Could medial femoral notching be a marker in posterolateral corner injuries?

INTRODUCTION

Posterolateral corner (PLC) injuries constitute 16 % of all knee ligament injuries and are often seen with other ligamentous injuries. PLC injuries can be overlooked. If left untreated, other ligamentous reconstructions are at risk, residual laxity may occur, and early osteoarthritis may result.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients diagnosed with PLC injury and who underwent surgical treatment between November 2018 and November 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Two groups were formed 44 PLC patients with a concomitant ligament injury and 50 patients with an isolated ACL injury (control group). Preoperative MRI findings and arthroscopic surgery findings of the patients were evaluated. Medial femoral condyle notching sign (MFNS) and lateral femoral condyle notching sign (LFNS) data were obtained from preoperative MRI sections. If the lesion depth was less than 1.5 mm, it was not considered a notching sign.

RESULTS

In group 1, there were 44 patients with PLC injuries accompanied by other ligamentous injuries. In group 2, there were 50 patients with isolated ACL injuries not accompanied by other ligamentous injuries. Medial femoral notching sign (MFNS) was higher in Group 1 (p < 0.00001). The lateral femoral notching sign (LFNS) was higher in Group 2 (p:0.023).

CONCLUSION

PLC injuries are difficult to diagnose. MFNS is a finding that may facilitate diagnosis in PLC injuries.

Comparison of Intramedullary and Extramedullary Fixation Results in Subtrochanteric Femur Fractures

OBJECTIVE

The subtrochanteric femur is a load-bearing region where deforming forces are effective. These fractures are difficult to treat for orthopedic surgeons. In this article, we aimed to compare intramedullary (IM) and extramedullary (EM) fixation methods for these fractures that do not have gold standard treatment.

METHODS

Eighty-five patients were retrospectively evaluated. Patients with IM implants (IM femoral nail, proximal femoral nail) were grouped as Group 1, and patients with EM implants were grouped as Group 2 (95° condylar plate, locked anatomical proximal femoral plate). Patients' age, gender, fractured hip side, etiology, anesthesia type, preoperative waiting time, follow-up period, fracture type, Harris hip score (HHS), and mechanical complications were examined.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 44.13 years. There was no difference between the groups in terms of age and gender. The mean follow-up period of the patients was 13.28 months. Falling from a height was the most common cause of subtrochanteric fracture. IM fixation was applied to 62 patients, and EM fixation was applied to 23 patients. No significant difference was found between Groups 1 and 2 in non-union, delayed union, implant failure, shortness rates, and HHS.

CONCLUSION

Both IM and EM fixation methods have advantages and disadvantages in treating subtrochanteric fractures. These methods yield similar results in both groups in our study. The issue of fixation methods remains controversial in the literature, and further studies are needed on this subject.

The Comparison of Dynamic Condylar Screw Plate to Proximal Femoral Nail in Reverse Oblique and Transverse Intertrochanteric Fractures: A Retrospective Study on 61 Patients

OBJECTIVE

Reverse oblique (RO) and transverse intertrochanteric fracture patterns constitute a challenge for the operating surgeon. Currently, no gold standard fixation method exists. This study aimed to retrospectively compare proximal femoral nail (PFN) to dynamic condylar screw (DCS) plating in the treatment of RO and transverse intertrochanteric fractures.

METHODS

A total of 61 patients fixated by PFN or DCS were included. Of these, 36 were treated with PFN (21 females and 15 males; mean age: 65.52 years), and 25 were treated with DCS (12 females and 13 males; mean age: 59.36 years). The mean follow-up time was 33.8 and 42.6 months (range: 24-108). Radiological evaluation included the quality of fracture reduction, neck-shaft angle change, posteromedial support presence, and bone union time. Complications such as mechanical failure, nonunion, and infection were noted.

RESULTS

The only significant differences between the fixation methods were the superiority of DCS over PFN in earlier fracture union time (mean values: 8.9 versus 14.1 weeks) and the superiority (p=0.007) of PFN in shorter hospital stay (3.4 days versus 5.1 days). No significant difference was observed in radiological parameters. While similar mechanical complication rates were found, a significantly higher nonunion rate was detected with the DCS.

CONCLUSION

The most crucial disadvantage of DCS was the high rate of nonunion. Closed fracture reduction in PFN seems to be the most critical parameter to prevent severe complications. The open reduction using DCS showed no advantages over closed reduction and PFN fixation in providing a more anatomical alignment in AO/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) 31-A3 fractures. However, we recommend PFN application in this type of fracture, since nonunion is more common in DCS.

Open reduction and Salter innominate osteotomy combined with femoral osteotomy in the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip: Comparison of results before and after the age of 4 years

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiological findings of radical reduction (open reduction and Salter innominate osteotomy combined with femoral osteotomy) for children of walking age, younger and older than 4 years in the treatment of with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).

METHODS

In this retrospective study, children of walking age with DDH who underwent radical reduction between 2008 and 2014 were identified. They were then divided into 2 groups according to the age at which the surgery was performed: before and after the age of 4 years. Improvement in the acetabular index was examined on follow-up radiographs. The presence of avascular necrosis (AVN) was determined and classified on the basis of the Kalamchi-MacEwen classification on final follow-up radiographs. Clinical assessment was performed with the modified McKay criteria at the final follow-up appointment.

RESULTS

A total of 19 children (14 girls, 5 boys; mean age=37.5±21 months) (25 hips) were included. Their mean age was 27.9±4.9 and 63.3±19.7 months in children operated before and after the age of 4 years, respectively. The mean follow-up time was 29.9±19 and 19.6±5 months in children operated before and after the age of 4 years, respectively. No significant difference was observed in improvements in the acetabular index between children younger than 4 years (24±6.9°) and those older than 4 years (20.7±6.7°) (p=0.25). According to the modified McKay criteria, all the children younger than 4 years exhibited excellent or good clinical results compared with those operated after the age of 4 years (67%) (p=0.013). At the final follow-up, 64% of all patients demonstrated no radiographical sign of AVN. The rates of AVN were significantly higher in children operated after the age of 4 years (33%) than in those operated before the age of 4 years (19%) (p=0.049).

CONCLUSION

Better clinical and radiographical results can be expected from radical reduction in children undergoing surgery before the age of 4 years.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

level III, Therapeutic Study.