

Spatial inequalities in cancer management have been evidenced by studies reporting lower quality of care or/and lower survival for patients living in remote or socially deprived areas. NETSARC+ is a national reference network implemented to improve the outcome of sarcoma patients in France since 2010, providing remote access to specialized diagnosis and Multidisciplinary Tumour Board (MTB). The IGéAS research program aims to assess the potential of this innovative organization, with remote management of cancers including rare tumours, to go through geographical barriers usually impeding the optimal management of cancer patients.

Methods

Using the nationwide NETSARC+ databases, the individual, clinical and geographical determinants of the access to sarcoma-specialized diagnosis and MTB were analysed. The IGéAS cohort (n = 20,590) includes all patients living in France with first sarcoma diagnosis between 2011 and 2014. Early access was defined as specialised review performed before 30 days of sampling and as first sarcoma MTB discussion performed before the first surgery.

Results

Some clinical populations are at highest risk of initial management without access to sarcoma specialized services, such as patients with non-GIST visceral sarcoma for diagnosis [OR 1.96, 95% CI 1.78 to 2.15] and MTB discussion [OR 3.56, 95% CI 3.16 to 4.01]. Social deprivation of the municipality is not associated with early access on NETSARC+ remote services. The quintile of patients furthest away from reference centres have lower chances of early access to specialized diagnosis [OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.31] and MTB discussion [OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.40] but this influence of the distance is slight in comparison with clinical factors and previous studies on the access to cancer-specialized facilities.

Conclusions

In the context of national organization driven by reference network, distance to reference centres slightly alters the early access to sarcoma specialized services and social deprivation has no impact on it. The reference networks’ organization, designed to improve the access to specialized services and the quality of cancer management, can be considered as an interesting device to reduce social and spatial inequalities in cancer management. The potential of this organization must be confirmed by further studies, including survival analysis.

High clinical activity of pembrolizumab in chordoma, alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) and other rare sarcoma histotypes: The French AcSé pembrolizumab study from Unicancer

11520

Background: AcSé Pembrolizumab is a Phase 2, non-randomized parallel arms, open-label, multicentric study from Unicancer investigating the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab monotherapy in different cohorts of patients with rare cancers (NCT03012620). Here we report the results of pembrolizumab in the rare sarcoma cohort. Methods: Selected histotypes were all rare sarcomas patients (pts) (incidence < 0.2/100,000/year). Main inclusion criteria were age > 18, ECOG PS≤1 and advanced or metastatic disease resistant to standard treatment. Patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg IV as a 30-minute infusion on Day 1 of every 21-day cycle for a maximum of 2 years. The primary endpoint was the confirmed objective response rate according to RECIST v1.1 at 12 weeks. Secondary endpoints included clinical benefit rate, duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Five groups of pts were distinguished, namely chordoma, alveolar soft-part sarcoma (ASPS), desmoplastic small round cell tumor (DSRCT), smarca4 deficient malignant rhabdoid tumor (SMRT), and other histotypes. Results: 98 patients including 34 with chordoma, 14 ASPS, 11 SMRT, 8 DSCRT and 31 with other histotypes, were included from July 2017 to December 2020. The median number of cycles was 5 (range, 1 to 35) with 78 (79.6%) patients who discontinued the trial after a median of 4 cycles. There were 6 (7.3%) partial response (PR) at 12 weeks. The best response was CR in 1 patient (1%), PR in 14 patients (14.3%), and stable disease (SD) in 33 (33.7%). Median duration of response was 8.2 months [IQR, 4.1 to 9.0]. The occurrence of best response depended on the histotype, with 3 (8.8%) responses in chordoma, 7 (50%) in ASPS, 3 (27%) in SMRT, 1 (12.5%) in DSCRT and 1 (3.2%) in other histotypes (p = 0.0011). At the data cut off, median PFS was 2.75 months, and median OS was 19.7 months on the overall population. Outcomes differed according to the histotype group, with the 12 months PFS rates at 31.2% (chordoma), 35.7% (ASPS), 18.2% (SMRT), 0% (DSCRT) and 3.3% (other), respectively (p < 0.0001), and median PFS at 6.6 (chordoma), 7.5 (ASPS), 1.1 (SMRT), 2.1 (DSCRT) and 2.1 months (other), while 1-year OS rates were 76.6% (chordoma), 85.7% (ASPS), 36.4% (SMRT), 17.5% (DSCRT) and 42.9% (other) with median OS only reached for SMRT (2.4 months), DSRCT (10 months), and the other histotype group (7.1 months) (p = 0.004). The side effect profile of pembrolizumab was similar to other tumor type. Conclusions: Pembrolizumab is safe and well tolerate in this pop od STS pts, AcSé study reports high levels response rate and prolonged activity in selected subtypes of rare sarcomas. Clinical trial information: NCT03012620.

PD1 inhibition in soft-tissue sarcomas with tertiary lymphoid structures: A multicenter phase II trial

11507

Background: PD1 inhibition has shown limited activity in all comers clinical trials including patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcomas (STS). In the PEMBROSARC study, objective response rate, progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were respectively 2.1%, 1.4 and 7.1 months respectively (Toulmonde et al. Jama Oncol 2017). We have recently shown that the presence of tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) may represent a biomarker to select patients who are more likely to benefit from immunotherapy (PetitPrez et al., Nature 2020). We report here the first clinical trial investigating the efficacy of PD1 inhibition in TLS-positive STS. Methods: PEMBROSARC is an open-label multicenter phase II study of pembrolizumab in combination with low-dose cyclophosphamide in pts with STS selected based on the presence of TLS. TLS status has been assessed centrally has previously described (PetitPrez et al., Nature 2020). Eligible patients received pembrolizumab 200mg IV q21 days and cyclophosphamide 50 mg BID 1week on, 1 week off. All patients had confirmed progressive disease at inclusion based on central review of two imaging performed at less than 6 months interval. The primary efficacy endpoint was 6-month non-progression (as per RECIST evaluation criteria v1.1). Based on the following hypotheses: 15% 6-month non-progression rate (H0), 40% acceptable 6-month non-progression rate (H1), 5% type I error rate, 90% power, a total of 29 assessable patients were necessary and 8 patients or more had to be progression-free at 6 months to reach the first endpoint. Results: 240 patients were screened for TLS status between September 2018 and January 2020 in 7 centers of the French Sarcoma Group. Among them, 48 were found to be TLS+ as per central review and 35 were included in the study. The three most frequent histological subtypes were: well-differentiated/dedifferentiated liposarcoma (n = 13); UPS (n = 6), and leiomyosarcoma (n = 4). 30 patients were eligible for efficacy. Of those, as per central imaging review, 13 patients (43.3%) had tumor shrinkage resulting in partial response in 8 patients (26.7%) and stable disease in 5 cases (16.7%). 10 patients had progressive disease. Twelve patients were progression-free at 6 months (40.0% 95%CI = [22.7 – 59.4]).Median PFS and OS were 4.1 months (95%CI, 1.4-9.6) and 14.5 months (95%CI, 8.5- 18.3 months), respectively. Conclusions: With an objective response and a 6-month non-progression rates of 26.7% and 40% respectively versus 2.1% and 4.2% in all comers, the PEMBROSARC study confirms that selection based on TLS status is an efficient approach to tailor immunotherapy in STS patients. Clinical trial information: NCT02406781.

ODENZA: A French prospective, randomized, open-label, multicenter, cross-over phase II trial of preference between darolutamide and enzalutamide in men with asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC)

5046

Background: Darolutamide (Daro) and enzamutamide (Enza) are both next generation androgen receptor inhibitors with demonstrated activity in men with CRPC. Although both agents are associated with survival improvement, their toxicity profiles are different. To help decipher whether this may impact on patient preference, we designed the ODENZA trial. Methods: ODENZA is a prospective, randomized, open-label, multicenter, cross-over, phase II trial of preference between Daro and Enza in men with asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic metastatic CRPC. Patients were randomized 1/1 to receive Daro 1200 mg/d for 12 weeks followed by Enza 160 mg/d for 12 weeks (Daro-Enza arm) or the reverse sequence (Enza-Daro arm). In both arms, the second treatment was given in absence of evidence of cancer progression at week 12. The primary endpoint was patient preference between the two drugs, as assessed by a questionnaire at week 24. The Prescott's test was used to determine treatment preference in patients fullfilling pre planned criteria (exposure to both treatments, no progression at week 12, and completion of the preference questionnaire). A p-value greater than 0.05 indicates that there is no difference in preference between treatments. Stratification factors were performance status and prior taxane for mCSPC. After week 24, patients went on to an extension period during which they received the chosen treatment until progression or toxicity. The main secondary objectives included reasons for preference, response at week 12, cognitive assessment, and toxicity. Results: Overall 249 pts were randomized, median age 72y (68; 79), ECOG PS 0 (56%), prior taxanes (22%). Two hundred pts fulfilled the pre-planned criteria for evaluation of the preference primary endpoint : 97 (48.5% [41.3;55.7]), 80 (40.0% [33.0;47.0]), and 23 (11.5% [6.8;16.2]) chose Daro, Enza, and had no preference, respectively (unilateral p-value of 0.92). After preference assessment, 186 patients entered the extension period: 103 (55.4%) and 83 (44.6%) received Daro and Enza respectively. The most common factors influencing patient preference all numerically favored Daro over Enza, without significant differences were: less fatigue (44% vs 29%), ease of taking the medication (37% vs 31%), better quality of life (36% vs 28%), ability to be more active (26% vs 15%), ability to concentrate (22% vs 15%) and less falls (6% vs 3%). A PSA50 response was achieved in 76.2% and 83.9% at week 12 with Daro and Enza respectively (p = 0.13). Fatigue was the most frequently reported all grade adverse event at week 12, in 21% and 36% with Daro and Enza, respectively. Conclusions: More patients with early mCRPC preferred Daro over Enza, although the difference did not reach significance, with fatigue as the key influencing factor. Clinical trial information: NCT03314324.

REGOSTA: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, multicenter study evaluating the efficacy and safety of regorafenib (REGO) as maintenance therapy after first-line treatment in patients (pts) with osteosarcoma (OS) and non-osteosarcomas (non-OS) of bone (non-Ewing, non-chondrosarcomas and non-chordomas)

TPS11576

Background: Pts with OS and non-OS of bone are treated with a multimodal sequence therapy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT), surgery and adjuvant CT, followed by a close surveillance until recurrence. At recurrence, the prognosis remains poor with objective response rates of 3-29%, and a median Progression-Free Survival (PFS) of less than 4 months in OS. There is a clinical need to reduce the risk of recurrence after the initial treatment sequence. The REGOBONE study reported a significant clinical benefit of regorafenib compared to placebo in patients with relapsed OS (median PFS: 16.4 versus 4.1 weeks). Methods: This multicenter trial is ongoing to study the efficacy and safety of maintenance REGO in pts > = 16 years, with complete remission after initial treatment sequence of their bone sarcoma. 168 pts will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive either oral REGO or its matching placebo (control arm) at a daily dose of 120mg, continuously and for a maximum of 12 months. Randomization will be stratified according to the following risk factors: metastases (mets) at diagnosis and/or poor response to neoadjuvant CT versus no mets at diagnosis and good response to neoadjuvant CT. The primary objective is to compare the efficacy (Relapse-Free Survival) between the 2 arms. The expected 3-year RFS rates are 55% in the control arm and 74.6% in the REGO arm (HR = 0.5). 66 events will provide 80% power to show significant improvement in RFS, using a 2-sided log-rank test at a 5% level. Secondary endpoints include Time to Treatment Failure, Overall Survival, Quality of Life, safety profile, and compliance to treatment. Radiological endpoints will be evaluated using the RECIST 1.1. Translational objectives will be to identify predictive biomarkers for efficacy of REGO as maintenance therapy using liquid biopsies. As of Feb 1st, 2021, 3 patients have been randomized. 15 sites of the French Sarcoma Group will participate. Clinical trial information: NCT04055220.

Impact of surgical margins on survival in cutaneous sarcomas: A nationwide study of French Sarcoma Group (FSG) from NETSARC Database

e23537

Background: R0 surgery in reference centers is the cornerstone for sarcomas treatment with better local control and survival and is mandatory for ESMO-EURACAN and NCCN guidelines. The medical community is out on this issue for cutaneous sarcomas, if they have to follow suit. This retrospective descriptive study focused on margin status and local relapse-free survival (LRFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients (pts) with cutaneous sarcomas. Methods: Between 01/01/10 and 30/12/17, surgery was performed on 2044 pts with cutaneous sarcomas from 20 centers. Data were collected from the NETSARC national network database ( http://netsarc.sarcomabcb.org ). Diagnosis of cutaneous sarcoma was reviewed and histologically confirmed by a local expert pathologist of RRePS (“Network for expert pathology diagnosis in sarcoma”). Dermatofibrosarcoma, Kaposi sarcoma and rare subtypes (< 20 cases in the database) were excluded. Univariate analyses were conducted using log rank test or Cox test. Multivariate analyses were conducted using Cox test. Age and tumor size were analyzed as continuous values. Two-sided significant p level was set at < 0.05. Results: Mean age was 66 years. Primary tumor was localized in lower limb, trunk wall, head and neck and upper limb for 30%, 26%, 26% and 18% pts respectively. Main subtypes were leiomyosarcoma, undifferentiated sarcoma, and myxofibrosarcoma for 29%, 29%, and 14% pts respectively. Angiosarcoma was the subtype of 9% of the patients (n = 193). Mean size was 45 mm. FNCLCC grade was 1, 2, and 3 for 14%, 29.5%, and 24% tumors respectively. Before surgery, imaging and biopsy were performed for 21% and 51% pts respectively. Surgery was carried out in a NETSARC center for 26% of the pts. Margin status after initial surgery was R0, R1, and R2 for 35% (n = 724), 34% (n = 696), and 12% pts (n = 246) respectively. Re-excision was performed for 34% (703/2044 pts), leading to a subsequent R0 margin for 74% of them (523/703 pts, equivalent to 26% of the overall population). Local relapse occurred for 21% of pts after a median time of 10 months. Metastatic relapse occurred for 13% of pts after a median time of 11 months. One hundred and ninety-three pts (9%) died. Median follow-up was 12 months. In multivariate analyses, statistically significant favorable prognostic factors for LRFS were: young age, small tumor size and non-angiosarcoma subtype. Significant prognostic factors associated with longer OS were: young age, small tumor size, non-angiosarcoma subtype, FNCLCC grade (1 vs 2 and 1 vs 3) and initial R0 surgery. Conclusions: Cutaneous sarcomas share same favorable clinical prognostic factors than non-cutaneous sarcomas. Quality of surgery remains the mainstay for OS.

A randomized phase III trial comparing trabectedin to best supportive care in patients with pre-treated soft tissue sarcoma: T-SAR, a French Sarcoma Group trial

BACKGROUND

The French Sarcoma Group assessed the efficacy, safety, and quality of life (QoL) of trabectedin versus best supportive care (BSC) in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase III study included adults with STS who progressed after 1-3 prior treatment lines. Patients were randomized (1 : 1) to receive trabectedin 1.5 mg/m² every 3 weeks or BSC, stratified into L-STS (liposarcoma/leiomyosarcoma) and non-L-STS groups (other histotypes). Patients from the BSC arm were allowed to cross over to trabectedin at progression. The primary efficacy endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) confirmed by blinded central review and analyzed in the intention-to-treat population.

RESULTS

Between 26 January 2015 and 5 November 2015, 103 heavily pre-treated patients (60.2% with L-STS) from 16 French centers were allocated to receive trabectedin (n = 52) or BSC (n = 51). Median PFS was 3.1 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.8-5.9 months] in the trabectedin arm versus 1.5 months (0.9-2.6 months) in the BSC arm (hazard ratio = 0.39, 95% CI 0.24-0.64, P < 0.001) with benefits observed across almost all analyzed subgroups, but particularly in patients with L-STS (5.1 versus 1.4 months, P = 0.0001). Seven patients (13.7%) in the trabectedin arm (all with L-STS) achieved a partial response, while no objective responses were observed in the BSC arm (P = 0.004). The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (44.2% of patients), leukopenia (34.6%), and transaminase increase (32.7%). Health-related 30-item core European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire evidenced no statistical differences between the arms for any domain and at any time point. After progression, 91.8% of patients crossed over from BSC to trabectedin.

CONCLUSION

Trabectedin demonstrates superior disease control to BSC without impairing QoL in patients with recurrent STS of multiple histologies, with greater impact in patients with L-STS.

Successive Osteosarcoma Relapses after the First Line O2006/Sarcome-09 Trial: What Can We Learn for Further Phase-II Trials?

Simple Summary

Osteosarcoma is the most common primary malignant bone tumour in adolescents and young adults. The survival of osteosarcoma patients has not improved for four decades. The purpose was to describe first and subsequent relapses in patients from the OS2006/Sarcome-09 trial, to help future trial design. Among the 434 patients with a confirmed osteosarcoma who achieved CR1 during first line treatment, 157 patients experienced at least one relapse. The 3-year progression-free and overall survival rates were 21% and 37%, respectively. Only a quarter of the patients were included in clinical trials at first recurrence. We want to promote randomised phase-II trials in osteosarcoma relapses, with broad inclusion criteria at study entry in terms of age and disease status, and PFS as primary endpoint. Surgery/local treatment of all residual lesions should be allowed when feasible. Single-arm trial design could be used for subsequent relapses.

Abstract

The purpose was to describe first and subsequent relapses in patients from the OS2006/Sarcome-09 trial, to help future trial design. We prospectively collected and analysed relapse data of all French patients included in the OS2006/Sarcome-09 trial, who had achieved a first complete remission. 157 patients experienced a first relapse. The median interval from diagnosis to relapse was 1.7 year (range 0.5–7.6). The first relapse was metastatic in 83% of patients, and disease was not measurable according to RECIST 1.1 criteria in 23%. Treatment consisted in systemic therapy (74%) and surgical resection (68%). A quarter of the patients were accrued in a phase-II clinical trial. A second complete remission was obtained for 79 patients. Most of them had undergone surgery (76/79). The 3-year progression-free and overall survival rates were 21% and 37%, respectively. In patients who achieved CR2, the 3y-PFS and OS rates were 39% and 62% respectively. Individual correlation between subsequent PFS durations was poor. For osteosarcoma relapses, we recommend randomised phase-II trials, open to patients from all age categories (children, adolescents, adults), not limited to patients with measurable disease (but stratified according to disease status), with PFS as primary endpoint, response rate and surgical CR as secondary endpoints.

Exploratory gene-by-gene analysis of olaparib in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): PROfound

126

Background: The Phase 3 PROfound trial (NCT02987543) met its primary endpoint and key secondary endpoints, including improved overall survival (OS) for olaparib in men with mCRPC with alterations in BRCA1, BRCA2, or ATM (Cohort A). We report gene-by-gene analysis of olaparib antitumor activity among the 15 prespecified homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes. Methods: Pts were randomized to olaparib (300 mg bid; n=256) or physician’s choice of enzalutamide or abiraterone (control; n=131). Exploratory analyses in pts with alterations in BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 (BRCA, regardless of co-occurring alterations with other HRR genes) or in single genes were conducted. Results: Evidence of olaparib antitumor activity was observed in subgroups with >10 pts (table). Data for pts with alterations in only BRCA1, BRCA2, PPP2R2A, RAD51B, RAD54L, PALB2, BRIP1, CHEK1, BARD1, and RAD51D will be reported (no FANCL or RAD51C enrolled). Conclusions: Small subgroups limit interpretation for some genes. Olaparib antitumor activity is greatest in pts with BRCA alterations, with a spectrum of clinical sensitivity to olaparib as defined by rPFS and OS across the broader population with alterations in other HRR genes. Clinical trial information: NCT02987543. [Table: see text]

Management of sarcomas in children, adolescents and adults: Interactions in two different age groups under the umbrellas of GSF-GETO and SFCE, with the support of the NETSARC+ network

Sarcomas are a rare heterogeneous group of malignant neoplasms that can arise in almost any anatomic site and any age. Close collaboration among adult and pediatric cancer specialists in the management of these tumors is of foremost importance. In this review, we present the current multidisciplinary organization in care of patients with sarcoma in France and we review the main advances made in the last decades in systemic and radiotherapy treatment in the main sarcoma types diagnosed in children, adolescents and young adults (AYA), thanks to the international collaboration.

Pharmacogenetic Study of Trabectedin-Induced Severe Hepatotoxicity in Patients with Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Hepatotoxicity is an important concern for nearly 40% of the patients treated with trabectedin for advanced soft tissue sarcoma (ASTS). The mechanisms underlying these liver damages have not yet been elucidated but they have been suggested to be related to the production of reactive metabolites. The aim of this pharmacogenetic study was to identify genetic variants of pharmacokinetic genes such as CYP450 and ABC drug transporters that could impair the trabectedin metabolism in hepatocytes. Sixty-three patients with ASTS from the TSAR clinical trial (NCT02672527) were genotyped by next-generation sequencing for 11 genes, and genotype-toxicity association analyses were performed with R package SNPassoc. Among the results, ABCC2 c.1249A allele (rs2273697) and ABCG2 intron variant c.-15994T (rs7699188) were associated with an increased risk of severe cytolysis, whereas ABCC2 c.3563A allele had a protective effect, as well as ABCB1 variants rs2032582 and rs1128503 (p-value < 0.05). Furthermore, CYP3A5*1 rs776746 (c.6986A > G) increased the risk of severe overall hepatotoxicity (p = 0.012, odds ratio (OR) = 5.75), suggesting the implication of metabolites in the hepatotoxicity. However, these results did not remain significant after multiple analysis correction. These findings need to be validated on larger cohorts of patients, with mechanistic studies potentially being able to validate the functional consequences of these variants.

A randomized double-blind phase II study evaluating the role of maintenance therapy with cabozantinib in high-grade uterine sarcoma after stabilization or response to doxorubicin ± ifosfamide following surgery or in metastatic first line treatment (EORTC62113)

BACKGROUND

Uterine sarcomas are a group of rare tumors that include different subtypes. Patients with histopathological high-grade diseases are at high-risk of recurrence or progression, and have a poor prognosis. We aim to explore the most appropriate management in patients with uterine high-grade sarcomas.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of maintenance treatment with cabozantinib in patients with high-grade uterine sarcomas who achieved clinical benefit after standard chemotherapy.

STUDY HYPOTHESIS

Maintenance treatment with cabozantinib after standard chemotherapy given as an adjuvant treatment after curative surgery, or in locally advanced or metastatic disease, increases progression-free survival compared with placebo TRIAL DESIGN: This is a randomized double blinded phase II trial.

MAJOR INCLUSION/EXCLUSION CRITERIA

The study is enrolling adult patients with high-grade undifferentiated uterine sarcomas, high-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas, high-grade leiomyosarcoma, and high-grade adenosarcoma, FIGO (Federation International gynecologue Obstétricien) stage II/III to IV in stable disease or who achieved complete or partial response with doxorubicin ± ifosfamide, who are assigned 1:1 to 60 mg daily cabozantinib (experimental arm) or placebo (control arm), as maintenance therapy. Exclusion criteria include low-grade sarcoma.

PRIMARY ENDPOINT

Progression-free survival at 4 months.

SAMPLE SIZE

The study plans to enroll 90 patients to allow the randomization of 54 patients to detect an improvement in 4-month progression-free survival from 50% to 80% with 15% significance level and 85% power. Estimated dates for accrual completion: recruitment for the trial started in February 2015, and has currently enrolled 83 patients, of whom 35 patients have been randomized. The end of recruitment is anticipated for December 2020.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01979393.