The Inhaler Technique Questionnaire (InTeQ): Development and Validation of a Brief Patient-Reported Measure

There is a need for instruments designed for patients with asthma to self-report their performance of inhaling steps. We aimed to develop an accessible and easy-to-use patient-reported tool for inhaler technique assessment, which could also serve as a training and monitoring resource for any type of inhaler device, and to evaluate its feasibility, validity, and reliability in adults with asthma. The development was based on literature review and pilot testing with clinicians and patients. The Inhaler Technique Questionnaire (InTeQ) asks about the frequency of performing five steps when using inhalers (on a five-point Likert scale). We analyzed data from adults with persistent asthma (n = 361). We examined the measurement model using Mokken scaling analysis, construct validity by assessing hypotheses on expected discrimination among known groups, and reliability based on internal consistency and reproducibility. Means of the InTeQ items were in the range of 0.23–1.61, and coefficients of homogeneity were above the cutoff point, demonstrating the unidimensionality of the scale. Known groups’ global score differences were statistically significant between patients reporting having “Discussed in detail” or having “Not discussed/Only in general” the inhaler technique with their healthcare providers (p = 0.023). The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.716, and the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.775. The InTeQ is a feasible, valid, and reliable instrument for self-reporting inhaler technique on any type of device.

Does adherence to inhaled corticosteroids predict asthma-related outcomes over time? A cohort study

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) adherence is important for asthma management. Current evidence on the impact of ICS adherence on outcomes is mostly based on correlational analyses of between-person data. Although it is widely acknowledged that asthma outcomes fluctuate over time, evidence on predictors of within-person change is scarce. We aimed to quantify these fluctuations and the longitudinal relationships between ICS adherence and outcomes at both between- and within-person levels.A prospective cohort of persistent asthma patients in France and the UK (n=847, age 6-40 years) provided 3756 reports over up to 2 years via computer-assisted telephone interviews and text messages on ICS adherence, asthma control, reliever medication use and exacerbations. We examined adherence-outcome relationships via longitudinal models, controlling for confounders, including severity.Considerable within-person variability was found for exacerbations (91%), asthma control (59%) and reliever use (52%); 431 (11.5%) reports signalled exacerbations and 2046 (54.5%) poor control. At between-person level, patients with higher average adherence were more likely to report asthma control (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.06-1.47), but not asthma exacerbations (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.87-1.12) or lower reliever use (b -0.0004, 95% CI -0.089-0.088). At within-person level, higher-than-usual adherence was associated with higher concomitant reliever use (b 0.092, 95% CI 0.053-0.131) and lower subsequent reliever use (b -0.047, 95% CI -0.005- -0.088); it was unrelated to asthma control (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.84-1.02) or exacerbations (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.94-1.16).Patients maintaining high ICS adherence over time have better asthma control. Temporarily increasing ICS adherence tends to be simultaneous to higher reliever use and reduces reliever use later on. Causes of within-person variation in outcomes require more investigation.

The REal Life EVidence AssessmeNt Tool (RELEVANT): development of a novel quality assurance asset to rate observational comparative effectiveness research studies

BACKGROUND

Evidence from observational comparative effectiveness research (CER) is ranked below that from randomized controlled trials in traditional evidence hierarchies. However, asthma observational CER studies represent an important complementary evidence source answering different research questions and are particularly valuable in guiding clinical decision making in real-life patient and practice settings. Tools are required to assist in quality appraisal of observational CER to enable identification of and confidence in high-quality CER evidence to inform guideline development.

METHODS

The REal Life EVidence AssessmeNt Tool (RELEVANT) was developed through a step-wise approach. We conducted an iterative refinement of the tool based on Task Force member expertise and feedback from pilot testing the tool until reaching adequate inter-rater agreement percentages. Two distinct pilots were conducted-the first involving six members of the Respiratory Effectiveness Group (REG) and European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) joint Task Force for quality appraisal of observational asthma CER; the second involving 22 members of REG and EAACI membership. The final tool consists of 21 quality sub-items distributed across seven methodology domains: Background, Design, Measures, Analysis, Results, Discussion/Interpretation, and Conflict of Interest. Eleven of these sub-items are considered critical and named "primary sub-items".

RESULTS

Following the second pilot, RELEVANT showed inter-rater agreement ≥ 70% for 94% of all primary and 93% for all secondary sub-items tested across three rater groups. For observational CER to be classified as sufficiently high quality for future guideline consideration, all RELEVANT primary sub-items must be fulfilled. The ten secondary sub-items further qualify the relative strengths and weaknesses of the published CER evidence. RELEVANT could also be applicable to general quality appraisal of observational CER across other medical specialties.

CONCLUSIONS

RELEVANT is the first quality checklist to assist in the appraisal of published observational CER developed through iterative feedback derived from pilot implementation and inter-rater agreement evaluation. Developed for a REG-EAACI Task Force quality appraisal of recent asthma CER, RELEVANT also has wider utility to support appraisal of CER literature in general (including pre-publication). It may also assist in manuscript development and in educating relevant stakeholders about key quality markers in observational CER.

Quality standards in respiratory real-life effectiveness research: the REal Life EVidence AssessmeNt Tool (RELEVANT): report from the Respiratory Effectiveness Group-European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Task Force

INTRODUCTION

A Task Force was commissioned jointly by the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) and the Respiratory Effectiveness Group (REG) to develop a quality assessment tool for real-life observational research to identify high-quality real-life asthma studies that could be considered within future guideline development.

METHODS

The resulting REal Life EVidence AssessmeNt Tool (RELEVANT) was achieved through an extensive analysis of existing initiatives in this area. The first version was piloted among 9 raters across 6 articles; the revised, interim, version underwent extensive testing by 22 reviewers from the EAACI membership and REG collaborator group, leading to further revisions and tool finalisation. RELEVANT was validated through an analysis of real-life effectiveness studies identified via systematic review of Medline and Embase databases and relating to topics for which real-life studies may offer valuable evidence complementary to that from randomised controlled trials. The topics were selected through a vote among Task Force members and related to the influence of adherence, smoking, inhaler device and particle size on asthma treatment effectiveness.

RESULTS

Although highlighting a general lack of high-quality real-life effectiveness observational research on these clinically important topics, the analysis provided insights into how identified observational studies might inform asthma guidelines developers and clinicians. Overall, RELEVANT appeared reliable and easy to use by expert reviewers.

CONCLUSIONS

Using such quality appraisal tools is mandatory to assess whether specific observational real-life effectiveness studies can be used to inform guideline development and/or decision-making in clinical practice.

Development of the International Severe Asthma Registry (ISAR): A Modified Delphi Study

BACKGROUND

The lack of centralized data on severe asthma has resulted in a scarcity of information about the disease and its management. The development of a common data collection tool for the International Severe Asthma Registry (ISAR) will enable standardized data collection, subsequently enabling data interoperability.

OBJECTIVES

To create a standardized list of variables for the first international registry for severe asthma via expert consensus.

METHODS

A modified Delphi process was used to reach consensus on a minimum set of variables to capture in ISAR: the core variables. The Delphi panel brought together 27 international experts in the field of severe asthma research. The process consisted of 3 iterative rounds. In each round, all Delphi panel members were issued an electronic ISAR Delphi workbook to complete and return to the ISAR Delphi administrator. Workbooks and result summaries were anonymously distributed by the Delphi administrator to all panel members at subsequent rounds. Finalization of the core variable list was facilitated by 2 face-to-face meetings.

RESULTS

Of the initial 747 selected variables, the Delphi panel reached a consensus on 95. The chosen variables will allow severe asthma to be assessed against patient demographics and medical history, patient-reported outcomes, diagnostic information, and clinical characteristics. Physician-reported outcomes such as nonadherence and information about treatment and management strategies will also be recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first global attempt to generate an ISAR using a common set of core variables to ensure that data collected across all participating countries are standardized.

Explaining the Amount and Consistency of Medical Care and Self-Management Support in Asthma: A Survey of Primary Care Providers in France and the United Kingdom

BACKGROUND

The quality of asthma primary care may vary between countries, health care practices, and health care professionals (HCPs). Identifying and explaining such differences is critical for health services improvement.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the quality of asthma primary care in France and United Kingdom, and identify within-country and between-country predictors amenable to intervention.

METHODS

An online questionnaire to capture asthma medical care and self-management support, practice characteristics, and psychosocial determinants was completed by 276 HCPs. Mokken scaling analyses were used to examine item structure and consistency. Hierarchical regression analyses were used to identify predictors of the amount (number of asthma care activities HCPs delivered) and consistency (the degree to which HCPs deliver similar care) of asthma medical care and self-management support.

RESULTS

On average, HCPs reported delivering 74.2% of guideline-recommended care. Consistency of medical care and self-management support was lower among HCPs delivering a lower amount of care (r = 0.58 and r = 0.57, P < .001). UK HCPs provided more and more consistent asthma self-management support-but not medical care-than French HCPs, which was explained by the presence of practice nurses in the United Kingdom. More training, positive social norms, and higher behavioral control explained better quality of care across all HCPs.

CONCLUSIONS

Using carefully developed questionnaires and advanced psychometric analyses, this study suggests that involving practice nurses, making social expectations visible, and providing more training to enhance skills and confidence in asthma care delivery could enhance the amount and consistency of asthma primary care. This needs to be corroborated in a future intervention trial.

Measuring medication adherence in asthma: Development of a novel self-report tool

OBJECTIVE

This study presents the development and validation of MIS-A (Medication Intake Survey-Asthma), a new self-report instrument measuring key adherence properties during long-term asthma treatment.

DESIGN

Within a longitudinal asthma cohort study in France and the United Kingdom, adult patients and caregivers of children responded to computer-assisted telephone interviews.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Scores for distinct adherence properties (taking adherence, correct dosing, therapeutic coverage, drug holidays, overuse) and composite measures were computed for several time intervals. We examined distributions, longitudinal variation, associations between adherence scores and concordance with adherence calculated from medication prescribing or dispensing records.

RESULTS

Nine hundred and two participants reported on adherence to 4481 medications on 4140 occasions. About 59.47 and 70.36% revealed < 100% taking adherence in the last week and month; 42.76% had a drug holiday of > 1 week in the last 4 months. Adherence varied within patients during the follow-up (intra-class correlation = . 41-.71). Correlations between adherence scores were moderate to strong (ρ = .51-.85, p ≤ .001), except medication overuse (ρ = .04-.19, p ≤.05). Four-month taking adherence was associated with dispensing adherence, but not with prescribing adherence (ρ = .33, p < .001; and .12, p = .26).

CONCLUSION

MIS-A is a promising, easy-to-use self-report tool that can capture accurately different adherence properties over a long time period.

Inhaled Corticosteroid Adherence Patterns in a Longitudinal Asthma Cohort

BACKGROUND

Electronic prescribing records can enable exploration of medication adherence, but analysis decisions may influence estimates and require alignment to new consensus-based definitions.

OBJECTIVE

To compare different computations of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) implementation in a primary care asthma population initiating ICS therapy when assessed within episodes of persistent use, and examine longitudinal variation in implementation.

METHODS

A historical cohort study was conducted on UK's Optimum Patient Care Research Database. Eligible patients had physician-diagnosed asthma, initiated ICS therapy, and had 3 or more years of continuous registration. ICS treatment episodes were constructed on the basis of 3 definitions, permitting 30-, 90-, and 182-day gaps between prescriptions. Implementation was estimated using 2 continuous medication availability (CMA I and II) definitions to explore effects of carryover of previous prescriptions in 4 observation windows: 6, 8, 12, and 24 months. Impact of methodology was assessed by descriptive statistics, linear mixed models, and measures of agreement.

RESULTS

A total of 13,922 eligible patients (mean age, 39.9 years; 48.7% men) were identified. For CMA I, permitting a 90-day gap, mean ICS implementation for the 2-year period was 89.3% (±16.0%; range, 14.4%-100%). Sensitivity analyses with 30- and 182-day gaps resulted in increased (97.0% ± 7.2%) and decreased (81.1% ± 21.6%) estimates. CMA II produced estimates with varying concordance (0.69-0.87). Substantial variance was found between and within patients (intraclass coefficient, 0.30-0.36).

CONCLUSIONS

Different analysis choices resulted in substantial variation in implementation estimates, highlighting the need for transparent and clinically relevant methododology. Distinguishing between (non)persistence and implementation is important in clinical practice, and may require different interventions in routine consultations.

[Irritable bowel syndrome and healthcare consumption. An observational study in private gastroenterology]

AIM

Little data is available on the management of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) in daily practice. The purpose of our study was to study the relationship between the severity of IBS and healthcare consumption.

METHODS

During a cross-sectional epidemiological study undertaken by 330 private gastro-enterologists, the severity of IBS symptoms experienced by patients was quantified with Francis' score (limits 0-500) to study the relationship with the healthcare consumption.

RESULTS

Data obtained from 1407 patients (mean age: 52.3 +/- 15 years, females: 68%) were analysed. Symptoms were usually long-lasting (mean duration: 134.1 +/- 128.4 months); they had required on average 5.7 +/- 4.5 medical visits in the past year including 2.3 +/- 2.1 visits to a gastroenterologist. The mean number of additional investigations performed by patient was 1.3 +/- 1.4. Ninety one percent of them took at least one medication. The mean severity score was 268.5 +/- 85.2. Patients' distribution according to severity showed that 47.3% of the patients had symptoms of moderate severity and 44.9% of high severity. There was a significant relationship between, in one hand, severity of symptoms and, in the other hand, the number of visits (P<0.001), the number of additional investigations (P<0.001) and the number of prescribed medications (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

There was a positive relationship between the severity of symptoms and the healthcare consumption in private gastroenterological practice. The data confirm the significant burden of IBS in France.